RONSARD.

If it be true that words create for themselves a special atmosphere, and

that their mere sound calls up vague outer things beyond their strict

meaning, so it is true that the names of the great poets by their mere

sound, by something more than the recollection of their work, produce an

atmosphere corresponding to the quality of each; and the name of Ronsard

throws about itself like an aureole the characters of fecundity, of

leadership, and of fame.

A group of men to which allusion will be made in connection with Du

Bellay set out with a programme, developed a determined school, and

fixed the literary renaissance of France at its highest point. They

steeped themselves in antiquity, and they put to the greatest value it

has ever received the name of poet; they demanded that the poet should

be a kind of king, or seer. Half seriously, half as a product of mere

scholarship, the pagan conception of the muse and of inspiration filled

them.

More than that; in their earnest, and, as it seemed at first, artificial

work, they formed the French language. Some of its most famous and most

familiar words proceed from them--for instance, the word _Patrie_. Some

few of their exotic Greek and Latin adaptations were dropped; the

greater part remained. They have excluded from French--as some think to

the impoverishment of that language--most elements of the Gothic--the

inversion of the adjective, the frequent suppression of the relative,

the irregularity of form, which had survived from the Middle Ages, and

which make the older French poetry so much more sympathetic to the

Englishman than is the new--all these were destroyed by the group of men

of whom I speak. They were called by their contemporaries the Pleiade,

for they were seven stars.

Now, of these, Ronsard was easily the master. He had that power which

our anaemic age can hardly comprehend, of writing, writing, writing,

without fear of exhaustion, without irritability or self-criticism,

without danger of comparing the better with the worse. Five great

volumes of small print, all good--men of that facility never write the

really paltry things--all good, and most of it glorious; some of it on

the level which only the great poets reach here and there. It is in

reading this man who rhymed unceasingly for forty years, who made of

poetry an occupation as well as a glory, and who let it fill the whole

of his life, that one feels how much such creative power has to do with

the value of verse. There is a kind of good humility about it, the

humility of a man who does not look too closely at himself, and the

health of a soul at full stride, going forward. You may open Ronsard at

any page, and find a beauty; you may open any one of the sonnets at

random, and in translating it discover that you are compelled to a fine

English, because he is saying, plainly, great things. And of these

sonnets, note you, he would write thirty at a stretch, and then twenty,

and then a second book, with seventy more. So that as one reads one

cannot help understanding that Italian who said a man was no poet unless

he could rap out a century of sonnets from time to time; and one is

reminded of the general vigour of the age and of the way in which art of

all sorts was mingled up together, when one remembers the tags of

verses, just such verses as these, which are yet to be seen in our

galleries set down doubtfully on the margin of their sketches by the

great artists of Italy.

Ronsard, with these qualities of a leader, unconscious, as all true

leaders are, of the causes of his leadership, and caring, as all true

leaders do, for nothing in leadership save the glory it brings with it,

had also, as have all leaders, chiefly the power of drawing in a

multitude of friends. The peculiar head of his own group, he very soon

became the head of all the movement of his day. He had made letters

really great in the minds of his contemporaries, and having so made

them, appeared before them as a master of those letters. Certainly, as I

shall quote him in a moment when I come to his dying speech, he was

"satiated with glory."

Yet this man did not in his personality convey that largeness which was

his principal mark. His face was narrow, long and aquiline; his health

uneven. It was evidently his soul which made men quickly forget the

ill-matched case which bore it; for almost alone of the great poets he

was consistently happy, and there poured out from him not only this

unceasing torrent of verse, but also advice, sustenance, and a kind of

secondary inspiration for others.

In yet another matter he was a leader, and a leader of the utmost

weight, not the cause, perhaps, but certainly the principal example of

the trend which the mind of the nation was taking as the sixteenth

century drew to a close. I mean in the matter of religion, upon whose

colour every society depends, which is the note even of a national

language, and which seems to be the ultimate influence beyond which no

historical analysis can carry a thinking man.

But even those who will not admit the truth of this should watch the

theory closely, for with the religious trend of France is certainly

bound up, and, as I would maintain, on such an influence is dependent,

that ultimate setting of the French classic, that winding up of the

Renaissance, with which I shall deal in the essay upon Malherbe.

The stream of Catholicism was running true. The nation was tumbling back

after a high and turbulent flood into the channel it had scoured for

itself by the unbroken energies of a thousand years. It is no accident

that Ronsard, that Du Bellay, were churchmen. It is a type. It is a type

of the truth that the cloth admitted poets; of the truth that in the

great battle whose results yet trouble Europe, here, on the soil where

the great questions are fought out, Puritanism was already killed. The

epicurean in them both, glad and ready in Ronsard, sombre and Lucretian

in Du Bellay, jarred indeed in youth against their vows; but that it

should have been tolerated, that it should have led to no excess or

angry revolt, was typical of their moment. It was typical, finally, of

their generation that all this mixture of the Renaissance with the

Church matured at last into its natural fruit, for in the case of

Ronsard we have a noble expression of perfect Christianity at the end.

In the November of 1585 he felt death upon him; he had himself borne to

his home as soon as the Huguenot bands had left it, ravaged and

devastated as it was. He found it burnt and looted, but it reminded him

of childhood and of the first springs of his great river of verse. A

profound sadness took him. He was but in his sixty-second year, his mind

had not felt any chill of age. He could not sleep; poppies and

soporifics failed him. He went now in his coach, now on a litter from

place to place in that country side which he had rendered famous, and

saw the Vendomois for the last time; its cornfields all stubble under a

cold and dreary sky. And in each place he waited for a while.

But death troubled him, and he could not remain. Within a fortnight he

ordered that they should carry him southward to the Loire, to that

priory of which--by a custom of privilege, nobility and royal favour--he

was the nominal head, the priory which is "the eye and delight of

Touraine",--the Isle of St. Cosmo. He sickened as he went. The thirty

miles or so took him three painful days; twice, all his strength failed

him, and he lay half fainting in his carriage; to so much energy and to

so much power of creation these episodes were an awful introduction of

death.

It was upon the 17th of November that he reached the walls wherein he

was Superior; six weeks later, on the second day after Christmas, he

died.

Were I to describe that scene to which he called the monks, all men of

his own birth and training, were I to dwell upon the appearance and the

character of the oldest and the wisest, who was also the most famous

there, I should extend this essay beyond its true limit, as I should

also do were I to write down, even briefly, the account of his just,

resigned, and holy death. It must suffice that I transcribe the chief of

his last deeds; I mean, that declaration wherein he made his last

profession of faith.

Avril: Being Essays on the Poetry of the French Renaissance · 第 23 / 78 题