SIEGE OF MOSCOW
Mamai fled from Kulikovo and assembled a fresh and numerous army to
take revenge on Dmitri for his triumph. But suddenly a new enemy rose
up against him: Tohtamish, made Khan only recently by Tamerlane,
declared himself heir of Batu, and set out from the Yaik River to take
possession of his inheritance. Mamai marched forth to meet him, and on
that renowned field near the Kalka, the field where Mystislav the
Gallant had been vanquished, the Mongols met now to slaughter one
another. Tohtamish triumphed. Mamai’s perfidious murzars fell at the
feet of the conqueror, and swore to serve him faithfully all their
lives. Mamai fled to Kaffa, the present Theodosia, taking with him rich
treasures. “He went with much gold, silver, jewels and pearls, and was
slain by the Genoese deceitfully.” They seized all his property, secure
in the knowledge that the death of Mamai would please the new Khan
greatly. The position of the Genoese was precarious in those days, and
they strove always to please in every way possible the Mongol Khan who
was in power.
Master now of the Golden Horde, Tohtamish sent envoys to Moscow and all
other places, stating that he had conquered Mamai, their common enemy,
and had taken possession of Sarai. The unexpected and uninvited guests
were received nowhere with pleasure; still they were entertained with
honor and dismissed with presents and politeness; but those things were
not what the new Khan was seeking. He wished to see the Russians just
such slaves as they had been under Batu and Uzbek.
In 1381, Tohtamish sent an envoy, Ak Hodja, with a suite of seven
hundred, to Dmitri to demand that all princes should visit him
immediately. But when he reached Nizni, the envoy dared not go farther.
The Grand Prince had sent a message saying that he could not answer for
the safety of Ak Hodja or that of his suite, should they continue their
journey to Moscow. Ak Hodja then sent attendants to consult with
Dmitri, but even those, when they saw the resentment of Russians, did
not venture to enter the capital. Indignation against messengers
bringing insolent demands from men who had fled from the battle-field
of Kulikovo was pardonable on the part of the victors, but in the lofty
answer of Dmitri was heard a note which had never been heard from him
earlier, and this note was not to the profit of Russia.
After the victory at Kulikovo, Dmitri was so confident that he did not
think it necessary to assemble new forces, and be ready for battle.
Trusting too much in Mongol weakness, he turned his attention to home
questions. Feeling the need of a metropolitan, it was decided to summon
Cyprian, who had been expelled from Moscow. An embassy was sent to him,
and on May 23, 1381, he returned, and was received in the city with
great solemnity. On that same day was announced the coming of Pimen,
ordained at Tsargrad in place of Mityai. But, as already stated, upon
his arrival at Kolomna, he was arrested and sent off to Chuhloma. Thus
the Grand Prince passed the year occupied in home affairs, till news
came on a sudden that, in the land of the Bulgars, the Mongols had
arrested Russian merchants, had seized their boats, and in those boats
they were now sending warriors toward Moscow.
When Dmitri insulted and threatened Tohtamish’s envoy, serious work
began at once at the Horde. A daring campaign was planned and
preparations were made in strict secrecy. Tohtamish wished to surprise
Moscow and capture it. Every man who could give news to the capital was
seized and held securely; strong pickets were stationed at all points.
Even reports could not go to Dmitri. At last, however, in spite of
every precaution, news reached Moscow, but too late to be of service.
Dmitri learned of the terrible power of his enemy only when many
Russian princes had already joined Tohtamish.
In this absence of union among princes lay the peril of Moscow. The
great need was to root out this remnant of a system of semi-independent
princes, a system no longer endurable, and unite the whole country.
Moscow had done much in that direction, already. The victory on the Don
was proof of what Russia could do when princes were united. But the
more Dmitri gained, the less did other princes find in union their
personal profit, and profit was all that most of them cared for at that
time. They had helped to strengthen Moscow, but they had no wish to
raise the Moscow prince higher.
Dmitri of Nizni, when he heard of the Tohtamish movement, sent his two
sons very promptly to the Horde with gifts, but the Khan was already on
the road. By rushing after him quickly, they came up to Tohtamish in
Ryazan. Oleg, whose treachery in Mamai’s day had been forgiven by the
Grand Prince, now betrayed Moscow a second time. He went out to meet
the Khan, gave him many presents, offered to guide him in person, and
advised as to how to take the capital.
Surprised now for the first time, Dmitri was discouraged. It was too
late to find troops. At first he thought to entrench himself near
Kolomna, but, on summoning his voevodas and available warriors, he
discovered the astonishing weakness of his army, and, after consulting
with his cousin, decided that with such troops he could do nothing
effective. Some advised sending gifts, and begging for mercy; others
said that the Khan was raging, that the only way was to stand sieges in
cities, and wait till men could be assembled from all points. The Grand
Prince decided to visit Yaroslavl, Rostoff, Kostroma, and find men
there. Vladimir was to hurry to Volok and get warriors in those parts.
Meanwhile the Khan’s troops were rapidly approaching. In his army were
Dmitri’s brothers-in-law; Oleg of Ryazan was there also.
In Kostroma the Grand Prince enrolled perhaps ten thousand men. From
Novgorod no word had come thus far. The Tver prince, instead of helping
Dmitri, sent his son to the Khan with gifts and homage. Many warriors
in Dmitri’s regiments deserted; whole companies went home of their own
accord. There was a general paralysis. In Moscow, deserted by the army
and left without a leader, there was anarchy. All who were able hurried
out of the city, and then appeared vagrants and persons who in ordinary
times were not visible anywhere. The mob rang the bells and summoned
the inhabitants to die in defense of their city. The Grand Princess and
her children left Moscow, as did the metropolitan Cyprian. The people
wished to keep the metropolitan with them, but, leaving all things and
every one, he escaped unobserved and unattended, and fled to the Tver
prince. The mob was like a sea in a tempest; there was no hope of
rescue from any side.
All at once Prince Ostei appeared in the capital with a small group of
warriors. The crowd did not know well who this prince was, or whence he
came. Some declared him a son of Oleg; but in every case they were
delighted, for it was clear that he knew well the art of war. There was
more order after his coming. A great number of people assembled from
the environs, and Ostei, before shutting the gates of the Kremlin,
admitted all who would enter. The main defenders, however, were a
rabble, the lowest of the city, and a few merchants, abbots, priests,
monks and deacons, men of all ages, and women, some even with infants.
August 15, 1382, the smoke and the light of distant burning announced
the approach of Tohtamish and his forces. On August 22 he was near the
city and sent his advance-guard to strike at the Kremlin. The Mongols
examined the ramparts, rode around the walls, estimated the depth of
the moats, and looked at points whence attack might be possible.
Approaching the gates, they shouted: “Is the Grand Prince in Moscow?”
They received no answer, and toward evening they vanished. Next morning
the Khan came himself and laid siege to the Kremlin.
The nondescript mob in the city robbed, drank, and rioted. Prince
Ostei, who was defending the fortress, was unable to repress the
disorder; he was fighting on the walls and greatly occupied. He met all
assaults with success, and wherever the enemy tried to carry a position
he drove them back effectively. The Mongols had no wall-breaking
engines. For three days Tohtamish was baffled at every point. The
fourth morning the besieged were astounded,—it was silent and quiet in
the camp of the enemy. Soon a party of richly dressed warriors rode
toward the Kremlin, princes of the Horde, with a suite in large
numbers. In front of all were the brothers-in-law of the Grand Prince,
Simeon and Vassili, sons of Dmitri of Nizni. The suite made signs that
they came for peace, and were allowed to ride up to the defenses. “The
Khan wishes to show his people grace,” said they. “He has come not
against you, who are guilty of nothing. Our sovereign has not come to
strike you, but Dmitri. He is not angry with you,—ye are worthy of
favor. He only asks you to come out with small gifts and show honor; he
desires nothing further.” The same words were repeated by Dmitri’s two
brothers-in-law, whom the Khan had sent also to parley. These Nizni
princes declared that Tohtamish had sworn to harm no one, and to take
nothing save that which was given him with honor. Simeon seized the
cross from his neck and kissed it to prove his sincerity.
Prince Ostei and all who had wisdom believed not, but many, even of
those who seemed wise, were pleased at this way of ending the struggle.
The mob, from being warlike, called for peace, and opposed Prince
Ostei, the commander. “He alone,” said they, “keeps up this struggle;
we must stop it.” The prince turned to the best of the people with
these words: “Wait only a little; the Grand Prince and his cousin are
coming with reinforcements. The Khan has only a small army; ye must not
believe those two princes from Nizni. Above all put no trust in the
words of Tohtamish; his promises are worthless.” But the mob would not
listen. From the walls they made the Horde princes take oath to harm no
one. The Nizni princes swore in the same sense a second time. The
clergy went out then with images and crosses. Prince Ostei, with the
best of the citizens, followed. Next came a great crowd of people with
gifts, and with homage. When the procession drew near the enemy’s camp,
sabres flashed up on all sides. The Mongols snatched the holy images
and crosses from the clergy, threw them on the ground and trampled
them; then they cut down priests and people. The whole square in front
of the Kremlin was soon streaming with blood. Next they rushed through
the gates like a torrent, and slew all inside the Kremlin. There was no
place of refuge. Those who fled to churches were slaughtered there. All
were slain without distinction. Everything of value was taken from the
churches, and not one book escaped destruction. All the wealth
collected during long years of labor was lost in that one day of
terror, August 26, 1382.
Tohtamish feasted among the ruins of Moscow, and sent men in every
direction, to Vladimir, Pereyaslavl and other places, for plunder. The
division which went to Volok was met by Vladimir the Brave, who
defeated it thoroughly, killing, it was said, six thousand Mongols.
When the remnant of those Mongols returned, Tohtamish recalled his
plundering parties, and withdrew to Sarai with immense booty, and a
great crowd of captives. On the way he burned Kolomna, and plundered
Oleg’s lands unmercifully. But through an envoy he sent thanks to
Dmitri of Nizni for sending his sons as assistants.
Moscow was filled with decaying corpses; people of every age and
condition were lying there dead, and every building was either burned
to the earth, or in ruins. Twenty-four thousand people were buried by
Dmitri when he came back to his capital.
The princes of Ryazan, Tver, and Nizni gained nothing by their
disloyalty to the Grand Prince. Oleg of Ryazan suffered heavily when
the Khan was retiring from Moscow, and Dmitri, who had forgiven Oleg’s
perfidy in Mamai’s day, now made him pay dearly for aiding the men who
burned the capital.
As reward to the Nizni prince, Tohtamish gave the grand patent and
returned to him his son Simeon; but he gave him no help to win
Vladimir, and retained Vassili, the second son, as hostage.
When Michael of Tver and his son went to the Horde with rich gifts, the
Khan’s intimates promised every aid, but time passed while Michael
spent much and gained nothing save promises. The metropolitan, Cyprian,
favored Michael, and would not return to Moscow, though two boyars were
sent to conduct him; as a result of this disobedience he was banished a
second time in favor of Pimen.
Upon Dmitri’s return to Moscow, he called back the people who had fled
to other places to save themselves and rebuilt the city with energy. He
was at a loss as to how to treat Mamai’s successor, when Tohtamish
himself settled the problem. The Khan, seeing that Dmitri was not
prepared to visit Sarai, or send boyars with his homage, despatched a
gracious embassy to Moscow, while the city was still in ruins. Men knew
at the capital that Tohtamish had sent the Nizni prince a patent to the
Grand Principality. It was known also that Michael of Tver had tried,
through much gold and silver, to get the same patent, with the addition
of Novgorod, but Karatch, the Khan’s envoy, declared to Dmitri that
Tohtamish would not displace him; he had satisfied his anger, and the
past was forgotten. They gave good presents to the envoy who had come
with this information, and conducted him homeward with honor.
In 1383 the Grand Prince, no matter how grievous it might be, had to
show the Khan honor by sending his heir, Vassili, a boy of twelve years
of age, to give homage. Important boyars went with him. Michael of Tver
was then at the Horde, negotiating for the patent. He had more wealth
than the Moscow prince, but Dmitri’s boyars referred to previous
charters, especially that of Chanibek, who had confirmed the Moscow
primacy forever, and then they showed the original document. Tohtamish,
who rested his own claims on regular descent, and wished to honor his
ancestor in order to strengthen his own power with the past of the
Golden Horde, gave Dmitri the charter.
Michael of Tver, greatly grieved and disappointed, left the Horde,
complaining specially against that Mongol prince, who had promised him
success beyond peradventure. “I know my possessions,” said Tohtamish,
while dismissing him. “All the Russian princes are living on land which
belongs to me. Let each live on that which falls to him by usage. If he
serves me with truth, I will reward him. Dmitri offended me, I punished
him; he serves me now truthfully, hence I reward him. Do thou go to
Tver, and serve there as is proper; thee also will I reward in time.”
The Khan dismissed Michael, but kept Michael’s son as a hostage.
The evil rule of the new Khan was distinguished for uncertainty:
Tamerlane had given the throne to him, but once in power, Tohtamish,
wishing to be independent, dared to measure forces with that great
conqueror. He raised his hand against his protector and invaded
Samarkand, Tamerlane’s capital; next he attacked Persian regions and
found there a terrible answer. He received blow after blow, one more
deadly than the other, from the great Mongol, who had conquered a large
part of Asia. At last the final blow struck him. These campaigns, with
the dread of his master and the preparations to ward off invasions,
drew away Tohtamish, whose absences from Sarai were protracted and
frequent. At times it seemed as if Mongol power in Russia had ended,
and then Dmitri’s authority appeared in its vigor. But that was in the
last period of Tohtamish’s reign.
Subjection to Tohtamish was at first very grievous; it recalled the
worst days of Uzbek’s reign. Vassili, the heir of the Grand Prince,
sent to the Horde to render homage, was detained most ungraciously for
more than two years. Again Russian princes went to get patents, and
complain one against another.
In 1383 the Nizni prince died, and no matter how Simeon and Vassili
strove for their father’s inheritance, the Khan, not wishing to offend
Boris, their uncle, gave Nizni to him, and to them he left Suzdal; but
one of the brothers, Vassili, he kept at the Horde as a hostage. A
quarrel rose now between the uncle and his nephews, and the nephews
turned to Dmitri of Moscow to help them. Since Nizni had been
considered as connected with Moscow, Dmitri might not wish his
brothers-in-law to win Nizni, as they had not scrupled to help
Tohtamish; still it would be easier to get Nizni from them than from
their uncle. Therefore, in 1387, the Grand Prince assisted them to
Nizni. Boris, who had suffered much in struggling with Moscow, said
then to his nephews: “My dear children, I weep now because of you;
later on you will weep because of another,” hinting thus at future
absorption of Nizni by Moscow. The brothers got Nizni at the price of
subjection to Moscow, which after that held Nizni as its own land
forever. Thus, after a period, Dmitri again paid small respect to the
Mongols.
In 1385, Oleg of Ryazan prepared to avenge on Dmitri the blow which the
latter had dealt him because of aid given the Horde in their conflict
with Moscow. He seized Kolomna, and, following this seizure, a bloody
war broke out between the two princes. Vladimir the Brave led the army
of Moscow. The Ryazan prince suffered heavily, but so did Dmitri. One
battle especially was noted for stubbornness; many of the best men on
both sides were slain. Dmitri offered peace, but Oleg was haughty; no
matter what offers were made, he was insolent. The Grand Prince, who
had grieved much under Mongol subjection, was crushed by the endless
strife among princes, so he sent to the Troitski monastery, and begged
holy Sergai to visit Oleg on a mission.
Sergai was revered throughout Russia and famed, as the chronicler tells
us, for gifts from the Holy Spirit. He so discoursed with Oleg that he
changed all his venom to kindness, and made final peace between the two
princes. After that there was no war either between Oleg and Dmitri, or
between their descendants. This same year, 1385, Dmitri had a son
christened Peter, and Sergai was his godfather.
The following year Feodor, son of Oleg, married Sophia, a daughter of
the Grand Prince. Dmitri’s next act was to bring Novgorod to reason.
Counting on the weakness of Moscow after the war with Oleg, Novgorod
neglected all obligations, and it was only after an attack on the city,
in which many princes assisted, that Dmitri maintained his position.
Novgorod then paid its dues and signed a new treaty.
After his son had been absent nearly three years at Sarai, Dmitri
obtained the Khan’s consent to his return. Freed at last from
detention, the young prince hurried off with great gladness. Before
returning to Moscow, however, he passed a year in Romania and Western
Russia. He went then to Lutsk on a visit to Vitold, in whose daughter,
Sophia, he saw a young woman who charmed him. Vitold’s mother, the
priestess Biruta, was famous for beauty, and had enchanted Keistut,
Vitold’s father. Biruta’s beauty may have been reflected in her
granddaughter. Anna, Vitold’s wife, who had saved him from prison and
death, might also have added her quota of comeliness. Sophia, in every
case, was a beautiful girl. Dmitri sent boyars to accompany Vassili on
his journey home, and charged them to bring Vitold to friendship. In
this they succeeded, and Vassili left Lutsk as the betrothed of Sophia.
The meeting of this youth with his father after four years of absence
was joyous. That was the time, as Dmitri had decided, to declare him
his heir, the coming Grand Prince.
Among Dmitri’s many troubles the one which weighed him down always was
that of succession. By raising their principality to be the central
land of all Russia, the sons and grandsons of Kalitá had placed Moscow
on a height unexampled, hence they looked on inheritance very
differently from others. Dmitri wished to fix primogeniture in his
line. The tendency to this came through favoring causes. Simeon the
Proud, Kalitá’s son and successor, was obeyed by Ivan and Andrei, his
younger brothers, as if he had been their own father. Simeon died
without heirs; almost at the same time died Andrei, so when Ivan
reigned in Moscow, after Simeon, he had no brothers. At Ivan’s death he
was succeeded by his one son, Dmitri, whose brother, Ivan, had died
early, hence there was only one descendant of Kalitá contemporary with
Dmitri, his cousin Vladimir, Andrei’s orphan. Vladimir, afterward
surnamed the Brave, was Dmitri’s lifelong trusty comrade. They were
“one man,” as people said who knew them. Dmitri became Grand Prince at
twelve, but his cousin was younger. The pillars of the Moscow
principality, the guardians of Dmitri and Vladimir, fixed in a treaty
the position of each prince to the other. This treaty declared that
Andrei’s father bound himself to serve his elder brother without
disobedience, to serve his principality with faith and fear. Vladimir
received only the possessions which had belonged to Andrei, his father,
while to Dmitri went all the rest, that is, what had belonged to his
father, Ivan, and to Simeon, his uncle. He reserved also the right in
certain cases to execute Vladimir’s boyars.
About ten years later, when Dmitri was going to the Horde to reconcile
the Khan with Moscow, he made a will in favor of his own son, Vassili,
born a few months earlier. A new treaty was made then with Vladimir,
who, to expressions of obedience to Dmitri, added: “I am not to seek
the Grand Principality against thee, or against thy children.” This is
a short line placed unobtrusively in a long list of settlements and
properties; but this line, almost unnoticeable among hundreds of names
of villages and places which formed the greater part of the document,
is remarkable, especially through the addition “or against thy
children.” It is clear that the inheritance of the Moscow throne from
father to eldest son, not being in accord with ancient usage, was not
yet firmly established. Toward the end of Dmitri’s reign, this became
the greatest of all the cares which weighed on him. Living, as it were,
in one family with his cousin, a friend faithful and devoted, his only
near relative, peerless for magnanimity, a man who had “a golden
heart,” as Dmitri himself declared with much emphasis, it was all the
more difficult to touch upon this very delicate question. It was
possible at first to avoid it, and for years say no word on the
subject, but at last came the hour when it was necessary to decide the
great question: Who shall inherit the throne on the death of Dmitri? If
Vassili were heir, the new form of state, begun since Kalitá’s day,
would triumph. If Dmitri’s cousin, Vladimir, were heir, the ancient
order would win, to the ruin of all that Moscow had accomplished during
five decades of dreadful effort.
Again the question might be considered as not very urgent, not
demanding immediate decision, for Dmitri was not yet forty years old,
and was strong to all seeming; but in fact he was feeble. He had no
external wound, but he had never recovered completely from the internal
injuries received on the field of Kulikovo. Moreover, as his son was
about to marry, the question rose naturally: Was Vladimir, the cousin,
to yield seniority to Vassili?
Would Prince Vladimir, who had been so magnanimous as to yield to
Dmitri, yield now and make Dmitri’s son his senior?
Beyond doubt the trouble was more with Vladimir’s boyars than with
Vladimir. Only boyars of reduced princes yielded, and went to serve
strong ones. The boyars of Vladimir of Moscow, whose rights were
undoubted according to the ancient rule of the country, could not be
yielding in this case. They defended their honor and profit together
with ancient legality in defending Vladimir; they were far more
insistent than he was. Consequently, the year of 1388 was beclouded by
a quarrel between the Moscow princes. Dmitri seized certain of
Vladimir’s boyars, and sent them to places where they were “kept under
guard very firmly.” The honor of the boyars who defended his position
so faithfully was of course dear to Vladimir, and he had to take part
with them; hence rose a quarrel which grieved all the people.
But at the beginning of 1389 the quarrel ended, and the friendship of
the princes was greater than ever. They made a new treaty and kissed
the cross to observe it. By this treaty Vladimir recognized the Grand
Prince to be his elder brother as before, and to be his father, and for
himself and his children renounced every claim to the headship of
Moscow; yielding seniority to Dmitri’s heirs, and to all their sons
with them; recognizing Vassili, son of Dmitri, as his eldest brother,
the second son, Yuri, a brother of his age, and the younger sons as
younger brothers, adding, besides, that he would not seek the throne as
against any of them. The Grand Prince, on his part, called Vladimir not
only his younger brother, as before, but his son. With such a solemn
declaration was the question decided, a question which for a short time
had disturbed the long harmony of the family.
All glorified the magnanimity of Kalitá’s youngest grandson, who had
done so much for Moscow by helping to establish the first principle of
inheritance from father to eldest son.
Two months had not passed after making the treaty, when Dmitri was a
living man no longer. Dmitri won glory at Kulikovo, and raised Moscow
in popular esteem to a height unattainable by other principalities.
Dmitri, by careful insistence and management in winning from Vladimir
his renunciation of rights, and Vladimir, by yielding, established
single rule in Russia, which, without these two men, might never have
been established.
Vassili’s first act on succeeding his father was to send two noted
boyars, Poleff and Belevut, with attendants, for his bride, Vitold’s
daughter, Sophia. Her father had taken refuge at that time in Prussia,
and was preparing for war with his cousin, Yagello, who had killed
Keistut, Vitold’s father. Vitold was seeking aid among the Knights of
the Cross against his cousin. It was pleasant for him, at that crisis
in his career, to receive envoys from the Grand Prince of Moscow.
Sophia journeyed by sea to Livonia, and thence through Pskoff and
Novgorod to Moscow.
Two years after his marriage, Vassili visited the Horde, and then, by
agreement with Tohtamish, united to Moscow the Nizni principality as
well as Gorodets, Tarus, and Murom. There was trouble with Novgorod,
which caused bloodshed, but all was arranged before 1395, when the
second of the world-shaking Mongols came to punish Tohtamish for his
perfidy, and to give the entire Kipchak realm to the “ruinous wind of
destruction,” Tamerlane’s own words.
No Khan after Tohtamish was able to restore power and unity to Kipchak.
Batu and Uzbek being the first and second, Tohtamish was the third
powerful ruler of Kipchak. The exalted estimate which the man made of
himself caused the mortal struggle with Tamerlane, to whom Tohtamish
owed his dominion.
A direct descendant of Jinghis, Tohtamish could not brook the lofty
lordship of Tamerlane, who was not descended from Jinghis, though he
and that mighty ruler had a common great-grandfather. Tohtamish
affected to see in Tamerlane a second Mamai upstart, and in 1392 set
out to destroy him as he had destroyed Mamai. The motive for action was
found in the taking by Tamerlane of places east of the Caspian, but
mainly Urgendj, a city on the Oxus famed for its marvelous defense, the
same city which had occasioned the quarrel between Jinghis and his
eldest son, Juchi, a quarrel which was never ended.
Tohtamish began by attacking regions bordering on Kipchak, regions
belonging to Tamerlane. Tamerlane moved promptly from his capital and
wintered near Tashkent, where he assembled an immense army. During that
year he moved northward toward the Tobola River, and, turning to the
west, reached the Yaik River May 29. He crossed at a place of which
Tohtamish was not thinking and, continuing the march, found the Khan at
some point near the Volga. Tohtamish had also assembled great forces.
In his army were Bulgars of the Kama, mountaineers of the Caucasus,
Bashkirs and Russians.
Though it was June the weather was severe, and snow fell for several
days in succession. At last, on the eighteenth, the sun broke through
the clouds and the weather cleared. Before battle Tamerlane, having
arranged his warriors in seven divisions ready for attack, prayed to
God, prostrating himself three times. Then the army deployed to the
cry, “Allah akbar!” (God is great), and with the shout “Surun!”
(charge), the battle began. It was prolonged and stubborn beyond
example, but the art of Jinghis, notably improved by Tamerlane, also
the great skill and luck of the latter, and the quarrels and treachery
of commanders of the other side, gained the day and brought success to
Tamerlane. Tohtamish fled across the Volga, while his scattered hordes
were hunted by the victor and few of his warriors escaped. Tamerlane
camped on the battle-field and gave thanks to God for the victory.
The Golden Horde, though it survived this terrible defeat, never
regained its former strength. Tamerlane plundered the country and went
home, taking legions of captives, with cattle, and treasures of all
kinds. But the end was not yet. Tohtamish returned to his capital and
ruled there. He brought the whole Horde back to order. Three years
passed. Tamerlane had fixed his camp on the southern side of the
Caucasus, on the banks of the Cyrus, and there he learned that
Tohtamish was preparing for a new and more serious encounter. Tamerlane
thereupon sent a letter to Tohtamish in which he asked if he had
forgotten his last terrible defeat. He reminded him how he, Tamerlane,
always treated those kindly who treated him kindly, while he pursued
with vengeance those who were his enemies. He reminded him also of his
own great success, which made him indifferent whether he was at peace
or at war with the Khan of the Golden Horde. Then, marching forward
promptly to find Tohtamish, Tamerlane passed through the Gates of
Derbend to the northern side of the mountains, where, to begin the
campaign worthily, he exterminated the Kaitaks, subjects of Tohtamish,
and then advancing, met his rival near the Terek.
The position of Tohtamish was strong, and protected by wagons arranged
in the form of a barricade, but on Tamerlane’s approach he abandoned it
and retired. Tamerlane now crossed the Terek, and the armies faced each
other on the fourteenth of April; on the twenty-second the conflict
began.
This second battle showed that Tohtamish had not greatly overestimated
his own power, that he was almost the equal of his opponent. The main
body of Tamerlane’s army was commanded by his son, Muhammed Sultan,
while he himself commanded twenty-seven companies of picked warriors
who formed a reserve. Tamerlane’s left wing was thrown into disorder
and his center forced back. When the son-in-law of Tohtamish advanced
upon his right wing, Tamerlane charged upon him at the head of his
twenty-seven companies and drove him back. But his men, following too
far, were in turn driven back and their ranks broken. Tamerlane would
have been captured but for the aid of Nur ud din, who came to his
rescue with fifty warriors. The battle was furious, but at last a quick
rally in front and a rear attack on the Kipchaks saved the day, though
very narrowly. The Kipchak troops gave way and Tohtamish fled. On that
field strewn with corpses, Tamerlane knelt down and thanked Heaven for
his triumph. Then to Nur ud din, who had rescued him, he presented a
magnificent horse, a robe of gold brocade, a jeweled girdle, and a
large sum of money.
Tamerlane’s victory brought no rest to the enemy, however. This time he
hunted Tohtamish far toward the north, and ravaged all places, sending
strong forces east as far as the Volga, and west to the banks of the
Dnieper. He reached Ryazan’s southern borders and destroyed Eletsk,
with its prince and people. Then the “Iron Limper,” as Russians called
Tamerlane, moved northward, destroying all within reach of his army.
Vassili of Moscow hurriedly assembled his forces, and, entrusting the
capital to his father’s cousin, Vladimir, led his own men to the Oká to
confront the invader. He now wrote to the metropolitan to bring from
Vladimir to Moscow that image of the Mother of God, which Andrei
Bogolyubski had borne with him from Vyshgorod to the northern country.
With great honor and reverence the image was brought. A procession of
ecclesiastics and boyars met it on the Kutchkovo Field outside Moscow,
and it was placed in the Assumption Cathedral, where the people prayed
before it, repeating “Mother of God, save Russia!” To the influence of
this image was ascribed the retreat of Tamerlane’s army, which took
place August 26, at the hour when the holy image was met by the people.
We may suppose that the approach of autumn, and the poverty of the
country, ruined so often by Mongols, were not without influence in
saving the capital.
Tamerlane, on his march, destroyed the rich city of Azoff, a
meeting-place for Venetians and Genoese, near the mouth of the Don.
Afterward he moved southward, attacking mountain tribes of the Caucasus
as he passed them, till an uprising among Mongols at Astrakhan recalled
him. Though the season was winter, and the snow was deep on the
country, he marched very swiftly on Astrakhan, stormed the city and
destroyed it. He robbed and ruined Sarai, and then, advancing by the
way of Derbend and Azerbaidjan, returned to Samarkand, his own capital.
These blows were so crushing and dreadful that the Golden Horde never
recovered. Many Russians thought that the end of Mongol rule was before
them. But the end was not yet, as was evident soon after. The first to
experience this bitter truth was Vitold, who had won against Yagello
and was now the haughty ruler of Lithuania and Western Russia.
Tamerlane gave the Golden Horde to a son of Urus Khan, the former rival
of Tohtamish, but Edigai, who had been one of Tamerlane’s generals,
assumed Mamai’s rôle,—the creation of Khans and ruling through them. He
set up now Timur Kutlui instead of the man whom Tamerlane had
appointed.
Meanwhile Tohtamish, who had ruled the Golden Horde for twenty years,
had taken refuge with Vitold. Through Tohtamish, Tamerlane’s fallen
rival, Vitold planned to control the Golden Horde, and in that way win
Moscow. The first step was to capture Sarai for his protege. Envoys
came at this juncture from Kutlui with the message: “Surrender
Tohtamish, my enemy! Tohtamish, once a great prince, but now a vile
deserter. Such is the fickleness of fortune.” Vitold refused, adding:
“I myself will march on Kutlui.” Hearing of this resolution, Yedviga,
Queen of Poland, warned Vitold, stating that through her power of
prophecy she foresaw that great misfortune would overtake him. But he
would not heed her warning.
The expedition undertaken by Vitold was made a holy struggle. Boniface
IX, through a bull to the clergy of Lithuania and Poland, ordained a
crusade against the infidel and gave indulgence to all who took part in
it. Vitold assembled a very strong army. With him were at least fifty
princes of Lithuania and Southern Russia. A number of Polish magnates
joined also. Tohtamish went with a considerable contingent of Mongols.
Even the German Order sent perhaps five hundred iron-clad warriors.
In July, 1399, Vitold set out on his expedition. The fame of Kulikovo
roused him, it is said, beyond other considerations, and he hoped to
eclipse Dmitri’s fame by greater achievements. He crossed the Dnieper
near Kief and vanished in the steppes. Passing the Horol and the Sula,
he halted at Varskla. On the opposite bank appeared the Mongols led by
Kutlui, who, seeing that his enemy was superior in numbers, began to
negotiate. To win time was his object, for he was waiting for Edigai
with a second Mongol army.
“Why art thou marching on me when I have not touched thy possessions?”
asked he of Vitold. “The Lord has given me dominion over all. Pay me
tribute and be my son,” replied Vitold. The Khan promised tribute, but
did not like to put Vitold’s name and seal on his coinage; he asked
three days to think over that question. Thus he seemed to yield the
main point, though in reality he did not. Meanwhile he gave Vitold many
presents, and continually sent him questions, through envoys. When the
time had passed, Edigai arrived with his army, and begged that Vitold
come out to the opposite bank for an interview. “Valiant prince,” said
Edigai, “if Timur Kutlui wishes to be thy son, since he is younger than
thou, in thy turn be my son, since I am older than thou. Therefore pay
me tribute, and put my seal on thy money.”
Enraged by deceit and ridicule, Vitold commanded the army to leave its
camp, cross the river, and give battle at once. The prudent Spytko of
Melshtin tried to warn the Grand Prince, and advised peace in view of
Mongol preponderance, but his advice only roused wrath. A certain
Polish knight named Stchukovski said, with scorn: “If thou art sorry to
part with thy wealth and thy young wife, do not frighten those who are
ready to die on the field of battle.” “To-day I shall die with honor,
but thou wilt flee as a coward,” retorted Spytko. His words proved to
be true, for death met him soon, and Stchukovski was among the first of
the fugitives.
The battle began after midday on August 5, 1399. The Mongols raised
such a dust that no one could see them. Thus did they hide their
movements. They closely surrounded Vitold’s army, and even seized the
horses from many before they could mount. Artillery, then of recent
invention, could not be used in that battle with profit.
Notwithstanding these disadvantages, Vitold was able to force back and
confuse Edigai’s army. But Kutlui rushed to the Lithuanian rear with a
great force of cavalry, crushed all before him and triumphed. Tohtamish
was the first to flee, after him followed Vitold with his boyars, and
Sigismund, his brother.
The defeat was thorough and irreparable. Many princes were slain or
taken captive. Among the dead were Yagello’s two brothers, Andrei and
Dmitri, who had fought at Kulikovo. Seventy princes and boyars of
distinction were left on that battle-field. The whole camp, its
provisions, and all the cannon fell into the hands of the enemy. Kutlui
followed the fugitives, and ravaged the country as far as Lutsk. From
there he turned back to the steppe with as much wealth as he had means
of carrying, and driving as many captives as his men could manage.
Kutlui died soon after this expedition, and Edigai put Kutlui’s
brother, Shadibek, on the throne at Sarai. Seven years later Tohtamish
died in Siberia, slain, it is said, by the hand of Edigai, his dire
enemy.
Vitold’s defeat on the Vorskla was important for Eastern Europe. The
weakening of Lithuania, even for a time, was a godsend to Moscow. Not
without satisfaction might the people there look on this struggle
between the two deadly enemies of Russia. Tamerlane’s war with
Tohtamish and Vitold’s great conflict with Kutlui were vastly
important, and useful to Moscow and Russia. Many Smolensk people, weary
of Vitold, wished to recall their native prince, Yuri, son of
Sviatoslav, who was living in Ryazan with Oleg, his wife’s father, and
in 1400 Yuri turned to his father-in-law with these words: “My Smolensk
friends have sent men saying that many desire me. Wilt thou give aid
now to win my inheritance?” Oleg consented, and in 1401 he appeared at
Smolensk with an army, and declared to the people: “If ye refuse Yuri,
I will not stop till I capture Smolensk, and destroy it.” A schism rose
quickly. Some were for Vitold, and others were against him. Yuri’s
party was the stronger, and in August the Smolensk gates were opened to
him. This prince then gave rein to his passion, and marked his return
by killing Vitold’s chief partisans.
In the war which came later between Lithuania on one side and Smolensk
with Ryazan on the other, Vitold’s attempt to get possession of
Smolensk was a failure. Oleg now thought to regain from Lithuania
certain seizures, and sent his son, Rodoslav, to win the Bryansk
principality, but Vitold despatched an army under Simeon, son of
Olgerd, his skilful cousin, and Rodoslav met an overwhelming defeat.
Captured and put in prison, he lay there until ransomed, three years
later. This reverse killed Oleg, then an old man. Yuri’s position
changed straightway. Though Vitold laid siege to Smolensk without
taking it, and was forced to withdraw, he resolved to subdue the place.
In time many boyars, indignant at the cruelty of Yuri, grew friendly to
Vitold.
Yuri had no aid now from any power, and the city was divided. He went
to Moscow and begged Prince Vassili to defend him, as he promised
obedience to Moscow. Vassili did not refuse the request, but he made no
immediate promise, for he had no wish to raise arms against Vitold.
Meanwhile Vitold, during Yuri’s absence, appeared at Smolensk, and in
the summer of 1404 boyars surrendered the city. Vitold also was
terribly cruel, slaying, and driving out of Smolensk all his powerful
opponents, but as an adroit politician, he attracted many people by
privileges, and turned them from Yuri, who now went to Novgorod, where
they welcomed him, and gave him several towns to manage.
It was clear that Vitold had recovered from the Vorskla disaster, and
was aiming to seize Pskoff and Novgorod. In 1405 he attacked Pskoff,
took Koloje, slew many people, and captured large numbers. Novgorod, as
usual, was either late with assistance, or refused to coöperate. Pskoff
men turned then to Moscow, and Vassili, understanding at last the great
peril which threatened him from Vitold, broke peace with his
father-in-law, and sent men to war on Lithuania. In the course of three
years, 1406, 1407, and 1408, war between these two princes had an
annual renewal. Three times did Vassili and Vitold march against each
other with large forces, but each time they stopped before decisive
battle, and withdrew after a truce was made. It is evident that this
halting was caused in part by their mutual relations, in part by the
caution of each man in view of the other.
Their last meeting took place September, 1408, on the Ugra, which
served as a boundary between them. After they had been encamped face to
face on opposite banks of the river for several days, they made a peace
by which the boundaries of their lands remained as they were at that
time. Later on, Vitold made no serious move against Pskoff or even
Novgorod. By this war, therefore, Moscow restrained Vitold in Eastern
and Northern Russia. The war had other results also. Many noted
Lithuanians and Russians, from one and another cause, were dissatisfied
with Vitold, and went to join Moscow. Especially numerous were the men
from near southern districts of Chernigoff. Among them appeared in 1408
the brother of the Polish king, Prince Svidrigello, son of Olgerd.
Laying claim as he did to Lithuania, he had no wish to be subordinate
to Vitold. Vassili was willing to welcome such an exile, and gave
Svidrigello a number of towns to support him. Such liberality to a
stranger displeased Russian boyars, and later on they were raging when
Svidrigello, instead of defending Moscow against Edigai, fled meanly
with his numerous attendants, plundering the people as he traveled.
Strange was the fate of Yuri, the last Smolensk prince. He did not
remain long in Novgorod, and when the break came between Vassili and
Vitold he appeared in Moscow a second time, with Prince Simeon of
Vyazma. Vassili gave Yuri Torjok to support him. Now his unrestrained
temper brought the man to a crime of foul aspect. He flamed up with
passion for the wife of Prince Simeon. Meeting with strong resistance
on her part, he strove to use violence, and when she defended herself
with a keen weapon, he killed her. On that same day he killed her
husband also. No matter how rude was the period, or how much liberty
princes sometimes allowed themselves, such disregard of human and
Christian rules roused indignation and rage in all men. Either expelled
by Vassili, or rushing away from Torjok of his own will, Yuri fled to
the Horde, but finding no refuge there, or in any place, he wandered
some months, sick and weighed down in spirit, till he hid himself at
last with an abbot named Peter, in whose monastery his life ended
shortly afterward.
Disorder and murder in the Horde encouraged the Grand Prince of Moscow
to think of complete independence. He honored the Mongols with moderate
gifts, and, under pretext of national poverty, almost ceased from
paying tribute. He did not visit the Horde in the time of Kutlui, or
during Shadibek’s reign, which continued for eight years. In his slow
struggle with Vitold he had received from the Khan some small forces,
that was all. When Shadibek was dethroned, and Kutlui’s son, Bulat Bey,
was instated, Vassili not only did not visit this new Khan; he even
showed favor to some of his enemies, two of Tohtamish’s sons, of course
with the wish to keep up civil war and disorder among the Mongols.
This clear and well-defined policy was connected with a change of
advisers in Moscow. Former boyars, the counselors and comrades of
Dmitri, had either died, or lost influence. Vassili was surrounded by
younger assistants, men formed by impressions, and filled with the fame
of the battle of Kulikovo. They were ashamed to be subservient to the
Mongols; they despised Mongol influence. At the head of this party was
Vassili’s great favorite, Ivan, son of Feodor Koshka.
The Golden Horde Khans had no thought at this time of yielding their
hold upon Russia. They were at all times domineering, and in this they
were encouraged by the princes of Tver, Ryazan and Suzdal, who
continued to visit Sarai to obtain patents. Edigai had helped Vassili
against Vitold; he had even roused enmity between the two princes to
weaken them when peace was finally made, and now he resolved to show
that Moscow was really subject to the Horde. But both Russians and
Mongols remembered Kulikovo, and knew that war between Moscow and the
Horde would be most serious, hence at Sarai they resolved on a stealthy
and treacherous policy.
Edigai knew well that Moscow, keeping in mind the perfidy of Tohtamish,
had in Sarai well-paid agents, who would give information immediately
should any evident move be made toward invasion. He knew also that
hostility between Vassili and Vitold was still active, hence he sent an
envoy to Moscow, declaring that Bulat, the Khan, was making ready to
punish Vitold for the harm done to Moscow. He asked only that Vassili
should send a brother to Sarai, or a boyar of distinction, with
expressions of homage, to the Khan. Vassili, yielding to this demand,
sent a boyar named Yuri, who met Edigai marching rapidly on Moscow. The
boyar was seized and held strict captive, and no word of the
approaching army reached Vassili.
This happened late in the autumn of 1408. The Mongols were nearing
Moscow, when the Grand Prince learned what was happening. As it was too
late to make a stand against the invader, Vassili took his princess and
children to the North, beyond the Volga, for safety. The defense of the
capital he left to Vladimir, his father’s cousin, and to Andrei and
Peter, his brothers. To make the siege difficult, all houses outside
the walls were burned. December 1, the Mongol army was visible. Edigai,
seeing the success of his stratagem, robbed, burned, and plundered on
every side. Pereyaslavl, Rostoff, Dmitroff, Nizni and Gorodets were
taken. Mongols raced over Russia, like wolves during winter, and seized
all that they could reach, including people, whom they drove, leashed
like dogs, to their camping grounds. Panic terror was again master in
Russia. Thirty thousand Mongols were sent to hunt down the Grand
Prince, but they could not discover him.
Meanwhile the old hero of Kulikovo, Dmitri’s cousin, Vladimir, defended
Moscow. The walls were strong and well mounted with new and old
weapons. There were plenty of defenders; hunger alone could reduce the
capital. Edigai now sent to the Tver prince, Ivan, son of that Michael
who had fought so long against Moscow, and commanded him to come with
troops, cannon, and wall-breaking instruments. But this Tver prince
would not serve the enemy of Russia; he set out with an army, not over
numerous, and marched very slowly. He reached Klin, fell ill, as he
asserted, and returned home, being unable to go farther. Edigai
summoned Moscow to surrender, declaring that he was ready to stay
before the walls through the winter, or till the city received him. But
all at once from Bulat, the Khan, came a courier imploring Edigai’s
immediate presence. Bulat had barely avoided dethronement from a rival.
It was evident that few warriors had been left in Sarai, no force
sufficient to defend the place. Meanwhile the Mongols learned that
Vassili was marching from Kostroma with a large army.
At this juncture Edigai had the wit to win something. He announced that
for three thousand rubles he would raise the siege, and leave Moscow.
No one knew the situation, hence the money was delivered, and Edigai
hurried home to save Bulat from dethronement. An immense train of
captives and much booty followed after him. This raid had caused great
loss to Russia. From the Don to Bailozero, and Galitch beyond the
Volga, the country had been ravaged.
Edigai now sent a letter to Vassili, in which he recounted that
prince’s many sins against his sovereign: the Khan’s envoys had been
insulted, as well as his merchants. The prince had not visited the
Horde or sent his relatives or boyars. “In other days thou hadst men
well inclined to us. Listen not to youths, and thou wilt not be ruined
through haughtiness. When attacked by princes of Lithuania, or Russia,
thou art quick to ask aid of us, and give no rest till we send it. Thou
sayest that thy lands are exhausted, that thou canst get no tribute.
This is false. We have learned that from two ploughs thou receivest one
ruble; what dost thou do with that money? Live in the old way,
uninjured and faithful.”
But even after receiving this message Vassili was unwilling to give
tribute to the Mongols; and he was right in view of the turmoil and
trouble in Sarai. Only when Edigai had been hunted from the Horde and
the son of Tohtamish, Jelal ed din, the ally of Vitold, and the
protector of the Suzdal princes then fighting with Vassili, had taken
his place, did the Moscow prince decide at last on a visit to the
Mongols, taking with him rich gifts, and words of obedience. But during
his stay at Sarai Jelal ed din was dethroned, and murdered by Kerim
Berda, his own brother, who straightway declared himself an enemy of
Vitold, and friendly to Vassili.
Perhaps the new Khan was of those who had found asylum in Moscow, when
wandering and powerless. Still the formal relations of the principality
to the Horde were those of a tributary. Some time later Kerim Berda was
dethroned by a brother, and the dance of disorder continued.
One among many results of Vitold’s defeat at the Vorskla was to
strengthen the bonds between Lithuania and Poland. Weakened by that
defeat, Vitold had to lower his haughtiness, and seek aid from Yagello
against powerful neighbors, that is, Northeastern Russia, the Golden
Horde, and the German Order. In January, 1401, the two cousins met at
Vilna, and bound themselves to give mutual aid whenever needed. After
this meeting the princes and boyars of Lithuania and Western Russia
agreed to aid the Polish king. If Vitold died while Yagello was living,
Yagello was to be chosen as their Grand Prince. If Yagello died before
Vitold, the Poles were to choose no king without Vitold’s concurrence.
Thus was accomplished, though not very strictly, the union of Lithuania
with Poland, promised by Yagello at his crowning. Vitold acknowledged
himself to be only lifelong vicegerent. There was no mention of a
tribute, which had been demanded once by the late Queen Yedviga, who
affirmed that Lithuania and Russia were hers as a marriage gift from
Yagello. Owing to this union, Vitold now recovered completely from that
Vorskla disaster.
Those two cousins, Yagello and Vitold, were remarkable men. Yagello
gave away what he had for a show and a glitter. Vitold was willing to
give that which he must give for help to win, what for him was the one
prize, dominion; and when he had this dominion he snatched back that
which he had given to those who had helped him. Poland aided Vitold in
everything, with the intent of taking from him when the time came all
that he might win from others through Polish assistance, while he
wished to keep all that he gained, no matter how he acquired it. Vitold
renewed his incursive advance upon Eastern and Northern Russia, but the
first weighty blow was reserved for that active and dangerous neighbor,
that unsparing foe of Lithuania and Poland, the Teutonic Order.
The apparent cause for this collision was Jmud, which Vitold, when
preparing to struggle with Yagello so as to bring him to his side, had
given to the Knights of the Cross in return for their aid, and which
had remained pagan after Lithuania itself had been Catholicized through
Yagello by contract. The Germans introduced Christianity with fire and
sword into Jmud, entering that region by two sides, Livonia and Russia.
The people met their attackers with reprisals and uprisings, with
resistance of all kinds, and begged their prince, Vitold, to help them.
He meanwhile, through policy, avoided a break with the Order, and
sometimes even helped that same Order to crush his own people. But he
was waiting to choose the right moment to take back his inheritance.
At this juncture there rose a dispute between the Order and Yagello,
touching lands called Neumarch, or New March, which belonged to
Sigismund of Hungary. Later on Neumarch was mortgaged to the Order by
Sigismund, that Emperor famous for the evil of his friendship, and the
virtue of his enmity, renowned also for the burning of John Huss after
he had given him a safe-conduct, one of the most infamous acts recorded
in the history of any country. This land touched on Poland. Its
boundaries were disputed, and caused a Polish grievance. The Poles had
another and greater grievance: The Order had taken from them Pomerania
on the Baltic. There was hatred on both sides.
The Order felt confident of victory, and beyond any doubt would have
won it had Poland been alone in the conflict. From 1393 till 1407
Konrad von Jungingen, the Grand Master, a man who was pious and
peace-loving, repressed all hostile movements. But the Order grew weary
of peace, and when Konrad died his cousin, Ulrich, who was as warlike
as Konrad had been peace-loving, was chosen Grand Master and war was
inevitable. There were many causes for conflict, but the overshadowing
and great one was race ambition. The Order felt confident of victory,
and chose its moment for battle.
July 15, 1410, the forces of the Order engaged those led by Vitold and
Yagello at Tannenberg, and there the Order met a merciless defeat, from
which it never rose as a military body. But, though utterly vanquished,
the Order was able, with endurance and management, to save Eastern
Prussia to the Germans, and in Königsberg, the capital of that Prussia,
was crowned the first Prussian king, whose descendant is now the
Emperor of Germany.
Poland, before the crowning of Yagello, had been on the verge of
destruction from the Order, which counted the Poles as sure victims,
and included with them the Lithuanians. By the union of Polish,
Lithuanian, and Russian forces, German plans were baffled, and Poland,
after the victory at Tannenberg, rose high in European estimation. But
Yagello, through indecision, and because of Vitold’s plans, failed much
in settling with the Order. Instead of rushing straightway from the
field of victory to Marienberg, the stronghold of the Order, the Polish
king appeared there only on the tenth day.
Meanwhile, Heinrich von Plauen, Komtur of the Order, had led home the
remnant of the knightly army, and brought in provisions. He defended
Marienberg valiantly. The siege dragged on; disease struck the armies
of Yagello and Vitold. Help was marching to the Order from Germany and
Livonia. Sigismund, just chosen Emperor, threatened war openly. Vitold
abandoned the siege and left Marienberg, influenced, it was said, by
cunning hints that by helping Poland over much he would harm his own
power and position. He was followed by Prince Yanush of Mazovia, and
Zemovit, his brother.
At last Yagello raised the siege and marched away from the stronghold.
Many Prussian towns which had surrendered at first to Yagello returned
now to the Order. War lasted till the following year, and ended with
the treaty of Torun (Thorn), by which the Order retained almost all it
had held previous to the battle. Jmud went, however, to Vitold, and the
land of Dabryn to Yagello, but the gains were not great if compared
with what they might have been.
Close relations between Vitold’s lands and those of the Polish Crown
continued because of common danger from the Germans. The Order
recovered considerably under its new Master. It could fall back for
support upon Germany, where Sigismund befriended it. The greatest loss
for the Order was Jmud, which divided Livonia from Prussia, and thus
hindered contact between the two parts of the Order. Jmud prevented the
union of Germanized lands on the Baltic. But a greater gain to the
Poles was the act of Horodlo.
In October, 1413, Yagello, with Polish magnates, and Vitold, with
Lithuanian and Russian boyars, met at the Russian town, Horodlo. At
that meeting an agreement was made touching the lands under Vitold, and
the land ruled by Yagello. The agreement of 1401 concerning succession
was repeated. Diets which touched both political divisions were
assembled at Lublin or Parchov. To effect a more intimate union,
Russo-Lithuanian boyars received the same rights as Polish nobles. They
were associated with Polish families in heraldry. Thus the voevoda of
Vilna, Monivid, was associated with the Polish shield belonging to
Leliva. A Lithuanian prince or boyar received a shield which belonged
to a Polish stock. In addition, the rights of nobles in Poland, already
exceptional, were extended to nobles in Lithuania and Russia, but these
nobles were to be Catholic in every case. A number of great offices of
the Polish kind were created. None but Catholics, however, could hold
them. Thus Polish predominance in the upper circles of Russia was
established directly. All heathen parts of Lithuania had been
Catholicized by Yagello, but in Russia both princes and people were
Orthodox. Some Lithuanian princes were Catholic, and some were
Orthodox. But no man could enjoy those new rights, or hold a high
office, without becoming a Catholic.
Thus the significance of the Grand Prince of Lithuania and Russia, and
the Orthodox Church was diminished, for no prince or noble could hold
an office created at Horodlo, or enjoy the rights of a noble of the
Commonwealth, without being Catholic. In other words, two social
systems and two kinds of government were confronted at Horodlo,—the
Russo-Lithuanian on one side, and the Polish on the other. Vitold’s aim
in church matters was to rend the church union of Russia, to separate
the western provinces of Moscow. He wished that the metropolitan of all
Russia should be resident in Kief, where he himself was master, and
have jurisdiction in Moscow. In case that could not be effected, he
wanted that Western Russia should have its own metropolitan. Hence
during the fourteenth century, more than once there were two
metropolitans, one in Moscow, another in Kief, and sometimes a third in
Galitch. We have seen that Cyprian, at first metropolitan in the West,
outlived his Moscow opponents Mityai and Pimen, and united the whole
Church in Russia. Though he, like his predecessors, lived in Moscow,
still he preserved the friendship of Vitold and Yagello. He often
visited the West and remained for long periods; he consulted Yagello
and Vitold, and generally upheld the church unity of Russia, excepting
Galitch, over which he had also some influence. The last years of his
life were passed mainly near Moscow, where he translated several books,
and wrote others. He died September 16, 1406.
At that time there was actual collision between Vassili and Vitold; the
latter, determined to have a metropolitan in the lands under him,
proposed Theodosia. The Patriarch failed to accept this suggestion, and
in 1408 appointed Foti, a Greek born in the Morea, as Cyprian’s
successor. Vitold was very angry, and, in view of Western displeasure
with Foti, decided to have a second metropolitan. His choice fell on
Gregori Samblak, who was, as some declared, a nephew of Cyprian.
The Patriarch refused to confirm this division of Russia into two
parts. Not getting his consent, Vitold assembled a Synod in 1416, and,
through kindness and threats, secured the installation of Samblak. But
Samblak, being a zealous defender of Orthodox interests, remained only
three years in office. In 1419 he left Western Russia, and church unity
was reëstablished.
Meanwhile Edigai, expelled from the capital of the Golden Horde, chose
the Crimea as a new field of action. In 1416 he fell again upon Kief,
which he plundered, robbing churches and monasteries. His was the first
Crimean raid against Russia. Men said that the Knights of the Cross had
some share in this raid. The Order struggled twelve years with Vitold
after that terrible defeat at Tannenberg, and made peace only in 1422,
at Lake Malno.
About 1420 the land ruled by Vitold stretched from the Baltic to the
Euxine, and from the Western Būg to the Oká River, while his influence
went far beyond those limits. Vassili, Grand Prince of Moscow, when
dying, committed his young son and heir to Vitold’s protection, and
after Vassili’s death the princes of Tver and Ryazan were at least
morally dependent on Vitold. Pskoff and Novgorod felt his hand over
them, and purchased peace with money. The Crimea Mongols, and those
near the Black Sea showed fear and respect before this strong, crafty
ruler.
But do what he might, he was controlled by Poland. His alliance with
Yagello made him and his cousin the first powers in Europe, but no
matter what Vitold accomplished, the whole profit of his action went
surely to Poland.
Yagello was not weighty as a ruler. The master mind of the Polish
Commonwealth of that day was Olesnitski, Archbishop of Cracow, and
Chancellor. In 1410 this man had been in the king’s suite at
Tannenberg, and had saved the life of Yagello, whom the Germans came
very near killing. From Tannenberg began Olesnitski’s great influence.
A man of high gifts, he was unbending in all that gave profit to his
religion and his country. Vitold was baffled in everything which was
not in favor of Polish interests as Olesnitski understood them.
Vitold, like his predecessors, accustomed to govern as he wished in his
own state, could not avoid looking with disquiet at the growing power
of Poland in Lithuania and Russia, and the continual decrease of the
royal authority in Poland. The nobility and clergy were absorbing all
the power in the country; the king was becoming a cipher. This was
owing in part to the weakness of Yagello, who gave away the immense
lands and wealth at his disposal without any return from them. In the
union the Poles saw their one opportunity. They looked on Russia and
Lithuania as fields in which to win vast wealth and influence. At this
point Vitold strove earnestly to stop the advance of Poland, by
becoming himself independent. The best means to this end, as he
thought, was to make Lithuania and Russia a kingdom.
So in 1429 he arranged a meeting of sovereigns at Lutsk. King Yagello
was there, with a great suite, and numerous prelates. Vassili of
Moscow, son and heir of the Grand Prince, was present, as were the
Ryazan and Tver princes. Among other rulers were the Khan of the
Crimea, the Teutonic Grand Master, the papal legate, and an ambassador
from Byzantium. The Emperor Sigismund forced the whole company to wait
sixteen days for him. Fifteen thousand people were invited; they filled
Lutsk, and all places near that city.
The leading questions were opened by Sigismund, and related to
Moldavia; the Hussite wars; the union of the Eastern and Western
Churches; a crusade against the Turks by all Christians. The great
question, however, was the crown of Lithuania and Russia for Vitold.
Yagello made no opposition, but would not act unless aided by the
magnates of Poland. When the question was raised for discussion,
Olesnitski made a fiery speech in opposition. The magnates were roused
to the utmost, and, stopping every Polish discussion, they left Lutsk
in a body. Yagello left also, without taking leave, even of Vitold.
Sigismund followed soon after, agreeing, however, with Vitold on a new
meeting at which the crown would be given him most surely. The other
guests withdrew now, but all were invited to Vitold’s coronation in
Vilna.
The Lutsk meeting lasted seven weeks, and caused an immense outlay of
money. Every day one hundred barrels of mead were drunk, besides
Muscat, Malvasia and wines of various other sorts. One hundred beeves,
as many sheep and wild boars, nine wild bulls, and fourteen elks were
consumed daily, besides all kinds of game known in those regions.
Opposition only roused Vitold, and he determined to conquer by removing
every obstacle. He set about winning Polish partisans; but he could not
influence Olesnitski, or bend him in any way. The Pope, Martin V, who
took the side of the Poles, would not consent to the crowning, and
advised them to abandon the project. Yagello offered to abdicate in
favor of Vitold, but the latter refused to be caught in that manner.
Olesnitski would not listen to the statement that the kingly dignity of
Vitold would not affect the desired union of the countries. Vitold’s
main support was Sigismund, who wished above all things to weaken
Poland. He was supported also by the Northern Russian nobles, who
strenuously opposed union with the Poles. The existence of this
Orthodox party, schismatic, according to Catholic understanding,
induced the Pope to take the Polish side firmly.
In September, 1430, the assembly met at Vilna. It was nearly the same
as at Lutsk, with about the same numbers, and of equal brilliancy.
Yagello, Olesnitski, and the Polish magnates were present. Those Poles
who had been won over by Vitold did not oppose him, but Olesnitski was
as unbending as ever. Nevertheless all preparations were made for the
crowning. The assembly was only waiting for the embassy from Sigismund,
which was bringing the crown and the regalia. But the embassy came not.
Sigismund had sent a confidant with letters to Vilna and the ceremonial
of the crowning. This man was captured on the high-road to Vilna, by
the Poles, who seized all his papers and cut the crown in two. They
placed armed guards at every point, and stopped Sigismund’s embassy.
Unable to advance, the embassy halted at Brandenbury, and waited for
orders. The Vilna assembly, after long waiting, dissolved by degrees,
and departed.
Grievous disappointment destroyed Vitold’s health; a carbuncle appeared
between his shoulders. Leaving Vilna for Troki, he grew faint on the
way, and dropped to the ground from his saddle. He died two weeks
later, October 27, 1430, in his eighty-first year.
After Gedimin and Olgerd, Vitold was the third and last of those
princes who united Lithuania and Western Russia. No matter how Vitold
toiled to reach the goal of his ambition, the result of his toil went
to Poland. While working against union with that country, and building
a state to oppose it, he was really preparing for that union, since the
Polish kingdom was the only power served by his activity. In founding a
state east of Poland, Vitold dispossessed the Russian princes west of
Moscow, and by doing this cleared a great field for the Polish
Commonwealth. He had not power sufficient to build a new, independent,
political structure. He made agreements with Poland intending to break
them, as he had broken those which he made with the Germans. But Vitold
passed away without building his kingdom, and his agreements remained
clearly written on paper. The Poles clung to those documents, and
exhibited them as title-deeds to dominion, the Magna Charta of their
Commonwealth.
One inheritance, however, was left to their ruin: the deposed and
reduced princes of Western Russia, and the boyars who formed somewhat
later that body of magnates which took to itself the political power of
the Commonwealth, and reduced the crown to a plaything. And since there
was no central force in the Commonwealth, that Commonwealth went to
pieces. The struggle which for centuries had raged among Russian
princes was repeated in Poland on a far broader scale, and with more
destructive intensity.
We must now go back to events which took place in Russia during the
last six years of Vitold’s life. Though the Mongol yoke weighed yet on
Russia, and liberation seemed still at a distance, the weight of the
yoke was not what it had been, even in the reign of Dmitri. In general,
people began to look on the Mongols as neighbors whom they might, with
gifts and flattery, keep in peace, and make endurable. They were no
longer masters in the old sense. Their power had reached its greatest
height and was declining. Wars and disturbances were unceasing among
the various Horde fragments, hence a Moscow prince might favor one
fragment in opposition to others, and thus in time bring it over to his
side.
In 1424 the Grand Prince, Vassili, fell ill, and his illness continued
half a year, till death came to him. In days preceding his illness, he
had turned his main effort to securing the inheritance to his eldest
son, also Vassili by name. He took every measure of prudence, and
expressed so much confidence in Vitold, his father-in-law, that he made
him chief guardian of this young Vassili. Vitold then took an oath to
see that his grandson inherited the throne of his father. Of course the
brothers of the Grand Prince knew of this oath. But Vassili did not
think that active steps would be taken against his son by that son’s
uncles. In his illness he turned to his brothers, Andrei and Yuri, and
begged them not to oppose the will by which he had made his son Grand
Prince. In commending Vassili to Vitold, one of the most powerful
sovereigns of Europe, he must have intended to threaten his brothers.
Vassili was the only son of the Grand Prince; the other sons born to
him had died earlier, so this was a favorable condition for inheritance
by the eldest from his father. But the Grand Prince himself had
brothers: Yuri, Andrei, Peter, and Constantine. The eldest would not
recognize his nephew as senior. In his will, therefore, Vassili gave
the guardianship of his heir to Vitold, and to his own brothers,
Andrei, Peter and Constantine, taking no note of Yuri.
Vassili was only ten years of age when his father died. The
metropolitan invited Yuri, then in Zvenigorod, to be present in Moscow
at the installation of his nephew. But Yuri hastened off to his own
land beyond the Volga to prepare for hostile action. Vassili’s mother,
his uncles, and some boyars sent the metropolitan to bring Yuri to
peaceful methods. Yuri would not listen and, angered by his refusal,
the metropolitan left Galitch without blessing that city. Straightway
the plague appeared in Galitch, as the chronicler informs us. The
prince hurried after the prelate, and with difficulty brought him back
to give his blessing. Yuri now sent two envoys to Moscow with this
message: “I will not seek the principality with violence. Let the Khan
say who shall have it.”
But no one visited Sarai, and quiet reigned in Russia for a season.
Yuri’s yielding was caused not so much by the metropolitan, as by fear
of Vitold, who had declared that he would permit no man to offend his
grandson. Meanwhile the plague spread through Russia and brought
devastation to Moscow, Tver, and Novgorod. “Suddenly and without
warning the victim would feel a sharp pain in the chest, or between the
shoulders as though struck with a dagger; blood would flow from the
mouth, intense fever would be followed by intense cold; the entrails
were as though consumed by fire; tumors appeared under the arms, on the
neck or hips. Death was inevitable and swift, but terrible.” The
scourge continued for more than two years, and caused the death of many
members of the ruling house, among others four sons of Vladimir the
Brave, as well as Andrei and Peter, two uncles of Vassili.
Vitold died, as we remember, in 1430, and Svidrigello, son of Olgerd,
reigned in his stead. Svidrigello was a friend of Vassili’s uncle,
Yuri, and Yuri laid claim at once to the Grand Principality. The
following year, after various councils and discussions, Vassili set out
for the Horde; then Yuri went also to get the Khan’s judgment.
The rule of the Horde over Russia had weakened greatly, but it was
strengthened anew by this quarrel. Both sides had friends at Sarai.
Mindulat, an official who had looked after tribute in Moscow, was
Vassili’s chief ally among the Mongols. On Yuri’s side was the Murza
Tiginya, who took Yuri to the Crimea, boasting that he would make him
Grand Prince in Russia. Among boyars attending Vassili, the first place
was held by Ivan Vsevolojski, a man who had served Vassili’s father and
grandfather. This shrewd boyar took advantage of Tiginya’s absence, and
his boasting. “Tiginya says,” declared Ivan to the Mongols, “that the
Khan yields to him in all things, that every Mongol magnate is his
servant. If this be true, Yuri will succeed, for to him Tiginya has
promised the Grand Principality.” Made indignant by these biting
speeches, which were repeated to him, the Khan, Ulu Mohammed, promised
to put Tiginya to death if he even tried to help Yuri. Then he began to
show favor to Vassili. Of course gifts played a very large part in the
question.
When Tiginya returned in the spring of 1432, and heard of the Khan’s
threats, he dared not assist Yuri. The Khan appointed a day to decide
the question. The Horde magnates and both princes were present. Vassili
rested his claim on inheritance from his father and grandfather; Yuri
on ancient custom, as proven by chronicles, and on the will of his
father Dmitri. Then Vsevolojski stepped forth and began speaking: “O
free Tsar, my sovereign,” said he, “grant a word to me, the servant of
Vassili of Moscow, who seeks the Grand Principality by thy gift and
patent. Prince Yuri seeks the same through the dead letter of ancient
custom, and not, O free Sovereign, by thy document, through which our
recent sovereign gave the Grand Principality to his son now reigning in
Moscow by thy will, as thou, our lord, knowest.”
This speech pleased the Khan, who, well disposed toward Vassili,
adjudged him the patent, and proposed that he mount a horse which Yuri
was to lead by the bridle. But Vassili had no wish to humiliate his
uncle.
As there was a war between Ulu Mohammed and Kutchuk Mohammed, the Khan,
fearing the treason of the murza Tiginya, granted at his request an
enlargement of Yuri’s domain by giving him Dmitroff, which had belonged
to Peter, his brother, but afterward Vassili took this town.
A Horde envoy, named Mansur, returned with Vassili to Moscow, and
enthroned him, that is, was present at the ceremony which took place in
the Assumption Cathedral. This is the first account of the coronation
of a Grand Prince in Moscow.
By confirming direct heirship from father to eldest son, the Khan aided
greatly in assuring single rule in Moscow, and prepared for the
downfall of Mongol supremacy. But a consistent policy at the Horde was
at that time impossible, for each Khan had to fight for his office. A
new uprising occurred soon, and this gave Yuri, the uncle, a chance to
win the Grand Principality, without reference to the previous Khan’s
decision.
Yuri’s chief inciter in this struggle was that same Vsevolojski, who
had previously secured triumph to Vassili. This boyar had not toiled
without reason. He had received Vassili’s promise to marry his
daughter; such a thing being usual in those days. Princes often married
daughters of boyars, and gave their own daughters in marriage to
boyars. Vsevolojski was of the Smolensk princely house, and his eldest
daughter had married a son of Vladimir the Brave. But Vassili’s mother
was opposed to this marriage, and brought about his betrothal to Maria,
the granddaughter of Vladimir. Vsevolojski was mortally offended, and
passed over, or to use the phrase of the period, “went away to take
service” with Yuri, and rouse him to seek the headship of Russia.
While Yuri was preparing to move on his nephew, there was a collision
in Moscow, which hastened and embittered the beginning of action.
Yuri’s sons, Vassili Kosói and Dmitri Shemyaká, were at a wedding in
the palace of the Grand Prince. Vassili Kosói was wearing a girdle of
gold set with jewels. All at once an old Moscow boyar noted the girdle,
and told its whole history to Sophia, the mother of the Grand Prince.
The girdle had been received by Dmitri of the Don from the Suzdal
prince as a gift with his daughter Yevdokia, but at the time of the
wedding Velyaminoff, commander of Moscow, put in the place of this
girdle another of less value, and gave this, the real one, to Nikolai,
his own son, who was married to another daughter of that same Dmitri,
the Suzdal prince. This Nikolai, who later on fell at Kulikovo, gave
the girdle as a gift to his daughter when she married Vsevolojski, and
Vsevolojski gave it with his daughter to Prince Andrei, son of
Vladimir. After Andrei’s death, his daughter was betrothed to Vassili
Kosói, who received this same precious girdle with his bride.
On learning these details Sophia commanded to strip the famed girdle
from Kosói. It is difficult to credit the chronicler that she would
insult a guest so rudely, remembering the length of time since the
first substitution had taken place. It is likely that there were other
reasons of enmity, and the girdle, if the story is true, was only a
pretext. In every case Kosói and his brother left the feast, burning
with anger and fully determined to make Vassili and his mother pay
dearly for the insult.
The Grand Prince, attacked unexpectedly by Yuri, could not collect
warriors in sufficient number; he was defeated in battle, and captured.
Yuri took Moscow, but in favor of the captive now appeared Yuri’s famed
boyar and counselor, Morozoff, who was either bribed by friends of
Vassili, or provoked by the triumph of Vsevolojski. He persuaded Yuri
to give Vassili the town of Kolomna, as a portion, but barely had
Vassili arrived there, when Moscow boyars and nobles rallied round him,
and refused to serve Yuri. Thus became evident the devotion of men to
that mode of inheritance which secured the possession of rights, lands
and property in permanence. Princes from smaller places, on coming to
Moscow, brought with them attendants and boyars, who drove out the old
servitors. This new turn enraged Yuri’s sons greatly, so they slew
Morozoff with their own hands, and escaped from Moscow. Then Yuri,
being almost abandoned, retired straightway to Galitch, and Vassili
came back to Moscow.
By a new treaty between Yuri and his nephew, Yuri recognized the
seniority of the nephew. Vsevolojski, the old boyar, paid dearly for
his treason. He was seized and blinded at command of Vassili, and his
lands were confiscated. As Kosói and Shemyaká had not joined in the
treaty, and had continued their warfare, Yuri himself broke that same
treaty soon after it was made. With his sons he drove out Vassili, and
in 1434 took the throne a second time, but that same year he died.
Kosói, his eldest son, tried to succeed him, but Kosói’s brothers,
Dmitri Shemyaká and Dmitri Krasni, refused to accept him as Grand
Prince, preferring their cousin, Vassili. Kosói, however, did not
abandon his claim, and continued the struggle.
In this conflict a great part was taken by the warlike and riotous
people of Vyatka, a Novgorod colony bordering on Galitch. The princes
of Galitch had completed their regiments with the wild Vyatka warriors,
and these added immensely to the fierceness of the struggle. After
ruinous attacks on northern districts Kosói met the Grand Prince at
Sokrotin, in Rostoff regions. But there he saw the superiority of his
enemy and, seeking advantage by perfidy, concluded a truce till the
following morning. Vassili, relying on this truce, sent his men for
provisions. Kosói then attacked him, but Vassili did not lose his head;
he sent messengers quickly to all sides to collect his forces. He
seized a trumpet himself, and sounded it. His men rushed in, and won a
complete victory. Kosói was taken prisoner, and led to Moscow (1436).
Kosói’s Vyatka warriors committed a desperate deed: The Grand Prince’s
lieutenant in Pereyaslavl, Prince Bryuhati, was encamped near the
junction of the Kotorosl and the Volga. Some tens of those Vyatka men
sailed up in the night, and at daybreak, in a fog, crept to Bryuhati’s
tent, seized him with his princess, and rushed to the boats with them.
An alarm was raised quickly, but the robbers flourished axes over the
prisoners, stopped pursuit, and reached the other bank of the river.
From there they bargained, and got four hundred rubles as ransom. Then,
keeping both captives and money, they hurried off to Vyatka. For such
perfidy Kosói suffered heavily. Vassili had his eyes put out. This
cruelty called for a similar deed in retaliation, which later on was
committed.