Government by Bullies

These picturesque martial incidents are being reproduced every day in

our ordinary life. We are bluffed by hardy simpletons and headstrong

bounders as the Russians were bluffed by Ney; and our Wellingtons

are threadbound by slave-democracy as Gulliver was threadbound by the

Lilliputians. We are a mass of people living in a submissive routine to

which we have been drilled from our childhood. When you ask us to take

the simplest step outside that routine, we say shyly, "Oh, I really

couldnt," or "Oh, I shouldnt like to," without being able to point out

the smallest harm that could possibly ensue: victims, not of a rational

fear of real dangers, but of pure abstract fear, the quintessence of

cowardice, the very negation of "the fear of God." Dotted about among

us are a few spirits relatively free from this inculcated paralysis,

sometimes because they are half-witted, sometimes because they are

unscrupulously selfish, sometimes because they are realists as to money

and unimaginative as to other things, sometimes even because they are

exceptionally able, but always because they are not afraid of shadows

nor oppressed with nightmares. And we see these few rising as if by

magic into power and affluence, and forming, with the millionaires who

have accidentally gained huge riches by the occasional windfalls of our

commerce, the governing class. Now nothing is more disastrous than

a governing class that does not know how to govern. And how can this

rabble of the casual products of luck, cunning, and folly, be expected

to know how to govern? The merely lucky ones and the hereditary ones do

not owe their position to their qualifications at all. As to the rest,

the realism which seems their essential qualification often consists not

only in a lack of romantic imagination, which lack is a merit, but

of the realistic, constructive, Utopian imagination, which lack is

a ghastly defect. Freedom from imaginative illusion is therefore no

guarantee whatever of nobility of character: that is why inculcated

submissiveness makes us slaves to people much worse than ourselves,

and why it is so important that submissiveness should no longer be

inculcated.

And yet as long as you have the compulsory school as we know it, we

shall have submissiveness inculcated. What is more, until the active

hours of child life are organized separately from the active hours of

adult life, so that adults can enjoy the society of children in reason

without being tormented, disturbed, harried, burdened, and hindered

in their work by them as they would be now if there were no compulsory

schools and no children hypnotized into the belief that they must tamely

go to them and be imprisoned and beaten and over-tasked in them, we

shall have schools under one pretext or another; and we shall have all

the evil consequences and all the social hopelessness that result from

turning a nation of potential freemen and freewomen into a nation of

two-legged spoilt spaniels with everything crushed out of their nature

except dread of the whip. Liberty is the breath of life to nations; and

liberty is the one thing that parents, schoolmasters, and rulers spend

their lives in extirpating for the sake of an immediately quiet and

finally disastrous life.

Notes on this etext:

This text was taken from a printed volume containing the

plays "Misalliance", "The Dark Lady of the Sonnets",

"Fanny's First Play", and the essay "A Treatise on Parents

and Children".

Notes on the editing: Italicized text is delimited with

underlines ("_"). Punctuation and spelling retained as in

the printed text. Shaw intentionally spelled many words

according to a non-standard system. For example, "don't" is

given as "dont" (without apostrophe), "Dr." is given as "Dr"

(without a period at the end), and "Shakespeare" is given as

"Shakespear" (no "e" at the end). The pound (currency)

symbol has been replaced by the word "pounds".

Treatise on Parents and Children · 第 65 / 65 题