MINOR EVENTS IN MARCH.
Having briefly narrated in the last chapter the progress of Sir Colin
Campbell’s army in Oude, from the beginning towards the close of March;
it now becomes expedient to watch the operations of those military
officers who, during the same month, were engaged in services in other
parts of India. The achievements were not so great in magnitude or
notoriety, but they do not the less require to be noticed: seeing that
they illustrate the state of feeling among the native population, the
fluctuations of fortune among the rebels, and the struggles of British
officers amid great difficulties.
As in former chapters, there will be a convenience in beginning with the
Calcutta regions, and transferring attention successively to the west,
northwest, and southwest.
The Anglo-Indian capital was shorn of somewhat of its splendour during
the spring months, by the absence of the governor-general at Allahabad;
but in truth this was a secondary matter; for it was not a time for
levees, gaieties, or vice-regal presentations and splendour. Calcutta
experienced a panic so late in the history of the mutiny as the 3d of
March—one of many to which a somewhat excitable population had been
exposed. A telegraphic message was received from Barrackpore, to the
effect that the sepoys of two native regiments at that station—the 2d
and the 23d B. N. I.—were deserting in bodies of ten or twelve; and that
the deserters were supposed to be making their way to Calcutta. The
officers of the volunteer guards were at once requested to send pickets
to certain unprotected buildings in Calcutta. Very speedily these
pickets were told off; cavalry patrolled the streets all night; the
artillerymen remained watchful within the fort; and the English troops
present were kept under arms. The rumour proved to have been greatly
exaggerated, and the suspected danger passed away—but not without
causing much trepidation among the unwarlike portion of the Calcutta
community.
So numerous were the European troops that arrived at Calcutta during the
winter, and so obvious the necessity for increasing the strength of that
branch of the army in India, that preparations were made for
accommodating them within easy reach of the capital. Barrackpore,
although well supplied with sepoy lines, had never held European troops
in large number. It was now resolved, instead of building new European
barracks at that place, to increase those at Chinsura. This town, about
twenty miles from Calcutta, on the banks of the Hoogly, had already a
fine European barrack and military hospital, in a very healthy spot.
About the month of March, many hundred men were set to work, to increase
the barrack accommodation to a level with the wants of five thousand
European troops, and to raze all the buildings within five hundred yards
on all sides, to form parade-grounds, &c.
In the regions north and east of Calcutta, the materials for rebellion
were pretty nearly exhausted. There had from the first been only a small
amount of disturbance in those districts; and it became gradually
evident that the town and village population were desirous of continuing
their peaceful avocations, uninterrupted by mutinous sepoys or fanatical
Mohammedans.
It was in many ways fortunate that the recently acquired province of
Pegu had remained peaceful during the dangerous periods of the mutiny.
Had revolt or treason been at work in that quarter, the embarrassment of
the government would have been seriously aggravated. Disturbances, it is
true, did take place; but they were not of such magnitude as to give
occasion for alarm. This was mainly owing to the policy of the King of
Burmah. We had taken from him a rich province, a slice out of his
empire, by a mingled course of war and politics; and he was no more
likely to be content with that result than any other defeated monarch.
But he was a shrewd observant man; he measured the power of England, and
saw reason to believe that he would weaken rather than strengthen
himself by any hostility at this time. There were not wanting those near
him who urged him to a different policy. Burmah, like other countries,
had its war-party, who kept up a spirit of bitterness towards the
British. This party was headed by the king’s brother, and by many of the
old dispossessed Burman officials of Pegu. There is reason to believe
that, had the strength of the rebels in Oude remained much longer
unbroken, the King of Burmah might have been drawn or driven into
hostility in spite of himself. Whenever news came over from the opposite
side of the Bay of Bengal, the Mohammedans resident in Burmah made the
most of such parts of it as indicated a decline of the English ‘raj,’
and gave strength to a feeling among the Burmese which the king might
not much longer have been able to resist. In the early part of 1857
there were four European regiments in Pegu; but the urgent demands from
India had led to the withdrawal of all these, except a wing of the 2d
Madras Europeans at Toungoo, and a few of H.M. 29th at Thayetmyo; and
even of native Madras troops in Pegu, the number was but small. There
was a time, in the autumn of that year, when the war-party might have
wrought serious mischief to British interests; but when steam-frigates,
corvettes, gun-boats, and regiments from various quarters began to shew
themselves at Rangoon or in the Irrawaddy, or were known to be passing
up the Bay towards Calcutta, the chances were altered. Instead of
fighting, the king did a much wiser thing, whether from humane or from
politic motives—he subscribed ten thousand rupees towards the Mutiny
Relief Fund.
West and southwest of Calcutta, in a part of India very imperfectly
known to Europeans, tranquillity was occasionally disturbed, not so much
by mutinous sepoys, as by ambitious chieftains desirous of strengthening
themselves in a time of anarchy and uncertain allegiance. In the region
around Chyabassa, many petty occurrences from time to time kept the few
Europeans in anxiety. There were not many rebel sepoys in that quarter,
it is true; but, on the other hand, there were few troops of any kind to
aid Captain Moncrieff, the senior assistant-commissioner. A semi-savage
tribe, called Coles or Koles, infested the neighbourhood. On the 25th of
March, three thousand of these Coles, with a medley of guns, muskets,
and native weapons of all kinds, assembled at Chuckerderpore, where
Moncrieff had a small camp of marines and two guns; they were, however,
dispersed by a mere handful of men, and three of their guns taken. This
district was kept in an agitated state mainly by the machinations of a
turbulent chieftain, the Rajah of Porahat.
Let us advance, however, to those regions where the audacity of the
insurgents was more seriously felt—the regions of the Middle Ganges and
the Lower Jumna. The Lower Ganges, between Calcutta and Dinapoor,
remained peacefully in the hands of cultivators and traders, who were
glad enough to be free from the visitations of fighting-men; but from
Dinapoor upwards the sources of discordance were numerous. A few
mutineers lurked about, aided by a much larger proportion of desperate
characters, who took service under chieftains (mostly Mohammedan) bent
upon increasing their own power at the expense of the British.
The Azimghur district, nearly north of Benares, became in March the
scene of a conflict which certainly gave a triumph for a time to the
enemy, although it was favourable to the British in the first instance.
This conflict took place on the 21st at Atrowlia, between a body of
insurgents on the one side, and a small force under Colonel Millman of
H.M. 37th, commandant of the Azimghur field-force. Being in camp at
Koelsa, he received information from Mr Davies, magistrate of Azimghur,
that a considerable body of mutineers was in the neighbourhood of
Atrowlia, a place about twenty-five miles from that city. The colonel
immediately set out, with about 260 infantry, cavalry, and gunners, and
two pieces of ordnance—his troops being British and Madrasses. At
daybreak on the 22d, he espied the enemy—chiefly sepoys of the Dinapoor
brigade, who had followed the fortunes of Koer Singh—posted in several
topes of mango-trees. His infantry of the 37th, his Madras cavalry under
Colonel Cumberlege, and his two guns, speedily discomfited the enemy and
put them to flight; but his day’s work was not ended. While his men were
halting in the neighbourhood of Atrowlia, and breakfast was being
prepared among the topes of trees, news was suddenly brought that the
rebels were advancing in great force. Millman, immediately proceeding
with some skirmishers to ascertain their strength, found them strongly
posted behind a mud-wall, in the midst of topes of trees and
sugar-canes. He sent back orders for his troops to advance; but the
enemy increased in number so rapidly, that he could not contend against
them; he retired slowly from Atrowlia to his camp at Koelsa, followed by
the enemy, who fired at a distance, and endeavoured to turn his flanks.
He made one dash with his cavalry; but news, or at least a rumour,
reaching the camp, that no fewer than 5000 rebels were approaching, such
a panic was created among his camp-followers, that many of the
hackery-drivers left their carts, and all the cooks ran away. The
colonel, perplexed both by his foes and his camp-followers, and
conscious that his camp was untenable in case of a night-attack, and
that adequate supplies would be wanting for his men—deemed it expedient
to retreat to Azimghur, which he did the same day. He was compelled to
abandon a portion of his tents and baggage, which fell into the hands of
the enemy.
This was a vexatious and serious discomfiture. It told unfavourably in
two directions; for while it paralysed the exertions of the few British
officers and troops in that region, it afforded to the rebels an excuse
for vaunting abroad their prowess and success. The natives, inexplicable
in character to Europeans, were often incredulous to rumours of defeat
among their own countrymen; but rumours on the other side spread among
them with astounding rapidity, encouraging them to schemes of resistance
which they might possibly otherwise have avoided.
It was a natural consequence of the withdrawal from Atrowlia, and the
retreat to Azimghur, that the last-named station should itself become
imperiled; for a wide range of country was thus left wholly at the mercy
of Koer Singh and his associates. The British in Azimghur proceeded to
intrench themselves within the jail, which was surrounded by a deep
ditch; and every man was set to work to strengthen the fortifications.
The rebels gradually approached, to the number of four or five thousand;
and then the small garrison was fairly besieged—all the rest of the city
being in the hands of the insurgents. A messenger was despatched to
Benares on the 26th, to announce the state of affairs; but all that the
authorities at that place could do, on the spur of the moment, was to
send fifty dragoons in carts, drawn by bullocks and pushed on by
coolies. A telegraphic message was at the same time sent to Allahabad;
consequent upon which a wing of H.M. 13th foot, and the depôt of the 2d,
started off to Benares, for service at that place or at Azimghur. There
was a rumour that Koer Singh intended to attack Ghazeepore or Benares,
or both, on his way from Azimghur to Arrah; and this rumour led to much
entreaty for aid to the threatened stations.
It will hereafter be seen that Azimghur needed the care of Sir Colin
Campbell. Meanwhile we may notice the state of affairs in a district
somewhat further north.
The neighbourhood of Goruckpore was the scene of a contest early in
March. At that time there were assembled about 200 men of the naval
brigade, under Captain Sotheby, 200 Bengal yeomanry cavalry, 900
Goorkhas, a few Sikhs and four guns—under Colonel Rowcroft. This motley
but stanch garrison was attacked on the 5th in great force by several
influential rebels, who had with them an army of 12,000 men, including
3500 sepoys of mutinied Bengal regiments. Between eight o’clock and
noon, Rowcroft not only defeated this greatly superior force, but chased
the enemy seven miles, nearly to their encampment at Bilwa or Belwar.
The enemy lost 400 or 500 in killed and wounded, eight guns, and much
ammunition. Among the leaders of the rebels were the Nazim Mahomed
Hussein, Rajah Dabie Buksh of Gonda, the Rajah of Churdah, and Mehndee
Ali Hussein, who were all mounted on elephants. This victory was a very
fortunate one; for not only was Goruckpore saved from being a second
time overrun by insurgents, but Colonel Rowcroft received news that many
thousand villagers on the banks of the Gogra were ready to rise in
rebellion if he had been defeated. This kind of peril was constantly
impressed on the minds of the British officers; the consequences of a
disaster were always more than they could safely calculate.
A defeat was experienced by a small force in the Allahabad district
towards the close of March, owing to the want of due information
concerning the position and strength of the enemy. Two companies of H.M.
54th, a hundred Sikhs, a few Madras cavalry, and two guns, went out to
attack some rebels at a place called Suraon, between Allahabad and
Gopeegunje. Insufficiently informed of the locality, the force came
suddenly to a spot surrounded by a jungle, in which a large body of
rebels were concealed. Much to the astonishment of the magistrate of the
district, those rebels possessed six pieces of artillery; a fire was
opened, which wrought much mischief to the British force, and eventually
compelled it to retreat. This was a small affair, but it rendered the
authorities uneasy; for it shewed that within a few hours of Allahabad,
where the governor-general had temporarily taken up his quarters, there
were not only insurgents ready for mischief, but that those insurgents,
in some way and from some source not easily accounted for, had possessed
themselves of artillery.
Jung Bahadoor’s participation in the later stages of the siege of
Lucknow was noticed in the last chapter. He had entered Oude from the
east; and shortly before his junction with Sir Colin, his advanced
division had a sharp engagement with a force of the enemy, which may
briefly be noticed here. Captain Plowden was in charge of this division;
and under him were a few English and many Nepaulese officers, commanding
the Goorkha regiments of which the division consisted. Having received
information that the Nazim Mahomed Hussein, with a force of 4000 men,
intended to dispute the passage of Jung Bahadoor’s army at the road to
Lucknow over the Kandoo Nuddee, Captain Plowden prepared to contest the
matter with him. His division consisted of seven Goorkha regiments,
about 4000 strong, with thirteen guns. On the morning of the 5th of
March, he found the enemy drawn up in detached parties near the bridge;
he opened fire with his guns, and then charged with infantry in line.
His progress was much disturbed by an intervening space of bush-jungle
and deep ravines; nevertheless his Goorkhas charged resolutely, drove
back the enemy at all points, pursued them for two or three miles,
killed 600 of their number, and captured a gun—without losing more than
17 in killed and wounded. Captain Plowden, in his dispatch, told how he
had been aided by the Nepaulese General Khurruk Bahadoor, the two
brigadiers Junga Doje and Run Sing Bahadoor, Colonel Teela Bickrum Singh
Tappah, and other officers whose names present a formidable appearance.
The Nepaulese army pursued its way to Lucknow, and rendered a small
amount of assistance. When their services had terminated at that city,
Jung Bahadoor took a few of the best regiments with him to Allahabad, on
his expedition to an interview with the governor-general; but the main
body of his army marched off _viâ_ Nawabgunge, on the Fyzabad route,
towards the Nepaul and Goruckpore frontier. Whether Jung Bahadoor was
negotiating with Lord Canning concerning the price at which the services
of the Goorkhas were to be purchased; or whether any project was afoot
for transferring some of the Goorkha regiments formally to the British
service—was not made publicly known; but it was understood that the main
Nepaulese force would remain near Nawabgunge until after the interview
between the two great personages.
Of the wildly excited province of Oude, it is scarcely necessary to say
much here. The great event of the month, the siege of Lucknow, has
already been recorded; the other parts of the province were still almost
wholly in the hands of the insurgents. It will, however, contribute
towards an understanding of the state of the province in March, if we
advert to a few facts concerning the temporary occupants of the city of
Lucknow, and the arrangements made by Sir Colin affecting his army.
First, a word or two concerning the soldiery. It would be quite
impossible to say which regiments of the Queen’s army rendered most
service or behaved most valiantly; but the defence of Lucknow had been
so extraordinary in its character, that the government deemed it right
to notice specially the courage and fortitude of the 32d
infantry—Inglis’s main prop during his defence of the Residency from the
1st of July till the arrival of Havelock and Outram near the end of
September. There was put forth an announcement to the effect that ‘her
Majesty, in consideration of the enduring fortitude and persevering
gallantry displayed in defence of the Residency at Lucknow, has been
graciously pleased to command that the 32d be clothed, equipped, and
trained as a light infantry regiment, from the 26th of February 1858.
Her Majesty has also been pleased to command that the word “Lucknow”
shall be borne on the regimental colour of the 32d light infantry, in
commemoration of the enduring fortitude and persevering gallantry
displayed in the defence of the Residency of Lucknow for eighty-seven
days.’ Many of the other royal regiments had borne more fighting in the
open field; but none equalled the 32d in long enduring privation and
heroism, owing to the extraordinary circumstances in which the regiment
had been placed.
Next, concerning the city itself, the place which had undergone so
strange a series of sieges and defences. In Lucknow, after the
recapture, the shopkeepers gradually returned, opened their places of
business, and resumed commercial dealings. Many parts of the city had
been so battered by shot and shell that the buildings were scarcely
habitable; but as this only occurred to a small extent in the trading
streets, there was little interruption on that ground to the return of
the inhabitants. The chief obstacles were—the complicity of many of the
towns-people in the proceedings of the mutineers, and the impoverishment
of others by several days of fighting, anarchy, and plunder. The troops
destined for the defence of the city were quartered in some among the
many palaces, not so much battered by cannonading as the others. A clear
space was formed around the Kaiser Bagh, by the demolition of small
buildings; and operations were made for opening a wide street or avenue
entirely through the city, from the iron bridge to the canal—strategic
precautions, intended to give the garrison control over the city in case
of a turbulent rising. Precautions were in truth still necessary.
Lucknow had contained more ruffians, more desperate characters ready for
any lawless enterprises, than most other cities in India; and the
British authorities felt by no means certain that the lurking-places in
the narrow streets were yet cleared of them. The officers bore in mind,
with regret and resentment, that two of their companions had been
murdered in the city when the siege might have been deemed fairly over.
These two were Lieutenants Cape and Thackwell. They rode from the camp
into the city, but for what purpose was not clearly known to their
companions. They got off their horses, tied them to a doorpost, and went
into a house. It is supposed that budmashes, prowling about, shot them;
but the only certainty is that, when some of the Madras fusiliers went
out to search for them, the headless trunks of the two unfortunate
officers were all that remained to reveal the secret of their fate.
The details given in the last chapter will have rendered evident the
fact that the escape of the rebels from Lucknow after the siege was far
more complete than the English public had expected or wished. How far it
disappointed those immediately responsible, no one but themselves knew.
A secrecy enveloped the plans of the commander-in-chief; he told just so
much as he wished to be known, and kept the rest to himself, or shared
it with the governor-general. Whether foreseen or not, however, the
escape of the rebels was very marked and significant. Sir Hope Grant and
other cavalry leaders endeavoured to check them, but the check was of
small account; in truth, the cavalry were too few for a belt of country
so wide. When the fact became indisputably clear that the main body of
insurgents had got away, the question arose—whither? The camping-grounds
of the fugitive rebels were very imperfectly known to the British
authorities. It was supposed, but on uncertain information, that, at the
end of the month of March, Nena Sahib was at Bareilly, with 2000 men,
and many members of his family; that the Begum of Oude was at Khyrabad,
with nearly 10,000 men; that 2000 more were near Shahjehanpoor; and that
Khan Bahadoor Khan was concocting some scheme of operations with the
Nena, having Rohilcund for its theatre. These were the suppositions,
founded on vague data.
One thing Sir Colin speedily decided on. It was useless to keep a fine
army at Lucknow, while so much serious work had to be done elsewhere. As
already mentioned, he broke up his ‘army of Oude’ into separate
portions. Jung Bahadoor having taken his departure with his nine
thousand Nepaulese, the commander-in-chief proceeded to organise columns
or divisions for special service in various directions. On the 29th of
March Sir Colin issued a general order, pointing to the forthcoming
duties of these portions of the army. The 5th and 78th regiments were to
march from the Alum Bagh to Cawnpore. The artillery at the Alum Bagh was
to be divided, some to return to the camp at Lucknow, the rest to join
the 5th regiment. The troops to be left at Lucknow were to be formed
into a division under Sir Hope Grant. This was to comprise H.M. 20th,
28th, 33d, 53d, 90th, and 93d infantry, the 2d Dragoon Guards, three
Punjaub regiments of horse, and various detachments of artillery and
engineers, with Brigadiers W. Campbell and Barker as subordinate
commanders. Sir Edward Lugard was to form and command a division to be
called the ‘Azimghur Field-force,’ to consist of H.M. 10th regiment,
various detachments of cavalry, artillery, and engineers, and whatever
troops might at that time be in the Azimghur district. The infantry of
this force was to form a brigade under Brigadier Douglas; and the
destination was the district from which the force was named—a district,
as we have lately seen, greatly endangered by the presence of a large
rebel force. Indeed, so urgent was the need for aid in that quarter,
that Lugard started off at once. Another division, for service in
Rohilcund, was placed under the command of General Walpole. It comprised
H.M. 42d, 79th, and 93d infantry, two battalions of the Rifle Brigade,
the 1st Bengal Europeans, two regiments of native infantry, H.M. 7th
Hussars and 9th Lancers, three regiments of Punjaub cavalry, the Naval
Brigade from H.M. steamer _Shannon_, and various detachments of
artillery and engineers. Everything portended that this division would
have hot work before it—hot both in the common and the figurative sense;
for the powerful sun of the month of April would soon pour down on the
heads of the troops; while it was quite certain that Rohilcund contained
a large number of mutinied sepoys, rebel leaders, and desperate men
ready for any deeds of violence and anarchy.
It may here suitably be mentioned, that Sir Colin Campbell’s experience
of Oudian warfare taught him the necessity of caution in all attacks on
the forts with which that province was so fully provided. His officers
would have dashed at them, as at other obstacles; but he forbade
enterprises likely to be followed by losses which good guns might
obviate. On the 24th of March, just when the army of Oude was about to
be broken up, he issued a general order concerning the arrangements to
be made for attacking such strongholds.[152]
Quitting Oude for a time, and transferring attention to the important
and fertile Doab between the Ganges and the Jumna, we shall see that the
month of March found that part of India still much distracted by
fighting and lawless violence. True, Allahabad was in British hands at
one end of it, Delhi at the other, Cawnpore and Agra at intermediate
points; but nevertheless there were numerous bands of rebels roaming
about the open country. Whether two or three of these towns were on
river-banks just beyond the Doab, does not affect the question, which is
not one of mere geographical nomenclature.
The Lower Doab was brought more fully than before within the influence
of military control, by the opening of a further portion of the great
trunk-railway to Futtehpoor, placing that town within a few hours’
distance of Allahabad. This opening took place on the 25th of March;
when Viscount Canning, with nearly all the civil officers of the
last-named city, made the inaugurating journey to Futtehpoor, amid the
holiday accompaniments of flags, triumphal arches, bands of music,
feasting, and speech-making. Further to the northwest, Cawnpore remained
a kind of central point, whence troops could be sent to quarters where
they were most needed. A few regiments only were kept there, sufficient
to guard against sudden surprises. All the British who entered the place
beheld with melancholy interest the cross erected near the terrible well
by the men of the 32d, in memory of the women and children of that
regiment, included among the victims of Nena Sahib.
There was an important town, southwest of Cawnpore, which seemed likely
to be a scene of warfare. During the month of March, it became very
apparent that Calpee was a spot which would speedily require attention
on the part of the military authorities. When Sir Colin Campbell
defeated the Gwalior mutineers at Cawnpore, many weeks earlier, they
fled from that neighbourhood. Rumours spread around that a considerable
portion of the defeated force had fled southwest to Calpee, fortified
themselves there, and called upon the neighbouring zemindars for
supplies of men and money—both of which were forthcoming. The truth of
this rumour, doubtful for a time, became confirmed as the spring
advanced. It was now certain that rebels in great force occupied Calpee,
well supplied with artillery and other munitions of war, and eagerly
watching for a chance of making an attack on Cawnpore—should that
oft-besieged place be left at any time insufficiently guarded. To what
extent Nena Sahib or his brothers were connected with this Calpee force,
was not known. The struggles in and near that town belong to a month
beyond that to which this chapter relates.
The great city of Agra remained peacefully in the hands of the British.
Occasionally, small columns were sent out to attack and disperse bodies
of mutineers who were working mischief in the country districts; but the
formidable brigades of mutinied regiments were not in that quarter. As
one instance; on the 11th of March, Brigadier Showers found it necessary
to chastise some rebels at Bah, in the Agra district. He set forth with
two companies of the 8th foot, 400 of the Sikh police, two guns, a
howitzer, and a mortar; and encountered a motley force of 4000
rebels—comprising three troops of insurgent cavalry, three companies of
infantry, and a body of escaped convicts. These ruffians had assaulted
and captured the town of Bah, plundered all the houses, carried off the
cattle, and murdered some of the wealthier inhabitants. This body of
rebels appeared to have come from the direction of the Gwalior
territories across the Chumbul. Many of their leaders had been in the
civil service of the Company, but turned rebels when they thought
rebellion would be more profitable. Against these men Brigadier Showers
marched from Agra. A strange wild contest ensued. The enemy did not
stand to fight a battle, but made use of ravines, rocks, temples, topes,
and villages as places whence masked attacks might be effected. There
were no roads thereabouts, and Showers experienced much difficulty in
struggling through jungles and ravines.
It was often difficult for the officers in command to muster troops
enough to put down these bands of insurgents. At one period during the
month, Colonel Riddell marched out from Minpooree to aid in intercepting
fugitives from Lucknow. While he was gone, information arrived that
Etawah was threatened by a large body of rebels. No aid being available
from Minpooree, a telegraphic message was sent on to Futteghur
(Furruckabad); and Colonel Seaton immediately ordered a regiment of
Bengal Europeans to march to the threatened spot. These minor operations
were often very harassing to the troops, who had to march great
distances, and wage contests which did not bring them so much glory as a
regular siege or a great battle. Officers naturally preferred those
battle-fields which would bring their names in honourable form into the
official gazettes; and private soldiers those which might earn for some
of them the Victoria Cross; but many weary months passed over some of
the corps, during which the troops were engaged in harassing pursuit of
marauders and ruffians whom they heartily despised, and to conquer whom
brought them very little increase of military reputation.
Speaking generally, it may be said that, at the end of March, the
efforts made by the British officers in the Doab were directed chiefly
to prevent the escape of rebels across the Ganges from Oude. One small
force was watching to this intent at and near Cawnpore; another was in
the Minpooree district; a third was marching down the road from Meerut
to Futteghur; while two others, under Chamberlain and Coke, were
endeavouring to control the Gangetic valley between Futteghur and
Roorkee.
Further to the northwest, the region around Delhi was nearly all in
British hands, and the city itself wholly so—all the mutinous regiments
being far away. The authorities, after Delhi had remained several months
peacefully in their hands, resolved on the formation of a camel corps,
under a peculiar system of organisation. It was completed by the end of
March, by a native named Lalla Jotee Pershaud, under the superintendence
of Captain Chalmers, assistant commissary-general. The camels, 400 in
number, were selected with great care, in the Bikaneer district. The
drivers were armed each with a sword and fusil; and each camel was
fitted to carry a European soldier if necessary. The drivers, equivalent
to troopers or cavalry-men, were carefully selected from the natives of
Rajpootana. The purpose in view was to form a corps of armed men capable
of moving with great rapidity to any spot where their services might be
urgently needed. Lalla Jotee Pershaud was a wealthy and influential man;
and it was intended to make the officering of the corps such as would
render it an acceptable compliment to friendly natives of good position.
As to the city itself, no semblance of fighting was presented. The
conquest by Sir Archdale Wilson, half a year before, had been so
complete, that no enemy remained to fight with. The British kept just
sufficient reliable troops in the place to defend it from surprise; but
the authority was mainly transferred to civil commissioners, who
gradually re-established order and reorganised the revenue department.
The old king still resided there, waiting for his time of punishment. A
special tribunal tried and executed a large number of rebels.
A curious struggle of opinions arose on the question—What should be done
with Delhi? Not only within that city itself, but all over India, the
controversy was maintained with much earnestness. The opinions resolved
themselves into three varieties—advocating destruction, decay, and
conservation, respectively. When the city was captured, a very general
desire was expressed, under the influence of fierce indignation, to
destroy the place altogether, leaving not one stone upon another to tell
where Delhi had been—or rather, leaving the stones to tell where Delhi
had ceased to be. The destructives, if these persons may thus be called,
argued that Delhi should be extinguished from the list of cities,
because it was the centre of disaffection, the scene of the first and
worst stroke levelled at British power; that the Mohammedans of India
would ever think they had a national rallying-point, so long as Delhi
remained; and that the destruction of this rallying-point would impress
them with an idea of British power. The place has a charm for native
ears; it is a sign, a symbol, a standard, a flag of nationality, the
memory of which should be effaced, as something dangerous to the future
security of the British ‘raj.’ Delhi, they urged, should be regarded
rather as a dynastic than a commercial capital; everything in it recalls
the past greatness of a race which had just been foremost in mutiny. For
all these reasons—destroy Delhi. Gradually there arose a second party,
who suggested decay rather than destruction. They said: ‘Destroy Delhi,
and it would be perpetually an object of regret to the followers of
Islam; but Delhi decayed would excite only a feeling of contempt. No
tradition of sovereignty could attach to a dirty little village in which
a population of pauper Mussulmans, around the ruins of old palaces,
scrambled for the charity of a contemptuous traveller.’ They recommended
that the European troops at Delhi should be removed to Hansi, where they
might be easily accommodated; that the arsenal should be removed to
Ferozpore; or that an entirely new European city should be built, lower
down the Jumna; and that Delhi should then be left to be supported by
natives alone, burdened by a special taxation as a punishment for
treason—this, it was believed, would gradually rob the city of all its
dignity and importance. But there arose a third party, to which, it was
reputed, no less a personage than Sir John Lawrence belonged, urging the
preservation of Delhi. The grounds for this advice were many and
important. It was pointed out, among other things—that Delhi is
admirably placed, geographically and politically; that its site was
selected by men who looked primarily to the maintenance of power in the
northwestern regions of India; that, as a commercial entrepôt, it is the
point at which the two great streams of Central Asian trade diverge to
Calcutta and Bombay; that, as a military cantonment, the city commands
the Jumna at the best point for crossing the river; that it is the most
central point from which the marauding Goojurs and Meewatties could be
controlled; that the imperial palace would form an admirable fortress,
to be garrisoned by British troops; and that the walls, brought at one
point within a narrower sweep, would keep out plunderers and protect the
magazine.
Whatever was to be the course pursued, Delhi remained, at the period to
which this chapter relates, undestroyed. The city-wall was still
standing, with the breaches hastily earthed up; all the gates had been
closed, except the Cashmere, Lahore, and Calcutta Gates, but none
destroyed; the fractured Cashmere Gate had been replaced by a temporary
wooden barrier; the English church had been painted and repaired; the
college, riddled by cannon and musket balls, had been converted into a
barrack; the magazine remained as poor Willoughby had left it, half
blown up; and the palace had not suffered very materially from the
siege. Concerning the principal street of the city, an eye-witness wrote
as follows: ‘The Chandnee Chowk is the only street we have seen in India
to which the terms of descriptive admiration bestowed on European cities
justly apply. If the traveller does not examine details too minutely,
the cheerful picturesque aspect of the Chandnee Chowk may remind him for
a moment of the Parisian boulevards. In the centre of a spacious street
is a double row of well-grown trees, on either side a broad roadway
flanked by irregular picturesque buildings. But if we speak of this
street as being in 1858 cheerful, we can allude only to its
architectural structure. Neither its associations nor its own present
accompaniments and accessories are other than gloomy. Every house has
been plundered; and the little show of property, as it begins again
under the protection of British bayonets slowly to accumulate, cannot
disguise the ruin which 1857 has created. To a stranger, the population
that flows up and down the shining street would seem large; but to one
who saw Delhi and the Chandnee Chowk before the rebellion, it is but as
the ghost of the former life of the place that moves to and fro. There
is the mosque where Nadir Shah sat and witnessed his great massacre.
There is the Kotwallee or police-station, whereat were exposed the
bodies of murdered Europeans, and afterwards of their murderers the
princes, whom Hodson slew. In front of this building stand now three
large gibbets, whereon have been already justly executed between two and
three hundred of those who joined in the murder and rapine of the 11th
of May, and on which more culprits are destined yet to pay for their
crimes. Everywhere the demeanour of the native population is more than
respectful to the Europeans—it is cringing. Fear possesses every soul.
Never was a conquest more thorough than is for the present that of Delhi
and its neighbourhood by the British. The present disposition of the
native mind in Delhi towards us, of terror and trembling obedience, is
one which no wise man can wish permanently to continue. It is a
disposition, however, which no wise man will deny that it was necessary
temporarily to create, if the mild uniformity of British rule was ever
again to be asserted in Delhi.’ In connection with these observations,
it may be stated that the cringing servility of the natives, so manifest
at Delhi, was by no means so evident in Oude and the Doab. A sullen
haughtiness, or perhaps a fierce vindictiveness, was visible on the
countenances of a very large percentage of those natives with whom the
British came into contact, telling of discontent, or of hostile passion.
[Illustration:
Kootub Minar, near Delhi.
]
Of Rohilcund it is not necessary to say much in this chapter. The
greater part of it still continued, as it had been for nine months, in
the hands of the rebels; and in addition to this, many of the escaped
mutineer regiments from Lucknow had unquestionably directed their steps
to this province, to swell the numbers of those who were in arms against
the British. General Walpole was sent out against them with a powerful
column; what he achieved, we shall see in the proper place.
That part of Rohilcund which constitutes the ‘Hills,’ the group of
healthy hill-stations at the base of the Himalaya, though nearly cut off
from communication with the Jumna regions, maintained itself bravely,
never once falling into the hands of the armed insurgents. Colonel
M’Causland, military commandant in Kumaon, so steadily and watchfully
maintained British interests in that remote hilly province, that he
generally detected hostile machinations in time to frustrate them. He
had chiefly Goorkhas for troops, Rohilcund rebels for opponents; and he
seldom failed to baffle and defeat those rebels, whether his force were
great or small. Early in March he heard that the insurgents had sent a
detachment to collect revenue—that is, to plunder—at Sitargunje, a place
twenty-five miles from his camp at Huldwanee. He determined to surprise
them; and although the success was not so great as he could have wished,
through the unexpected absence of the larger part of the enemy’s force,
still those who were met with were speedily vanquished. He intrusted the
enterprise to Captain Baugh, who commanded the Nepaul Contingent in the
Kumaon brigade. Baugh started off on the evening of the 3d, taking with
him about 220 horse and foot, and two mountain howitzers. To expedite
matters, he mounted his infantry and artillery on elephants; but during
the night his progress was retarded ‘by an elephant carrying one of the
mountain howitzers falling sick.’ Arriving at Sitargunje early in the
morning of the 4th, he found that the main body of rebels had departed
on the preceding day to a village about six miles distant. Most of those
remaining were within the government tehseel, a high building forty or
fifty yards square; and these did not fight; they fell or escaped as
their individual luck determined. Captain Baugh brought away from the
place whatever he thought might be most useful. Finding that the main
body of the insurgents, under Fuzul Huq, numbered not less than 5000
men, with six guns, he did not deem it prudent to march after them with
his little force to Butteree, the village where they were on that day
encamped, about midway between Huldwanee and Bareilly.
The Punjaub and Sirhind continued to be nearly free from anarchy. Yet
there were symptoms which, if left unattended to, might have led to
evil. The 4th regiment Bengal native cavalry, one of the last remaining
links in that fine army, was disarmed and unhorsed at Umballa during the
month of March. After ten months of faithfulness, amid the treachery of
so many of their compatriots, these troopers at length exhibited a
tendency to insubordination, not safely to be overlooked. In the Punjaub
generally the movements of troops were very frequent and rapid, shewing
that the authorities were well on the alert. Wishing to obtain a healthy
military station west of the Indus, the brigadier in command laid the
foundation of Campbellpore—a station named in honour of the
commander-in-chief. This custom was often adopted in India: witness
Jacobabad and Sleemanabad.
One of the most instructive facts brought to light during the wars of
the mutiny, was the ardour with which some of the natives of India
joined in waging battle with others. During the first and second Sikh
wars, the sepoys of the Bengal native army unquestionably fought
heroically against the Sikhs, winning battles in a way that excited the
admiration of their British officers. And now the Sikhs shewed
themselves equally willing to aid the British against the sepoys, and
equally able to vanquish them in the field. Two inferences may
legitimately be drawn from this—that success depended rather on the
British officers than on the kind of troops whom they commanded; and
that the maintenance of an army formed of any one nation in India is not
so safe as the admixture of nationalities, each to act as a check upon
the other. The subject is adverted to in this place, because the month
of March witnessed the return of the Guides to Peshawur, and the honours
that marked that event. It will be remembered[153] that this celebrated
corps, chosen among the Punjaubees for their activity and intelligence,
consisted of two small regiments, one of infantry and one of cavalry;
that they made an extraordinary march of 750 miles, from Peshawur to
Delhi, in the hot weather of June 1857; and that they served most
gallantly in the operations against that city during the autumnal
months. They remained until February in and near Delhi, and then
returned to their native country. Major-general Cotton, commanding in
the Peshawur division, made a point of giving the gallant fellows an
honorary reception. He caused all the troops in the Peshawur cantonment
to be paraded on the 16th of March. On the approach of the Guides to the
parade-ground, the assembled troops saluted and the guns fired; the
major-general delivered an address; a _feu de joie_ and an ordnance
salute of twenty guns followed; and the Guides marched past him in full
military array. Captain Battye, who had commanded the cavalry portion of
the force, was killed almost immediately on the arrival of the Guides at
Delhi; but Captain Daly lived to return. Cotton addressed Daly and his
companions first, welcoming them back to Peshawur; and then he addressed
the Peshawur force generally, telling them of the wonderful march which
the Guides had made nine months before, and of their deeds at Delhi.
‘Within three hours after reaching Delhi, the Guides engaged the enemy,
and every one of their officers was wounded. For nearly four months,
officers and men were almost constantly in action, sometimes twice a
day. They took 600 men to Delhi, and received 200 recruits during the
siege. Not one man deserted to the enemy or from the corps; but no less
than 350 were killed and wounded, and 120 fell to rise no more. I need
not dwell on their separate deeds of valour, their general actions,
their skirmishes, or their single combats; but as a specimen of the
spirit that animated the corps, I will mention that a mere boy, Singh by
name, bore a wounded European soldier out of the battle.’
In connection with this subject, it may be remarked that the personal
character of the British officers has always exercised a very notable
influence over the native troops of India. In Brigadier Hodgson’s
_Opinions on the Indian Army_, an anecdote is related, illustrative of
the power possessed over the sepoys by any commander whose prowess and
genius they had learned to value. A native officer, speaking to him of
events which he had himself witnessed, said: ‘During the campaign
against the Mahrattas, in the year 1804, we made a tremendous forced
march of 54 miles in 30 hours, and surprised Holkar and his cavalry at
Furruckabad, and routed them with great slaughter. We had marched 250
miles in 13 days. The troops had been upon very short commons for some
time; and you, sir, know what a tyrant a hungry belly is. The sepahees
(sepoys) began to be very loud in their grumblings, and expressed their
discontent pretty freely. This was reported. A short time afterwards,
Lick Sahib Bahadoor (Lord Lake) was observed riding past the column
_eating dry pulse_. This fact spread rapidly through the ranks; and from
that moment, not the whisper of a murmur was heard. I believe, sir, had
a man grumbled after that, he would have run the risk of being put to
death by his companions—such was the love and veneration the sepahees
had for Lick Sahib Bahadoor.’
Some of the half-savage mountain tribes of Peshawur and the Afghan
frontier gave occasional trouble; but neither there nor in Sinde were
the authorities prevented from sending reinforcements to the more
troubled provinces. In connection with Sinde, it may be mentioned that
Mr Frere, commissioner of that province, communicated a singular
document to Lord Elphinstone, governor of the Bombay presidency. It was
not directly connected with the mutiny or its instigators; but was
nevertheless deemed important by Mr Frere, as illustrating phases of
Hindoo character concerning which Europeans know so little. The
information was given by Mr Macdonald, deputy-collector of Larkhana, in
his weekly digest under date 20th of March. We transcribe it in a
foot-note.[154]
We may now conveniently turn our attention to Central India—that region,
south of the Jumna, in which Mahrattas and Bundelas were so strong. We
have stated in former chapters that Sir Hugh Rose, a distinguished
Bombay officer, was placed in command of various regiments and
detachments known collectively as the ‘Central India Field-force.’ He
was gradually working his way northward to the notorious city of Jhansi,
defeating rebels everywhere on his road. On the 4th of March, Sir Hugh
Rose was enabled to telegraph the following news, from his camp at
Peeplia: ‘Yesterday, the troops under my command forced the pass of
Mudenpore, after a short but very vigorous resistance. The troops,
British and native, behaved gallantly. The pass is extremely strong, and
the enemy suffered severely. They numbered about 4000 or 5000 Pathans
and Bundelas, and 600 or 700 sepoys of the 52d and other regiments. I
sent Major Orr in pursuit; and he cut up 50 or 60 rebels, of whom a
large proportion were sepoys. The enemy are scattered in every
direction. They have abandoned the little fortress of Seraj, a fort or
arsenal which is the property of the Rajah of Shagurh, in which I shall
have a small force to keep up my communication with Saugor. I am now in
communication with my first brigade (under Brigadier Stuart) at
Chendaree, and this gives me command of the whole of the country up to
Jhansi, with the exception of two or three forts, which I can take.’
About a week later, he sent news to Bombay that the capture of the pass
of Mudenpore—on the line of hills which separated the British district
of Saugor from the little state of Shagurh—and the defeat of the rebels
on the 3d, had produced advantages far exceeding those at first
anticipated by him. The rebels had successively abandoned several
strongholds which they had possessed—first the fort of Seraj, with four
guns, a rude manufactory for powder, shot and shell, carriages and
tents; then the town and fort of Murrowra, with a triple line of
defences; then the town and fort of Multhone; next the pass of Goonah;
then the pass and town of Hurat; and lastly, the fort of Cornel Gurh. As
all the passes had been fortified and barricaded, their precipitate
abandonment by the rebels was fortunate for Sir Hugh. Another result was
the occupation by him of the hitherto independent district of Shagurh;
the rajah having joined the rebels, Sir Robert Hamilton and Sir Hugh
Rose resolved to punish him by ‘annexing’ his small territory, or at
least occupying it until instructions could be received from Calcutta.
Accordingly, on the 10th of March, the British flag was hoisted at
Murrowra, in Shagurh, in presence of Rose’s second brigade, under a
salute of twenty-one guns. The encampment of the brigade at this time
was about twenty-five miles from Jhansi. Rose and Hamilton were well on
the alert; for Balla Sahib, brother of the Nena, was at that time
heading an army of rabble, and levying contributions in various parts of
Bundelcund. What troops this rebel had with him, was not clearly known;
but it was found that the Rajah of Chuanpore had been mulcted by him of
seven lacs of rupees; and the Rajah of Churkaree, resisting a similar
demand, had had his town destroyed by fire, and was compelled to take
refuge in his fort. Mr Carne, British resident in Churkaree, narrowly
escaped capture at the hands of the rebels.
While Rose was thus engaged, Brigadier Stuart, with the first brigade of
the Central India Field-force, was clearing out various rebel haunts in
districts lying southward of Jhansi. On the morning of the 6th of March,
Stuart’s column or brigade set out from his camp near the Chendaree
fort, and marched six or eight miles to Khookwasas, a fort near which a
large body of rebels were assembled. The route being through a thick
jungle nearly the whole distance, the 25th and 86th regiments advanced
cautiously, in skirmishing order. Arriving at a small pass near the
fort, Stuart found that the enemy had barricaded the road, and lined the
hills on either side with matchlockmen. The engineers soon cleared away
the barricades; while a small party of the 86th rushed up the hills and
dislodged the matchlockmen. Shortly afterwards, however, it was
ascertained that the chief body of the enemy had taken up a position
behind the wall of an enclosure about a mile from the fort. The 86th
dashed forwards to gain this enclosure; two of the officers, Lieutenant
Lewis and Captain Keating, climbed to its top before any of their men,
and jumped down into the interior of the enclosure. The troops soon
cleared out the enclosure, and then pursued their operations against the
fort itself. Working his way steadily onwards, defeating and expelling
bodies of insurgents from neighbouring villages, Stuart was at length
enabled, on the 17th, to capture the fort of Chendaree itself. This
place, situated in Malwah, about a hundred miles from Gwalior, is in a
district which was assigned by Scindia in 1844, according to agreement
with the British government, to assist in the maintenance of the Gwalior
Contingent. The fort—consisting of a strong rampart of sandstone,
flanked by circular towers, and crowning a high hill—was in the hands of
insurgents at the date now under notice; and it was Brigadier Stuart’s
duty to capture it. After cannonading on the evening of the 16th, he
formed a practicable breach in the walls, and resolved to take the place
by assault on the following morning. This he did very effectually. The
25th and 86th regiments, by an impetuous rush, carried everything before
them. Captain Keating was severely wounded whilst foremost with the
storming-party. The enemy mostly escaped, on account of the simple
failure of a letter. On the preceding evening, the brigadier received a
message informing him that Captain Abbott was within available distance
with a considerable body of irregular cavalry; and in return a letter
was despatched to Abbott, requesting him to gallop forward and invest
the north side of the fort. This letter did not reach Abbott in time;
and as a consequence, there was no obstacle to the escape of the rebels
northward. All the guns, eight of iron and two of brass, were taken. The
fort was given up to the keeping of one of Scindia’s lieutenants or
soubahs, in friendly relation with the British; and the inhabitants of
the town resumed their peaceful avocations, apparently glad to get rid
of the presence of the rebels.
Stuart’s operations at Chendaree greatly facilitated the advance of Sir
Hugh Rose towards Jhansi. He marched on, with the second brigade of his
Central India Field-force, and reached that blood-stained city on the
21st of March. He gave a sketch of his operations from the 20th to the
25th in the following brief telegraphic form: ‘On the 20th my cavalry
invested as much as possible the fort and town of Jhansi. The next day
the rest of my force arrived. The rebels have fortified the walls of the
town, and, shutting themselves up in the town and fort, have not
defended the advanced position of Jhansi. The ranee has left her palace
in the town, and has gone into the fort. The rebel garrison numbers
about 1500 sepoys, of whom 500 are cavalry, and 10,000 Bundelas, with 30
or 40 cannon. Their position is strong; but I have occupied two good
positions, one a breaching, the other a flanking one. I have been
delayed by the want of a plan of Jhansi, and consequently have been
obliged to make long and repeated reconnaissances. I opened a flanking
fire, vertical and horizontal, yesterday (the 25th), and hope to open a
breaching fire to-morrow, or at latest the next day.’ We shall see in a
later page that Sir Hugh completely succeeded in his assault, early in
April.
The present may be a proper place in which to advert to a matter which
greatly agitated the public mind from time to time, both in England and
India—namely, the conduct of the insurgents towards those of the British
who unfortunately fell into their power. Jhansi was one of the stations
in respect to which horror was most distressingly expressed. The morbid
taste for horrors engendered by the incidents of the Revolt gave rise to
many exaggerations. The terrible news from Delhi, Cawnpore, Jhansi, and
other places, during the early months of the struggle, produced mischief
in two ways; it created a demand for indiscriminate sanguinary
vengeance; and it produced a tendency, not only to believe, but to
exaggerate, all rumours of atrocities as committed by the natives. In
England as well as at Calcutta, controversies almost of a fierce
character arose on these points; the advocates on one side treating it
as a point of honour to believe the tragedies in their worst form; while
those on the other, in bitter terms demanded proof that the rumours were
true. It was extremely difficult to disprove any statements concerning
atrocities committed; for in most cases there were no Europeans left
behind to give trustworthy testimony. Circumstances became known, during
the progress of the military operations, which led to an inference that,
though inhuman slaughter of innocent persons unquestionably took place
soon after Delhi fell into the hands of the insurgents, it was not
preceded by so much of hideous barbarity towards the women and children
as had at first been reported and believed. It also became more and more
evident, as time advanced, that many of the inscriptions on the wall of
the slaughter-room at Cawnpore must have been written _after_ the
departure or death of the hapless persons whose writing they professed
to be, by some one who failed to see the cruelty of the hoax he was
perpetrating. This subject is adverted to in the present place, because
the month of March lightened a little the terrible severity of the story
of Jhansi, one of those which made a distressing impression on the
public mind. It will be remembered[155] that, early in June of the
preceding year, the British at Jhansi, upwards of fifty in number, were
all put to death by the insurgents, acting at the instigation of a
woman, the ranee or chieftainess of Jhansi; the destruction was so
complete, that no European was left to tell the true incidents. Nine
months afterwards, in the month of March, some of the English newspapers
in India gave a detail of revolting indignities said to have been
inflicted on the females of the party at Jhansi—greatly adding to the
distress already felt by the relatives of the murdered persons. Jhansi
had by that time been restored to British rule; and Captain Pinkney,
superintendent of Jhansi, Jaloun, and Chendaree, determined to ascertain
how far the real facts could be got at. After a diligent inquiry in
various quarters, he arrived at a belief that the massacre, however
barbarous, had not been deepened in atrocity by the frightful
circumstances put forth in the newspapers. The truth appeared to him to
be as follows: When the British in the fort were unable longer to hold
out through want of food, they surrendered to the rebels, who swore that
they would spare all their lives. No sooner, however, were the
fort-gates opened, than the rebels entered, bound the men, and took them
as well as the women and children to a place outside the city-walls
called the Jokun Bagh. Here the men were placed in one group, and the
women and children in another. The rebels and the ranee’s armed servants
then murdered all the men, Major Skene being the first cut down by the
jail darogah, one Bukshish Ali. After this the women and children were
put to death with swords and spears. The dead bodies were stripped, and
left two days in the Jokun Bagh, when they were all thrown into a
neighbouring stream. Shortly after the writing of Captain Pinkney’s
report, a letter was sent to the supreme government by Sir Robert
Hamilton, political agent in Central India, in which a few of the facts
were somewhat differently stated. According to his account, when the
unhappy Europeans reached the Jokun Bagh, ‘they were stopped on the
roadside under some trees. They were accompanied by a crowd of mutinous
sepoys, irregular sowars, disaffected police, fanatic Mussulmans, men in
the service of the ranee, inhabitants of the town, and rabble. Here
Bukshish Ali, jail darogah, called out: “It is the ressaldar’s order
that all should be killed;” and immediately cut down Captain (Major)
Skene, to whom he was indebted for his situation under government. An
indiscriminate slaughter of the men, women, and children then commenced;
all were mercilessly destroyed, and their bodies left strewn about the
road, where they remained until the third day, when, by permission of
the same ressaldar, they were all buried in two gravel-pits close by.’
Execrable as this was, it was far less harrowing than the newspaper
narratives which had given rise to the investigation. Captain Pinkney
ascertained that the total number of Europeans thus barbarously murdered
was sixty-seven, of whom just about one half were women and children.
Sir Robert Hamilton caused the ground around the two gravel-pits to be
cleared, and an enclosing wall to be built; he and all the other
officials, on a selected day, attended a funeral-service at the spot,
delivered by the Rev. Mr Schwabe, chaplain to the station; and he also
planned the erection of an obelisk. Strange that India should become the
ground for so many obelisks and crosses erected in memory of Europeans
ruthlessly murdered by natives. One hundred and two years before, in
1756, Suraj-u-Dowlah, after conquering Calcutta from the Company’s
servants, drove a hundred and forty-six adult Europeans, on a sultry
June evening, into a dungeon only twenty feet square; and of those
miserable creatures, a hundred and twenty-three died during the night,
of heat, thirst, pressure, suffocation, and madness. An obelisk was
afterwards set up, to mark this terrible ‘Black Hole of Calcutta.’ And
now, in the middle of the nineteenth century, the English again found
themselves engaged in erecting these damning memorials of native
brutality, at Cawnpore and at Jhansi.
[Illustration:
Obelisk built on the Site of the Black Hole, Calcutta, to commemorate
the Murder of the One Hundred and Twenty-three Englishmen.—From a
Drawing in the India House.
]
Leaving Jhansi and its mournful recollections for a while, we pass over
from the Mahratta territories into Rajpootana; where numerous petty
chieftains kept the territory in a state of much agitation. There were
scarcely any of the mutinied Bengal regiments in that part of India; but
the Kotah Contingent, and other auxiliary corps which had revolted,
sided with some of the chieftains in hostilities against the British. So
far as concerns the operations of the month of March, those of the Kotah
insurgents were the chief that call for attention. We have in former
pages alluded to a ‘Rajpootana Field-force,’ formed of several regiments
sent up from Bombay. The first division of this force set forth from
Nuseerabad on the 10th of March, for service against Kotah. It consisted
of H.M. 95th foot, a wing of the 83d, the 10th Bombay infantry, the
Sinde horse, and some horse and foot artillery. Siege-material of
formidable character accompanied the column; comprising eighteen
field-pieces, of which ten were 8-inch mortars and howitzers, and an
immense supply of ammunition. The second division, that started on the
following day, consisted of H.M. 72d foot, a wing of the 83d, the 1st
Bombay Lancers, a mountain train, Brown’s battery, and an engineering
corps. The 8th Hussars, with detachments of horse and foot artillery,
were afterwards to join the columns. Several of the guns in the
siege-train were drawn by elephants. Brigadier-general Lawrence
accompanied this field-force, but only in a political capacity; the
military command was held by General Roberts. The conquest of Kotah was
looked forward to as a difficult enterprise, not only from the force of
the enemy in men and guns, but from the peculiar position of the town
itself. Kotah is bounded by the deep river Chumbul on one side, and by a
lake on the other; and there was a probability that batteries would have
to be erected on the opposite side of the river. The approach to it by
land from Nuseerabad was also beset by many obstacles. It would be
necessary to traverse the Mokundurra Pass, a long and narrow valley
between two parallel ranges of hills, easily rendered formidable by a
small number of men. It was altogether a larger and more important
operation than the conquest of the numerous petty forts with which
Rajpootana abounded. Many persons in India thought that those forts
might safely be left to themselves; since the hill-chieftains were more
frequently incited by hostility towards each other than towards the
British, and since it was very little better than a waste of power to
pursue them into the wilds and jungles which intersect that part of
India. One favourable circumstance in connection with Kotah was, that
the rajah was faithful, and as much opposed as the British to the
insurgents.
The middle of the month was occupied by the march of Roberts’s force
from Nuseerabad, over a difficult country. Surmounting all obstacles,
the general arrived at Kotah on the 22d of March, and encamped a mile or
two distant, on the north bank of the Chumbul. The rebels were in
possession of the south bank, having with them a powerful array of guns,
many of large calibre. The fort, the palace, and half the city, were
held by the rajah, with Rajpoots and troops from Kerowlie. On the 25th,
a portion of the British, about 300 in number, under Major Heatley,
crossed the river, to aid the rajah at a critical moment. The rebels had
that morning made a desperate attempt to escalade the walls, and drive
the rajah’s troops into their only remaining stronghold, the castle; but
this attempt was frustrated; had it succeeded, the rebels would have
commanded the ferry over the river. Portions of H.M. 83d, and of the
Bombay troops, formed the small force which crossed the river on the
25th. Two days afterwards, 600 men of H.M. 95th, with two 9-pounders,
crossed over. On the 30th General Roberts was able to announce by
telegraph, ‘I this day assaulted the town of Kotah with complete
success, and comparatively trifling loss. No officer killed. The whole
town is in my possession.’ Upwards of fifty guns were captured. The
victory was gained by a clever flank-movement, which turned the enemy’s
position, and rendered their defences useless. This was a point in
tactics which the rebels seldom attended to sufficiently; they
repeatedly lost battles by allowing their flanks to be turned.
Eastward of the Mahratta and Rajpoot territories, there were isolated
bodies of insurgents in the Saugor regions, between the Jumna on the
north and Nagpoor on the south. But General Whitlock, with a field-force
gathered from the Madras presidency, kept these rebels under some
control. His movements, however, scarcely need record here.
The South Mahratta country kept up just so much disturbance as to demand
the vigilant attention of the authorities, without exciting any serious
apprehension. In the month of March there was much of this disturbance,
near the frontier between the two presidencies of Bombay and Madras, at
Belgaum. On the one side, the Bombay government offered a large reward
for the apprehension of three brothers, rebel leaders, Baba Desaee, Nena
Desaee, and Hunmunt Desaee; while the governor of the Madras presidency
put in force a disarming statute on his side of the frontier. One of the
leaders, Hunmunt Desaee, after many contests, was driven, with the wives
and families of others among the insurgents, into a tower on the summit
of a peak in the Coonung range; it was a one-storied structure, with a
ladder leading to an entrance trap-door. Such towers had been used by
the military police in that range, and Hunmunt defended himself here as
long as he could. There were other traitors in this part of the country.
Towards the close of March, Mr Manson, one of the Company’s civil
servants, obtained a clue to a conspiracy in which several natives—Naga
Ramchunder, Balla Bhoplay, Bhow Shrof Chowdry, and others—were
concerned; having for its object the collecting of guns unknown to the
British authorities, and the inciting of other natives to acts of
rebellion. One of these men was the chief of Jamkhundie, one a
money-lender, and two others were Brahmins. The money-lender was
supposed to have assisted the mutineers of Kolapore with pecuniary means
for carrying on their operations. By lodging these mischief-makers in
safe keeping at Belgaum and Satara, preparatory to a trial, the
authorities checked an incipient disturbance.
This little patch of country, inhabited to a considerable extent by the
southern Mahrattas, was the only part of the Bombay presidency south of
the city itself which was in any anxiety concerning the proceedings of
the insurgents. And indeed, northward of the city, there were no
manifestations of rebellion short of the regions around Gujerat and
Rajpootana; where even those who were disposed to be peaceful found
themselves embarrassed and imperiled by the turbulence of their
neighbours. In Gujerat, Sir Richmond Shakespear commenced and steadily
carried on a general disarming of the population; the Guicowar or native
sovereign cordially assisted him, and the two together collected many
guns and thousands of stands of arms. As to the Madras presidency, it
was quite at peace. From Cuttack in the north to Travancore in the
south, there were no rebellious regiments, and few chieftains who
ventured to endanger their safety by disputing the British ‘raj.’ In the
Nagpoor and Saugor territories, belonging rather to the Bengal than to
the Madras presidency, the elements of convulsion surged occasionally,
but not to a very alarming extent. The Nizam’s country was troubled in a
way which shews how desirable it is that orientals should not be tempted
by anarchy or weakness in the governing power. The regular troops were
moderately steady; but the news of mutiny elsewhere excited all the
turbulent elements of the Deccan. Robber chieftains and city ruffians
rose, not so much against the British, as against any who had property
to lose. The town of Mulgate, held by a chieftain who commanded a motley
band of Rohillas and Arabs, resisted the Nizam’s authority for some
time; but it fell, and the leaders were taken prisoner.
This chapter will have shewn that, when the last day of March arrived,
the attention of the military authorities in India was chiefly directed
to those districts which had Azimghur, Bareilly, Calpee, and Jhansi for
their chief cities, and which swarmed with large bodies of rebels ready
to make a desperate resistance. It was left for the months of April and
May to develop the strategic operations against those places.
Notes.
So frequent is the mention, in all matters relating to the local
government of India, of ‘covenanted’ and ‘uncovenanted’ service, and
so peculiar the duties of those covenanted servants who bear or bore
the title of ‘collectors’—that it may be well to sketch briefly the
Company’s remarkable system, so far as it refers to those two
subjects. The collectors and magistrates suffered much and braved
much during the mutiny, owing to their peculiarly intimate relations
with the natives; and their duties deserve on that account a little
attention in the present work. For many reasons it will be
desirable, as in the volume generally, to adopt the past tense in
speaking of this system—bearing in mind, however, that the system
was fully in operation during the mutiny, except when the officials
were actually driven away from their districts.
_’Covenanted’ and ‘Uncovenanted’ Service._—The ‘services’ supported
by the East India Company were of four kinds—civil, military, naval,
and ecclesiastical. The military has already been frequently
noticed; the Company supported a military force of something near
three hundred thousand men, involving various engagements on the one
hand with the British crown, and on the other with native princes.
The naval service was limited to a force of about sixty vessels and
five thousand men, employed chiefly in surveying, coast-guarding,
mail-conveyance, and the prevention of piracy. The ecclesiastical
service, maintained by the Company for their own servants only,
consisted of three Church of England bishops, about a hundred and
forty Protestant clergymen, three Roman Catholic bishops, and about
eighty Roman Catholic priests. The Protestants were liberally
supported; the Roman Catholics simply received a grant, in aid of
larger funds to be derived by them from other quarters. But it was
the civil service that constituted the most remarkable feature in
the Company’s organisation, embracing all the persons engaged in the
collection of revenue or the administration of justice.
The civil service was of two kinds, covenanted and uncovenanted. The
uncovenanted civil servants were very much like _employés_ in other
countries, paid reasonably for their services, but having no
peculiar privileges—no declared provision for life, no claim to
promotion by seniority, no stipulated furlough or leave of absence,
no claimable pension. They comprised Europeans, Eurasians or
half-castes, and natives. Subordinate duties, fiscal and judicial,
were intrusted to them, according to their range of ability and
supposed honesty, as judged by the local governments. The Europeans
in this class were chiefly persons who had gone out to India in some
other capacity, or were sons of officers already in service in
India. The European and Eurasian uncovenanted servants barely
reached three thousand in number. The class was mainly composed of
natives—Mohammedans more generally than Hindoos. The employment of
natives as uncovenanted servants of the Company was commenced by
Lord William Bentinck (1828 to 1835), and steadily increased under
other governors-general: insomuch that the judicial administration
of the lower courts fell almost wholly into the hands of natives.
The humbler offices in the revenue department were also filled by
them. A few of the uncovenanted servants received salaries ranging
from £500 to £800 per annum; but in the greater number of instances
the amount was far lower.
The covenanted servants comprised nominated or favoured persons who,
after receiving a special education in the Company’s seminary at
Haileybury, were subjected to examination in England, and then sent
out to India at the Company’s expense. They entered into a covenant,
prescribed by ancient custom, ‘That they shall obey all orders; that
they shall discharge all debts; and that they shall treat the
natives of India well.’ Until 1853 (when a system of public
competition was established by the charter granted to the Company in
that year), the appointment of persons to this favoured service was
wholly in the patronage of the directors. After a certain amount of
tuition and examination, the young men (’writers,’ as they were
sometimes called) were conveyed to India, where they pursued further
studies, chiefly in oriental languages, at Calcutta, Madras, or
Bombay. While so studying, they received an ‘out-of-employ
allowance.’ At length they commenced employment as ‘assistants’ to
magistrates and collectors in country districts, as soon as they
possessed a certain amount of knowledge of vernacular languages,
criminal law, and revenue law. Their daily duties were partly
magisterial, partly fiscal. After some years’ practice, the
assistant was competent for promotion. He became collector or
magistrate of a district, under regulations differing in the
different presidencies. In Bengal, the offices of judge, magistrate,
and collector were held by three different persons, all
‘covenanted;’ in the other presidencies the offices of magistrate
and collector were held by the same person; in the ‘non-regulation
provinces’ (Punjaub, Nagpoor, Sinde, &c.), all three offices were
held by one person. The local government had a voice in the
selection of persons to fill these offices; but the principle of
promotion by seniority was extensively acted on, and was almost
claimed as a right by the ‘covenanted.’ The salaries paid were very
munificent. The lowest assistant received £500 per annum, and the
amount rose gradually to £10,000 per annum, the salary of a member
of the Supreme Council at Calcutta.
Such were the chief points of difference between the covenanted and
uncovenanted services of the East India Company. It was not so much
a distinction of race, colour, or creed, as a means of favouring
selected persons in England, and of giving those persons a special
education to fit them for civil duties in India.
* * * * *
_Collectors and Collectorates._—We shall next notice in a succinct
way the remarkable duties of such of the covenanted civil servants
as filled the office of collector—especially in those districts
where the collector was also the magistrate. In the Northwest
Provinces, to which the mutiny was mainly confined, the
collector-magistrate of each district was in many matters controlled
by the commissioner of the province in which the district was
situated; but he had in a larger degree than the commissioner an
intimate knowledge of the villages and villagers of India, their
incomes, hopes, fears, wants, and peculiarities; and he became more
deeply involved in anxieties and dangers consequent on the mutiny.
The term ‘collector’ very inadequately expresses the status and
duties of the official so named. So far from being a mere
tax-gatherer, he was a revenue judge, an executive district
authority, with large powers and heavy responsibilities. As
collector and magistrate, he was responsible to two different
departments—to the higher judicial courts for his conduct as a
magistrate, and to the revenue department in all that concerned his
collectorship. He had two sets of assistants, with duties clearly
defined and separated. The magisterial duties being dismissed
without further description, as susceptible of easy comprehension,
we shall dwell only on the collectorship.
The duties of the collector were fivefold. He was collector of
government revenue; registrar of landed property in his district;
revenue judge between landlord and tenant; ministerial officer of
courts of justice; and treasurer and accountant of the district.
None but a man of varied and extensive attainments, united to zeal
and industry, could adequately fulfil so many duties; many of the
great names in the recent years of Indian history are those of men
who laid the foundations for their greatness as collectors. The
districts over which the collectors presided varied greatly in size
and wealth; but in all cases they comprised several thousand
villages each, and yielded revenue varying from one to two hundred
thousand pounds per annum—for the whole of which the collector was
responsible. In the whole of India, the collectorates were somewhat
under a hundred and seventy in number, for the most part identical
with districts, but in a few cases comprising whole provinces newly
annexed; and these collectorates yielded, in 1856, revenue to the
amount of about thirty millions sterling.
The collector-magistrate had generally two assistants, like himself
‘covenanted’ servants of the Company. Besides these there were
‘uncovenanted’ servants, European and native, sufficient in number
for the duties to be rendered. The district was marked out into
sub-districts containing from one to two hundred villages each. The
collector resided at the head-station of the district, with a staff
of clerks, writers, and record-keepers. Each sub-district was under
the revenue management of a responsible native officer, who had
subordinates under him to keep his accounts and conduct the details
of his office. Carrying down the classification still more minutely,
every village in every sub-district had its headman and its native
accountant, who were in intimate correspondence concerning the
revenue of the village.
The chief official of the district, as collector of government
revenue, obtained this revenue mainly from three sources—land-tax,
spirit and drug duty, and stamps. The second and third items were so
small in amount, that many well-wishers of the Company urged the
abandonment of those imposts; and at anyrate only a small share of
the collector’s attention was devoted to them. The land-tax was the
great source of revenue; and until the government of India undergoes
an entire revolution both in spirit and in practice, such must
continue to be the case. So decided was the importance of this tax
compared with all others, that of the thirty millions sterling
raised in 1856, no less than seventeen millions resulted from
land-tax. The land-tax formed the great fund out of which the vast
expenses for the executive government, military and civil, were
mainly paid. Hence the importance of the revenue-collector and his
land-tax duties. The assessment of the land, for the realisation of
the tax, differed in different presidencies, according to the
relations existing between the state, the landowners, the farmers,
and the labourers. In Bengal the revenue was collected in gross from
great and powerful zemindars, the state having little or nothing to
do with the actual cultivators. In Madras no zemindars or great men
were recognised; the state drew the tax from the ryots or
cultivators, each on his own bit of land. In Bombay the Madras
system existed in a modified form. In Oude nothing could be done
till the annexation in 1856, when the peculiar _thalookdaree_
system[156] laid a foundation for many troubles in the following
year. In the Northwest Provinces the assessment depended on the
peculiar village tenures, which had existed from time immemorial,
and according to which the ownership of the soil could not be
interfered with by the state so long as the village paid the
revenue. Great as may have been, and great as were, the differences
between the Hindoo, Mohammedan, and English governments, this
village system maintained its ground century after century. The
tenure of land in these provinces, recognised by the Company as
among those institutions which they wished to respect, were mainly
three in number:
_Zemindaree_—denoting those estates where the property was held
collectively without any territorial division, whether the
owners were one, few, or many.
_Puttidaree_—those estates where the property was partially or
entirely divided, and held separately by the coparceners.
_Bhyacharuh_—estates held by coparcenary communities, where
actual possession had overborne law; it was a kind of
Puttidaree founded on actuality rather than right.
Whichever of these systems prevailed, the Company respected it in
assessing the land-tax; and thus each piece of land was represented
in the tax-books by the name of a particular tax-payer or community
of tax-payers. The actual assessment, the percentage on produce,
depended on circumstances specially ascertained in each district;
but the two guiding principles laid down by the Company, when they
established a revenue-system for the Northwest Provinces were—that
the rate should be light enough to leave a wide margin of profit to
the cultivators; and that it should be fixed without alteration for
a considerable period of years. The collector, knowing how much was
assessed upon every village or every piece of land, was armed with
powers sufficient to enforce payment. Whether the assessment was
‘light’ or not, was a standing controversy between those who
respectively supported the zemindaree, the ryotwaree, and the
village systems. The Company’s advocates generally urged that,
though the ratio of tax to produce seemed heavy, any comparison with
English land-tax would be fallacious; seeing that the villagers and
cultivators in India were not called upon to pay, in addition to
land-tax, any such imposts as excise, tithes, church-rates,
county-rates, poor-rates, or income-tax. The excellences and defects
of the system, however, are not discussed here; we simply describe
the system itself.
The collector, having a definite amount to receive, from a definite
number of villages, represented by a definite number of persons,
could neither increase nor lessen, anticipate nor postpone, the tax,
without special reasons. If a district suffered from drought, the
government often deferred or wholly remitted the tax; but this only
under well-defined circumstances. The collector’s register recorded
all changes in ownership or occupancy by death or private transfer;
and as he knew each year who _ought_ to pay, he was intrusted with
certain powers to enforce payment by imprisonment, distraint of
personal property, annulment of lease, sequestration of profits,
transfer of defaulting share to a solvent shareholder of the same
community, farming of the estate to a stranger, or sale by public
auction.
In most districts, until the time of the Revolt, the collection of
revenue was an easy task, occupying only a portion of the
collector’s thoughts in May and June, November and December. ‘So
complete the machinery,’ said a writer in the _Calcutta Review_, ‘so
prosperous the provinces, so well adjusted the assessment, that the
golden shower fell uninterruptedly; and the collector, who had
without an effort of his own transmitted a royal ransom half-yearly
to the public treasury, was scarcely aware of the financial feat
which he and his subordinates had performed.’ But when a drought, an
inundation, or any great calamity interfered with the growth or
harvesting of the crop, the collector’s duties were most trying and
laborious; seeing that he had to listen to petitions for relief or
delay from hundreds or thousands of villages in his district.
His ordinary duties as a collector of revenue occupied only a
small portion of his time and thoughts. As registrar of landed
property, he kept maps and registers of land, drawn out with a
degree of minuteness scarcely paralleled in any other country in
the world; and these maps and registers were renewed or corrected
annually, to shew the size, position, ownership, and crop of every
cultivated field in the whole district. As revenue judge between
landlord and tenant, he was often called upon to assist the
responsible landowner to collect his rent from the cultivators, or
to assist the cultivator in resisting oppression by the landlord;
it was a duty requiring a knowledge both of law and of revenue
matters. As a ministerial officer of the courts of justice, he had
to put in force, somewhat in the manner of a sheriff, all
decisions of the judge relating to land, transfers of property, or
arrears of land-tax; and his local knowledge often enabled him to
assist the judge in arriving at an equitable decision. As
treasurer and accountant, he took care of the bags of silver coin
in which the land-tax and the other taxes were chiefly paid,
tested and weighed the coin before making up his accounts, paid
monthly stipends to some of the military and civil officers of the
district, kept a minute debtor and creditor account, and
transmitted his accounts and his surplus silver to Calcutta. In
addition to all these duties, the collector, considered as the
European who possessed most knowledge on various subjects in his
district, performed miscellaneous duties scarcely susceptible of
enumeration. ‘Everything that is to be done by the executive, must
be done by him, in one of his capacities; and we find him, within
his jurisdiction, publican [tax-gatherer], auctioneer, sheriff,
road-maker, timber-dealer, enlisting sergeant, sutler, slayer of
wild beasts, wool-seller, cattle-breeder, postmaster, vaccinator,
discounter of bills, and registrar-general—in which last capacity
he has also to tie the marriage-knot for those who object to the
Thirty-nine Articles. Latterly, he has been made schoolmaster of
his district also. Every new measure of government places an extra
straw on the collector’s back. Whatever happens to be the
prevailing hobby, the collector suffers. One day specimens are
called for, for the Exhibitions of London or Paris; the next day,
the cry is for iron and timber for the railway, or poles for the
telegraph.’
[Illustration:
GROUP OF INDIAN ARMS.
1. Matchlock. 2. Head of a Hunting-spear. 3. Potta. 4. Creece. 5.
Knife. 6. Hunting Tulwar. 7. Common Tulwar. 8. Kundeer. 9. Kundeer.
10. Ballagondeeka. 11. Powder-horn. 12. Pouch for balls. 13. Bow.
14. Arrow. 15. Borsee Spear—carried before chiefs, &c. 16. Bottom
end of a Spear. 17. Head of common Spear.
]
-----
Footnote 152:
‘The commander-in-chief prohibits columns from moving to the attack of
forts, whether large or small, without at least two heavy guns, or a
heavy gun and a heavy howitzer. If possible, such columns should
always have mortars also; namely, two 8-inch and two 5½-inch.
Arrangements are to be made by the inspector-general of ordnance to
insure the presence of a proportion of heavy guns, howitzers, mortars,
and cohorns, at all stations where British regiments are quartered.
Wherever there is a possibility of movable columns being organised,
the necessary elephant and bullock draught should be maintained. When
an expedition against a fort is deemed absolutely necessary, and heavy
ordnance cannot be obtained, a special reference is to be made to the
chief of the staff by telegraph. If, however, the station be removed
from the wire, the general officer commanding the division or station
must, of course, exercise a discretionary power; but the
commander-in-chief begs that it may be recollected, as a principle,
that, except in cases of the most absolute necessity, forts are not to
be attacked with light guns only.’
Footnote 153:
Chap. xiv., p. 234.
Footnote 154:
‘A circumstance well worthy of note has taken place during the last
week; it calls for remark, inasmuch as it exposes the peculiar
superstitions of the Hindoo shopkeepers of this country. In the
talooka of Nuseerabad, below the hills which form the western boundary
of Sinde, and not far south of the jaghire of Ghybee Khan, the Sirdar
of the Chandia tribe, there stands the ancient and still important
town of Hamal. It is situated on a mound close to the great Western
Trunk-road, which runs from the town of Dost Allee, in Kumbur, to that
of Gool Mahomed Luggaree; this part of the country is annually flooded
by the hill-torrents, and for this reason all the towns are built on
eminences, and surrounded by strong bunds. About twelve months ago, a
certain shopkeeper of the town went out to his field with his donkey
to work. On returning in the evening he loaded the ass, and was
proceeding homewards, when the animal fell down and died. The Hindoos
of that town consider that if, through any man’s carelessness, the
death of a beast of burden is caused, that man must make a pilgrimage
to the town of Narrainsir, a few miles south of Lucput, in the Runn of
Kutch, and there, shaving his head and performing other numerous
ceremonies, expiate his fault. Consequently, when this unfortunate man
returned home and reported the death of the donkey, he was at once
told that, unless he immediately made the requisite pilgrimage to
Narrainsir, and there expiated his fault, they would neither eat nor
drink with him, nor hold any intercourse whatever with him. As the
poor man thought the ass’s death was in no way brought about by any
fault of his, he appealed to the punchayets (Hindoo juries of five
persons each) of Larkhana, Guerrilla, and Kumbar, other large towns in
the Larkhana district. They returned answer that the punchayet of
Hamal was wrong in its decision, and that they acquitted the man of
all blame as to the cause of the ass’s death. A controversy was at
once raised throughout this part of the country, and it ended in all
the punchayets of the towns of the Katcha country siding with the
punchayet of Hamal, and the punchayets of the towns on the plain near
the river taking part with Larkhana. The dispute came to a climax
during the past week, when the Larkhana punchayet, in the name and
acting for the minor towns near the river, issued a notice that the
Hindoos of these towns would no longer associate with, nor have any
intercourse with those of Hamal, Ghybee Dherah, and other towns of the
Katcha country. This challenge was at once accepted, and the
punchayets of the Katcha country issued a counter-notice, forbidding
all Hindoos of their towns to hold intercourse with those of the
district towns above mentioned; marriages before agreed upon have been
broken off, agencies broken up, partnerships dissolved, and even the
ties of relationship are no longer binding. To such an extent do the
superstitious feelings of these men act upon their social conduct.’
Footnote 155:
Chap. xi., p. 179.
Footnote 156:
Chap. xxi., p. 360.
[Illustration:
Zemindar, Hindoo landowner.
]