I.ii.230 (300,6)

all the lands thou hast

Lie in a pitch'd field.

_Alc._ I' defiled land, my lord]

This is the old reading, which apparently depends on a very low quibble.

Alcibiades is told, that _his estate lies in a_ pitch'd _field_. Now

_pitch_, as Falstaff says, _doth defile_. Alcibiades therefore replies,

that his estate lies _in defiled land_. This, as it happened, was not

understood, and all the editors published,

_I defy land_,--

I.ii.237 (301,8) Serving of becks] [W: serring] The commentator

conceives _beck_ to mean the _mouth_ or the _head_, after the French,

_bec_, whereas it means a salutation made with the head. So Milton,

"Nods and _becks_, and wreathed smiles."

To _serve a beck_, is to offer a salutation.

I.ii.238 (301,9) I doubt, whether their legs] He plays upon the word

_leg_, as it signifies a _limb_ and a _bow_ or _act of obeisance_.

I.ii.247 (302,1) I fear me, thou/Wilt give away thyself in paper

shortly] [W: in proper] Hanmer reads very plausibly,

--_thou

Wilt give away thyself_ in perpetuum.

I.ii.235 (302,2) I'll lock/Thy heaven from thee] The pleasure of being

flattered.

II.i.10 (304,5) No porter at his gate;/But rather one that smiles, and

still invites] I imagine that a line is lost here, in which the

behaviour of a surly porter was described.

II.i.12 (304,6) no reason/Can found his state in safety] The supposed

meaning of this [Can sound his state] must be, _No reason_, by

_sounding_, fathoming, or trying, _his state_, can find it _safe_. But

as the words stand, they imply, that _no reason can_ safely _sound his

state_. I read thus,

--_no reason

Can_ found _his state in safety_.--

_Reason_ cannot find his fortune to have any _safe_ or solid

_foundation_.

The types of the first printer of this play were so worn and defaced,

that _f_ and _s_ are not always to be distinguished.

II.ii.5 (305,9) Never mind/Was to be so unwise, to be so kind] Of this

mode of expression conversation affords many examples: "I was always to

be blamed, whatever happened." "I am in the lottery, but I was always to

draw blanks." (1773)

II.ii.9 (306,1) Good even, Varro] It is observable, that this _good

evening_ is before dinner; for Timon tells Alcibiades, that they will

_go forth again as soon as dinner's done_, which may prove that by

_dinner_ our author meant not the _coena_ of ancient times, but the

mid-day's repast. I do not suppose the passage corrupt: such

inadvertencies neither author nor editor can escape.

There is another remark to be made. Varro and Isidore sink a few lines

afterwards into the servants of Varro and Isidore. Whether servants, in

our author's time, took the names of their masters, I know not. Perhaps

it is a slip of negligence.

II.ii.47 (308,4) _Enter Apemantus and a Fool_] I suspect some scene to

be lost, in which the entrance of the fool, and the page that follows

him, was prepared by some introductory dialogue, in which the audience

was informed that they were the fool and page of Phrynia, Timandra, or

some other courtesan, upon the knowledge of which depends the greater

part of the ensuing jocularity.

II.ii.60-66 (309,4) Poor rogues] This is said so abruptly, that I am

inclined to think it misplaced, and would regulate the passage thus:

Caph. _Where's the fool now?_

Apem. _He last ask'd the question._

All. _What are we, Apemantus?_

Apem. _Asses._

All. _Why?_

Apem. _That you ask me what you are, and do not know yourselves. Poor rogues', and usurers' men! bawds between

gold and want! Speak_, &c.

Thus every word will have its proper place. It is likely that the

passage transposed was forgot in the copy, and inserted in the margin,

perhaps a little beside the proper place, which the transcriber wanting

either skill or care to observe, wrote it where it now stands.

II.ii.71 (309,5) She's e'en setting on water to scald] The old name for

the disease got at Corinth was the _brenning_, and a sense of _scalding_

is one of its first symptoms.

II.ii.117 (311,7) with two stones more than's artificial one] Meaning

the celebrated philosopher's stone, which was in those times much talked

of. Sir Thomas Smith was one of those who lost considerable sums in

seeking of it.

II.ii.152 (312,9) Though you hear now, yet now's too late a time]

[Warburton objected to this, an emendation by Hanmer] I think Hanmer

right, and have received his emendation.

Il.ii.155 (313,1) and at length/How goes our reckoning?] [W: Hold good

our] It is common enough, and the commentator knows it is common to

propose interrogatively, that of which neither the speaker nor the

hearer has any doubt. The present reading may therefore stand.

II.ii.171 (314,2) a wasteful cock] [i.e. a _cockloft_, a garret. And a

_wasteful cock_, signifies a garret lying in waste, neglected, put to no

use. HANMER.] Hanmer's explanation is received by Dr. Warburton, yet I

think them both apparently mistaken. A _wasteful cock_ is a _cock_ or

pipe with a turning stopple _running_ to _waste_. In this sense, both

the terms have their usual meaning; but I know not that _cock_ is ever

used for _cockloft_, or _wasteful_ for _lying in waste_, or that lying

in waste is at all a phrase.

Il.ii.187 (314,4) And try the arguments] [_Arguments_ for natures.

_WARB_.] How _arguments_ should stand for natures I do not see. But the

licentiousness of our author forces us often upon far fetched

expositions. _Arguments_ may mean _contents_, as the _arguments_ of a

book; or for _evidences_ and _proofs_.

II.ii.209 (315,5) I knew it the most general way] _General_ is not

speedy, but _compendious_, the way to try many at a time.

II.ii.219 (316,6) And so, intending other serious matters] _Intending_

is _regarding, turning their notice_ to other things.

II.ii.220 (316,7) these hard fractions] [Warburton saw an allusion to

fractions in mathematics] This is, I think, no conceit in the head of

Flavius, who, by _fractions_, means _broken_ hints, _interrupted_

sentences, _abrupt_ remarks.

II.ii.221 (316,8) half-caps] A _half cap_ is a _cap_ slightly moved, not

put off.

II.ii.241 (317,3) I would, I could not] The original edition has, _I

would, I could not think it, that thought_, &c. It has been changed

['Would], to mend the numbers, without authority.

Notes to Shakespeare, Volume III: The Tragedies · 第 86 / 253 题