Seventy-seventh Day, Friday, 8 March 1946,
Morning Session 1
Afternoon Session 28
Seventy-eighth Day, Monday, 11 March 1946,
Morning Session 59
Afternoon Session 99
Seventy-ninth Day, Tuesday, 12 March 1946,
Morning Session 135
Afternoon Session 170
Eightieth Day, Wednesday, 13 March 1946,
Morning Session 194
Afternoon Session 230
Eighty-first Day, Thursday, 14 March 1946,
Morning Session 262
Afternoon Session 289
Eighty-second Day, Friday, 15 March 1946,
Morning Session 318
Afternoon Session 333
Eighty-third Day, Saturday, 16 March 1946,
Morning Session 365
Eighty-fourth Day, Monday, 18 March 1946,
Morning Session 396
Afternoon Session 426
Eighty-fifth Day, Tuesday, 19 March 1946,
Morning Session 457
Afternoon Session 475
Eighty-sixth Day, Wednesday, 20 March 1946,
Morning Session 509
Afternoon Session 540
Eighty-seventh Day, Thursday, 21 March 1946,
Morning Session 580
Afternoon Session 614
Eighty-eighth Day, Friday, 22 March 1946,
Morning Session 647
Afternoon Session 673
Eighty-ninth Day, Saturday, 23 March 1946,
Morning Session 696
SEVENTY-SEVENTH DAY
Friday, 8 March 1946
_Morning Session_
THE PRESIDENT (Lord Justice Sir Geoffrey Lawrence): I have three
announcements to make.
First, to avoid unnecessary translation, Defense Counsel shall indicate
to the Prosecution the exact passages in all documents which they
propose to use, in order that the Prosecution may have an opportunity to
object to irrelevant passages. In the event of disagreement between the
Prosecution and the Defense as to the relevancy of any particular
passage, the Tribunal will decide what passages are sufficiently
relevant to be translated. Only the cited passages need be translated,
unless the Prosecution require translation of the entire document.
Second, the Tribunal has received an application from Dr. Nelte, counsel
for the Defendant Keitel, inquiring whether a defendant, in order to
support his memory, may make use of written notes while giving oral
evidence. The Tribunal sanctions the use of written notes by a defendant
in those circumstances, unless in special cases the Tribunal orders
otherwise.
Third, cases have arisen where one defendant has been given leave to
administer interrogatories to or obtain an affidavit from a witness who
will be called to give oral evidence on behalf of another defendant. If
the witness gives his oral evidence before the case is heard in which
the interrogatory or affidavit is to be offered, counsel in the latter
case must elicit the evidence by oral examination, instead of using the
interrogatory or affidavit.
That is all.