CHAPTER XII.

THE ROSE, IN CEREMONIES AND FESTIVALS, AND IN THE ADORNMENT OF

BURIAL-PLACES.

Among the ancients, the Rose was conspicuous in all the sacred

ceremonies, and in public and private fêtes. The Greeks and the Romans

surrounded the statues of Venus, of Hebe, and of Flora, with garlands

of roses. They were lavish of these flowers at the festivals of Flora;

in those of Juno, at Argos, the statue of the Olympian Queen was

crowned with lilies and roses. In the festivals of Hymen, at Athens,

the youth of both sexes, crowned with roses and adorned with flowers,

mingled in dances which were intended to represent the innocence of

primeval times. At Rome, in the public rejoicings, they sometimes

strewed the streets with roses and other flowers. It is thus that

Lucretius gives a description of the manner in which were celebrated

the festivals of Cybele.[3]

To scatter flowers on the passage of the funeral procession of a

private citizen was an honor not common at Rome. Pliny informs us,

however, that a Scipio, belonging to the illustrious family of

that name, who while he was tribune, fulfilled his duties to the

satisfaction of the people, dying without leaving sufficient to pay

his funeral expenses, the people voluntarily contributed to pay them,

and on the appearance of the body, cast flowers upon its passage.

At Baiæ, when fêtes were given upon the water, the whole surface of

the lake of Lucina appeared covered with roses.

The custom of encircling the head, of surrounding the neck, and also

the breast, with crowns and garlands of roses, on different occasions,

and particularly during the last days of a gay festival, when, after

the solid dishes, they passed to the dessert and the rare wines, is

well known by the odes of Anacreon, and from the writings of several

of the ancient poets.

The voluptuous Horace, when he abandoned himself to pleasures, was

always supplied with roses. In congratulating one of his friends on

his safe return from Spain, he recommended that these flowers should

not be wanting at the festival. On another occasion, he told his

favorite servant that he cordially disliked the pompous displays of

the Persians, and escaped them by searching in what place the late

Rose was found. Drawing a picture of luxurious ease for his friend

Hirpinus, he speaks of "lying under the shade of a lofty Plane or

Pine tree, perfuming our spotless hair with Assyrian spikenard, and

crowning ourselves with roses." We can very well judge how general had

become the custom of making crowns of roses, from the number of times

which it is mentioned in Pliny, and the frequency with which Martial

speaks of it in his epigrams. The latter author also informs us, that

in the very height of Roman luxury and revealing, the most favorable

time for soliciting and obtaining a favor was when the patron was

entirely given up to the pleasures of the table and of roses.[4]

Whatever doubt may exist of the use of crowns of roses, as objects

of luxury, it is well authenticated, that among medical men of

antiquity, endeavors were made to determine what kinds of flowers were

suitable to place in crowns without detriment to health; and according

to the report made on this subject, the parsley, the ivy, the myrtle,

and the Rose, possessed peculiar virtues for dissipating the fumes

of the wine. According to Athenæus, a crown of roses possessed not

only the property of alleviating pain in the head, but had a very

refreshing effect.

Pliny mentions two Greek physicians--Mnesitheus and Callimachus,--who

wrote on this subject.

The custom of crowning with roses had passed from the Greeks to the

Romans, and it also existed among the Hebrews, who had probably

borrowed it from some of the neighboring nations, either from the

Egyptians, in the midst of whom they had spent many years, or from

the Babylonians, with whom they had in the captivity much connection.

The practice of this custom among the Israelites is attested by the

previously quoted passage, in the apocryphal "Wisdom of Solomon."

At Rome it was not only at the religious festivals that they crowned

themselves with roses and other flowers, but it was the custom to

wear these crowns during public and private fêtes; they were strictly

forbidden at some other times, and above all on certain public

occasions, where to appear with such an ornament would pass for an

insult to a public calamity. Pliny informs us, that during the second

Punic war, which lasted sixteen years, a banker named Lucius Fulvius,

for looking from his gallery on the Forum, and wearing a crown of

roses on his head, was, by order of the Senate, sent to prison, from

which he was not liberated until the end of the war.

This anecdote, moreover, proves that crowns of roses were in fashion

at Rome at an early period, and before licentiousness and luxury had

yet made many inroads upon the national character.

It may readily be supposed, that at Rome, under the emperors, the

use of crowns of flowers was, like every other species of luxury at

that time, constantly on the increase. At first they wore the crowns

interwoven with leaves of flowers, then they wore them composed partly

of roses, and finally they were not satisfied unless they consisted of

these flowers only.

Martial, as we have already mentioned, speaks often of his crowns of

roses. The crown sent by this poet to his friend Sabinus was composed

entirely of these flowers, and he was desirous that they should be

considered the production of his own gardens.

From the poverty of Turkish history, little is known of the early use

of the Rose among them. We have, however, some account of its use

among the Mohammedan Persians.

Although wine was forbidden by the laws of Mahomet, the Persians

frequently made use of it; and in the time of Tavernier and of

Chardin, they frequently drank it to excess. One of their kings,

Soliman III., was intoxicated almost every day; and it was the custom

then in Persia, to serve the wine in crystal decanters, which, when

the season permitted, they corked with roses.

The most interesting purpose to which roses were devoted was the

adornment of tombs and burial-places. The Greeks employed generally

for this object, the myrtle and the amaranth; but the Romans gave the

preference to the lily, the saffron-plant, and, above all, the Rose.

The ancients were careful to renew the plants which were placed

around the sepulchral urn, in order that it might be surrounded by

a continual spring. These flowers were regarded as sacred, and as a

relic of the deceased.

The Romans considered this pious care so agreeable to the spirits of

the departed, that wealthy citizens bequeathed by will entire gardens,

to be reserved for furnishing their tombs with flowers. They also

often ordered that their heirs, or those to whom they left a legacy

for the care of their ashes, should meet together every year, on the

anniversary of their death, and dine near their tomb, scattering roses

about the place. This custom is attested by several stories of ancient

Roman tombs. One with an ancient inscription was found at Ravenna, and

others in some other parts of Italy.

D'Orbessan, in his "_Essai sur les Roses_," mentions having seen,

at Torcello, a city about five miles from Venice, an inscription of

this kind, mentioning a donation made by an emancipated slave to the

assembly of the _Centum_, consisting of gardens and a building to

be employed in celebrating his obsequies and those of his master.

It requested that roses should not be spared, and that food should

be then distributed in abundance. Generally, the donation made on

condition of covering the funeral monument with roses was transferred

to another, if that condition was not fulfilled. Sometimes the most

terrible maledictions threatened those who dared to violate these

sacred gardens. That which proves how frequent among the Romans was

this custom of ornamenting tombs with roses is, that those who were

not rich enough to make such bequests often directed to be engraved

upon the stone which covered their remains a request to the passers-by

to scatter roses upon their tomb. Some of these stones still exist,

with the following inscription: "_Sparge, precor, Rosas supra mea

busta, viator._" It was, perhaps, because they compared the short

duration of human life to the quick fading existence of the Rose, that

this flower was devoted to the burial-place of the dead; and there

can certainly be chosen no more beautiful emblem of this transitory

state of existence. This supposition is somewhat strengthened by the

following passage from Jerome, one of the early Christian fathers:

"The ancients scattered roses over the urns of the

deceased, and in their wills ordered that these flowers should

adorn their graves, and should be renewed every year. It was

also the custom for husbands to cast roses, violets, and

lilies, on the urns which enclosed the ashes of their wives.

These modest flowers were emblematic signs of their grief. Our

Christians were content to place a Rose among the ornaments of

their graves, as the image of life."

In Turkey, females that died unmarried had a rose sculptured at the

top of their monument.

At the well-known cemetery of Père la Chaise, which has often excited

the ecstasy, admiration, or praise of many travelers, but which in

reality exhibits neither elegance, sentiment, nor taste, wreaths of

roses and other flowers are frequently seen upon the thickly crowded

tombs, either as mementos of affection, or in compliance with a

popular custom; while the street leading to the cemetery is filled

with shops in which are exposed for sale the wreaths of flowers.

The prevalence of the same custom in Denmark is alluded to by

Shakespeare, in Hamlet, in the scene of Ophelia's burial.

The custom still remains also in America and Great Britain. In Wales,

when a young girl dies, her female companions bring flowers with them

to her funeral, and place them in her coffin. They plant lilies and

snow-drops over the graves of children, and wild and cultivated roses

over those of adults.

Gwillym, a Welsh poet, thus speaks of the custom in one of his

elegies:--"Oh! while the season of flowers and the tender sprays,

thick of leaves, remain, I will pluck the roses from the brakes, to be

offered to the memory of a child of fairest fame; humbly will I lay

them on the grave of Ivor."

Evelyn tells us that "the white rose was planted at the grave of a

virgin, and her chaplet was tied with white riband, in token of her

spotless innocence; though sometimes black ribands were intermingled,

to bespeak the grief of the survivors. The red rose was occasionally

used in remembrance of such as had been remarkable for their

benevolence; but roses in general were appropriated to the graves of

lovers."

Drummond, the Scotch poet, requested one of his friends to have the

following couplet placed over his grave:

"Here Damon lies, whose songs did sometimes grace

The murmuring Esk:--may roses shade the place."

The first Christians disapproved of the use of these flowers, either

at their festivals or as ornaments for their tombs, on account of

its connection with the pagan mythology, and the custom thus became

extinct. Tertullian wrote a book against crowns and garlands. Clement

of Alexandria thought it improper that Christians should crown

themselves with roses. A little later, however, Christians relaxed

from this strictness, and the Christian poet Prudence did not fear to

invite his brethren "to cover with violets and with verdure, and to

surround with perfumes those bones which the voice of the All-Powerful

would one day restore to life."

The Roman Catholics of this day admit flowers to their churches and

ceremonies, and on feast days they adorn the altars with bouquets and

garlands. At the most imposing of these solemnities, the day of the

"_Fête-Dieu_," rose petals, during the procession, are scattered in

the air, and blended with the perfume of censers, directed towards the

Host; in many of the towns, particularly those in the south of France

and of Europe, the streets through which the procession passes are

scattered throughout with fragrant herbs and flowers of every kind.

Since the extinction of paganism in a greater part of the world, the

custom of wearing crowns of flowers at festivals has passed entirely

away. Women only use roses as an ornament for their hair, or employ

them in different parts of their toilet. In our own country the

toilet of a bride is never considered perfect unless she wears a

wreath of roses or other flowers, whose snow-white hue is an emblem

of her departing maidenhood. Sometimes she is provided only with a

bouquet of white roses and camellias, and her bridesmaids wear similar

ornaments of nature's manufacture.

The Rose is abundantly used by children in their beautiful celebration

of May-day. We well recollect our enjoyment of one of these scenes

some years since. We were returning from a ride in the vicinity of

Charleston, S. C., on the first day of this, the sunniest of the

months of spring--a day dedicated not to the spirit of motion, and

celebrated not by processions of furniture carts, amid the bustle and

noise of a populous city, but dedicated there, at the sunny South, to

innocent and joyous festivity, and celebrated amid all the fresh and

fragrant luxuriance of southern vegetation, surrounded by the delicate

sweetness of the magnolia, the Rose, and other flowers, while the

mocking-bird, with its sweet and varied note, was the minstrel for the

occasion. Riding quietly along the road, we were suddenly stopped by

a procession which had just dismounted from a number of carriages in

a beautiful grove hard by. It consisted mostly of noble-looking boys

and beautiful girls, of all ages under fourteen, the latter dressed in

white and crowned with wreaths of roses and other flowers. The manly

attention of the boys to the fair creatures with whom they walked

hand in hand would not have disgraced the gallantry of Bayard, or the

politeness of Chesterfield. As the procession wound slowly from our

view, under the shade of the lofty live oak and the rich magnolia, we

could not help reflecting how beautiful was this graceful enjoyment

of the sunny days of childhood, and how preferable to the mental

excitement and precocious training of many of the infant philosophers

of this most enlightened nineteenth century.

It is much to be regretted that in circles where fashion reigns

supreme, nature is gradually giving way to art, and instead of the

fresh and natural beauty of a newly gathered Rose, various forms of

artificial flowers are found upon the center table, or in the hair

of those whose quick discernment and refined taste should lead them

to perceive the great inferiority of these artificial toys to the

delicate beauty and welcome fragrance of a Rose just from its parent

plant.

Very much additional matter could be inserted respecting the early

history of the Rose, and its connection with ancient superstitions.

Sufficient, however, has been given to show the esteem in which the

Rose was held by the ancient Greeks and Romans.

Parsons on the Rose A Treatise on the Propagation, Culture and History of the Rose · 第 12 / 16 章