TESTIMONY OF DR. CHARLES FRANCIS GREGORY

The testimony of Dr. Charles Francis Gregory was taken at 2:30 p.m.,

on March 23, 1964, at Parkland Memorial Hospital, Dallas, Tex., by Mr.

Arlen Specter, assistant counsel of the President's Commission.

Mr. SPECTER. May the record show that at the start of this session that

I have here at the moment Dr. Charles Gregory, who has appeared here in

response to a letter of request from the President's Commission on the

Assassination of President Kennedy.

May I say to you, Dr. Gregory, that the purpose of the Commission is

to investigate all facets relating to the assassination, including the

wounding of President Kennedy, and the wounding of Governor Connally,

and we have asked you to appear here for the purpose of testifying

concerning your treatment of Governor Connally. Our rules specify that

we make a brief statement of the purpose of the Commission, and the

purpose of our calling on you.

Now, will you stand up and raise your right hand?

Do you solemnly swear the testimony you will give before the

President's Commission in this deposition proceeding will be the truth,

the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?

Dr. GREGORY. I do.

Mr. SPECTER. Will you state your full name for the record, please?

Dr. GREGORY. Dr. Charles Francis Gregory.

Mr. SPECTER. And what is your profession, sir?

Dr. GREGORY. I am a physician and surgeon.

Mr. SPECTER. Will you outline your educational background, please?

Dr. GREGORY. Yes; I received a bachelor of science degree from Indiana

University in 1941, and a doctor of medicine in 1944. I have completed

5 years of post-graduate training in orthopedic surgery at the Indiana

University Medical Center in 1951. I remained there excepting for an

interlude with the U.S. Navy in 1953 and 1954, until 1956. In 1956 I

assumed my present position, which is that of professor of orthopedic

surgery and chairman of the division of orthopedic surgery at the

Southwestern Medical School, University of Texas.

Mr. SPECTER. Dr. Gregory, are you certified by the American Board?

Dr. GREGORY. I am certified by the American Board of Orthopedic

Surgery; yes, sir.

Mr. SPECTER. And what year were you so certified?

Dr. GREGORY. In 1953. I am now a member of the American Board of

Orthopedic Surgery, as a matter of fact.

Mr. SPECTER. Dr. Gregory, what experience, if any, have you had in the

treatment of gunshot wounds?

Dr. GREGORY. My experience with the treatment of gunshot wounds began

with my training in orthopedic surgery, but its greatest impetus

occurred in 1953 and 1954 in the Korean theatre of operations with the

U.S. Navy. Since that time here at the Parkland Hospital in Dallas our

service has attended a considerable number of such injuries, plus my

experience is continuing.

Mr. SPECTER. Could you approximate the total number of gunshot wounds

you have had experience with?

Dr. GREGORY. I have had personal experience with, I suppose, in

approximately 500 such missile wounds.

Mr. SPECTER. Dr. Gregory, back on November 22, 1963, did you have

occasion to treat Governor Connally?

Dr. GREGORY. I did.

Mr. SPECTER. Will you relate briefly the circumstances surrounding your

call to treat the Governor?

Dr. GREGORY. I had been seeing patients in the health service at the

medical school building on the morning of November 22 and was there

when word was received that the President had been shot. I did not then

know that the Governor had also been injured. I came to the emergency

room of Parkland Hospital and upon gaining entrance to it, inquired

as to whether or not Mr. Kennedy's wounds were of a nature that would

require my assistance.

I was advised that they were not. I then took a number of persons from

the emergency room area with me away from it in order to reduce the

confusion, and I went to the orthopedic ward on the fifth floor west of

Parkland Hospital. After attending some of the patients on that ward,

I was preparing to leave the hospital and went by the operating room

area to see whether or not I could be of any other assistance, and

was apprised then that a page was out for me. At that time Dr. Shaw

advised me that Governor Connally had been wounded and that among his

wounds were those to the right forearm and the left thigh. He had asked

that I stay and attend those wounds after he had completed care of the

Governor's chest wound.

Mr. SPECTER. At approximately what time did you have that conversation

with Dr. Shaw?

Dr. GREGORY. To the best of my knowledge, that conversation must have

been about between 1 and 1:15 in the afternoon of November 22.

Mr. SPECTER. And that conversation was with Dr. Shaw?

Dr. GREGORY. Dr. Robert Shaw.

Mr. SPECTER. Now, what part did Dr. Robert Shaw have in the treatment

of Governor Connally in a general way?

Dr. GREGORY. Well, Dr. Robert Shaw attended the most serious wound that

the Governor sustained, which was one to his right chest, and it was

his operation which took precedence over all others.

Mr. SPECTER. And, was that operation completed before your operation

commenced?

Dr. GREGORY. Yes; Dr. Shaw's operation had been completed before we

even arranged the Governor's right arm and left thigh for definitive

care.

Mr. SPECTER. At approximately what time did your operation of Governor

Connally begin?

Dr. GREGORY. My operation on Governor Connally began about 4 o'clock

p.m. on Friday, November 22.

Mr. SPECTER. And approximately how long did it last?

Dr. GREGORY. The better part of an hour--I should judge--45 to 50

minutes.

Mr. SPECTER. Who, if anyone, assisted you in that operation?

Dr. GREGORY. I was assisted by the junior orthopedic resident, Dr.

William Osborne, and the orthopedic intern, Dr. John Parker.

Mr. SPECTER. What was Governor Connally's condition when you first saw

him with respect to his chest wounds, first, if you will, please tell

us?

Dr. GREGORY. I did not see Governor Connally myself until he had been

taken into the operating room and had had an endotracheal tube placed

in his larynx and had been anesthetized. Having accomplished this, the

very precarious mechanics of respiration had been corrected and his

general status at that time was quite satisfactory.

Mr. SPECTER. What observations did you have with respect to his wound

in the chest?

Dr. GREGORY. I had none, really, for the business of prepping and

draping was underway at that time, and I did not intrude other than to

observe very casually, and I don't remember any details of it.

Now, I did see in the course of the operation the wound in his chest,

the wound of entry, and its posterior surface and the wound of exit on

the anterior surface.

Mr. SPECTER. What did the wound of entry look like, Doctor?

Dr. GREGORY. It appeared to me that the wound of entry was sort of

a linear wound, perhaps three-quarters of an inch in length with a

rounded central portion. Whereas, the wound of exit was rather larger

than this, perhaps an inch and a half across.

Mr. SPECTER. And at approximately what part of the body was the wound

that you described as the wound of entry?

Dr. GREGORY. In view of the drapes that were on the Governor at the

time, I will have to speculate, but as I recall best, it was in an area

probably 2 inches below and medial to the right nipple.

Mr. SPECTER. Is that the wound of entry or exit?

Dr. GREGORY. That's the wound of exit.

Mr. SPECTER. How about the wound of entry?

Dr. GREGORY. The wound of entry was too obscure for me to identify,

since it was just in general over the posterior aspect of his chest.

Mr. SPECTER. What did you observe with respect to the wound of his

wrist?

Dr. GREGORY. I didn't see the wound of his wrist until after the chest

operation had been completed, because his arm was covered by the

operation drapes, the surgical drapes for the chest procedure.

Mr. SPECTER. And when you did have an opportunity to observe the wound

of the wrist, what did you then see?

Dr. GREGORY. I observed the wound on the dorsal aspect of his wrist,

which was about 2 cm. in length, ragged, somewhat irregular, and lay

about an inch and a half or 2 inches above the wrist joint. It was a

little to the radial side of the wrist area.

There was a second wound in the wrist on the volar surface, about a

centimeter and a half proximal to the distal flexion crease and this

wound was a transverse laceration no more than a centimeter in length

and did not gape.

Mr. SPECTER. When you say on the dorsal aspect, what is that?

Dr. GREGORY. In lay terms, that's equivalent to the back of the hand.

Mr. SPECTER. And the volar is equivalent to what?

Dr. GREGORY. The palm surface of the hand.

Mr. SPECTER. What conclusion, if any, did you reach as to which was the

wound of entry and exit on the wrist?

Dr. GREGORY. Based on certain findings in the wound at the time the

debridement was carried out----

Mr. SPECTER. Will you define debridement before you proceed with that?

Dr. GREGORY. Yes; debridement is a surgical term used to designate

that procedure in attending a wound which removes by sharp excision

all nonvital tissue in the area together with any identifiable foreign

objects.

In attending this wound, it was evident early that clot had been

carried into the wound from the dorsal surface to the bone and into the

fracture. This would imply that an irregular missile had passed through

the wrist from the dorsal to the volar aspect.

Mr. SPECTER. Now, were there any characteristics in the volar aspect

which would indicate that it was a wound of exit?

Dr. GREGORY. No; there were none, really. It was my assumption that the

missile had expended much of its remaining energy in passing through

the radius bone, which it did before it could emerge through the soft

tissues.

Mr. SPECTER. Did you observe any foreign objects identifiable as bits

of fragments or portions of a bullet missile?

Dr. GREGORY. A preliminary X-ray had indicated that there were metallic

fragments or at least metallic fragments which cast metallic shadows

in the soft tissues around the wounded forearm. Two or three of these

were identified and were recovered and were observed to be metallic

in consistency. These were turned over to appropriate authorities for

further disposition.

Mr. SPECTER. Approximately how large were those fragments, Dr. Gregory?

Dr. GREGORY. I would judge that they were first--flat, rather thin, and

that their greatest dimension would probably not exceed one-eighth of

an inch. They were very small.

Mr. SPECTER. Would you have sufficient experience with gunshot wounds

to comment as to whether a 6.5-mm. bullet could have passed through the

Governor's wrist in the way you have described, leaving the fragments

which you have described and still have virtually all the bullet

missile intact, or having 158 grains of a bullet at that time?

Dr. GREGORY. Well, I am not an expert on ballistics, but one cannot

escape certain ballistic implications in this business.

I would say, first of all, that how much of the missile remains intact

as a mass depends to some extent on how hard the metal is. Obviously,

if it is very soft, as lead, it may lose more fragments and therefore

more weight and volume than it might if it is made of a harder material

or is jacketed in some way.

Now, the energy in the missile is a product, not so much of its mass as

it is of its velocity, for by doubling the velocity, you can increase

the kinetic energy in the force it transmits, fourfold, since the

formula for determining energy in these cases is a matter of mass times

velocity squared, rather than just linear functional velocity. So, some

knowledge of how much of the cartridge force might have been behind the

missile would be useful here too.

Mr. SPECTER. For the purpose of this consideration, I am interested

to know the the metal which you found in the wrist was of sufficient

size so that the bullet which passed through the wrist could not have

emerged virtually completely intact or with 158 grains intact, or

whether the portions of the metallic fragments were so small that that

would be consistent with having virtually the entire 6.5-mm. bullet

emerge.

Dr. GREGORY. Well, considering the small volume of metal as seen by

X-ray, and the very small dimensions of the metal which was recovered,

I think several such fragments could have been flaked off of a total

missile mass without reducing its volume greatly.

Now, just how much, depends of course upon what the original missile

weighed. In other words, on the basis of the metal left behind in

Governor Connally's body, as far as I could tell, the missile that

struck it could be virtually intact, insofar as mass was concerned, but

probably was distorted.

Mr. SPECTER. Would you have any idea at all as to what the fragments

which you observed in the Governor's wrist might weigh, Doctor?

Dr. GREGORY. No, not really, but it would have been very small--very

small.

Mr. SPECTER. What treatment or action did you take with respect to

treating the Governor's wrist for him, Dr. Gregory?

Dr. GREGORY. Upon completing the debridement, we were then faced with a

decision as to whether we should suture his wound in the conventional

manner or not, and we chose not to, leaving the wound open in deference

to potential infection that might be produced by retained fragments

of clothing. Having decided upon that course of action, the fractured

radius bone was then manipulated into a reduced position and the entire

limb was encased in a plaster-paris cast.

Mr. SPECTER. Did that complete your operative procedure?

Dr. GREGORY. That completed my operative procedure for that day for

Governor Connally--yes.

Mr. SPECTER. What other wounds, if any, did you notice on the Governor

at that time?

Dr. GREGORY. In addition to the chest wound and the wound just

described in his right forearm there was a wound in the medical aspect

of his left thigh. This was almost round and did not seem to have

disturbed the tissues badly, but did definitely penetrate and pass

through the skin and to the fascia beneath. I could not tell from the

superficial inspection whether it had passed through the fascia. An

X-ray was made of his thigh at that time and there was not present in

his thigh any missile of sufficient magnitude, in my opinion, to have

produced the wound observed on his medial aspect. Repeat X-rays failed

to reveal any such missile and an additional examination failed to

reveal any wound of exit.

Mr. SPECTER. What did the X-rays reveal with respect to the presence of

a missile?

Dr. GREGORY. In the thigh there was a very small shadow, perhaps 1 mm.

by 2 mm. in dimension, lying close to the medial aspect of the femur,

that is, the thigh bone, but was in my opinion much too small to have

accounted for the dimensions of the wound on the medial aspect of his

thigh or a wound of that character.

Mr. SPECTER. What were the dimensions of the wound on the medial aspect

of his thigh.

Dr. GREGORY. I would say that that wound was about a centimeter in

diameter, much larger than the identifiable fragment of metal in the

thigh. I might add that this prompted some speculation on our part, my

part, which was voiced to someone that some search ought to be made in

the Governor's clothing or perhaps in the auto or some place, wherever

he may have been, for the missile which had produced this much damage

but which was not resident in him.

Mr. SPECTER. Approximately what type of a missile would it have taken

to produce a wound which you have described on his thigh?

Dr. GREGORY. Well, it would take a fragment of metal of approximately

the same diameter--a centimeter, and in general--round.

Mr. SPECTER. Would that correspond with the measurement of a 6.5-mm.

missile?

Dr. GREGORY. I will have to guess--I don't know what dimension--of a

6.5-mm.--yes, a 6.5-mm. would be .65 cm., approximately, yes, that

could have very well have occurred from such a missile, yes, sir.

Mr. SPECTER. Dr. Gregory. I now show you two typewritten pages which

are a portion of a document identified as Commission Exhibit No. 392,

which in its total aspect constitutes all of the medical records from

Parkland Hospital on President Kennedy and Governor Connally and the

two pages to which I direct your attention relate an operation on

Governor Connally, where you are listed as the surgeon, and I ask

you if you will take a minute and look those over and tell us whether

or not that is your report on the operation which you have just been

describing.

Dr. GREGORY. (Examining instrument referred to.) Yes, this appears to

be the essence of the report which I dictated at the conclusion of my

operation on Governor Connally.

Mr. SPECTER. And are the facts contained in this report the same as

those to which you have testified here today?

Dr. GREGORY. I think they are--I hope so.

Mr. SPECTER. Now, will you describe in a general way what treatment you

have given Governor Connally following the time when you completed this

report on November 22, 1963?

Dr. GREGORY. The Governor remained in Parkland Hospital for some 2

weeks after his admission. On the 5th day after the operation, in the

Governor's hospital room, the wound on the dorsal surface of his wrist

was closed by wire sutures and this was carried out in the room. On

the 10th day, I believe it was, the 10th day from injury, the Governor

was taken back to the operating room and there under a light general

anesthesia, his wounds were dressed and inspected, and a new plaster of

paris cast was applied at that time.

The Governor was then permitted up and about with his arm in a sling,

and shortly thereafter returned to the Governor's Mansion in Austin.

I visited Governor Connally in the Governor's Mansion in Austin about

1 week after his discharge from the hospital, simply for check-up

examination and I found things to be in a satisfactory state.

I saw the Governor again about 1 month after his discharge, in

the office of Dr. Robert A. Dennison in Austin, Tex., and another

examination this time, including an X-ray, was made, and again

the condition of his right forearm and of the fractured bone were

considered to be satisfactory.

Now, I've got to think of the next date--off of the record or on as you

wish--

Mr. SPECTER. All right, we will go off of the record, Doctor, while you

are thinking that through.

Dr. GREGORY. All right.

(Discussion between Counsel Specter and the Witness Gregory off the

record.)

Mr. SPECTER. All right, Dr. Gregory.

Dr. GREGORY. I'll say on or about February 14, the Governor came to

Dallas and on that occasion we removed his cast, obtained an X-ray,

found his fracture to be healing satisfactorily, and so we applied a

new cast. The Governor wore that cast until 1 week ago, when he again

came to Dallas. The cast was removed, and X-ray revealed satisfactory

healing of his fracture, and the cast, as a continuous form of

treatment, was discontinued.

At the present time the Governor is on a regiment of exercises, and he

wears a demountable splint, whenever it looks as though the electorate

may be over enthusiastic by shaking his hand.

Mr. SPECTER. Do you anticipate any future cast for Governor Connally?

Dr. GREGORY. I anticipate probably an uneventful, though slow, recovery

of normal function in his right arm and wrist and hand.

I think he will have some permanent impairment, but I think he will

have a very minimal amount of disability, and I do not at this time

anticipate any need for any further surgical intervention. That

will have to become manifest by the appearance of some other as yet

unanticipated symptom.

I would like to add that on each of the examination interviews here in

Dallas, the Governor was also checked over by Dr. Robert Shaw, from the

point of view of recovery from his chest wound.

Mr. SPECTER. Dr. Gregory, I now show you a series of diagrams which are

a part of reports bearing Commission No. 326 and may the record show

these differ from Commission Exhibit numbers, reflecting the number

assigned to reports.

I am going to ask the Court Reporter to mark this particular copy as

Dr. Gregory's Exhibit No. 1.

(Instrument marked by the Reporter as Dr. Gregory's Exhibit No. 1, for

identification.)

Mr. SPECTER. I am going to ask you, pointing first to Diagram No. 1,

whether or not this accurately depicts the wounds of Governor Connally?

Dr. GREGORY. This one does not.

Mr. SPECTER. In what respect?

Dr. GREGORY. In the respect that the wound of entry is shown to exist

on the volar surface of the forearm, whereas, it was on the dorsal

surface of the forearm in my view--in my opinion--and the reverse holds

for the wound of exit.

Mr. SPECTER. Will you take my pen and correct those as they should be,

Doctor Gregory?

Warren Commission (06 of 26): Hearings Vol. VI (of 15) · 第 42 / 317 题