LETTER 233. TO MR. MOORE.

"February 29. 1816.

"I have not answered your letter for a time; and, at present, the

reply to part of it might extend to such a length, that I shall

delay it till it can be made in person, and then I will shorten it

as much as I can.

"In the mean time, I am at war 'with all the world and his wife;'

or rather, 'all the world and _my_ wife' are at war with me, and

have not yet crushed me,--whatever they _may_ do. I don't know that

in the course of a hair-breadth existence I was ever, at home or

abroad, in a situation so completely uprooting of present pleasure,

or rational hope for the future, as this same. I say this, because

I think so, and feel it. But I shall not sink under it the more for

that mode of considering the question--I have made up my mind.

"By the way, however, you must not believe all you hear on the

subject; and don't attempt to defend me. If you succeeded in that,

it would be a mortal, or an immortal, offence--who can bear

refutation? I have but a very short answer for those whom it

concerns; and all the activity of myself and some vigorous friends

have not yet fixed on any tangible ground or personage, on which or

with whom I can discuss matters, in a summary way, with a fair

pretext;--though I nearly had _nailed one_ yesterday, but he evaded

by--what was judged by others--a satisfactory explanation. I speak

of _circulators_--against whom I have no enmity, though I must act

according to the common code of usage, when I hit upon those of the

serious order.

"Now for other matters--poesy, for instance. Leigh Hunt's poem is a

devilish good one--quaint, here and there, but with the substratum

of originality, and with poetry about it, that will stand the test.

I do not say this because he has inscribed it to me, which I am

sorry for, as I should otherwise have begged you to review it in

the Edinburgh.[91] It is really deserving of much praise, and a

favourable critique in the E.R. would but do it justice, and set it

up before the public eye where it ought to be.

"How are you? and where? I have not the most distant idea what I am

going to do myself, or with myself--or where--or what. I had, a few

weeks ago, some things to say that would have made you laugh; but

they tell me now that I must not laugh, and so I have been very

serious--and am.

"I have not been very well--with a _liver_ complaint--but am much

better within the last fortnight, though still under Iatrical

advice. I have latterly seen a little of * * * *

"I must go and dress to dine. My little girl is in the country,

and, they tell me, is a very fine child, and now nearly three

months old. Lady Noel (my mother-in-law, or, rather, _at_ law) is

at present overlooking it. Her daughter (Miss Milbanke that was)

is, I believe, in London with her father. A Mrs. C. (now a kind of

housekeeper and spy of Lady N.'s) who, in her better days, was a

washerwoman, is supposed to be--by the learned--very much the

occult cause of our late domestic discrepancies.

"In all this business, I am the sorriest for Sir Ralph. He and I

are equally punished, though _magis pares quam similes_ in our

affliction. Yet it is hard for both to suffer for the fault of one,

and so it is--I shall be separated from my wife; he will retain

his.

"Ever," &c.

[Footnote 91: My reply to this part of his letter was, I find, as

follows:--"With respect to Hunt's poem, though it is, I own, full of

beauties, and though I like himself sincerely, I really could not

undertake to praise it _seriously_. There is so much of the _quizzible_

in all he writes, that I never can put on the proper pathetic face in

reading him."]

* * * * *

In my reply to this letter, written a few days after, there is a passage

which (though containing an opinion it might have been more prudent,

perhaps, to conceal,) I feel myself called upon to extract on account of

the singularly generous avowal,--honourable alike to both the parties in

this unhappy affair,--which it was the means of drawing from Lord Byron.

The following are my words:--"I am much in the same state as yourself

with respect to the subject of your letter, my mind being so full of

things which I don't know how to write about, that _I_ too must defer

the greater part of them till we meet in May, when I shall put you

fairly on your trial for all crimes and misdemeanors. In the mean time,

you will not be at a loss for judges, nor executioners either, if they

could have their will. The world, in their generous ardour to take what

they call the weaker side, soon contrive to make it most formidably the

strongest. Most sincerely do I grieve at what has happened. It has upset

all my wishes and theories as to the influence of marriage on your life;

for, instead of bringing you, as I expected, into something like a

regular orbit, it has only cast you off again into infinite space, and

left you, I fear, in a far worse state than it found you. As to

defending you, the only person with whom I have yet attempted this task

is myself; and, considering the little I know upon the subject, (or

rather, perhaps, _owing_ to this cause,) I have hitherto done it with

very tolerable success. After all, your _choice_ was the misfortune. I

never liked,--but I'm here wandering into the [Greek: aporrêta], and so

must change the subject for a far pleasanter one, your last new poems,

which," &c. &c.

The return of post brought me the following answer, which, while it

raises our admiration of the generous candour of the writer, but adds to

the sadness and strangeness of the whole transaction.

* * * * *

Life of Lord Byron, Vol. 3 With His Letters and Journals · 第 121 / 165 题