LETTER 234. TO MR. MOORE.

"March 8. 1816.

"I rejoice in your promotion as Chairman and Charitable Steward,

&c. &c. These be dignities which await only the virtuous. But then,

recollect you are _six_ and _thirty_, (I speak this enviously--not

of your age, but the 'honour--love--obedience--troops of friends,'

which accompany it,) and I have eight years good to run before I

arrive at such hoary perfection; by which time,--if I _am_ at

all[92],--it will probably be in a state of grace or progressing

merits.

"I must set you right in one point, however. The fault was

_not_--no, nor even the misfortune--in my 'choice' (unless in

_choosing at all_)--for I do not believe--and I must say it, in the

very dregs of all this bitter business--that there ever was a

better, or even a brighter, a kinder, or a more amiable and

agreeable being than Lady B. I never had, nor can have, any

reproach to make her, while with me. Where there is blame, it

belongs to myself, and, if I cannot redeem, I must bear it.

"Her nearest relatives are a * * * *--my circumstances have been

and are in a state of great confusion--my health has been a _good_

deal disordered, and my mind ill at ease for a considerable period.

Such are the causes (I do not name them as excuses) which have

frequently driven me into excess, and disqualified my temper for

comfort. Something also may be attributed to the strange and

desultory habits which, becoming my own master at an early age, and

scrambling about, over and through the world, may have induced. I

still, however, think that, if I had had a fair chance, by being

placed in even a tolerable situation, I might have gone on fairly.

But that seems hopeless,--and there is nothing more to be said. At

present--except my health, which is better (it is odd, but

agitation or contest of any kind gives a rebound to my spirits and

sets me up for the time)--I have to battle with all kinds of

unpleasantnesses, including private and pecuniary difficulties, &c.

&c.

"I believe I may have said this before to you, but I risk repeating

it. It is nothing to bear the _privations_ of adversity, or, more

properly, ill fortune; but my pride recoils from its _indignities_.

However, I have no quarrel with that same pride, which will, I

think, buckler me through every thing. If my heart could have been

broken, it would have been so years ago, and by events more

afflicting than these.

"I agree with you (to turn from this topic to our shop) that I

have written too much. The last things were, however, published

very reluctantly by me, and for reasons I will explain when we

meet. I know not why I have dwelt so much on the same scenes,

except that I find them fading, or _confusing_ (if such a word may

be) in my memory, in the midst of present turbulence and pressure,

and I felt anxious to stamp before the die was worn out. I now

break it. With those countries, and events connected with them, all

my really poetical feelings begin and end. Were I to try, I could

make nothing of any other subject, and that I have apparently

exhausted. 'Wo to him,' says Voltaire, 'who says all he could say

on any subject.' There are some on which, perhaps, I could have

said still more: but I leave them all, and too soon.

"Do you remember the lines I sent you early last year, which you

still have? I don't wish (like Mr. Fitzgerald, in the Morning Post)

to claim the character of 'Vates' in all its translations, but were

they not a little prophetic? I mean those beginning, 'There's not a

joy the world can,' &c. &c., on which I rather pique myself as

being the truest, though the most melancholy, I ever wrote.

"What a scrawl have I sent you! You say nothing of yourself, except

that you are a Lancasterian churchwarden, and an encourager of

mendicants. When are you out? and how is your family? My child is

very well and flourishing, I hear; but I must see also. I feel no

disposition to resign it to the contagion of its grandmother's

society, though I am unwilling to take it from the mother. It is

weaned, however, and something about it must be decided. Ever," &c.

[Footnote 92: This sad doubt,--"if I _am_ at all,"--becomes no less

singular than sad when we recollect that six and thirty was actually the

age when he ceased to "be," and at a moment, too, when (as even the

least friendly to him allow) he was in that state of "progressing

merits" which he here jestingly anticipates.]

* * * * *

Having already gone so far in laying open to my readers some of the

sentiments which I entertained, respecting Lord Byron's marriage, at a

time when, little foreseeing that I should ever become his biographer, I

was, of course, uninfluenced by the peculiar bias supposed to belong to

that task, it may still further, perhaps, be permitted me to extract

from my reply to the foregoing letter some sentences of explanation

which its contents seemed to me to require.

"I had certainly no right to say any thing about the unluckiness of your

choice, though I rejoice now that I did, as it has drawn from you a

tribute which, however unaccountable and mysterious it renders the whole

affair, is highly honourable to both parties. What I meant in hinting a

doubt with respect to the object of your selection did not imply the

least impeachment of that perfect amiableness which the world, I find,

by common consent, allows to her. I only feared that she might have been

too perfect--too _precisely_ excellent--too matter-of-fact a paragon for

you to coalesce with comfortably; and that a person whose perfection

hung in more easy folds about her, whose brightness was softened down by

some of 'those fair defects which best conciliate love,' would, by

appealing more dependently to your protection, have stood a much better

chance with your good nature. All these suppositions, however, I have

been led into by my intense anxiety to acquit you of any thing like a

capricious abandonment of such a woman[93]; and, totally in the dark as

I am with respect to all but the fact of your separation, you cannot

conceive the solicitude, the fearful solicitude, with which I look

forward to a history of the transaction from your own lips when we

meet,--a history in which I am sure of, at least, _one_ virtue--manly

candour."

[Footnote 93: It will be perceived from this that I was as yet

unacquainted with the true circumstances of the transaction.]

* * * * *

With respect to the causes that may be supposed to have led to this

separation, it seems needless, with the characters of both parties

before our eyes, to go in quest of any very remote or mysterious reasons

to account for it. I have already, in some observations on the general

character of men of genius, endeavoured to point out those

peculiarities, both in disposition and habitudes, by which, in the far

greater number of instances, they have been found unfitted for domestic

happiness. Of these defects, (which are, as it were, the shadow that

genius casts, and too generally, it is to be feared, in proportion to

its stature,) Lord Byron could not, of course, fail to have inherited

his share, in common with all the painfully-gifted class to which he

belonged. How thoroughly, with respect to one attribute of this

temperament which he possessed,--one, that "sicklies o'er" the face of

happiness itself,--he was understood by the person most interested in

observing him, will appear from the following anecdote, as related by

himself.[94]

"People have wondered at the melancholy which runs through my writings.

Others have wondered at my personal gaiety. But I recollect once, after

an hour in which I had been sincerely and particularly gay and rather

brilliant, in company, my wife replying to me when I said (upon her

remarking my high spirits), 'And yet, Bell, I have been called and

miscalled melancholy--you must have seen how falsely, frequently?'--'No,

Byron,' she answered, 'it is not so: at heart you are the most

melancholy of mankind; and often when apparently gayest.'"

To these faults and sources of faults inherent, in his own sensitive

nature, he added also many of those which a long indulgence of self-will

generates,--the least compatible, of all others, (if not softened down,

as they were in him, by good nature,) with that system of mutual

concession and sacrifice by which the balance of domestic peace is

maintained. When we look back, indeed, to the unbridled career, of which

this marriage was meant to be the goal,--to the rapid and restless

course in which his life had run along, like a burning train, through a

series of wanderings, adventures, successes, and passions, the fever of

all which was still upon him, when, with the same headlong recklessness,

he rushed into this marriage,--it can but little surprise us that, in

the space of one short year, he should not have been able to recover

all at once from his bewilderment, or to settle down into that tame

level of conduct which the close observers of his every action required.

As well might it be expected that a steed like his own Mazeppa's,

"Wild as the wild deer and untaught,

With spur and bridle undefiled--

'Twas but a day he had been caught,"

should stand still, when reined, without chafing or champing the bit.

Even had the new condition of life into which he passed been one of

prosperity and smoothness, some time, as well as tolerance, must still

have been allowed for the subsiding of so excited a spirit into rest.

But, on the contrary, his marriage (from the reputation, no doubt, of

the lady, as an heiress,) was, at once, a signal for all the arrears and

claims of a long-accumulating state of embarrassment to explode upon

him;--his door was almost daily beset by duns, and his house nine times

during that year in possession of bailiffs[95]; while, in addition to

these anxieties and--what he felt still more--indignities of poverty,

he had also the pain of fancying, whether rightly or wrongly, that the

eyes of enemies and spies were upon him, even under his own roof, and

that his every hasty word and look were interpreted in the most

perverting light.

As, from the state of their means, his lady and he saw but little

society, his only relief from the thoughts which a life of such

embarrassment brought with it was in those avocations which his duty, as

a member of the Drury Lane Committee, imposed upon him. And here,--in

this most unlucky connection with the theatre,--one of the fatalities of

his short year of trial, as husband, lay. From the reputation which he

had previously acquired for gallantries, and the sort of reckless and

boyish levity to which--often in very "bitterness of soul"--he gave way,

it was not difficult to bring suspicion upon some of those acquaintances

which his frequent intercourse with the green-room induced him to form,

or even (as, in one instance, was the case,) to connect with his name

injuriously that of a person to whom he had scarcely ever addressed a

single word.

Notwithstanding, however, this ill-starred concurrence of

circumstances, which might have palliated any excesses either of temper

or conduct into which they drove him, it was, after all, I am persuaded,

to no such serious causes that the unfortunate alienation, which so soon

ended in disunion, is to be traced. "In all the marriages I have ever

seen," says Steele, "most of which have been unhappy ones, the great

cause of evil has proceeded from slight occasions;" and to this remark,

I think, the marriage under our consideration would not be found, upon

enquiry, to be an exception. Lord Byron himself, indeed, when at

Cephalonia, a short time before his death, seems to have expressed, in a

few words, the whole pith of the mystery. An English gentleman with whom

he was conversing on the subject of Lady Byron, having ventured to

enumerate to him the various causes he had heard alleged for the

separation, the noble poet, who had seemed much amused with their

absurdity and falsehood, said, after listening to them all,--"The

causes, my dear sir, were too simple to be easily found out."

In truth, the circumstances, so unexampled, that attended their

separation,--the last words of the parting wife to the husband being

those of the most playful affection, while the language of the deserted

husband towards the wife was in a strain, as the world knows, of

tenderest eulogy,--are in themselves a sufficient proof that, at the

time of their parting, there could have been no very deep sense of

injury on either side. It was not till afterwards that, in both bosoms,

the repulsive force came into operation,--when, to the party which had

taken the first decisive step in the strife, it became naturally a point

of pride to persevere in it with dignity, and this unbendingness

provoked, as naturally, in the haughty spirit of the other, a strong

feeling of resentment which overflowed, at last, in acrimony and scorn.

If there be any truth, however, in the principle, that they "never

pardon who have done the wrong," Lord Byron, who was, to the last,

disposed to reconciliation, proved so far, at least, his conscience to

have been unhaunted by any very disturbing consciousness of aggression.

But though it would have been difficult, perhaps, for the victims of

this strife, themselves, to have pointed out any single, or definite,

cause for their disunion,--beyond that general incompatibility which is

the canker of all such marriages,--the public, which seldom allows

itself to be at a fault on these occasions, was, as usual, ready with an

ample supply of reasons for the breach,--all tending to blacken the

already darkly painted character of the poet, and representing him, in

short, as a finished monster of cruelty and depravity. The reputation of

the object of his choice for every possible virtue, (a reputation which

had been, I doubt not, one of his own chief incentives to the marriage,

from the vanity, reprobate as he knew he was deemed, of being able to

win such a paragon,) was now turned against him by his assailants, not

only in the way of contrast with his own character, but as if the

excellences of the wife were proof positive of every enormity they chose

to charge upon the husband.

Meanwhile, the unmoved silence of the lady herself, (from motives, it

is but fair to suppose, of generosity and delicacy,) under the repeated

demands made for a specification of her charges against him, left to

malice and imagination the fullest range for their combined industry. It

was accordingly stated, and almost universally believed, that the noble

lord's second proposal to Miss Milbanke had been but with a view to

revenge himself for the slight inflicted by her refusal of the first,

and that he himself had confessed so much to her on their way from

church. At the time when, as the reader has seen from his own honey-moon

letters, he was, with all the good will in the world, imagining himself

into happiness, and even boasting, in the pride of his fancy, that if

marriage were to be upon _lease_, he would gladly renew his own for a

term of ninety-nine years,--at this very time, according to these

veracious chroniclers, he was employed in darkly following up the

aforesaid scheme of revenge, and tormenting his lady by all sorts of

unmanly cruelties,--such as firing off pistols, to frighten her as she

lay in bed[96], and other such freaks.

To the falsehoods concerning his green-room intimacies, and

particularly with respect to one beautiful actress, with whom, in

reality, he had hardly ever exchanged a single word, I have already

adverted; and the extreme confidence with which this tale was circulated

and believed affords no unfair specimen of the sort of evidence with

which the public, in all such fits of moral wrath, is satisfied. It is,

at the same time, very far from my intention to allege that, in the

course of the noble poet's intercourse with the theatre, he was not

sometimes led into a line of acquaintance and converse, unbefitting, if

not dangerous to, the steadiness of married life. But the imputations

against him on this head were (as far as affected his conjugal

character) not the less unfounded,--as the sole case in which he

afforded any thing like _real_ grounds for such an accusation did not

take place till _after_ the period of the separation.

Not content with such ordinary and tangible charges, the tongue of

rumour was emboldened to proceed still further; and, presuming upon the

mysterious silence maintained by one of the parties, ventured to throw

out dark hints and vague insinuations, of which the fancy of every

hearer was left to fill up the outline as he pleased. In consequence of

all this exaggeration, such an outcry was now raised against Lord Byron

as, in no case of private life, perhaps, was ever before witnessed; nor

had the whole amount of fame which he had gathered, in the course of the

last four years, much exceeded in proportion the reproach and obloquy

that were now, within the space of a few weeks, showered upon him. In

addition to the many who, no doubt, conscientiously believed and

reprobated what they had but too much right, whether viewing him as poet

or man of fashion, to consider credible excesses, there were also

actively on the alert that large class of persons who seem to hold

violence against the vices of others to be equivalent to virtue in

themselves, together with all those natural haters of success who,

having long sickened under the splendour of the _poet_, were now

enabled, in the guise of champions for innocence, to wreak their spite

on the _man_. In every various form of paragraph, pamphlet, and

caricature, both his character and person were held up to

odium[97];--hardly a voice was raised, or at least listened to, in his

behalf; and though a few faithful friends remained unshaken by his side,

the utter hopelessness of stemming the torrent was felt as well by them

as by himself, and, after an effort or two to gain a fair hearing, they

submitted in silence. Among the few attempts made by himself towards

confuting his calumniators was an appeal (such as the following short

letter contains) to some of those persons with whom he had been in the

habit of living familiarly.

[Footnote 94: MS.--"Detached Thoughts."]

[Footnote 95: An anecdote connected with one of these occasions is thus

related in the Journal just referred to:--

"When the bailiff (for I have seen most kinds of life) came upon me in

1815 to seize my chattels, (being a peer of parliament, my person was

beyond him,) being curious (as is my habit), I first asked him "what

extents elsewhere he had for government?" upon which he showed me one

upon _one house only_ for _seventy thousand pounds_! Next I asked him if

he had nothing for Sheridan? "Oh--Sheridan!" said he; "ay, I have this"

(pulling out a pocket-book, &c.); "but, my Lord, I have been in

Sheridan's house a twelvemonth at a time--a civil gentleman--knows how

to deal with _us_," &c. &c. &c. Our own business was then discussed,

which was none of the easiest for me at that time. But the man was

civil, and (what I valued more) communicative. I had met many of his

brethren, years before, in affairs of my friends, (commoners, that is,)

but this was the first (or second) on my own account.--A civil man;

fee'd accordingly; probably he anticipated as much."]

[Footnote 96: For this story, however, there was so far a foundation

that the practice to which he had accustomed himself from boyhood, of

having loaded pistols always near him at night, was considered so

strange a propensity as to be included in that list of symptoms

(sixteen, I believe, in number,) which were submitted to medical

opinion, in proof of his insanity. Another symptom was the emotion,

almost to hysterics, which he had exhibited on seeing Kean act Sir Giles

Overreach. But the most plausible of all the grounds, as he himself used

to allow, on which these articles of impeachment against his sanity were

drawn up, was an act of violence committed by him on a favourite old

watch that had been his companion from boyhood, and had gone with him to

Greece. In a fit of vexation and rage, brought on by some of those

humiliating embarrassments to which he was now almost daily a prey, he

furiously dashed this watch upon the hearth, and ground it to pieces

among the ashes with the poker.]

[Footnote 97: Of the abuse lavished upon him, the following extract from

a poem, published at this time, will give some idea:--

"From native England, that endured too long

The ceaseless burden of his impious song;

His mad career of crimes and follies run,

And grey in vice, when life was scarce begun;

He goes, in foreign lands prepared to find

A life more suited to his guilty mind;

Where other climes new pleasures may supply

For that pall'd taste, and that unhallow'd eye;--

Wisely he seeks some yet untrodden shore,

For those who know him less may prize him more."

In a rhyming pamphlet, too, entitled "A Poetical Epistle from Delia,

addressed to Lord Byron," the writer thus charitably expresses

herself:--

"Hopeless of peace below, and, shuddering thought!

Far from that Heav'n, denied, if never sought,

Thy light a beacon--a reproach thy name--

Thy memory "damn'd to everlasting fame,"

Shunn'd by the wise, admired by fools alone--

The good shall mourn thee--and the Muse disown."

]

* * * * *

Life of Lord Byron, Vol. 3 With His Letters and Journals · 第 122 / 165 题