SECOND ARTICLE [I, Q. 89, Art. 2]

Whether the Separated Soul Understands Separate Substances?

Objection 1: It would seem that the separated soul does not

understand separate substances. For the soul is more perfect when

joined to the body than when existing apart from it, being an

essential part of human nature; and every part of a whole is more

perfect when it exists in that whole. But the soul in the body does

not understand separate substances as shown above (Q. 88, A. 1).

Therefore much less is it able to do so when apart from the body.

Obj. 2: Further, whatever is known is known either by its presence or

by its species. But separate substances cannot be known to the soul

by their presence, for God alone can enter into the soul; nor by

means of species abstracted by the soul from an angel, for an angel

is more simple than a soul. Therefore the separated soul cannot at

all understand separate substances.

Obj. 3: Further, some philosophers said that the ultimate happiness

of man consists in the knowledge of separate substances. If,

therefore, the separated soul can understand separate substances, its

happiness would be secured by its separation alone; which cannot be

reasonably be said.

_On the contrary,_ Souls apart from the body know other separated

souls; as we see in the case of the rich man in hell, who saw Lazarus

and Abraham (Luke 16:23). Therefore separated souls see the devils

and the angels.

_I answer that,_ Augustine says (De Trin. ix, 3), "our mind acquires

the knowledge of incorporeal things by itself"--i.e. by knowing

itself (Q. 88, A. 1, ad 1). Therefore from the knowledge which the

separated soul has of itself, we can judge how it knows other

separate things. Now it was said above (A. 1), that as long as it is

united to the body the soul understands by turning to phantasms, and

therefore it does not understand itself save through becoming

actually intelligent by means of ideas abstracted from phantasms;

for thus it understands itself through its own act, as shown above

(Q. 87, A. 1). When, however, it is separated from the body, it

understands no longer by turning to phantasms, but by turning to

simply intelligible objects; hence in that state it understands

itself through itself. Now, every separate substance "understands

what is above itself and what is below itself, according to the mode

of its substance" (De Causis viii): for a thing is understood

according as it is in the one who understands; while one thing is in

another according to the nature of that in which it is. And the mode

of existence of a separated soul is inferior to that of an angel, but

is the same as that of other separated souls. Therefore the soul

apart from the body has perfect knowledge of other separated souls,

but it has an imperfect and defective knowledge of the angels so far

as its natural knowledge is concerned. But the knowledge of glory is

otherwise.

Reply Obj. 1: The separated soul is, indeed, less perfect considering

its nature in which it communicates with the nature of the body: but

it has a greater freedom of intelligence, since the weight and care

of the body is a clog upon the clearness of its intelligence in the

present life.

Reply Obj. 2: The separated soul understands the angels by means of

divinely impressed ideas; which, however, fail to give perfect

knowledge of them, forasmuch as the nature of the soul is inferior to

that of an angel.

Reply Obj. 3: Man's ultimate happiness consists not in the knowledge

of any separate substances; but in the knowledge of God, Who is seen

only by grace. The knowledge of other separate substances if

perfectly understood gives great happiness--not final and ultimate

happiness. But the separated soul does not understand them perfectly,

as was shown above in this article.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part I (Prima Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 552 / 722 题