FIRST ARTICLE [I, Q. 118, Art. 1]

Whether the Sensitive Soul Is Transmitted with the Semen?

Objection 1: It would seem that the sensitive soul is not transmitted

with the semen, but created by God. For every perfect substance, not

composed of matter and form, that begins to exist, acquires existence

not by generation, but by creation: for nothing is generated save

from matter. But the sensitive soul is a perfect substance, otherwise

it could not move the body; and since it is the form of a body, it is

not composed of matter and form. Therefore it begins to exist not by

generation but by creation.

Obj. 2: Further, in living things the principle of generation is the

generating power; which, since it is one of the powers of the

vegetative soul, is of a lower order than the sensitive soul. Now

nothing acts beyond its species. Therefore the sensitive soul cannot

be caused by the animal's generating power.

Obj. 3: Further, the generator begets its like: so that the form of

the generator must be actually in the cause of generation. But

neither the sensitive soul itself nor any part thereof is actually in

the semen, for no part of the sensitive soul is elsewhere than in

some part of the body; while in the semen there is not even a

particle of the body, because there is not a particle of the body

which is not made from the semen and by the power thereof. Therefore

the sensitive soul is not produced through the semen.

Obj. 4: Further, if there be in the semen any principle productive of

the sensitive soul, this principle either remains after the animal is

begotten, or it does not remain. Now it cannot remain. For either it

would be identified with the sensitive soul of the begotten animal;

which is impossible, for thus there would be identity between

begetter and begotten, maker and made: or it would be distinct

therefrom; and again this is impossible, for it has been proved above

(Q. 76, A. 4) that in one animal there is but one formal principle,

which is the soul. If on the other hand the aforesaid principle does

not remain, this again seems to be impossible: for thus an agent

would act to its own destruction, which cannot be. Therefore the

sensitive soul cannot be generated from the semen.

_On the contrary,_ The power in the semen is to the animal seminally

generated, as the power in the elements of the world is to animals

produced from these elements--for instance by putrefaction. But in

the latter animals the soul is produced by the elemental power,

according to Gen. 1:20: "Let the waters bring forth the creeping

creatures having life." Therefore also the souls of animals seminally

generated are produced by the seminal power.

_I answer that,_ Some have held that the sensitive souls of animals

are created by God (Q. 65, A. 4). This opinion would hold if the

sensitive soul were subsistent, having being and operation of itself.

For thus, as having being and operation of itself, to be made would

needs be proper to it. And since a simple and subsistent thing cannot

be made except by creation, it would follow that the sensitive soul

would arrive at existence by creation.

But this principle is false--namely, that being and operation are

proper to the sensitive soul, as has been made clear above (Q. 75,

A. 3): for it would not cease to exist when the body perishes. Since,

therefore, it is not a subsistent form, its relation to existence is

that of the corporeal forms, to which existence does not belong as

proper to them, but which are said to exist forasmuch as the

subsistent composites exist through them.

Wherefore to be made is proper to composites. And since the generator

is like the generated, it follows of necessity that both the

sensitive soul, and all other like forms are naturally brought into

existence by certain corporeal agents that reduce the matter from

potentiality to act, through some corporeal power of which they are

possessed.

Now the more powerful an agent, the greater scope its action has: for

instance, the hotter a body, the greater the distance to which its

heat carries. Therefore bodies not endowed with life, which are the

lowest in the order of nature, generate their like, not through some

medium, but by themselves; thus fire by itself generates fire. But

living bodies, as being more powerful, act so as to generate their

like, both without and with a medium. Without a medium--in the work

of nutrition, in which flesh generates flesh: with a medium--in the

act of generation, because the semen of the animal or plant derives

a certain active force from the soul of the generator, just as the

instrument derives a certain motive power from the principal agent.

And as it matters not whether we say that something is moved by the

instrument or by the principal agent, so neither does it matter

whether we say that the soul of the generated is caused by the soul

of the generator, or by some seminal power derived therefrom.

Reply Obj. 1: The sensitive soul is not a perfect self-subsistent

substance. We have said enough (Q. 25, A. 3) on this point, nor need

we repeat it here.

Reply Obj. 2: The generating power begets not only by its own virtue

but by that of the whole soul, of which it is a power. Therefore the

generating power of a plant generates a plant, and that of an animal

begets an animal. For the more perfect the soul is, to so much a more

perfect effect is its generating power ordained.

Reply Obj. 3: This active force which is in the semen, and which is

derived from the soul of the generator, is, as it were, a certain

movement of this soul itself: nor is it the soul or a part of the

soul, save virtually; thus the form of a bed is not in the saw or the

axe, but a certain movement towards that form. Consequently there is

no need for this active force to have an actual organ; but it is

based on the (vital) spirit in the semen which is frothy, as is

attested by its whiteness. In which spirit, moreover, there is a

certain heat derived from the power of the heavenly bodies, by virtue

of which the inferior bodies also act towards the production of the

species as stated above (Q. 115, A. 3, ad 2). And since in this

(vital) spirit the power of the soul is concurrent with the power of

a heavenly body, it has been said that "man and the sun generate

man." Moreover, elemental heat is employed instrumentally by the

soul's power, as also by the nutritive power, as stated (De Anima ii,

4).

Reply Obj. 4: In perfect animals, generated by coition, the active

force is in the semen of the male, as the Philosopher says (De Gener.

Animal. ii, 3); but the foetal matter is provided by the female. In

this matter, the vegetative soul exists from the very beginning, not

as to the second act, but as to the first act, as the sensitive soul

is in one who sleeps. But as soon as it begins to attract

nourishment, then it already operates in act. This matter therefore

is transmuted by the power which is in the semen of the male, until

it is actually informed by the sensitive soul; not as though the

force itself which was in the semen becomes the sensitive soul; for

thus, indeed, the generator and generated would be identical;

moreover, this would be more like nourishment and growth than

generation, as the Philosopher says. And after the sensitive soul, by

the power of the active principle in the semen, has been produced in

one of the principal parts of the thing generated, then it is that

the sensitive soul of the offspring begins to work towards the

perfection of its own body, by nourishment and growth. As to the

active power which was in the semen, it ceases to exist, when the

semen is dissolved and the (vital) spirit thereof vanishes. Nor is

there anything unreasonable in this, because this force is not the

principal but the instrumental agent; and the movement of an

instrument ceases when once the effect has been produced.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part I (Prima Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 717 / 722 题