Thus it happens that Electra, in the first light of early morning,

stands at the tomb. Her heart is filled with bitter grief. She loathes

the task that she is commanded to perform—the rite which, after years of

callous neglect, is only now offered to the injured shade because some

beginning of fear has come into her mother’s mind. In all this time,

none of the dues that are sacred to the dead had been permitted for

Agamemnon. No libations had been poured, no locks had been shorn from

the head; and even the mourning of Electra and her women had had to be

hidden away from sight and sound of the queen. Now, suddenly, from no

motive of love or reverence to the dead, from no sense of tenderness to

her daughter, from no reason that Electra can perceive save a

premonition of danger to herself, Clytemnestra orders that the proper

ceremonies shall be observed.

Electra cannot see the real motive which sways the queen. Partly from

her very youth and innocence, partly because there is in her a tinge of

the iron temper of her father, she is blind to everything but

Clytemnestra’s guilt. She sees her mother in the light of one fact

only—the murder of the being whom she had loved most dearly. And looking

back upon the past, all its events are viewed through that harsh light.

There was the banishment of her brother Orestes; the coming of the

strange man Egisthus whom, for some reason that she could not then

comprehend, she had always loathed; the return and death of her father;

her own subsequent misery and degradation. With the hardness of youth,

she can conceive of nothing which could explain her mother’s action,

much less palliate it. Her sister Iphigenia she could not clearly

remember; and if the story of her sacrifice was known to Electra, her

absolute devotion to her father accepted it unquestioningly. In no case

could she apprehend how that crime would wound her mother; just as she

could not see or understand the darker side of Agamemnon’s character.

Only one thing was painfully realized—that the great king who was her

father, and who had known how to be tender to the little girl he left at

home in Mycenæ, had been done to death by the woman she called her

mother. And now this woman, whom the years had taught Electra to hate,

commanded her to supplicate the wronged dead for peace. Electra cannot,

and will not, entreat the dead in terms like these; and her first speech

is awful with the bitterness in her heart. She turns to the slaves, the

Trojan women who are attending her:

“_Ministrant women, orderers of the house,

Since ye move with me to this suppliant rite,

Be ye my counsellors, how I must perform it.

When I pour this tribute at the grave,

What words will be in tune? What prayer will please?

Shall I say, Father, from a loving wife

This comes to thy dear soul: yea, from my mother?’

That dare I not.—I know not how to speak,

Shedding this draught upon my father’s tomb.

Or shall I say, as mortals use, ‘Give back

The giver meet return?—to wit, some evil’?

... Be kind, and speak._“[16]

Grief and anger make her speech broken and barely coherent, as her

thoughts are. But below the emotion, and almost unconsciously, there is

a hint of some purpose forming. Once for all she puts aside her mother’s

orders; but she is not clear what will take their place. The dawning

thought has not taken shape yet; and the vague counsels of the women do

not at first help her. But presently they speak the name of Orestes, and

bid her look for help to him. She is startled at the name, and the gleam

of hope it brings lights up the underlying thought. She realizes

suddenly what it means.

ELEC. _Well said and wisely! That most heartens me._

CHO. _Then think of those who shed this blood, and pray—_

ELEC. _How? Teach me; I am ignorant. Speak on._

CHO. _Some power, divine or human, may descend——_

ELEC. _To judge or execute? What wilt thou say?_

CHO. _Few words, but clear. To kill the murderer._[16]

Here then is the thought of her own brain, clothed in words and echoed

back to her from the women whom she has implored to advise. But put thus

into cold language, they have a dreadful sound from which she recoils in

horror.

ELEC. _But will the gods not frown upon such prayer?_

CHO. _Do they not favour vengeance on a foe?_[16]

In this tense dramatic moment, we are shown what the theme of the Drama

is to be. We are shown too, as vividly and almost as rapidly as in a

lightning-flash, the clear outlines of Electra’s character. The

beautiful devotion to her father’s memory: the blind hatred of

Clytemnestra: the desire for revenge vaguely forming, and leaping

full-grown at the first prompting from without; but—and here is the

crux—that desire held in check by a profound religious sentiment. This

reverence for the gods makes the whole tragedy, for Electra and Orestes

both; it provides the dramatist with the inevitable inner conflict round

which the action will revolve; and, most important of all, it has an

ethical significance which will sanctify the revenge of Electra and

Orestes. For while the mere human impulse with them both is to strike

back rapidly and without mercy for the blow that has killed their

father, a higher sense restrains them; and it needs an imperious mandate

from Apollo to nerve them to the deed. This reluctance for the shedding

of blood is a new thing in the age-long record of the house of Tantalus.

When Electra asks whether the gods will not frown upon a prayer for

vengeance, there is the birth of a holier spirit which will atone for

and purify all those old crimes.

But first the final retribution must fall. Electra now lifts her voice

in solemn prayer to the awful gods of the underworld and to the spirit

of her father. She prays for a wiser heart and purer hand than her

mother’s. With almost faltering words—literally constrained thereto, she

says—she prays for vengeance; and she implores that Orestes may return

and claim the throne now occupied by the hated Egisthus.

It is at this moment, just as the prayer closes in the Choral hymn, that

Electra sees the locks of hair upon the tomb. She is amazed, almost

alarmed. There is only one creature in all the world who should bring

such an offering. If any other has placed it here, it is an act of

sacrilege. She takes up the hair, examines it, and speaks about it

rapidly and anxiously to the women. Gradually the conviction dawns that

it can be no other than a votive lock shorn from the head of Orestes

himself. Then he has been here? But where is he now? The thought that he

has indeed returned, that he may even be near at hand at this moment,

drives wild hope and fear alternately through her mind. Holding the lock

within her hand, she says:

“_Ah! could it but speak, and tell me

Kind news, I were not shaken thus and cloven,

Thinking two ways: but either with clear scorn

I would renounce it, as an enemy’s hair;

Or being my brother’s, it should mourn with me,

And pay sweet honours at our father’s tomb._“[16]

Meantime, Orestes in his hiding-place had verified the fact that Electra

was his sister. He had reassured himself, too, on another vital point.

What he had heard and seen had convinced him that this group of women at

least was friendly to his cause. And at its head, holding out against

great odds, and suffering extreme ills in consequence, was this brave

spirit of Electra who, with all her tender and loyal devotion, was

strong enough to dare the uttermost with him. He need no longer delay to

reveal himself. He had heard Electra’s prayer for his return, and for

vengeance on his father’s murderers; and, stepping forward, he came like

an instant answer to her petition.

ORES. _First tell the gods thy former prayer is heard.

Then pray that all to come be likewise good._[16]

But Electra cannot recognize in this tall young man the boy who left

their home so many years before. She is startled and incredulous; and

there follows a curious little scene which, if it occurred in a modern

play, would simply cause derision. Orestes gives such quaint evidence of

his identity—the colour of his hair, which matches her own; the length

of their footprints, which is similar; the embroidery on the robe that

he is wearing, which he says was wrought by her own hands before he went

to Athens. The poet is not very much concerned with probabilities. He

has a great religious purpose which dominates all other considerations;

and in the sublime onward sweep of the tragedy we are not troubled by

minor inconsistencies. At this point they are simply lost sight of, in

the keen dramatic interest of the scene when Electra is at last

convinced that this is indeed her brother. What is proof to her is more

than ample proof to us.

ELEC. _Shall I, in very truth, call thee Orestes?_

ORES. _You see myself ...

Nay, be not lost in gladness! Curb thy heart

We know, our nearest friends are dangerous foes._

ELEC. _Centre of fondness in thy father’s hall,

Tear-watered hope of blessings yet to be,

Faith in thy might shall win thee back thy home!

Oh how I joy beholding thee! Thou hast_

_Four parts in my desires, not one alone.

I call thee Father: and my mother’s claim

Falls to thy side, since utter hate is hers.

And my poor butchered sister’s share is thine.

And I adore thee as my own true brother.

But oh! may holy Right and Victory,

And highest Zeus, the Saviour, speed thee too!_[16]

Then Orestes plainly declares the reason for his return, and taking up

Electra’s prayer to Zeus, he cries for help in the vengeance to be

accomplished for his father. He claims that he has a direct mandate from

Apollo.

ORES. _... Apollo’s mighty word

Will be performed, that bade me stem this peril.

High rose that sovran voice, and clearly spake

Of stormy curses that should freeze my blood,

Should I not wreak my father’s wrongful death.

He bade me pay them back the self-same deed

Maddened by loss of all: yea, mine own soul

Should know much bitterness, were not this done._

_... For one so slain

Sees clearly, though his brows in darkness move!—

The darkling arrow of the dead, that flies

From kindred souls abominably slain ...

Should harass and unman me ..._

_... I should have no share

Of wine or dear libation, but, unseen,

My father’s wrath should drive me from all altars._[16]

Thus the command of Apollo was clear, definite, and imperative; and the

oracular utterance carried with it terrible penalties, should these two

children of the murdered king dare to disobey. Yet we feel, all through

Orestes’ speech, that the conflict is warring within him too. He cannot

accept the mandate implicitly. In the emphasis that he lays on his

authority, in the precise repetition of the very words of the oracle, in

the horror with which he enumerates the threatened punishments, we know

that he is trying to fortify himself against fear and horror at the

deed. Now that he comes close to his actual purpose, a strange new

questioning spirit arises which he strives to appease—a shuddering

reluctance which compels him to throw himself back upon the divine

mandate. “Was not this a word to be obeyed?” he asks; and then, “Yea!

Were it not, the deed must yet be done.”

But struggle as Orestes may, the doubt will not be quelled. The crime of

mother-murder which they contemplate starts up before them in all its

hideous barbarity; and the burden imposed on Orestes is more than he can

bear. As we know, it will lead him ultimately to madness. All through

the _kommos_ which follows, a long and sublimely mournful hymn chanted

alternately by Orestes, Electra and the Chorus, the brother and sister

seem to be battling with this question of the righteousness of their

action. They appeal to Zeus and to the powers of the nether world: they

cry to the spirit of their father: they remind each other of the cruelty

and shamelessness of Clytemnestra: they recall the greatness of

Agamemnon, and contrast it with his ignominious end: they dwell upon the

wrongs done to Electra, and the sin of Egisthus, and the curse upon

their house. The wave of emotion rises and falls. At one moment a solemn

confidence reassures them that the vengeance is righteous; at another,

the doubt sweeps back and shatters their assurance, and again they are

driven to bewail their wrongs and invoke the name of Justice.

ORES. _Father, no word of mine, no deed may bring

Light to the darkness where thou liest below:_

_Yet shall the dirge lament thy matchless woe,

And grace the tomb of Argos’ noblest king...._

ELEC. _Hear me, too, father, mourning in my turn;

Both thine afflicted ones towards thee yearn.

Both outcasts, both sad suppliants at thy tomb.

What dawn may pierce this overwhelming gloom?..._

ORES. _Where is your power to save,

Lords of the grave?

Oh curse, of endless might,

From lips long lost to light,

We, last of Atreus’ race

Implore thy dreadful grace,

Reft of our halls, and outlawed from our right,

Zeus, whither should we turn?_[16]

At this point is felt most strongly the undercurrent of doubt and

horror. It brims and rushes, overwhelming for a time the confident sense

of justice and trust in the oracle of the god. And here the Chorus,

expressing, as its function is, the brooding meditation of an onlooker,

echoes their inmost thought in sympathetic strains:

CHOR. _Again ye make my changeful heart to yearn,

Listening your plaintive cry. One while I feel

My soul with dark misgivings shake and reel,

But by and by the clouds are rolled away

And courage heightens with new hopes of day._

ELEC. _Oh mother! Oh enemy! Oh hard soul!

Like a foe, unhonoured by funeral bowl,

Though a prince, unfollowed by mean or high,

Thou didst bury thy husband without one sigh._

ORES. _Ah! ah! every word there hath stung.

But shall she not pay

For each shame she then flung

On my sire?_

[Illustration:

ELECTRA

_Gertrude Demain Hammond R.I._

]

ELEC. _Thou hearest our father’s death; but I was driven

To grieve apart beneath the dews of heaven;

Chased from the chambers like a thievish hound,

To pour my grief in tears upon the ground,

They came more readily than smiles.... Write this in thy

soul ..._

ORES. _Father, assist thy children in their deed!_

ELEC. _Thy daughter’s tears implore thee in deep need!..._

ORES. _The cause is set. The battle doth begin!_

ELEC. _Oh gods, be just; and make the righteous win!_[16]

The resolution is taken at last. It remains now only to ask their

father’s blessing, before putting it into effect. Orestes begs for power

to rule well in Agamemnon’s stead, and promises rich sacrifices to his

shade.

ELEC. _And I will bring

Choice offerings from all my patrimony

In day of marriage, and will honour first

My father’s tomb from the paternal hall...._

ORES. _Either send justice fighting on our side,

If thou wouldst gain requital for thy fall,

Or grant us to catch them as they caught thee._

ELEC. _Hear this last cry, my father! Look with pity

On these thy young ones sitting at thy grave,

And feel for both, the maiden and the man._[16]

The real crisis of the tragedy is in this wonderful ode, although the

action has all to follow. Doubts and fears are now subdued: Orestes and

Electra have risen to a height of stern conviction which will carry them

to the fulfilment of their purpose, although neither it nor the sanction

of Apollo will save them from remorse. The action moves rapidly now, as

though the revenge must be accomplished at once, in the heat of this

terrible purpose. Orestes is told of Clytemnestra’s dream—that she had

borne a serpent which had turned and rent her breast. He welcomes it

gladly, as an auspicious omen for him; and forms a hasty plan of action.

He and Pylades will apply for entrance at the palace gates, with a

feigned story of Orestes’ death. Electra must make ready for them

within, and secure their admittance. They will kill Egisthus first, and

afterward complete the revenge by the murder of Clytemnestra.

It is not a very skilful plot, but it succeeds. Clytemnestra receives

Orestes and his friend, believing them to be strangers from Phokis. She

is grieved and shocked at their story of Orestes’ death; and goes out to

apprise Egisthus of it. Presently Egisthus passes across the stage

alone, on his way to give an audience to the guests and, though he does

not know it, to pay the penalty for his crime. He goes into the palace,

and an instant afterward he is heard to utter a dreadful cry. Attendants

rush forth, calling upon the name of the queen.

CLYTEM. _What cry is here? What dost thou by the gate?_

ATTEN. _I say, the dead have slain the living there._

CLYTEM. _Ay me! I read thy riddle! Oh! undone!

By guile, even as we slew! Give me an axe,

A strong one; quickly too! I’ll dare the issue,

Be it for me or against me! I am come

To the utterance in this fight with Fate and Doom._[16]

Then there follows an awful scene between Orestes and Clytemnestra, as

she grieves over the body of Egisthus.

ORES. _Was he so dear to thee? Then thou shalt lie

In the same grave with blameless constancy._

CLYTEM. _Oh son, forbear! O child, respect and pity

This breast, whereat thou often, soothed to slumber,

Drainèdst with baby mouth the bounteous milk._[16]

For an instant these poignant words make Orestes waver; and he half

turns to Pylades with an appeal for counsel. But the answer is a stern

reminder of the oracular command; and the pitying moment passes.

ORES. _How should I live with her who killed my sire?_

CLYTEM. _The destinies wrought there. My son! my son!_

ORES. _Destiny works a different doom to-day...._

CLYTEM. _Oh! Wilt thou kill thy mother? O my son!_

ORES. _I kill thee not. Thy sin destroyeth thee...._

CLYTEM. _Ah!_

_I have borne and reared a serpent for my son._

ORES. _Then is fulfilled the terror of thy dream!_[16]

So Clytemnestra falls at the hands of Orestes; but the vengeance has no

joy for him. Before his mother’s mighty spirit has taken its way along

the road to Hades, a torture of remorse has fallen upon her son. Even

while he stands above the murdered body, her avenging Furies come

thronging about him “with Gorgon faces and thick serpent hair” and he

feels his reason totter.

ORES. _Hear me declare:—How this will end I know not.

I feel the chariot of my spirit borne

Far wide. My soul, like an ill-managed courser,

Is carrying me away, while my poor heart

To her own music dances in wild fear._[16]

He cries in anguish to Apollo to justify him; but there comes no answer

from the god; and faster and faster crowd those grizzly spectre forms,

rushing upon him in hideous multitudes, and menacing him with ghastly

torments. And as the tragedy closes, we see Orestes fleeing before the

rout of the Furies to find sanctuary at the shrine of Apollo, while the

Chorus wails:

“_When shall cease

Dread, Atè’s fury? When be lulled to peace?_”[16]

We hear no more of Electra from Æschylus. Measured by action, or even by

language, the part she plays in his trilogy is quite a small one. It is

significant, too, that this her first appearance in Attic Tragedy is not

called by her name, but the _Libation-bearers_. Such a title, while it

serves to remind us of a stage of Greek Drama when the Chorus was the

whole play, indicates also the poet’s conception of the theme. To

Æschylus, the religious act at Agamemnon’s tomb, with all that it

implies, was of much greater import than the figure of the great king’s

daughter. The force of destiny, the amazing mandate of the god and its

conflict with filial love and duty, and the pursuit of the matricide by

the Furies, constitute for him the essence of the tragedy. The spiritual

aspect of the story transcends for him the human interest of it. Hence

his characters, though sublimely great, are great in outline only; and

hence the brief appearance of Electra.

But when we find that Sophocles and Euripides, who wrote about Electra

afterward, have boldly made her the protagonist, and have called their

plays by her name, we are prepared for a change of attitude. The story

is now viewed from a more human standpoint. The protagonist is no longer

a chorus, but a woman: the ruling passion is now not so much a

principle, a moral, a duty, or any idea in the abstract; but strong

human will, intense human love, and mortal hatred. The motive of the

Drama is no longer a religious ceremonial, but the enactment of a tragic

story. And the final result is not now that of a grand moral lesson

conveyed through the lips of shadowy demi-gods, but a really dramatic

drama.

It follows, therefore, that with this change the character of Electra

has taken on a stronger and more complete individuality. In the version

of Sophocles, she rises to her greatest height. She is a creature who

can endure to the end and dare the uttermost: of absorbing love and

strenuous hatred: tender and strong. Unbending and uncompromising, she

is in conflict not only with the mother whom she loathes, but with the

weakness of a sister whom she loves. Implacable to her enemies, she is

capable of absolute devotion to the memory of her father and to the

absent Orestes; and in these contrasted qualities Sophocles has made of

his Electra a tremendously dramatic figure. For the finest drama, and

for the most enthralling story we must go to him. But his purpose seems

to have been merely artistic. He takes a hint from the old legend, and

developing its possibilities to the utmost he evolves a play which is

perhaps more powerful as drama and certainly more perfect as art than

that of Æschylus or Euripides. But it has hardly any other significance.

His conception of Electra, while finely complete and harmonious, is of a

being untroubled by ethical considerations, and casting no fearful

glance ‘before and after.’

With Euripides, on the other hand, the character of the protagonist

becomes more deeply significant than even Æschylus had made her. For

Euripides, the mandate of the god was false, and the vengeance taken was

a stupendous crime against humanity. When Orestes and Electra, wrought

up by passion, have accomplished it, Euripides makes reaction come to

them as to any other mortal being. They are not pursued by visible

Furies, from which they may flee to the sanctuary of Apollo, but by

remorse and cankering doubt of their own motives. For him they are

simply human creatures; and the touch of realism, animated as it is by a

daring sceptical spirit, has laid a blight on much that was beautiful in

the earlier conception of Electra’s character. To recover that, we must

go back to the _Libation-bearers_ of Æschylus.

-----

Footnote 16:

From Professor Lewis Campbell’s translation of the _Choephorœ_

(Clarendon Press).

_Æschylus: Cassandra_

For the beginning of Cassandra’s story we must go back to the epic

theme. The first word which Homer tells of her is in the Thirteenth Book

of the _Iliad_, where she is called “the fairest of Priam’s daughters.”

But that is late in the Siege; and there is a legend which gives her an

earlier connection with the tale of Troy. Indeed, we find that she was a

link in the chain of events which led Helen and the Greek army to her

native city. When she was still a young girl she had, in some mysterious

way, been beloved by the god Apollo. The god gave her the gift of

prophecy; but because she refused his love he angrily confounded the

gift that he could not recall by decreeing that her prophetic utterances

should never be believed. This is the central point round which our

thought about Cassandra must revolve. She is the virgin priestess who

holds herself inviolate even from the embraces of a divine lover; and

she is an oracle of clear vision and stainless truth, whose divination

is cursed with futility.

The events of her career show blacker and more hideous against the clear

light of her spirit. All through the long agony of the Trojan war we

have a sense of Cassandra at the altar, lifting pure hands in

supplication for her dear city. The fighting raged outside the walls

like an angry sea, while inside the town and away in the Greek

encampment all the passions let loose by war raged no less fiercely than

the battle itself. But Cassandra, withdrawn from sight and sound of the

conflict, continued to pray and sacrifice. Her life was consecrated. And

although the gods themselves seemed sometimes leagued against her;

although she had a perception of what the end must be, nothing could

weaken her endurance nor shake her will. The Trojan princes wooed her in

vain: the love of the great Sun-god himself could not make her swerve.

The glory of her beauty: her gift of vision: her lofty impassioned soul,

were vowed irrevocably to the service of her country and her home.

Women of the Classics · 第 7 / 18 段