[173:4] Claudia, the wife of Pudens, supposed to be mentioned 2 Tim. iv.

21, is said to have been a Briton by birth. See Fuller's "Church History

of Britain," vol. i. p. 11; Edit. London, 1837.

[173:5] Euseb. ii. 16.

[173:6] Acts ii. 10.

[174:1] Acts ii. 9, 11.

[174:2] See in Cave's "Fathers," Bartholomew, Matthew, and Thomas.

[175:1] 1 Cor. vi. 9-11.

[175:2] Prov. xviii. 24.

[177:1] John xiv. 26.

[177:2] John xvi. 13.

[177:3] See Irenaeus, "Adv. Haeres.," iii. 1; and Euseb. vi. 14.

[177:4] It is probable that these three Gospels were written nearly at

the same time. When Luke wrote, he does not seem to have been aware of

the existence of any other Gospel. See Luke i. 4.

[177:5] Origen, "Dial, de Recta in Deum Fide," sec. i. tom. i. p. 806;

Edit. Delarue. Paris, 1733. See Whitby's "Preface to Luke." There is

good reason to believe that the "young man" mentioned Mark xiv. 51, 52,

was no other than Mark himself (Davidson's "Introduction to the New

Testament," i. 139); and if so, we have thus additional evidence that

the evangelist had enjoyed the advantages of our Lord's ministry. He has

always been reputed the founder of the Church of Alexandria, and the

testimony of Origen to the fact that he was one of the Seventy is

therefore of special value; as the Alexandrian presbyter was, no doubt,

well acquainted with the traditions of the Church of the Egyptian

metropolis.

[178:1] Acts i. 21.

[178:2] Luke i. 2.

[178:3] Matt. ix. 9, x. 3.

[178:4] Mark xiv. 71.

[178:5] Luke xxiv. 25.

[178:6] John xxi. 23.

[178:7] Matt. xxviii. 19.

[179:1] Mark ix. 15.

[179:2] Luke x. 1.

[179:3] John xiv., xv., xvi., xvii.

[179:4] See Horne's "Introduction," ii. 173. Sixth Edition.

[180:1] See Baumgarten on Acts, vii., viii., ix., xiii.

[180:2] Period i. sec. i. chap. 7, 8, 9.

[180:3] Horne, iv. 359.

[181:1] See Wordsworth "On the Canon," Lectures viii. ix.

[181:2] Prov. xxx. 5.

[181:3] This designation is not found in the most ancient manuscripts.

Thus, in the very ancient "Recension of the Four Gospels in Syriac,"

recently edited by Dr Cureton, we have simply--"Gospel of Mark"--"Gospel

of John," &c. See p. 6, Preface. See also any ordinary edition of the

Greek Testament.

[181:4] Horne, ii. 174.

[182:1] Titus iii. 12.

[182:2] Some, however, assign to it a much earlier date. See Davidson's

"Introduction to the New Testament," iii. 320.

[182:3] See Period i. sec. i. chap. 10, p. 158.

[182:4] See Wordsworth "On the Canon," p. 273.

[182:5] See Davidson's "Introduction," iii. 464, 491.

[182:6] Irenaeus, v. 30. Euseb. iii. 18.

[182:7] See Wordsworth "On the Canon," p. 157, 160, 249.

[182:8] Justin Martyr, ap. i. 67.

[182:9] 2 Pet. iii. 16

[183:1] Wordsworth "On the Canon," p. 205.

[183:2] "The allusions to the Epistle to the Hebrews are so numerous

that it is not too much to say that it was wholly transfused into

Clement's mind."--_Westcott on the Canon_, p. 32. See also Euseb. iii.

38.

[183:3] Wordsworth "On the Canon," p. 249.

[183:4] "The word ([Greek: graphê]) translated _Scripture_, which

properly means simply _a writing_, occurs fifty times in the New

Testament; and in all these fifty places, it is applied to the writings

of the Old and New Testament, and _to no other_."--Wordsworth, p. 185,

186.

[183:5] Wordsworth, p. 249, 250.

[184:1] See Davidson's "Introduction," iii. 540-550.

[184:2] See Horne's "Introduction," ii. 168. The author of the present

division into chapters is said to have been Hugo de Sancto Caro, a

learned writer who flourished about the middle of the thirteenth

century. The New Testament was first divided into verses by Robert

Stephens in 1551. The Geneva Bible was the first English version of the

Scriptures into which these divisions of Stephens were introduced.

[184:3] Horne, ii. 169.

[185:1] John v. 39; 2 Tim. iii. 15.

[185:2] Rev. i. 3. See also 2 Peter i. 19.

[185:3] Paul's epistles were often written with the hand of another. See

Rom. xvi. 22; 2 Thess. iii. 17.

[186:1] Ps. xii. 6.

[186:2] The epistle to Diognetus may have been written in the first

century, but it is commonly referred to a later date.

[186:3] He speaks of the Church of Corinth at the time as "most ancient"

(§ 47), and refers apparently to the Domitian persecution. See Euseb.

iii. 15, 16.

[186:4] Tertullian also illustrates the resurrection by the story of the

phoenix, "De Resurrec. Carn." c. 13.

[187:1] Clement's "Epistle to the Corinthians," § 25. The fragment of

the second epistle is not generally considered genuine.

[189:1] Matt. v. 17.

[189:2] 2 Tim. i. 10.

[189:3] Matt. xvi. 16; John i. 41.

[189:4] Luke xxiv. 19, 21; John i. 49.

[189:5] Matt. xvi. 21, 22; John xii. 34.

[189:6] Mark xv. 43; Luke ii. 38.

[189:7] John iv. 20-25.

[189:8] John xix. 12.

[189:9] Matt. ii. 2, 3, xx. 21; John vi. 15.

[190:1] Acts i. 6.

[190:2] Luke xxiv. 45.

[190:3] Luke xxiv. 44.

[190:4] Acts x. 34, 35.

[190:5] Acts xi. 3, 17.

[190:6] Heb. x. 1, 14, 18.

[190:7] Period i. sec. ii. chap. 1.

[191:1] Mark vii. 7-9.

[191:2] Matt. iv. 1-10, xii. 3, 5, 7; Mark xii. 26.

[191:3] John v. 39.

[191:4] Acts ii. 14-36.

[191:5] 2 Tim. iii. 15.

[191:6] 2 Tim. iii. 16, 17.

[191:7] Matt. xxii. 43, 45; Gal. iii. 16; Heb. ii. 8, 11.

[191:8] John x. 34, 35; Heb. viii. 13.

[191:9] Acts xxviii. 25; Heb. iii. 7.

[191:10] Heb. i. 1, 2; Matt. i. 22, ii. 15.

[192:1] 1 Cor. ii. 13.

[192:2] 2 Tim. iii. 16.

[192:3] Gen. iii. 15; Ps. cxxx. 7, 8; Dan. ix. 24.

[192:4] Ps. xcviii. 1-4; Isa. ix. 6.

[192:5] Rom. iii. 19.

[192:6] Eph. ii. 1.

[192:7] John v. 24.

[192:8] Rev. iii. 20.

[192:9] Heb. xi. 27.

[193:1] Heb. xii. 2.

[193:2] Heb. vi. 18.

[193:3] 1 Pet. ii. 3.

[193:4] Rom. v. 1.

[193:5] Acts xv. 9.

[193:6] 1 John v. 4.

[193:7] Rom. v. 2.

[193:8] Heb. xi. 1.

[193:9] John xx. 31.

[193:10] John i. 29.

[193:11] Rom. x. 4.

[194:1] Eph. v. 23.

[194:2] Rev. xvii. 14.

[194:3] Col. i. 27.

[194:4] Ps. cxlvi. 8, compared with John ix. 32, 33.

[194:5] Job ix. 8, compared with Matt. xiv. 25.

[194:6] Ps. cvii. 29, compared with Luke viii. 24.

[194:7] Amos iv. 13, compared with Matt. xii. 25, and John ii. 24, 25.

[194:8] Tit. ii. 14.

[194:9] Mark ii. 5-10.

[194:10] Eph. v. 26.

[194:11] Acts xvi. 14; Luke xxiv. 45.

[194:12] Rev. ii. 23.

[194:13] Mal. iii. i.

[194:14] Isa. xl. 3, and vi. 1, compared with John xii. 38-41.

[194:15] Isa. xl. 3, 9; Ps. xlv. 6.

[194:16] Ps. ii. 12.

[194:17] Ps. lxxii. 15.

[194:18] Ps. ii. 12, compared with Ps. cxlvi. 3, 5, and Isa. xxvi. 4.

[194:19] John i. 49; Matt. xvi. 16, 17.

[194:20] Such as John xx. 28, xxi. 17.

[195:1] Luke xxiv. 27.

[195:2] 1 Cor. xii. 3.

[195:3] Rom. ix. 5.

[195:4] Eph. i. 12, 13; Matt. xii. 21.

[195:5] Col. iii. 24.

[195:6] Acts ix. 14; 1 Cor. i. 2.

[195:7] Rev. v. 11-13. Though modern criticism has shaken the credit of

some passages usually quoted in support of the Deity of Christ, such as

1 Tim. iii. 16, it is remarkable that it has discovered others equally

strong not now in the received text. See Lachmann's text of Col. ii. 2,

and 1 Pet. iii. 15.

[196:1] Heb. ii. 14.

[196:2] Matt. xvi. 22.

[196:3] Luke xxiv. 46.

[196:4] Rom. iii. 26.

[197:1] Heb. ix. 12.

[197:2] 1 Cor. i. 24.

[197:3] Phil. ii. 13.

[197:4] Eph. i. 4-6.

[197:5] Matt, xxviii. 19; John x. 30, xv. 26.

[198:1] Eph. iv. 5.

[198:2] See Bingham, iii. 323-327.

[198:3] Acts viii. 37; 1 Pet. iii. 21.

[198:4] Matt. i. 21.

[199:1] Prov. viii. 11.

[199:2] Phil. iv. 11-14.

[200:1] "[Greek: Hairesis] autem Graecé, ab electione dicitur: quòd

scilicet eam sibi unusquisque eligat disciplinam, quam putat esse

meliorem."--_Hieronymus in Epist. ad Galat._ c. 5. See also Tertullian,

"De Praescrip." c. 6.

[200:2] "Life," Section 2; "Antiq." xiii. 5, 9.

[200:3] Acts xxvi. 5.

[200:4] Acts xxiv. 5.

[200:5] Gal. v. 20.

[201:1] Eph. iv. 17, 18; Col. i. 13.

[201:2] John iii. 18, 19.

[201:3] Mosheim has overlooked this fact, and has, in consequence, been

betrayed into some false criticism when treating on this subject.

[201:4] Titus iii. 10.

[201:5] 2 Pet. ii. 1.

[202:1] Every one acquainted with the works of Philo Judaeus must be

aware that Jewish literature was now largely impregnated with pagan

philosophy.

[202:2] Col. ii. 8.

[202:3] 1 Tim. vi. 20.

[202:4] See Burton's "Inquiry into the Heresies of the Apostolic Age,"

pp. 314, 315. Also Mosheim's "Dissertation" appended to Cudworth, iii.

171.

[203:1] Col. i. 16, 17.

[204:1] From [Greek: dokeô], I appear.

[204:2] John i. 14.

[204:3] 1 John iv. 3.

[204:4] 1 John i. 1-3.

[204:5] 2 John 7.

[204:6] 1 Cor. xv. 12.

[204:7] 2 Tim. ii. 16-18.

[205:1] Acts viii. 9.

[205:2] Irenaeus, i. 23; Eusebius, ii. 13.

[205:3] Acts viii. 20-23.

[205:4] Acts viii. 9.

[205:5] Justin Martyr, "Apol." ii. 69. Edit. Paris, 1615.

[205:6] 1 Tim. i. 20; 2 Tim. i. 15, ii. 17, iv. 14.

[206:1] Irenaeus, i. 25, 26; Tertullian, "De Praescrip. Haeret." 33;

Epiphanius, "Haer." xxx. 2, lxix. 23.

[206:2] Irenaeus, iii. 3, 4.

[206:3] Irenaeus, iii. 11.

[206:4] Rev. ii. 6, 15.

[206:5] Acts vi. 5. Others conceive, however, that the name Nicolaitanes

is merely equivalent to Balaamites (as Balaam in Hebrew is nearly

equivalent to Nicolas in Greek, each word signifying _Ruler, or

Conqueror of the people_), and that the apostle does not here refer to

any party already known by this designation, but to all who, like

Balaam, were seducers of God's people. See Neander, "General History,"

ii. 159. Edinburgh edition, 1847.

[207:1] Rev. ii. 6, 15.

[207:2] Acts xxiii. 1, 6.

[207:3] 1 John ii. 19.

[207:4] Compare Jude 19, and Heb. x. 25.

[208:1] 1 Tim. i. 20.

[208:2] Rev. ii. 15.

[208:3] Hegesippus in Euseb., iv. 22.

[208:4] Eusebius, iv. 22.

[208:5] 1 Cor. xi. 19.

[209:1] James iii. 17.

[210:1] Luke xxiv. 21.

[210:2] Luke xxiv. 17, 22, 23.

[211:1] Acts xx. 7.

[211:2] Rev. i. 10, [Greek: hê kurtakê hêmera]. The day was ever

afterwards distinguished by this designation. See a letter from Dionysius

of Corinth in Eusebius, iv. 23. See also Kaye's "Clement of Alexandria,"

p. 418. The first day of the week is called "the Christian Sabbath" in

the Ethiopic version of the "Apostolical Constitutions." See Platt's

"Didascalia," p. 99. But these Constitutions are of comparatively late

origin.

[211:3] Matt. v. 17-19.

[211:4] Matt. iii. 15.

[211:5] Matt. xii. 3-5; Mark ii. 25, 26.

[211:6] Matt. xii. 7.

[211:7] Gen. ii. 3.

[212:1] Exod. xx. 1-17.

[212:2] Mark ii. 27.

[212:3] Matt. xxiv. 20.

[212:4] See Heb. xiii. 10, 15, 16; Ps. li. 17.

[212:5] Isa. lvi. 6, 7. Compare with Isa. ii. 2.

[212:6] Mark ii. 28.

[212:7] John xx. 19, 26. According to the current style of speaking,"

after eight days" means _the eighth day after_. See Matt, xxvii. 63.

[213:1] Acts ii. 1. That the day of Pentecost was the first day of the

week appears from Lev. xxiii. 11, 15. The same inference may be drawn

from John xviii. 28, and xix. 31, compared with Lev. xxiii. 5, 6. See

also Schaff's "History of the Apostolic Church," i. p. 230, note, and

the authorities there quoted.

[213:2] In the same way the Eucharist is called the Lord's Supper:

[Greek: Kuriakon deipnon] (1 Cor. xi. 20). Thus also we speak of the

Lord's house, and the Lord's people.

[213:3] Heb. x. 25.

[213:4] 1 Cor. xvi. 1, 2.

[213:5] Isa. lxv. 17, 18.

[213:6] [Greek: Sabbatiamos]. See Owen "On the Hebrews," iv. 9.

[213:7] Heb. iv. 9, 10.

[213:8] Rom. xiv. 5.

[214:1] Col. ii. 16, 17.

[214:2] The ordinary temple service could scarcely be called

congregational. It was almost exclusively ceremonial and typical,

consisting of sacrificing, burning incense, and offering various

oblations. The worshippers generally prayed apart. See Luke i. 10,

xviii. 10, 11.

[215:1] See these eighteen prayers in Prideaux's "Connexions," i. 375,

and note. Bingham admits (Orig. iv. 194), that these are their _"most

ancient"_ forms of devotion; and, of course, if they were written after

the fall of Jerusalem, it follows that the Jews had no liturgy in the

days of our Lord. Had they then been limited to fixed forms, He would

scarcely have upbraided the Scribes and Pharisees for hypocritically

_"making long prayer"_ Matt, xxiii. 14.

[215:2] See Palmer's "Origines Liturgicae," i. pp. 44-92; and Clarkson's

"Discourse concerning Liturgies;" "Select Works," p. 342.

[215:3] Matt. vi. 9-13.

[215:4] 1 Thess. v. 18.

[215:5] Eph. vi. 18.

[215:6] Eph. vi. 18.

[215:7] Acts i. 24, 25, iv. 24-30.

[216:1] See Lightfoot's "Temple Service," ch. vii. sec. 2; "Works," ix.

56.

[216:2] Lightfoot's "Prospect of the Temple," ch. xxxiii.; "Works," ix.

384.

[216:3] The multitudes who assembled at the great festivals in the

temple could not well unite in one service. The wall of the building was

more than half a mile in circumference. See Lightfoot, ix. 217. There

were various courts and divisions in the building.

[216:4] Heb. ix. 9-12, x. 1; John ii. 19-21; 1 Pet. ii. 5.

[216:5] Vitringa, "De Synagoga," p. 203.

[216:6] Eph. v. 19. According to some, the Psalms were divided into

these three classes.

[216:7] Heb. xiii. 15.

[217:1] Bingham, ii. 482-484.

[217:2] Luke iv. 16, 17.

[217:3] Col. iv. 16; 1 Thess. v. 27.

[217:4] 1 Cor. xiv. 29. It would appear from this that only _two_ or

_three_ persons were permitted to speak at a meeting. By him that

"sitteth by" (verse 30), a doctor or teacher is meant. See Vitringa, "De

Synagoga," p. 600, and Matt. v. 1.

[217:5] 1 Cor. xiv. 27. The gift of "interpretation of tongues" (1 Cor.

xii. 10) was quite as wonderful as the gift of "divers kinds of tongues"

(1 Cor. xii. 10).

[218:1] Censers were introduced into the Church about the fourth or

fifth century. Bingham, ii. 454, 455.

[218:2] 1 Cor. xvi. 19; Col. iv. 15; Philem. 2.

[218:3] Matt. iii. 4.

[218:4] The rite of confirmation, as now practised, has no sanction in

the New Testament. The "baptisms" and "laying on of hands," mentioned

Heb. vi. 2, are obviously the "divers washings" of the Jews, and the

_imposition of hands on the heads of victims_. The laying on of the

apostles' hands conferred miraculous gifts. Had the apostle referred to

Christian baptism in Heb. vi. 2, he would have used the singular number.

[218:5] Lightfoot affirms that the use of baptism among the Israelites

was as ancient as the days of Jacob. He appeals in support of this view

to Gen. xxxv. 2. "Works," iv. 278.

[219:1] Lightfoot's "Works," iv. 409, 410. Edit. London, 1822.

[219:2] Acts x. 2, 44-48, xvi. 15, 33, xviii. 8; 1 Cor. i. 16.

[219:3] Acts viii. 37.

[219:4] Mark xvi. 16; John iii. 18.

[219:5] Matt. xix. 14; Luke xviii. 15. In the New Testament children are

described as uniting with their Christian parents in prayer (Acts xxi.

5). Were not these children baptized? They were no doubt brought up "in

the _nurture_ and admonition of the Lord" (Eph. vi. 4).

[220:1] Col. ii. 11, 12, 13.

[220:2] Col. i. 2, iii. 20; Eph. vi. 1, 4.

[220:3] 1 John ii. 12.

[220:4] Acts ii. 38, 39.

[220:5] 1 Cor. vii. 14. The absurdity of the interpretation according to

which _holy_ is here made to signify _legitimate_, is well exposed by Dr

Wilson in his treatise on "Infant Baptism," p. 513. London, 1848.

[220:6] This would, indeed, have been almost, if not altogether,

impossible. They would probably act somewhat differently at the river

Jordan and in such a place as the jail at Philippi.

[220:7] [Greek: Baptizô].

[221:1] Dr Wilson has demonstrated the incorrectness of Dr Carson's

statements on this subject. See his "Infant Baptism," p. 96.

[221:2] Wilson's "Infant Baptism," p. 157. In Titus iii. 5, 6, there is

something like a reference to this mode of baptism: "The washing of

regeneration and renewing of the Holy Ghost which _he shed_ (or _poured

out_) on us abundantly." [Greek: Ou execheen eph' hêmas plousiôs].

[221:3] In some cases, as at Jerusalem on the day of Pentecost, they do

not seem to have had the means of immersing their converts. See also

Acts x. 47. The text John iii. 23, indicates the difficulty of baptizing

by dipping.

[221:4] Isa. lii. 15; Ezek. xxxvi. 25; I Pet. i. 2; Heb. ix. 10;

Rev. i. 5.

[221:5] 1 Cor. v. 7, 8.

[221:6] Acts xx. 7.

[221:7] Acts xx. 7; 1 Cor. x. 16.

[222:1] It was in use before the end of the second century. See Kaye's

"Tertullian," p. 431, 451.

[222:2] 1 Cor. x. 17.

[222:3] 1 Cor. v. 11.

[222:4] See Lightfoot's "Works," iii. 242, and xi. 179. Vitringa

"De Synagoga," p. 550.

[222:5] Acts xx. 28.

[223:1] Heb. xiii. 17.

[223:2] Heb. xxi. 17.

[223:3] 1 Tim. iii. 5.

[223:4] 1 Tim. v. 19, 20.

[223:5] Heb. xiii. 17.

[223:6] 1 Cor. v. 1,13.

[223:7] 2 Cor. ii. 6.

[224:1] See Period I. section i. chap. v. p. 88.

[224:2] 1 Cor. v. 2, 6.

[224:3] 1 Cor. V. 3-5.

[224:4] 1 John v. 19, [Greek: en tô ponêrô].

[225:1] In the above passage respecting delivering unto Satan there may

be a reference to Job ii. 6, 7, and it may be that some bodily

affliction rested on the offender. In that case there would be here an

exercise of supernatural power on the part of Paul. According to

Tertullian, to deliver to Satan was simply to excommunicate. "De ceteris

dixit qui illis traditis Satanae, id est, extra ecclesiam projectis,

erudiri haberent blasphemandum non esse."--"De Pudicitia," c. xiii.

[225:2] 1 Cor. i. 11,12.

[225:3] That the Church of Corinth at this time was organized in the

same way as other Christian communities is evident from various

allusions in the first epistle. See 1 Cor. iv. 15, vi. 5, xii. 27, 28.

Crispus, mentioned Acts xviii. 8, was, no doubt, one of the eldership.

There is a reference to the elders in 1 Cor. xiv. 30. See Vitringa, "De

Synagoga," p. 600.

[225:4] In the apostolic age, censures were pronounced in presence of

the whole church. See 1 Tim. v. 20. It is to be noted that Paul himself

does not excommunicate the offender. He merely delivers his apostolic

judgment that the thing should be done, and calls upon the Corinthians

to do it; but he expects them to proceed in due order, the rulers and

the people performing their respective parts.

[227:1] 2 Cor. ii. 7, 8. The mode of proceeding here indicated is

illustrated by what took place in the Church of Rome about the middle of

the third century. There certain penitents first appeared before the

presbytery to express their contrition, and then it was arranged that

"this whole proceeding should be communicated _to the people_, that they

might see those established in the Church, whom they had so long seen

and mourned wandering and straying."--Cyprian, Epist. xlvi. p. 136.

Edit. Baluzius, Venice, 1728.

[228:1] That "the church" here signifies the eldership, see Vitringa,

"De Synagoga," p. 724.

[228:2] Matt, xviii. 15, 17.

[228:3] In our English version the original word [Greek:(paradosin)] is

improperly rendered _tradition_.

[228:4] Thess. iii. 6.

[228:5] Matt. v. 45.

[229:1] 2 Thess. iii. 14, 15.

[229:2] For an account of the excommunication of the Druids, see Caesar,

"De Bello Gallico," vi. 13. Many things in the Latin excommunication are

doubtless borrowed from paganism.

[229:3] As an example of this, see an old form of excommunication in

Collier's "Ecclesiastical History," ii. 273. Edit. London, 1840.

[230:1] Eph. iv. 11, 12.

[230:2] 1 Cor. xii. 28.

[230:3] 2 Tim. iv. 5.

[230:4] Acts xxi. 8, viii. 5.

[230:5] 1 Tim. i 3, v. 1, 7, 17; Tit. i. 5.

[231:1] Acts viii. 13; 2 Tim. i. 6. This latter text is often quoted,

though erroneously, as if it referred to the ordination of Timothy. The

ordainer usually laid on only his right hand. See "Con. Carthag." iv.

can. iii. iv. In conferring extraordinary endowments both hands were

imposed. See Acts xix. 6.

[231:2] John xiv. 26, xvi. 13, xx. 22.

[231:3] Matt. x. 1, xxviii. 18, 19.

[231:4] John xx. 26, xxi. 1; Acts i. 3; 1 Cor. ix. 1.

[231:5] Such is the opinion of Chrysostom and others. See Alford on this

passage.

[231:6] Acts vi. 2-4.

[231:7] In the Peshito version helps and governments are translated

_helpers_ and _governors_.

[232:1] It is remarkable that the lay council of the modern synagogue

are called Parnasim or Pastors. See Vitringa, "De Synagoga," pp. 578,

635.

[232:2] Mr Alford observes that in 1 Cor. xii. 28, "we must not seek for

a _classified_ arrangement"--the arrangement being "rather suggestive

than logical." Hence "helps" are mentioned _before_ "governments." In

the same way in Eph. iv. 11, "pastors" precede "teachers."

[232:3] Acts xx. 28; 1 Pet. v. 2.

[232:4] Acts xx. 17, 28; Titus i. 5, 7; 1 Pet. v. 1, 2.

[232:5] 1 Tim. iii. 1, 2, 5.

[232:6] 1 Pet. v. 1, 2, 4 The identity of elders and pastors is more

distinctly exhibited in the original here, and in Acts xx. 17, 28, as

the word translated _feed_ signifies literally _to act as a shepherd_ or

pastor.

[232:7] 1 Tim. v. 17. Mr Ellicott, in his work on the "Pastoral

Epistles," thus speaks of this passage--"The concluding words, [Greek:

en logô kai didask.], certainly seem to imply _two_ kinds of ruling

presbyters, those who preached and taught and those who did not."

[233:1] Compare 1 Cor. xii. 28, and Philip, i. 1; 1 Tim. iii. 1-8.

[233:2] Acts vi. 3, xiv. 23; Titus i. 5; James v. 14.

[233:3] 1 Cor. xiv. 1, 5, 6, 31.

[233:4] Section Rom. xii. 6-8.

[233:5] 1 Tim, iii. 5. Lightfoot says that, "in every synagogue there

was a civil triumvirate, that is, three magistrates who judged of

matters in contest arising within that synagogue."--"Works," xi.179. The

same writer declares that "in every synagogue there were elders that

ruled in civil affairs, and elders that laboured in the word and

doctrine."--"Works," iii. 242, 243.

[234:1] [Greek: diplês timês]. Those who adduce this passage to prove

that the apostle here defines the pecuniary remuneration of elders

involve themselves in much difficulty; for, if limited to the matter of

payment, and literally interpreted, it would lead to the inference that,

irrespective of the amount of service rendered, all the elders should

receive the same compensation; and that no church teacher, though the

father of a large family, should be allowed more than twice the gratuity

of a poor widow! Compare I Tim. v. 3, and 17. The "double honour" of I

Tim. v. 17, is evidently equivalent to the "all honour" of 1 Tim. vi. 1.

In the latter case there can be no reference to payment. Paul obviously

means to say that the claims of elders should be fully recognized; and

in the following verse (1 Tim. v. 18) he refers pointedly to the

temporal support to which church teachers are entitled.

[234:2] 1 Tim. iii. 2-7.

[234:3] [Greek: didaktikon].

[234:4] Matt. iv. 23; Acts v. 42, xv. 35.

[235:1] Heb. iii. 13.

[235:2] Col. iii. 16.

[235:3] 1 Pet. iii. 15.

[235:4] 2 Tim. ii. 24, 25.

[235:5] Even a female, though not permitted to speak in the Church, had

often this aptness for teaching. Such was the case with the excellent

Priscilla, Acts xviii. 26. The aged women were required to be "teachers

of good things," Titus ii. 3.

[237:1] In the Church of Corinth several speakers were in the habit of

addressing the same meeting. 1 Cor. xiv. 26, 27, 29, 31.

[237:2] 1 Tim. v. 17.

[237:3] Gal. vi. 6.

[237:4] 1 Tim. v. 18.

[237:5] 1 Cor. ix. 14.

[237:6] Matt. x. 1; 1 Cor. xiv. 18.

[237:7] "The place which the apostles occupied while they lived is now

filled, not by a living order of ministers, but by their own inspired

writings, which constitute, or ought to constitute, the supreme

authority in the Church of God.... The New Testament Scriptures, as they

are the only real apostolate now in existence, so, are sufficient to

supply to us the place of the inspired Twelve."--_Litton's Church of

Christ_, p. 410.

[237:1] "While it is clearly recorded that the apostles instituted the

orders of presbyters and deacons, it is not so clearly recorded, _indeed

it is not recorded at all_, that they instituted the order of

bishops."--_Litton_, p. 426. Such a testimony from a Fellow of Oxford is

creditable alike to his candour and his intelligence.

[237:2] Acts xv. 6, xvi. 4, xxi. 18, 25.

[237:3] Acts xx. 17, 25.

[237:4] Acts xx. 29-31.

[237:5] Acts vi. 4. "Here," says Mr Litton, "no mention is made of

government or of ordination, as the special prerogative of the apostolic

office; _and if it were not dangerous to lay too much stress upon a

single passage_, it might from this one be plausibly inferred that _the

special function of the apostles, as representatives of the ordinary

Christian ministry, has descended_, not to bishops, but to presbyters,

to whom it specially pertains to give themselves to prayer and the

ministry of the Word."--_Litton's Church of Christ_, p. 407. It is

certainly not dangerous to lay as much stress upon any Scripture as it

will legitimately bear, and the inference hero drawn is in accordance

with the rules of the most exact logic.

[238:1] 1 Cor. i. 17.

[238:2] Eph. iii. 8. In dealing with individuals, the apostles seldom

challenged obedience on the ground of their divine authority. When they

are represented as directing the movements of ministers, the language

generally implies simply that the parties in question undertook certain

services at their instigation or request, or by their advice. Thus, Paul

says that he _besought_ Timothy to abide in Ephesus, that he _left_

Titus in Crete, and that he _sent_ Epaphroditus to the Philippians (1

Tim. i. 3; Titus i. 5; Philip. ii. 25). But Paul himself is said to have

been _sent forth_ to Tarsus _by the brethren_ (Acts ix. 30). When Mark

refused to accompany Paul and Silas into Asia Minor he did not therefore

forfeit his ecclesiastical status (Acts xiii. 13, xv. 37-39). Apart from

their special commission, the apostles were entitled to deference from

other ministers on account of their superior age and experience; and

Paul sometimes refers to this claim. See Philem. 8, 9. On the same

ground all who have recently entered the ministry are bound to yield

precedence to aged pastors, and to respect their advice. See 1 Pet. v. 5.

[238:3] It can scarcely be necessary to remind the reader that the

postscripts to these epistles setting forth that Timothy was "ordained

the first bishop of the church of the Ephesians," and that Titus was

"ordained the first bishop of the Church of the Cretians," are spurious.

See Period i. sec. ii. chap. i. p. 181.

[239:1] 1 Tim. i. 3. Paul says (1 Cor. iv. 17) to the _Corinthians_--"I

have sent unto you Timotheus .... who shall bring you into remembrance

of my ways which be in Christ;" and, according to the mode of reasoning

employed by some, we might infer from this text that Timothy was bishop

of Corinth. "It is a suspicious circumstance," says Dr Burton, "that

several persons who are mentioned in the New Testament, are said to have

been bishops of the places connected with their names. Thus Cornelius is

said to have been bishop of Caesarea, and to have succeeded Zacchaeus,

though it is highly improbable that either of them filled such an

office."--"Lectures," i., p. 182.

[239:2] 1 Tim. vi. 17.

[239:3] See Period i. sect. i. chap, ix. p. 131.

[239:4] Acts xx. 30, 31.

[240:1] The word [Greek: katastêsês], here translated "ordain," should

rather be rendered _constitute_, or _establish_.

[240:2] Titus i. 5.

[240:3] Titus iii. 13.

[240:4] Acts vi. 3, xiv. 23; 2 Cor. viii. 19, 23.

[240:5] Acts xxiii. 3.

[240:6] "The whole Sanhedrim were the judges, and sitting to judge him

according to the law."--_Alford on Acts_ xxiii. 3.

[241:1] See Prideaux's "Connections," part ii. books 1 and 8.

[241:2] Acts xxvi. 17, 18. See also, as another illustration, Matt. xvi.

19.

[241:3] 2 Cor. xi. 28.

[241:4] 1 Tim. iv. 12, 13; 2 Tim. ii. 22, 23; Titus ii. 7, 8.

[241:5] 1 Tim. ii. 1, 2, iv. 16, v. 19, 20, 22; 2 Tim. ii. 2, 15, iv. 2,

5; Titus iii, 8, 9.

[242:1] 1 Tim. v. 5, 16, vi. 1, 2, 9, 17; Titus ii. 6, 9, 10.

[242:2] One of the most remarkable instances of an appeal to the sense

of individual obligation in a case where many were concerned may be

found in Gal. vi. 1.

[242:3] Whitby, in his "Preface to the Epistle to Titus," says candidly

of the allegation that Timothy and Titus were bishops respectively of

Ephesus and Crete--"Now, of this matter, I confess I can find nothing in

any writer of the first three centuries, nor any intimation that they

bore that name."

[242:4] 1 Tim. i. 3; 2 Tim. iv. 10, 12, 21; Titus i. 5, iii. 12.

[242:5] Hence Fulgentius speaks of "cathedra Joannis Evangelistae

Ephesi." Lib. "De Trinitate," c. 1. Contradictory traditions sometimes

happily annihilate each other.

[243:1] Homer, "Iliad," ii. v. 156.

[243:2] Mark x. 42-45.

[244:1] 1 Pet. v. 3.

[244:2] Acts i. 15, 21-23, 26.

[244:3] 2 Cor. viii. 19, 23. See also 1 Cor xvi. 3.

[244:4] Acts vi. 3, xiv. 23. See also 1 Tim. iii. 10, compared with 1

John iv. 1.

[244:5] Clemens Romanus states that, in the apostolic age,

ecclesiastical appointments were made "with the approbation of the whole

church." "Epist. to Corinthians," § 44.

[245:1] Acts vi. 6; 1 Tim. v. 22.

[245:2] See Selden, "De Synedriis," lib. i. c. 14.

[245:3] Acts xiii. 1-3.

[245:4] Acts xiv. 23.

[245:5] 1 Tim. iv. 14. That the preposition [Greek: meta] here indicates

the instrumental cause, see Acts xiii. 17, xiv. 27.

[245:6] Acts vi. 6. Some have thought it strange that Paul gives no

instructions to Titus respecting the ordination of deacons in Crete. See

Titus i. 8. This was unnecessary, as the elders, when ordained, could

afterwards ordain deacons.

[245:7] Rom. xvi. 1.

[245:8] [Greek: diakonon].

[246:1] 1 Tim. v. 3, 4, 9.

[246:2] Rom. xvi 2.

[247:1] 1 Cor. xii. 12, 21, 26.

[249:1] Such as we find described in Deut. xxxi. 10-12.

[249:2] In Greek [Greek: ekklêsia]. The reference in the text is to its

ecclesiastical use, for in the New Testament it sometimes signifies a

mob. See Acts xix. 32.

[249:3] Acts xi. 22, xv. 4.

[249:4] Acts xxi. 20, [Greek: posai muriades]--literally, "how many tens

of thousands."

[249:5] One of these is mentioned Acts xii. 12.

[249:6] Acts xiii. 1.

[249:7] Acts ix. 31. The true reading here is, "Then had _the church_

([Greek: ekklêsia]) rest throughout all Judea and Galilee and Samaria."

This reading is supported by the most ancient manuscripts, including

ABC; by the Vulgate, and nearly all the ancient versions; including the

old Syriac, Coptic, Sahidic, Ethiopian, Arabic of Erpenius, and

Armenian; and by the most distinguished critics, such as Kuinoel,

Lachmann, Tischendorf, Alford, and Tregelles. It is likewise sustained

by the authority of what is believed to be by far the most valuable

cursive MS. in existence. See Scrivener's "Codex Augiensis," Introd.

lxviii., and p. 425. Cambridge, 1859.

[250:1] John xvii. 21.

[250:2] Eph. iv. 16.

[250:3] See Col. ii. 19.

[251:1] Acts viii. 14.

[251:2] Acts xi. 22. "No notion is more at variance with the spirit of

apostolic Christianity than that of societies of Christians existing in

the same neighbourhood, but not in communion with each other, and not

under a common government."--_Litton_, p. 450.

[251:3] 2 Cor. viii. 19.

[251:4] Period I. sec. iii. chap. i. p. 214.

[251:5] "That the Church did really derive its polity from the synagogue

is a fact upon the proof of which, in the present state of theological

learning, it is needless to expend many words."--_Litton's Church of

Christ_, p. 254.

[251:6] See Selden, "De Synedriis," lib. ii. c. 5; Lightfoot's "Works,"

iii. 242, and xi. 179. Josephus says that Moses appointed only seven

judges in every city. "Antiq." book iv. c. 8, § 14. See also "Wars of

the Jews," ii. c. 20, § 5.

[252:1] Luke xxii. 66; Acts v. 21, vi. 15. See also Prideaux, part ii.

book vii., and Lightfoot's "Works," ix. 342.

[252:2] Matt. xvi. 21, xxvi. 59; Mark xv. 1. See also Lightfoot's

"Works," iv. 223.

[252:3] 1 Chron. xxiv. 4, 7-18.

[252:4] Acts v. 34.

[252:5] As they represented the people, and were probably twenty-four in

number, there may be a reference to them in Rev. iv. 4.

[252:6] Matt. v. 22.

[253:1] Deut. xvii. 8-10; 2 Chron. xix. 8-11; Ps. cxxii. 5.

[253:2] Acts ix. 1, 2, 14.

[253:3] Acts ii. 14, 41, 42, iv. 4, 32, 33, 35, v. 14, 42, vi. 6, 7,

viii. 14.

[253:4] Acts xiii. 1, 3.

[253:5] Titus i. 5.

[253:6] 1 Tim. iv. 14.

[253:7] In the same way the Puritans, in the reign of Queen Elizabeth,

frequently held meetings in London during the sittings of Parliament.

See Collier, vii. 33, 64.

[254:1] For a more particular account of the constitution of the meeting

mentioned in the 15th chapter of the Acts, see Period I. sec. i. chap.

v. p. 82.

[255:1] Acts xv. 6.

[255:2] Acts xv. 19. "James, according to the somewhat pompous rendering

in our English version, says--'Wherefore _my sentence is_'--in the

original--[Greek: dio elô krina]--a common formula by which the members

of the Greek assemblies introduced the expression of their individual

opinion, as appears from its repeated occurrence in Thucydides, with

which may be compared the corresponding Latin phrase (_sic censeo_) of

frequent use in Cicero's orations."--_Alexander on the Acts_, ii. p. 83.

[256:1] Mark xvi. 15.

[257:1] See the spurious epistle of Clement to James, prefixed to the

Clementine Homilies. Cotelerius, "Pat. Apost." vol. i. p. 617.

[258:1] Acts xx. 17.

[258:2] Acts xx. 16.

[258:3] The view here taken is corroborated by the authority of

Irenaeus, iii. c. 14, § 2:--"In Mileto enim convocatis episcopis et

presbyteris, qui erant ab Epheso, _et a reliquis proximis civitatibus_,"

&c.

[259:1] Acts xx. 18.

[259:2] Acts xix. 8, 10.

[259:3] Acts xx. 31.

[259:4] Acts xx. 25. Demetrius says to the craftsmen--"Ye see and hear

that _not alone at Ephesus, but almost throughout all Asia_, this Paul

hath persuaded and turned away much people." Acts xix. 26.

[259:5] See Period I. sec. i. chap. viii. p. 123.

[259:6] 1 Cor. xvi. 19.

[259:7] Gal. i. 2.

[259:8] Gal. v. 13.

[259:9] Gal. vi. 2.

[259:10] 1 Pet. i. 1.

[260:1] 1 Pet. v. i, 2.

[260:2] In Acts xx. 28, these designations are identical. The

exhortation in 1 Pet. v. 5--"Yea, all of you be _subject one to

another_"--is obviously addressed to _ministers_, and implies their

mutual subordination. This command can be acted upon only by ministers

who are confederated and who hold the same ecclesiastical status.

Lachmann adopts a somewhat different reading of this verse without

changing the sense, for he puts a semi-period after [Greek: allêlois].

According to his Larger Edition of the Greek Testament, the commencement

of the verse should be rendered thus--"Likewise ye younger (presbyters)

submit yourselves unto the elder, AND ALL TO ONE ANOTHER." I here

suppose _presbyters_ to be understood, as the apostle is speaking to

them in all the preceding part of the chapter.

[260:3] 2 Cor. viii. 5, 18, 22; Phil. ii. 25, 28; Col. iv. 7-9; 2 Tim.

iv. 9-12.

[260:4] 2 Cor. iii. 1.

[261:1] 2 John 10.

[261:2] 1 John iv. 1.

[261:3] Phil. i. 15-18.

[263:1] Rev. i. 1.

[264:1] Rev. i. 11.

[264:2] Rev. i. 12-16.

[264:3] Rev. i. 20.

[264:4] This was the opinion of Gregory Nazianzen, as well as others.

There is an ingenious article on this subject in the "Bibliotheca Sacra"

for April 1855. Its author, the Rev. Isaac Jennings, advocates the view

propounded in this chapter.

[265:1] This is the opinion of Prideaux, Vitringa, and many others. See

Prid. "Connec." part. i. book vi.; and Vitringa, "De Synagoga," lib.

iii. par. 2, cap. 3.

[265:2] Acts xiii. 15.

[265:3] Luke iv. 16.

[265:4] Luke iv. 20.

[266:1] Prideaux, part i. book vi. vol. i. p. 385. Edit. London, 1716.

[266:2] "The hours of public devotions in them on their synagogue days

were, as to morning and evening prayers, the same hours in which the

morning and evening sacrifices were offered up at the temple."--Prideaux,

part i. book vi.

[266:3] Maurice, in his work on Diocesan Episcopacy in reply to

Clarkson, admits (p. 257) that in our Saviour's time, Laodicea had "but

few inhabitants." Philadelphia is described by Strabo as a place with a

small population.

[266:4] Acts xix. 20.

[266:5] Acts xix. 26.

[267:1] Prideaux speaks of the angel of the synagogue, in relation to

the rulers, as "_next to them_, or perchance one of them."--Part i. book

vi. vol. i. p. 385.

[267:2] It appears never to have occurred to Tertullian that the angels

of the Churches were bishops. He obviously considered the angel of the

Church an invisible intelligence. Thus he says of Paul--"Lusit igitur et

de suo spiritu, et de ecclesiae angelo, et de virtute Domini, si quod de

consilio eorum pronunciaverat rescidit."--_De Pudicitia_, c. xiv. ad

finem. See also Tertullian "De Baptismo," c. vi. Such, too, was the

opinion of Origen.--"De Principiis," lib. i. c. 8, and "De Oratione,"

11. The fact that, _long after the hierarchy was formed_, in two or

three rare cases a bishop is called an angel, in reference to the angels

of the Apocalypse, is nothing to the purpose. See Bingham, i. 79.

[268:1] Phil. iv. 14, 18.

[269:1] Phil. ii. 25.

[269:2] 2 Cor. viii. 23, [Greek: apostoloi ekklêsiôn]. In after-times it

was deemed proper that those messengers should be of the clerical

order.--See Cyprian, epist. xxiv., lxxv., and lxxix.

[269:3] Luke vii. 27, [Greek: ton angelon mou].

[269:4] James ii, 25, [Greek: tous angelous].

[269:5] John xxi. 7, 20.

[270:1] Thus Hippolytus speaks of a certain elder, named Hyacinthus, who

was sent to the governor of Sardinia with a letter for the release of

the Christians banished there. "Philosophumena," p. 288. The _legate_ of

the bishop of Rome is a species of memorial of the angel of the ancient

Church.

[270:2] Rev. ii. 7, 11, 17, 29, iii. 6, 13, 22.

[270:3] Rev. i. 11.

[271:1] Rev. i. 1.

[271:2] Isa. xlix. 15, 16.

[271:3] The Christians of Hierapolis are mentioned Col. iv. 13.

[271:4] Acts xx. 4.

[272:1] Lev. xxvi. 11, 12.

[272:2] Rev. i. 16.

[272:3] Ps. lxvii. 1, 2.

[275:1] A.D. 96 to A.D. 98.

[275:2] A.D. 98 to A.D. 117.

[276:1] Origen, "Contra Celsum," i. § 67. See also i. § 26.

[276:2] Origen, "Contra Celsum," iii. § 29.

[277:1] Justin Martyr, "Apol." ii. 61. Edit, Paris, 1615.

[277:2] The Peshito, or old Syriac version, is supposed to have been

made in the first half of the second century.--Westcott "On the Canon,"

pp. 264, 265. There are traces of the existence of a Latin version in

the time of Tertullian, or before the close of the second

century.--Ibid., p. 275. "Two versions into the dialects of Upper and

Lower Egypt--the Thebaic (Sahidic) and Memphitic--date from the close of

the third century."--Ibid. pp. 415, 416.

[278:1] See Middleton's "Inquiry," pp. 3, 9.

[278:2] See Kaye's "Tertullian," pp. 98-101. Edition, Cambridge, 1826.

[278:3] Tertullian states that the Emperor Marcus Aurelius became

friendly to the Christians, in consequence of a remarkable interposition

of Providence in favour of his army, in a war with the Marcomanni and

the Quadi. It was alleged that, in answer to the prayers of a body of

Christian soldiers, afterwards known as the _Thundering Legion_, the

imperial troops were relieved by rain, whilst a thunderstorm confounded

the enemy. It is quite certain that the Roman army was rescued from

imminent peril by a seasonable shower; but it is equally clear that the

emperor attributed his deliverance, not to the God of the Christians,

but to Jupiter Pluvius, and that a certain section of the Roman soldiers

was known long before by the name of the Thundering Legion. There is no

evidence that Marcus Aurelius ever became friendly to the Christians.

See Lardner. "Heathen Testimonies," "Works," vii. 176-188.

[279:1] See Middleton's "Inquiry," p. 84. Edition, Dublin, 1749. Bishop

Kaye has remarked that, in the writings of Tertullian, "the only power

of the exercise of which specific instances are alleged, was that of

exorcising evil spirits." "Kaye's Tertullian," p. 461. From the symptoms

mentioned it would appear that the individuals with whom the exorcists

succeeded were epileptics.

[279:2] Irenaeus, who seems to have been not unfavourable to the

Montanists, speaks of the gift of tongues as possessed by some in his

age, and yet he himself, as a missionary, was obliged to struggle with

the difficulties of a foreign language. "Adv. Haeres," v., c. 6, and

"Praef." ad. 1.

[279:3] When Theophilus of Antioch, towards the end of the second

century, was invited by Autolycus to point out a single person who had

been raised from the dead, he did not accept the challenge. See Kaye's

"Justin Martyr," p. 217.

[279:4] Middleton's "Inquiry," Preface, p. iv.

[279:5] Middleton, pp. 22, 23.

[280:1] Plinii, "Epist." lib. x. epist. 97.

[280:2] Tertullian, "Ad Scapulam," c. 5.

[280:3] "Spicilegium Syriacum" by Cureton, p. 31. The correspondence

between Abgar and our Lord, given by Eusebius, is manifestly spurious.

[281:1] Gregory of Tours, "Hist. Francorum," lib. i. c. 28.

[281:2] Sozomen, "Hist. Eccles." ii. 6, and Philostorgius, "Hist.

Eccles." ii. 5.

[281:3] "Adversus Judaeos," c. 7.

[282:1] Justin Martyr, "Dialogue with Trypho," Opera, p. 345.

[282:2] Theophilus, "Ad Autolycum," lib. ii. See also Origen, "In

Matthaeum," Opera, tom. iii. p. 858.

[282:3] "Life of Alexander Severus," by Lampridius.

[282:4] Euseb. viii. 1.

[284:1] Cyprian, "De Laude Martyrii," Opera, pp. 620, 621. See also

Tertullian, "Ad Scapulam," c. 5. _ad finem_.

[285:1] Tertullian, "Apol." 50.

[287:1] Tertullian, "De Idololatria," c. 17.

[287:2] Matt. x. 35, 36.

[287:3] Tertullian, "Apol." c. 3, and "Ad Nationes," i. § 4.

[287:4] 1 Cor. xv. 19.

[288:1] The Christians long gloried in the fact that Nero was their

first persecutor. See Tertullian, "Apol." c. 5.

[289:1] Plinii, "Epist." lib. x. epist. 97.

[290:1] Matt. xiii. 55; Mark vi. 3. That Simon and Simeon are the same,

see Acts xv. 7, 14.

[290:2] Trajan died A.D. 117, and if Simeon was born a year after Jesus,

he entered upon the 120th year of his age about the close of this

Emperor's reign. See Greswell's "Dissertations," vol. ii. pp. 127, 128.

It was the opinion of Tertullian that Mary had other sons after she gave

birth to our Lord. See Neander's "Antignostikus," and Tertullian "De

Monogamia," c. 8.

[293:1] The account of the trial of himself and his companions, as given

in the "Acta Sincera Martyrum" by Ruinart, bears all the marks of truth.

[293:2] An account of his martyrdom is given in a circular letter of the

Church of Smyrna. See Jacobson's "Patres Apostolici," tom. ii. p. 542.

Euseb. iv. 15.

[294:1] These places are distant from each other about seventeen miles.

[296:1] Euseb. v. 1.

[296:2] Among the Romans a concubine held a certain legal position, and

was in fact a wife with inferior privileges. Converted concubines were

admitted to the communion of the ancient Church. See Bunsen's

"Hippolytus," iii. 7.

[296:3] Mosheim ("Commentaries" by Vidal. ii. 52, note) and many others,

refer the transaction recorded in the text to the reign of Hadrian, but

without any good cause. Tertullian, who tells the story ("Ad Scapulani,"

c. 5), evidently alludes to a transaction which had recently occurred.

In the reign of Commodus there was a proconsul named Arrius Antoninus

who was put to death. See Lamprid, "Vita Commodi," c. 6, 7. See also

Kaye's "Tertullian," p. 146, note; and "Neander's General History" by

Torrey, i. 162, note.

[296:4] Clemens Alexandrinus apparently refers to the times immediately

following the death of Commodus when he says--"Many martyrs are daily

burned, crucified, and decapitated before our eyes." Strom, lib. ii. p.

414.

[297:1] Tertullian, "Ad Scapulam," c. 4.

[297:2] Compare Justin Martyr, "Apol." ii. pp. 70, 71, and "Dial, cum

Tryphone," p. 227, with Tertullian, "Apol." c. 7.

[297:3] Called _libellos_.

[297:4] These parties sometimes appealed to Acts xvii. 9, in

justification of their conduct.

[298:1] The _sacrificati_, or those who had sacrificed, as well as

offered incense, were considered still more guilty.

[298:2] "Acta Perpetuae et Felicitatis." The martyrs appear to have been

Montanists. See Gieseler, by Cunningham, i. 125, note. Tertullian

mentions Perpetua, and his language countenances the supposition that

she was a Montanist. "De Anima," c. 55.

[300:1] See the "Chronicon" of Eusebius, par. ii., adnot. p. 197. Edit.

Venet, 1818.

[301:1] The Roman clergy speak of "the remnants and ruined heaps of the

fallen lying on all sides." Cyp. "Epist." xxxi. p. 99. Cyprian complains

of _"thousands_ of letters given _daily_" in behalf of the lapsed by

misguided confessors and martyrs. "Epist." xiv. p. 59. The writer here

probably speaks somewhat rhetorically, and evidently does not mean, as

some have thought, that all these letters were written at Carthage. He

speaks of what was done "everywhere," including Italy, as well as the

cities of Africa. "Epist." xiv., xxii., xxvi.

[301:2] Dionysius of Alexandria, quoted by Euseb., vi. 41.

[302:1] Euseb. vi. 39.

[302:2] A.D. 249 to A.D. 251.

[302:3] Cyprian, Epist. 82, ad Successum.

[302:4] Cyprian, who seems to have been much respected personally by the

high officers of government at Carthage, was, when taken prisoner,

granted as great indulgence as his circumstances would permit; but

Gibbon, who describes his case with special minuteness, most uncandidly

represents it as affording an average specimen of the style in which

condemned Christians were treated. As an evidence of the social position

of the bishop of Carthage we may refer to the testimony of Pontius his

deacon, who states that "numbers of eminent and illustrious persons, men

of rank and family and secular distinction, for the sake of their old

friendship with him, urged him many times to retire." "Life," § 14.

[303:1] Euseb. vii. 13.

[303:2] See Bingham, ii. p. 451.

[304:1] "De Mortibus Persec." c. 10.

[304:2] Euseb. viii. 2; "De Mort. Persec." c. 13. See also "Neander," by

Torrey, i. 202, note.

[305:1] Eusebius, "Martyrs of Palestine," c. 4.

[305:2] Eusebius, "Martyrs of Palestine," c. 9.

[305:3] The Vatican Manuscript, the oldest in existence, was probably

written shortly after this persecution. It possesses internal evidences

that its date is anterior to the middle of the fourth century. See

Horne, iv. 161, 10th edition.

[306:1] Eusebius, viii. 6, 9, 10, 12.

[307:1] Firmilian refers to a noted persecution which "did not extend to

the whole world, _but was local_." Cyprian, "Epist." lxxv. p. 305.

[308:1] The treatise "De Mortibus Persecutorum" is generally attributed

to Lactantius who flourished in the early part of the fourth century.

The authorship is doubtful.

[308:2] Ps. ix. 16.

[308:3] Herodian, iii. 23. This circumstance, as well as some others

here stated, is not mentioned in the work "De Mort. Persec." Tertullian

mentions some other remarkable facts, "Ad Scapulam," c. 3.

[308:4] "De Mortib. Persec.," c. 49.

[309:1] Tertullian, "Apol." c. 46.

[310:1] Tertullian, "Apol." 28.

[310:2] Tertullian, "Ad Scapulam," § 2.

[311:1] John xviii. 36.

[312:1] Phil. iii. 18, 19.

[313:1] Cyprian, "De Lapsis," p. 374.

[313:2] Cyprian, "Ad Cornelium," epist. xlix. p. 143. Cyprian also

charges one of his deacons with fraud, extortion, and adultery. Epist.

xxxviii. p. 116.

[313:3] Cornelius of Rome in Euseb. vi. 43.

[315:1] See Eusebius, v. 3, vi. 9.

[315:2] See Neander's "Antignostikus," part ii. sect. ii. at the end. It

appears that the Christian ascetics adopted the dress of the pagan

philosophers.

[315:3] Cyprian, "De Habitu Virginum," pp. 354, 361.

[315:4] Still, in the time of Origen, the sons of bishops, presbyters,

and deacons valued themselves upon their parentage.--Origen in

"Matthaeum" xv. opera, tom. in. p. 690. Even Cyprian bears honourable

testimony to certain married presbyters. See "Epist." xxxv. p. 111. See

also "Epist." xviii. p. 67. Cyprian himself was indebted for his

conversion to an eminent presbyter, named Caecilius, who had a wife and

children. "Life of Cyprian," by Pontius the Deacon, § 5.

[315:1] Cyprian, "Epist." lxii. p. 219. Concerning the _Subintroductae_,

see also the letter relating to Paul of Samosata in Euseb. vii. 30.

[316:1] Jerome and Athanasius.

[316:2] See Medhurst's "China," p. 217. The symbol of the cross was

engraved on the walls of the temple of Serapis. "When the temple of

Serapis was torn down and laid bare," says Socrates, "there were found

in it, engraven on stones, certain characters, which they call

hieroglyphics, having the forms of crosses. _Both the Christians and

Pagans on seeing them, thought they had reference to their respective

religions_." "Ecc. Hist." v. 17.

[316:3] Prescott, "Conquest of Mexico," in. 338-340. See also note, p.

340. Sir Robert Ker Porter mentions a block of stone found among the

ruins of Susa, having, on one side, inscriptions in the cuneiform

diameter; and, on another, hieroglyphical figures with a cross in the

corner. See his "Travels," vol. ii. p. 415. Among the ancient pagans,

the cross was the symbol of eternal life, or divinity. On medals and

monuments of a date far anterior to Christianity, it is found in the

hands of statues of victory and of figures of monarchs. See also

Tertullian, "Apol." c. 16.

[317:1] Tertullian, "De Praescrip. Haeret." c. 40. See also Kaye's

Tertullian, p. 441. "The ancient world was possessed by a dread of

demons, and under an anxious apprehension of the influence of charms,

sought for external preservatives against the powers of evil, and

accompanied their prayers with external signs and gestures." Bunsen's

"Hippolytus," iii. 351.

[317:2] See Justin Martyr, "Dialogue with Trypho," pp. 259, 318, and

"Apol." ii. p. 90. Tertullian, "Adv. Judaeos," c. 10. In the "Octavius"

of Minucius Felix, the following remarkable passage occurs:--"What are

your military ensigns, and banners, and standards, but crosses gilded

and ornamented? _Your trophies of victory not only imitate the

appearance of a cross, but also of a man fixed to it_. We discern the

sign of a cross in the very form of a ship, whether it is wafted along

with swelling sails, or glides with its oars extended. When a military

yoke is erected there is a sign of a cross, and, in like manner, when

one with hands stretched forth devoutly addresses his God. _Thus, there

seems to be some reason in nature for it, and some reference to it in

your own system of religion_." The monogram [symbol: Chi-Rho], composed

of the initial Greek capitals [Greek: Chi] and [Greek: Rho] of the name

[Greek: christos], was in use among the heathen long before our era. It

is to be found on coins of the Ptolemies. Aringhus, "Roma Subterranea,"

ii. p. 567.

[318:1] Tertullian maintains ("Ad Jud." c. xi.) that the _mark_

mentioned Ezekiel ix. 4 was the letter T, or the sign of the cross. See

a Dissertation on this subject by Vitringa, "Observationes Sacrae," lib.

ii. c. 15. See also Origen. "In Ezechielem," Opera, tom. iii. p. 424,

and Cyprian to Demetrianus, § 12. It would appear that the worshippers

of Apollo used to mark themselves on the forehead with the letters

[Greek: CHI ETA]. See Kitto's "Cyclopaedia of Bib. Lit." art. FOREHEAD.

[318:2] Tertullian, "De Corona." c. 3. By the Romans, crosses were

erected in conspicuous places to intimidate offenders, just in the same

way as the drop is now exhibited in the front of a jail. It is not

improbable that some of these crosses were afterwards worshipped by the

Christians! Aringhi mentions a stone, to be seen in his own time in the

Vatican, which was treated with the same absurd reverence. On this stone

many of the early Christians were said to have suffered martyrdom,

probably by decapitation; but it was afterwards held "in very great

honour" at Rome, and regarded as "a sacred thing!" "Roma Subterranea,'"

i. 219.

[319:1] Minucius Felix, "Octavius," c. 24. There is a similar passage in

Tertullian, "Apol." c. 12.

[319:2] Clemens Alexandrinus, "Paedagog." iii. Opera, pp. 246, 247.

[319:3] Clemens Alexandrinus, "Stromat." v. Opera, p. 559.

[320:1] Canon 30. The comment of the Roman Catholic Dupin upon this

canon is worthy of note. "To me," says he, "it seems better to

understand it in the plainest sense, and to confess that the Fathers of

this Council did not approve the use of images, no more than that of wax

candles lighted in full daylight."--_History of Ecclesiastical Writers,

Fourth Century_.

[320:2] Tertullian, "De Pudicitia," c. 7. But all were not so

scrupulous, for Tertullian elsewhere complains that the image-makers

were chosen to church offices. "De Idololatria," c. 7.

[320:3] Tertullian, "De Idololatria," c. 6.

[321:1] Cyprian, "Ad Donatum," Opera, p. 5.

[321:2] Tertullian, "De Spectaculis," c. 4. According to the English

Liturgy the person baptized "renounces the devil and all his works, the

vain pomp and glory of the world." This was originally intended to apply

to such exhibitions as those mentioned in the text.

[322:1] Tertullian, "De Pudicitia," c. 7. Theophilus to Autolycus, book

iii.

[322:2] Tertullian "Apol." c. 44. Minucius Felix, in his "Octavius,"

makes a similar statement:--"The prisons are crowded with criminals of

your religion, but no Christian is there, unless he is either accused on

account of his faith, or is a deserter from his faith."

[322:3] Justin Martyr, in his Dialogue with Trypho the Jew, says to

him--"Your blind and foolish teachers even to this day permit every one

of you to have _four or five wives_."--_Opera_, p. 363.

[323:1] 1 Tim. iii. 2, 12.

[323:2] Rom. vii. 1-3; 1 Cor. vii. 2.

[323:3] The Montanists, in their extravagance, insisted that any one who

contracted a second marriage after the death of his first wife should be

excommunicated.

[323:4] 2 Cor. vi. 14.

[324:1] Tertullian, "Ad Uxorem," ii. 4.

[324:2] Gibbon, "Decline and Fall," chap. ii. Some writers, such as

Zumpt and Merivale, consider this estimate quite extravagant. Others

again think it quite too low. See Schaff's "History of the Christian

Church," p. 316. New York, 1859.

[324:3] Gal. iii. 28.

[325:1] Onesimus, the slave mentioned Philem. 10, 16, probably became a

Christian minister.

[325:2] 1 Cor. vii. 21.

[325:3] 1 Cor. vii. 20-22.

[325:4] 1 Tim. vi. 1, 2.

[325:5] Kindness to slaves was particularly enjoined by the early Church

teachers. See Cyprian, "Lib. Tres. Test. adv. Judaeos," lib. iii. § 72,

73.

[325:6] It is stated in the "Octavius" of Minucius Felix that, in the

estimation of the heathen, "for a slave to be partaker in certain

religious ceremonies is deemed abominable impiety." (c. 25.)

[326:1] One of the laws made by Constantine shortly after his conversion

sanctioned the manumission of slaves on the Lord's day.

[326:2] Thus, on one occasion, Cyprian raised a contribution of about

£900 in Carthage to purchase the release of some Christians of Numidia.

Cyprian, Epist. lx. p. 216. Tertullian said to the heathen, "Our charity

dispenses more in every street, than your religion in each

temple."--_Apol._ c. 42.

[327:1] About A.D. 252.

[327:2] Cyprian, "Ad Demetrianum," and "De Mortalitate." "Vita Cypriani

per Pontium," c. 9.

[327:3] Euseb. vii. 22.

[328:1] Athanasius, "Hist. Arian. ad Monachos," § 64.

[329:1] Luke xxii. 24-26.

[329:2] Rom. i. 8, 13.

[330:1] Gal. ii. 7-9.

[330:2] Rom. xvi. 3-15.

[330:3] Acts ii. 10.

[330:4] Euseb. ii. 22.

[330:5] Period 1. sec. i. chap. x.

[331:1] Hegesippus seems to have been the first who attempted to draw up

a list of the bishops, or presiding presbyters of Rome. See Pearson's

Criticism on Euseb. iv. 22, in his "Minor Works," vol. ii. p. 319,

Oxford, 1844; and Routh's "Reliquiae," i. pp. 270, 271.

[331:2] Thus, Irenaeus (i. 27) speaks of Hyginus as the _ninth_, and

again (iii. 3), as the _eighth_ in succession from the apostles.

[331:3] Thus, Irenaeus affirms (iii. 3) that Linus was the immediate

successor of the apostles, whilst Tertullian, who was his contemporary,

and who possessed equally good means of information, assigns that

position to Clement. "De Praescrip. Haeret." c. 32.

[331:4] Euseb. iii. 4.

[332:1] Irenaeus, "Contra Om. Haer." iii. 3, § 3. Bunsen has justly

remarked that, "with Telesphorus the most obscure period of the Roman

Church terminates."--_Hippolytus_, iv. pp. 209, 210.

[332:2] Irenaeus, iii. 4, § 3.

[332:3] This name continued to be given to the Roman bishop until at

least the close of the second century. See Irenaeus quoted in Euseb. v.

24.

[332:4] [Greek: katholikos]. See this subject more fully illustrated in

Period II. sec. iii. chap. viii.

[333:1] "Qui absistunt a principali successione, et quocunque loco

colligunt, suspectos habere (oportet) vel quasi haereticos et malae

sententiae; vel quasi scindentes et elatos et sibi placentes; aut rursus

ut hypocritas, quaestus gratia et vanae gloriae hoc operantes."

Irenaeus, iv. 26, § 2.

[333:2] See Period II. sec. iii. chap. vii.

[333:3] Blondel's "Apologia pro sententia Hieronymi," p. 18. Under

ordinary circumstances the new president, or bishop, was often elected

before his predecessor was buried. See Bingham, book ii. c. xi. § 2.

[333:4] See Pearson's "Minor Works," ii. 520.

[333:5] This method of appointment continued to be observed long

afterwards in some parts of the Church. See Bingham, book iv. chap. i.

sec. i. At Alexandria in the beginning of the fourth century the

presbyters selected three of their senior members, of whom the people

chose one. Cotelerius, ii., app. p. 180.

[334:1] [Greek: Ton tês episkopês klêron]. "Irenaeus," ed. Stieren, i.

p. 433.

[334:2] The Paschal feast. Irenaeus admits that this point formed only a

subordinate topic of discussion. See Stieren's "Irenaeus," i. p. 826,

note 6.

[334:3] See Period II. sec. iii. chap. vii.

[334:4] Euseb. iv. 14.

[335:1] Cyprian speaks of sending messengers to Rome "to ascertain and

report as to any rescript published respecting" the Christians. "Epist.

ad Successum." The Roman clergy could at once supply the information.

[336:1] Extract of a letter from Dionysius of Corinth, preserved in

Eusebius, iv. 23.

[336:2] The testimonies to this fact may be found discussed in Minter's

"Primordia Eccelesiae Africanae," p. 10. Herodian, who flourished in the

third century, speaks of Carthage as the next city after Rome in size

and wealth. Lib. vii. 6.

[336:3] In this way we may readily account for various statements in

Tertullian and Cyprian.

[337:1] We here see how a father who wrote so soon after the apostolic

age, blunders egregiously respecting the history of the Apostolic

Church.

[337:2] So I understand "his qui sunt undique." See Wordsworth's

"Hippolytus," p. 200. We have thus a remarkable proof that the word

_catholic_ was not in use when Irenaeus wrote, for he here expresses the

idea by a circumlocution.

[337:3] "Propter potentiorem principalitatem."

[337:4] Irenaeus iii. 3. See on this passage Gieseler, by Cunningham, i.

97, note. See also Period II. sec. iii. chap. viii.

[337:5] The circular letter relating to the martyrdom of Polycarp quoted

in Euseb. iv. 15. It was probably written a considerable time after the

death of the martyr, as it speaks of the way in which his _memory_ was

cherished when it was drawn up. § 19. As it uses the word _catholic_ it

must have been written after the appearance of the work of Irenaeus.

[337:6] Irenaeus quoted in Euseb. v. 24. See Period II. sec. iii. chap.

viii.

[339:1] We have an extract from them in Euseb. v. 4.

[339:2] Period II. sec. i. chap. ii. p. 296.

[339:3] Hippolytus, "Refut. Om. Haeres." book ix.

[340:1] This probably occurred early in the reign of Septimius Severus,

who at first is said to have been very favourable to the Church. Shortly

before, many in Rome of great wealth and eminent station had become

Christians.--Euseb. v. c. 21.

[340:2] See a more minute account of this controversy in Period II. sec.

iii. chap. xii.

[340:3] This is evident from the fact that Hippolytus is scarcely

willing to recognise some of the Roman bishops, his contemporaries. But

meanwhile both parties probably belonged to the same synod. Hippolytus

seems to have been the leader of a formidable opposition.

[341:1] Matt. xvi. 18.

[341:2] See the Muratorian fragment in Bunsen's "Analecta Ante-Nicaena,"

i. 154, 155. This, according to Bunsen, is a fragment of a work of

Hegesippus, and written about A.D. 165. Hippolytus, i. 314.

[341:3] "Hermae Pastor," lib. iii. simil. ix. § 12-14. "Petra haec....

Filius Dei est.... Quid est deinde haec turris? Haec, inquit, ecclesia

est.... Demonstra mihi quare non in terra aedificatur haec turris, sed

supra petram."

[341:4] Tertullian, "De Praescrip." xxii. "Latuit aliquid Petrum

aedificandae ecclesiae petram dictum?" Tertullian here speaks of the

doctrine as already current. Even after he became a Montanist, he still

adhered to the same interpretation--"Petrum solum invenio maritum, per

socrum; monogamum praesumo per _ecclesiam, quae super illum, aedificata_

omnem gradum ordinis sui de monogamis erat collocatura."--_De

Monogamia_, c. viii. Again, in another Montanist tract, he says--"Qualis

es, evertens atque commutans manifestam domini intentionem personaliter

hoc Petro conferentem? _Super te_, inquit, _aedificabo ecclesiam

meam_."--_De Pudicitia_, c. xxi. See also "De Praescrip." c. xxii.

According to Origen every believer, as well as Peter, is the foundation

of the Church. "Contra Celsum," vi. 77. See also "Comment in Matthaeum

xii.," Opera, tom. iii. p. 524, 526.

[342:1] See this subject more fully explained in Period II. sec. iii.

ch. viii.

[343:1] Even the letters of Victor, which created such a sensation

throughout the Church, are not forthcoming. See Pearson's "Vindiciae

Ignatianae," pars 2, cap. 13, as to the spuriousness of those imputed to

him.

[343:2] They extend from Clement, who, according to some lists, was the

first Pope, to Syricius, who was made Bishop of Rome A.D. 384. All

candid writers, whether Romanists or Protestants, now acknowledge them

to be forgeries. They may be found in "Binii Concilia." They made their

appearance, for the first time, about the eighth century.

[344:1] This is the date assigned to its erection by Bunsen, but Dr

Wordsworth argues that it was erected earlier.

[344:2] 22d August.

[345:1] The first edition appeared at Oxford in 1851, exactly three

hundred years after the discovery of the statue.

[345:2] This point has been fully established by Bunsen and Wordsworth.

[345:3] This is expressly stated by Tertullian, "Adversus Praxeam," c.

i.

[345:4] See Bower's "History of the Popes." Victor, 13th Bishop.

[345:5] According to the commonly received chronology, Victor occupied

the papal chair from A.D. 192 to A.D. 201; Zephyrinus from A.D. 201 to

A.D. 219; and Callistus from A.D. 219 to A.D. 223.

[346:1] [Greek: andros idiôtu kai aischrokerdous].

[346:2] [Greek: apeiron tôn ekklêsiakôn horôn].

[346:3] "Philosophumena," book ix.

[348:1] "Philosophumena," book ix.

[348:2] 14th October.

[348:3] "Philosophumena," book i., prooemium.

[348:4] [Greek: dedoikôs eme].

[348:5] Bunsen describes Hippolytus as "a member of the Roman

presbytery" ("Hippolytus," i. 313), but he is here evidently mistaken.

Hippolytus was at the head of a presbytery of his own, the presbytery of

Portus. The presbytery of Rome was confined to the elders or presbyters

of that city. The _presbyter_ Hippolytus mentioned by some ancient

writers seems to have been a quite different person from the bishop of

Portus.

[348:6] "Philosophumena," book ix.

[349:1] It is probable that the bishop was at first chosen by lot out of

a leet of three selected by the presbytery from among its members. (See

preceding chapter, p. 333, note.) An appointment was now made out of

this leet of three, not by lot, but by popular suffrage.

[349:2] Euseb. vi. 29.

[350:1] Evidently from [Greek: kata], _down_, and [Greek: kumbos], _a

cavity_. Mr Northcote, in his work on the "Roman Catacombs," published

in 1857, calculates that the streets in all, taken together, are 900

miles long!

[350:2] See "Three Introductory Lectures on Ecclesiastical History," by

William Lee, D.D., of Trinity College, Dublin, p. 27.

[350:3] It is probable that many were condemned to labour in these mines

as a punishment for having embraced Christianity. See Lee's "Three

Lectures," p. 28.

[350:4] Maitland's "Church in the Catacombs," p. 24. Dr Maitland visited

Rome in 1841, but his inspection of the Lapidarian Gallery seems to have

been regarded with extreme jealousy by the authorities there. After

having obtained a licence "to make some memoranda in drawing in that

part of the Museum," he was officially informed that "his permission

_did not extend to the inscriptions_", and the communication was

accompanied by a demand that "the copies already made should be given

up." To his refusal to yield to this mandate we are indebted for many

important memorials to be found in his interesting volume.

[351:1] See Maitland, pp. 27-29.

[352:1] Maitland, p. 14.

[352:2] Maitland, pp. 33, 41, 43, 170.

[352:3] "Philosophumena," book ix.

[352:4] As Carthage now furnished Rome with marble and granite, it is

probable that the quarrymen and sand-diggers of the catacombs came

frequently into contact with the Carthaginian sailors; and we may thus

see how, in the time of Cyprian, there were such facilities for

epistolary intercourse between the Churches of Rome and Carthage. Under

favourable circumstances, the mariner could accomplish the voyage

between the two ports in two or three days.

[353:1] "Philosophumena," book ix. Tertullian corroborates the charges

of Hippolytus. See "De Pudicitia," cap. i.

[353:2] We know, however, that, long after this period, married bishops

were to be found almost everywhere. One of the most eminent martyrs in

the Diocletian persecution was a bishop who had a wife and children. See

Eusebius, viii. c.9. Clemens Romanus, reputed one of the early bishops

of the Western capital, speaks as a married man. See his "Epistle to the

Corinthians," § 21.

[353:3] Maitland, pp. 191-193. These inscriptions may be found also in

Aringhi, i. 421, 419.

[353:4] Aringhi, ii. pp. 228; Rome, 1651.

[354:1] Cyprian to Antonianus, Epist. lii, p. 151.

[355:1] Cyprian speaks of "the blessed martyrs, Cornelius and Lucius."

Epist. lxvii. p. 250.

[355:2] See Cyprian's "Epistle to Successus," where it is stated that

"Xystus was martyred in the cemetery [the catacombs] on the eighth of

the Ides of August, and with him four deacons."

[355:3] This fragment may be found in Euseb. vi. 43.

[355:4] For an account of their duties see Period II. sec. iii. chap. x.

[355:5] According to some manuscripts, there were, not forty-six, but

forty-two presbyters, seven deacons, seven sub-deacons, and forty-two

acolyths. At a later period, we find three presbyters connected with

each Roman church. There were fourteen regions in the city, and

supposing a congregation in each, there would now be three presbyters,

one deacon or sub-deacon, and three acolyths belonging to each church.

See Blondel's "Apologia," p. 224.

[356:1] Cornelius (Euseb. vi. 43) calls him "a malicious beast," but he

evidently writes under a feeling of deep mortification.

[357:1] Firmilian, "Cypriani Epistolae," lxxv.

[357:2] Matt. xvi. 16-18.

[357:3] John i. 42.

[357:4] See 1 Pet. ii. 5. Peter adds, as if to illustrate Matt. xvi.

18--"Wherefore also it is contained in the Scripture--Behold I lay in

Zion _a chief corner stone_, elect, precious; _and he that believeth on

him shall not be confounded_." 1 Pet. ii. 6.

[358:1] Matt. vii. 24, 25.

[358:2] See Tertullian, "De Praescrip." xxii.; and Cyprian to Cornelius,

Epist. lv. p. 178, where he says--"Petrus, tamen, super quem aedificuta

ab eodem Domino fuerat ecclesia." See also the same epistle, pp. 182,

183, and many other passages.

[358:3] Thus, Cyprian in his letter to Quintus (Epist. lxxi. p. 273)

makes the following awkward attempt to get over the difficulty:--"Nam

nec Petrus, _quem primum Dominus elegit, et super quem aedificavit

ecclesiam suam,_ cum secum Paulus de circumcisione postmodum

disceptaret, vindicavit sibi aliquid insolenter aut arroganter

assumpsit, _ut diceret se primatum tenere et obtemperari a novellis et

posteris sibi potius oportere_."

[359:1] A.D. 325.

[359:2] The Suburbicarian Provinces comprehended the three islands of

Sicily, Corsica, and Sardinia, and the whole of the southern part of

Italy, including Naples and nearly all the territory now belonging to

Tuscany and the States of the Church. See Bingham, iii. p. 20.

[359:3] Basil, Ep. 220.

[360:1] Euseb. vii. 50.

[360:2] Thus we read of "the blessed Pope Cyprian," bishop of Carthage.

Cyprian, Epist. ii. p. 25. The name was sometimes given to the head of a

monastery. In the catacombs there was found an inscription probably to

the memory of a Pope of this description. See Maitland, p. 185. See also

Routh's "Reliquiae," iii. pp. 256, 265.

[360:3] See Bower, "Marcellus," 29th Bishop.

[360:4] That is, from the autumn of A.D. 304 to the spring of A.D. 308.

See Burton's "Lectures on the Ecc. Hist, of the First Three Cent." ii.

p. 433.

[361:1] In the life of Marcellus we read of so many places of worship in

Rome. See "Hist. Platinae De Vitis Pontif. Roman," p. 40, Coloniae,

1593. Optatus speaks of forty churches in Rome at this time; but he is

probably mistaken as to the date. There may have been so many after the

establishment of Christianity by Constantine. There were only fifty

churches in the Western capital in the beginning of the fifth century.

See Neander, i. 276; Edit. Edinburgh, 1847.

[362:1] In Matt. xvi. 18. Opera, tom. ii. p. 344; Edit. Eton, 1612.

[362:2] In Joh. i. 50. Opera, tom. ii. p. 637; Edit. Eton, 1612.

[362:3] "In Johann. Evang. Tractat." 124, § 5. Opera, tom. ix. c. 572.

Augustine had before held the more fashionable view. See "Barrow on the

Pope's Supremacy," by Dr M'Crie, p. 78.

[365:1] The references in this work to the Apostolic Fathers by

Cotelerius are to the Amsterdam Edition, folio, 1724.

[365:2] This is the date assigned to it by Bunsen. "Hippolytus," i. 309.

It is not probable that Polycarp was at the head of the eldership of

Smyrna much earlier. See Period II. sec. iii. chap, v., note.

[365:3] According to Ussher in A.D. 169.

[365:4] See Pearson's "Minor Works," ii. 531.

[366:1] The original narrative may be found in the Dialogue with Trypho.

[366:2] The references to Justin in this work are to the Paris folio

edition of 1615.

[367:1] He afterwards became the founder of a sect noted for its austere

discipline. His followers used water, instead of wine, at the

celebration of the Lord's Supper. They lived in celibacy, and observed

rigorous fasts.

[367:2] The writer says of the temple (chap. xvi.)--"It is now destroyed

by their (the Jews) enemies, and _the servants of their enemies are

building it up._" Jerusalem was rebuilt by Hadrian about A.D. 135, and

the name Aelia given to it.

[368:1] Two short letters ascribed to Pius are mentioned Period II. sec.

iii. chap. vii. For a long time Barnabas, the author of the epistle, was

absurdly confounded with the companion of Paul mentioned Acts xiii. 1,

and elsewhere; and Hermas was supposed to be the individual saluted in

Rom. xvi. 14. Hence these two writers have been called, like Polycarp

and others, _Apostolic Fathers_.

[368:2] Eusebius, who has preserved a few fragments of this author,

describes him as a very credulous person. See his "Hist." iii. 39.

[368:3] In the text it has not been considered necessary to mention all

the writers, however small their contributions to our ecclesiastical

literature, who appeared during the second and third centuries. Hence,

Melito of Sardis, Caius of Rome, and many others are unnoticed. The

remaining fragments of these early ecclesiastical writers may be found

in Routh's "Reliquiae," and elsewhere.

[368:4] [Greek: haemôn, tôn en Keltois diatribontôn kai peri barbaron

dialekton to pleiston ascholoumenôn].--_Contra Haereses_, lib. i. Praef.

[369:1] The references to Irenaeus in this work are to Stieren's edition

of 1853.

[369:2] Wordsworth has remarked that in the "Philosophumena" of

Hippolytus we have some of the lost text of Irenaeus. St Hippolytus, p.

15.

[369:3] Such is the testimony of Jerome. See Cave's "Life of Irenaeus."

[369:4] Euseb. "Hist." iii. 39.

[369:5] Irenaeus adopted the millenarianism of Papias.

[370:1] This is evident from his own statements. See his "Apology," c.

18, and "De Spectaculis," c. 19. The references to Tertullian in this

work are either to the edition of Oehler of 1853, or to that of

Rigaltius of 1675.

[370:2] According to some the population of Carthage at this time

amounted to hundreds of thousands. "The intercourse between Carthage and

Rome, on account of the corn trade alone, was probably more regular and

rapid than with any other part of the Empire."--_Milman's Latin

Christianity_, i. p. 47.

[370:3] See Euseb. ii. 2, 25.

[370:4] Such is the testimony of Jerome, who asserts farther that the

treatment he received from the clergy of Rome induced him to leave that

city.

[370:5] Such as the tracts "De Pallio" and "De Jejuniis."

[371:1] As a choice specimen of his vituperative ability his

denunciation of Marcion may be quoted--"Sed nihil tam barbarum ac triste

apud Pontum quam quod illic Marcion natus est, Scythia tetrior,

Hamaxobio instabilior, Massageta inhumanior, Amazona audacior, nubilo

obscurior, hieme frigidior, gelu fragilior, Istro fallacior, Caucaso

abruptior."--_Adversus Marcionem_, lib. i. c. 1.

[371:2] Victor of Rome, who was contemporary with Tertullian, is said to

have written in Latin, but the extant letters ascribed to him are

considered spurious.

[372:1] Such, according to Jerome, was the practice of Cyprian.

[372:2] He is supposed to have died at an advanced age, but the date of

his demise cannot be accurately determined. Most of his works were

written between A.D. 194 and A.D. 217.

[372:3] The part of the work "Adversus Judaeos," from the beginning of

the ninth chapter, is taken chiefly from the third book of the Treatise

against Marcion, and has apparently been added by another hand.

[374:1] "Admonitio ad Gentes," Opera, p. 69. Edit. Coloniae, 1688.

[374:2] "Stromata," book v.

[374:3] See Kaye's "Clement of Alexandria," p. 378.

[374:4] Period II. sec. i. chap. v. p. 344.

[375:1] Prudentius. See Wordsworth's "Hippolytus," p. 106-112.

[377:1] He had acted literally as described, Matt, xix. 12.

[377:2] Euseb. vi. 3.

[377:3] Euseb. vi. 21.

[378:1] He says Celsus lived in the reign of Hadrian and afterwards.

"Contra Celsum," i. § 8; Opera, tom. i. p. 327. The references to Origen

in this work are to the edition of the Benedictine Delarue, 4 vols.

folio. Paris, 1733-59.

[379:1] The three other Greek versions were those of Aquila, of

Symmachus, and of Theodotion.

[379:2] Origen, in his writings, repeatedly refers to Philo by name. See

Opera, i. 543.

[379:3] See Euseb. ii. c. 17.

[380:1] Thus he declares-"The prophets indicating what is wise

concerning the circumstances of our generation, say that sacrifice is

offered for sin, _even the sin of those newly born_ as not free from

sin, for it is written--'I was shapen in wickedness, and in sin did my

mother conceive me.'"--_Contra Celsum_, vii. § 50.

[380:2] He held, however, that Satan is to be excepted from the general

salvation. See "Epist. ad Amicos Alexandrinos," Opera, i. p. 5.

[381:1] See Sage's "Vindication of the Principles of the Cyprianic Age,"

p. 348. London, 1701.

[382:1] In the case of these epistles, much confusion arises, in the way

of reference, from their various arrangement by different editors. The

references in this work to Cyprian are to the edition of Baluzius,

folio, Venice, 1728. Baluzius, in the arrangement of the letters, adopts

the same order as Pamelius, but Epistle II. of the latter is Epistle I.

of the former, and so on to Epistle XXIII. of Pamelius, which is Epistle

XXII. of the other. Baluzius here conforms exactly to the numeration of

the preceding editor by making Epistle XXIV. immediately follow Epistle

XXII., so that from this to the end of the series the same references

apply equally well to the work of either. The numeration of the Oxford

edition of Bishop Fell is, with a few exceptions, quite different.

[382:2] Mr Shepherd has completely failed in his attempt to disprove the

genuineness of these writings. They are as well attested as any other

documents of antiquity.

[383:1] See Period II. sec. i. chap. ii. p. 302, note.

[383:2] It has not been thought necessary in this chapter to notice

either _Arnobius_, an African rhetorician, who wrote seven Books against

the Gentiles; or the Christian Cicero, _Lactantius_, who is said to have

been his pupil. Both these authors appeared about the end of the period

embraced in this history, and consequently exerted little or no

influence during the time of which it treats.

[384:1] His life was written by Gregory Nyssen about a century after his

death.

[385:1] See a preceding note in this chapter, p. 367.

[385:2] Matt. x. 29.

[385:3] Scorpiace, c. ix.

[385:4] Stromata, book iii.

[385:5] Matt, xviii. 20.

[385:6] "For," says he, "from the first hour to the third, a trinity of

number is manifested; from the fourth on to the sixth, is another

trinity; and in the seventh closing with the ninth, a perfect trinity is

numbered, in spaces of three hours."-_On the Lord's Prayer_, p. 426.

[386:1] "Contra Celsum," v. § 11.

[386:2] Theophilus to Autolycus, lib. ii. § 24.

[386:3] In proof of this see his treatise "Contra Celsum," i. 25, also

"Opera," iii. p. 616, and iv. p. 86.

[386:4] "Contra Haereses," ii. c. xxiv. § 2. See Matt. i. 21.

[386:5] "Contra Haereses," ii. c. xxxv. 3. He seems to have confounded

_Adonai_ and _Yehovah_. The latter word was regarded by the Jews as the

"unutterable" name. Hence it has been thought that in the Latin version

of Irenaeus we should read "innominabile" for "nominabile." See

Stieren's "Irenaeus," i. 418.

[386:6] "Paedagogue," book i. See Gen. xxxii. 28.

[386:7] "Stromata," book v. Sec Gen. xvii. 5. Not a few of these

mistakes may be traced to Philo Judaeus. Thus, this interpretation of

Abraham may be found in his "Questions and Solutions on Genesis," book

iii. 43.

[386:8] "Apol." ii. p. 88.

[386:9] "Dialogue with Trypho," Opera, p. 268.

[386:10] "Apol." ii. p. 76.

[386:11] "Apol." ii. p. 86.

[387:1] "Contra Haereses," ii. c. xxii. § 5.

[387:2] He thus makes His ministry about a year in length. "Adversus

Judaeos," c. viii.

[387:3] "De Cultu Feminarum," lib. i. c. 2, and lib. ii. c. 10.

[387:4] See Kaye's "Tertullian," p. 196. See also Warburton's "Divine

Legation of Moses," i. 510. Edit. London, 1837.

[387:5] "Adversus Hermogenem," c. 35, and "Adversus Praxeam," c. 7.

[389:1] In 1842, Archdeacon Tattam, who had returned only about three

years before from Egypt, where he had been searching for ancient

manuscripts, set out a second time to that country, under the auspices

of the Trustees of the British Museum, chiefly for the purpose of

endeavouring to procure copies of the Ignatian epistles. On this

occasion he succeeded in obtaining possession of the Syriac copy of the

three letters published by Dr. Cureton in 1845. Shortly before the

Revolution of 1688, Robert Huntingdon, afterwards Bishop of Raphoe, and

then chaplain to the British merchants at Aleppo, twice undertook a

voyage to Egypt in quest of copies of the Ignatian epistles. On one of

these occasions he visited the monastery in the Nitrian desert in which

the letters were recently found.

[390:1] Of the writers who have taken a prominent part in the Ignatian

controversy we may particularly mention Ussher, Vossius, Hammond,

Daillé, Pearson, Larroque, Rothe, Baur, Cureton, Hefele, and Bunsen.

[390:2] Matt, xviii. 2-4; Mark ix. 36.

[390:3] There has been a keen controversy respecting the accentuation of

[Greek: Theophoros]. Those who place the accent on the antepenult

([Greek: Theó'phoros]) give it the meaning mentioned in the test; whilst

others, placing the accent on the penult ([Greek: Theophó'ros]),

understand by it _God-bearing_, the explanation given in the "Acts of

the Martyrdom of Ignatius." See Daillé, "De Scriptis quae sub Dionysii

Areop. et Ignatii Antioch. nom. circumferuntur," lib. ii. c. 25; and

Pearson's "Vindiciae Ignatianae," pars. sec. cap. xii.

[391:1] Cave reckons that at the time of his martyrdom he was probably

"above fourscore years old." See his "Life of Ignatius."

[391:2] See Period II. sec. in. chap. v. Evodius is commonly represented

as the first bishop of Antioch.

[392:1] "Fuerunt alii similis amentiae: quos, quia cives Romani erant,

annotavi in Urbem remittendos."--_Plinii_, _Epist_. lib. x. epist. 96.

[392:2] The Greek says the _ninth_, and the Latin the _fourth_ year.

According to both, the condemnation took place _early_ in the reign of

Trajan. See also the first sentence of the "Acts." In his translation of

these "Acts," Wake, regardless of this statement, and in opposition to

all manuscript authority, represents the sentence as pronounced "in the

_nineteenth_ year" of Trajan.

[392:3] See Jacobson's "Patres Apostolici," ii. p. 504. See also

Greswell's "Dissertations," vol. iv. p. 422. It is evident that the date

in the "Acts" cannot be the mistake of a transcriber, for in the same

document the martyrdom is said to have occurred when Sura and Synecius

were consuls. These, as Greswell observes, were actually consuls "in the

_ninth_ of Trajan." Greswell's "Dissertations," iv. p. 416. Hefele,

however, has attempted to show that Trajan was really in Antioch about

this time. See his "Pat. Apost. Opera Prolegomena," p. 35. Edit.

Tubingen, 1842.

[393:1] "Acts of his Martyrdom," § 8.

[393:2] He is said, when at Smyrna, to have been visited by a deputation

from the Magnesians. But had notice been sent to them as soon as he

arrived at Smyrna, the messenger would have required three days to

perform the journey; and had the Magnesians set out instantaneously,

they must have occupied three days more in travelling to him. Thus,

notwithstanding all the precipitation with which he was hurried along,

he could scarcely have been less than a week in Smyrna. See "Corpus

Ignatianum," pp. 326, 327.

[394:1] "He was _pressed_ by the soldiers to _hasten_ to the public

spectacles at great Rome." "And the _wind continuing favourable_ to us,

in one day and night we were _hurried_ on."--_Acts of his Martyrdom_, §

10, 11.

[394:2] Philadelphia is distant from Troas about two hundred miles.

"Corpus Ignatianum," pp. 331, 332. Here, then, is another difficulty

connected with this hasty journey. How could a deputation from

Philadelphia meet Ignatius in Troas, as some allege they did, if he did

not stop a considerable time there? See other difficulties suggested by

Dr Cureton. "Cor. Ignat." p. 332.

[395:1] Such is the opinion maintained by the celebrated Whiston in his

"Primitive Christianity." More recently Meier took up nearly the same

position.

[395:2] See Preface to the "Corpus Ignatianum," p. 4.

[395:3] Published in 1849. In 1846 he published his "Vindiciae

Ignatianae; or the Genuine Writings of St Ignatius, as exhibited in the

ancient Syriac version, vindicated from the charge of heresy."

[396:1] In 1847 another copy of the Syriac version of the three epistles

was deposited in the British Museum, and since, Sir Henry Rawlinson is

said to have obtained a third copy at Bagdad. See "British Quarterly"

for October 1855, p. 452.

[396:2] Dr Lee, late Regius Professor of Hebrew in Cambridge, Chevalier

Bunsen, and other scholars of great eminence, have espoused the views of

Dr Cureton.

[396:3] By Archbishop Ussher in 1644, and by Vossius in 1646.

[396:4] Such was the opinion of Ussher himself. "Concludimus ... nullas

omni ex parte sinceras esse habendas et genuinas." Dissertation prefixed

to his edition of "Polycarp and Ignatius," chap. 18.

[397:1] Pearson was occupied six years in the preparation of this work.

The publication of Daillé, to which it was a reply, appeared in 1666.

Daillé died in 1670, at the advanced age of seventy-six. The work of

Pearson did not appear until two years afterwards, or in 1672. The year

following he received the bishopric of Chester as his reward.

[397:2] "In the whole course of my inquiry respecting the Ignatian

Epistles," says Dr Cureton, "_I have never met with one person who

professes to have read Bishop Pearson's celebrated book_; but I was

informed by one of the most learned and eminent of the present bench of

bishops, that Porson, after having perused the 'Vindiciae,' had

expressed to him his opinion that it was a 'very unsatisfactory

work.'"--_Corpus Ignat._, Preface, pp. 14, 15, note. Bishop Pearson's

work is written in Latin.

[397:3] The "Three Epistles" edited by Dr Cureton contain only about the

_one-fourth_ of the matter of the seven shorter letters edited by

Ussher.

[398:1] Dr Cureton has shewn that even the learned Jerome must have

known very little of these letters. "Corpus Ignat.", Introd. p. 67.

[398:2] Euseb. iii. c. 36.

[399:1] Euseb. i. c. 13.

[399:2] "Corpus Ignatianum," Introd. p. 71.

[399:3] Proleg. in "Cantic. Canticorum," and Homil. vi. in "Lucam."

[399:4] In the Epistle to the Romans, and the Epistle to the Ephesians.

[399:5] He quotes the words--"I am not an incorporeal demon," from the

"Doctrine of Peter;" but they are found in the shorter recension of the

seven letters in the "Epistle to the Smyrnaeans," § 3. Had this epistle

been known to him, he would certainly have quoted from an apostolic

father rather than from a work which he knew to be spurious. See Origen,

"Opera," i. p. 49, note.

[400:1] "Opera," ii. 20, 21; iii. 271.

[400:2] See Period II. sec. ii. chap. i. p. 367. Origen, "Opera," iv.

473.

[400:3] Ibid. p. 368.

[400:4] "Opera," i. 79; iv. 683.

[400:5] "Contra Haereses," lib. v. c. 28, § 4. "Quidam de nostris dixit,

propter martyrium in Deum adjudicatus ad bestias: Quoniam frumentum sum

Christi, et per dentes bestiarum molor, ut mundus panis Dei inveniar."

[401:1] Thus he speaks of "Saturninus, who was from Antioch." "Contra

Haereses," lib. i. c. 24, § 1.

[401:2] It seems to have been soon translated into Syriac. See Bunsen's

"Hippolytus," iv. Preface, p. 8.

[401:3] See large extracts from this letter in Euseb. v. c. i. Also

Routh's "Reliquiae," i. 329.

[402:1] Irenaeus, "Contra Haereses," lib. iii. c. 2, § 1, 2.

[402:2] Lib. iii. c. 3, § 3.

[402:3] Lib. iii. c. iii. § 4.

[402:4] Lib. v. c. xxxiii. § 3, 4.

[402:5] Lib. iv. c. vi. § 2.

[402:6] In his "Vindiciae," (Pars. i. cap. 6,) Pearson attempts to parry

this argument by urging that Irenaeus does not mention other writers,

such as Barnabas, Quadratus, Aristidus, Athenagoras, and Theophilus. But

the reply is obvious--1. These writers were occupied chiefly in

defending Christianity against the attacks of paganism, so that

testimonies against heresy could not be expected in their works. 2. None

of them were so early as Ignatius, so that their testimony, even could

it have been obtained, would have been of less value. Some of them, such

as Theophilus, were the contemporaries of Irenaeus. 3. None of them held

such an important position in the Church as Ignatius.

[403:1] He was martyred A.D. 167, at the age of eighty-six. According to

the Acts of his Martyrdom, Ignatius was martyred sixty years before, or

A.D. 107. Polycarp must, therefore, have been now about twenty-six. See

more particularly Period II. sec. ii. chap. v. note.

[403:2] Sec. 4.

[403:3] Secs. 5, 6.

[403:4] Sec. 11.

[403:5] Sec. 3.

[404:1] [Greek: ou monon en tois makariois Ignatiô, kai Zôsimô, kai

Rouphô, alla kai en allois tois ex humôn].--§ 9.

[404:2] See Baronius, "Annal. ad Annum." 109, tom. ii. c. 48, and

Jacobson's "Pat. Apost." ii. 482, note 6. Edit. Oxon., 1838.

[405:1] Epist. xxxiv. p. 109.

[405:2] "Scripsistis mihi, et vos et Ignatius, ut si quis vadit ad

Syriam, deferat literas meas quas fecero ad vos." The Greek of Eusebius

is somewhat different, but may express the same sense. See Euseb. iii.

36. There is an important variation even in the readings of Eusebius.

See Cotelerius, vol. ii. p. 191, note 3.

[405:3] Thus Bunsen, in his "Ignatius von Antiochen und seine Zeit,"

says--"At the present stand-point of the criticism of Ignatius, this

passage can only be a witness against itself." And, again--"The forger

of Ignatius has interpolated this passage." And, again--"The connexion

is entirely broken by that interpolation." (Pp. 108, 109.) Viewed as a

postscript, it is not remarkable that the transition should be somewhat

abrupt.

[405:4] "Et de ipso Ignatio, et de his qui cum eo sunt, quod certius

agnoveritis, significate."

[406:1] See the "Acts of his Martyrdom," § 10, 12.

[406:2] See this "Epistle," § 1, 9.

[406:3] "Epistolas sane Ignatii, quae transmissae sunt vobis ab eo, et

alias, quantascunque apud nos habuimus, transmisimus vobis." According

to the Greek of Eusebius we should read "The letters of Ignatius which

were sent _to us_ ([Greek: hêmin]) by him." Either reading is alike

perplexing to the advocates of the Syriac version of the Ignatian

epistles. See Jacobson, ii. 489, not. 5.

[406:4] See a preceding note, p. 405.

[407:1] It would seem that only two Greek copies are known to exist,

both wanting the concluding part. See Cotelerius, vol. ii. p. 186,

note 1.

The Ancient Church: Its History, Doctrine, Worship, and Constitution · 第 14 / 15 章