III

Once upon a time I called Hermann Sudermann the Klingsor of the German

stage, meaning thereby that he was a master of black magic. Of course,

like most comparisons, this was a far-fetched one. Yet Sudermann is a

master of theatrical machinery. With a pressure of his little finger

he can set the wheels whirring and make their noise attractive if not

precisely significant. This is the case with his latest offering, Der

gute Ruf (Good Reputation), which captured Berlin at the Deutsches

Schauspielhaus on the Friedrichstrasse. The play, in four acts, is a

variation on its author's early theme, Honour. It is also a variant of

his Joy of Life (Es lebe das Leben), translated by Edith Wharton, but

with the difference that the motive of Honour was more malleable for

the purpose of dramatic treatment, and also truer to life, while in

Reputation (as I suppose it will be called when translated) the thesis

is too incredible for belief; hence the magician, wily as he is,

scrambles about aimlessly in the last two acts, sparring for wind, and

seemingly anxious to escape from a blind alley of situations. That he

does it so well is a tribute to his technical prowess.

He knows how to write a play. This play would succeed in foreign

countries where the Hauptmann and Schnitzler plays would fall down.

The reason is because of the strong theatrical quality of the piece,

and the grateful role for the heroine, a role that might have been

written in Paris; indeed, the entire work, despite its local flavour,

recalls the modern Parisian theatre of Bernstein & Co., because of its

cynical satire, its mysterious intrigue, its doors and bells, its

numerous exits and entrances.

A woman, rather a superwoman, the Baroness von Tanna, sacrifices her

name--not of the best because she flirts--to save the good, nay,

spotless reputation of her dearest friend, a millionaire's wife--who,

in a "mad moment" (Aha!) becomes the beloved of a certain fascinating

Max, a young and handsome ne'er-do-well. To add to the piquancy of the

situation, the baroness, a beautiful woman, and not, like her friend,

the mother of children, is entangled in the same net; she, too, adores

Max the heart crusher, though she will not cross the Rubicon for his

silly sake. The usual "triangle" becomes star-shaped, for a new

feminine presence appears, a girl who is matched to marry the fatal

Max. That makes five live wires; two husbands, two wives, a naive

virgin, with Max as inaccessible as a star. But after a capital

exposition, Sudermann gets us in a terrible state of mind by making

the lady with the good reputation go off in a hysterical crisis, and

almost confess to her stiff, severe husband--who is a maniac on the

subject of his house being above suspicion. The charming, reckless

baroness intervenes at the crucial point, becomes a lightning-rod that

draws the electric current, and pretends to be the real culprit. Her

husband, a sinister baron and ex-lieutenant in the Hussars, is

present. A duel with Max is the result. In the last act, after she has

been subjected to all kinds of ignominy, Baroness Dorrit von Tanna,

without confessing, is socially rehabilitated. Skim-milk in this

instance has passed for cream, the prudish millionaire's wife, her

honour saved for the world at large, is now revealed as a hypocrite to

her astounded and snobbish husband. The curtain falls on a maze of

improbabilities, with the baroness in the centre.

For people who don't take their theatre seriously, _i. e._, neither as

a fencing ground for propagandists nor for puling poets, this new

Sudermann piece will please. It has triumphed in Berlin and Munich.

Its people are portraits taken from fashionable West End Berlin, while

the dialogue, witty, incisive, and also characteristic, is one of the

consolations of a play that does not for a moment produce any

illusion. There are plenty of striking episodes, but logic is lacking,

not only the logic of life, but the logic of the theatre. No living

playwright knows better how to arouse suspense than Sudermann, and he

can't make us believe in his false theme, consequently his motivation

in the last two acts is false and disappointing. But there is the old

Sudermann pyrotechnical virtuosity, the fireworks dazzle with their

brilliancy, and you think of Paris, and also that some drama may be

divorced from life and literature and yet be interesting. Insincere as

is the denouement, the note of insincerity was absent in the acting of

the cast. The honours were easily borne away by a pretty Viennese

actress from the Volks Theatre there, Elsa Galafres by name, whose

methods are Gallic, whose personality is charming. Critical Berlin has

taken her to itself, and her theatrical fortune is made. It may be

confessed that her part, despite its artificiality, is one that any

actress in the world would jump at. Sudermann is a conjurer. His

puppets are all agreeable, and, in one instance, vital: the father of

the baroness, a financier, who could be easily turned into a "heavy"

conventional father, but, as played by Hermann Nissen, is a positively

original characterisation. Max the butterfly (Ernst Dumcke) was wholly

admirable. I shall be very much surprised if Der gute Ruf does not

soon appear on the stage of other lands. Its picture of manners, its

mundane environment, its epigrams and dramatic bravoura will make it

welcome everywhere. Sudermann is still Klingsor, the evoker of

artificial figures, not the poet who creates living men and women.

Ivory, Apes and Peacocks · 第 51 / 83 题