THE TEMPERANCE QUESTION.

Of this question it is the political aspect which at the present time is

most prominent. It is becoming a grave, disturbing force in our politics.

Viewing the temperance cause in the light of political action, it is

clear that it is advancing, and that those who have the cause at heart

have reason to thank God and take courage. No little chagrin was felt

when it was known that the noble action of the people of Iowa a year ago,

in voting for constitutional prohibition, was, owing to a technicality,

of none effect. But again in that great state the battle has been fought;

this time in a different way. The Republican party there had the wisdom

to champion the prohibition measure; this plank was squarely inserted

in the party platform, and in the campaign recently closed it was the

leading issue. We have the result of the election, and it should give

the friends of temperance encouragement and hope. A second time this

righteous principle has triumphed. The Republican party has won the day,

and if its avowed purpose is redeemed in the State of Iowa, the sale of

strong drink will soon be made a crime. We turn to the state of Ohio,

and here, too, we see sure tokens that the temperance cause is moving

forward. The confession comes from prominent politicians, that if, in

Ohio as in Iowa, their party had adopted prohibition it might have been

better. This was not done; but the question in the late election was

submitted to a popular vote and the result, all things considered, is

most encouraging. Some sanguine people may have had faith that the

prohibitory amendment would be carried, but perhaps the number was not

large. That it received the great vote it did in a state where the liquor

interest is of such magnitude and so strongly intrenched, is something to

cheer and make thankful the hearts of good people.

One does not need the vision of a prophet to see that the day of the

triumph of prohibition in our country is coming on. The right is to

win. The time is in the not-distant future when state laws and state

constitutions will say that men shall not make their living by pandering

to the depraved appetite of fellow men. The rum-seller’s business will

be made illegal and criminal. Even those who are looking forward to the

prohibition of the liquor traffic by the national constitution will not

long be called fanatical and visionary. But meanwhile other work for

temperance besides that looking to this condition of things, so much to

be desired, should not be neglected. Personal effort to preserve the

youth and reclaim men is always demanded. People are clearly in error

who say: “Prohibition or nothing.” Laws whose aim is the curtailing of

liquor selling, should be sought, enacted, sustained and enforced as

better than none at all. Until we can have prohibition, let us have as

stringent restrictive enactments as possible. It is a short-sighted view

of things which prompts such a sentiment as this: “If we can not have

prohibition, let us have free rum.” The adage of the “half-loaf” and

the “whole” is full of sound wisdom. We can but think there are earnest

temperance men who make a grave mistake. Prohibition—unquestionably the

true measure to apply to the liquor traffic, and for whose adoption we

should persistently work—fills their minds and hearts. They bend their

energies to secure this. But for other legal measures, falling short

of this desideratum, and aiming only to restrict the wretched traffic,

they have no support. Everywhere restrictive liquor statutes are seen

very imperfectly executed for want of interest and determined effort

on the part of temperance people, whose rigid enforcement would work a

grateful change in our communities. If the law says that the saloon shall

not be opened on Sunday; that it shall be closed at a certain hour of

the night; that intoxicants shall not be sold to youth under a certain

age, or by any provision looks to the diminution of the great curse of

our people, it should be regarded as good so far as it goes, for so

much of prohibition as it contains, and should have the support of good

citizens, though their hope looks and their labors are directed to the

total prohibition by law of the sale of strong drink as a beverage. To

make the best and most of what we have is the true policy in every issue

of life. If we can not have prohibition now, we can see that our laws

are enforced. When they are thoroughly enforced, we will be much nearer

prohibition.

The Chautauquan, Vol. 04, December 1883 · 第 154 / 187 题