I am at a loss what to say or think about our Parliamentary state. A

certain late Secretary of Ireland,[29] the husband of Polly Jones,

reckons the House of Commons thus: Minister 140, Reynard 90, Boreas

120, the rest unknown, or uncertain. The last of the three, by self

or agents, talks too much of absence, neutrality, moderation. I still

think he will discard the game.

I am not in such a fury with the letter of American independence;[30]

but it seems ill-timed and useless; and I am much entertained with

the Metaphysical disputes between Government and secession about the

meaning of it. Lord Lough[borough] will be in town Sunday sen-night.

I long to see him and Co. I think he will take a very decided part.

If he could throw aside his Gown, he would make a noble Leader. The

East India news are excellent; the French gone to the Mauritius,

Heyder desirous of peace, the Nizam and Mahrattas our friends, and

70 Lack of Rupees in the Bengal treasury, while we were voting the

recall of Hastings.[31] Adieu. Write soon.

E. G.

[28] Lord Howe arrived at Gibraltar early in October. On

September 13 the final effort of the French and Spaniards to

capture the Rock had been repulsed by Sir George Eliott, who

destroyed their floating batteries. Lord Howe returned to

Portsmouth November 15, 1782.

[29] Probably William Eden, who had been secretary to the Earl of

Carlisle during his Lord-Lieutenancy of Ireland. But he married

Eleanor, daughter of Sir Gilbert Elliot, and sister of the first

Earl of Minto. Eden, who was created Lord Auckland in the Irish

peerage in 1789, was advanced to an English peerage in 1793, and

died in 1814.

[30] The reference probably is to the letter which Fox, before

his resignation, wrote to the American agents in Paris, offering

"_to recognize the independence of the United States in the

first instance, and not to reserve it as a condition of peace_."

Fox interpreted this as an absolute recognition of American

independence; Lord Shelburne and his colleagues held that it was

a conditional recognition dependent on peace being concluded.

[31] In September, 1780, Hyder Ali invaded the Madras district;

Warren Hastings at once negotiated peace with the Mahrattas in

order that he might send all available troops to Madras. Sir

Eyre Coote defeated Hyder at Porto Novo (July 1, 1781) and at

Pollilore (August 27). The full Treasury was the result of the

recent overthrow of Cheyte Singh, Rajah of Benares, and the

spoliation of the Begums of Oude. In the summer of 1782 the

House of Commons resolved that it was the duty of the Court of

Directors to recall Hastings. In compliance with this resolution

the directors voted an order of recall, but afterwards rescinded

it and maintained the Governor-General at his post. See note to

Letter 487, on page 85 of this volume.

449.

_To Lady Sheffield._

Bentinck Street, October 31st, 1782.

Although I am provoked (it is always right to begin first) with your

long and unaccountable silence, yet I cannot help wishing (a foolish

weakness) to learn whether you and the two infants are still alive,

and what have been the summer amusements of your widowed and their

orphan state. Some indirect intelligence inclines me to suspect that

the Baron himself has quitted before this time a house of Canvas

for one of brick, and that he enjoys a short interval between the

fatigues of War and those of Government. Should he happen to find

himself in your neighbourhood you may inform him that Hugonin (good

creature) came to town purposely on my business and passed three

hours with me this morning. Harris has resigned his Case of the

conflagration, and either by a sale to Lord Stawell or by a new

Tenant we shall make it rather a profitable affair.

[Sidenote: ENTHUSIASM FOR SIR GEORGE ELIOTT.]

You have doubtless received very accurate accounts of my proceedings

from the Cambridges by which channel I have likewise obtained very

frequent narratives of your life and conversation, and this mutual

Gazette has contributed not a little to stifle the reproaches of my

conscience. In my excursions round the Hampton neighbourhood, I have

often visited and dined with them, and found him properly sensible of

his happyness in the absence of his wife: indeed I never saw a man

more improved by any fortunate event. My campaign, and it has been

a pleasant one, is now closed, but in the time which remains before

the opening of our Pandemonium, I should not dislike to breathe for a

week or ten days the air of Sheffield Place, and as the Lord will be

accessible in town before Christmas, my attack (according to modern

rules) will be chiefly designed for the Lady. About Wednesday or

Thursday next would be the day that I should think of moving, but I

wish to be informed how far such a plan may consist (as the Scotch

say) with other arrangements. Adieu. Is not Elliot[32] a glorious old

fellow? We suspend our judgment of Lord Howe, yet I like the prospect.

I embrace, &c.,

E. G.

[32] Sir George Augustus Eliott, created Lord Heathfield for his

defence of Gibraltar.

450.

_To his Stepmother._

November 7th, 1782.

DEAR MADAM,

Last week I finished my Hampton Court expedition, and think myself

obliged to the person and to the accident which have thrown that

unexpected but not unpleasing variety into my Summer life. I am now

fixed in town till Christmas, or if Lord Sheffield who has quitted

his camp should drag me into Sussex, it can be only for three or four

days.

The Parliamentary campaign is approaching very fast,[33] and a very

singular one it must be from the conflict of _three_ parties, each of

which will be exposed in its turn to the direct or oblique attacks

of the other two. As a matter of curiosity I shall derive some

gratification from my silent seat, but at present I do not perceive

its use in any other light. From honour, gratitude and principle I am

and shall be attached to Lord N., who will lead a very respectable

force into the field, but I much doubt whether matters are ripe for

either conquest or coalition, and the havock which Burke's bill has

made of places, &c., encreases the difficulties of a new arrangement.

However a month or two may change the face of things, and the faces

of men.

[Sidenote: WILLIAM PITT AND MRS. SIDDONS.]

Among those men surely Will Pitt the second is the most

extraordinary.[34] I know you never liked the father, and I have

no connection public or private with the son. Yet we cannot refuse

to admire a youth of four and twenty whom eloquence and real merit

have already made Chancellor of the Exchequer without his promotion

occasioning either surprize or censure.

We are much indebted to your Bath Theatre for Mrs. Siddons:[35]

two years ago, and in the part of Lady Townley, she did not strike

me: but I saw her last night with the most exquisite pleasure. She

gave sense and spirit to a wretched play (the Fatal Marriage), and

displayed every power of voice, action, and countenance to a degree

which left me nothing to wish. To-morrow I promise myself still more

satisfaction from Jane Shore, as the character is more worthy of

her talents. Adieu, Dear Madam. Inform me that the beginning of the

winter has not affected your health. Whatever may be the state of my

namesake, I hope at Christmas to bring you a sound body, and a mind

not dissatisfied with external things, because it is not dissatisfied

with itself.

I am

Ever yours,

E. G.

[33] Parliament, which had been prorogued to November 26, was

further prorogued to December 5, in order that the negotiations

for peace might be completed. Peace was provisionally signed with

the United States at Paris on November 30, 1782.

[34] Pitt's first meeting with Gibbon is thus described by Sir

James Bland Burges, Bart. (_Letters and Correspondence_, pp.

59-61). The dinner was given in Lincoln's Inn to the officers of

the Northumberland Militia, who were quartered in the Inn during

the Gordon Riots.

"I invited the four military gentlemen, our committee, and six

other persons the best qualified I could meet with, among whom

were my father, Lord Carmarthen, and Mr. Gibbon, the historian,

who was then at the zenith of his fame, and who certainly was not

at all backward in availing himself of the deference universally

shown to him, by taking both the lead, and a very ample share

of the conversation, in whatever company he might honour with

his presence. His conversation was not, indeed, what Dr. Johnson

would have called _talk_. There was no interchange of ideas, for

no one had a chance of replying, so fugitive, so variable, was

his mode of discoursing, which consisted of points, anecdotes,

and epigrammatic thrusts, all more or less to the purpose, and

all pleasantly said with a French air and manner which gave

them great piquancy, but which were withal so desultory and

unconnected that, though each separately was extremely amusing,

the attention of his auditors sometimes flagged before his own

resources were exhausted.... He had just concluded, however, one

of his best foreign anecdotes, in which he had introduced some of

the fashionable levities of political doctrine then prevalent,

and, with his customary tap on the lid of his snuff-box, was

looking round to receive our tribute of applause, when a

deep-toned but clear voice was heard from the bottom of the

table, very calmly and civilly impugning the correctness of the

narrative, and the propriety of the doctrines of which it had

been made the vehicle. The historian, turning a disdainful glance

towards the quarter whence the voice proceeded, saw, for the

first time, a tall, thin, and rather ungainly-looking young man,

who now sat quietly and silently eating some fruit. There was

nothing very prepossessing or very formidable in his exterior,

but, as the few words he had uttered appeared to have made a

considerable impression on the company, Mr. Gibbon, I suppose,

thought himself bound to maintain his honour by suppressing such

an attempt to dispute his supremacy. He accordingly undertook

the defence of the propositions in question, and a very animated

debate took place between him and his youthful antagonist, Mr.

Pitt, and for some time was conducted with great talent and

brilliancy on both sides. At length the genius of the young man

prevailed over that of his senior, who, finding himself driven

into a corner from which there was no escape, made some excuse

for rising from the table and walked out of the room. I followed

him, and, finding that he was looking for his hat, I tried to

persuade him to return to his seat. 'By no means,' said he. 'That

young gentleman is, I have no doubt, extremely ingenious and

agreeable, but I must acknowledge that his style of conversation

is not exactly what I am accustomed to, so you must positively

excuse me.' And away he went in high dudgeon, notwithstanding

that his friend [Lord Sheffield] had come to my assistance."

[35] Mrs. Siddons first appeared on the London stage in December,

1775, when she acted Portia at Drury Lane. She gained no great

success, and in June, 1776, received her dismissal from the

managers. In the provincial theatres, and especially at the

Bath Theatre, then managed by Palmer, she became famous. At

Bath, in 1780, she had twice acted the part of Lady Townly in

Vanbrugh's and Cibber's play of _The Provoked Husband_. In 1782

she reappeared in London (October 10) at Drury Lane, in the part

of Isabella in Southerne's tragedy of _The Fatal Marriage_. On

October 30 she took the part of Euphrasia in Murphy's _Grecian

Daughter_. On November 8 she played Jane Shore in Rowe's tragedy

of that name. W. Hamilton's picture of Mrs. Siddons as Isabella

belongs to the nation.

451.

_To his Stepmother._

December 21st, 1782.

DEAR MADAM,

I write a little letter on little paper because I shall soon have

the pleasure of conversing with you in a less laborious manner. Next

Thursday I propose to begin my journey for Bath, but as the times (in

a public and private light) are very _hard_, I shall travel with my

own horses, lye two nights on the road, and reach the Belvidere for a

late dinner Saturday. You will be so good as to secure me a lodging;

the nearness to your house will be its best recommendation, as you

are my sole inducement. If any business should detain me two or three

days longer in town, you may depend on the earliest notice.

I am, Dear Madam,

Ever yours,

E. G.

452.

_To his Stepmother._

Bentinck Street, December 26th, 1782.

DEAR MADAM,

It was not in my power to set out this morning (Thursday), and

therefore I cannot hope to reach Bath Saturday. I am not perfectly

sure whether Sunday or Monday will be the day of my arrival: for

which reason I shall eat a mutton chop at the Devizes, and beg you

would not wait dinner for me.

I am

Most truly yours,

E. G.

453.

_To Lord Sheffield._

Tuesday evening, 1782.

[Sidenote: THE DEARTH OF NEWS.]

*I have designed writing every post.--The air of London is admirable;

my complaints have vanished, and the Gout still respects me. Lord L.,

with whom I passed an entire day, is very well satisfied with his

Irish expedition, and found the barbarous people very kind to him:

the castle is strong, but the volunteers are formidable. London is

dead, and all intelligence so totally extinct, that the loss of an

army would be a favourable incident. We have not even the advantage

of Shipwrecks, which must soon, with the society of Ham[ilton]

and Lady Shelley, become the only pleasures of Brighton. My lady

is precious, and deserves to shine in London, when she regains

her palace. The workmen are slow, but I hear that the Minister

talks of hiring another house after Christmas. Adieu, till Monday

seven-night.* Shall Caplin get you a lodging?

454.

_To his Stepmother._

Bentinck Street, Jan. 16th, 1783.

DEAR MADAM,

I reached London after an easy and pleasant journey, and am now

seated in my library before a good fire, and among three or four

thousand of my old acquaintance. The prospect of my future life is

not _gloomy_: yet I should esteem myself a very happy man indeed, if

every fortnight could be of as pure a white as the last which I have

spent at Bath in the society of the most sincere as well as amiable

of my friends.

I am, Dear Madam,

Ever yours,

E. G.

455.

_To Lord Sheffield._

January 17th, 1783.

*As I arrived about five o'Clock on Wednesday last, we were some

time in town in mutual ignorance. Unlucky enough: yet our loss will

be speedily repaired. Your reason for not writing is worthy of an

Irish Baron. You thought Sarah might be at Bath, because you directed

letters to her at Clifton, near Bristol; where indeed I saw her in

a delightful situation, swept by the winter winds, and scorched by

the summer sun. A nobler reason for your silence would be the care

of the public papers, to record Your steps, words, and actions. I

was pleased with your Coventry oration: a panegyric on the Hertford

family[36] is a subject entirely new, and which no orator before

yourself would have dared to undertake. You have acted with prudence

and dignity in casting away the military yoke,* yet even if I _had_

a right I should try to moderate my indignation. *This next summer

you will sit down (if you can sit) in the long-lost character of a

country Gentleman.

For my own part, my late journey has only confirmed me in the

opinion, that No. 7 Bentinck-street is the best house in the World. I

find that peace and war alternately, and daily, take their turns of

conversation, and this (Friday) is the pacific day. Next week[37] we

shall probably hear some questions on that head very strongly asked,

and very foolishly answered. I embrace, &c. Give me a line by return

of post, and possibly I may visit Downing-street on Monday evening;

late, however, as I am engaged to dinner and cards. Adieu.*

E. G.

[36] The "Hertford family" included Francis, first Earl and

Marquis of Hertford; his brother, General Conway; his eldest son,

Lord Beauchamp, M.P. for Orford; and his youngest son, William

Conway, who was at this time standing at a by-election for

Coventry.

[37] The preliminaries of peace were signed at Versailles with

France and Spain, January 20, 1783, and Parliament met, after the

Christmas recess, January 21.

456.

_To his Stepmother._

Feb. 19th, 1783.

DEAR MADAM,

On Monday or rather Tuesday last we gave the first blow to Lord S.'s

Government by a majority of sixteen in the House of C. on the Peace,

which will be followed by new and decisive attacks.[38] The victory

was obtained by the union of Lord North with Fox and the Rockingham

party.--You would have blamed me for going, or rather being carried,

down with flannels and crutches, and sitting all night till past

eight in the morning: but I have the pleasure of assuring you that

the heat and fatigue have done me no harm, that I have already

changed my two crutches into a single stick, which I hope to throw

away in three or four days. This fit of the Gout, though severe, has

been short, regular, and I think beneficial. Adieu.

I am

Ever yours,

E. GIBBON.

[38] On Monday, February 17, 1783, an address of thanks to his

Majesty for the peace was moved by Thomas Pitt, M.P. for Old

Sarum, and William Wilberforce, M.P. for Kingston-upon-Hull.

Amendments were moved by Lord J. Cavendish and Lord North, which

were carried at 8 a.m. on Tuesday, February 18, by 224 to 208. On

February 21, a resolution, proposed by Lord J. Cavendish, that

the concessions made to the United States were excessive, was

carried by 207 to 190.

457.

_To his Stepmother._

March 29th, 1783.

DEAR MADAM,

[Sidenote: RESIGNATION OF LORD SHELBURNE.]

Will you credit and excuse the cause of my delay? I came home

late and found your letter on my table: meaning to read it the

next morning, I slipt it into my drawer, and till this moment it

escaped my memory and my eye.--I would not bribe you to prefer my

silence, yet you may always take it as an assured proof that the

body Gibbon is in a perfect state of health and spirits, as it is

most truly at the present moment, and since the entire retreat of

my Gout. The state of public affairs is Anarchy without example and

without end,[39] and if the King does not decide before Monday, the

consequences to the House of Commons will be fatal indeed. Every

day produces its own lye, and nothing that is probable is true. Yet

I believe that Pitt will not accept, and that the Coalition must

succeed.

I am, Dear Madam,

Ever yours,

E. GIBBON.

[39] On February 24, 1783, Lord Shelburne resigned office in

consequence of the vote of February 21; and Pitt, as Chancellor

of the Exchequer, publicly stated that he only retained his post

till his successor was appointed. On March 24, Mr. Coke, M.P. for

Norfolk, moved and carried an address to the king, asking for the

appointment of a new administration.

458.

_To his Stepmother._

March 31st, 1783.

DEAR MADAM,

[Sidenote: THE COALITION MINISTRY.]

In my last, written like this in a very great hurry, I used (if I am

not mistaken) an expression which at a distance might alarm you too

much. The _fatal_ Monday is past without any _fatal_ consequences,

yet no Administration is appointed; but as Pitt has formally

resigned,[40] the K. will probably yield without expecting a second

and more serious address on Thursday.--I rejoyce to hear that you

have surmounted your complaint, and hope you will feel every day the

genial influence of the spring.

I am

Ever yours,

E. G.

[40] Pitt, on March 31, resigned the office of Chancellor of the

Exchequer. On April 2 the new administration was formed; the

principal members were--

The Duke of Portland First Lord of the Treasury.

Lord North } Secretaries of State.

Mr. Fox }

Lord J. Cavendish Chancellor of the Exchequer.

Lord Keppel First Commissioner of the Admiralty.

Lord Stormont President of the Council.

Lord Carlisle Lord Privy Seal.

Lord Townshend Master of the Ordnance.

Mr. Burke Paymaster-General.

Lord Northington Lord Lieutenant of Ireland.

The Great Seal was put in commission. The first seven formed the

Cabinet.

Lord Townshend said "he had always foreseen the Coalition

Ministry could not last, for he was at Court when Mr. Fox kissed

hands, and he observed George III. turn back his eyes and

ears just like the horse at Astley's, when the tailor he had

determined to throw was getting on him" (_Correspondence of C. J.

Fox_, vol. ii. p. 28).

459.

_To his Stepmother._

May 5th, 1783.

DEAR MADAM,

My cousin Robert Darrel gave me great pleasure by the information

that he thought you perfectly recovered from your late indisposition.

I depend on his testimony, which removed all my doubts and suspicions

of your giving too favourable an account of yourself. For my own

part, after paying my annual tribute to the gout, I find myself in

the same even course of health and spirits which I have enjoyed for

many years. The business of the house of Commons has been postponed

by waiting first for peace and afterwards for Government; the long

hot days will be crowded, and we shall wrangle with a strong June

sun shining through the windows to reproach our folly.[41] I

have already made one short visit to my Cottage at Hampton Court;

I propose every week to steal away like a Citizen from Saturday

till Monday, and persuade myself that I shall be revived by such

excursions. You express a kind indignation against the persons for

whose sake I acted the devil upon two sticks. Notwithstanding their

apparent neglect I have reason to think them well inclined towards

me, and have even received some assurances, but as every thing that

depends on ministers is precarious and uncertain, I would not raise

too much either your hopes or my own. If any situation[42] permanent

and proper could be obtained, incompatible with a seat in parliament,

I should retire from that Assembly without the least reluctance.

I am, Dear Madam,

Ever yours,

E. G.

[41] The session closed July 16, 1783.

[42] "Gibbon and I," writes Lord Sheffield to William Eden (_Lord

Auckland's Journal and Correspondence_, vol. i. p. 53), "have

been walking about the room and cannot find any employment we

should like in the intended establishment. He agrees with me that

the place of dancing-master might be one of the most eligible for

him, but he rather inclines to be painter, in hopes of succeeding

Ramsay."

460.

_A M. Deyverdun, à Lausanne._

A Londres, ce 20 Mai, 1783.

*Que j'admire la douce et parfaite confiance de nos sentimens

réciproques! Nous nous aimons dans l'éloignement et le silence, et

il nous suffit à l'un et à l'autre, de savoir de tems en tems des

nouvelles de la santé et du bonheur de son ami. Aujourd'hui j'ai

besoin de vous écrire; je commence sans excuses et sans reproches,

comme si nous allions reprendre la conversation familière du jour

précédent. Si je proposois de faire un _compte rendu_ de mes études,

de mes occupations, de mes plaisirs, de mes nouvelles liaisons, de

ma politique toujours muette, mais un peu plus rapprochée des grands

événemens, je multiplierois mes _in quarto_, et je ne sais pas encore

votre avis sur ceux que je vous ai déjà envoyés. Dans cette histoire

moderne, il seroit toujours question de la décadence des empires; et

autant que j'en puis juger sur mes réminiscences et sur le rapport

de l'ami Bugnon, vous aimez aussi peu la puissance de l'Angleterre

que celle des Romains. Notre chute, cependant, a été plus douce.

Après une guerre sans succès, et une paix assez peu glorieuse, il

nous reste de quoi vivre contens et heureux; et lorsque je me suis

dépouillé du rôle de Membre du Parlement, pour redevenir homme,

philosophe, et historien, nous pourrions bien nous trouver d'accord

sur la plupart des scènes étonnantes qui viennent de se passer devant

nos yeux, et qui fourniront une riche matière aux plus habiles de mes

successeurs.

Bornons nous à cette heure à un objet moins illustre sans doute, mais

plus intéressant pour tous les deux, et c'est beaucoup que le même

objet puisse intéresser deux mortels qui ne se sont pas vûs, qui à

peine se sont écrit depuis--oui, ma foi--depuis huit ans. Ma plume,

très paresseuse au commencement, ou plutôt avant le commencement,

marche assez vîte, lorsqu'elle s'est une fois mise en train; mais une

raison qui m'empêcheroit de lui donner carrière, c'est l'espérance

de pouvoir bientôt me servir avec vous d'un instrument encore plus

commode, la langue. Que l'homme, l'homme anglois, l'homme Gibbon, est

un sot animal! Je l'espère, je le désire, je le puis, mais je ne sais

pas si [je] le veux, encore moins si j'exécuterai cette volonté.

Private Letters of Edward Gibbon (1753-1794) Volume 2 (of 2) · 第 2 / 41 段