NO. 117, SPECTATOR--ADDISON.

“There are some opinions in which man should stand neuter, without

engaging his assent to one side or the other. Such a hovering faith as

this, which refuses to settle upon his determination, is absolutely

necessary in a mind that is careful to avoid errors and prepossessions.

When the arguments press equally on both sides in matters that are

indifferent to us, the safest method is to give up ourselves to neither.

“It is with this temper of mind that I consider the subject of

witchcraft. Whenever I hear the relations that are made from all parts

of the world, not only from Norway and Lapland, from the East and West

Indies, but from every particular nation in Europe, I cannot forbear

thinking that there is such an intercourse and commerce with evil

spirits, as that which we express by the name of witchcraft. But when

I consider that the ignorant and credulous parts of the world abound

most in these relations, and the persons among us who are supposed to

engage in such an infernal commerce, are people of weak understanding

and crazed imagination--and at the same time reflect upon the many

impostures and delusions of this nature that I have detected in all

ages, I endeavor to suspend my belief till I hear more certain accounts

than any which have yet come to my knowledge. In short, when I consider

the question, whether there are such persons in the world as those we

call witches, my mind is divided between two opposite opinions, or

rather (to speak my thoughts freely) I believe there is, and has been,

such a thing as witchcraft; at the same time can give no credit to any

particular instance of it.

“I am engaged in this speculation, by some occurrences that I met with

yesterday, which I shall give my reader an account of at large. As I

was walking with my friend Sir Roger by the side of one of his woods,

an old woman applied herself to me for charity. Her dress and figure

put me in the mind of the following description in Otway:

In a close lane as I pursu’d my journey

I spied a wrinkled hag, with age grown double,

Picking dry sticks, and mumbling to herself.

Her eyes with scalding rheum were gall’d and red;

Cold palsy shook her head; her hands seemed wither’d;

And on her crooked shoulders had she wrapt

The tatter’d remnant of an old striped hanging,

Which served to keep her carcass from the cold:

So there was nothing of a piece about her.

Her lower weeds were all o’er coarsely patch’d

With different colored rags, black, red, white, yellow,

And seemed to speak variety of wretchedness.

“As I was musing on this description, and comparing it with the object

before me, the knight told me, that this very old woman had the

reputation of a witch all over the country; that her lips were observed

to be always in motion; and that there was not a switch about her house

which her neighbors did not believe had carried her several hundred

miles. If she chanced to stumble, they always found sticks or straws

that lay in the figure of a cross before her. If she made any mistake

at church, and cried amen in the wrong place, they never failed to

conclude that she was saying her prayers backward. There was not a maid

in the parish that would take a pin of her, though she should offer a

bag of money with it. She goes by the name of Moll White, and has made

the country ring with several imaginary exploits which are palmed upon

her. If the dairy-maid does not make her butter come so soon as she

would have it, Moll White is at the bottom of the churn. If a horse

sweats in the stable, Moll White has been upon his back. If a hare

makes an unexpected escape from the hounds, the huntsman curses Moll

White. ‘Nay,’ says Sir Roger, ‘I have known the master of the pack,

upon such an occasion, send one of his servants to see if Moll White

had been out that morning.’

“This account raised my curiosity so far, that I begged my friend Sir

Roger to go with me into her hovel, which stood in a solitary corner

under the side of the wood. Upon our first entering, Sir Roger winked

to me, and pointed to something that stood behind the door, which upon

looking that way, I found to be an old broom-staff. At the same time he

whispered to me in the ear to take notice of a tabby cat that sat in

the chimney corner, which, as the old knight told me, lay under as bad

a report as Moll herself; for beside that Moll is said to accompany her

in the same shape, the cat is reported to have spoken twice or thrice

in her life, and to have played several pranks above the capacity of an

ordinary cat.

“I was secretly concerned to see human nature in so much wretchedness

and disgrace, but at the same time could not forbear smiling to hear

Sir Roger, who is a little puzzled about the old woman, advising her as

a justice of peace to avoid all communication with the devil, and never

to hurt any of her neighbors’ cattle. We concluded our visit with a

bounty which was very acceptable.

“In our return Sir Roger told me that Moll had been often brought

before him for making children spit pins, and giving maids the

nightmare; and that the country people would be tossing her into a pond

and trying experiments with her every day, if it was not for him and

his chaplain.

“I have since found upon inquiry that Sir Roger was several times

staggered with the reports that had been brought him concerning this

old woman, and would frequently have bound her over to the county

sessions, had not his chaplain with much ado persuaded him to the

contrary.

“I have been the more particular in this account, because I hear there

is scarcely a village in England that has not a Moll White in it.

When an old woman begins to doat, and grow chargeable to a parish, she

is generally turned into a witch, and fills the whole country into

extravagant fancies, imaginary distempers, and terrifying dreams. In

the meantime, the poor wretch that is the innocent occasion of so many

evils, begins to be frightened at herself, and sometimes confesses

secret commerces and familiarities that her imagination forms in a

delirious old age. This frequently cuts off charity from the greatest

objects of compassion, and inspires people with a malevolence towards

those poor discrepit parts of our species, in whom human nature is

defaced by infirmity and dotage.”

* * * * *

A word of explanation here seems necessary. At the time of Sir Roger’s

supposed movements, memory of the great Matthew Hopkins was lively in

many places, and, now and then, imitators sprang up, just as today,

while the idea is generally discarded and thrown on the scrap heap of

exploded opinions, you will find in back country districts, “water

witches” who will undertake to locate water or minerals and tell the

depth at which they are to be found.

Matthew Hopkins lived in Essex and had made himself conspicuous in

discovering the devil’s mark on many witches. He had a peculiar

monopoly for a time, and, being a specialist, was much sought after,

aiding the judges with his knowledge of “such cattle” as he called

them, whenever a witch was suspected. Lesser lights in the way of

specialists soon appeared.

Later, he assumed the title of “Witch Finder General” and traveled

through the central counties witch hunting. In one year, he brought

more than sixty old women to the stake. His favorite method was that

advocated by King James in his “Demonologie.” The hands and feet of

the suspected one were cross tied, then, wrapped in a blanket, they

were laid on their backs in a pond. If they sank, they were adjudged

innocent, but if they floated for a short time, as was often the case,

especially when they were laid carefully on the water, they were judged

guilty and burned.

Another test was to make the suspected one repeat the Lord’s Prayer

and the Creed. If a word was missed or wrongly pronounced, she was

accounted guilty. It was said that witches could not weep more than

three tears, and those only from the left eye. Thus, the natural

excitement and its effect became a proof of guilt.

Hopkins traveled through his counties like a man of consideration,

attended by two assistants, put up at the chief inn of the place,

and always at the cost of the authorities. His charges were twenty

shillings a town, his expenses of living while there, and his

transportation. This he claimed whether he found witches or not. If he

found any, he charged twenty shillings a head in addition when they

were brought to execution. For three years he carried on this infamous

trade, success making him so insolent and rapacious, that high and

low became his enemies. The Rev. Mr. Gaul, a clergyman of Houghton,

in Huntingdonshire, wrote a pamphlet accusing him of being a common

nuisance. Hopkins replied in an angry letter to the mayor of Houghton,

stating his intention of visiting their town, but desiring to know

whether it held many such sticklers for witchcraft as Mr. Gaul, and

asking whether they were willing to receive and entertain him with

the customary hospitality. He added by way of threat, that in case

he did not receive a satisfactory reply, “He would waive their shire

altogether and betake himself to such places where he might do and

punish, not only without control, but with thanks and recompense.”

Mr. Gaul describes, in his pamphlet, one of the modes employed by

Hopkins. It was proof even more atrocious than the swimming test. He

says, that the “witch-finding general” used to take the suspected

witch and place her in the middle of a room, upon a stool or table,

cross-legged, or in some other uneasy posture. If she refused to sit

in this manner, she was bound with strong cords. Hopkins then placed

persons to watch her, for four and twenty hours, during which time she

was to be kept with meat and drink. It was supposed that one of her

imps would come during that interval, and suck her blood. As the imp

might come in the shape of a wasp, a moth, a fly or other insect, a

hole was made in the door or window to let it enter. The watchers were

ordered to keep a sharp lookout, and endeavor to kill any insect that

appeared in the room. If any fly escaped, or if they could not kill it,

the woman was guilty; the fly was her imp, and she was sentenced to be

burned, and twenty shillings went into the pockets of master Hopkins.

In this manner he made one old woman confess because four flies had

appeared in the room, that she was attended by four imps, named

“Ilemazar,” “Pyewackett,” “Peck-in-the-crown,” and “Grizel-Greedigut.”

Hopkins was eventually caught in his own trap. Suspected presently,

he was beset by a mob in the village of Suffolk, and accused of being

himself a wizard. An old reproach was brought against him, that he had,

by means of sorcery, cheated the devil out of a certain memorandum

book, in which Satan had entered the names of all the witches in

England. “Thus,” said someone, “you find out witches, not by God’s

aid, but by the devil’s.” In vain he denied his guilt. The crowd put

him to his own test. He was stripped and given the swimming test. Some

say that he floated, was taken out, tried and executed upon no other

proof of his guilt. Others assert that he was drowned. As no judicial

entry of his trial and execution is found in any register, it appears

most probable that he was killed.

Joseph Addison and his time · 第 24 / 37 题