CHAPTER II.

_HOW TO CHOOSE A BOW, AND HOW TO USE AND PRESERVE IT WHEN CHOSEN_

The next point to be considered is the strength of the bow to be chosen;

and respecting this, in the first place, the bow must be completely

under the shooter's command--within it, but not much below it. One of

the greatest mistakes young archers (and many old ones too) commit is

that they _will_ use bows that are too strong for them. In fact, there

are but few to whom, at one or other period of their archery career,

this remark has not applied. The desire to be considered strong appears

to be the moving agent to this curious hallucination; as if a man did

not rather expose his weakness by straining at a bow evidently beyond

his strength, thereby calling attention to that weakness, than by using

a lighter one with grace and ease, which always give the idea of force,

vigour, and power. Another incentive to the use of strong bows is the

passion for sending down the arrows sharp and low, and the consequent

employment of powerful bows to accomplish this; the which is perhaps a

greater mistake than the other, for it is not so much the strength of

the bow as the perfect command of it that enables the archer to obtain

this desideratum. The question is not so much what a man can pull as

what he can loose; and he will without doubt obtain a lower flight of

arrow by a lighter power of bow under his command, than he will by a

stronger one beyond his proper management. This mania for strong bows

has destroyed many a promising archer, in an archery sense of the term.

Not only did one of the best shots of his day, a winner of the second

and first prizes at successive Grand National Meetings, dwindle beneath

mediocrity in accuracy through this infatuation, but another brought

himself to death's door by a dangerous illness of about a year's

duration, by injury to his physical powers, brought on by the same

failing, only carried to a much greater excess. And, after all, the

thing so desired is not always thus attained.

Let the reader attend any Grand National Archery Meeting, and let him

observe some fifty or so picked shots of the country arranged at the

targets, and contending with all their might for the prizes of honour

and skill. Whose arrows fly down the sharpest, steadiest, and keenest?

Are they those of the archers who use the strongest bows? Not at

all. Behold that archer from an Eastern county just stepping so

unpretendingly forward to deliver his shafts. See! with what grace and

ease the whole thing is done!--no straining, no contortions there! Mark

the flight of his arrows--how keen, and low, and to the mark they fly!

None fly sharper, few so sharp. And what is the strength of that

beautiful self-yew bow which he holds in his hand? Scarce 50 lbs.! And

yet the pace of his shaft is unsurpassed by any; and it is close upon

five shillings in weight too. There is another. Mark his strength and

muscular power! Possibly a bow of 80 lbs. would be within his pull; yet

he knows better than to use any such, when the prizes are awarded to

skill, not brute force. The bow he employs is but 48 lbs.; yet how

steady and true is the flight of his arrow! And so on all through the

meeting: it will be found that it is not the strongest bows, but those

that are under the perfect command of their owners, that do their work

the best.

Inasmuch, then, as the proper flight of an arrow from any bow depends

almost entirely upon the way in which it is loosed, the strength of the

bow must not be regulated by the mere muscular powers of the individual

archer; for he may be able to draw even a 29-inch arrow to the head in

a very powerful bow without being able during a match to loose steadily

a bow of more than 50 lbs. Not the power of drawing, but of loosing

steadily, must therefore be the guide here. The bow must be within this

loosing power, but also well up to it; for it is almost as bad to be

_under_- as _over_-bowed. The evils attendant upon being over-bowed are

various: the left (bow) arm, wrist, and elbow, the fingers of the right

(loosing) hand and its wrist, are strained and rendered unsteady; the

pull becomes uncertain and wavering, and is never twice alike; the whole

system is overworked and wearied; and, besides this, the mind is

depressed by ill-success; the entire result is disappointment and

failure. On the other hand, care must be taken not to fall into the

opposite extreme of being under-bowed, as in this case the loose becomes

difficult, and generally unsteady and unequal. The weight of the bows

now in general use varies from 45 lbs. to 54 lbs., stronger ones forming

the exception; and the lowest of these weights is ample for the

distances now usually shot. Each archer must therefore find out how much

he can draw with ease and loose with steadiness throughout a day's

shooting, and choose accordingly. If a beginner, 50 lbs. is probably the

outside weight with which he should commence; a few pounds less, in most

cases, would even be better for the starting-point. As lately as twenty

years ago bows were very carelessly marked in the indication of their

strength, many bows being marked as much as 10 lbs. above their actual

measure; but in the present day all the bowmakers incline towards the

custom of marking a new bow to weigh rather less, perhaps by 3 lbs.,

than its actual weight. The reason of this is that in the opinion of the

marker the bow will arrive at the strength marked in the course of use.

It is indeed a very rare case when a new bow does not with use get

somewhat weaker.

Besides keeping the bows for his own use mostly of the same description,

every archer should also keep them of just about the same weight; and

if he shoot much he should possess at the fewest three, as much alike as

possible, and use them alternately. This will prove an economy in the

end, as each will have time to recover its elasticity, and will thus

last a much longer time. It is an agreeable feature in bows that they

have considerable facility in recovery from the effects of hard work.

This fact may be easily tested by weighing a bow on a steelyard before

and after shooting a single York round with it, when a difference of one

pound or more will be found in the strength of it, more particularly if

the day be hot; but with a few days' rest this lost power will be

regained by the bow.

In the choice of a bow a beginner should secure the assistance of an

experienced friend, or content himself with an unambitious investment in

a cheap specimen of backed-bow or a self-lance, on which he may safely

expend his inexperience. When an archer is sufficiently advanced to know

the sort and weight of bow that best suits him, let him go to the maker

he prefers, and name the price he can afford to give--the prices of

trustworthy self-yews vary from twenty to five guineas, of yew-backed

yews from five to three guineas, and of other backed bows from three

guineas to thirty shillings; whilst self-lance bows may be procured for

as little as twelve shillings--and he will soon find what choice there

is for him. If there appears one likely to suit, let him first examine

the bow to see that there be no _knots_, _curls_, _pins_, _splinters_,

_chrysals_, or other objectionable flaws; then let him string it, and,

placing the lower end on the ground in such a position that the whole of

the string shall be under his eye and uppermost, let him notice whether

the bow be perfectly straight. If it be so, the bow, so balanced between

the ground at the lower and a finger at the upper end, will appear

symmetrically divided by the string into two parts. Should there appear

to be more on one side of the string than on the other in either limb,

the bow is not straight, and should be rejected. A bow is said to have a

_cast_ when it is tilted in its back out of the perpendicular to the

plane passing through the string and the longitudinal centre of the bow.

Any bow that has this fault should also be rejected. This fault, if it

should happen to exist, will be easily detected by reversing the

position of the bow just previously described, i.e. by holding the bow

as before, but with the back upwards. The next step is to watch the bow

as it is drawn up, so as to be able to judge whether it bend evenly in

both its limbs and show no sign of weakness in any particular point. The

upper limb, as before stated, being the longest, should appear to bend a

trifle the most, so that the whole may be symmetrical, when considered

as bending from the real centre. It may next be tested, to ascertain

whether it be a kicker; thus the string must be drawn up six inches or

so and then loosed (of course without an arrow). If the bow have the

fault of kicking ever so little, experience will easily detect it by the

jolt in the hand. But on no account in this experiment should the string

(without an arrow) be fully drawn and loosed. Care should be taken that

the bow be sufficiently long for its strength. What has hitherto been

said applies to all bows; but in self-bows attention must be paid to the

straightness of the feathering of the wood. As a general rule, the

lightest wood in a yew-bow will have the quickest cast, and the heaviest

will make the most lasting implement. Between two bows of the same

strength and length, the one being slight and the other bulky, there

will be about the same difference as between a thoroughbred and a

cart-horse. Therefore the preference should be given to bows that are

light and slight for their strength. Light-coloured and dark yew make

equally good bows, though most prefer the dark colour for choice. Fine

and more open grain in yew are also equally good, but the finer is more

scarce. If there be no bow suitable--i.e. none of the right weight--let

the choice fall upon the best bow of greater power, and let it be

reduced. Failing this, the purchaser may select an unfinished stave and

have it made to his own pattern; but it is not easy to foretell how a

stave will make up.

There remains one point about a bow, hitherto unnoticed, and this is its

section, as to shape. This may vary, being broad and flat across its

back, or the contrary--deep and pointed in the belly. Here again

extremes should be avoided--the bow should in shape be neither too flat

nor too deep. If it be an inch or so across the back just above the

handle, it should also have about the same measurement through from back

to belly. This much being granted, it is further declared that the back

should be almost as flat and angular as possible, showing that it has

been reduced as little as may be after the removal of the bark; but the

belly should be rounded; and as the back should not be reduced in its

depth towards the horns, and should not get too narrow across, it will

follow that the chief reduction, to arrive at the proper curvature when

the bow is drawn, must be in the belly, and therefore towards the horn.

A well-shaped bow will in measurement become somewhat shallower from

back to belly than it is across the back as it advances towards the

horns.

Bows are broken from several causes: by means of neglected chrysals in

the belly, or splinters in the back; by a jerking, uneven, or crooked

style of drawing; by dwelling over-long on the point of aim after the

arrow is fully drawn; by the breaking of the string; by damp, and

oftentimes by carelessness; and even by thoughtlessness. Bows, moreover,

may be broken on the steelyard in the weighing of them. A few years ago,

when the Americans first took up archery very keenly, one of their

novices wrote to a prominent English archer saying that he had broken

nearly seventy bows in a couple of years, and asking the reason. He was

told that he must either keep his bows in a damp place or the bows must

be very bad ones, or else (to which view the writer inclined) he must be

in the habit of stringing them the reverse way with the belly outwards.

This would certainly have a fatal effect, but it is true that the

Americans bought a number of very bad bows about that time from inferior

makers in England. Whenever chrysals appear they must be carefully

watched, and, as has already been said, if they become serious, a new

belly must be added. This will not be a serious disfigurement, even to a

self-yew bow. A splinter should be glued and lapped at once, but no one

nowadays seems to care to have the covering patch painted as formerly,

to represent as nearly as possible the colours of the different parts of

the bow. Care should be taken not to stab the belly of the bow with the

point of the arrow when nocking it; and the dents in the back of the bow

made with the arrow as it is carelessly pulled out of the target should

be avoided. A glove-button will often injure the back of the bow whilst

it is being strung. As other ornaments--buttons, buckles, &c.--may also

inflict disfigurements, it is better to avoid their presence as far as

possible. Breakages from a bad style of drawing, or from dwelling too

long on the aim, can only be avoided by adopting a better and more

rational method. In order to avoid fracture through the breaking of

strings, any string that shows signs of failure from too much wear or

otherwise should be discarded; and strings that are too stiff, too hard,

and too thin should be avoided. If a string break when the arrow is

fully or almost drawn, there is but little hope for the bow; but if it

break in the recoil after the arrow is shot, which fortunately is more

frequently the case, the bow will seldom suffer. Yet if after the bow is

strung the archer should observe that the string is no longer

trustworthy, and decide to discard it, he should on no account cut it

whilst the bow is braced, as the result of so doing will be an almost

certain fracture. If the string be looped at both ends and the loop at

either end be made too large, so that it slip off the nock in stringing,

the bow may break, so that an archer who makes his own loops at the

lower end of the string must be careful not to make them too loose.

Breakage from damp is little to be feared in self-bows, except in

localities where it is exceptionally moist, or, after long neglect,

when damp has taken possession of the joint in the handle. In these

cases single staves only are safe. Amongst backed bows there is much

mortality from this cause. Commonly, it will be the lower limb that will

fail, as that is most exposed to damp, arising either from the ground

whilst shooting, or from the floor when put away. If the bow has been

used in damp weather it should be carefully dried and rubbed with waxed

flannel or cloth. A waterproof case, an 'Ascham' raised an inch or so

above the floor in a dry room, and the bow hung up, not resting on its

lower horn, are the best-known precautions. Half an inch of lapping,

glued and varnished, above and below the joint of the horn is also a

safe precaution against damp; also an occasional narrow lap in the

course of the limb will assist to 'fast bind, fast find.' As regards the

danger of carelessness, bows have been broken through attempts to string

them the wrong way, or by using them upside down; and thoughtlessness

will lead the inexperienced to attempt to bring a bow that follows the

string upright, to its infinite peril. In such cases the verdict of

'Serve him right' should be brought against the offender if he be the

owner. In weighing a bow on the steelyard care must be taken to see that

the peg indicating the length to be drawn be at the right point;

otherwise a lady's bow, for instance, may be destroyed in the mistaken

attempt to pull it up twenty-eight inches, or three inches too much.

It has already been stated that a belly much injured by chrysals may be

replaced by a new belly; any incurable failure of the back may also be

cured by its renewal. A weak bow or limb may also be strengthened by

these means. Also, if either limb be broken or irretrievably damaged,

and the remaining one be sound, and worth the expense, another limb may

be successfully grafted on to the old one. If possible, let this be an

old limb also, as the combination of new and old wood is not always

satisfactory; the former (though well seasoned, being unseasoned by

use), being more yielding, is apt after a little use to lose its

relative strength, and so spoil the proper balance of the bow. This

grafting of one broken limb upon another may be carried to the length of

grafting together two limbs of different sorts. Mr. P. Muir, who was as

good a bowyer as he was an accurate shot, had a favourite bow, that did

him good service in 1865 at Clifton, when he took the third place at the

Grand National Archery Meeting. This bow in one limb was yew-backed yew,

and in the other lance backed with hickory. A bow that is weak in the

centre, and not sufficiently strong to allow of the ends being further

reduced, may be brought to the required shape, and strengthened by the

addition of a short belly.

With regard to unstringing the bow during the shooting, say, of a York

Round of 144 arrows, at the three distances, a good bow will not need

it, if the shooting be moderately quick, excepting at the end of each of

the distances. If there happen to be many shooters, or very slow ones,

it may be unstrung after every three or four double ends; and of course

it should be unstrung whenever an interruption of the shooting may occur

from rain, or any other cause; but it certainly appears unnecessary to

unstring the bow after each three shots, as this is an equally

uncalled-for strain upon the muscles of the archer and relief to the

grain of the wood. In a discussion on this subject, however, between Mr.

James Spedding and Mr. P. Muir, the latter maintained that to be

unstrung at each end was as agreeable to the bow as to rest on a

camp-stool was to the archer. Some archers contend that it is better to

have the bow strung some few minutes before the commencement of the

shooting.

All that has been said respecting men's bows, with the exception of

strength and length, applies equally to those used by ladies. The usual

strength of these latter varies from 24 lbs. to 30 lbs. In length they

should not be less than five feet. The usual length of a lady's arrow

being twenty-five inches, whilst that of a gentleman is twenty-eight

inches, it appears that, when fully drawn, a lady's bow must be bent

more in proportion to its length than that of a gentleman. The

proportion between the bows being as 5 to 6, whilst that of the arrows

is as 6-1/4 to 7; yet ladies' bows appear to be quite capable of bearing

this extra strain safely.

As bows of three pieces are seldom to be met with manufactured for the

use of ladies, their choice of weapons is limited to self-yews,

yew-backed yews, yew backed with hickory, and lance backed with hickory;

also self-lance bows for beginners, &c. Ladies' bows of snake and other

hard woods are still to be met with; but they are so vastly inferior to

those above-mentioned that it is scarcely necessary to refer to them.

It is too common a practice amongst archers to throw the consequences of

their own faults upon the bowmakers, accusing the weapon of being the

cause of their failures, instead of blaming their own carelessness or

want of skill. But, before this can be justly done, let each be quite

certain that he has chosen his bow with care, and kept it with care; if

otherwise, any accidents occurring are, ten to one, more likely to be

the result of his own fault than that of the bowmaker.

The theory and practice of archery · 第 2 / 16 章