It was the advice of a great and good man, (to his clergy, I suspect,)

that they should read the Bible _with a special object_: and an

excellent recent writer has repeated the same advice; namely that men

should "read with a view to some particular inquiry, with purpose to

clear up some peculiar question of interest, which," (says he,) "you may

create for yourselves[257]." I entreat _you_ to do nothing of the kind.

Whatever advantages may result to an advanced student from adopting this

practice, to _you_ it _must_ be fraught with unmingled evil. You will be

tempted to overrate the importance of everything you discover which

suits your present purpose: you will disregard all that looks in a

different direction: you will be disappointed if you meet with nothing

_ad rem_: you will get a habit of slurring over many chapters, many

whole books of the Bible. A very little reflection will convince you

that it must be as I say. _Who_, for example, could be expected to find

delight and edification in the calendar of the Deluge, who had

determined to read Genesis with a view to discovering what knowledge

existed in the patriarchal age of a future life? No. Your wisdom will

be to divest your minds, as much as possible, of _any_ preconceived

notion as to what the Bible contains, or was intended to teach you. You

should wish to find there nothing so much as the authentic evidence of

_what_ Divine Wisdom hath seen fit to communicate to man. Read it

therefore, if you are wise, with unaffected curiosity: settling down

upon every flower, in order to find out, if you can, _where_ the honey

_is_: clinging to it rather, _until you have found_ the honey. Say to

yourself,--"It cannot be that all these details of months and days

should be given in vain[258]. I _must_ find out the reason of it." And,

at last, you will find,--what you will find.--"Very strange," (you will

learn to say to yourself,) "that the history of nearly 1600 years should

be curdled into one short chapter[259]; and yet that three verses of the

Bible should be devoted to the history of a man's losing his way in a

field, and then finding it again[260]!" The subject may be worth

thinking about. You are perhaps naturally disposed to take what you are

pleased to call "a common sense view" of the meaning of Holy Scripture;

and to interpret it after a very dry unlovely fashion of your own: to

evacuate its deeper sayings, and to doubt the mysterious significancy of

its historical details. You will speedily perceive, however, that the

Apostles and Evangelists of CHRIST,--as many as were moved by the HOLY

SPIRIT of GOD, and spoke not their own words but _His_,--that all these

are against you: and the effect of this discovery on an honest and good

heart, reading not in order to be confirmed in some preconceived

opinion, but with a sincere desire of enlightenment in Divine

things,--may be anticipated. Bishop Horsley relates that by a yet

simpler process he became disabused of a favourite fancy with which he

set out,--namely, that prophecy must of necessity carry a single

meaning[261].--The attitude of mind which I so strongly recommend you to

assume, (and it depends on an act of the Will, whether you assume it or

not,) is very exactly represented by the cry of the child

Samuel,--"Speak LORD, for Thy servant heareth!"

It seems right, in the fewest words, to state what we _do_,--and what we

do _not_,--expect to result from such a study of the Bible as this; in

other words, to assign the office of unassisted Biblical study. I would

not willingly have my meaning mistaken _here_.

It is not implied then, for a moment, that a man is either at liberty,

or able, to gather his own Religion for himself out of the Bible. The

very thought were monstrous. But it is a widely different thing for one

of yourselves to read his Bible patiently, and humbly, and laboriously,

through,--without prejudice or theory,--unmolested by critical notes,

undistracted by human comments, uninfluenced by party views:--all this,

I say, is a widely different thing from a man's inventing his own system

of Divinity. Members of the Catholic Church,--born in a Christian

country,--educated amid the choicest influences for good,--_you_ are by

no means so left to yourselves. THE BOOK OF COMMON PRAYER is your

sufficient safeguard. The framework of the Faith,--the conditions under

which you may lawfully speculate about Divine mysteries,--are all

prescribed for you: and within those limits you cannot well go wrong.

On the other hand, the outlines of _Moral Theology_, (as it may be

called), you are fully competent to detect for yourselves. GOD'S

strictness in punishing sin, as in the case of Moses[262];--the efficacy

of repentance, as in the case of Ahab[263];--the sure answer to prayer,

(to _forgotten_ prayer, it may be!) as in the case of

Zacharias[264];--the seemingly roundabout methods of GOD'S providence,

(as in the case of Abraham,) yet conducting inevitably to a blessed

issue at the last;--the rewards of obedience[265];--the faithfulness of

the Divine promises;--the boundless wealth of the Divine contrivance,

which, on man's repentance, is able to convert even a curse into a

blessing, as in the case of Levi[266];--the peace and joy surely in

reserve for those who fear GOD, as in the case of Joseph;--the extent to

which things seemingly trivial are noticed by the Ancient of Days, as

every page of the Bible shows;--these, and a hundred points like these,

not only a man can gather for himself out of the Book of God's Law, but

no one else can do the work for him. He _must_ discover all such matters

for himself.

And need I point out, for a minute, the immense advantage with which a

mind so stored with Divine knowledge will approach the Ministry; and

finally take in hand the actual oversight of the flock? It is really not

to be expressed. The Bishop's examination for Orders will become nothing

but an agreeable exercise, instead of an object of dread. You are quite

sure of a few approving words in _that_ quarter. But, (what is a

thousand times more important,) you yourself feel safe and strong. You

begin to read some treatise on Divinity; and you find yourself in some

degree competent to test the writer's statements, to endorse or to

suspect his conclusions, because you are familiar with the Rule of Faith

which he himself employed. It becomes your turn at last to instruct

others,--from the pulpit for example; and instead of timid truisms, and

vague generalities, you are able to draw a bold clear outline round

almost any department of Christian doctrine. You can explain with

authority.--You are not afraid to catechize before the congregation: for

although your Theological attainments are but slender after all, yet,

you know your Bible well; and even if an absurdly wrong answer is given

you, you know how to single out from the hank the golden thread of

Truth, and to display it before the eyes of men and Angels. And let me

tell you, by way of ending the subject, we should hear less about dull

sermons, and inattentive congregations, and badly filled churches,--as

well as about the astounding ignorance of many among the upper classes,

in Divine things,--if our younger Clergy knew the Bible a great deal

better than they do.--Aye, and we should not have so many unsound

remarks about Holy Scripture either,--so many mistaken views of

doctrine,--so many crude remarks about Inspiration,--made _by persons

who ought to know better_.

You will perceive that I am saying all this, (except the last few

words,) _at_ you, (the younger men present;) because in _you_ I see many

of the future Clergy of England. And I say it, because, (for the last

time,) I do entreat you, one and all, to follow the advice I have been

giving you; and to set about such a careful study of the Bible, _at

once_. Do not put it off for a single day. Begin it tomorrow morning.

You will then have mastered Genesis this term, finishing the last

chapter on Sunday the 10th of December; and on Monday, the 11th, you

will have to read the first chapter of Exodus. I am confident that you

will remember _this_ day and hour with gratitude to the end of your

lives, if you will but make the experiment and persevere.

And just one word to those who aspire, (and all _should_ aspire,) to

University honours. You will not find what I have been recommending any

hindrance to you at all. But even supposing you _do_, now and then, find

the inexorable daily half-hour stand in the way of something

else,--shall not the very thought of Him whose Voice you have

deliberately resolved to hear daily at that fixed time, make you full

amends? Shall you resolve to pluck so freely of the Tree of Knowledge,

and yet begrudge the approach once a day to the _Tree of Life_, which

grows in the midst of the Paradise of GOD? Shall ample time be found for

works of fiction,--for the Review, and the Magazine, and the

newspaper,--yet half an hour a day be deemed too much to be given to the

Word of GOD? What? room for everything and everybody; yet still "no room

in the Inn" for _CHRIST_!... I have, (I speak honestly,) I have far too

high an opinion of your instincts for good, to think it possible. You

have plenty of faults,--(_God_ knoweth!),--but I am very much deceived

indeed if there be not a spirit stirring among the young men of this

place, overflowing with promise; a real inclination, (obscured at times,

but still very energetic,) for whatever things are pure, and lovely, and

of good report.

Of course, it is implied by what goes before, that you will read _no_

work _of Divinity_ just at present. Be counselled, on no account, to

read any. Above all, shun the partial, ill-digested pamphlet,--and the

one-sided review,--and the controversial letter,--and the Essay which

seems to have been written in order to prove nothing. Be content, for

the next three years, to study no book of Divinity but the Bible.

And the study of _that_ Book, I repeat, you will find no hindrance, no

impediment, no burthen to you at all. On the contrary. It will render

you a very singular service,--let your classical and logical studies be

as severe as they will; (and they cannot well be too severe, too

engrossing,--for this is your golden opportunity which never will, never

_can_, come back again!) The undersong of "Siloa's brook that flows,

fast by the oracle of GOD," will many a time soothe and refresh your

else dry and weary spirit. What was begun as a task will soon come to be

regarded as a privilege. _That_ jealously-guarded half-hour will be

found to be the one green spot in the whole day,--like Gideon's fleece,

fresh with the dew of the early morning, when it is "dry upon all the

earth beside." Your secret study of that Book of Books, I say, will

render you a very singular service. The contrast between the Divine and

Human method will strike you with ever-recurring power. Unlike every

other History, the Bible removes the veil, and discovers the causes of

things,--including the First Great Cause of all, who dwelleth in Light

unapproachable, but who yet humbleth Himself to behold, and to controul,

and to overrule for good, the things which are done in Heaven and on

Earth. And thus, it is not too much to say that the Bible, to one who

reads its pages aright, is a certain clue to every other History,--as

well as a perpetual commentary on every other Book. It informs the

judgment, and cleanses the eye, throughout the whole department of

Morals: and as for History, what is it all, but the evidence of GOD in

the world,--"traces of _His_ iron rod, or of _His_ Shepherd's

staff[267]?"

Profoundly sensible am I, that these have been very unintellectual, and

somewhat common-place remarks: but I would rather, a hundred times, be

of use to the younger men present; I would rather, a hundred times,

succeed in persuading one of _them_, to adopt that method of reading the

Bible which I have been recommending;--than try to say something which

might be thought fine and clever.... Let me only, in conclusion,

faithfully remind them, that the _true_ office of the study of Divine

things is not, by any means, that which, for obvious reasons, I have

been rather dwelling and enlarging upon. It is _not_ merely to inform

the understanding, that Holy Scripture is to be read with such

consummate attention, and studied with such exceeding care. It is _not_

for the illustration of History, or in order that it may be made a test

of the value of other systems of Morals. _Not_, by any means, in order

to facilitate admission into Holy Orders, (for which only some of you

are destined;)--or to render a man's pulpit-addresses attractive and

agreeable;--or even to enable a parish priest to teach with confidence

and authority;--is he entreated now to "prevent the night watches," if

need be, that he may be occupied (like one of old time[268],) with GOD'S

Word. O no! It is,--in order that his inner life may be made

conformable to that outer Law[269]: that his aims may be ennobled, and

his motives purified, and his earthly hopes made consistent with the

winning of an imperishable crown! It is in order that when he wavers

between Right and Wrong, the unutterable Canon of GOD'S _Law_ may

suggest itself to him as a constraining motive. Its aim, and purpose,

and real function, is, that the fiery hour of temptation may find the

Christian soldier armed with "the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word

of GOD[270]:"--that the dark season of Adversity may find his soul

anchored on the Rock of Ages,--which alone can prove his soul's

sufficient strength and stay.... Of a truth, as Life goes on, Men will

find the blessedness of their Hope; if they have not found it out

already. Under every form of trial,--and under every strange

vicissitude;--in sickness,--and in perplexity,--and in bereavement,--and

in the hour of death;--"LORD,--to _whom_ shall we go? Thou,--_Thou_ hast

the words of Eternal Life!"

FOOTNOTES:

[243] Preached in Christ-Church Cathedral, Oct. 21st, 1860.

[244] =tên synagôgên=,--from which it would appear that there was but

_one_. See Bishop Middleton on St. Luke vii. 5.

[245] Rom. i. 16.

[246] Heb. iv. 12.

[247] St. Matth. xxiv. 35, &c.

[248] St. John xii. 48.

[249] St. John i. 1, &c.

[250] Ibid. vii. 40-43.

[251] Ibid. i. 45, 46.

[252] St. Luke ii. 48.

[253] Is. vii. 14.

[254] St. Mark vi. 3.

[255] Our Lord's words in St. John viii. 47 are so cited by Archbishop

Whately in the Appendix of his Logic.--(App. II. No. 12, p. 418.)

[256] Consider all such places as St. John xi. 45, 46.

[257] Blunt's _Duties of a Parish Priest_,--p. 81.

[258] Gen. vii. 4 to viii. 14.

[259] Ibid. v.

[260] Ibid. xxxvii. 15, 16, 17.

[261] See Appendix A.

[262] Deut. iii. 25, 26.

[263] 1 Kings xxi. 27-29.

[264] St. Luke i. 13.

[265] Jerem. xxxv. 18, 19.

[266] Comp. Gen. xlix. 5-7, with Exod. xxxii. 26-28, (alluded to in

Deut. xxxiii. 9,) and finally Numb. iii. 9 and 45, and Josh. xxi. 3-8.

[267] The Rev. C. Marriott's _Sermons_,--vol. I. p. 441.

[268] Ps. cxix. 148.

[269] Not so _Essays and Reviews_, pp. 36 and 45.

[270] Eph. vi. 17.

SERMON II.[271]

* * * * *

NATURAL SCIENCE AND THEOLOGICAL SCIENCE.

* * * * *

HEBREWS xi. 3.

_Through Faith, we understand that the worlds were framed by the Word of

GOD._

St. Paul, in a famous and familiar chapter of his Epistle to the

Hebrews, having declared "what Faith is," proceeds, (as the heading of

the chapter expresses it), to note "the worthy fruits thereof in the

Fathers of old time." The Book of Genesis was obviously in his hands, or

in his heart, while he wrote: for he appeals to the transactions there

recorded, in the very order, and often in the very words, of Moses. The

HOLY GHOST, I say, directs our attention to what is contained in the

ivth,--vth,--vith,--xiith,--xviith,--xxiind,--xxviith,--xlviiith,--and

lth chapters of Genesis. But He begins with a yet earlier chapter. _He

begins with the first._ Abel,--Enoch,--Noah,--Abraham,--Sarah,--Isaac,

--Jacob,--Joseph;--these stand forward as samples of God's faithful

ones. But with them, the HOLY GHOST proposes to associate _us_.

Moreover, He gives _us_ the place of honour. Before mentioning one of

_their_ acts of Faith, He mentions one of _ours_. We come first,--then

they. And the particular field in which _we_ shine out so

conspicuously,--the special province which is assigned to _us_,--that

portion of the inspired Narrative wherein _you and I_ are supposed to

shew a degree of undoubting faith which entitles us to rank with those

"Fathers of old time,"--is found to be _the first chapter of the Book of

Genesis_. "Through Faith _we_ understand that the worlds were framed by

the Word of God." An honourable place, and an honourable function truly!

I would to GOD that it might be as gratifying to every one of the

congregation, as it is to the preacher, to discover that _this_ is the

special stand-point which has been reserved for him and for them.

Since, however, it is impossible to forget that we have sometimes seen

heads, which are supposed to be very much indeed in advance of the age,

shaken ominously at the very chapter which the text bequeaths and

commends to the special acceptance of you and me,--I propose that, in

the very briefest manner, we now review the contents of that chapter; in

order that we may discover what is the special absurdity, or

impossibility, or improbability, or by whatever other name the thing is

to be called,--which makes it quite out of the question that you or I

should undertake the act of Faith here assigned us.

I read then, that "In the beginning, GOD created the Heaven and the

Earth:"--by which I understand, that, at some remote period,--which may

or may not baffle human Arithmetic[272],--it was the pleasure of GOD

the FATHER, GOD the SON, GOD the HOLY GHOST,--_three_ Persons, coeternal

and coequal,--_one_ GOD,--out of nothing, to create the entire Universe.

"All things that are in Heaven, and that are in Earth, visible and

invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or

powers: all things were created by Him[273];" and they were created out

of nothing. The word in the original does not indeed necessarily imply

as much: but since there is _no_ word in Hebrew, (any more than there is

in Greek, Latin, or English,) peculiarly expressive of the notion of

creating out of nothing, it need not excite our surprise that Moses does

not employ such a word to describe what God did "in the

beginning."--_Then_ it was, in the grey of that far distant morning I

mean, that all those glittering orbs which sow the vault of Heaven with

brightness and with beauty, flashed into sudden being. "Thou, even Thou,

art LORD alone: Thou hast made Heaven, the Heaven of Heavens, _with all

their host[274]_." Suns, the centres of systems, many of them so distant

from this globe of ours, that sun and system scarce shew so bright as a

single lesser star: suns, I say, with their marvellous equipage of

attendant bodies,--_our_ sun among the rest, with all those wandering

fires which speed their unwearied courses round it: suns, and planets

with their moons, bathed once and for ever in the fountain of that Light

which GOD inhabited from all Eternity, then marshalled themselves in

mysterious order, according to "the counsel of His will[275]:" yea, and

with their furniture, unimagined and unimaginable, went careering

through the untrodden realms of space, each on its several errand of

glory, because of obedience to its Maker's sovereign Law[276]. "By the

Word of the LORD," (as it is written,) "were the Heavens made; and all

the hosts of them by the breath of His mouth[277]!"

Now, it is reserved to the geologist,--(Nature's High-priest!)--to guess

at the condition of this Earth of ours throughout all the long period of

unchronicled ages which immediately succeeded the birthday of Time. It

is for _him_ to guess at the successive changes which this globe of ours

underwent; and the progressive cycles of Creation of which it was the

theatre; and the many strange races of creatures which, one after

another, moved upon its surface,--walking the dry, or inhabiting the

moist. _He_ shall guess; and _I_ will sit at his feet and listen, with

unfeigned gratitude, wonder, and delight, while he reports to me his

guesses: (for the really great man is eager to assure me that they are

no more.)--But when his tale of perplexity is ended, and the last 6,000

years of this world's History have to be discussed, the geologist's

function is at an end. I bid him, in GOD'S Name, be silent; for now it

is GOD that speaketh. If any question be moved as to how _that actual

system of things to which Man belongs_, began,--I bid him come down, and

take the learner's place; for now _I_ mean to assume his vacant chair.

_This_ time, there shall at least be no guess-work. GOD is now the

Speaker: and what GOD revealeth unto _me_, _that_ I promise faithfully

to report to _him_.

There was a time, then,--and it was certainly less than 6,000 years

ago,--when "the Earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon

the face of the deep." What catastrophe it was which had caused that the

fountains of the abyss should be broken up, and the solid Earth

submerged, I am not concerned to explain:--nor how it had come to pass

that from a world of seas and continents, it had become a watery ball,

wrapped about with superincumbent vapour:--nor how the blessed sunlight

had suffered dire eclipse;--so that the Earth revolved in a horror of

great darkness. _My faith_ however is not troubled,--nor even

perplexed,--by the strangeness of these things. Shall I think it a mere

matter of course that one little flaw in a pipe shall, in a second of

time, transform the orderly well-compacted seats of a goodly Church to

one unsightly mass of shapeless and disordered ruin[278]; and shall I

pretend to stand aghast at the strangeness of a similar overthrow of

this Earth's furniture at the mere fiat of the Most High?... Behold, "He

measureth the waters in the hollow of His Hand, and weigheth the

mountains in scales[279]." What if the Creator of the earth and the sea

shall bid them of a sudden change places? Think you that they would

hesitate to obey Him? Or what if He "calleth for the waters of the Sea,

and _poureth them out upon the face of the Earth_[280]?"--Then further,

if I believe, (as I do believe,) that when the Jews crucified the LORD

of Glory "there was darkness over all the land" from the sixth hour unto

the ninth[281];--nay, that when "Moses stretched forth his hand toward

Heaven, there was a thick darkness in all the land of Egypt," even

darkness which might be felt, for three whole days[282]:--more than

_that_; if I believe, (as I _do_ believe,) the solemn prediction of my

LORD, that at the consummation of all things, "The Sun shall be

darkened, and the Moon shall not give her light, and the Stars shall

fall from Heaven[283]:"--shall it move me to incredulity, if God tells

me, that six thousand years ago it was His Divine pleasure that the same

phenomenon should prevail for a season? Surely,--(I say to

myself,)--surely this is He "which removeth the mountains, and they know

not: which shaketh the Earth out of her place, and the pillars thereof

tremble. _Which commandeth the Sun, and it riseth not; and sealeth up

the Stars[284]!_"

1. But it was now GOD'S pleasure to bring Beauty out of Chaos, and to

establish a fresh order of things upon the surface of our Earth. And, as

the first step thereto, "the SPIRIT of GOD moved upon the face of the

waters." The Hebrew phrase implies no less than the tremulous brooding

as of a bird,--causing the dreary waste to heave and swell with coming

life. "And GOD said, Let there be Light. And there was Light." "He spake

and it was done[285]." From Himself, who is "the true Light," (not from

the Sun, which,--like the rest of the orbs of Heaven,--is but a lamp of

His kindling);--from Himself, I say, a ray of Light went forth; and

_that_ is why He was pleased to praise it. Look through the chapter, and

you will find that it is the only one of His creatures of which it is

specially said that "GOD saw that it was good[286]." ... Thus, one

hemisphere was illumined,--whereby "GOD divided the light from the

darkness;" and when the Earth had completed a single revolution, there

had been a Day and there had been a Night,--so named by the Word of

GOD: "and the evening and the morning were the first Day[287]." ... Do

you see any impossibility so far? I, certainly, see none. It does not

seem to me absurd that "the Light of the world[288]," "dwelling in the

light which no man can approach unto[289]," should cause "the light to

shine out of darkness[290]." We shall perhaps come upon the absurdity by

and by. Let us hasten forward.

2. "And GOD said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters,

and let it divide the waters from the waters." The Hebrew word (_an

expansion_), and the context, shew plainly enough what is meant. The

atmosphere was now created,--whereupon the watery particles either

subsided into sea, or rose aloft in the form of clouds. "And the evening

and the morning were the second Day,"--which is the only day of which it

is not said that GOD saw that it was good.

3. "And GOD said, Let the waters under the Heaven be gathered together

unto one place, and let the dry land appear." Then it was that these

continents were upheaved,--other than those which had been continents

before; and the sea sank into the cavities which had been ordained for

its reception. _Then_, "GOD saw that it was good." The sentence of

approval which had been withheld from the work of yesterday, because

that work, (namely, of dividing the waters from the waters,) was

incomplete,--is freely bestowed to-day. And it may have been to teach us

that no incomplete work is "good," in GOD'S sight.--Next, the Creator

called into being every extant form of vegetable life. So that, instead

of a world of waters, which was all that was to be seen yesterday,--not

only cliffs, and mountains, and bays,--but green hills, and fertile

valleys, and grassy meadows had come to view,--with lakes, and rivers,

and fountains, and falls of water. Again it is written, concerning

Earth's green furniture, "GOD saw that it was good." "And the evening

and the morning were the third Day."

4. "And GOD said, Let there be Lights in the firmament of the Heaven to

divide the day from the night: and let them be for signs, and for

seasons, and for days, and for years." And so it was. Sun, moon, and

stars, came to view[291]; and this globe of ours, no longer illumined,

as, for three days, it had been, rejoiced in the sun's genial light by

day,--and by night in the splendours of the paler planet. And thus was

also gained an easy measure for marking time,--the succession of months

and years, as well as of days. "And GOD saw that it was good." "And the

evening and the morning were the fourth Day."

5. "And GOD said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving

creature that hath life." Thus the inhabitants of the sea and of the air

were called into existence; and it was from the sea that GOD seems to

have commanded that they should derive their being. He saw that it was

good, and He blessed the fish and the winged fowl; "and the evening and

the morning were the fifth Day."

Inspiration and Interpretation Seven Sermons Preached Before the University of Oxford · 第 20 / 39 段