CHAPTER II.

THE LAW OF SIMILARITY.

The first and most important of the laws to be considered in this

connection is that of SIMILARITY. It is by virtue of this law that the

peculiar characters, qualities and properties of the parents, whether

external or internal, good or bad, healthy or diseased, are

transmitted to their offspring. This is one of the plainest and most

certain of the laws of nature. Children resemble their parents, and

they do so because these are hereditary. The law is constant. Within

certain limits progeny always and every where resemble their parents.

If this were not so, there would be no constancy of species, and a

horse might beget a calf or a sow have a litter of puppies, which is

never the case,--for in all time we find repeated in the offspring the

structure, the instincts and all the general characteristics of the

parents, and never those of another species. Such is the law of nature

and hence the axiom that "like produces like." But while experience

teaches the constancy of hereditary transmission, it teaches just as

plainly that the constancy is not absolute and perfect, and this

introduces us to another law, viz: that of variation, which will be

considered by and by; our present concern is to ascertain what we can

of the law of similarity.

The lesson which this law teaches might be stated in five words, to

wit: _Breed only from the best_--but the teaching may be more

impressive, and will more likely be heeded, if we understand the

extent and scope of the law.

Facts in abundance show the hereditary tendency of physical, mental

and moral qualities in men, and very few would hesitate to admit that

the external form and general characteristics of parents descend to

children in both the human and brute races; but not all are aware that

this law reaches to such minute particulars as facts show to be the

case.

We see hereditary transmission of a peculiar type upon an extensive

scale, in some of the distinct races, the Jews, and the Gypsies, for

example. Although exposed for centuries to the modifying influences of

diverse climates, to association with peoples of widely differing

customs and habits, they never merge their peculiarities in those of

any people with whom they dwell, but continue distinct. They retain the

same features, the same figures, the same manners, customs and habits.

The Jew in Poland, in Austria, in London, or in New York, is the same;

and the money-changers of the Temple at Jerusalem in the time of our

Lord may be seen to-day on change in any of the larger marts of trade.

How is this? Just because the Jew is a "thorough-bred." There is with

him no intermarriage with the Gentile--no crossing, no mingling of his

organization with that of another. When this ensues "permanence of

race" will cease and give place to variations of any or of all sorts.

Some families are remarkable during long periods for tall and handsome

figures and striking regularity of features, while in others a less

perfect form, or some peculiar deformity reappears with equal

constancy. A family in Yorkshire is known for several generations to

have been furnished with six fingers and toes. A family possessing the

same peculiarity resides in the valley of the Kennebec, and the same

has reappeared in one or more other families connected with it by

marriage.

The thick upper lip of the imperial house of Austria, introduced by

the marriage of the Emperor Maximillian with Mary of Burgundy, has

been a marked feature in that family for hundreds of years, and is,

visible in their descendants to this day. Equally noticeable is the

"Bourbon nose" in the former reigning family of France. All the Barons

de Vessins had a peculiar mark between their shoulders, and it is said

that by means of it a posthumous son of a late Baron de Vessins was

discovered in a London shoemaker's apprentice. Haller cites the case

of a family where an external tumor was transmitted from father to son

which always swelled when the atmosphere was moist.

A remarkable example of a singular organic peculiarity and of its

transmission to descendants, is furnished in the case of the English

family of "Porcupine men," so called from having all the body except

the head and face, and the soles and palms, covered with hard

dark-colored excrescences of a horny nature. The first of these was

Edward Lambert, born in Suffolk in 1718, and exhibited before the

Royal Society when fourteen years of age. The other children of his

parents were naturally formed; and Edward, aside from this

peculiarity, was good looking and enjoyed good health. He afterward

had six children, all of whom inherited the same formation, as did

also several grand-children.

Numerous instances are on record tending to show that even accidents

do sometimes, although not usually, become hereditary. Blumenbach

mentions the case of a man whose little finger was crushed and twisted

by an accident to his right hand. His sons inherited right hands with

the little finger distorted. A bitch had her hinder parts paralyzed

for some days by a blow. Six of her seven pups were deformed, or so

weak in their hinder parts that they were drowned as useless. A

pregnant cat got her tail injured; in each of her five kittens the

tail was distorted, and had an enlargement or knob near the end of

each. Horses marked during successive generations with red-hot irons

in the same place, transmit visible traces of such marks to their

colts.

Very curious are the facts which go to show that acquired habits

sometimes become hereditary. Pritchard, in his "Natural History of

Man," says that the horses bred on the table lands of the Cordilleras

"are carefully taught a peculiar pace which is a sort of running

amble;" that after a few generations this pace becomes a natural one;

young untrained horses adopting it without compulsion. But a still

more curious fact is, that if these domesticated stallions breed with

mares of the wild herd, which abound in the surrounding plains, they

"become the sires of a race in which the ambling pace is natural and

requires no teaching."

Mr. T.A. Knight, in a paper read before the Royal Society, says, "the

hereditary propensities of the offspring of Norwegian ponies, whether

full or half-bred, are very singular. Their ancestors have been in the

habit of _obeying the voice_ of their riders and _not the bridle_; and

horse-breakers complain that it is impossible to produce this last

habit in the young colts. They are, however, exceedingly docile and

obedient when they understand the commands of their masters."

A late writer in one of the foreign journals, says that he had a "pup

taken from its mother at six weeks old, who although never taught to

'beg' (an accomplishment his mother had been taught) spontaneously

took to begging for every thing he wanted when about seven or eight

months old; he would beg for food, beg to be let out of the room, and

one day was found opposite a rabbit hutch apparently begging the

rabbits to come and play."

If even in such minute particulars as these, hereditary transmission

may be distinctly seen, it becomes the breeder to look closely to the

"like" which he wishes to see reproduced. Judicious selection is

indispensable to success in breeding, and this should have regard to

_every particular_--general appearance, length of limb, shape of

carcass, development of chest; if in cattle, the size, shape and

position of udder, thickness of skin, "touch," length and texture of

hair, docility, &c., &c.; if in horses, their adaptation to any

special excellence depending on form, or temperament, or nervous

energy.

Not only should care be taken to avoid _structural defects_, but

especially to secure freedom from _hereditary diseases_, as both

defects and diseases appear to be more easily transmissible than

desirable qualities. There is often no obvious peculiarity of

structure, or appearance, indicating the possession of diseases or

defects which are transmissible, and so, special care and continued

acquaintance are necessary in order to be assured of their absence in

breeding animals; but such a tendency although invisible or

inappreciable to cursory observation, must still, judging from its

effects, have as real and certain an existence, as any peculiarity of

form or color.

Every one who believes that a disease may be hereditary at all, must

admit that certain individuals possess certain tendencies which render

them especially liable to certain diseases, as consumption or

scrofula; yet it is not easy to say precisely in what this

predisposition consists. It seems probable, however, that it may be

due either to some want of harmony between different organs, some

faulty formation or combination of parts, or to some peculiar physical

or chemical condition of the blood or tissues; and that this altered

state, constituting the inherent congenital tendency to the disease,

is duly transmitted from parent to offspring like any other quality

more readily apparent to observation.

Hereditary diseases exhibit certain eminently characteristic

phenomena, which a late writer[2] enumerates as follows:

1. "They are transmitted by the male as well as by the female

parent, and are doubly severe in the offspring of parents both

of which are affected by them.

2. They develop themselves not only in the immediate progeny of

one affected by them, but also in many subsequent generations.

3. They do not, however, always appear in each generation in the

same form; one disease is sometimes substituted for another,

analogous to it, and this again after some generations becomes

changed into that to which the breed was originally liable--as

phthisis (consumption) and dysentery. Thus, a stock of cattle

previously subject to phthisis, sometimes become affected for

several generations with dysentery to the exclusion of phthisis,

but by and by, dysentery disappears to give place to phthisis.

4. Hereditary diseases occur to a certain extent independently

of external circumstances; appearing under all sorts of

management, and being little affected by changes of locality,

separation from diseased stock, or such causes as modify the

production of non-hereditary diseases.

5. They are, however, most certainly and speedily developed in

circumstances inimical to general good health, and often occur

at certain, so called, critical periods of life, when unusual

demands on the vital powers take place.

6. They show a striking tendency to modify and absorb into

themselves all extraneous diseases; for example, in an animal of

consumptive constitution, pneumonia seldom runs its ordinary

course, and when arrested, often passes into consumption.

7. Hereditary diseases are less effectually treated by ordinary

remedies than other diseases. Thus, although an attack of

phthisis, rheumatism or opthalmia may be subdued, and the

patient put out of pain and danger, the tendency to the disease

will still remain and be greatly aggravated by each attack.

In horses and neat cattle, hereditary diseases do not usually

show themselves at birth, and sometimes the tendency remains

latent for many years, perhaps through one or two generations

and afterwards breaks out with all its former severity."

The diseases which are found to be hereditary in horses are scrofula,

rheumatism, rickets, chronic cough, roaring, ophthalmia or

inflammation of the eye,--grease or scratches, bone spavin, curb, &c.

Indeed, Youatt says, "there is scarcely a malady to which the horse is

subject, that is not hereditary. Contracted feet, curb, spavin,

roaring, thick wind, blindness, notoriously descend from the sire or

dam to the foal."

The diseases which are found hereditary in neat cattle are scrofula,

consumption, dysentery, diarrhea, rheumatism and malignant tumors.

Neat cattle being less exposed to the exciting causes of disease, and

less liable to be overtasked or exposed to violent changes of

temperature, or otherwise put in jeopardy, their diseases are not so

numerous, and what they have are less violent than in the horse, and

generally of a chronic character.

Scrofula is not uncommon among sheep, and it presents itself in

various forms. Sometimes it is connected with consumption; sometimes

it affects the viscera of the abdomen, and particularly the mesenteric

glands in a manner similar to consumption in the lungs. The scrofulous

taint has been known to be so strong as to affect the foetus, and

lambs have occasionally been born with it, but much oftener they show

it at an early age, and any affected in this way are liable to fall an

easy prey to any ordinary or prevailing disease which develops in such

with unusual severity. Sheep are also liable to several diseases of

the brain and of the respiratory and digestive organs. Epilepsy, or

"fits," and rheumatism sometimes occur.

Swine are subject to nearly the same hereditary diseases as sheep.

Epilepsy is more common with them than with the latter, and they are

more liable to scrofula than any other domestic animals.

When properly and carefully managed, swine are not ordinarily very

liable to disease, but when, as too often kept in small, damp, filthy

styes, and obliged constantly to inhale noxious effluvia, and to eat

unsuitable food, we cannot wonder either that they become victims of

disease or transmit to their progeny a weak and sickly organization.

Swine are not naturally the dirty beasts which many suppose.

"Wallowing in the mire," so proverbial of them, is rather from a wish

for protection from insects and for coolness, than from any inherent

love of filth, and if well cared for they will be comparatively

cleanly.

The practice of close breeding, which is probably carried to greater

extent with swine than with any other domestic animal, undoubtedly

contributes to their liability to hereditary diseases, and when those

possessing any such diseases are coupled, the ruin of the stock is

easily and quickly effected, for as already stated, they are

propagated by either parent, and always most certainly and in most

aggravated form, when occurring in both.

With regard to hereditary diseases, it is eminently true that "an

ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure." As a general and almost

invariable rule, animals possessing either defects or a tendency to

disease should not be employed for breeding. If, however, for special

reasons it seems desirable to breed from one which has some slight

defect of symmetry, or a faint tendency to disease, although for the

latter it is doubtful if the possession of any good qualities can

fully compensate, it should be mated with one which excels in every

respect in which the other is deficient, and on no account with one

which is near of kin to it.

Notwithstanding the importance due to the subject of hereditary

diseases, it is also true that few diseases invariably owe their

development to hereditary causes. Even such as are usually hereditary

are sometimes produced accidentally, (as of course there must be a

beginning to everything,) and in such case, they may, or may not be,

transmitted to their progeny. As before shown, it is certain that they

sometimes are, which is sufficient reason to avoid such for breeding

purposes. It is also well known that, in the horse, for instance,

certain forms of limbs predispose to certain diseases, as bone spavin

is most commonly seen where there is a disproportion in the size of

the limb above and below the hock, and others might be named of

similar character; in all such cases the disease may be caused by an

agency which would be wholly inadequate in one of more perfect form,

but once existing, it is liable to be reproduced in the offspring--all

tending to show the great importance of _giving due heed_ in selecting

breeding animals _to all qualities, both external and internal_, so

long as "like produces like."

FOOTNOTES:

[2] Finlay Dun, V.S., in Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society.

The Principles of Breeding or, Glimpses at the Physiological Laws involved in the Reproduction and Improvement of Domestic Animals · 第 2 / 10 章