SIXTH ARTICLE [I, Q. 108, Art. 6]

Whether the Grades of the Orders Are Properly Assigned?

Objection 1: It would seem that the grades of the orders are not

properly assigned. For the order of prelates is the highest. But the

names of "Dominations," "Principalities," and "Powers" of themselves

imply prelacy. Therefore these orders ought not to be supreme.

Obj. 2: Further, the nearer an order is to God, the higher it is. But

the order of "Thrones" is the nearest to God; for nothing is nearer

to the sitter than the seat. Therefore the order of the "Thrones" is

the highest.

Obj. 3: Further, knowledge comes before love, and intellect is higher

than will. Therefore the order of "Cherubim" seems to be higher than

the "Seraphim."

Obj. 4: Further, Gregory (Hom. xxiv in Evang.) places the

"Principalities" above the "Powers." These therefore are not placed

immediately above the Archangels, as Dionysius says (Coel. Hier. ix).

_On the contrary,_ Dionysius (Coel. Hier. vii), places in the highest

hierarchy the "Seraphim" as the first, the "Cherubim" as the middle,

the "Thrones" as the last; in the middle hierarchy he places the

"Dominations," as the first, the "Virtues" in the middle, the

"Powers" last; in the lowest hierarchy the "Principalities" first,

then the "Archangels," and lastly the "Angels."

_I answer that,_ The grades of the angelic orders are assigned by

Gregory (Hom. xxiv in Ev.) and Dionysius (Coel. Hier. vii), who agree

as regards all except the "Principalities" and "Virtues." For

Dionysius places the "Virtues" beneath the "Dominations," and above

the "Powers"; the "Principalities" beneath the "Powers" and above the

"Archangels." Gregory, however, places the "Principalities" between

the "Dominations" and the "Powers"; and the "Virtues" between the

"Powers" and the "Archangels." Each of these placings may claim

authority from the words of the Apostle, who (Eph. 1:20,21)

enumerates the middle orders, beginning from the lowest saying that

"God set Him," i.e. Christ, "on His right hand in the heavenly places

above all Principality and Power, and Virtue, and Dominion." Here he

places "Virtues" between "Powers" and "Dominations," according to the

placing of Dionysius. Writing however to the Colossians (1:16),

numbering the same orders from the highest, he says: "Whether

Thrones, or Dominations, or Principalities, or Powers, all things

were created by Him and in Him." Here he places the "Principalities"

between "Dominations" and "Powers," as does also Gregory.

Let us then first examine the reason for the ordering of Dionysius,

in which we see, that, as said above (A. 1), the highest hierarchy

contemplates the ideas of things in God Himself; the second in the

universal causes; and third in their application to particular

effects. And because God is the end not only of the angelic

ministrations, but also of the whole creation, it belongs to the first

hierarchy to consider the end; to the middle one belongs the universal

disposition of what is to be done; and to the last belongs the

application of this disposition to the effect, which is the carrying

out of the work; for it is clear that these three things exist in

every kind of operation. So Dionysius, considering the properties of

the orders as derived from their names, places in the first hierarchy

those orders the names of which are taken from their relation to God,

the "Seraphim," "Cherubim," and "Thrones"; and he places in the middle

hierarchy those orders whose names denote a certain kind of common

government or disposition--the "Dominations," "Virtues," and

"Powers"; and he places in the third hierarchy the orders whose names

denote the execution of the work, the "Principalities," "Angels," and

"Archangels."

As regards the end, three things may be considered. For firstly we

consider the end; then we acquire perfect knowledge of the end;

thirdly, we fix our intention on the end; of which the second is an

addition to the first, and the third an addition to both. And because

God is the end of creatures, as the leader is the end of an army, as

the Philosopher says (Metaph. xii, Did. xi, 10); so a somewhat similar

order may be seen in human affairs. For there are some who enjoy the

dignity of being able with familiarity to approach the king or leader;

others in addition are privileged to know his secrets; and others

above these ever abide with him, in a close union. According to this

similitude, we can understand the disposition in the orders of the

first hierarchy; for the "Thrones" are raised up so as to be the

familiar recipients of God in themselves, in the sense of knowing

immediately the types of things in Himself; and this is proper to the

whole of the first hierarchy. The "Cherubim" know the Divine secrets

supereminently; and the "Seraphim" excel in what is the supreme

excellence of all, in being united to God Himself; and all this in

such a manner that the whole of this hierarchy can be called the

"Thrones"; as, from what is common to all the heavenly spirits

together, they are all called "Angels."

As regards government, three things are comprised therein, the first

of which is to appoint those things which are to be done, and this

belongs to the "Dominations"; the second is to give the power of

carrying out what is to be done, which belongs to the "Virtues"; the

third is to order how what has been commanded or decided to be done

can be carried out by others, which belongs to the "Powers."

The execution of the angelic ministrations consists in announcing

Divine things. Now in the execution of any action there are beginners

and leaders; as in singing, the precentors; and in war, generals and

officers; this belongs to the "Principalities." There are others who

simply execute what is to be done; and these are the "Angels." Others

hold a middle place; and these are the "Archangels," as above

explained.

This explanation of the orders is quite a reasonable one. For the

highest in an inferior order always has affinity to the lowest in the

higher order; as the lowest animals are near to the plants. Now the

first order is that of the Divine Persons, which terminates in the

Holy Ghost, Who is Love proceeding, with Whom the highest order of the

first hierarchy has affinity, denominated as it is from the fire of

love. The lowest order of the first hierarchy is that of the

"Thrones," who in their own order are akin to the "Dominations"; for

the "Thrones," according to Gregory (Hom. xxiv in Ev.), are so called

"because through them God accomplishes His judgments," since they are

enlightened by Him in a manner adapted to the immediate enlightening

of the second hierarchy, to which belongs the disposition of the

Divine ministrations. The order of the "Powers" is akin to the order

of the "Principalities"; for as it belongs to the "Powers" to impose

order on those subject to them, this ordering is plainly shown at once

in the name of "Principalities," who, as presiding over the government

of peoples and kingdoms (which occupies the first and principal place

in the Divine ministrations), are the first in the execution thereof;

"for the good of a nation is more divine than the good of one man"

(Ethic. i, 2); and hence it is written, "The prince of the kingdom of

the Persians resisted me" (Dan. 10:13).

The disposition of the orders which is mentioned by Gregory is also

reasonable. For since the "Dominations" appoint and order what belongs

to the Divine ministrations, the orders subject to them are arranged

according to the disposition of those things in which the Divine

ministrations are effected. Still, as Augustine says (De Trin. iii),

"bodies are ruled in a certain order; the inferior by the superior;

and all of them by the spiritual creature, and the bad spirit by the

good spirit." So the first order after the "Dominations" is called

that of "Principalities," who rule even over good spirits; then the

"Powers," who coerce the evil spirits; even as evil-doers are coerced

by earthly powers, as it is written (Rom. 13:3,4). After these come

the "Virtues," which have power over corporeal nature in the working

of miracles; after these are the "Angels" and the "Archangels," who

announce to men either great things above reason, or small things

within the purview of reason.

Reply Obj. 1: The angels' subjection to God is greater than their

presiding over inferior things; and the latter is derived from the

former. Thus the orders which derive their name from presiding are

not the first and highest; but rather the orders deriving their name

from their nearness and relation to God.

Reply Obj. 2: The nearness to God designated by the name of the

"Thrones," belongs also to the "Cherubim" and "Seraphim," and in a

more excellent way, as above explained.

Reply Obj. 3: As above explained (Q. 27, A. 3), knowledge takes place

accordingly as the thing known is in the knower; but love as the

lover is united to the object loved. Now higher things are in a

nobler way in themselves than in lower things; whereas lower things

are in higher things in a nobler way than they are in themselves.

Therefore to know lower things is better than to love them; and to

love the higher things, God above all, is better than to know them.

Reply Obj. 4: A careful comparison will show that little or no

difference exists in reality between the dispositions of the orders

according to Dionysius and Gregory. For Gregory expounds the name

"Principalities" from their "presiding over good spirits," which also

agrees with the "Virtues" accordingly as this name expressed a

certain strength, giving efficacy to the inferior spirits in the

execution of the Divine ministrations. Again, according to Gregory,

the "Virtues" seem to be the same as "Principalities" of Dionysius.

For to work miracles holds the first place in the Divine

ministrations; since thereby the way is prepared for the

announcements of the "Archangels" and the "Angels."

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part I (Prima Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 662 / 722 题