ON LAZINESS

[Illustration]

To-day we rather intended to write an essay on Laziness, but were too

indolent to do so.

The sort of thing we had in mind to write would have been exceedingly

persuasive. We intended to discourse a little in favour of a greater

appreciation of Indolence as a benign factor in human affairs.

It is our observation that every time we get into trouble it is due to

not having been lazy enough. Unhappily, we were born with a certain fund

of energy. We have been hustling about for a number of years now, and

it doesn't seem to get us anything but tribulation. Henceforward we are

going to make a determined effort to be more languid and demure. It is

the bustling man who always gets put on committees, who is asked to

solve the problems of other people and neglect his own.

The man who is really, thoroughly, and philosophically slothful is the

only thoroughly happy man. It is the happy man who benefits the world.

The conclusion is inescapable.

We remember a saying about the meek inheriting the earth. The truly meek

man is the lazy man. He is too modest to believe that any ferment and

hubbub of his can ameliorate the earth or assuage the perplexities of

humanity.

O. Henry said once that one should be careful to distinguish laziness

from dignified repose. Alas, that was a mere quibble. Laziness is always

dignified, it is always reposeful. Philosophical laziness, we mean. The

kind of laziness that is based upon a carefully reasoned analysis of

experience. Acquired laziness. We have no respect for those who were

born lazy; it is like being born a millionaire: they cannot appreciate

their bliss. It is the man who has hammered his laziness out of the

stubborn material of life for whom we chant praise and allelulia.

The laziest man we know--we do not like to mention his name, as the

brutal world does not yet recognize sloth at its community value--is

one of the greatest poets in this country; one of the keenest satirists;

one of the most rectilinear thinkers. He began life in the customary

hustling way. He was always too busy to enjoy himself. He became

surrounded by eager people who came to him to solve their problems.

"It's a queer thing," he said sadly; "no one ever comes to me asking for

help in solving _my_ problems." Finally the light broke upon him. He

stopped answering letters, buying lunches for casual friends and

visitors from out of town, he stopped lending money to old college pals

and frittering his time away on all the useless minor matters that

pester the good-natured. He sat down in a secluded cafe with his cheek

against a seidel of dark beer and began to caress the universe with his

intellect.

The most damning argument against the Germans is that they were not lazy

enough. In the middle of Europe, a thoroughly disillusioned, indolent

and delightful old continent, the Germans were a dangerous mass of

energy and bumptious push. If the Germans had been as lazy, as

indifferent, and as righteously laissez-fairish as their neighbours, the

world would have been spared a great deal.

People respect laziness. If you once get a reputation for complete,

immovable, and reckless indolence the world will leave you to your own

thoughts, which are generally rather interesting.

Doctor Johnson, who was one of the world's great philosophers, was lazy.

Only yesterday our friend the Caliph showed us an extraordinarily

interesting thing. It was a little leather-bound notebook in which

Boswell jotted down memoranda of his talks with the old doctor. These

notes he afterward worked up into the immortal Biography. And lo and

behold, what was the very first entry in this treasured little relic?

Doctor Johnson told me in going to Ilam from Ashbourne, 22

September, 1777, that the way the plan of his Dictionary came to

be addressed to Lord Chesterfield was this: He had neglected to

write it by the time appointed. Dodsley suggested a desire to

have it addressed to Lord C. Mr. J. laid hold of this as an

excuse for delay, that it might be better done perhaps, and let

Dodsley have his desire. Mr. Johnson said to his friend, Doctor

Bathurst: "Now if any good comes of my addressing to Lord

Chesterfield it will be ascribed to deep policy and address,

when, in fact, it was only a casual excuse for laziness."

Thus we see that it was sheer laziness that led to the greatest triumph

of Doctor Johnson's life, the noble and memorable letter to Chesterfield

in 1775.

Mind your business is a good counsel; but mind your idleness also. It's

a tragic thing to make a business of your mind. Save your mind to amuse

yourself with.

The lazy man does not stand in the way of progress. When he sees

progress roaring down upon him he steps nimbly out of the way. The lazy

man doesn't (in the vulgar phrase) pass the buck. He lets the buck pass

him. We have always secretly envied our lazy friends. Now we are going

to join them. We have burned our boats or our bridges or whatever it is

that one burns on the eve of a momentous decision.

Writing on this congenial topic has roused us up to quite a pitch of

enthusiasm and energy.

Pipefuls · 第 96 / 101 题