THIRD ARTICLE [I, Q. 12, Art. 3]

Whether the Essence of God Can Be Seen with the Bodily Eye?

Objection 1: It seems that the essence of God can be seen by the

corporeal eye. For it is written (Job 19:26): "In my flesh I shall see

. . . God," and (Job 42:5), "With the hearing of the ear I have heard

Thee, but now my eye seeth Thee."

Obj. 2: Further, Augustine says (De Civ. Dei xxix, 29): "Those

eyes" (namely the glorified) "will therefore have a greater power of

sight, not so much to see more keenly, as some report of the sight of

serpents or of eagles (for whatever acuteness of vision is possessed

by these creatures, they can see only corporeal things) but to see

even incorporeal things." Now whoever can see incorporeal things, can

be raised up to see God. Therefore the glorified eye can see God.

Obj. 3: Further, God can be seen by man through a vision of the

imagination. For it is written: "I saw the Lord sitting upon a

throne," etc. (Isa. 6:1). But an imaginary vision originates from

sense; for the imagination is moved by sense to act. Therefore God can

be seen by a vision of sense.

_On the contrary,_ Augustine says (De Vid. Deum, Ep. cxlvii): "No one

has ever seen God either in this life, as He is, nor in the angelic

life, as visible things are seen by corporeal vision."

_I answer that,_ It is impossible for God to be seen by the sense of

sight, or by any other sense, or faculty of the sensitive power. For

every such kind of power is the act of a corporeal organ, as will be

shown later (Q. 78). Now act is proportional to the nature which

possesses it. Hence no power of that kind can go beyond corporeal

things. For God is incorporeal, as was shown above (Q. 3, A. 1).

Hence He cannot be seen by the sense or the imagination, but only by

the intellect.

Reply Obj. 1: The words, "In my flesh I shall see God my Saviour," do

not mean that God will be seen with the eye of the flesh, but that

man existing in the flesh after the resurrection will see God.

Likewise the words, "Now my eye seeth Thee," are to be understood of

the mind's eye, as the Apostle says: "May He give unto you the spirit

of wisdom . . . in the knowledge of Him, that the eyes of your heart"

may be "enlightened" (Eph. 1:17, 18).

Reply Obj. 2: Augustine speaks as one inquiring, and conditionally.

This appears from what he says previously: "Therefore they will have

an altogether different power (viz. the glorified eyes), if they

shall see that incorporeal nature;" and afterwards he explains this,

saying: "It is very credible, that we shall so see the mundane bodies

of the new heaven and the new earth, as to see most clearly God

everywhere present, governing all corporeal things, not as we now see

the invisible things of God as understood by what is made; but as

when we see men among whom we live, living and exercising the

functions of human life, we do not believe they live, but see it."

Hence it is evident how the glorified eyes will see God, as now our

eyes see the life of another. But life is not seen with the corporeal

eye, as a thing in itself visible, but as the indirect object of the

sense; which indeed is not known by sense, but at once, together with

sense, by some other cognitive power. But that the divine presence is

known by the intellect immediately on the sight of, and through,

corporeal things, happens from two causes--viz. from the perspicuity

of the intellect, and from the refulgence of the divine glory infused

into the body after its renovation.

Reply Obj. 3: The essence of God is not seen in a vision of the

imagination; but the imagination receives some form representing God

according to some mode of similitude; as in the divine Scripture

divine things are metaphorically described by means of sensible

things.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part I (Prima Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 87 / 722 题