BOOK XXXVIII

[Sidenote: The siege of Carthage, B.C. 147. Coss. P. Cornelius Scipio

Africanus Aemilianus, C. Livius Drusus.]

[Sidenote: Interview between Hasdrubal and King Gulussa.]

+1.+ Hasdrubal, the general of the Carthaginians, was a vain

ostentatious person, very far from possessing real strategic ability.

There are numerous proofs of his want of judgment. In the first place

he appeared in full armour in his interview with Gulussa, king of

the Numidians, with a purple dyed robe over his armour fastened by

a brooch, and attended by ten bodyguards armed with swords; and in

the next place, having advanced in front of these armed attendants

to a distance of about twenty feet, he stood behind the trench and

palisade and beckoned the king to come to him, whereas it ought to

have been quite the other way. However, Gulussa, after the Numidian

fashion, being not inclined to stand on ceremony, advanced towards him

unattended, and when he got near him asked him “Whom he was afraid of

that he had come in full armour?” And on his answering, “The Romans,”

Gulussa remarked: “Then you should not have trusted yourself to the

city, when there was no necessity for your doing so. However, what do

you want, and what do you ask me to do?” To which Hasdrubal replied:

“I want you to go as our ambassador to the Roman commander, and to

undertake for us that we will obey every injunction; only I beg of you

both to abstain from harming this wretched city.” Then said Gulussa:

“Your demand appears to me to be quite childish! Why, my good sir,

what you failed to get by your embassies from the Romans, who were

then quietly encamped at Utica, and before a blow had been struck,—how

can you expect to have granted you now, when you have been completely

invested by sea and land, and have almost given up every hope of

safety?” To which Hasdrubal replied that “Gulussa was ill informed; for

they still had good hopes of their outside allies,”—for he had not yet

heard about the Mauretani, and thought that the forces in the country

were still unconquered,[249]—“nor were they in despair as to their own

ultimate safety. And above all, they trusted in the support of the

gods, and in what they might expect from them; for they believed that

they would not disregard the flagrant violation of treaty from which

they were suffering, but would give them many opportunities of securing

their safety. Therefore he called on the Roman commander in the name

of the gods and of Fortune to spare the city; with the distinct

understanding that, if its inhabitants failed to obtain this grace,

they would be cut to pieces to the last man sooner than evacuate it.”

After some more conversation of the same sort, these men separated for

the present, having made an appointment to meet again on the third day

from that time.

[Sidenote: Scipio’s scorn of the proposal, B.C. 147.]

[Sidenote: Comparison between Hasdrubal and Diaeus.]

[Sidenote: The selfish and tyrannical conduct of Hasdrubal.]

[Sidenote: He offers Hasdrubal personal security for delivering the

town.]

+2.+ On Gulussa communicating to him what had been said, Scipio

remarked with a laugh: “Oh, then, it was because you intended to

make this demand that you displayed that abominable cruelty to our

prisoners![250] And you trust in the gods, do you, after violating

even the laws of men?” The king went on to remind Scipio that above

all things it was necessary to finish the business speedily; for,

apart from unforeseen contingencies, the consular elections were now

close at hand, and it was only right to have regard to that, lest,

if the winter found them just where they were, another Consul would

come to supersede him, and without any trouble get all the credit of

his labours. These words induced Scipio to give directions to offer

Hasdrubal safety for himself, his wife and children, and ten families

of his friends and relations, and permission to take ten talents of

his private property and to bring out with him whichever of his slaves

he chose. With these concessions therefore Gulussa went to his meeting

with Hasdrubal on the third day, who again came forward with great pomp

and at a dignified step, clothed in his purple robe and full suit of

armour, so as to cast the tyrants of tragedy far into the shade. He

was naturally fat, but at that time he had grown extremely corpulent,

and had become more than usually red from exposure to the sun, so that

he seemed to be living like fat oxen at a fair; and not at all like

a man to be in command at a time of such terrible miseries as cannot

easily be described in words. When he met the king, and heard the offer

of the Consul, he slapped his thigh again and again, and appealing to

the gods and Fortune declared that “The day would never come on which

Hasdrubal would behold the sun and his native city in flames; for to

the nobly-minded one’s country and its burning houses were a glorious

funeral pile.” These expressions force us to feel some admiration for

the man and the nobility of his language; but when we come to view his

administration of affairs, we cannot fail to be struck by his want

of spirit and courage; for at a time when his fellow-citizens were

absolutely perishing with famine, he gave banquets and had second

courses put on of a costly kind, and by his own excellent physical

condition made their misery more conspicuous. For the number of the

dying surpassed belief, as well as the number who deserted every day

from hunger. However, by fiercely rebuking some, and by executing as

well as abusing others, he cowed the common people: and by this means

retained, in a country reduced to the lowest depths of misfortune, an

authority which a tyrant would scarcely enjoy in a prosperous city.

Therefore I think I was justified in saying that two leaders more like

each other than those who at that time directed the affairs of Greece

and Carthage it would not be easy to find. And this will be rendered

manifest when we come to a formal comparison of them....

[Sidenote: The ill-luck which occasioned the fall of Greece.]

[Sidenote: The fall of Greece was even more lamentable than that of

Carthage.]

+3.+ My thirty-eighth book embraces the consummation of the misfortunes

of Greece. For though Greece as a whole, as well as separate parts of

it, has on several occasions sustained grave disasters, yet to none

of her previous defeats could the word “misfortune” be more properly

applied, than to those which have befallen her in our time. For it is

not only that the _sufferings_ of Greece excite compassion: stronger

still is the conviction, which a knowledge of the truth of the several

occurrences must bring, that in all she undertook she was supremely

unfortunate. At any rate, though the disaster of Carthage is looked

upon as of the severest kind, yet one cannot but regard that of Greece

as not less, and in some respects even more so. For the Carthaginians

at any rate left something for posterity to say on their behalf; but

the mistakes of the Greeks were so glaring that they made it impossible

for those who wished to support them to do so. Besides, the destruction

of the Carthaginians was immediate and total, so that they had no

feeling afterwards of their disasters: but the Greeks, with their

misfortunes ever before their eyes, handed down to their children’s

children the loss of all that once was theirs. And in proportion as

we regard those who live in pain as more pitiable than those who lose

their lives at the moment of their misfortunes, in that proportion must

the disasters of the Greeks be regarded as more pitiable than those of

the Carthaginians,—unless a man thinks nothing of dignity and honour,

and gives his opinion from a regard only to material advantage. To

prove the truth of what I say, one has only to remember and compare the

misfortunes in Greece reputed to be the heaviest with what I have just

now mentioned.

[Sidenote: Comparison between the fall of Greece under the Romans with]

[Sidenote: the Persian invasion, B.C. 480.]

[Sidenote: The defeat of the Athenians at Aegospotami, B.C. 405,]

[Sidenote: of the Spartans at Leuctra, B.C. 371.]

[Sidenote: The destruction of Mantinea, B.C. 362,]

[Sidenote: and of Thebes, B.C. 335.]

+4.+ Now, the greatest alarm that fortune ever brought upon the Greeks

was when Xerxes invaded Europe: for at that time all were exposed to

danger though an extremely small number actually suffered disaster. The

greatest sufferers were the Athenians: for, with a prudent foresight

of what was coming, they abandoned their country with their wives and

children. That crisis then caused them damage; for the Barbarians

took Athens and laid it waste with savage violence: but it brought

them no shame or disgrace. On the contrary, they gained the highest

glory in the eyes of all the world for having regarded everything as

of less importance, in comparison with taking their share in the same

fortune as the other Greeks. Accordingly, in consequence of their

exalted conduct, they not only immediately recovered their own city

and territory, but soon afterwards disputed the supremacy in Greece

with the Lacedaemonians. Subsequently, indeed, they were beaten by the

Spartans in war, and forced to submit to the destruction of their own

city walls: but even this one might assert to be a reproach to the

Lacedaemonians, for having used the power put into their hands with

excessive severity, rather than to the Athenians. Then the Spartans

once more, being beaten by the Thebans, lost the supremacy in Greece,

and after that defeat were deprived of their outside rule and reduced

to the frontiers of Laconia. But what disgrace was there in having

retired, while disputing for the most honourable objects, to the limits

of their ancestral dominion? Therefore, these events we may speak of

as failures, but not as misfortunes in any sense. The Mantineans again

were forced to leave their city, being divided out and scattered into

separate villages by the Lacedaemonians; but for this all the world

blamed the folly, not of the Mantineans, but of the Lacedaemonians.

The Thebans, indeed, besides the loss of their army, saw their country

depopulated at the time when Alexander, having resolved on the invasion

of Asia, conceived that by making an example of Thebes he should

establish a tenor that would act as a check upon the Greeks, while his

attention was distracted upon other affairs: but at that time all the

world pitied the Thebans as having been treated with injustice and

harshness, and no one was found to justify this proceeding of Alexander.

[Sidenote: The tyranny of the later kings of Macedonia.]

[Sidenote: But the last fall of Greece was embittered by the fact that

it came from the folly of the Greeks themselves]

[Sidenote: rather than of their leaders.]

+5.+ Accordingly after a short time they obtained assistance, and

once more inhabited their country in security. For the compassion of

foreigners is no small benefit to those who are unjustly dispossessed;

since we often see that, with the change of feeling among the many,

Fortune also changes; and even the conquerors themselves repent, and

make good the disasters of those who have fallen under undeserved

misfortunes. Once more, at certain periods the Chalcidians and

Corinthians and some other cities, owing to the advantages of their

situation, were attacked by kings of Macedonia, and had garrisons

imposed on them: but when they were thus enslaved all the world were

eager to do their best to liberate them, and loathed their enslavers

and regarded them continually as their enemies. But above all, up to

this time it was generally single states that were depopulated, and

in single states that reverses were met with, in some cases while

disputing for supremacy and empire, and in others from the treacherous

attacks of despots and kings: so that, so far from their losses

bringing them any reproach, they escaped even the name of misfortune.

For we must look on all those who meet with incalculable disasters

whether private or public as the victims of losses, and those only

to be “unfortunate,” to whom events through their own folly bring

dishonour. Instances of this last are the Peloponnesians, Boeotians,

Phocians, ... and Locrians, some of the dwellers on the Ionian gulf,

and next to these the Macedonians, ... who all as a rule did not

merely suffer loss, but were “unfortunate,” with a misfortune of the

gravest kind and for which they were themselves open to reproach:

for they displayed at once want of good faith and want of courage,

brought upon themselves a series of disgraces, lost all that could

bring them honour, ... and voluntarily admitted into their towns the

Roman fasces and axes. They were in the utmost panic, in fact, owing

to the extravagance of their own wrongful acts, if one ought to call

them their own; for I should rather say that the peoples as such were

entirely ignorant, and were beguiled from the path of right: but that

the men who _acted_ wrongly were the authors of this delusion.

+6.+ In regard to these men, it should not be a matter of surprise if

we leave for a while the ordinary method and spirit of our narrative

to give a clearer and more elaborate exposition of their character.

I am aware that some may be found, regarding it as their first duty

to cast a veil over the errors of the Greeks, to accuse us of writing

in a spirit of malevolence. But for myself, I conceive that with

right-minded persons a man will never be regarded as a true friend

who shrinks from and is afraid of plain speech, nor indeed as a good

citizen who abandons the truth because of the offence he will give

to certain persons at the time. But a writer of public history above

all deserves no indulgence whatever, who regards anything of superior

importance to truth. For in proportion as written history reaches

larger numbers, and survives for longer time, than words spoken to

suit an occasion, both the writer ought to be still more particular

about truth, and his readers ought to admit his authority only so far

as he adheres to this principle. At the actual hour of danger it is

only right that Greeks should help Greeks in every possible way, by

protecting them, veiling their errors or deprecating the wrath of the

sovereign people,—and this I genuinely did for my part at the actual

time: but it is also right, in regard to the record of events to be

transmitted to posterity, to leave them unmixed with any falsehood:

so that readers should not be merely gratified for the moment by a

pleasant tale, but should receive in their souls a lesson which will

prevent a repetition of similar errors in the future. Enough, however,

on this subject....

_In the autumn of_ B.C. _150 the corrupt Menalcidas of Sparta was

succeeded as Achaean Strategus by Diaeus, who, to cover his share

in the corruption of Menalcidas, induced the league to act in the

matter of some disputed claim of Sparta in a manner contrary to the

decisions of the Roman Senate. The Spartans wished to appeal again to

Rome; whereupon the Achaeans passed a law forbidding separate cities

to make such appeals, which were to be only made by the league. The

Lacedaemonians took up arms: and Diaeus professing that the league was

not at war with Sparta, but with certain factious citizens of that

city, named four of its chief men who were to be banished. They fled to

Rome, where the Senate ordered their restoration. Embassies went from

Achaia and from Sparta to Rome to state their respective cases; and on

their return gave false reports,—Diaeus assuring the Achaeans that the

Senate had ordered the Spartans to obey the league; Menalchidas telling

the Spartans that the Romans had released them from all connexion with

the league. War then again broke out (B.C. 148). Metellus, who was in

Macedonia on the business of the Pseudo-Philip, sent legates to the

Achaeans forbidding them to bear arms against Sparta, and announcing

the speedy arrival of commissioners from Rome to settle the dispute.

But the Achaean levies were already mustered under the Strategus

Damocritus, and the Lacedaemonians seem to have almost compelled them

to fight. The Spartans were beaten with considerable loss: and on

Damocritus preventing a pursuit and a capture of Sparta, the Achaeans

regarded him as traitor and fined him fifty talents. He was succeeded

in his office of Strategus by Diaeus (autumn B.C. 148-B.C. 147) who

promised Metellus to await the arrival of the commissioners from

Rome. But the Spartans now assumed their freedom from the league and

elected a Strategus of their own, Menalchidas; who provoked a renewal

of the war by taking the town of Iasos on the Laconian frontier. In

despair of resisting the attack of the Achaeans, and disowned by his

fellow-citizens, he took poison. The Roman commissioners arrived, led

by L. Aurelius Orestes, in B.C. 147, and summoning the magistrates of

the Achaean towns and the Strategus Diaeus before them at Corinth,

announced the decision of the Senate—separating Lacedaemon, Corinth,

Argos, Heraclea near Aete, and Orchomenus in Arcadia from the Achaean

league, as not being united by blood, and only being subsequent

additions. The magistrates, without answering, hastily summoned the

league congress. The people, on hearing the Roman decision, pillaged

the houses of the Lacedaemonian residents in Corinth, and savagely

attacked all who were or who looked like Spartans. The Roman envoys

endeavoured to restrain the popular fury. But they were somewhat

roughly handled themselves; and the people could not be persuaded to

release the Spartans whom they had arrested: though they let all others

go, and sent an embassy to Rome, which, however, meeting the former

embassy on its return, and learning the hopelessness of support in

Rome, returned home. It is this outbreak which is referred to in the

next fragment. See Pausanias, vii. 12-14; Livy_, Ep. 51.

[Sidenote: On the report of L. Aurelius Orestes of the disturbance at

Corinth, B.C. 147,]

[Sidenote: the Senate send a fresh commission to warn the Achaeans.]

+7.+ When the commissioners with L. Aurelius Orestes arrived in Rome

from the Peloponnese, they reported what had taken place, and declared

that they had a narrow escape of actually losing their lives. They made

the most of the occurrence and put the worst interpretation upon it;

for they represented the violence which had been offered them as not

the result of a sudden outbreak, but of a deliberate intention on the

part of the Achaeans to inflict a signal insult upon them. The Senate

was therefore more angry than it had ever been, and at once appointed

Sextus Julius Caesar and other envoys with instructions to rebuke and

upbraid the Achaeans for what had occurred, yet in terms of moderation,

but to exhort them “not to listen to evil councillors, not to allow

themselves to be betrayed into hostility with Rome, but even yet to

make amends for their acts of folly by inflicting punishment on the

authors of the crime.” This was a clear proof that the Senate gave

its instructions to Aurelius and his colleagues, not with the view

of dismembering the league, but with the object of restraining the

obstinacy and hostility of the Achaeans by terrifying and overawing

them. Some people accordingly imagined that the Romans were acting

hypocritically, because the Carthaginian war was still unfinished; but

this was not the case. The fact is, that they had long regarded the

Achaean league with favour, believing it to be the most trustworthy of

all the Greek governments; and though now they were resolved to give it

an alarm, because it had become too lofty in its pretensions, yet they

were by no means minded to go to war or to have a serious quarrel with

the Achaeans....

[Sidenote: Arrival of Sextus Julius and the commissioners in Achaia.]

[Sidenote: Conference at Aegium. The envoys are conciliatory.]

[Sidenote: Action of Diaeus ans Critolaus and their party.]

+8.+ As Sextus Julius Caesar and his colleagues were on their way

from Rome to the Peloponnese, they were met by Thearidas and the

other envoys, sent by the Achaeans to make their excuse and give the

Senate an explanation of the intemperate acts committed in regard to

Aurelius Orestes. But Sextus Julius persuaded them to turn back to

Achaia, on the ground that he and his colleagues were coming with full

instructions to communicate with the Achaeans on all these points.

When Sextus arrived in the Peloponnese, and in a conference with the

Achaeans in Aegium spoke with great kindness, he made no mention of

the injurious treatment of the legates, and scarcely demanded any

defence at all, but took a more lenient view of what had happened than

even the Achaeans themselves; and dwelt chiefly on the subject of

exhorting them not to carry their error any further, in regard either

to the Romans or the Lacedaemonians. Thereupon the more sober-minded

party received the speech with satisfaction, and were strongly moved

to obey the suggestions, because they were conscious of the gravity of

what they had been doing, and had before their eyes what happened to

opponents of Rome; but the majority, though they had not a word to say

against the justice of the injunctions of Sextus Julius, and were quite

silent, yet remained deeply tainted with disaffection. And Diaeus and

Critolaus, and all who shared their sentiments,—and they consisted of

all the greatest rascals in every city, men at war with the gods, and

pests of the community, carefully selected,—took, as the proverb has

it, with the left hand what the Romans gave with the right, and went

utterly and entirely wrong in their calculations. For they supposed

that the Romans, owing to the troubles in Libya and Iberia, feared a

war with the Achaeans and would submit to anything and say anything.

Thinking, therefore, that the hour was their own, they answered the

Roman envoys politely that “They would, nevertheless, send Thearidas

and his colleagues to the Senate; while they would themselves accompany

the legates to Tegea, and there in consultation with the Lacedaemonians

would provide for some settlement of the war that would meet the views

of both parties.” With this answer they subsequently induced the

unhappy nation to follow the senseless course to which they had long

before made up their mind. And this result was only what might have

been expected from the inexperience and corruption of the prevailing

party.

[Sidenote: Conference at Tegea. Critolaus contrives to avoid a

settlement.]

+9.+ But the finishing stroke to this ruinous policy was given in the

following manner. When Sextus and his colleagues arrived at Tegea,

and invited the attendance of the Lacedaemonians, in order to arrange

terms between them and the Achaeans, both as to the satisfaction to be

given for previous complaints and for putting a stop to the war, until

the Romans should send commissioners to review the whole question,

Critolaus and his party, having held a conference, decided that all

the rest should avoid the meeting, and that Critolaus should go alone

to Tegea. When Sextus and his fellow-commissioners therefore had

almost given them up, Critolaus arrived; and when the meeting with the

Lacedaemonians took place, he would settle nothing,—alleging that he

had no authority to make any arrangement without the consent of the

people at large; but that he would bring the matter before the Achaeans

at their next congress, which must be held six months from that time.

Sextus and his fellow-commissioners, therefore, convinced of the ill

disposition of Critolaus, and much annoyed at his conduct, dismissed

the Lacedaemonians to their own country, and themselves returned to

Italy with strong views as to the folly and infatuation of Critolaus.

[Sidenote: Winter of B.C. 147-146. Critolaus propagates his anti-Roman

views;]

[Sidenote: and suspends cash payments.]

After their departure Critolaus spent the winter in visiting the cities

and holding assemblies in them, on the pretext that he wished to inform

them of what he had said to the Lacedaemonians at Tegea, but in reality

to denounce the Romans and to put an evil interpretation on everything

they said; by which means he inspired the common people in the various

cities with feelings of hostility and hatred for them. At the same

time he sent round orders to the magistrates not to exact money from

debtors, nor to receive prisoners arrested for debt, and to cause loans

on pledge to be held over until the war was decided. By this kind of

appeal to the interests of the vulgar everything he said was received

with confidence; and the common people were ready to obey any order he

gave, being incapable of taking thought for the future, but caught by

the bait of immediate indulgence and relief.

[Sidenote: Fresh legates are sent from Macedonia to Achaia in the

winter of B.C. 147-146.]

[Sidenote: Riotous scene at Corinth.]

+10.+ When Quintus Caecilius Metellus heard in Macedonia of the

commotion and disturbance going on in the Peloponnese, he despatched

thither his legates Gnaeus Papirius and the younger Popilius Laenas,

along with Aulus Gabinius and Gaius Fannius; who, happening to arrive

when the congress was assembled at Corinth, were introduced to the

assembly, and delivered a long and conciliatory speech, much in the

spirit of that of Sextus Julius, exerting themselves with great zeal

to prevent the Achaeans from proceeding to an open breach with Rome,

either on the pretext of their grievance against the Lacedaemonians,

or from any feeling of anger against the Romans themselves. But the

assembled people would not hear them; insulting words were loudly

uttered against the envoys, and in the midst of a storm of yells and

tumult they were driven from the assembly. The fact was that such a

crowd of workmen and artisans had been got together as had never been

collected before; for all the cities were in a state of drivelling

folly, and above all the Corinthians _en masse_; and there were only a

very few who heartily approved of the words of the envoys.

[Sidenote: Critolaus makes no secret of his hostility to Rome.]

Critolaus, conceiving that he had attained his purpose, in the midst

of an audience as excited and mad as himself began attacking the

magistrates, abusing all who were opposed to him, and openly defying

the Roman envoys, saying that he was desirous of being a friend of the

Romans, but had no taste for them as his masters. And, finally, he

tried to incite the people by saying that, if they quitted themselves

like men, they would have no lack of allies; but, if they betrayed

womanish fears, they would not want for masters. By many other such

words to the same effect, conceived in the spirit of a charlatan and

huckster, he roused and excited the populace. He attempted also to make

it plain that he was not acting at random in these proceedings, but

that some of the kings and republics were engaged in the same policy as

himself.

[Sidenote: Critolaus carries his point, and induces the Achaeans to

proclaim war against the Lacedaemonians.]

+11.+ And when some of the Gerusia wished to check him, and restrain

him from the use of such expressions, he ordered the soldiers

surrounding him to retire, and stood up fronting his opponents, and

bade any one of them come up to him, come near him, or venture to touch

his chlamys. And, finally, he said that “He had restrained himself now

for a long time; but would endure it no longer, and must speak his

mind. The people to fear were not Lacedaemonians or Romans, but the

traitors among themselves who co-operated with their foes: for there

were some who cared more for Romans and Lacedaemonians than for their

own country.” He added, as a confirmation of his words, that Evagoras

of Aegium and Stratius of Tritaea betrayed to Gnaeus Papirius and

his fellow-commissioners all the secret proceedings in the meetings

of the magistrates. And when Stratius acknowledged that he had had

interviews with those men, and should do so again, as they were friends

and allies, but asserted that he had told them nothing of what was

said in the meetings of the magistrates, some few believed him, but

the majority accepted the accusation as true. And so Critolaus, having

inflamed the people by his accusations against these men, induced

the Achaeans once more to decree a war which was nominally against

the Lacedaemonians, but in effect was against the Romans; and he got

another decree added, which was a violation of the constitution,

namely, that whomsoever they should elect as Strategi should have

absolute power in carrying on the war. He thus got for himself

something like a despotism.

[Sidenote: The Roman envoys retire from Corinth.]

Having carried these measures, he began intriguing to bring on an

outbreak and cause an attack upon the Roman envoys. He had no pretext

for doing this; but adopted a course which, of all possible courses,

offends most flagrantly against the laws of gods and man. The envoys,

however, separated; Gnaeus Papirius went to Athens and thence to Sparta

to watch the turn of events; Aulus Gabinius went to Naupactus; and the

other two remained at Athens, waiting for the arrival of Caecilius

Metellus. This was the state of things in the Peloponnese....

The Histories of Polybius, Vol. 2 (of 2) · 第 28 / 31 章