V: WATER MUSIC

The house in which I live is haunted by the noise of dripping water.

Always, day and night, summer and winter, something is dripping

somewhere. For many months an unquiet cistern kept up within its iron

bosom a long, hollow-toned soliloquy. Now it is mute; but a new and more

formidable drip has come into existence. From the very summit of the

house a little spout—the overflow, no doubt, of some unknown receptacle

under the roof—lets fall a succession of drops that is almost a

continuous stream. Down it falls, this all but stream, a sheer forty or

fifty feet on to the stones of the basement steps, thence to dribble

ignominiously away into some appointed drain. The cataracts blow their

trumpets from the steep; but my lesser waterfalls play a subtler, I had

almost said a more “modern” music. Lying awake at nights, I listen with

a mixture of pleasure and irritation to its curious cadences.

The musical range of a dripping tap is about half an octave. But within

the bounds of this major fourth, drops can play the most surprising and

varied melodies. You will hear them climbing laboriously up small

degrees of sound, only to descend at a single leap to the bottom. More

often they wander unaccountably about in varying intervals, familiar or

disconcertingly odd. And with the varying pitch the time also varies,

but within narrower limits. For the laws of hydrostatics, or whatever

other science claims authority over drops, do not allow the dribblings

much licence either to pause or to quicken the pace of their falling. It

is an odd sort of music. One listens to it as one lies in bed, slipping

gradually into sleep, with a curious, uneasy emotion.

Drip drop, drip drap drep drop. So it goes on, this watery melody, for

ever without an end. Inconclusive, inconsequent, formless, it is always

on the point of deviating into sense and form. Every now and then you

will hear a complete phrase of rounded melody. And then—drip drop,

di-drep, di-drap—the old inconsequence sets in once more. But suppose

there were some significance in it! It is that which troubles my drowsy

mind as I listen at night. Perhaps for those who have ears to hear, this

endless dribbling is as pregnant with thought and emotion, as

significant as a piece of Bach. Drip drop, di-drap, di-drep. So little

would suffice to turn the incoherence into meaning. The music of the

drops is the symbol and type of the whole universe; it is for ever, as

it were, asymptotic to sense, infinitely close to significance, but

never touching it. Never, unless the human mind comes and pulls it

forcibly over the dividing space. If I could understand this wandering

music, if I could detect in it a sequence, if I could force it to some

conclusion—the diapason closing full in God, in mind, I hardly care

what, so long as it closes in something definite—then, I feel, I should

understand the whole incomprehensible machine, from the gaps between the

stars to the policy of the Allies. And growing drowsier and drowsier, I

listen to the ceaseless tune, the hollow soliloquy in the cistern, the

sharp metallic rapping of the drops that fall from the roof upon the

stones below; and surely I begin to discover a meaning, surely I detect

a trace of thought, surely the phrases follow one another with art,

leading on inevitably to some prodigious conclusion. Almost I have it,

almost, almost.... Then, I suppose, I fall definitely to sleep. For the

next thing I am aware of is that the sunlight is streaming in. It is

morning, and the water is still dripping as irritatingly and

persistently as ever.

Sometimes the incoherence of the drop music is too much to be borne. The

listener insists that the asymptote shall somehow touch the line of

sense. He forces the drops to say something. He demands of them that

they shall play, shall we say, “God Save the King,” or the Hymn to Joy

from the Ninth Symphony, or _Voi che Sapete_. The drops obey

reluctantly; they play what you desire, but with more than the

ineptitude of the child at the piano. Still they play it somehow. But

this is an extremely dangerous method of laying the haunting ghost whose

voice is the drip of water. For once you have given the drops something

to sing or say, they will go on singing and saying it for ever. Sleep

becomes impossible, and at the two or three hundredth repetition of

_Madelon_ or even of an air from _Figaro_ the mind begins to totter

towards insanity.

Drops, ticking clocks, machinery, everything that throbs or clicks or

hums or hammers, can be made, with a little perseverance, to say

something. In my childhood, I remember, I was told that trains said, “To

Lancashire, to Lancashire, to fetch a pocket handkercher”—and _da capo_

ad infinitum. They can also repeat, if desired, that useful piece of

information: “To stop the train, pull down the chain.” But it is very

hard to persuade them to add the menacing corollary: “Penalty for

improper use Five Pounds.” Still, with careful tutoring I have succeeded

in teaching a train to repeat even that unrhythmical phrase.

Dadaist literature always reminds me a little of my falling drops.

Confronted by it, I feel the same uncomfortable emotion as is begotten

in me by the inconsequent music of water. Suppose, after all, that this

apparently accidental sequence of words should contain the secret of art

and life and the universe! It may; who knows? And here am I, left out in

the cold of total incomprehension; and I pore over this literature and

regard it upside down in the hope of discovering that secret. But

somehow I cannot induce the words to take on any meaning whatever. Drip

drop, di-drap, di-drep—Tzara and Picabia let fall their words and I am

baffled. But I can see that there are great possibilities in this type

of literature. For the tired journalist it is ideal, since it is not he,

but the reader who has to do all the work. All he need do is to lean

back in his chair and allow the words to dribble out through the nozzle

of his fountain pen. Drip, drop....

On the Margin: Notes and Essays · 第 15 / 44 题