XL.

1.—“... _but a slave himself_ ...”

“The domination of either sex over the other paralyses the dominion of

either.”—Ellen Sarah, Lady Bowyer (Letter to _Daily News_, 24th October,

1891).

_Id._...

“Can man be free if woman be a slave?

Chain one who lives, and breathes this boundless air

To the corruption of a closed grave!

Can they whose mates are beasts, condemned to bear

Scorn, heavier far than toil or anguish, dare

To trample their oppressors?”

—Shelley (“The Revolt of Islam,” Canto 2, s. xliii.).

2.—“... _she to shape her own career be free_ ...”

“Not less wrong—perhaps even more foolishly wrong—is the idea that woman

is only the shadow and attendant image of her lord, owing him a

thoughtless and servile obedience, and supported altogether in her

weakness by the pre-eminence of his fortitude. This, I say, is the most

foolish of all errors, respecting her who was made to be the helpmate of

man. As if he could be helped effectively by a shadow, or worthily by a

slave.”—John Ruskin (“Of Queens’ Gardens,” p. 125).

4.—“_Free mistress of her person’s sacred plan_.”

Eliza W. Farnham (in “Woman and Her Era,” Vol. II., p. 92) clearly

enunciates the depth of degradation and slavery from which woman’s

person must be freed:—“When this mastery is established, and ownership

of her becomes a fixed fact, she who was worshipped, vowed to as an

idol, deferred to as a mistress, required to conform herself to nothing

except the very pleasant requirement that she should take her own way in

everything; to come and go, to accept or reject, to do or not, at her

own supreme pleasure—this being may find herself awaking in a state of

subjection which deprives her of the most sacred right to her own

person—makes her the slave of an exacting demand that ignores the

conditions, emotions, susceptibilities, pains, and pleasures of her

life, as tyrannically and systematically as if she were indeed an

insensate chattel.”

Happily, as far as England is concerned, our law no longer lends its

power to enforce such a position.

5.—“_Free human soul_ ...”

Woman’s deep and wholesome impulse and yearning for individual freedom

and selfdom is well-spoken in the following lines, by an anonymous

writer; touchingly shown also is the unsufficingness to her soul of even

the most honeyed of unequal positions:—

“Oh, to be alone!

To escape from the work, the play,

The talking every day;

To escape from all I have done,

And all that remains to do.

To escape—yes, even from you,

My only love, and be

Alone and free.

Could I only stand

Between gray moor and gray sky,

Where the winds and the plovers cry,

And no man is at hand;

And feel the free wind blow

On my rain-wet face, and know

I am free—not yours, but my own—

Free, and alone!

For the soft firelight

And the home of your heart, my dear,

They hurt, being always here.

I want to stand upright,

And to cool my eyes in the air,

And to see how my back can bear

Burdens—to try, to know,

To learn, to grow!

I am only you!

I am yours, part of you, your wife!

And I have no other life.

I cannot think, cannot do;

I cannot breathe, cannot see;

There is ‘us,’ but there is not ‘me’:—

And worst, at your kiss I grow

Contented so.”

7.—“_From woman slave can come but menial race_,”

“If the result to the family is such as I have described what must be

the effect on the race? A slow but sure degeneration. And has this not

taken place? Is the race now such as you read of it in early times

before the Mogul invasion brought the Zenana and child-marriage in its

train? Where are the Rajputs and the Mahrattas with their manly

exercises and their mental vigour? For centuries you have been children

of children, and there is no surer way of becoming servants of

servants.”—Mrs. Pechey Phipson, M.D. (“Address to the Hindoos,” p. 9).

_Id._... “If children are to be educated to understand the true

principle of patriotism, their mother must be a patriot.”—Mary

Wollstonecraft (Letter to Talleyrand).

8.—“_The mother free confers her freedom and her grace_.”

“The child follows the blood of the mother; the son of a slave or serf

father and a noble woman is noble. ‘It is the womb which dyes the

child,’ they say in their primitive language.... ‘The woman bears the

clan,’ say the Wyandot Indians, just as our ancestors said ‘The womb

dyes the child!’”—Letourneau (“The Evolution of Marriage,” Ch. XI.,

XVII.).

Woman free · 第 114 / 146 题