Aloud I remark:--

"Let me try to set forth, however droll it may sound, the point of view

of a certain class of people, supposing they exist, who might think that

this particular fountain ought never to be cleaned"--and there ensued a

discussion, lasting about half an hour, in the course of which I

elaborated, artfully and progressively, my own thesis, and forged, in

the teeth of some lively opposition, what struck me as a convincing

argument in favour of leaving the fountain alone.

"Then that is why you come to Italy. On account of a certain fountain,

which ought never to be cleaned."

"I said on account of places like this. And I ought to have added, on

account of moments such as these."

"Are those your two reasons?"

"Those are my two reasons."

"Then you have thought about it before?"

"Often."

One should never pass for an imbecile, if one can help it.

"But listen. Surely it is sometimes two o'clock in the afternoon, in

your country?"

"I used that word moment in a pregnant sense," I reply. "Pregnant: when

something is concealed or enclosed within. What is enclosed within this

moment? Our friendly conversation."

"But listen. Surely folks can converse in your country?"

"They can talk."

"I begin to understand why you come here. It is that difference, which

is new to me, between conversing and talking. Is the difference worth

the long journey?"

"Not to everybody, I daresay."

"Why to you?"

"Why to me? I must think about it."

One should never pass for an imbecile, if one can help it.

"What is there to think about? You said you had thought about it

already.... Perhaps there are other reasons?"

"There may be."

"There may be?"

"There must be. Are you satisfied?"

"Ought I to be satisfied before I have learnt them?"

"I find you rather fatiguing this afternoon. Did you hear about that

murder in Trastevere last night and how the police----"

"But listen. Surely you can answer a simple question. Why do you come to

Italy...?"

Why does one come here?

A periodical visit to this country seems an ordinary and almost

automatic proceeding--a part of one's regular routine, as natural as

going to the barber or to church. Why seek for reasons? They are so hard

to find. One tracks them to their lair and lo! there is another one

lurking in the background, a reason for a reason.

The craving to be in contact with beauty and antiquity, the desire for

self-expression, for physical well-being under that drenching sunshine,

which while it lasts, one curses lustily; above all, the pleasure of

memory and reconstruction at a distance. Yes; herein lies, methinks, the

secret; the reason for the reason. Reconstruction at a distance.... For

a haze of oblivion is formed by lapse of time and space; a kindly haze

which obliterates the thousand fretting annoyances wherewith the

traveller's path in every country is bestrewn. He forgets them; forgets

that weltering ocean of unpleasantness and remembers only its sporadic

islets--those moments of calm delight or fiercer joy which he would fain

hold fast for ever. He does not come here on account of a certain

fountain which ought never to be cleaned. [21] He comes for the sake of

its mirage, that sunny phantom which will rise up later, out of some

November fog in another land. Italy is a delightful place to remember,

to think and talk about. And is it not the same with England? Let us go

there as a tourist--only as a tourist. How attractive one finds its

conveniences, and even its conventionalities, provided one knows, for an

absolute certainty, that one will never be constrained to dwell among

them.

What lovely things one could say about England, in Timbuktu!

Rome is not only the most engaging capital in Europe, it is unusually

heterogeneous in regard to population. The average Parisian will assure

you that his family has lived in that town from time immemorial. It is

different here. There are few Romans discoverable in Rome, save across

the Tiber. Talk to whom you please, you will soon find that either he or

his parents are immigrants. The place is filled with hordes of

employees--many thousands of them, high and low, from every corner of

the provinces; the commoner sort, too, the waiters, carpenters,

plasterers, masons, painters, coachmen, all the railway folk--they are

hardly ever natives. Your Roman of the lower classes does not relish

labour. He can do a little amateurish shop-keeping, he is fairly good as

a cook, but his true strength, as he frankly admits, consists in eating

and drinking. That is as it should be. It befits the tone of a

metropolis that outsiders shall do its work. That undercurrent of

asperity is less noticeable here than in many towns of the peninsula.

There is something of the grande dame in Rome, a flavour of old-world

courtesy. The inhabitants are better-mannered than the Parisians; a

workday crowd in Rome is as well-dressed as a Sunday crowd in Paris. And

over all hovers a gentle weariness.

The city has undergone orgies of bloodshed and terror. Think only,

without going further back, of that pillage by the Spanish and German

soldiery under Bourbon; half a year's pandemonium. And all those other

mediaeval scourges, epidemics and floods and famines. That sirocco, the

worst of many Italian varieties: who shall calculate its debilitating

effect upon the stamina of the race? Up to quite a short time ago,

moreover, the population was malarious; older records reek of malaria;

that, assuredly, will leave its mark upon the inhabitants for years to

come. And the scorching Campagna beyond the walls, that forbidden land

in whose embrace the city lies gasping, flame-encircled, like the

scorpion in the tale....

A well-known scholar, surveying Rome with the mind's eye, is so

impressed with its "eternal" character that he cannot imagine this site

having ever been occupied otherwise than by a city. To him it seems

inevitable that these walls must always have stood where now they

stand--must have risen, he suggests, out of the earth, unaided by human

hands. Yet somebody laid the foundation-stones, once upon a time;

somebody who lived under conditions quite different from those that

supervened. For who--not five thousand, but, say, five hundred years

ago--who would have thought of building a town on a spot like this? None

but a crazy despot, some moonstruck Oriental such as the world has

known, striving to impress his dreams upon a recalcitrant nature. No

facilities for trade or commerce, no scenic beauty of landscape, no

harbour, no defence against enemies, no drinking water, no mineral

wealth, no food-supplying hinterland, no navigable river--a dangerous

river, indeed, a perpetual menace to the place--every drawback, or

nearly so, which a town may conceivably possess, and all of them huddled

into a fatally unhealthy environment, compressed in a girdle of fire and

poison. Human ingenuity has obviated them so effectually, so

triumphantly that, were green pastures not needful to me as light and

air, I, for one, would nevermore stray beyond those ancient portals....

The country visits you here. It comes in the wake of that evening breeze

which creeps about with stealthy feet, winding its way into the most

secluded courtyards and sending a sudden shiver through the frail

bamboos that stand beside your dinner-table in some heated square. Then

the zephyr departs mysteriously as it came, and leaves behind a great

void--a torrid vacuum which is soon filled up by the honey-sweet

fragrance of hay and aromatic plants. Every night this balsamic breath

invades the town, filling its streets with ambrosial suggestions. It is

one of the charms of Rome at this particular season; quite a local

speciality, for the phenomenon could never occur if the surrounding

regions were covered with suburbs or tilth or woodland--were aught save

what they are: a desert whose vegetation of coarse herbage is in the act

of withering. The Campagna once definitely dried, this immaterial feast

is at an end.

I am glad never to have discovered anyone, native or foreign, who has

been aware of the existence of this nocturnal emanation; glad because it

corroborates a theory of mine, to wit, that mankind is forgetting the

use of its nose; and not only of nose, but of eyes and ears and all

other natural appliances which help to capture and intensify the simple

joys of life. We all know the civilised, the industrial eye--how

atrophied, how small and formless and expressionless it has become. The

civilised nose, it would seem, degenerates in the other direction. Like

the cultured potato or pumpkin, it swells in size. The French are

civilised and, if we may judge by old engravings (what else are we to

take as guide, seeing that the skull affords some criterion as to shape

but not size of nose?) they certainly seem to accentuate this organ in

proportion as they neglect its use. Parisians, it strikes me, are

running to nose; they wax more rat-like every day. Here is a little

problem for anthropologists. There may be something, after all, in the

condition of Paris life which fosters the development of this peeky,

rodential countenance. Perfumery, and what it implies? There are

scent-shops galore in the fashionable boulevards, whereas I defy you to

show me a single stationer. Maupassant knew them fairly well, and one

thinks of that story of his:--

"Le parfum de Monsieur?"

"La verveine...." [22]

Speaking of the French, I climbed those ninety odd stairs the other day

to announce my arrival in Italy to my friend Mrs. N., who, being vastly

busy at that moment and on no account to be disturbed, least of all by a

male, sent word to say that I might wait on the terrace or in that

microscopic but well-equipped library of hers. I chose the latter, and

there browsed upon "Emaux et Camées" and the "Fleurs du Mal" which

happened, as was meet and proper, to lie beside each other.

Strange reading, at this distance of time. These, I thought--these are

the things which used to give us something of a thrill.

If they no longer provide that sensation, it may well be that we have

absorbed their spirit so thoroughly into our system that we forget

whence we drew it. They have become part of ourselves. Even now, one

cannot help admiring Gautier's precision of imagery, his gift of being

quaint and yet lucid as a diamond; one pictures those crocodiles

fainting in the heat, and notes, too, whence the author of the "Sphinx"

drew his hard, glittering, mineralogical flavour. The verse is not so

much easy as facile. And not all the grace of internals can atone for

external monotony. That trick--that full stop at the end of nearly every

fourth line--it impairs the charm of the music and renders its flow

jerky; coming, as it does, like an ever-repeated blow, it grows

wearisome to the ear, and finally abhorrent.

Baudelaire, in form, is more cunning and variegated. He can also delve

down to deeps which the other never essayed to fathom. "Fuyez l'infini

que vous portez en vous"--a line which, in my friend's copy of the book,

had been marked on the margin with a derisive exclamation-point. (It

gave me food for thought, that exclamation-point.) But, as to substance,

he contains too many nebulosities and abstractions for my taste; a

veritable mist of them, out of which emerges--what? The figure of one

woman. Reading these "Fleurs du Mal" we realise, not for the first time,

that there is something to be said in favour of libertinage for a poet.

We do not need Petrarca, much less the Love-Letters of a Violinist--no,

we do not need those Love-Letters at all--to prove that a master can

draw sweet strains from communion with one mistress, from a lute with

one string; a formidable array of songsters, on the other hand, will

demonstrate how much fuller and richer the melody grows when the

instrument is provided with the requisite five, the desirable fifty.

Monogamous habits have been many a bard's undoing.

Twenty years' devotion to that stupid and spiteful old cat of a

semi-negress! They make one conscious of the gulf between the logic of

the emotions and that other one--that logic of the intellect which ought

to shape our actions. Here was Baudelaire, a man of ruthless

self-analysis. Did he never see himself as others saw him? Did he never

say: "You are making a fool of yourself"?

Be sure he did.

You are making a fool of yourself: are not those the words I ought to

have uttered when, standing in the centre of the Piazza del Popolo--the

sunny centre: so it had been inexorably arranged--I used to wait and

wait, with eyes glued to the clock hard by, in the slender shadow of

that obelisque which crawled reluctantly, like the finger of fate, over

the burning stones?

And I crawled with it, more than content.

Days of infatuation!

I never pass that way now without thanking God for a misspent youth. Why

not make a fool of yourself? It is good fun while it lasts; it yields

mellow mirth for later years, and are not our fellow-creatures, those

solemn buffoons, ten times more ridiculous? Where is the use of

experience, if it does not make you laugh? The Logic of the

Intellect--what next! If any one had treated me to such tomfoolery while

standing there, petrified into a pillar of fidelity in that creeping

shadow, I should have replied gravely:

"The Logic of the Intellect, my dear Sir, is incompatible with

situations like mine. It was not invented for so stupendous a crisis. I

am waiting for my negress--can't you understand?--and she is already

seven minutes late...."

A flaming morning, forestaste of things to come.

I find myself, after an early visit to the hospital where things are

doing well, glancing down, towards midday, into Trajan's Forum, as one

looks into some torrid bear-pit.

Broken columns glitter in the sunshine; the grass is already withered to

hay. Drenched in light and heat, this Sahara-like enclosure is

altogether devoid of life save for the cats. The majority are dozing in

a kind of torpor, or moribund, or dead. My experiences in the hospital

half an hour ago dispose me, perhaps, to regard this menagerie in a more

morbid fashion than usual. To-day, in particular, it seems as if all the

mangy and decrepit cats of Rome had given themselves a rendezvous on

this classic soil; cats of every colour and every age--quite young ones

among them; all, one would say, at the last gasp of life. This pit, this

crater of flame, is their "Home for the Dying." Once down here, nothing

matters any more. They are safe at last from their old enemies, from

dogs and carriages and boys. Waiting for death, they move about in a

stupid and dazed manner. Sunlight streams down upon their bodies. One

would think they preferred to expire in the shade of some pillar or

slab. Apparently not. Apparently it is all the same. It matters nothing

where one dies.

There is one immediately below me, a moth-eaten desiccated

tortoiseshell; its eyes are closed and a red tongue hangs out of the

mouth. I drop a small pebble. It wakes up and regards me stoically for a

moment. Nothing more.

These cats have lost their all--their self-respect. Grace and ardour,

sleekness of coat and buoyancy of limbs are gone out of them. Tails are

knotted with hunger and neglect; bones protrude through the skin. So

they strew the ground in discomposed, un-catlike attitudes, while the

sun burns through their parched anatomy. Do they remember their

kittenish pranks, those moonlight ecstasies on housetops, that morsel

snatched from a fishmonger's barrow and borne through the crowded

traffic in a series of delirious leaps? Who can tell! They are not even

bored with themselves. Their fur is in patches. They are alive when they

ought to be dead. Nobody knows it better than they do. They are too ill,

too far gone, to feel any sense of shame at their present degradation.

Nothing matters! What would Baudelaire, that friend of cats, have said

to this macabre exhibition?

Yonder is an old one, giving milk to the phantom of a kitten. The parent

takes no interest in the proceedings; she lies prone, her head on the

ground. Her eyes have a stony look. Is she dead? Possibly. Her own

kitten? Who cares! Her neighbour, once white but now earth-coloured,

rises stiffly as though dubious whether the joints are still in working

order. What does she think of doing? It would seem she has formed no

plan. She walks up to the mother, peers intently into her face, then

sits apart on her haunches and begins gazing at the sun. Presently she

rises anew and proceeds five or six paces for no imaginable

reason--collapses; falls, quite abruptly, on her side. There she lies,

flat, like a playing-card.

A sinister aimlessness pervades the actions of those that move at all.

The shadow of death is upon these creatures in the scorching sunshine.

They stare at columns of polished granite, at a piece of weed, at one

another, as though they had never seen such things before. They totter

about on tip-toe; they yawn and forget to shut their mouths. Here is

one, stretching out a hind leg in a sustained cramp; another is

convulsed with nervous twitchings; another scratches the earth in a kind

of mechanical trance. One would say she was preparing a grave for

herself. The saddest of all is an old warrior with mighty jowl and a

face that bears the scars of a hundred fights. One eye has been lost in

some long-forgotten encounter. Now they walk over him, kittens and all,

and tread about his head, as if he were a hillock of earth, while his

claws twitch resentfully with rage or pain. Too ill to rise!

Most of them are thus stretched out blankly, in a faint. Are they

suffering? Hungry or thirsty? [23] I believe they are past troubling

about such things. It is time to die. They know it....

"L'albergo dei gatti," says a cheery voice at my side--some countryman,

who has also discovered Trajan's Forum to be one of the sights of Rome.

"The cats' hotel. But," he adds, "I see no restaurant attached to it."

That reminds me: luncheon-time.

Via Flaminia--what a place for luncheon! True; but this is one of the

few restaurants in Rome where, nowadays, a man is not in danger of being

simultaneously robbed, starved, and poisoned. Things have come to a

pretty pass. This starvation-fare may suit a saint and turn his thoughts

heavenwards. Mine it turns in the other direction. Here, at all events,

the food is straightforward. Our hostess, a slow elderly woman, is

omnipresent; one realises that every dish has been submitted to her

personal inspection. A primeval creature; heaviness personified. She

moves in fateful fashion, like the hand of a clock. The crack of doom

will not avail to accelerate that relentless deliberation. She reminds

me of a cousin of mine famous for his imperturbable calm who, when his

long curls once caught fire from being too near a candle, sleepily

remarked to a terrified wife: "I think you might try to blow it out."

But where shall a man still find those edible maccheroni--those that

were made in the Golden Age out of pre-war-time flour?

Such things are called trifles.... Give me the trifles of life, and keep

the rest. A man's health depends on trifles; and happiness on health.

Moreover, I have been yearning for them for the last five months. Hope

deferred maketh the heart sick.... There are none in Rome. Can they be

found anywhere else?

Mrs. Nichol: she might know. She has the gift of knowing about things

one would never expect her to know. If only one could meet her by

accident in the street! For at such times she is gay and altogether at

your disposal. She is up to any sport, out of doors. To break upon her

seclusion at home is an undertaking reserved for great occasions. The

fact is, we are rather afraid of Mrs. Nichol. The incidents of what she

describes as a tiresome life have taught her the value of masculine

frankness--ultra-masculine, I call it. She is too frank for subterfuge

of any kind. When at home, for instance, she is never "not at home." She

will always see you. She will not detain you long, if you happen to be

de trop.

This, I persuade myself, is a great occasion--my health and

happiness.... Besides, I am her oldest friend in this part of the world;

was I not on the spot when she elected, for reasons which nobody has yet

fathomed, to make Rome her domicile? Have I not more than once been

useful to her, nay, indispensable? I therefore climb, not without

trepidation, those ninety-three stairs to the very summit of the old

palace, and presently find myself ushered into the familiar twilight.

Nothing has changed since I was here some little time ago to announce my

arrival in Italy (solemn occasion), when I had to amuse myself for an

hour or so with Baudelaire in the library, Mrs. Nichol being engaged

upon "house-accounts." This time, as I enter the studio, she is playing

cards with a pretty handmaiden, amid peals of laughter. She often plays

cards. She is puffing at a cigarette in a long mouthpiece which keeps

the smoke out of her olive-complexioned face and which she holds

firm-fixed between her teeth, in a corner of the mouth, after the perky

fashion of a schoolboy. I have interrupted a game, and at once begin to

feel de trop under a glance from those smouldering grey eyes.

"It is not a trifle. It is a matter of life and death. Will you please

listen for half a minute? Then I will evaporate, and you can go on with

your ridiculous cards. The fact is, I am being assassinated by inches.

Do you know of a place where a man can get eatable macaroni nowadays?

The old kind, I mean, made out of pre-war-time flour...."

She lays her hand on the cards as though to suspend the game, and asks

the girl in Italian:

"What was the name of that place?"

"That place----"

"Oh, stupid! Where I stayed with Miranda last September. Where I tore my

skirt on the rock. Where I said something nice about the white

macaroni?"

"Soriano in Cimino."

"Soriano," echoes the mistress in a cloud of smoke. "There is a tram

from here every morning. They can put you up."

A pause follows. I would like to linger and talk to this sultry and

self-centred being; I would like to wander with her through these rooms,

imbibing their strange Oriental spirit--not your vulgar Orient, but

something classic and remote; something that savours, for aught I know,

of Indo-China, where Mrs. Nichol, in one of her immature efforts at

self-realisation, spent a few years as the wife of a high French

official, ere marrying, that is, the late lamented Nichol--another

unsuccessful venture.

Now why did she marry all these people (for I fancy there was yet an

earlier alliance of some kind)? A whim, a freak? Or did they plague her

into it? If so, I suspect they lived and died to repent their manly

persistence. She could grind any ordinary male to powder. And why has

she now flitted here, building herself this aerial bower above the old

roofs of Rome? Is she in search of happiness? I doubt whether she will

find it. She possesses that fatal craving--the craving for disinterested

affection, a source of heartache to the perfect egoist for whom

affection of this particular kind is not a necessity but a luxury, and

therefore desirable above all else--desirable, and how seldom attained!

The pause continues. I make a little movement, to attract notice. She

looks up, but only her eyes reply.

"Now, my good fellow," they seem to say, "are you blind?"

That is the drawback of Mrs. Nichol. Phenomenally absent-minded, she

always knows at a given moment exactly what she wants to do. And she

never wants to do more than one thing at a time. It is most unwomanly of

her. Any other person of her sex would have left a game of cards for the

sake of an attractive visitor like myself. Or, for that matter, an

ordinary lady would have played cards, given complicated orders to

dressmakers and servants, and entertained half a dozen men at the same

time. Mrs. Nichol cannot do these things. That hand, that rather

sunburnt little hand without a single ring on it, has not moved from the

table. No, I am not blind. It is quite evident that she wants to play

cards; only that, and nothing more.

Alone(#7380) · 第 53 / 71 题