THIRD ARTICLE [I, Q. 89, Art. 3]

Whether the Separated Soul Knows All Natural Things?

Objection 1: It would seem that the separated soul knows all natural

things. For the types of all natural things exist in separate

substances. Therefore, as separated souls know separate substances,

they also know all natural things.

Obj. 2: Further, whoever understands the greater intelligible, will

be able much more to understand the lesser intelligible. But the

separated soul understands immaterial substances, which are in the

highest degree of intelligibility. Therefore much more can it

understand all natural things which are in a lower degree of

intelligibility.

_On the contrary,_ The devils have greater natural knowledge than the

separated soul; yet they do not know all natural things, but have to

learn many things by long experience, as Isidore says (De Summo Bono

i). Therefore neither can the separated soul know all natural things.

_I answer that,_ As stated above (A. 1), the separated soul, like the

angels, understands by means of species, received from the influence

of the Divine light. Nevertheless, as the soul by nature is inferior

to an angel, to whom this kind of knowledge is natural, the soul

apart from the body through such species does not receive perfect

knowledge, but only a general and confused kind of knowledge.

Separated souls, therefore, have the same relation through such

species to imperfect and confused knowledge of natural things as the

angels have to the perfect knowledge thereof. Now angels through such

species know all natural things perfectly; because all that God has

produced in the respective natures of natural things has been

produced by Him in the angelic intelligence, as Augustine says (Gen.

ad lit. ii, 8). Hence it follows that separated souls know all

natural things not with a certain and proper knowledge, but in a

general and confused manner.

Reply Obj. 1: Even an angel does not understand all natural things

through his substance, but through certain species, as stated above

(Q. 87, A. 1). So it does not follow that the soul knows all natural

things because it knows separate substances after a fashion.

Reply Obj. 2: As the soul separated from the body does not perfectly

understand separate substances, so neither does it know all natural

things perfectly; but it knows them confusedly, as above explained in

this article.

Reply Obj. 3: Isidore speaks of the knowledge of the future which

neither angels, nor demons, nor separated souls, know except so far

as future things pre-exist in their causes or are known by Divine

revelation. But we are here treating of the knowledge of natural

things.

Reply Obj. 4: Knowledge acquired here by study is proper and perfect;

the knowledge of which we speak is confused. Hence it does not follow

that to study in order to learn is useless.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part I (Prima Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 553 / 722 题