Science is that discourse of the mind which derives its origin from

ultimate principles beyond which nothing in nature can be found which

forms a part of that science: as in the continued quantity, that is to

say, the science of geometry, which, starting from the surfaces of

bodies, has its origin in the line, which is the end of the

superficies; and we are not satisfied by this, because we know that the

line terminates in the point, and the point is that which is the least

of things. Therefore the point is the first principle of geometry, and

nothing else can exist either {143} in nature or in the human mind from

which the point can issue. Because if you say that the contact between

a surface and the extreme point of an iron instrument is the creation

of the point, it is not true; but let us say that this point of contact

is a superficies which surrounds its centre, and in the centre the

point dwells. And such a point is not a part of the substance of the

superficies, neither it nor all the points of the universe can, even if

combined,--it being granted that they could be combined,--compose any

part of a superficies. And granted, as you imagined, a whole composed

of a thousand points, if we divide any part of this quantity of a

thousand, we can very well say that this part shall equal its whole;

and this we can prove by zero, or naught, that is, the tenth figure of

arithmetic, which is represented by a cipher as being nothing, and

placed after unity it will signify 10, and if two ciphers are placed

after unity it will signify 100, and thus the number will go on

increasing by ten to infinity whenever a cipher is added, and the

cipher in itself is worth nothing more than naught, and all the naughts

in the universe are equal to one naught alone, in regard to their

substance and value.

[Sidenote: True Science based on the Testimony of the Senses]

9.

Knowledge which is the issue of experience is termed mechanical; that

which is born and ends {144} in the mind is termed scientific; that

which issues from science and ends in manual work is termed

semi-mechanical. But I consider vain and full of error that science

which is not the offspring of experience, mother of all certitude, and

which does not result in established experience, that is to say, whose

origin, middle and end do not pass through any of the five senses. And

if we doubt of everything we perceive by the senses, should we not

doubt much more of what is contrary to the senses, such as the

existence of God and of the soul, and similar matters constantly under

dispute and contention?

And it is truly the case that where reason is lacking it is

supplemented by noise, which never happens in matters of certainty. On

account of this we will say that where there is noise there is no true

science, because truth has one end only, which, when it is made known,

eternally silences controversy, and should controversy come to life

again, it is lying and confused knowledge which is reborn, and not

certainty. But true science is that which has penetrated into the

senses through experience and silenced the tongue of the disputers, and

which does not feed those who investigate it with dreams, but proceeds

from the basis of primary truths and established principles

successively and by true sequence to the end; as, for instance, what

comes under the heading of elementary mathematics, {145} that is,

numeration and measurement, termed arithmetic and geometry, which treat

with the highest truth of the discontinued and continued quantity.

Here there will be no dispute as to whether twice three make more or

less than six, nor whether two angles of a triangle are less than two

right angles, but eternal silence shall ignore all controversy, and the

devotees of the true science will finish their studies in peace, which

the lying mental sciences cannot do. And if thou sayest that true and

established science of this kind is a species of mechanics, because

they can only be completed by the hand, I will say the same of all the

arts, such as that which passes through the hand of the sculptor, which

is a kind of drawing, a part of painting; and astrology and the other

sciences pass through manual operation, but they are mental in the

first place, as painting, which first of all exists in the mind of the

composer, and cannot attain to fulfilment without manual labour. With

regard to painting, its true and scientific principles must be

established: what constitutes a shaded body, what constitutes a primary

shade, a derivative shade, what constitutes light: that is, darkness,

light, colour, size, shape, position, distance, propinquity, motion,

rest, which are comprehended by the mind only, and without manual

labour. And this is the science of painting which remains in the mind

of those who meditate on it, from which {146} issues the work in due

time, and is infinitely superior to the aforesaid contemplation or

science.

[Sidenote: Mechanics]

10.

Mechanics are the paradise of scientific mathematics, because with them

we arrive at the fruits of mathematics.

[Sidenote: Mechanics and Experience]

11.

Experience is indispensable for the making of any instrument.

12.

Proportion is not only to be found in figures and measurements, but

also in sound, weight, time and position, and in whatever power which

exists.

[Sidenote: Reason and Experience]

13.

The power of the projecting force increases in proportion as the object

projected is smaller; the acceleration of the motion increases to

infinity proportionately to this diminution. It would follow that an

atom would be almost as rapid as the imagination or the eye, which in a

moment attains to the height of the stars, and consequently its voyage

would be infinite, because the thing which can be infinitely diminished

would have an infinite velocity and would travel on an infinite course

(because every continuous quantity is divisible to infinity). And this

opinion is {147} condemned by reason and consequently by experience.

Thus, you who observe rely not on authors who have merely by their

imagination wished to be interpreters between nature and man, but on

those alone who have applied their minds not to the hints of nature but

to the results of their experience. And you must realize the

deceptiveness of experiments; because those which often appear to be

one and the same are often different, as is shown here.

[Sidenote: Effects correspond to the Force of their Cause]

14.

A spherical body which possesses a dense and resisting superficies will

move as much in the rebound resulting from the resistance of a smooth

and solid plane as it would if you threw it freely through the air, if

the force applied be equal in both cases.

Oh, admirable justice of thine, thou first mover! thou hast not

permitted that any tone should fail to produce its necessary effects,

either as regards order or quantity. Seeing that a force impels an

object which it overcomes a distance of one hundred arms' length, and

if in obeying this law it meets with resistance, thou hast ordained

that the force of the shock will cause afresh a further movement, which

in its various bounds recuperates the whole sum of the distance it

should have travelled. And if you measure the distance {148}

accomplished by the aforesaid bounds you will find that they equal the

length of distance through which a similar object set in motion by an

equal force would travel freely through the air.

15.

Every action must be caused by motion.

16.

Motion is the cause of all life.

[Sidenote: Of Force]

17.

What is force? Force, I say, is a spiritual virtue, an invisible

power, which by accidental external violence is caused by motion, and

communicated and infused into bodies which are inert by nature, giving

them an active life of marvellous power.

18.

What is force? I say that force is a spiritual, incorporate and

invisible power, which for a brief duration is produced in bodies that

by accidental violence are displaced from their natural state of

inertia.

[Sidenote: Origin of Force]

19.

Force arises from dearth or abundance; it is the child of physical

motion and the grandchild of spiritual motion, and the mother and

origin of gravity. Gravity is confined to the elements of {149} water

and earth, and this force is infinite, because infinite worlds could be

moved by it if instruments could be made by which the force could be

generated. Force, with physical motion, and gravity, with resistance,

are the four accidental powers by which all mortal things live and die.

Force has its origin in spiritual motion, and this motion, flowing

through the limbs of sentient animals, enlarges their muscles, and thus

enlarged the muscles are shrunk in length and contract the tendons with

which they are connected, and this is the cause of the strength in

human limbs. The quality and quantity of the strength of a man can

generate a further force, which will increase in proportion to the

duration of the motions produced by them.

[Sidenote: Aspects of Force]

20.

Gravity, force and casual motion together with resistance are the four

external powers by which all the visible actions of man live and die.

[Sidenote: Of Inertia]

21.

A motion tends to be continuous; a body set in motion continues to move

as long as the impression of the motive power lasts in it.

[Sidenote: Can Man imitate a Bird's Flight?]

22.

The bird is an instrument which operates by mathematical laws, and man

can reproduce all {150} the movements of this instrument, but cannot

attain to the intensity of its power; and can only succeed in acquiring

balance. Thus we will say that such an instrument constructed by man

lacks only the soul of the bird, and the soul of man must counterfeit

the soul of the bird. The spirit in the frame of the bird doubtless

would respond to needs of that frame better than would the spirit of

man, whose frame is different, more especially in the almost insensible

motions of balance; and since we see the bird make provision for the

many sensible varieties of movement, we can conclude by such experience

that man can acquire knowledge of the more markedly sensible of these

movements, and that he will be able to make ample provision against the

destruction of that instrument of which he has made himself the spirit

and the guide.

[Sidenote: Of Inertia]

23.

A natural and continuous motion seeks to preserve its course along the

line of its starting-point, that is to say, let us call starting-point

whatever place in which it varies.

24.

Everything maintains itself by motion. And if it were possible to

describe a diameter of air on the sphere of the earth, like to a well,

which would extend from one superficies to the other, {151} and if a

weighty body were dropped into this well, the body would seek to remain

stationary at the centre, but so strong would be the impetus that for

many years it would prevent it from so doing.

[Sidenote: Transmission of Motion]

25.

Impetus is a virtue created by motion and communicated by the motive

force to the object moved, and this object acquires motion in

proportion to the energy of the impetus.

[Sidenote: Matter is Inert]

26.

No lifeless matter moves of itself, but its motion is caused from

without.

27.

All elements displaced from their natural place seek to return to it,

and more especially fire, water and earth.

28.

All matter universally seeks to maintain itself in its natural state;

hence, water in motion seeks to maintain its course according to the

force by which it is propelled, and if it meets with opposition it

finishes the length of the course it began in a circular and reflex

motion.

[Sidenote: Conception of Energy]

29.

Impetus is the impression of motion conveyed by the motive power to the

object moved. Every {152} impression tends to permanence or seeks to

attain permanence. That every impression seeks after permanence is

proved by the impression made by the sun on the eye which regards it,

and in the impression of sound made by the hammer which strikes a bell.

Every impression seeks after permanence, as is shown in the image of

impetus communicated to the object moved.

30.

A weight seeks to fall to the centre of the earth by the most direct

way.

[Sidenote: In Praise of the Sun]

31.

If you look at the stars, warding off the rays (as may be done by

looking through a small hole made by the extreme point of a fine needle

placed so as almost to touch the eye), they will appear so small as to

seem as though nothing could be smaller; it is owing to their great

distance that they appear so small, for many of them are very many

times larger than the star which is the earth with its water. Now

reflect what appearance this our star must have from so great a

distance, and then consider how many stars might be placed--both in

longitude and latitude--between those stars which are sown in the dark

space. I can never refrain from blaming many of the ancients who said

that the size of the sun was no greater than {153} it appears; among

whom was Epicurus. I believe he founded his reasoning on a light

placed in our atmosphere equidistant from the centre of the earth,

which, to any one looking at it, never appears to diminish in size from

whatever distance it is seen.

32.

I shall reserve the reasons of its size and power for later. But I

greatly marvel that Socrates should have depreciated such a body, and

that he should have said that it resembled an incandescent stone; and

he who opposed him as regards this error acted rightly. But I wish I

had words to blame those who seek to exalt the worship of men more than

that of the sun, since in the universe there is no body of greater

magnitude and power to be seen than the sun. And its light illumines

all the celestial bodies which are distributed throughout the universe;

and the vital spark descends from it, because the heat which is in

living beings comes from the soul, and there is no other centre of heat

and light in the universe, as will be shown later; and it is certain

that those who have elected to worship men as gods--as Jupiter, Saturn,

Mars, &c.--have fallen into a profound error, since even if a man were

as great as our earth, he would have the appearance of a little star,

which appears like a dot in the universe; and moreover these men are

mortal, and decay and corrupt in their sepulchres.

{154}

33.

Epicurus perhaps saw the shadows of columns on the walls in front of

them equal to the diameter of the column which cast the shadow; and

since the breadth of the shadows are parallel from beginning to end he

considered that he might infer that the sun also was directly opposite

to this parallel, and consequently no broader than the column; and he

did not perceive that the diminution of the shadow was insensibly small

owing to the great distance of the sun. If the sun were smaller than

the earth, the stars in a great portion of our hemisphere would be

without light--in contradiction to Epicurus, who says the sun is only

as large as it appears to be.

34.

Epicurus says the sun is the size it seems to be; hence, as it seems to

be a foot in breadth, we must consider that to be its size. It follows

that when the moon eclipses the sun, the sun ought not to appear the

larger, as it does; hence, the moon being smaller than the sun, the

moon must be less than a foot in breadth, and consequently when the

earth eclipses the moon it must be less than a foot by a finger's

breadth; inasmuch as if the sun is a foot in breadth, and the earth

casts a conical shadow on the moon, it is inevitable that the luminous

cause of the conical shadow {155} must be greater than the opaque body

which causes it.

35.

Measure how many times the diameter of the sun will go into its course

in twenty-four hours. And thus we can see whether Epicurus was correct

in saying the sun was only as large as it appeared to be; for as the

apparent diameter of the sun is about a foot, and as the sun would go a

thousand times into its course in twenty-four hours, it would have

travelled a thousand feet, that is, three hundred arms' length, which

is the sixth of a mile. Thus the course of the sun during twenty-four

hours would have been the sixth part of a mile, and this venerable

snail, the sun, would have travelled twenty-five arms' length in an

hour.

[Sidenote: The Sun's Heat]

36.

They say that the sun is not hot because it is not the colour of fire

but whiter and clearer. And the answer to this is that when molten

bronze is hottest it resembles the colour of the sun, and when it is

less hot it has the colour of fire.

37.

It is proved that the sun is by nature hot and not cold, as has already

been stated. If rays of fire play on a concave mirror when it is cold,

the rays refracted by the mirror will be hotter than {156} the fire.

The rays emitted from a sphere of glass filled with cold water, which

are reflected from a fire, will be warmer than the fire. It follows

from these two experiments that the heat of the rays reflected by the

mirror or the sphere of cold water are hot by virtue, and not because

the mirror or the sphere is hot; and in this case it occurs that the

sun, passing through these bodies, heats them by its virtue. And owing

to this they have inferred that the sun is not hot,--which by the

aforesaid experiments has been proved to be exceedingly hot, by the

experiment of the mirror and the sphere, which are cold in themselves,

and reflect the hot rays of the fire and render them hotter, because

the first cause is hot; and the same thing occurs as regards the sun,

which, being hot in itself, and passing through these cold mirrors,

refracts great heat. It is not the light of the sun which gives

warmth, but its natural heat.

[Sidenote: Rays of the Sun]

38.

The rays of the sun pass through the cold region of the air without any

change being effected in their nature, they pass through glasses full

of cold water without suffering change; through whatever transparent

spot they pass, it is as though they passed through so much air.

[Sidenote: Light of the Stars]

39.

Some writers allege that the stars shine of {157} themselves, saying

that if Venus and Mercury did not shine of themselves, when their light

comes between them and the sun they would darken as much of the sun as

they could hide from our eye; this is false, because it is proved that

a dark body placed against a luminous body is enveloped and altogether

covered by the lateral rays of the remaining part of that body, and

thus remains invisible; as may be proved when the sun is seen through

the boughs of a leafless tree at a long distance, the boughs do not

hide any portion of the sun from our eyes. The same thing occurs with

the above-mentioned planets, which, though they have no light in

themselves, do not, as has been said, hide any portion of the sun from

our eyes.

Second proof. They say that the stars shine most brightly at night in

proportion as they are high; and that, if they did not shine of

themselves, the shadow cast by the earth between them and the sun would

darken them, since they would not see nor be seen by the sun. But

these have not taken into consideration that the conical shadow of the

moon does not reach many of the stars, and even for those it does reach

the shadow is diminished to such an extent that it covers very little

of the star, and the remaining part is illumined by the sun.

{158}

[Sidenote: On the Nature of the Moon]

40.

The moon having density and gravity, how does it stand?

41.

i. No very light object is opaque.

ii. Nothing light can remain beneath that which is heavier.

iii. Whether the moon is the centre of its elements or not. And if it

has no fixed position like the earth in the centre of its elements, why

does it not fall to the centre of our elements? And if the moon is not

in the centre of its elements and does not fall, it must then be

lighter than any other element. And if the moon is lighter than the

other elements, why is it opaque and not transparent?

42.

No body which has density is lighter than the air. Having proved that

the part of the moon which shines consists of water which mirrors the

body of the sun and reflects for us the splendour it receives from the

sun, and that if there were no waves in these waters, it would appear

small, but almost as bright as the sun--it must now be shown whether

the moon is a heavy or a light body; if it is a heavy body--admitting

that from the earth upwards with every grade of distance lightness must

increase, so that water is lighter than earth, air is lighter than

water, and {159} fire lighter than air, and so on in succession--it

would seem that if the moon had density, as it has, it must have

gravity, and if it has gravity the space in which it lies could not

contain it, and consequently it would fall towards the centre of the

universe and be joined to the earth, or if not the moon itself, its

waters would fall from the moon and strip it and fall towards the

centre, leaving the moon bare and lustreless; whence, as this could not

happen, as reason would tell us, it is manifest that the moon is

surrounded by its elements, that is to say, water, air and fire, and

thus it sustains itself by itself in that space as our earth is

suspended with its elements in this part of space; heavy bodies act in

their elements there just as other heavy bodies act in ours.

[Sidenote: On the Harmony of the Spheres]

43.

A sound is produced by the movement of the air in friction against a

dense body, and should it be produced by two weighty bodies it is owing

to the atmosphere which surrounds them, and this friction consumes the

bodies, so that it follows that the spheres in their friction, owing to

there being no atmosphere between them, do not generate sound. And if

this friction were a fact, during the many centuries the spheres have

revolved they would be consumed by the immense velocity expended daily;

and even if they produce sound, the sound could not travel, {160}

because the sound caused by percussion under water is scarcely

noticeable, and it would be less than noticeable in the case of dense

bodies. The friction of polished bodies produces no sound, and similar

result would be produced in the contact or friction of the spheres; and

if the spheres are not polished in their contact and friction, it

follows that they are rough.

Again, their contact is not continuous; this being the case a vacuum is

produced, which it has been proved does not exist in nature. Therefore

we conclude that friction would have consumed the ends of each sphere,

and in proportion as a sphere has a greater velocity in the centre than

at the poles, it would be consumed to a higher degree at the centre

than at the poles; and then the friction would cease, and the sound

would cease also, and the spheres would cease to revolve unless one

sphere revolved eastward and the other northward.

44.

Worlds gravitate in the midst of their own elements. The yellow or

yolk of an egg remains in the middle of the albumen without moving on

either side, and is lighter or heavier or equal to this albumen; and if

it is lighter it ought to rise above all the albumen and stop in

contact with the shell of the egg; and if it is heavier it ought {161}

to sink; and if it is equal to it, it can stand at one of the ends as

well as in the centre or below.

[Sidenote: The Earth appears a Star]

45.

The object of my book is to prove that the ocean, with the other seas,

by means of the sun causes our world to shine like the moon and to

appear as a star to other worlds; and this I will prove.

[Sidenote: The Earth a Star]

46.

In your discourse you must prove that the earth is a star like the

moon, and thus you will bear witness to the glory of our universe! And

thus you must discourse on the size of many stars.

47.

How the earth is a star. The earth, in the midst of the sphere of

water which clothes the greater part of it, taking its light from the

sun and shining in the universe like the other stars, shows itself to

be a star as well.

[Sidenote: To prove the Earth a Star]

48.

First of all define the eye; then show how the twinkling of a star

exists really in the eye, and why one star should twinkle more than

another, and how the rays of the stars are born in the eye. Say, that

if the twinkling of the stars were, as it appears to be, really in the

stars, that this {162} twinkling appears to extend in proportion to the

body of the star. The star, therefore, being larger than the earth,

this motion made in an instant of time would in its velocity double the

size of the star. Then prove that the surface of the atmosphere,

contiguous to fire and the surface of fire, where it ends, is the point

in which the rays of the sun penetrate and bear the image of the

celestial bodies which are large when they rise and set, and small when

they are on the meridian.

[Sidenote: Earth not the Center of Universe]

49.

The earth is not the centre of the orbit of the sun, nor the centre of

the universe, but in the centre of its companion elements and united

with them; and if any one were to stand on the moon when the moon and

the sun are beneath us, our earth, with its element of water, would

appear and shine for him just as the moon appears and shines for us.

50.

The earth, shining like the moon, has lost a great part of its ancient

splendour by the decrease of the waters.

51.

Thoughts on Art and Life · 第 8 / 10 段