179. =Porzana jamaicensis= _Cass._ LITTLE BLACK RAIL.—One taken April

29, 1879.

180. =Gallinula galeata= _Bonap._ FLORIDA GALLINULE.—Common during the

breeding season in all marshes where reeds and bushes grow, but

especially so where the magnificent _Nymphæa odorata_ (Water-Lily)

opens its fragrant flowers, and where _Nuphar advena_ (Yellow Pond

Lily) and another beautiful aquatic, _Nelumbium luteum_ (Water

Chinquepin), are found; over the broad leaves of which plants the

little Florida Gallinule runs with exceeding quickness, searching for

water insects and other food.

181. =Fulica americana= _Gmel._ AMERICAN COOT; MUD HEN.—Decidedly more

numerous than the preceding. Especially common in the large prairie

swamps.

182. =Cygnus buccinator= _Rich._ TRUMPETER SWAN.—Every winter there

are large numbers on Galveston Bay and on the Gulf of Mexico near the

coast.

183. =Cygnus americanus= _Sharp._ AMERICAN or WHISTLING

SWAN.—Sometimes these birds winter abundantly on Galveston Bay.

184. =Anser hyperboreus= _Pall._ SNOW GOOSE; WHITE BRANT.—Exceedingly

abundant on Galveston Bay, also on the rivers and bayous near the Gulf

Coast in winter.

185. =Anser albifrons gambeli= _Coues_. AMERICAN WHITE-FRONTED

GOOSE.—This is the first Goose to arrive from the north in autumn, but

they all migrate farther south.

186. =Bernicla canadensis= _Boie_. CANADA GOOSE.—Exceedingly abundant

during winter. Large flocks are to be observed on the wet prairies in

company with Cranes.

187. =Anas boscas= _Linn._ MALLARD.—Very common during migrations and

in winter.

188. =Anas obscura= _Gmel._ BLACK DUCK; DUSKY DUCK.—Common during the

breeding season. A pair of these Ducks are seen in almost every pond

among Herons, Roseate Spoonbills, Anhingas, Gallinules, and Blackbirds

(_Agelæus phœniceus_).

189. =Dafila acuta= _Bonap._ PINTAIL DUCK.—Common during migrations.

190. =Chaulelasmus streperus= _Gray._ GADWALL.—Exceedingly abundant

during winter.

191. =Mareca americana= _Steph._ AMERICAN WIDGEON.—Common during

migrations.

192. =Querquedula carolinensis= _Steph._ GREEN-WINGED TEAL.—Very

common in autumn and spring, rather rare in winter.

193. =Querquedula discors= _Steph._ BLUE-WINGED TEAL.—Very common

during migrations but all pass further south.

194. =Querquedula cyanoptera= _Cass._ CINNAMON TEAL.—Not common during

migrations; none remain to winter.

195. =Spatula clypeata= _Boie_. SHOVELLER; SPOON-BILL DUCK.—Abundant

in winter.

196. =Aix sponsa= _Boie_. WOOD DUCK; SUMMER DUCK.—Common during

migrations; some remain to breed.

197. =Fulix marila= _Bd._ SCAUP DUCK.—Common in winter on Galveston

Bay.

198. =Fulix affinis= _Bd._ LITTLE BLACK-HEAD.—Very common in winter.

199. =Aythya vallisneria= _Boie_. CANVAS-BACK.—Abundant in winter on

Galveston Bay and on all marshy districts near the Gulf Coast.

200. =Bucephala albeola= _Bd._ BUTTER-BALL; BUFFLE-HEAD.—Abundant in

winter near the coast.

201. =Erismatura rubida= _Bonap._ RUDDY DUCK.—Very common during

migrations; none remain to winter, but many breed.

202. =Pelecanus erythrorhynchus= _Gmel._ AMERICAN WHITE

PELICAN.—Common during winter, especially near the coast.

203. =Pelecanus fuscus= _Linn._ BROWN PELICAN.—Common during the

breeding season on all the rivers, creeks, and bayous near the coast.

204. =Plotus anhinga= _Linn._ AMERICAN ANHINGA; SNAKE-BIRD; “WATER

TURKEY.”—Breeds in all marshy localities and is very common.

205. =Larus atricilla= _Linn._ LAUGHING GULL.—Abundant near the Gulf

Coast; breeds on the small sand islands in Galveston Bay.

206. =Sterna anglica= _Montag._ GULL-BILLED TERN.—Breeds abundantly on

the islands of Galveston Bay.

207. =Sterna regia= _Gambel._ ROYAL TERN.—Breeds in considerable

numbers on the islands of Galveston Bay.

208. =Sterna cantiaca acuflavida= _Ridgw._ CABOT’S TERN, and—

209. =Sterna forsteri= _Nutt._ FORSTER’S TERN.—These and a few other

Terns breed in abundance on the islands near the coast, especially on

the sand-bars of Galveston Bay, where they lay their eggs on the bare

sand. It was impossible for me to distinguish the eggs, as the birds

all leave the nests as soon as they are approached.

NOTES ON SOME BIRDS COLLECTED BY CAPT. CHARLES BENDIRE, AT FORT WALLA

WALLA, WASHINGTON TERRITORY.

BY WILLIAM BREWSTER.

The following paper is based on a collection of about two hundred and

fifty birds obtained in the immediate vicinity of Fort Walla Walla

during the autumn and winter of 1881–82, and submitted to me for

determination by Capt. Bendire, who has kindly consented to my

publishing any notes respecting them, that seem of sufficient interest.

As an exponent of the workings of geographical variation in species

easily modified by their surroundings, this material is especially

instructive. The region represented apparently constitutes a sort of

neutral ground between the Pacific and Middle Provinces and naturally

its fauna is a mixed one. Setting aside species not subject to

geographical modification, and migrants from the north which have only

an indirect bearing on the general question, we find the collection

divisible into three classes: (1) Forms identical with or most nearly

like Pacific coast types; (2) Forms about intermediate between

representatives inhabiting the Pacific and Middle Provinces; (3) Forms

to a certain extent intermediate between Pacific and Middle Province

representatives, but differing from both in certain original

characteristics. The locality seems to be nearly lacking in typical

representatives of the Middle Province; and its fauna, on the whole,

must be regarded as closely related to that of the coast region.

The third class, although least numerous, includes many of the most

interesting birds. The majority of these are resident forms, a fact

which sufficiently explains many of their peculiarities, for it is well

known that sedentary species are, of all others, the most subject to

local variation.

But while the philosophic bearing of this material is not doubtful,

there are certain systematic difficulties in the way of its satisfactory

presentation. I refer to the _naming_ of these intermediate forms. The

practice has been to use the name of the race to which the bird seems

most nearly related, and this I have been forced to adopt in default of

a better way. But the method obviously fails to meet the requirements of

such cases, while to a certain extent it is unscientific and inaccurate.

The evil, however, is not likely to be remedied, for it is difficult to

conceive of a system of nomenclature that would adequately designate the

numberless intermediate and local types.

In the present connection I would gratefully mention the assistance

received from my friend, Mr. Ridgway, who, during my study of the

collection, has given me every facility for examining the matchless

series in the National Museum, and to whom I am further indebted for

many valuable suggestions. My obligations to Capt. Bendire are greater

than I can adequately express, for, in addition to other kind

attentions, he has generously presented me with many valuable specimens

included among those about to be discussed.

List of Species and Varieties represented in the Collection.

1. _Turdus migratorius._[102]

2. _Turdus migratorius propinquus._

3. _Sialia arctica._

4. _Myiadestes townsendi._

5. _Regulus satrapa olivaceus._

6. _Parus atricapillus occidentalis._

7. _Telmatodytes palustris paludicola._

8. _Anthus ludovicianus._

9. _Lanius borealis._

10. _Ampelis garrulus._

11. _Ampelis cedrorum._

12. _Hesperophona vespertina._

13. _Chrysomitris tristis._

14. _Passerculus sandvicensis alaudinus._

15. _Zonotrichia gambeli intermedia._

16. _Spizella monticola ochracea._[103]

17. _Junco oregonus._

18. _Melospiza fasciata guttata._

19. _Pipilo maculatus megalonyx._[104]

20. _Agelæus phœniceus._

21. _Sturnella neglecta._

22. _Scolecophagus cyanocephalus._

23. _Corvus americanus._[105]

24. _Pica rustica hudsonica._

25. _Cyanocitta stelleri annectens._

26. _Eremophila alpestris._[106]

27. _Picus pubescens gairdneri._

28. _Melanerpes torquatus._

29. _Colaptes auratus hybridus._[107]

30. _Colaptes auratus mexicanus._

31. _Ceryle alcyon._

32. _Asio americanus._

33. _Asio accipitrinus._

34. _Scops asio kennicotti._[108]

35. _Bubo virginianus subarcticus._[109]

36. _Bubo virginianus saturatus._

37. _Nyctea scandiaca._

38. _Falco columbarius suckleyi._

39. _Falco richardsoni._

40. _Falco sparverius._

41. _Accipiter fuscus._

42. _Astur atricapillus._

43. _Astur atricapillus_ var. ——?[110]

44. _Buteo borealis calurus._

45. _Buteo swainsoni._

46. _Archibuteo lagopus sancti-johannis._

47. _Archibuteo ferrugineus._

48. _Zenaidura carolinensis._

49. _Bonasa umbella sabinii._

50. _Pediœcetes phasianellus columbianus._

51. _Charadrius dominicus._

SPECIES AND VARIETIES CALLING FOR SPECIAL CONSIDERATION.

6. =Parus atricapillus occidentalis= (_Baird_) _Coues_. OREGON

CHICKADEE.—A series of six specimens furnishes satisfactory

proof—which I believe has been heretofore wanting—that _P.

occidentalis_ is simply a dark, geographical race of _P.

atricapillus_. One example is absolutely typical of _occidentalis_,

while the others grade evenly into a form that is essentially

undistinguishable from _atricapillus_. Indeed the lightest colored

specimen is so nearly like some Massachusetts birds taken at the same

season that I have been unable, after a most careful comparison, to

detect the slightest difference in either color or markings: the wing

of the Walla Walla skin, however, is slightly shorter. There are no

apparent approaches in this series to _P. septentrionalis_.

16. =Spizella monticola ochracea= var. nov. WESTERN TREE SPARROW.—Ch.

Subsp. ♂ ♀ Similis _S. monticolæ_, sed colore suprà dilutiore; strigis

dorsalibus rarioribus, angustioribus et magis acutè in tergo

pallidiore depictis; lateribus gulâque magis ochraceis; vertice, in

auctumnalibus quidem avibus, sæpissimè magis cinereo.

♂ (Fort Walla Walla, Washington Territory, Nov. 8, 1881. Capt.

Bendire.) Back and rump pale sandy-brown or brownish-ochraceous, the

back with sharply defined black streaks which, excepting on the

scapulars, have no chestnut bordering; crown invaded centrally, from

the nape, by a broad space of pale ash which tinges most of the

feathers to their bases and confines the usual chestnut to a small

area on the forehead and two narrow, lateral stripes; lores and sides

of head pale fulvous; entire under parts washed with warm ochraceous,

deepest on the sides and abdomen, palest on the throat where it only

partially conceals the ashy beneath. Otherwise similar to _S.

monticola_.

_Dimensions._ Wing, 2.94; tail, 2.73; culmen, .43.

_Habitat._ Western North America, east to Dakota, north to Arctic

Ocean: Alaska?

The specimen above described differs widely from its nearest

approaches among my eastern examples. The ground-color of the back is

decidedly paler, bringing out the dark streaks in sharper contrast,

which is heightened by the absence of their usual chestnut edging; the

ash of the throat and sides of the head is much fainter, and in many

places replaced by brownish-fulvous; the under parts, especially the

sides and abdomen, are more strongly ochraceous; and the broad, ashy

crown-patch gives the head a very different appearance.

Upon testing these characters by comparison with the extensive

material in the National Museum, I find the different ground-color and

markings of the back to be constant in western birds, while the

ochraceous tint of the throat and sides of the head, although most

conspicuous in fall and winter specimens, is also a good distinction;

the ashy hood is apparently confined to autumnal birds, and with these

is variable in extent, as well as sometimes wanting; but as it _never_

occurs in eastern examples it is not wholly lacking in diagnostic

value.

A comparison of measurements taken from a large number of specimens of

both races shows little average difference in size, although the

western birds usually have smaller and narrower bills.

18. =Melospiza fasciata guttata= (_Nutt._) _Ridgw._ RUSTY SONG

SPARROW.—The thirteen Song Sparrows sent me from Fort Walla Walla

represent a form very nearly intermediate between _fallax_ and

_guttata_. Most of these specimens are decidedly browner above and

more heavily streaked beneath than true _fallax_; but on the other

hand none of them are as dark as typical _guttata_, although several

closely approach that form. One of the lighter examples is even grayer

than a Utah skin, and, taken by itself would necessarily be referable

to _fallax_. But the series as a whole may perhaps best be referred to

_guttata_.

25. =Cyanocitta stelleri annectens= (_Baird_) _Ridgw._ BLACK-HEADED

JAY.—An interesting series of Jays collected by Capt. Bendire includes

five typical representatives of _annectens_, two nearly typical

_stelleri_ and four birds about intermediate between these forms. The

differential characteristics of the three styles may be briefly given

as follows: The first-named has a well-defined and conspicuous patch

of white over the eye; the second entirely lacks this marking; the

third has it merely indicated by a narrow gray line. In all, the crest

is glossy black; the rest of the head, with the breast anteriorly,

plumbeous-black; the back plumbeous-brown; and the throat streaked

with bluish-white. All have the head above more or less streaked with

blue, but the shade and extent of this marking bear no apparent

relation to the presence or absence of the white patch over the eyes.

Thus examples of each style have the forehead and crown, to a point

half an inch behind the eye, thickly marked with blue or bluish-white,

while with all there is a more or less complete gradation from this

pattern to one in which a few pale streaks are confined to the

forehead. Similarly, the greater wing-coverts are distinctly barred

with black, faintly crossed with fine dark lines, or entirely

immaculate, without regard to the character of the features already

mentioned.

The above evidence clearly goes to show that _annectens_ grades

directly into _stelleri_; but it does not necessarily preclude the

recognition of the former as a well-defined geographical race, for the

locality under consideration abounds in similarly intermediate forms.

33. =Asio accipitrinus= (_Pall._) _Newton_. SHORT-EARED OWL.—A female,

taken Oct 7, has the ground-color of the plumage, both above and

beneath, rich, almost rusty, ochraceous; the markings, also, are

unusually dark and broad. Three males represent the other extreme,

their coloring, especially beneath, being remarkably pale and almost

free from any ochraceous tinge.

36. =Bubo virginianus saturatus=[111] _Ridgw._ DUSKY HORNED

OWL.—During the autumn of 1881 Great Horned Owls were unusually

abundant about Fort Walla Walla, and Capt. Bendire secured no less

than fourteen specimens, of which twelve are now before me. In a

general way these are referable as follows: eight to _saturatus_, two

to _subarcticus_, and two to a form apparently about intermediate

between these races. Five of the representatives of _saturatus_ are

typical, while the remaining three grade into the intermediate form

which, in turn, approaches one of the light specimens referred to

_subarcticus_. The latter example is not typical, but its companion

differs from an Arizona skin only in having slightly darker dorsal

markings and a little stronger rufous cast about the face and across

the breast, the color and markings elsewhere being essentially the

same.

The occurrence of these three forms together is not remarkable, for

two of them may reasonably be regarded as migrants from distant and

probably widely separated regions. The third possibly represents a

resident type, but on this point I have no direct evidence.

38. =Falco columbarius suckleyi?= _Ridgw._ BLACK MERLIN.—A beautiful

adult male Pigeon Hawk, taken at Fort Walla Walla Oct. 18, 1881,

presents such a puzzling combination of characters that, after

carefully comparing it with all the material available, I am still

at a loss for a definite opinion regarding its precise identity or

relationship. It most closely resembles highly colored, autumnal

adults of _F. columbarius_, but the under parts, excepting the

throat and a small central space on the abdomen, are rich

rusty-ochraceous—almost orange-chestnut on the breast and tibiæ,

while the usual cinereous above is intensified on the back to a

nearly pure plumbeous; the markings of the under parts, also, are

unusually coarse and numerous. In these respects it agrees with a

bird in the National Museum from Santa Clara, California, but it

differs from this specimen, as well as from every other adult that I

have seen, in having the outer webs of all the primaries, excepting

the first two, conspicuously marked with rounded spots of pale

ochraceous.

With _F. richardsoni_ it cannot be consistently associated, for the

adult, as well as the young of that species, always has six distinct

light bars on the tail, while the example under consideration

possesses but five. Moreover, the adult male of _richardsoni_ is very

much lighter colored than the adult of _columbarius_, whereas the

present bird is decidedly darker. The adult of _suckleyi_ is unknown,

but we should expect to find it, like the young, with sparse,

inconspicuous spotting on the lining of the wings. In the Walla Walla

bird these markings are as numerous and well-defined as in

_columbarius_.

Taking all these considerations into account, and bearing in mind the

unstable character of so many of the types furnished by this locality,

it seems most reasonable to assume that Capt. Bendire’s specimen

represents the adult plumage of a form which, although referable to

_suckleyi_, is more or less intermediate between that race and true

_columbarius_. But additional material must be forthcoming before the

question can be definitely settled.

39. =Falco richardsoni= _Ridgw._ RICHARDSON’S MERLIN.—Of this

well-marked species the collection contains two immature females,

dated respectively Oct. 13 and Oct. 21, 1881. Neither of these calls

for any special comment, but I take the present opportunity to

characterize the adult plumage of the male, which apparently has not

been previously described.[112]

_Falco richardsoni_, adult ♂ (author’s collection, Colorado Springs,

Colorado, C. E. Aiken). Above pale ashy-blue, most of the feathers of

the back, as well as the inner secondaries and many of the scapulars,

with fine, black shaft-lines; crown tinged with ochraceous (probably

wanting in the highest conditions of plumage), the black shaft-lines

here very numerous, each feather being conspicuously marked; forehead

and sides of head light ochraceous, the former with narrow black

streaks, the latter with broader brownish ones; a well-defined nuchal

collar of rusty-ochraceous with darker mottling; secondaries and

primary coverts concolor with the back, but with light bars on their

inner webs; primaries plumbeous-brown, margined with bluish-white and

marked conspicuously on both webs with the same color, the markings on

the inner webs being pure white and extending in transverse bars from

the shaft to the edge of the feather, those of the outer webs

ashy-white and in the form of conspicuous, rounded or quadrate spots;

tail crossed by five dark and six light bars, the last of the latter

terminal and pure white, the others more or less bordered by pale

ashy-blue; all of the dark bars clear black excepting the basal two,

which, on the central rectrices, are nearly uniform with the back, but

decidedly darker than the light ones with which they alternate; throat

pure white and immaculate; remainder of under parts pale ochraceous,

deepest on the tibiæ and crissum, where it is decidedly tinged with

rusty; feathers of the breast, abdomen, flanks and sides with median

stripes of clear reddish-brown, these stripes broadest on the flanks

(where they are sometimes actually transverse), narrowest across the

anterior part of the breast, and everywhere with fine but

inconspicuous dark shaft-lines; crissum entirely unmarked; under

tail-coverts and tibiæ with conspicuous shaft-lines of dark brown;

edges of wings pale ochraceous; under wing-coverts white, barred with

reddish-brown; all the markings of the primaries showing distinctly on

their under surfaces. _Dimensions._ Wing, 8.21; tail, 5.18; culmen

(from cere), .50.

Were further proof wanting to establish this Falcon’s specific

distinctness from _F. columbarius_, the difference in the adult

plumage of the two would settle the question. The adult male of _F.

richardsoni_ has the mantle almost as light as that of a Herring Gull,

while the conspicuous ashy-white spots on the outer webs of the

primaries and the six light tail bands constitute equally well-marked

characters. The specimen above described is essentially similar to

five examples in the National Museum.

42. =Astur atricapillus= (_Wils._) _Bonap._ AMERICAN GOSHAWK.—The

present collection includes four Goshawks, one an adult male, the

remaining three young, or at least immature, birds in brown plumage.

The adult is absolutely identical with Massachusetts specimens, and

must be considered typical _atricapillus_. Two of the young agree well

with Mr. Ridgway’s description of young _striatulus_,[113] but the

third does not have the markings either darker or more extensive than

do several of my New England examples, and the dorsal feathers have an

even broader light (_ochraceous_) edging; the under parts, also, are

strongly ochraceous, while the stripes on the flanks are neither

cordate nor transverse. The latter characters, however, are probably

worthless for they occur in a Tyngsboro (Mass.) bird.

Without going further into details I may sum up my conclusions as

follows: (1) That two of Capt. Bendire’s specimens (the adult and the

young bird just mentioned) are undistinguishable from typical

_atricapillus_; (2) That the other two examples (both young or

immature) differ from eastern birds in having broader, more linear

black markings beneath and a narrower light edging on the feathers

above, and are probably referable to a form more or less distinct from

_atricapillus_; (3) That true _atricapillus_ ranges westward at least

to Fort Walla Walla, Washington Territory; (4) That _striatulus_, as

at present defined, is a doubtfully tenable variety.

I am not at liberty to pursue the subject further, for I understand

that Mr. Nelson is about to propose a new Pacific coast race which

occurs, at least as a migrant, in the Western United States, and upon

the young of which Mr. Ridgway apparently based his description of

young striatulus.[114]

49. =Bonasa umbella sabinii= (_Dougl._) _Coues_. OREGON RUFFED

GROUSE.—The series of Ruffed Grouse embraces twelve specimens, all

from the immediate vicinity of Fort Walla Walla. These birds

apparently represent a dark, or more properly speaking, non-rufescent

phase of _sabinii_, corresponding to the gray phase of _umbella_, and

bearing the same relation to typical _sabinii_ that the Walla Walla

_Scops_ does to what has been considered typical _S. kennicotti_. This

peculiar plumage may be characterized as follows:

Gray phase; adult ♂. Above with the ground-color clear, dark ash,

nearly uniform and unmixed with reddish even on the wings and tail;

throat and breast tinged with reddish-yellow; remainder of under parts

white, occasionally with a trace of ochraceous; markings as in typical

_sabinii_.

Bulletin of the Nuttall Ornithological Club · 第 24 / 30 段