The Sioux are the largest and strongest tribe within the United States.

In spite of wars, removals, and diminished food supply since the advent

of the white man, they still number nearly 26,000. In addition to

these there are about 600 more residing in Canada. They formerly held

the headwaters of the Mississippi, extending eastward almost to Lake

Superior, but were driven into the prairie about two centuries ago by

their enemies, the Ojibwa, after the latter had obtained firearms from

the French. On coming out on the buffalo plains they became possessed

of the horse, by means of which reinforcement to their own overpowering

numbers the Sioux were soon enabled to assume the offensive, and

in a short time had made themselves the undisputed masters of an

immense territory extending, in a general way, from Minnesota to the

Rocky mountains and from the Yellowstone to the Platte. A few small

tribes were able to maintain their position within these limits, but

only by keeping close to their strongly built permanent villages on

the Missouri. Millions of buffalo to furnish unlimited food supply,

thousands of horses, and hundreds of miles of free range made the

Sioux, up to the year 1868, the richest and most prosperous, the

proudest, and withal, perhaps, the wildest of all the tribes of the

plains.

In that year, in pursuance of a policy inaugurated for bringing all the

plains tribes under the direct control of the government, a treaty was

negotiated with the Sioux living west of the Missouri by which they

renounced their claims to a great part of their territory and had “set

apart for their absolute and undisturbed use and occupation”—so the

treaty states—a reservation which embraced all of the present state

of South Dakota west of Missouri river. At the same time agents were

appointed and agencies established for them; annuities and rations,

cows, physicians, farmers, teachers, and other good things were

promised them, and they agreed to allow railroad routes to be surveyed

and built and military posts to be established in their territory and

neighborhood. At one stroke they were reduced from a free nation to

dependent wards of the government. It was stipulated also that they

should be allowed to hunt within their old range, outside the limits of

the reservation, so long as the buffalo abounded—a proviso which, to

the Indians, must have meant forever.

The reservation thus established was an immense one, and would have

been ample for all the Sioux while being gradually educated toward

civilization, could the buffalo have remained and the white man kept

away. But the times were changing. The building of the railroads

brought into the plains swarms of hunters and emigrants, who began

to exterminate the buffalo at such a rate that in a few years the

Sioux, with all the other hunting tribes of the plains, realized that

their food supply was rapidly going. Then gold was discovered in the

Black hills, within the reservation, and at once thousands of miners

and other thousands of lawless desperadoes rushed into the country

in defiance of the protests of the Indians and the pledges of the

government, and the Sioux saw their last remaining hunting ground

taken from them. The result was the Custer war and massacre, and a new

agreement in 1876 by which the Sioux were shorn of one-third of their

guaranteed reservation, including the Black hills, and this led to deep

and widespread dissatisfaction throughout the tribe. The conservatives

brooded over the past and planned opposition to further changes which

they felt themselves unable to meet. The progressives felt that the

white man’s promises meant nothing.

On this point Commissioner Morgan says, in his statement of the causes

of the outbreak:

Prior to the agreement of 1876 buffalo and deer were the main

support of the Sioux. Food, tents, bedding were the direct outcome

of hunting, and with furs and pelts as articles of barter or

exchange it was easy for the Sioux to procure whatever constituted

for them the necessaries, the comforts, or even the luxuries

of life. Within eight years from the agreement of 1876 the

buffalo had gone and the Sioux had left to them alkali land and

government rations. It is hard to overestimate the magnitude of

the calamity, as they viewed it, which happened to these people by

the sudden disappearance of the buffalo and the large diminution

in the numbers of deer and other wild animals. Suddenly, almost

without warning, they were expected at once and without previous

training to settle down to the pursuits of agriculture in a land

largely unfitted for such use. The freedom of the chase was to be

exchanged for the idleness of the camp. The boundless range was

to be abandoned for the circumscribed reservation, and abundance

of plenty to be supplanted by limited and decreasing government

subsistence and supplies. Under these circumstances it is not in

human nature not to be discontented and restless, even turbulent

and violent. (_Comr., 28._)

It took our own Aryan ancestors untold centuries to develop from

savagery into civilization. Was it reasonable to expect that the Sioux

could do the same in fourteen years?

The white population in the Black hills had rapidly increased, and it

had become desirable to open communication between eastern and western

Dakota. To accomplish this, it was proposed to cut out the heart of

the Sioux reservation, and in 1882, only six years after the Black

hills had been seized, the Sioux were called on to surrender more

territory. A commission was sent out to treat with them, but the price

offered—only about 8 cents per acre—was so absurdly small, and the

methods used so palpably unjust, that friends of the Indians interposed

and succeeded in defeating the measure in Congress. Another agreement

was prepared, but experience had made the Indians suspicious, and it

was not until a third commission went out, under the chairmanship of

General Crook, known to the Indians as a brave soldier and an honorable

man, that the Sioux consented to treat. (_Welsh, 1._) The result, after

much effort on the part of the commission and determined opposition

by the conservatives, was another agreement, in 1889, by which the

Sioux surrendered one-half (about 11,000,000 acres) of their remaining

territory, and the great reservation was cut up into five smaller ones,

the northern and southern reservations being separated by a strip 60

miles wide.

Then came a swift accumulation of miseries. Dakota is an arid country

with thin soil and short seasons. Although well adapted to grazing it

is not suited to agriculture, as is sufficiently proven by the fact

that the white settlers in that and the adjoining state of Nebraska

have several times been obliged to call for state or federal assistance

on account of failure of crops. To wild Indians hardly in from the

warpath the problem was much more serious. As General Miles points out

in his official report, thousands of white settlers after years of

successive failures had given up the struggle and left the country, but

the Indians, confined to reservations, were unable to emigrate, and

were also as a rule unable to find employment, as the whites might, by

which they could earn a subsistence. The buffalo was gone. They must

depend on their cattle, their crops, and the government rations issued

in return for the lands they had surrendered. If these failed, they

must starve. The highest official authorities concur in the statement

that all of these did fail, and that the Indians were driven to

outbreak by starvation. (See appendix to this chapter.)

In 1888 their cattle had been diminished by disease. In 1889 their

crops were a failure, owing largely to the fact that the Indians had

been called into the agency in the middle of the farming season and

kept there to treat with the commission, going back afterward to find

their fields trampled and torn up by stock during their absence. Then

followed epidemics of measles, grippe, and whooping cough, in rapid

succession and with terribly fatal results. Anyone who understands

the Indian character needs not the testimony of witnesses to know the

mental effect thus produced. Sullenness and gloom, amounting almost

to despair, settled down on the Sioux, especially among the wilder

portion. “The people said their children were all dying from the face

of the earth, and they might as well be killed at once.” Then came

another entire failure of crops in 1890, and an unexpected reduction

of rations, and the Indians were brought face to face with starvation.

They had been expressly and repeatedly told by the commission that

their rations would not be affected by their signing the treaty, but

immediately on the consummation of the agreement Congress cut down

their beef rations by 2,000,000 pounds at Rosebud, 1,000,000 at Pine

Ridge, and in less proportion at other agencies. Earnest protest

against this reduction was made by the commission which had negotiated

the treaty, by Commissioner Morgan, and by General Miles, but still

Congress failed to remedy the matter until the Sioux had actually

been driven to rebellion. As Commissioner Morgan states, “It was not

until January, 1891, _after the troubles_, that an appropriation of

$100,000 was made by Congress for additional beef for the Sioux.” The

protest of the commission, a full year before the outbreak, as quoted

by Commissioner Morgan (see page 829), is strong and positive on this

point.

Commissioner Morgan, while claiming that the Sioux had before been

receiving more rations than they were justly entitled to according

to their census number, and denying that the reduction was such as

to cause even extreme suffering, yet states that the reduction was

especially unwise at this juncture, as it was in direct violation of

the promises made to the Indians, and would be used as an argument

by those opposed to the treaty to show that the government cared

nothing for the Indians after it had obtained their lands. It is

quite possible that the former number of rations was greater than the

actual number of persons, as it is always a difficult matter to count

roving Indians, and the difficulties were greater when the old census

was made. The census is taken at long intervals and the tendency is

nearly always toward a decrease. Furthermore, it has usually been the

policy with agents to hold their Indians quiet by keeping them as

well fed as possible. On the other hand, it must be remembered that

the issue is based on the weight of the cattle as delivered at the

agency in the fall, and that months of exposure to a Dakota winter

will reduce this weight by several hundred pounds to the animal. The

official investigation by Captain Hurst at Cheyenne River agency shows

conclusively that the essential food items of meat, flour, and coffee

were far below the amount stipulated by the treaty. (See page 837.)

In regard to the effect of this food deficiency Bishop Hare says: “The

people were often hungry and, the physicians in many cases said, died,

when taken sick, not so much from disease as for want of food.” General

Miles says: “The fact that they had not received sufficient food is

admitted by the agents and the officers of the government who have

had opportunities of knowing,” and in another place he states that in

spite of crop failures and other difficulties, after the sale of the

reservation “instead of an increase, or even a reasonable supply for

their support, they have been compelled to live on half and two-thirds

rations and received nothing for the surrender of their lands.” The

testimony from every agency is all to the same effect.

There were other causes of dissatisfaction, some local and others

general and chronic, which need not be detailed here. Some of these

are treated in the documents appended to this chapter. Prominent among

them were the failure of Congress to make payment of the money due the

Sioux for the lands recently ceded, or to have the new lines surveyed

promptly so that the Indians might know what was still theirs and

select their allotments accordingly; failure to reimburse the friendly

Indians for horses confiscated fourteen years before; the tardy arrival

of annuities, consisting largely of winter clothing, which according

to the treaty were due by the 1st of August, but which seldom arrived

until the middle of winter; the sweeping and frequent changes of agency

employees from the agent down, preventing anything like a systematic

working out of any consistent policy, and almost always operating

against the good of the service, especially at Pine Ridge, where so

brave and efficient a man as McGillycuddy was followed by such a one as

Royer—and, finally, the Ghost dance.

The Ghost dance itself, in the form which it assumed among the

Sioux, was only a symptom and expression of the real causes of

dissatisfaction, and with such a man as McGillycuddy or McLaughlin

in charge at Pine Ridge there would have been no outbreak, in spite

of broken promises and starvation, and the Indians could have been

controlled until Congress had afforded relief. That it was not the

cause of the outbreak is sufficiently proved by the fact that there

was no serious trouble, excepting on the occasion of the attempt to

arrest Sitting Bull, on any other of the Sioux reservations, and none

at all among any of the other Ghost-dancing tribes from the Missouri to

the Sierras, although the doctrine and the dance were held by nearly

every tribe within that area and are still held by the more important.

Among the Paiute, where the doctrine originated and the messiah has his

home, there was never the slightest trouble. It is significant that

Commissioner Morgan in his official statement of the causes of the

outbreak places the “messiah craze” eleventh in a list of twelve, the

twelfth being the alarm created by the appearance of troops. The Sioux

outbreak of 1890 was due entirely to local grievances, recent or long

standing. The remedy and preventive for similar trouble in the future

is sufficiently indicated in the appended statements of competent

authorities.

APPENDIX—CAUSES OF THE OUTBREAK

COMMISSIONER MORGAN’S STATEMENT

[_From the Report of the Commissioner of Indian Affairs

for 1891, Vol. I, 132–135._]

In stating the events which led to this outbreak among the Sioux,

the endeavor too often has been merely to find some opportunity for

locating blame. The causes are complex, and many are obscure and

remote. Among them may be named the following:

First. A feeling of unrest and apprehension in the mind of the Indians

has naturally grown out of the rapid advance in civilization and the

great changes which this advance has necessitated in their habits and

mode of life.

Second. Prior to the agreement of 1876 buffalo and deer were the main

support of the Sioux. Food, tents, bedding were the direct outcome of

hunting, and, with furs and pelts as articles of barter or exchange,

it was easy for the Sioux to procure whatever constituted for them the

necessaries, the comforts, or even the luxuries of life. Within eight

years from the agreement of 1876 the buffalo had gone, and the Sioux

had left to them alkali land and government rations. It is hard to

overestimate the magnitude of the calamity, as they viewed it, which

happened to these people by the sudden disappearance of the buffalo and

the large diminution in the numbers of deer and other wild animals.

Suddenly, almost without warning, they were expected at once and

without previous training to settle down to the pursuits of agriculture

in a land largely unfitted for such use. The freedom of the chase was

to be exchanged for the idleness of the camp. The boundless range

was to be abandoned for the circumscribed reservation, and abundance

of plenty to be supplanted by limited and decreasing government

subsistence and supplies. Under these circumstances it is not in human

nature not to be discontented and restless, even turbulent and violent.

Third. During a long series of years, treaties, agreements, cessions

of land and privileges, and removals of bands and agencies have kept

many of the Sioux, particularly those at Pine Ridge and Rosebud, in

an unsettled condition, especially as some of the promises made them

were fulfilled tardily or not at all. (A brief history of negotiations

with the Sioux was given in my letter of December 24, 1890, to the

Department, which will be found in the appendix, page 182.)

Fourth. The very large reduction of the great Sioux reservation,

brought about by the Sioux commission through the consent of the

large majority of the adult males, was bitterly opposed by a large,

influential minority. For various reasons, they regarded the cession

as unwise, and did all in their power to prevent its consummation, and

afterwards were constant in their expressions of dissatisfaction and

in their endeavors to awaken a like feeling in the minds of those who

signed the agreement.

Fifth. There was diminution and partial failure of the crops for 1889,

by reason of their neglect by the Indians, who were congregated in

large numbers at the council with the Sioux commission, and a further

diminution of ordinary crops by the drought of 1890. Also, in 1888, the

disease of black leg appeared among the cattle of the Indians.

Sixth. At this time, by delayed and reduced appropriations, the Sioux

rations were temporarily cut down. Rations were not diminished to

such an extent as to bring the Indians to starvation or even extreme

suffering, as has been often reported; but short rations came just

after the Sioux commission had negotiated the agreement for the cession

of lands, and, as a condition of securing the signatures of the

majority, had assured the Indians that their rations would be continued

unchanged. To this matter the Sioux commission called special attention

in their report dated December 24, 1889, as follows:

“During our conference at the different agencies we were repeatedly

asked whether the acceptance or rejection of the act of Congress

would influence the action of the government with reference to

their rations, and in every instance the Indians were assured that

subsistence was furnished in accordance with former treaties, and that

signing would not affect their rations, and that they would continue

to receive them as provided in former treaties. Without our assurances

to this effect it would have been impossible to have secured their

consent to the cession of their lands. Since our visit to the agencies

it appears that large reductions have been made in the amounts of

beef furnished for issues, amounting at Rosebud to 2,000,000 pounds

and at Pine Ridge to 1,000,000 pounds, and lesser amounts at the

other agencies. This action of the Department, following immediately

after the successful issue of our negotiations, can not fail to have

an injurious effect. It will be impossible to convince the Indians

that the reduction is not due to the fact that the government,

having obtained their land, has less concern in looking after their

material interests than before. It will be looked upon as a breach of

faith and especially as a violation of the express statements of the

commissioners. Already this action is being used by the Indians opposed

to the bill, notably at Pine Ridge, as an argument in support of the

wisdom of their opposition.”

In forwarding this report to Congress the Department called special

attention to the above-quoted statements of the commission and said:

“The commission further remarks that as to the quality of the rations

furnished there seems to be no just cause for complaint, but that it

was particularly to be avoided that there should be any diminution of

the rations promised under the former treaties at this time, as the

Indians would attribute it to their assent to the bill. Such diminution

certainly should not be allowed, as the government is bound in good

faith to carry into effect the former treaties where not directly and

positively affected by the act, and if under the provisions of the

treaty itself the ration is at any time reduced, the commissioners

recommend that the Indians should be notified before spring opens, so

that crops may be cultivated. It is desirable that the recent reduction

made should be restored, as it is now impossible to convince the

Indians that it was not due to the fact that the government, having

obtained their lands, had less concern in looking after their material

interests.”

Notwithstanding this plea of the commission and of the Department, the

appropriation made for the subsistence and civilization of the Sioux

for 1890 was only $950,000, or $50,000 less than the amount estimated

and appropriated for 1888 and 1889, and the appropriation not having

been made until August 19, rations had to be temporarily purchased and

issued in limited quantities pending arrival of new supplies to be

secured from that appropriation. It was not until January, 1891, after

the troubles, that an appropriation of $100,000 was made by Congress

for additional beef for the Sioux.

Seventh. Other promises made by the Sioux commission and the agreement

were not promptly fulfilled; among them were increase of appropriations

for education, for which this office had asked an appropriation of

$150,000; the payment of $200,000 in compensation for ponies taken from

the Sioux in 1876 and 1877; and the reimbursement of the Crow Creek

Indians for a reduction made in their per capita allowance of land,

as compared with the amount allowed other Sioux, which called for an

appropriation of $187,039. The fulfillment of all these promises except

the last named was contained in the act of January 19, 1891.

Eighth. In 1889 and 1890 epidemics of la grippe, measles, and whooping

cough, followed by many deaths, added to the gloom and misfortune which

seemed to surround the Indians.

Ninth. The wording of the agreement changed the boundary line between

the Rosebud and Pine Ridge diminished reservations and necessitated a

removal of a portion of the Rosebud Indians from the lands which, by

the agreement, were included in the Pine Ridge reservation to lands

offered them in lieu thereof upon the diminished Rosebud reserve. This,

although involving no great hardship to any considerable number, added

to the discontent.

Tenth. Some of the Indians were greatly opposed to the census which

Congress ordered should be taken. The census at Rosebud, as reported

by Special Agent Lea and confirmed by a special census taken by

Agent Wright, revealed the somewhat startling fact that rations had

been issued to Indians very largely in excess of the number actually

present, and this diminution of numbers as shown by the census

necessitated a diminution of the rations, which was based, of course,

upon the census.

Eleventh. The Messiah craze, which fostered the belief that “ghost

shirts” would be invulnerable to bullets, and that the supremacy of the

Indian race was assured, added to discontent the fervor of fanaticism

and brought those who accepted the new faith into the attitude of

sullen defiance, but defensive rather than aggressive.

Twelfth. The sudden appearance of military upon their reservation

gave rise to the wildest rumors among the Indians of danger and

disaster, which were eagerly circulated by disaffected Indians and

corroborated by exaggerated accounts in the newspapers, and these and

other influences connected with and inseparable from military movements

frightened many Indians away from their agencies into the bad lands and

largely intensified whatever spirit of opposition to the government

existed.

EX-AGENT McGILLYCUDDY’S STATEMENT

[_Letter of Dr V. T. McGillycuddy, formerly agent at Pine Ridge,

written in reply to inquiry from General L. W. Colby, commanding

Nebraska state troops during the outbreak, and dated January

15, 1891. From article on “The Sioux Indian War of 1890–91,” by

General L. W. Colby, in Transactions and Reports of the Nebraska

State Historical Society, III, 1892, pages 176–180._]

The Ghost-dance religion and the Sioux outbreak of 1890 · 第 22 / 58 段