[Footnote 123: We shall say nothing of sculptured figures taken

from the catacombs, such as the statues of the good shepherd and

S. Hippolitus now in the Vatican, or the numerous bas reliefs on

Christian sarcophagi (on which see Raoul-Rochette, Tableau des

Catacombes, c. IV. Beschreibung der Stadt Rom. B. 2, in the

description of the Christian Museum in the Vatican Library). On

another class of Christian representations the reader may consult

Buonarruoti's _Osservazioni sopra alcuni frammenti di vetro, ornati

di figure_. We shall rather call the attention of the Christian

antiquarian to the numerous frescoes painted in the chapels of the

catacombs, and illustrated by Bosio, Bottari, d'Agincourt etc.,

the latter of whom attributes some of them to the second century on

account of the similarity of their style to that of frescoes in the

tomb of the Nasones, which is situated on the Flaminian way at a short

distance from Rome; his opinion is confirmed by the fact that some of

them have been broken through, with the view of preparing a place of

burial for the bodies of martyrs slain in _subsequent persecutions_.

A list of their subjects which are _generally_ taken from the old and

new Testaments may be seen in Raoul-Rochette (c. 3, p. 157 foll. ed.

de Brusselles). Of these we may briefly notice in particular some of

the representations of Christ, of the B. Virgin, of the apostles and

martyrs. In them Christ sometimes appears as an infant on the lap

of His holy mother, Who ever pure and modest is always veiled; and

this lovely group is found not only on these paintings, but also on

bas-reliefs and glass-vessels generally anterior to the 4th century,

and consequently to the general council of Ephesus held in 431;

although it is pretended that such figures were first designed after

that period. (Instances are enumerated by Raoul-Rochette c. VI).

Constantina, daughter of Constantine, whose tomb is still preserved

at Rome, begged of Eusebius bishop of Cesarea a likeness of our Divine

Saviour (Concil. Labbe. t. VII, 493 seq): we must have recourse to

the catacombs for His most ancient portraits. See one resembling

the ordinary type of His sacred head and taken from the cemetery of

Calixtus, at the end of Raoul-Rochette's work. This type, repeated

again and again on Christian monuments during the last sixteen hundred

years or more, may suggest the hope that some traces of our Divine

Saviour's features are still preserved among us, notwithstanding

the diversity of His portraits, of which S. Augustine complained, De

Triniti l. 8, c, 4 5. Raoul-Rochette's opinion, that this likeness and

the portraits of the apostles were of Gnostic origin, is altogether

unsupported, as the Belgian editors of his work justly observe. Christ

is frequently represented also as seated amid His apostles, of whom

SS. Peter and Paul were favourite subjects of the old artists: see

Raoul-Rochette c. VI, where he mentions, after the older antiquaries,

the ancient representations of S. Ciriaca, S Priscilla, SS. Stephen,

Cyprian, Laurence, Agnes, and other martyrs. During Diocletian's

persecution, the provincial council of Eliberis in Spain decreed, that

there should be no paintings on the walls of churches: its 36th canon

was evidently intended to save sacred pictures from the profanations

perpetrated by the pagans. The faithful however, fertile in

expedients to gratify their devotion, now began to use those portable

representations of pious subjects called diptychs, because they

generally consisted of two tablets which could at pleasure be _folded_

together. They were formed of ivory or wood, and resembled the

presents of that name formerly sent by the consuls on the day of their

entrance into office: on these were usually inscribed the names and

the portraits of the new magistrates. (Symmachus lib. 2, ep. 80, all

71). The sacred diptychs, of which many are preserved in the Vatican

Library, were easily saved from the fury of the Iconoclasts. Their

folding form without their portability is preserved in many of the

ancient altar-pieces of Italian and other churches and from them the

modern altar-pieces are derived: they did not however supersede the

use of frescoes, or mosaics, as is evident from innumerable ancient

and modern ecclesiastical monuments of this city. In the preceding

chapter we laid before our readers the doctrine of the catholic church

concerning respect paid to images, p. 80.]

[Footnote 124: "He is risen; he is not here. But _go, tell_ his

disciples and _Peter_, that he goeth before you into Galilee". Mark

XV, 6 7.]

[Footnote 125: This Hebrew word, which frequently occurs in psalms

of praise, CIV, 34, CV, 45, CVI, 1, etc. has been preserved, as well

as _Amen_, and _Sabaoth_, in its original form in most liturgies.

According to S. Gregory (Ep. 64, ind. 2). who appeals to S. Jerome's

authority, it was introduced into the Roman liturgy in the time of

Pope Damasus. S. Gregory forbade it to be sung at funerals, (as it had

been at that of Fabiola: S. Jerome in Epitaphio Fabiolæ;) or during

Lent.]

[Footnote 126: Gavant and others, following Walafridus Strabo and the

abbot Berno, think that the Offertory and _Agnus Dei_ are not said,

in order to signify the silence of the holy women returning from the

sepulchre (Mark XVI, 8). Others attribute some of these omissions

to the circumstance, that there is no communion; on this day, and

therefore neither offertory or postcommunion; anciently however

communion was given on this occasion, as is evident from the Gelasian

sacramentary (See Bened. XIV, De Festis c. VIII). The kiss of peace,

as Grancolas observes, is not given, because formerly at the dawn of

easter-sunday, soon after the mass of easter-eve, the faithful used to

assemble in the church "and kissing one another with mutual charity to

say, _Surrexit Dominus_ "; (the Lord is risen) Ordo Rom. ab Hittorpio

ed. p. 55. Merati says, that the _Agnus Dei_ is omitted because it

is of recent origin, having been first introduced into the liturgy by

Pope Sergius A.D. 688 (lib. Pont.), whereas the Mass of the day is of

greater antiquity.]

[Footnote 127: Cancellieri says that the music of this _Magnificat_

was composed by Luca Marenzio. Among the compositions prior to

Palestrina, and still sung in the papal chapel, Baini reckons the

Magnificats of Carpentrasso and Morales, as well as the _Te Deum_

and _Lumen ad revelutionem gentium_ of Costanzo Festa.]

[Footnote 128: This basilic, which is the cathedral of the bishop of

Rome, was first erected by Constantine, whose statue taken from his

baths adorns the portico. It was in great part destroyed by fire in

1308; but it was restored by the munificence of the Popes and the

piety of the faithful, emulated in these days, in which we deplore the

burning of S. Paul's. In the gothic tabernacle over the high altar are

preserved the heads of SS. Peter and Paul. The mosaics of the tribune

were made by order of Nicholas IV (A.D. 1278-1292).]

[Footnote 129: This baptistery, as well as the basilica, is attributed

to the time of Constantine; it was reduced to its present state by

Urban VIII; On an ancient and interesting Christian sarcophagus taken

from the Vatican cemetery is represented a basilica with its apsis,

and near it a circular building evidently meant for the baptistery:

this is covered with a cupola surmounted by the monogram of

Christ; and over the gate are curtains drawn up on each side, See

Raoul-Rochette-Tableau des Catacombs, p. 332. The font is an ancient

urn of basalt the paintings above it, between the second order of

columns, representing, the life of S. John Baptist, are by Carlo

Maratta.]

[Footnote 130: In a missal of Pavia it is called a figure of the

column which preceded the Israelites going out of Egypt.]

[Footnote 131: The stag was a favourite subject of the early Christian

artists, who often represented it in their paintings, and afterwards

on their mosaics. The text above quoted explains its signification.]

[Footnote 132: "In most of the old rituals we find that the font was

hallowed with various ceremonies besides prayer. It was customary

to make the sign of the cross, as we learn from the testimony of

Chrysostom, Augustine, and Pseudo-Dionysius". Palmer vol. 2, p. 195.

Martene observes that the rite of pouring chrism into the water

is mentioned in all the ancient Gallican, Ambrosian, and Mozarabic

liturgies. The blessing of baptismal water is reckoned by S. Basil,

in the 4th century, among apostolical traditions. (De Spiritu. S. c.

27).]

[Footnote 133: "Some form of admission to the class of catechumens was

used in all churches at an early period, and it seems most commonly

to have consisted of imposition of hands with prayers for the person.

To this in many places were added various rites, such as, signing the

forehead of the candidate with the cross, the consecration and giving

of salt, which was entitled the sacrament of catechumens, repeated

exorcisms, or prayers and adjurations to cast out the power of Satan,

anointing with oil, and other mystical and figurative rites. In the

course of many ages, when the Christian church had overspread the face

of the world, and infidelity had become in most places extinct, the

form of admission to the class of catechumens was from a veneration

for old customs in many places conjoined to the office of baptism,

and administered at the same time with it to the candidates for that

sacrament whether they were infants or not". Palmer, vol. 2, c. 5,

sect. 1.]

[Footnote 134: "It has been customary in the Christian church from

the most remote period, for the candidates for baptism to renounce the

devil and all his works, before they were admitted to that sacrament.

This renunciation was always followed by a profession of faith in

Christ, as it is now in the English liturgy. The last interrogation

and answer "Vis baptizari, Volo" have long been used in the west.

(Martene de Antiq. Eccl. rit. tom. I, p. 180, 192). According to the

ancient custom of the Roman church, represented in the Sacramentary of

Gregory, the profession of faith occurs between the hallowing of the

water and the administration of the sacrament. This custom has long

been used in the Roman church; since the Sacramentary of Gelasius

(A.D. 494) appointed the confession of faith to be made immediately

before baptism, _though the renunciations were made some hours

before_. In primitive times the sign of the cross was not only made

on the forehead of the elect at the time of baptism, but was used very

often in other ways: this act is probably not more recent than the

apostolical age; and this sign was made in some part of almost every

Christian office. The administration of baptism was succeeded by

various rites in the primitive church; among other the newly-baptised

were clothed in white garments. Formerly also confirmation followed

immediately after baptism". I have extracted the preceding passages

from different sections of Palmer's 5th chapter, vol. 2: coming from a

clergyman of the church of England, they are important admissions, and

they dispense with the necessity of my proving the antiquity of these

various baptismal riles. The reader may see proofs of them collected

in Palmer (loc. cit.) Martene T. 1: cap. 2, etc.]

[Footnote 135: Palmer says, that in confirmation, to the rites of

prayer and imposition, of hands was added "that of anointing with an

unguent or chrism, made of oil and balsam, and hallowed by the prayers

of the bishop.--We learn from the writings of Tertullian and Origen,

that it was already customary both in the east and the west at the end

of the 2nd or beginning of the 3rd century. This chrism was intended

to signify the grace of the Holy Spirit then conferred". Palmer,

Or. Lit. vol. 2, p. 199. If this unction had not been of apostolic

origin, it would not have been customary in all churches at so early

a period.]

[Footnote 136: At S. John Lateran's, when the _Agnus Dei_ is said, the

ancient custom is preserved, which was originally established by Pope

Sergius, of saying _Miserere nobis_ three times, and not _Dona nobis

pacem_, which words were introduced into the liturgy, (according

to Innocent III, De Myst Missæ) about the 10th century, in time of

schism.]

[Footnote 137: Orders are generally conferred on the saturday of each

ember-week, besides the saturday before passion and easter sundays.

A minute detail of the numerous ceremonies of ordination can not be

expected in a work on the ceremonies of holy-week. The reader may find

them all enumerated in the Pontifical, and on their antiquity he may

consult Morinus, De Ordinationibus; Martene, De Ant. Eccl. Rit. t.

2. etc. On the service of holy saturday see the MS. Pontifical of

the Apamean church and various Ordines ap. Martene, lib. IV, c. 24.

Formerly after the mass there was general communion; and at Rome no

Vespers were said (Alcuin), and 7 altars were consecrated.]

[Footnote 138: In the afternoon the parish-priests bless with prayers

and holy water the houses and paschal food of their parishioners.

In the Ordo Romanus, besides the blessing of milk and honey, there

is a formula of benediction of a lamb and other food. Durandus

also (lib. 6 Ration.) mentions the blessing of the lamb, a custom

which is preserved at Rome till the present time. The shops of the

_pizzicaroli_ are illuminated and gaily decorated, probably because

_they_ have peculiar reasons to rejoice at the conclusion of the

_austerities_ of lent.]

[Footnote 139: For the ceremonies of Easter-sunday see The Pontifical

Mass sung at S. Peter's on Easter-sunday etc. By C.M. Baggs. D.D. Rome

1840.]

APPENDIX

PECULIAR CEREMONIES OF HOLY-WEEK AT JERUSALEM

Having spoken of the blessing of the paschal candle at Rome, we may

for a few moments turn our thoughts towards a city still more ancient,

and trodden by holier and more exalted beings than even the apostles

and martyrs of the eternal city. The justly-celebrated traveller John

Thevenot in his Voyage du Levant describes the ceremonies of holyweek

performed at Jerusalem; the distribution of palms, the washing of the

feet on Maunday-Thursday at the door of the holy Sepulchre; and the

procession to the holy places or stations performed by the Catholic

Christians. Concerning this the eloquent Pere Abbé de Geramb, in his

interesting Pelerinage at Jerusalem in 1832, informs us that "by means

of a figure in relief of the natural size, whose head, arms, and feet

are flexible, the religious represent the crucifixion, the descent

from the cross, and the burial of Jesus Christ, in such manner as

to render all the principal circumstances apparent to the senses and

striking".

Both these distinguished writers of different periods agree in

testifying, that all the devotions of the Catholics were and are still

conducted with so much order that they are admired both by Christians

and Turks, whereas those of the schismatical Christians took place

with much confusion, and with such a noise, that the Janissaries, who

had to preserve order, were obliged to strike the persons engaged in

them as well as the spectators. This statement is confirmed by the

account, which they and other travellers give, of the _holy fire_

of the Greeks and other schismatics. Benedict XIV observes that no

mention is made of the supposed miracle of the holy fire by early

Christian writers who lived at Jerusalem; as Eusebius, S. Jerome, S.

Epiphanius, or S. Cyril bishop of Jerusalem. It is however spoken of

by Bernard a Frank monk of the ninth century, and in a Pontifical

of the church of Poictiers of about the tenth century: by Hugo

Flaviniacensis in Chronico Virdunensi, in the discourse of Urban II

in the council of Claremont, and in other documents of the middle

ages mentioned by Martene (lib. IV, c. XXIV). Lupi (tom. 4, Conc. gen.

etc.) thinks it probable, that the custom of burning lights and the

paschal candle on this day was instituted, in order to return thanks

to God for a miracle (which _may_ of old have happened at Jerusalem)

and to announce it to all nations.

I shall now extract a brief account of the scene of confusion enacted

in modern times at Jerusalem on such occasions from Thevenot, in whose

work is a print representing it. "After our Catholic office was ended"

says he, "we prepared to enjoy the sight of the holy fire of the

Greeks, Armenians and Copts, whose priests make their people believe,

that on holy Saturday fire descends from heaven into the holy

Sepulchre, and on that account make each of their pilgrims, who are

very numerous, pay some money. This solemnity appears rather a comedy

or a farce than a church-ceremony, and is very unbecoming in a place

so sacred as the holy Sepulchre. After we had finished our service,

which was about eight in the morning, they, extinguished all their

lamps and those of the holy Sepulchre, and then they commenced their

folly, running round the holy Sepulchre, like mad people, crying,

howling, _et faisans un bruit de diables_; it was charming to see

them running one after another, kicking and striking one another with

cords; many of them together held men in their arms, and going round

the holy Sepulchre, let them fall, and then raised horrible shouts

of laughter, while they who had fallen ran after the others to avenge

themselves: it seemed that both old and young were downright mad. From

time to time they raised their eyes, and stretched their hands, full

of taper, to heaven, crying all together _eleison_, as if they were

wearied at the delay of the holy fire. This scene continued till

towards three in the evening, when two Greek archbishops and two

bishops habited as patriarchs, for the patriarch was not then at

Jerusalem, left their choir with all their clergy, and began

the procession round the holy Sepulchre: they were joined by the

Armenians, four of whom wore mitres: then came a Coptic bishop, with

all his clergy and people. After they had walked three times round the

holy Sepulchre, a Greek priest came out of the chapel of the Angel,

which is close to that of the holy Sepulchre, and gave notice to him

who represented the Patriarch, that the holy fire had descended from

heaven: the latter then entered into the holy Sepulchre, followed

by the representatives of the Armenian patriarch and of the Coptic

bishop. After they had remained there a short time, we saw the Greek

archbishop in an amusing posture, bending down his head, and bearing

in each hand a quantity of lighted tapers. No sooner had he appeared,

than all rushed one upon another to light their tapers from those of

the archbishop; as that is considered the best fire, which is first

lighted. The Janissaries however, who were stationed near the door

of the chapel of the Angel, did not stand with their arms folded, but

made the calpacs and turbans of the Greeks fly from one end of the

church to the other, striking around on all sides with their sticks,

to make way for the poor archbishop, who also as we may suppose

did all in his power to save himself. He then mounted in haste a

stone-altar opposite the entrance of the holy Sepulchre, where he was

immediately surrounded by the people: those also who had lighted their

tapers endeavouring to save themselves were overwhelmed by the others:

the confusion was horrible, and blows were not unfrequent. After the

Greek archbishop has come out, the Armenian appears, and saves himself

from the crowd in the church of the Armenians, and the Copt in that

of the Copts. Every one was in such a hurry to get some of the holy

fire, that in a moment more than 2000 bundles of candles flamed in

the church: and the people, crying out like persons possessed began

greater follies than before. A man carrying a drum on his back began

to run with all his might round the holy Sepulchre, and another

running in the same manner struck it with two sticks; and when he

was tired, another immediately took his place. "_Il semble qu'

on soit dans un enfer, et que ce soient tout autant de diables

déchainès_."--But enough of this unedifying scene, of which the Abbé

Geramb gives a similar account. If we contrast with it the majestic

and edifying ceremonies of the Roman church, we shall feel grateful

to God for having preserved us from such disorders. I shall merely add

from Thevenot, that the Christians are called to office at the holy

Sepulchre by boards struck with iron, as we are for two days in

holy-week: but drums and other instruments are also played there,

which make, he (adds), "une musique enragée".

The distinguished missionary and pilgrim D. Casto Gonzalez recounts

other disorders of the Greeks during Holy Week, and profanations of

the most holy sanctuaries of Palestine. In the year 1833 he exposed,

but not without great risk, the fraud of the "holy fire". On the

holy-Saturday of the Greeks the officiating Bishop accompanied by an

Armenian and a Coptic Bishop and their respective clergy had already

walked thrice round the holy Sepulchre, when the missionary ignited a

match with phosphorus, and holding it up exclaimed "Look, the heavenly

fire has fallen into my hands": he then extinguished it and lighted

it again several times to the great astonishment of the assembled

multitude. He was protected by the Turks from the dangers which

surrounded him. So manifest was the fraud of the pretended "holy fire"

that even the schismatical Armenian patriarch issued a circular letter

forbidding his spiritual subjects to be present at the disgraceful

exhibition.

The Pere Abbé de Geramb gives a glowing account of the Catholic

service and mass on holy saturday; and we most warmly recommend to our

readers the perusal of the 34th _Lettre_ of his _Pelerinage_, in which

he describes all the ceremonies of holy week at Jerusalem, where they

are invested with the peculiar charm arising from spots so sacred,

where Christ suffered, and died, and rose again. Though in other

respects the Roman ceremonies are of a more exalted nature, yet here

must we be contented to transport ourselves in imagination to those

beloved sanctuaries, and to see the _representation_ of the holy

Sepulchre at S. Maria Egiziaca. We shall conclude with the words of

the distinguished writer: "Jamais douleur n'affecta plus vivement mon

àme, que celle qui s'en empara au moment où je m'arrachai pour jamais

de l'église du saint Sepulcre. Taut que je vivrai elle sera aussi

présente à mon esprit que profondément gravée dans mon coeur; toujours

souvenir me fera tressaillir, parce que toujours, et plus qu' aucun

autre souvenir, il me rappellera Jésus, crucifié pour mon salut, pour

la salut du genre humain, à l'amour duquel nous devons repondre par le

plus vif, le plus tendre, le plus absolu de tous les amours; ce Jésus

auquel je dois l'ineffable bonheur de comprendre, de sentir cette

grande verité, que je voudrais faire comprendre et sentir a l'univers

entier, que lui seul est tout, que tout ce qui n'est pas lui, n'est

rien, n'est que neant". Pelerinage à Jerusalem, Lett. 36.

The Ceremonies of the Holy-Week at Rome · 第 10 / 10 段