After all, did John Ruskin really get to the bottom of this matter

of the appeal of Nature to the heart of man? Is the beauty of any

particular scene due to the generic fact that "those ever-springing

flowers and ever-flowing streams had been dyed by the deep colours of

human endurance, valour, and virtue"? If my theory is right that beauty

is subjective, not objective; that the connecting link between the

natural object and the emotion which it evokes is that of memory or

association, surely we must seek for a more particular, a more personal

explanation than this of Ruskin his "human endurance, valour, and

virtue." Well, I too have lounged a whole morning on a mountain top not

far from the spot of which Ruskin wrote. Before me was the valley of

the Arve; behind me, the valley of the Rhône: both, from that height of

vision, and on that perfect day, breathing prosperity and peace. Square

mile after square mile of fertile land lay under my eyes: farms and

vineyards, fields and meadows, all watered by winding streams. Dotted

about, here in groups, there discrete, were the tiled roofs of cottages;

and all through the verdure, in long white curves with an occasional

tangent, here hidden by boscage, there emerging in the sunlight, ran the

good white roads of France. The sweet grass on which I lay was thickly

strewn with flowers, and the air brought scents sweet as softest

music heard afar. To right and left in the middle distance rose Alpine

peaks--light green at their bases, dark green in the zone of the pines,

lifting grey or green or purple masses towards the clouds; and

straight in front, some seven leagues away, stretched the rugged jagged

snow-capped chain of Mont Blanc.

It was early morning, and it was one of those perfect summer days when,

as one lay supine, one could actually perceive the filmy clouds vanish

into invisibility; while, as an addition to the blessings of the scene,

there came to my ear the tinkling bells of the cattle.

And the region was thick with the memories of human endurance, valour,

and virtue. Cæsar's legions strode that soil. Long before Cæsar came,

marauding bands had met and fought. And, since Cæsar's time, owing

to the fortunes of war, war in which man fought hand-to-hand with

man--opposed shield to javelin, discharged the feathered arrow, or

pointed arquebus and carronade--the very ground on which I walked had

changed owners innumerable.

It would be difficult to choose a more appealing scene.--And yet, if

I probe my own heart to the core, if I tell my inmost thought, to me

a sunny--or even, for that matter, a misty--scene in pastoral

England--Surrey or Bucks or Berks, Kent or Devon, Sussex or Herts, where

you will--rouses more poignant emotions than all the plain of Haute

Savoie backed by the Chaine du Mont Blanc.

* * * * *

Mr Kipling, in his simple language, has come nearer to the truth than

has Ruskin with all his felicity of phrase. It is not the associations

connected with human endeavour _in the mass_ that make any particular

scene to appeal, it is the associations connected with our own little

selves; it is because "our hearts are small" that God has

"Ordained for each one spot should prove

Beloved over all."[39]

But, indeed, I think that the great Darwin long ago, quite

incidentally--and quite unwittingly--put his finger upon the crux of the

problem. Speaking of the beauties of the landscape of the East Indian

Archipelago he says: "These scenes of the tropics are in themselves so

delicious, that they almost equal those dearer ones at home, to which

we are bound by each best feeling of the mind."[40] The sublime and

beautiful in Nature call forth our admiration, reverence, awe; it is the

simple scenes, to which associations cling, that call forth our love.

Nature--the sun, the sky, the earth, the sea--is always beautiful,

because Nature, as Man's primæval habitat, has embedded in the memory

of Man primæval associations; but for any one particular scene to arouse

emotions deeper than those evoked by mere form and colour, that scene

must arouse associations embedded in one's own memory or in those of

one's forbears. It may be that this is a generalisation shallow and

jejune. Yet I make it, remembering torrid India; wide Canadian snows;

the Alps and the Jura; the Rhône; the Rhine; the Irawadi; lovely,

lovable England; and those perfumed slopes of le Grand Salève, inhabited

on that early morning only by myself and those grazing cows.

§ 57

Those mild-eyed cattle interested me. They were very gentle, very sleek,

very quiet and patient; large of bone, lactiferous; and, beneath all

their passivity, I should imagine they possessed potentialities of

heroism and endurance unknown to their bovine fellows of the plains. And

if I may judge from the features, figures, and expressions of the women

of this same region, too, I should be inclined to conjecture that they

were not dissimilar in character to their kine. They too are quiet-eyed,

deep-bosomed, large-framed, heavy-buttocked; and in the expression of

their faces there is something patient and heroic. And the youthful

tender of those cattle--he too was interesting. He lay prone on the

grass, his back to Mont Blanc. If he exercised his own limbs but little,

he faithfully performed all the duties appertaining to that state of

life into which it had pleased God to call him by springing every twenty

minutes to his feet and shouting orders to his dog--the faithful sub

or deputy herdsman, who kept the cattle from straying too far. I envied

that youthful herdsman his pleasant occupation. Life in that mountain

air must be sweet to the senses, as companionship with those gentle kine

must be quieting to the mind.

§ 58

It was a wonderful morning, that. How quiet it was, how peaceful! Those

mighty mountains were so still, so soundless. When I was out of sight of

the cattle, the only noise that reached my ear was the hum of the bee at

my elbow, the song of the lark overhead. Nature seemed at peace. Nature

seemed to fraternise with Man. A great comradeship was abroad. With my

own eyes I saw three cows come to their keeper's side, close up to him,

and he, kind soul, stroked their soft and wrinkled cheeks. With my own

eyes I saw a young and curious heifer walk up to the recumbent dog--her

deputy-herdsman--and sniff his hide; and he, good creature, never

twitched an ear!--though presently he did move off, moving somewhat

stiffly, as if his dignity had been ruffled.

* * * * *

And the flowers at my feet, on every side! It was not grass I lay on; it

was blossoms--lovely scented blossoms; and as I looked along the slopes

it was flowers I saw, not blades of grass: it was on a purfled plain I

lay, a plain of blue and green and yellow and purple.--At first I could

hardly bring myself to crush these buds. I kept to cart tracks, to

cattle-paths. But in time these ceased, and I could not choose but

crush. And then ... came a curious thought; one I hardly like to put

on paper. Yet of itself it came, and some perhaps will interpret it

as reverently as did I.--Nature was in repentant mood, and, like

the Magdalen, was once again bedewing Man's feet with her tears, and

bescenting them with her spikenard. She made amends, as it were, for her

treatment of Man.--Fickle, feminine Nature, from whose loins we come,

from whose breast we suck our livelihood; from whom we wrest our

pleasure--with much cost--much cost and strife....

§ 59

Strife! The very word was like a bell to toll me back. Those very

flowers were fighting for their lives. Their very scents and colours

were but enticements for the bee--for the bee which, in turn, with toil,

garnered honey against chimenal famine. And those still, stupendous

mountains--silent, superb--immobile, massive; their very crags bespoke

tremendous struggle, immense upheaval, and the grinding of ice and

glacier. Indeed the solid earth and all about me was unrestful,

rushing.--I lay on my back on the grass and thrust my finger towards

the sky. It seemed steady enough in all conscience. Yet I knew that as

a matter of fact that fingertip of mine was performing most astounding

feats. It was rushing through space. And in its rush it was pursuing a

path would take an expert astronomer to determine. With the rotation of

the earth, it was flying eastwards at more than a dozen miles a minute.

With the revolution of the earth, it was rushing round the sun some two

or three miles in that minute. And with the whole solar system, it was

leaping towards the constellation of Hercules with leaps of more

than seven hundred miles in each minute![41]--Seven hundred miles a

minute![42] It is inconceivable. That enormous mass, the sun, into a

spot on which, hundreds of our earths could be dropped like a handful

of pebbles into a puddle, it and the farthermost of its planets, three

thousand million miles away--all rushing through space ... twenty

miles while I sneeze; thirty thousand miles while I sit at dinner;

half-a-million miles between going to bed and getting up.... What a

stupendous journey! What a mighty company! Where to? What for? Why this

terrific expenditure of energy?--Think of the _ergs_ necessary to propel

that mass! What is being _done_? Who does it? And for whom?

Nothing is immobile in Nature. Nothing is stationary in Life. To exist,

to be, to live, is to become, to change, to strive, to achieve. The

seeming peace about me was outcome of infinite struggle. Only by

struggle does life evolve, does man aspire.

* * * * *

Return we to my theme.

XXIV

Warnings to the Over-Zealous

§ 60

Now, I know precisely what will happen. Some epimethean enthusiast,

carried away by the anticipated delights of a walk, will suddenly make

up his mind to take one; will hastily stuff some things into a bag,

and will start off at four o'clock in the morning with some vague and

distant goal in view. He will think to roll John Burroughs and Richard

Jefferies into one in his minute observation of Nature, and to outdo

Wordsworth and Amiel combined in his philosophico-poetical disquisitions

on the same; he will rid his mind of the world and the worldly, and

float in themes transcendental and abstruse. But I think I know what

will happen. By the afternoon of that selfsame day he will be hungry,

thirsty, footsore, and tired. His boots will be tight; his bag as heavy

as his spirits; his head as empty as his craw. Instead of observing

Nature he will find Nature--in the shape of the rustics (and the

rustics' dogs)--very narrowly observing him, not always with sympathetic

or benignant gaze. Instead of deep and transcendental meditations rising

spontaneously to his mind, he will find curt and practical questions

assailing his ear as to who he is and what he is doing there.--My

dear but epimethean enthusiast, you must know that Nature is a jealous

mistress. If so be you are sedulously engaged for fifty weeks in the

year in the pursuit of pelf, think not to woo her by a half day's

worship at her shrine. Even if your courtship be sincere, it must be

slow. Not in forty-eight hours will you brush away the cobwebs of the

workaday world and prepare for the reception of sweet Nature's

influence a mind free from all uncharitableness: their skies, not their

characters, they change who sail over-seas. From all blindness of heart,

from pride, vainglory, and hypocrisy, you must seek to be delivered,

else you will walk in vain. For most men walk in a vain show, and

the perpetual perambulation of the streets of Vanity Fair is a poor

preparation for the Delectable Mountains.--But take heart. If you will

keep but a corner of your mind free from the carking cares of barter and

commerce--if only by half-holiday jaunts and Sabbath-day journeys, great

will be your reward. By the end of the third or fourth day's tramp, what

with the exhilarating exercise, the fresh air, the peace and loneliness,

the long hours of mental quietude, the freedom from the petty

distractions of social and official life, if you are humble and

childlike, the world forgetting by the world forgot--the scales will

fall from your eyes; then indeed you will see--and feel--and think. The

trivial little objects at your feet, equally with the immense expanses

of earth and sky, will lift you high above themselves; the wet and

drooping high-road weed, the tender green of a curled frond, the soft

ooziness of a summer marsh--the sense of beauty--of the fitness of

things--of their immense incomprehensibility--the wonder of it all ...

words seem useless to say how such things sink into the soul, plough up

its foundations, sow there seeds which, like the Indian juggler's plant,

spring up at once and blossom into worship, reverence, awe.--Believe me,

I am not extravagant or hyperbolic, nor do I beguile with empty words.

If you will not hear me, hear the simple-minded Richard Jefferies:

"I linger in the midst of the long grass, the luxury of the leaves,

and the song in the very air. I seem as if I could feel all the

glowing life the sunshine gives and the south wind calls to being.

The endless grass, the endless leaves, the immense strength of the

oak expanding, the unalloyed joy of finch and blackbird; from all

of them I receive a little.... In the blackbird's melody one note

is mine; in the dance of the leaf shadows the formed maze is for me,

though the motion is theirs; the flowers with a thousand faces have

collected the kisses of the morning. Feeling with them, I receive

some, at least, of their fulness of life. Never could I have enough;

never stay long enough.... The hours when the mind is absorbed by

beauty are the only hours when we really live, so that the longer

we can stay among these things so much the more is snatched

from inevitable Time.... These are the only hours that are not

wasted--these hours that absorb the soul and fill it with beauty.

This is real life, and all else is illusion, or mere endurance. To

be beautiful and to be calm, without mental fear, is the ideal of

Nature. If I cannot achieve it, at least I can think it."[43]

Which passage has received the _imprimatur_ of quotation by no less

an authority than Lord Avebury (better known, perhaps, as Sir John

Lubbock), himself not only a man of science, but a statesman and a man

of affairs as well. Listen:

"The exquisite beauty and delight of a fine summer day in the country

has never perhaps been more truly, and therefore more beautifully,

described."[44]

* * * * *

But surely, with all deference to the learned quoter, there is something

deeper in Richard Jefferies, these his dithyrambs, than a description of

a fine summer day. Surely Jefferies finds himself here, in Amiel's fine

phrase, _tête-à-tête_ with the Infinite, and tries, poor soul, in vain

to find vent for his thoughts. It is not a picture, it is a poem.

Nor needed it the Pageant of Summer to transport this poet thither.

Jefferies was here viewing Nature through a seventh sense--a sense more

delicate than that of sight or sound, the sense that Maurice de Guérin

has defined as,--

"Un sens que nous avons tous, mais voilé, vague, et privé presque de

toute activité, le sens qui recueille les beautés physiques et les

livre à l'âme, qui les spiritualise, les harmonie, les combine

avec les beautés idéales, et agrandit ainsi sa sphère d'amour et

d'adoration"[45]

It is not Richard Jefferies his catalogue of the things he saw which

moves us to admiration and delight, it is his sense sublime which

enabled him to rise from the things which are seen to the things which

are unseen, to rise above the _hic et nunc_ of the parochial and to

peer into the _illuc et tunc_ of the eternal. He saw "into the life of

things," and in him the finite stirred emotions which savoured of the

infinite.

XXV

How that all points to the Infinite

§ 61

Of a sober truth, could we only realise it, all things point to the

infinite. Not a cobweb, not a wisp of morning mist, not a toadstool, not

a gnat, but has a life-history dating back to the dark womb of Time,

or ere even meteoritic dust or incandescent nebulæ were born; dating

forward too, could we trace it, to the dark doom of Time, if for Time

there be a doom. Who can understand it? Who shall explain it?--any part

of it? Take Burns his simple line,--

"Green grow the rashes, O."

To explain "green" is not within the power of profoundest oculist

and physicist combined: on the question of the colour-sense alone the

scientific world is divided and has for years been divided; and of the

precise action of chlorophyll--the green colouring-matter of plants--it

is almost equally ignorant; while of the train of connected phænomena,

from the chemic and catalytic action in the leaf, through the

stimulation of the retina, the transmission along the optic nerve, the

sensation in the corpora quadrigemina of the brain, to the concept in

the mind, we know absolutely nothing. To define and classify the rushes,

also; to know exactly their place in the vegetable kingdom and how they

came there--their evolution from lower forms, the modifications wrought

in their structure by environment and internecine strife--that is beyond

the wit of botanist and palæophytologist in one. And as to that simple

verb, "to grow," dealing, as it does, with life itself in its inmost

penetralia, that has baffled, and probably will for ever baffle, the

whole host of physical and metaphysical experimenters and speculators

world without end. When we can explain Life, we shall be within

measurable distance of explaining the Life-Giver.--Tennyson saw this:

"Flower in the crannied wall,

I pluck you out of your crannies,

I hold you here, root and all, in my hand,

Little flower, but _if_ I could understand

What you are, root and all, and all in all,

I should know what God and man is."

§ 62

But my song has grown too advent'rous. Let us descend th'Aonian

mount.--This, however, let me say: If to somewhat abstruse ontological

speculations such as these you like to add scientific or other knowledge

of the region of your walk--something of the geology, palæontology,

mineralogy, zoology, botany, archæology, history, well and good. No sort

of knowledge but is profitable for doctrine. The interest and pleasure

of walking are greatly enhanced by noting and being able to account for

the thousand and one natural phænomena which greet the eye even in the

shortest stroll; and few things sooner oust petty worries from the mind

than such occupation. Happy is the man who can do this. I, alas, cannot

help you here. I have but a bowing acquaintance with Science, though it

is always with a deep reverence that I doff my hat to her. Nevertheless,

with this I console myself; it seems to matter but little with what sort

of eyes you look on Nature, provided you really look. Give her but

the seeing eye and the understanding heart, and she is lavish of

her gifts.--And (let me roun this in thine ear) perhaps she prefers

(woman-like) the understanding heart to the seeing eye; though

(woman-like again) she likes to be admired as well as understood--though

never (and here most woman-like) does she like to be too curiously

regarded.--Sometimes, I confess, I have envied him gifted with the

scientific eye: him in whom a granite boulder in a grassy mead rouses

long geological trains of thought; to whom the dwarfed horse-tails by

lacustrine shores paint pictures of dense equisetaceous forests; for

whom a fossil trilobite calls up visions of Silurian seas; him too have

I envied who can classify common plants or recognise and name the stones

at his feet: can tell us why the lowly daisy is superior to the lordly

oak; can expatiate on crystallographic angles; and learnedly descant on

amphibole or pyroxene. For myself, I am not versed in the mechanism of

Nature. I have never asked to see the wheels go round. I like to see her

smile, and am not careful as to what oral or buccal muscles are brought

into play for that smile. That she has an anatomy I suppose. But I

bethink me of Actæon's fate, he who saw Dian's naked loveliness

too near. So thou, beware lest thine eye see so much that thy heart

understand too little. Keep thy mind "in a just equipoise of love."

Accomplish that, and no knowledge is too high for thee.

§ 63

Here, however, it is but right to enter a _caveat_. It must be admitted

that it is not given to everyone to hold high converse with Nature.

Nature speaks a cryptic tongue, and unless one has paid some heed to

her language her accents are apt to fall upon deaf ears. Nor can anyone

translate Nature's language to those unversed in her speech. If you

think to hear her voice while the din and clatter of business or

mercature are ringing in your ears, you will hear nothing. Nor, for that

matter, will you see anything. Trees and fields and clouds you may

see, or may think you see; but they will say nothing to you, will mean

nothing to you. To their mere beauty you will be blind; for beauty is a

thing to be felt, not seen.

Goethe declared that Beauty was a primæval phænomenon which had never

yet made its appearance.[46] To Euripides--~kluôn men audên,

omma douch horôn to son~.[47]

And Shelley declares--

"Fair are others; none beholds thee,

. . . . . .

And all feel, yet see thee never."[48]

Beauty is _felt_. That is the clue to the secret. The appeal of natural

beauty is to the heart, to the emotions, not to the intellect. The eyes

of the wisest savant may miss what Nature will reveal to the veriest

babe. This is what Mr Edward Carpenter means when he says, albeit in

somewhat extravagant language--

"As to you, O Moon--

I know very well that when the astronomers look at you through their

telescopes they see only an aged and wrinkled body;

But though they measure your wrinkles never so carefully they do not

see you personal and close--

As you disclosed yourself among the chimney-tops last night to the

eyes of a child--

When you thought no one else was looking.

* * * * *

Anyhow I see plainly that like all created things you do not yield

yourself up as to what you are at the first or the thousandth onset,

And that the scientific people for all their telescopes know as

little about you as any one--

Perhaps less than most.

How curious the mystery of creation."[49]

The poet, bereft of words whereby to give vent to his emotion, falls

back on "the mystery of creation."--Not dissimilarly says Carlyle,

"The rudest mind has still some intimation of the greatness there is

in Mystery."[50] And again, "The _mystical_ enjoyment of an object goes

infinitely farther than the _intellectual_."[51]--It is not alone the

indescribable colour of the delicate corolla, nor is it the minute

knowledge of its astonishing structure, that causes to blaze up in the

beholder a sense of something profound; it is not alone the majestic

heap of the cloud, nor the piercing radiance of the quiet stars, known

to be incomputably distant, that lifts one to the contemplation of

the lofty; it is the immanent, the permanent Mystery that pervades and

unifies all that ever was or is or shall be.

* * * * *

XXVI

The Pleasures of Walking

§ 64

Of Walks and Walking Tours: An Attempt to find a Philosophy and a Creed · 第 5 / 7 段