FIRST ARTICLE [I, Q. 110, Art. 1]

Whether the Corporeal Creature Is Governed by the Angels?

Objection 1: It would seem that the corporeal creature is not

governed by angels. For whatever possesses a determinate mode of

action, needs not to be governed by any superior power; for we

require to be governed lest we do what we ought not. But corporeal

things have their actions determined by the nature divinely bestowed

upon them. Therefore they do not need the government of angels.

Obj. 2: Further, the lowest things are ruled by the superior. But

some corporeal things are inferior, and others are superior.

Therefore they need not be governed by the angels.

Obj. 3: Further, the different orders of the angels are distinguished

by different offices. But if corporeal creatures were ruled by the

angels, there would be as many angelic offices as there are species

of things. So also there would be as many orders of angels as there

are species of things; which is against what is laid down above (Q.

108, A. 2). Therefore the corporeal creature is not governed by

angels.

_On the contrary,_ Augustine says (De Trin. iii, 4) that "all bodies

are ruled by the rational spirit of life"; and Gregory says (Dial.

iv, 6), that "in this visible world nothing takes place without the

agency of the invisible creature."

_I answer that,_ It is generally found both in human affairs and in

natural things that every particular power is governed and ruled by

the universal power; as, for example, the bailiff's power is governed

by the power of the king. Among the angels also, as explained above

(Q. 55, A. 3; Q. 108, A. 1), the superior angels who preside over the

inferior possess a more universal knowledge. Now it is manifest that

the power of any individual body is more particular than the power of

any spiritual substance; for every corporeal form is a form

individualized by matter, and determined to the "here and now";

whereas immaterial forms are absolute and intelligible. Therefore, as

the inferior angels who have the less universal forms, are ruled by

the superior; so are all corporeal things ruled by the angels. This

is not only laid down by the holy doctors, but also by all

philosophers who admit the existence of incorporeal substances.

Reply Obj. 1: Corporeal things have determinate actions; but they

exercise such actions only according as they are moved; because it

belongs to a body not to act unless moved. Hence a corporeal creature

must be moved by a spiritual creature.

Reply Obj. 2: The reason alleged is according to the opinion of

Aristotle who laid down (Metaph. xi, 8) that the heavenly bodies are

moved by spiritual substances; the number of which he endeavored to

assign according to the number of motions apparent in the heavenly

bodies. But he did not say that there were any spiritual substances

with immediate rule over the inferior bodies, except perhaps human

souls; and this was because he did not consider that any operations

were exercised in the inferior bodies except the natural ones for

which the movement of the heavenly bodies sufficed. But because we

assert that many things are done in the inferior bodies besides the

natural corporeal actions, for which the movements of the heavenly

bodies are not sufficient; therefore in our opinion we must assert

that the angels possess an immediate presidency not only over the

heavenly bodies, but also over the inferior bodies.

Reply Obj. 3: Philosophers have held different opinions about

immaterial substances. For Plato laid down that immaterial substances

were types and species of sensible bodies; and that some were more

universal than others; and so he held that immaterial substances

preside immediately over all sensible bodies, and different ones over

different bodies. But Aristotle held that immaterial substances are

not the species of sensible bodies, but something higher and more

universal; and so he did not attribute to them any immediate

presiding over single bodies, but only over the universal agents, the

heavenly bodies. Avicenna followed a middle course. For he agreed

with Plato in supposing some spiritual substance to preside

immediately in the sphere of active and passive elements; because, as

Plato also said, he held that the forms of these sensible things are

derived from immaterial substances. But he differed from Plato

because he supposed only one immaterial substance to preside over all

inferior bodies, which he called the "active intelligence."

The holy doctors held with the Platonists that different spiritual

substances were placed over corporeal things. For Augustine says (QQ.

83, qu. 79): "Every visible thing in this world has an angelic power

placed over it"; and Damascene says (De Fide Orth. ii, 4): "The devil

was one of the angelic powers who presided over the terrestrial

order"; and Origen says on the text, "When the ass saw the angel"

(Num. 22:23), that "the world has need of angels who preside over

beasts, and over the birth of animals, and trees, and plants, and

over the increase of all other things" (Hom. xiv in Num.). The reason

of this, however, is not that an angel is more fitted by his nature

to preside over animals than over plants; because each angel, even

the least, has a higher and more universal power than any kind of

corporeal things: the reason is to be sought in the order of Divine

wisdom, Who places different rulers over different things. Nor does

it follow that there are more than nine orders of angels, because, as

above expounded (Q. 108, A. 2), the orders are distinguished by their

general offices. Hence as according to Gregory all the angels whose

proper office it is to preside over the demons are of the order of

the "powers"; so to the order of the "virtues" do those angels seem

to belong who preside over purely corporeal creatures; for by their

ministration miracles are sometimes performed.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part I (Prima Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 671 / 722 题