SECOND ARTICLE [I, Q. 4, Art. 2]

Whether the Perfections of All Things Are in God?

Objection 1: It seems that the perfections of all things are not in

God. For God is simple, as shown above (Q. 3, A. 7); whereas the

perfections of things are many and diverse. Therefore the perfections

of all things are not in God.

Obj. 2: Further, opposites cannot coexist. Now the perfections of

things are opposed to each other, for each thing is perfected by its

specific difference. But the differences by which genera are

divided, and species constituted, are opposed to each other.

Therefore because opposites cannot coexist in the same subject, it

seems that the perfections of all things are not in God.

Obj. 3: Further, a living thing is more perfect than what merely

exists; and an intelligent thing than what merely lives. Therefore

life is more perfect than existence; and knowledge than life. But the

essence of God is existence itself. Therefore He has not the

perfections of life, and knowledge, and other similar perfections.

_On the contrary,_ Dionysius says (Div. Nom. v) that "God in His one

existence prepossesses all things."

_I answer that,_ All created perfections are in God. Hence He is spoken

of as universally perfect, because He lacks not (says the Commentator,

_Metaph._ v) any excellence which may be found in any genus. This may

be seen from two considerations. First, because whatever perfection

exists in an effect must be found in the effective cause: either in the

same formality, if it is a univocal agent--as when man reproduces man;

or in a more eminent degree, if it is an equivocal agent--thus in the

sun is the likeness of whatever is generated by the sun's power. Now it

is plain that the effect pre-exists virtually in the efficient cause:

and although to pre-exist in the potentiality of a material cause is to

pre-exist in a more imperfect way, since matter as such is imperfect,

and an agent as such is perfect; still to pre-exist virtually in the

efficient cause is to pre-exist not in a more imperfect, but in a more

perfect way. Since therefore God is the first effective cause of

things, the perfections of all things must pre-exist in God in a more

eminent way. Dionysius implies the same line of argument by saying of

God (Div. Nom. v): "It is not that He is this and not that, but that He

is all, as the cause of all." Secondly, from what has been already

proved, God is existence itself, of itself subsistent (Q. 3, A. 4).

Consequently, He must contain within Himself the whole perfection of

being. For it is clear that if some hot thing has not the whole

perfection of heat, this is because heat is not participated in its

full perfection; but if this heat were self-subsisting, nothing of the

virtue of heat would be wanting to it. Since therefore God is

subsisting being itself, nothing of the perfection of being can be

wanting to Him. Now all created perfections are included in the

perfection of being; for things are perfect, precisely so far as they

have being after some fashion. It follows therefore that the perfection

of no one thing is wanting to God. This line of argument, too, is

implied by Dionysius (Div. Nom. v), when he says that, "God exists not

in any single mode, but embraces all being within Himself, absolutely,

without limitation, uniformly;" and afterwards he adds that, "He is the

very existence to subsisting things."

Reply Obj. 1: Even as the sun (as Dionysius remarks, (Div.

Nom. v)), while remaining one and shining uniformly, contains within

itself first and uniformly the substances of sensible things, and many

and diverse qualities; _a fortiori_ should all things in a kind of

natural unity pre-exist in the cause of all things; and thus things

diverse and in themselves opposed to each other, pre-exist in God as

one, without injury to His simplicity. This suffices for the Reply to

the Second Objection.

Reply Obj. 3: The same Dionysius says (Div. Nom. v) that,

although existence is more perfect than life, and life than wisdom, if

they are considered as distinguished in idea; nevertheless, a living

thing is more perfect than what merely exists, because living things

also exist and intelligent things both exist and live. Although

therefore existence does not include life and wisdom, because that

which participates in existence need not participate in every mode of

existence; nevertheless God's existence includes in itself life and

wisdom, because nothing of the perfection of being can be wanting to

Him who is subsisting being itself.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part I (Prima Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 44 / 722 题