FOURTH ARTICLE [I, Q. 22, Art. 4]

Whether Providence Imposes Any Necessity on Things Foreseen?

Objection 1: It seems that divine providence imposes necessity upon

things foreseen. For every effect that has a _per se_ cause, either

present or past, which it necessarily follows, happens from necessity;

as the Philosopher proves (Metaph. vi, 7). But the providence of God,

since it is eternal, pre-exists; and the effect flows from it of

necessity, for divine providence cannot be frustrated. Therefore

divine providence imposes a necessity upon things foreseen.

Obj. 2: Further, every provider makes his work as stable as he

can, lest it should fail. But God is most powerful. Therefore He

assigns the stability of necessity to things provided.

Obj. 3: Further, Boethius says (De Consol. iv, 6): "Fate from the

immutable source of providence binds together human acts and fortunes

by the indissoluble connection of causes." It seems therefore that

providence imposes necessity upon things foreseen.

_On the contrary,_ Dionysius says that (Div. Nom. iv, 23) "to corrupt

nature is not the work of providence." But it is in the nature of some

things to be contingent. Divine providence does not therefore impose

any necessity upon things so as to destroy their contingency.

_I answer that,_ Divine providence imposes necessity upon some things;

not upon all, as some formerly believed. For to providence it belongs

to order things towards an end. Now after the divine goodness, which

is an extrinsic end to all things, the principal good in things

themselves is the perfection of the universe; which would not be, were

not all grades of being found in things. Whence it pertains to divine

providence to produce every grade of being. And thus it has prepared

for some things necessary causes, so that they happen of necessity;

for others contingent causes, that they may happen by contingency,

according to the nature of their proximate causes.

Reply Obj. 1: The effect of divine providence is not only that

things should happen somehow; but that they should happen either by

necessity or by contingency. Therefore whatsoever divine providence

ordains to happen infallibly and of necessity happens infallibly and

of necessity; and that happens from contingency, which the plan of

divine providence conceives to happen from contingency.

Reply Obj. 2: The order of divine providence is unchangeable and

certain, so far as all things foreseen happen as they have been

foreseen, whether from necessity or from contingency.

Reply Obj. 3: That indissolubility and unchangeableness of

which Boethius speaks, pertain to the certainty of providence, which

fails not to produce its effect, and that in the way foreseen; but

they do not pertain to the necessity of the effects. We must remember

that properly speaking "necessary" and "contingent" are consequent

upon being, as such. Hence the mode both of necessity and of

contingency falls under the foresight of God, who provides universally

for all being; not under the foresight of causes that provide only for

some particular order of things.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part I (Prima Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 178 / 722 题