PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS
_Heaven doth with us as we with torches do,
Not light them for themselves._
SHAKESPEARE: "MEASURE FOR MEASURE."
_Man he loved
As man; and, to the mean and the obscure
And all the homely in their homely works,
Transferred a courtesy which had no air
Of condescension....
A kind of radiant joy
Diffused around him._
WORDSWORTH: "THE PRELUDE."
Paul Jones was a prodigious worker. What he accomplished in his brief
life is proof that he did not waste his time. He had an abnormal
capacity for prolonged exertion, whether at work or at play. Such was
the vigour of his physical frame that he was usually fresh even at the
end of a hard-fought game of football. In fact, he hardly knew what
physical fatigue was; and only once, when he was suffering from a
chill, and had to sit for his senior scholarship examination, do I
recollect his exhibiting any sign of mental fag. He found rest in
change of employment. Athletic exercises were a natural antidote to
his strenuous intellectual work; and music lifted him into the region
of pure emotion and soothed his soul with the concord of sweet sounds.
[Illustration: Paul Jones in his 19th Year.]
Though he had read widely and reflected much on human life and
destiny, he wore his culture as lightly as a flower. Even after he had
left college, he retained the sunny outlook, the gladsomeness and the
bloom of boyhood. Wherever he went he carried with him an
atmosphere of joy. Fresh ingenuousness and glowing enthusiasm were
part of his charm. There was a rich vein of the romantic in his
character, but the cast of his mind was philosophical. He had no
patience with superficiality masquerading as wisdom, and was quick to
detect a fallacy in reasoning. A shining trait in him was
truthfulness. He would never compromise or palter with the truth,
either by way of suppression, or exaggeration, or casuistical
refinement. What Carlyle said of John Sterling applied with remarkable
exactitude to Paul Jones: "True above all one may call him; a man of
perfect veracity in thought, word and deed; there was no guile or
baseness anywhere found in him. Transparent as crystal, he could not
hide anything sinister if such there had been to hide."
Affectations in speech or manner, and what schoolboys call "side" or
"swank," he abhorred. His free-ranging mind loved to explore and
inquire, and he would not be hindered from questionings by the weight of
any convention, or the force of any authority. He obeyed Emerson's
maxim: "Speak as you think; be what you are." From the vice of envy he
was entirely free. His generous spirit loved to praise others, and he
was rather prone to self-depreciation. A lenient judge of the actions of
other individuals, he was a stern and exacting critic of his own. He had
a lofty sense of his personal duty and responsibility; and if ever, or
in anything, he fell short of his self-prescribed standard he would, so
to say, whip himself with cords. From his boyhood he was distinguished
by an extreme conscientiousness. "His chastity of honour felt a stain
like a wound." To him conscience was to be reverenced and obeyed as
"God's most intimate presence in the soul, and His most perfect image in
the world." He had a passionate hatred of injustice, and the very
thought of cruelty to human beings or to dumb animals made him aflame
with anger. A master or a games captain who allowed himself to be
influenced by favouritism he despised. Naturally quick-tempered and
impatient, he tried hard to curb these propensities, not always with
success; but if he had wounded or wronged anybody, he was eager to
atone. Quiet and self-contained in strange company, he was joyous and
witty among kindred souls. His manners were cordial and considerate.
Servants--how he hated the name!--adored him, and he was always at ease
among the working-classes. He was essentially a man's man. To women his
attitude was reverential, but he was shy and embarrassed in young
feminine society. He used to say apologetically, "I have no small talk,"
and from the vacuity of the average drawing-room chatter he would
silently steal away.
For religious dogmas he cared nothing, but he bowed in reverent homage
before the Christ. From some marginal notes he has made on Froude's
essay on Newman's "Grammar of Assent," I take these quotations: "After
all, what matter what our dogmas if we really follow the example of
great teachers like Christ, who had nothing to do with creeds or
ritual?" "Every man should be his own priest." The Sermon on the Mount
was his religion. One of his favourite Scriptural texts was the
familiar one from the Epistle of St. James (i, 27): "Pure religion and
undefiled before God and the Father is this, to visit the fatherless
and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the
world."
Froude in one of his essays writes of the necessity for a campaign
against administrative incapacity, against swindling and cheating,
against drunkenness and uncleanliness, against hunger, squalor and
misery. "Hear, hear," is Paul's comment; "this should be England's
war." His tastes were extremely simple. He disliked luxurious modes
of living, and really enjoyed roughing it. During his twenty-seven
months in the Army he never uttered a complaint as to the conditions;
discomfort and hardship seemed only to heighten his cheerfulness. He
was a non-smoker, and virtually a teetotaller, but in France, when
pure drinking water was unobtainable, he used to take wine at dinner.
Though he set no store on money, he was so frugal in habit and spent
so little on himself that he always had money at his command. Giving
was a joy to him. Blest with perfect health, he was not absent from
duty through indisposition for a single day in his two years'
campaigning.
Paul had in eminent degree the gift of personality. There was
something magnetic about him, and in any company he compelled
attention. His whole being conveyed an impression of exuberant energy.
Strength of will, serenity and good temper were expressed in his
countenance. Wherever he went he attracted responsibility to himself.
Sometimes the burden assigned to him was uncongenial; none the less,
he would shoulder it manfully.
Except for the defect of short sight he was a splendid example of the
_mens sana in corpore sano_. On one occasion, in 1911, returning from
a visit to Canterbury Cathedral, we had as fellow-passenger in the
train a medical practitioner of the old school with whom my wife and I
had an agreeable conversation. I noted that from time to time he was
closely observing Paul, then a boy of fifteen. Presently he asked him
to stand up, passed his hands over his back and shoulders, tapped his
chest, and noted his big bare knees. "Heavens!" exclaimed the old
doctor, "what a magnificent boy! He will grow to be a glorious man. I
have never seen such physique or such vitality." This expert opinion
was borne out by our son's physical growth in the next three years.
Athletic exercises assisted in the development of a physique that was
naturally strong. In his nineteenth year he was six feet in height,
and measured thirty-nine inches round the chest. He had exceptionally
broad shoulders. Not an ounce of superfluous flesh weighed on the
sinewy, supple frame. There was about him the fragrance, radiant
vitality and ease of poise that are characteristic of the athlete in
the pink of condition.
Though moulded on a big scale, he was very alert in movement, and had
an easy swinging carriage. The head was large, hair rich and abundant,
complexion fair, the face round and full, forehead high and spacious,
cheeks ruddy with the glow of health, the mouth firm and kind,
revealing when he smiled a perfect set of teeth; the aspect bold and
noble; grey eyes shone like stars behind his gold-rimmed glasses. A
smile of enchanting sweetness often played about the strong, handsome
face. His voice had a caressing note; his laugh was loud, hearty and
musical. Thanks to his abounding health, neither appetite nor sleep
ever failed him. He had only to place his head on the pillow and sleep
came to him on the instant, and he would not stir for eight or nine
hours. As an infant he often slept twenty hours a day. This precious
gift of sleep remained with him to the end; and in a letter to me in
June, 1917, he humorously remarked that though not far away at the
time, he slept undisturbed by the earth-rending explosion that
preceded our capture of the Messines Ridge. His outstanding
characteristic was massiveness--he was massive in physique, in
intellect, in character. He had the ingenuous simplicity that is often
associated with a big physical frame. In him a modest, unpretending
nature was linked to a great soul. In judgment he was very sagacious,
and for all his idealism there was a shrewd practical side to him. A
boyish zest remained to the last one of his principal characteristics.
In the winter of 1916 we moved into a new house which my wife planned
with special regard to the tastes of our two boys. Alas for these fond
plannings! Paul never saw our new home, never worked in the pleasant
library arranged specially for him, never entered the cosy little room
garnished with his athletic trophies and adorned with those engravings
of Beethoven and Wagner which he so much loved. His last visit home
was in May, 1916. He declined leave at the end of 1916 from a fear
that if he took it he might lose the opportunity of transferring from
the A.S.C. The same spirit of devotion made him, when he was appointed
to the Tank Corps, elect to be trained in France, instead of coming to
England. I think that at last he almost dreaded taking leave lest a
visit home might weaken his resolve to walk the sacrificial road. It
was only after his death that we learnt from his brother officers in
the 2nd Cavalry Brigade that he had often told them he was convinced
he would not survive the War. That conviction seemed only to
strengthen his determination to get into the fighting-line. A voice
within told him his place was in the heart of the combat and he obeyed
its monition with joyful alacrity. From the time he joined the Tank
Corps a sort of divine content filled his soul.
Paul found and gave great happiness in his own home. Never moody or
despondent, his sunny disposition made him like a glory in the house.
He enjoyed nothing better than a frolic with his younger brother, of
whom he was devotedly fond. A racy and witty talker, he loved an
argument. Many a verbal joust he and I had together. Our views did not
always concur. We differed in opinion on many matters, including our
estimates of eminent men, alive and dead. For example, my son did not
share my contempt for Rousseau; nor could I share his admiration for
Frederick the Great and Napoleon, those ruffians of genius who wrought
so much evil in the world. Paul, however, adored men of action, and he
forgot the crimes and moral defects of Napoleon and Frederick in
contemplating the splendour of their achievements. Austere though his
own morals were, he nevertheless held that a man capable of great
service to the State ought not to be debarred from performing it by
his religious opinions or the lack of them, or by the nature of his
private life. He felt that you must take genius on its own terms.
What Paul was to his mother and to me I dare not write. Let it suffice
to say that no parents were ever blessed with a richer treasure. His
love for us flowed through the channel of his being like a river
singing on its way. How proud we were of his nobility of soul, his
heroic temper, his many triumphs! Young as he was we found in him a
firm stay and a sure support, and we felt ourselves more secure in
life under the shelter of his strong and radiant personality. We had
cherished high, and I hope not unworthy, hopes of his future--hopes
which, but for the War, would assuredly have been fulfilled. He had
not settled in his mind what profession he would adopt. Law attracted
him once, then repelled him; and I strongly dissuaded him from
Journalism. Politics had a fascination for him, but in no
circumstances would he have become a professional politician, and he
had resolved to earn an income independently. I am inclined to think
that eventually he would have become a professor and a writer of
history. Though it was a quality of his nature to do thoroughly
whatever he put his hand to, he was not ambitious in the ordinary
sense. He had no lust either for riches or fame. Duty, Honour,
Service--these were his watchwords. His desire was to make his life
worthy and gracious, and to use it in the service of humanity. That
ideal he realised. If he had lived to old age he could not have made a
greater thing of his life. Out of the warp and woof given to him by
the Creator he has woven a noble and beautiful pattern. Words cannot
express what his loss means to us. God alone knows the desolation of
our hearts. But Paul has left us glorious and inspiring memories and
we know he has gone to his reward. We feel, too, that though absent
from us in the body, he is with us in the spirit. His mother and I,
after the first stunning effect of our grief was passing, compared
notes about our inner experiences, and we found that the image of our
beloved son in our eyes was the same: Paul looking divinely happy,
standing before us with that enchanting smile we knew so well, and
cheerily enjoining us to "Carry on; carry on!"
Our love involves the love before;
Our love is vaster passion now;
Tho' mix'd with God and Nature thou,
We seem to love thee more and more.
Far off thou art, but ever nigh;
We have thee still and we rejoice;
We prosper, circled with thy voice;
We shall not lose thee tho' we die.
A few weeks after Paul was killed I opened a volume of Froude's "Short
Studies." Our son's early death lends significance and pathos to
passages he has marked in this book. Froude, in the essay on
"England's Forgotten Worthies," speaking of honoured old
age--"beautiful as the slow-dropping mellow autumn of a rich glorious
summer"--says: "It is beautiful, but not the most beautiful." Then
comes the following sentence which Paul has heavily underscored:
There is another life, hard, rough, and thorny, trodden with
bleeding feet and aching brow; the life of which the Cross is the
symbol; a battle which no peace follows this side of the grave;
which the grave gapes to finish before the victory is won;
and--strange that it should be so--this is the highest life of
man.
Our son has written on the margin, "The best kind of life that of
constant struggle." Froude goes on to refer to the work in the
sixteenth century of the servants of England, whose life was a long
battle, either with the elements or with men, and who passed away
content when God had nothing more to bid them do. The following
passages are again underlined:
They did not complain, and why should we complain for them?... An
honourable death had no terrors for them.
"Seeing," in Humphrey Gilbert's own brave words, "that death is
inevitable and the fame of virtue is immortal, wherefore in this
behalf _mutare vel timere sperno_."
Paul's marginal note to this is, "Compare Browning's 'Prospice.'" I
turn to "Prospice" and I read:
For the journey is done and the summit attained,
And the barriers fall,
Though a battle's to fight ere the guerdon be gained,
The reward of it all.
I was ever a fighter, so--one fight more,
The best and the last!
I would hate that death bandaged my eyes, and forbore,
And bade me creep past.
No! let me taste the whole of it, fare like my peers
The heroes of old,
Bear the brunt, in a minute pay glad life's arrears
Of pain, darkness and cold.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
And with God be the rest!
PART II
WAR LETTERS
[Illustration: Paul as a Subaltern in the A.S.C.
(From a Photograph by his Brother)]
AT A HOME PORT
From April 15, 1915, to July 26 in the same year Second Lieutenant H.
P. M. Jones was employed at a home port which was, and is, one of the
principal centres of supply for the British Expeditionary Force. He
was glad of the opportunity of obtaining an insight into the methods
of supplying the British Army in the field, and was impressed with the
thoroughness, efficiency, and businesslike promptitude of the Army
Service Corps. He took the earliest chance of quitting this routine
work and applying for service abroad.
_May 15th_, 1915.
You London folk seem to have been having high times with the
enemy aliens. It is quite startling and quite pleasant to see
English people roused to do things at last. I see from the photos
in the papers that the rioting was done for a great part by men
of fighting age who ought to be in the Army. It stands to reason
that it is always the dregs of the population who show their
patriotism by this sort of behaviour. Still, it is refreshing to
see someone taking some sort of action. Everybody here is cursing
the Government for its remissness with regard to Germans and
Austrians resident in this country. There are exceptions, such as
Germans who have absorbed the British spirit, but, generally
speaking, Germans, even if naturalised, must retain their
patriotic feelings towards their Fatherland, and the patriotic
German is, of course, England's enemy. Therefore he will try his
best to do us all the harm he can.
Personally I think we ought to take stern action in regard to the
internment of all Germans in this country. My argument is not
based on trivial ideas of retaliation or punishment, but it is
based on facts such as the following: (_a_) I am a Britisher,
Britain is fighting; so I fight for Britain and wish to see her
everywhere victorious: (_b_) In Nature the strongest survive and
the weaker go to the wall, and in this war Britain must prove
herself either the stronger or the weaker: (_c_) Our policy must
be guided by the idea of proving ourselves the stronger in deeds,
not words--not by talk of justice or right, because invariable
universal abstract standards of justice and right never existed,
and never will exist, in this world. The ideal never was anything
but a dream--that is why the poet can never be a politician, and
vice versa. We must not let sentimental considerations stand
between us and victory. Sounds just like a German talking,
doesn't it? Yes, I do agree with the German point of view--except
as regards frightfulness, which is really folly and does not
achieve its end--but I transfer the point of view to England. Why
should England allow any rival to stand in her way? In any case,
are we not the world's greatest political people and the best
colonisers? Leave the realms of Art to the other nations if you
like--England never will be artistic, I fear--but Art is not
politics. Politics--I mean primarily foreign policy--signifies
the adaptation of a nation to environment of time, place and
circumstance, and it is that which is the ruling fact of life.
I am now quite converted to the doctrine of facts. Though
passionately idealistic in many respects, I realise that the
_Facts_ of life are in cruel but deadly opposition to the
_Ideals_ of life, and that while the Ideal remains a dream the
cruel Fact remains the reality.
This pseudo-philosophy arises from my having read Arnold
Bennett's article in to-day's _Daily News_, and also from a
perusal of Hudson's "Herbert Spencer." Bennett is just an
idealist, but in dealing with those cruel realities of which I
have spoken, he seems to me a child. Any attempt to dissociate
the acts of the German Government from the views of the German
people--in other words to assume that a great part of the latter
want peace--is absurd. Look at France in 1870. When the Second
Empire was overthrown and the Third Republic set up in its place,
did the Republicans seek peace? No, they proceeded to prosecute
the war to the utmost and tried to drive the invader off the soil
of France. And even if in this war a succession of defeats should
overthrow the German Kaiser and his Government, do you think the
Germans would submit forthwith, and throw themselves on the mercy
of the Allies? No, they will fight to the last man, woman and
child to prevent the Rhine being crossed. So we should realise
that, for our own safety's sake, we must reduce the German
military forces to a position of helplessness--in fact, utterly
destroy them, if we are to have any settlement. It is Germany or
ourselves; and till one or the other is up or down, the war will
go on.
To crush the Germans we must put every ounce into the struggle.
Are we doing so? I cannot think it when I see Parliament taking
such a disgraceful line on the question of drink. Small wonder
that Lloyd George exclaims, "What an ignoble spectacle the House
of Commons presents now!" I had thought the British Parliament to
be a great and potent institution. Now I think it is a
convocation of old apple women. What we want is a Cromwell or a
Napoleon to knock together the heads of political parties and
declare, "No more drink." What will history say when it is
recorded that in the midst of this great struggle the British
people refused to give up the drink that was poisoning their
lives and hindering the work of the nation, and that the
influence of a few brewers and capitalists was sufficient to
prevent any serious reform being passed in that House which is
supposed to be the people's representative?
As for the recent anti-German riots, they seem to me to have been
organised by those slack loafing elements of the population who
lounge about refusing to enlist. Still, I suppose this is a
necessary product of our type of national civilisation. Yet that
system--the English or insular, I call it--has done, as it will
do, marvels. So perhaps all is for the best, but I am grieved
beyond measure at the collapse of L. G.'s scheme for drastic
treatment of the drink evil. He at least is a man.
Do you realise what a fine part amateur sportsmen are playing in
this war? I really doubt if there will be many great athletes
left if things go on as they are doing. On the same day I read
that Poulton-Palmer and R. A. Lloyd are gone. Only last year, I
remember seeing those two as Captains of England and Ireland
respectively, shaking hands with each other and with the King at
the great Rugby Football match at Twickenham. I see news is to
hand also of the death in action of A. F. Wilding, a great
athlete who neither drank nor smoked. So in three days we have
lost the most brilliant and versatile centre three-quarter in
Poulton, the cleverest drop-kick in the world in Lloyd, and the
world's champion tennis-player in Wilding!
_June 6th, 1915._
Lloyd George in his two last speeches has said more than anyone
else during the war. He is an extraordinary man, and at his
greatest when rallying the workers. I see that the Tory Press is
enthusiastic about him, and also about Winston Churchill's speech
of yesterday. L. G.'s remark that "conscription is not
undemocratic" has set a new train of thought stirring in this
country. Up to now, in the view of the average Englishman,
democracy and conscription had been set at opposite poles.
Personally I am not exactly a democrat, an aristocrat, a
monarchist, a socialist, or a constitutionalist, but a sort of
combination of them all, and a firm believer in the Will to Power
and in the Strong Man. But the point is that England certainly
inclines to democracy--meaning by democracy _laissez-faire_.
Hence what is needed in a crisis like this is to bring into
operation a system which, while partaking of a democratic nature,
and so not being repugnant to the national type (as developed by
geography, circumstance and history) may yet bring into play the
advantages of military training and national organisation. If you
can persuade the stolid Englishman to adopt a sort of
semi-voluntary military system, which is voluntary or appears so
to him, yet puts him under discipline, well then you have an
ideal system for England to win this war by. Of course, there is
an alternative scheme, namely, for some man of outstanding
personality to come along and say, "Look here, I am master, and
by my force of character I will compel you to bow to a system
which I know to be good for you and which will in the end benefit
you." Lloyd George might be even such a man--a Caesar, a
Charlemagne, a Cromwell, or a Napoleon.
But I confess that this amazing English race is hard to bend,
even when a man of outstanding personality arises. Did not Oliver
himself--a superman if ever there was one--fail in his efforts to
make better those whom he ruled? Still, as Goethe says,
"Personality makes the man," and perhaps even in England a great
man might force our stubborn nation to his will. But I confess I
doubt it. Besides, I fear the system would break down as soon as
the immediate need for it had vanished. We must have regard to
the evolution of our type of race-species when trying to frame
measures for its advance to victory over another type of
race-species, for the simple reason that, if we do not, the
system we are trying to set up will remain in the air, and never
come to anything until the people have become sufficiently
educated in our way of thinking to accept such a scheme. It seems
to me that you could never make a British Army on a German model,
or a German Army on a British model, because of the difference
between the types of the two nations--the only exception being
where you have a superman with a wonderful mind and personality
to plan the pattern and enforce its adoption.
Our problem in England is to organise the very individualistic
British race without letting them imagine that they are being
organised. This sounds like the problem about the irresistible
force up against the insurmountable obstacle. But seriously if
you have followed my train of thought you will agree with me that
what is wanted is to frame a system of military service and
national organisation which yet conforms to the national
predilection in favour of _laissez-faire_. This would not be so
difficult if there were two or three centuries to do it in; the
difficulty is that we must do it at once. Perhaps it is
impossible; perhaps the influence of our insular environment will
be too strong ever to allow a general military system to grow up
here--I don't know, but I hope not. Anyway, it is Lloyd George to
whom we look to turn the wheels, because he has personality and
that almost uncanny Celtic gift of seeing into the future.
Is it not clear that the Germans have developed to the full a
system of organisation in harmony with their national character?
Geography has rendered necessary to them a certain type of
national policy, and I consider their methods were the only
possible ones for them, though they badly needed a clever
diplomatist to deceive Europe in these latter years. Now
Bismarck, if he had lived until to-day, would probably have
secured for Germany a leading place, not by directly fighting
England--who is, of course, the natural rival of Germany--the old
story of the first and the second boy in the class--but by
embroiling her at some suitable moment with other Powers. Then,
when all would have been weakened by the war, Germany would step
in and take the spoils. Fortunately for us the Prussian is a
thoroughly bad diplomatist; and he has preferred open force to
policy. Last year the Germans really played their cards
astoundingly badly. Did we? Well, in one sense, yes, in that we
failed to have a force ready to give the Germans a swift blow as
soon as they ventured on an invasion of Belgium. On the other
hand, no, because Edward Grey, acting openly, and in accordance
with British traditions, yet succeeded by some extraordinary
means in duping our enemies and making them rush into a war never
expecting that we would participate in it. By accident Grey
blundered into a marvellous stroke of diplomacy. Of course, we
know that all his actions were governed by an honest desire to
preserve peace, but the facts show that he really deceived the
Germans more than Machiavelli would have done. (The Prussian, in
the average, is very prone to misunderstand his enemy.) The
Germans thought we would not come in; we did come in, just when
they were not expecting it; in effect, that was a master-stroke.
Where we failed was that we were not ourselves ready with an
adequate force. Though we strangled German commerce at sea and
helped to save France, we were deficient in many elements of an
army, and are still woefully so. That is the natural result of
insularity.
Now if through the folly of Ministers we lose this great chance
of settling with our rival, we shall be cutting our own throats.
You see, I have led you, by a devious path, back to the old
problem--the necessity for organising England to win this war and
to establish her national type as supreme. We must take any and
every step necessary to set this great nation of ours even higher
than it stands now. Some nation must be political leader of the
international polity; why not England, whose extraordinary
colonising and governing ability is so well known? I am tired to
death of talk about "crushing militarism" and of wild dreams of
"a union of small States." If you want to see the latter process
in operation, look at the normal state of the Balkans! States may
have all the "rights" in the world, but if they are not strong
enough in a political and military sense, they will never be able
to maintain them. Since England--great and wise nation that she
is!--has the sense to use her power benignantly, what harm would
there be if she were to assert it over weaker national organisms,
as man has done over the beasts? This would certainly not be
possible without repeated wars. Subject nations may be treated as
easily and as freely as you like when under our sway, but they
must be conquered first, and we must keep our power over them
even though it is hidden.
But I am dreaming myself now, for there is nothing eternal in
Nature except conflict and change; and as our Empire grew, so, I
fear, it must some day decay. Evolution is no respecter of
persons. Anyway it is our duty to postpone that day of decline as
long as we can. In my view England's claims are above all others.
Our Allies are just so much use to us as we can make of them.
They, too, have their national ambitions and interests, and, of
course, if these clashed with ours, they would go off on their
own. I blame them not at all. It is as well, however, to be
prepared for contingencies. For example, four or five sparrows
will combine to attack a larger bird which has a piece of bread.
As soon as they get the bread the sparrows themselves begin to
squabble for its possession; and perhaps two or three will set on
the one that has hold of it and force him to give it up. Such is
Nature--a theatre of vast, unceasing conflict. Men and nations
all come under the great immutable law.
_July 19th, 1915._
This coal strike in South Wales is a baffling business. As usual,
English lack of system is to blame. The Government ought to have
taken over all the mines, as they did the railways, right at the
start of the war. But _laissez-faire_ said "No." Now see the
result. Undoubtedly men, employers and Government are all to
blame--the Government for not organising the system and failing
to stop the increased profits of the owners due to the rise in
prices; the owners for taking those profits and making all sorts
of unkept promises during the past year about meeting the men to
discuss what should be done with war profits; and the men because
they are imperilling the whole fate of the Navy for the sake of a
few more pence a day, and for failing to show that generosity of
spirit which they ought to exhibit in a national crisis like
this. What gives the lie to those critics who denounce the
unpatriotic conduct of the miners is the astounding proportion of
recruits from the affected areas, and the fact that thousands of
strikers have sons, brothers and other relatives in the trenches.
The whole thing is almost a judgment on English haphazard
methods, though I know those methods are only the product of our
insular position. After all, we fought Napoleon with almost a
revolution going on in Ireland. And do you remember the Six Acts?
So history repeats itself.
The Germans are still astounding the world. This move on Russia
will, I think, be ranked by military historians in the future as
one of the most immense things in the story of the war--a
parallel, but on a far larger scale, with the French and our own
advance from the Marne to the Aisne. Unfortunately, I am afraid
the Germans will be more successful than we were on that
occasion--for we only drove them back 20 or 30 miles, but the
Germans now seem to be menacing two great cities, half a dozen
first-class fortresses, and four vital railway lines. There is no
doubt that they, at least, are not playing at war. And to think
that it should be Wales that may be half-crippling the Navy when
we are matched with such a foe! If the Navy fails, then Heaven
help us! I don't think we can lose even now, but I doubt now if
Germany can lose. It may be 1793-1815 over again!
Don't imagine that economics end war. Nations can easily do
without trade if they will. To win a war, in ninety-nine cases
out of a hundred, you have to beat the enemy's forces decisively
in the field and put large bodies of his troops permanently out
of action, or capture important tracts of territory such as corn
land or mining districts, without which he cannot wage the war.
Nothing has done us more harm than all this talk about
"attrition." People say, "Oh, it's all right, we can strangle
Germany by means of our Navy, and only time is wanted." As a
matter of fact, Germany is so well prepared by environment,
history, and her own endeavours for such a war that were Berlin
itself in our hands, I would not like to say we should have won.
Berlin has in the past been entered by the enemy, and yet the
Germans have defeated their foes. Look at Frederick the Great--he
won his wars with half his own country in the enemy's hands. Make
no mistake, we shall have to cut the German Army to pieces if we
are to win. And we shall not succeed, at least not for any
practical purpose, unless we put every man into his right place
to win the war. We want the shell-makers at home, the soldiers in
the field, the mere politician on the scrap-heap, and capable men
at the head of affairs. There must be no more of this muddling
War Office policy, no more of this defective control of vital
industries and these scandalous deficiencies in equipment.
WITH THE 9th CAVALRY BRIGADE
On July 27, 1915, Paul Jones left Waterloo Station for service abroad.
Shortly after his arrival in France he was ordered to proceed to the
Headquarters of the 9th Cavalry Brigade (1st Cavalry Division), having
been appointed Requisitioning Officer to the Brigade. His thorough
knowledge of French was the determining factor in securing him this
appointment, a very responsible one for a youth of 19.
_August 5th, 1915._
At length a chance to write a letter home. I seem to have been
travelling for weeks, and I had no time for anything but hasty
postcards. My address may not convey much geographically, but I
will take the risk of saying that I am very far up country,
and--which of course pleases me immensely--not many miles from
the real Front. My work involves a great deal of French
conversation and much riding and motoring. I am, in fact, a
Requisitioning Officer, a title which almost explains itself.
The journey up from the base seemed absolutely endless, but was
never lacking in interest, so much was there to see. The glorious
spirits of our men would be a lesson to the Jeremiahs at home.
Never had I expected, never could I believe possible, that such a
wonderfully jovial spirit could prevail among men going to
certain danger and hardship and possible death. I saw a lot of
Welshmen on the way, and wherever one met them they were singing
in those gloriously rich Welsh voices.
How kind-hearted our soldiers are I realised on my journey up.
Frequently alongside the railway line were groups of French
kiddies shouting, "Souvenirs!" "Souvenirs!" In response our
fellows were chucking out to them from the train all sorts of
things, bully beef, bread, biscuits, etc., and laughing and
chatting at the windows. What a diversity of tongues and accents
among our soldiers! Cockney, Lancashire, Scotch, Welsh and West
Country were easily recognisable. For cheerfulness and kindness
you will never match the British Tommy.
I don't see so very much difference between the new and the old
France, except for the greater number of uniforms; the same gay
old cafe-life goes on as always.
Only four out of the fifteen A.S.C. officers who left London on
Monday last came up-country, and I was one of the four. Eureka!
also Banzai! There ought to be a chance of some excitement,
anyhow. I am in glorious health and spirits and feel very pleased
with life. Isn't it fine that my desire to be really close to the
thick of things should be so fully gratified? Tell Hal I had two
delightful swims at the base.
_August 9th, 1915._
My mare is temporarily _hors de combat_ with a cut on the hock.
This is a nuisance, as I have now to rely on the hospitality of
other officers in lending me either their horses or their
motor-cars, or, alternatively, go about on a push-bike when I
have to travel far afield, which happens almost daily. Before the
week is out I am expecting to go right up into the firing-line.
One is astounded at the off-hand manner in which officers who
have been in the trenches take the most hair-raising adventures.
An artillery officer was telling us to-day with the utmost
sang-froid of the difficulty he and his comrades had in eating
their dinner when poison-gas was blowing about. The gas made
their eyes water to such a degree that everybody at the mess
seemed to be weeping bitterly. He also told us that for a long
time they had had no need of reveille, as the Boches had a habit
of dropping a Jack Johnson near by every morning at 6.15
punctually. In the short time I have been out here I have been
struck with the glorious English coolness and the steadfast
refusal to get flurried that marks all our tribe.
In our relations with the inhabitants of the countryside we show
consideration and strict honesty. Every bit of damage done is
compensated, every blade of grass is paid for, although
necessarily we have first to investigate the validity of claims
for damage. The whole thing is very characteristic of British
integrity. I am going very strong and gradually getting the hang
of my work, which is decidedly interesting.
We had a remarkable concert the other night. The whole
thing--stage, paints, wigs, orchestra, curtains, scenery,
everything--was got up by the 1st Cavalry Division Supply Column,
and most of the performers were A.S.C. men. The most popular
vocalist turned up on his own, however, viz. Captain the Maclean,
of Lochbuie (of the 19th Hussars), who is quite an artist in his
way. This gay, debonair Scotsman is simply worshipped by the men.
One of the latter (himself holding the D.C.M. and the French
Medaille Militaire for conspicuous bravery at Landrecies) told me
Maclean was the bravest man he had ever seen; he is always at the
head of a rush whether on horseback or on foot, and invariably
goes into action with a hunting-crop.
A French Territorial Infantry Regiment marched into the town
yesterday. They all wore the new grey uniform that is superseding
the red trousers and blue tunics of the old days. Quite an
interesting spectacle! But for sheer beauty you should see our
cavalry on the move. A wonderful sight, I assure you, even
without all the gay accoutrements of the Military Tournament. In
fact, to my mind, the field-dress makes the affair even more
impressive. The horses are simply beauties, and every one of them
is in perfect condition.
I have met an old Bedfordian among the cavalry. We have had many
a chat comparing notes as to the past, especially in regard to
the fierce-fought struggles of old between Bedford and the
Blue-and-Blacks. We hope to get some sort of Rugger up when the
winter comes, though of course a very great proportion of the
cavalry officers are men from Eton, Harrow, Winchester and other
schools where, I regret to say, the game of games is not played!
They will have to be taught.
_August 13th, 1915._
A lot of cavalry men are up trench-digging and I have had my
first experience of being up really close to the firing-line. It
doesn't take one long to get from here to the thick of things,
and we were soon apprised of the fact by heavy and ponderous
crashes. Just above us a British aeroplane was winging its flight
towards the German lines. Presently one saw small flashes of
flame in the air all around it, followed by curious little puffs
of smoke; then came the sound of exploding shells; you know that
light travels faster than sound. The Boches were potting at the
'plane. However, the British airman was easily able to clear
away. After this, a Taube came in our direction and our artillery
was having pots at it. Pursued by two British 'planes the Taube
turned tail and skedaddled, passing exactly over our car. I
wonder it didn't buzz a bomb at us, for the road was crowded with
cars, lorries, waggons, and columns of marching soldiers. But it
didn't, and went off as fast as it could lick.
We soon reached a village which, during the previous day, had
been subjected to a mild bombardment. The results even of a few
shells were staggering. A large number of the houses and the
village church were shattered into atoms; nothing left but heaps
of bricks, with here and there a wall standing amid the debris.
To me it was a remarkable spectacle, though my companions assured
me that this village was in a positively palatial condition
compared to other places farther up. Just as we reached the
troops we were destined for, an appalling crash rent the air, and
went echoing away like a peal of thunder. It was the British
heavy artillery at work, though we couldn't see any batteries.
Meanwhile the Boches were aiming at our aeroplanes which were
flying above us continually. Amid all this our fellows were quite
unmoved, and an exciting game of Soccer was in progress, every
successful effort being cheered to the echo by the soldier
spectators. And that, mind, though only last night the Boches put
twenty-eight of our men out of action not far from this very
spot, landing three shells on top of them at midnight, killing
one and wounding twenty-seven others, not to mention several
horses.
Our route now lay along a road roughly parallel to the
firing-lines, and only a few miles behind them. We passed several
camps, where all sorts of regiments were quartered. Then we came
to quite a big town, which was packed with lorries and field
ambulances, and with columns of British soldiers, always
cheerful, though in many cases much fatigued. Finally we came
back to our quarters. To me the whole experience was most
interesting and exciting, and I am eagerly looking forward to a
repetition of it. Next time I shall go right up to the real
centre of things. It is great to be so near the scrapping, and I
only hope a chance of real fighting does come my way. Anyhow, I
am ready to do my duty, whatever it may be.
Well, the Germans have got that Petrograd-Warsaw railway.
Apparently some people anticipate an advance on Petrograd itself.
The war is assuming a phase very like that of the Napoleonic
struggles. I hope 1812 repeats itself, but candidly I don't think
that the Boches will put their heads into the lion's mouth by
risking an advance into Russia with winter coming on.
TO HIS BROTHER
_August 18th, 1915._
I am very busy, but my work is becoming more and more
interesting, and I am about in the open air almost all the time.
To-day I have had a twenty-mile horse-ride. My little mare ran
like clockwork. She is a gem of a horse. I am hoping also to get
some motor driving. There is no speed limit here. Talk about
express trains! No; Rugby football is not much appreciated by the
9th Brigade. Cavalry officers swear by polo. To see them play a
polo match is a sheer delight, for they are the best horsemen in
the world.
Many men of our Cavalry Division are at present employed in
making a reserve line of trenches some distance behind the real
article. Our own brigade is digging vigorously in the grounds of
a fine old chateau. The Supply Officer and I, as his understudy,
go up continually in a car conveying special supplies and to do
various other duties. The chateau grounds are well within enemy
gun range, and most of the neighbouring buildings have been blown
to atoms. Yesterday the first news that greeted us from the
trench-diggers was that they had been bombarded that morning by
gas shells, among other pleasant surprises. While we were
pursuing our duties I heard a boom, followed by a long, sighing
screech, then a violent crash about fifty yards off. It was a
German shell. Another and yet another followed. Suddenly an
R.A.M.C. man came running up to fetch a stretcher--someone had
been knocked out. As the nearest man at hand I joined him in
carrying the stretcher, and we doubled our fastest for the trees
where the first shot had pitched. We found that an R.A.M.C. man
had been struck above the ankle by a piece of shrapnel. The wound
was small, but deep and ugly, and the leg was broken. The poor
chap was in terrible pain. We conveyed him as carefully as we
could to the field ambulance. There had been other casualties
hereabouts in the morning.
More and more shells, and then a lull. After this exhibition of
afternoon hate, we took tea with some officers of the 15th
Hussars in a tent in the chateau grounds. It was a delicious
meal, and was not interrupted, though enemy shells from time to
time shot over our heads and exploded some distance away in the
woods behind. The ineffectiveness of the enemy shelling was
greeted every time there was an explosion by cat-calls, shouts
and whistling on the part of our imperturbable soldiers. Then the
enemy diverted his guns to a village through which our return
road ran. On our approaching this place we found our way barred
by military policemen, who informed us the traffic was
temporarily held up, and that we would have to seek our
destination by another and a more devious route. Looking back,
one is amused at the nonchalance of this tea in the open with the
Hussar officers, while German missiles were shooting over our
heads and crashing to earth a couple of hundred yards away. Had
the enemy shortened the range we should all have gone up among
the little birds.
Did you see that splendid joke in _Punch_--an old man talking to
a very badly wounded Irish soldier swathed in bandages from head
to foot? The former says, "This is a terrible war, isn't it, my
man?" Pat replies, "Yes, sorr, it is that; a rale tirrible war.
But faith! 'tis better than no war at all." Capital, and so
deliciously Irish!
_August 23rd, 1915._
Excessively busy days these--out sometimes from nine in the
morning till about ten at night, often missing meals perforce. A
few days back I was in the city whose name practically sums up
the character of British fighting--Ypres. Never have I seen such
a picture of desolation. Not a house standing; only skeletons of
buildings, shattered walls, and gaping window openings, from
which all vestige of glass has long since disappeared. The Church
and the Cloth Hall are simply piles of debris. To walk along the
streets is like a kind of nightmare, even when the Boches are not
indulging in a spell of hate against the place. Talk of
Pompeii--why, this puts it quite among the "also-rans." What a
pathetic spectacle to see a whole city in ruins! Stupefaction and
sadness at the wholesale destruction is my impression of this
melancholy ruin of an historic town.
Having seen my rations delivered to our regiments, I and my
companions (two Hussar officers) visited a battery of 5-inch
howitzers at work not far off, through the medium of a friendly
Artillery officer. Their headquarters have been amazingly lucky
in not being hit up to date. They told us that there was going to
be great "strafing" that night, that the Boches were very good
gunners, but that they and the French sometimes became
quarrelsome and loosed off at each other like fury for a short
time, both sides doing very little real damage. As we were
chatting a long whistle-blast betokened the presence of a Taube,
and our companions quickly dragged us out of sight into a
dug-out, lest the enemy airman should spot men about and send
back the range. You must understand that the guns are so
concealed that it is almost impossible to see them even when you
know where they are located. After the aerial visitor cleared
off, we had a great tea, with all the ground about us shaking to
the reverberation of the battery discharges. Presently a
long-drawn-out screech in the distance, and a fearful crash in
the middle distance. "That's Percy again!" said the Artillery
officer. We found that "Percy" is the name for a German
17-incher, which frequently drops shells ten miles behind our
lines. The smallest crater made by his shells would accommodate a
locomotive engine with ease. "Percy" is no doubt "some gun," as
the Yankees would say. It was a curious sensation to walk about
the fields with shells from both sides flying over one's head.
Some gas shells had been discharged that day, and the air in
places was quite heavy with the odour of them--not unpleasant to
smell, but most mephitic, and apt to make your eyes water.
Whom do you think I met on the main road up to-day? None other
than Reggie Lloyd, who was one of my best pals at Dulwich. Our
car was moving very fast and overtook his. I stopped and jumped
out, and we exchanged a firm handshake and a few words before we
had to be moving on again "in the cause of duty." He is a second
lieutenant in the R.E., and looked thundering fit. To-day I saw
him again. On this occasion he was moving about fifty miles an
hour on a motor-bike, and we only had time for a hand-wave as
we passed. What a thrill to meet an old pal like that out here in
the fire zone!
_August 28th, 1915._
To go up the road from here to the firing-line is a great
experience. You see, as you pass along, all the multifarious
items of army organisation--long lines of lorries, horsed-wagons,
limbers, guns, columns of marching men, motor-cars by the score,
French soldiers, British soldiers, aeroplanes spinning merrily
overhead--truly a wonderful spectacle. You have no conception of
the abominable state of the main roads out here. The _pave_ road,
peculiar to these parts, is always a bone-shaker at the best of
times, but now, after the passage of so much heavy traffic, it is
simply appalling. A curious feature is the extraordinary
straightness of the main roads, down which you can literally see
for miles. The by-roads, on the other hand, seem to abound in
right-angled turns, and it is not an easy matter to drive a car
along at any considerable rate of speed.
My knowledge of French has come in very useful indeed, but for
these outlying country districts a knowledge of Flemish would be
even more valuable. Many persons about here speak not one word of
French, and Flemish is almost always used by the people _en
famille_. It is a kind of mixture of low German and middle
English. I can usually get at people's meanings, and even make
them understand mine, by a jargon embracing sometimes words from
Chaucer and sometimes a little German. Listening to the language
when spoken one is reminded of rather nasal Welsh. There is a
distinct resemblance between the general sound of Welsh and
Flemish in conversation.
These parts constitute one of the most Catholic districts in
Europe; the people are quite as devout as those of the south of
Ireland. Wherever you go on the roads you are confronted with
shrines--little structures with an altar, holy images, etc., that
can be seen through a glass window barred across with slender
pieces of iron. Above the door is an admonition urging the
passer-by to stop and say an "Ave" or a "Pater." All the
dedications to saints and the Virgin are in Latin. For example,
this is a very common heading for a shrine, "_Ave, Maria, gratiae
plena._" I have also seen shrines dedicated to some of those old
chaps that Dad is so interested in--Antony of Padua, Francis of
Assisi, etc. All over the place you meet, stuck in boxes with
glass fronts and mounted on poles, tiny waxen images of various
saints, or Christ on the Cross, the Virgin Mary, etc., etc. When
a native comes to one of these shrines or images, he pulls off
his hat, crosses himself, repeats a prayer, and passes on,
probably confident that his sins are forgiven. Everybody goes to
Mass at the church of his commune at seven o'clock each morning,
and often in the evening as well--on Sunday about three times.
Church spires are about the only landmarks in this very flat and
rather uninteresting country. The towers vary between the square
and the spire. The church itself is always large and quite
imposing. You don't see churches of anything like the same size
in English villages of corresponding population. A common sight
as you ride along these roads is to see the cure, dressed in a
long black surtout and a huge wide-brimmed hat just like "Don
Bartola," the music-master in the opera of _Il Barbiere de
Siviglia_. The cure gravely salutes you as you pass by, "Bon
jour, mon ami!"
I am billeted with very decent folk, extremely devout Catholics.
The old man is the secretary to the Mayor. He spends his spare
time learning English, and can read an English newspaper quite
well. My room is of the kind I like--plain, with two huge windows
opening like folding-doors, and only a tiny carpet to attract the
dust; the rest clean, bare boards. In the room are two waxen
images, one of the Virgin and Child, and one of Christ carrying a
child in His arms; also a waxen model in a case of glass of the
Virgin and Child, besides no fewer than three crucifixes. This is
only characteristic of the whole village: every room I've seen
hereabouts seems crowded with images. There are lots of these
images, chipped and smashed, lying about the streets of Ypres. I
suppose where you are at present [Scotland] everybody is a
Presbyterian and very much against all ritual. There is at least
this resemblance between Scot and Flemish: they both call the
church "kirk" or "kerque." It is rather amusing to think that,
according to the ideas of some English Churchmen, both Scottish
Presbyterian and Flemish Catholic are lost for ever; while the
Baptist of Llanelly is equally convinced that all three of them
are; and each imagines the other to be hopelessly wrong. The war
has this advantage: that it cuts athwart of all such ridiculous
distinctions--for have we not among the Allies English Churchmen
and Nonconformists, Catholics, Mohammedans, Hindus and secular
Frenchmen, all fighting on the one side against another side
which includes Catholics, Protestants and Mohammedans? I say what
matter what a man believes if he does his duty?
The last two or three days I have spent in more or less local
work, meaning by that districts within about ten miles of
headquarters. I have been in the saddle all day, from 9 _A.M._ to
7 _P.M._, the only interval being for lunch. Riding is glorious
sport. I don't think I shall ever be able to live without a horse
in the future. I have been using here one of my own mares, and
a fine charger belonging to a 9th Lancer employed at H.Q. (you
remember it was this regiment that made the famous charge at Le
Cateau back in October). It is a glorious steed this, full of
"devil," and a bit bad-tempered. My own big mare is a rather
quiet horse, very good at trotting long distances; my other one
is smaller but more fiery. I prefer to ride whenever possible a
horse that really takes some managing.
_September 8th, 1915._
I am glad you are invigorated and pleased with your trip to the
land of Burns and Harry Lauder. The Scottish Highlands are the
exact opposite of these flat plains. Never in my life have I seen
a district so absolutely level as this. There are but three hills
in these parts, and these are the only landmarks for miles and
miles. Otherwise every road is like every other, every field and
every clump of trees the same. The roads are all either dead
straight or, in the case of side roads, full of right-angle
bends. There is nothing of that sinuous curving which
characterises English country roads. As you get nearer the
firing-line the roads become worse owing to the passage of Army
traffic, till finally they end up in mere broad tracks full of
holes and humps. When the weather is bad the mud is
appalling--even the Dulwich footer-ground variety comes a bad
second--added to which there is, in the case of main roads, the
nuisance of a most unlevel _pave_, which, it is true, keeps free
from mud, but to travel along which in a motor-car is torture.
The way the Army lorries go bumping along--many of them old
motor-buses with the top parts discarded--is stupendous. It is a
strange sight occasionally to see approaching you a real
motor-bus, painted grey and full of Tommies. I almost stopped
one the other day, near the fire zone, and asked to be taken to
Oxford Circus; it all seemed so familiar.
The news from Russia isn't very inspiriting. It looks as if Riga
and Rovno will follow in the wake of Warsaw and Novo-Georgievsk.
Not that the mere capture of a town means anything in itself, but
the Boches must be getting a store of ammunition and guns through
their successes. Still, it might be that 1812 would repeat
itself, though I fear the Germans have studied history too well
to fall into the pit that destroyed Napoleon. _Nous verrons._
I went down the other day to an advanced Field Supply Depot. I
often think of the steady flow of goods across the Channel from
the home port where I began my Army experience, and the vastness
of the silent work behind the scenes that is needed to keep the
Army going. You would be amazed to find how little is known even
in the A.S.C. itself of that which I have been privileged to see.
It has a spice of romance about it, this moving of vast stores
from England to the trenches. Out here one gets fresh bread and
meat regularly. There are also ample supplies of preserved meat.
As for "bully" beef, it is rare good stuff, and I am by no means
averse from the hard Army biscuit.
It is the chief part of my duties to make local purchases or
requisitions of goods as they are needed. Local resources are
always used to the utmost, though G.H.Q. is careful to insist on
all goods being duly paid for, or an official requisition-note
being handed to the seller. You will realise that in this sort of
work I get a lot of practice in French. The French spoken in
these parts is very thick, quite different from the metallic
French of Paris.
I am told that when we are moving in the field, cavalry go twice
as fast as any other branch of the Service. When we begin to
move, my job will be really most exciting and interesting, as I
shall have to be right on ahead with a store of supplies, bought,
requisitioned, or obtained somehow, to keep things going till the
ordinary service of lorries and horsed wagons adapts itself to
the new conditions. Whatever happens I hope to see some sport.
I get on excellently with the cavalry officers. They have a
bright charm of their own and are absolutely fearless. Most of
them are descendants of the old English and Scottish chivalry.
They are intensely Conservative in opinion, not over
intellectual, but men with fine traditions and noble instincts.
They have a passion for horses and all things equine.
_September 16th, 1915._
So you have had an experience of the Zepps. I am glad London bore
it philosophically. I never imagined that it would be possible
seriously to perturb the people of England by this species of
frightfulness. As Dad puts it, "Curiosity quite mastered every
sense of fear," but if the Zepps. are to continue paying visits
to our suburb, you may have to evacuate 198 and dig yourselves in
in the garden with communicating trenches leading from your
dug-outs to Croxted Road and Herne Hill.
It is splendid how our fellows keep rolling up to fight, for,
believe me, the war is no joke out here. Very few people who have
been out think it's all a death-or-glory sort of business. On the
contrary, it is a steady and persistent strain, a strain under
which the strongest nerves are apt to give way after a time--I am
talking, of course, of the trenches. When the cavalry go into
action as cavalry, they are bound to suffer fearfully, being so
exposed, but there's no doubt that they will do their job, and
put a still greater number of the Boches out of action. This is a
war in which there is nothing picturesque or romantic. It takes
all the cheerfulness of the British Tommy to overmaster the
grinding strain of trench warfare, though as man is by nature a
fighter, he presently begins to throw off the trammels of
civilisation and live _a la naturelle_. The British soldier has
done marvels in this war. Nothing but his irrepressible spirits
and lion-hearted courage would have held up this great host of
Boches armed with new and strange implements of war and with
every weapon known to science.
_September 18th, 1915._
In an interval of relaxation, our division gave a Horse Show
to-day. To these cavalrymen, horses are as meat and drink, almost
the one topic of their conversation, at once their delight and
their business. A lot of notabilities from various places in
France came up to see the Show. It was the most magnificent
display of horseflesh I have ever seen. It was held in a large
open field. The programme included competitions for officers' and
troopers' horses (light and heavy), driving for the limbers of
the regiment, work by machine-gun sections, races, jumping,
turn-out of A.S.C. wagons, and what-not. A wonderful display was
that of the officers' chargers, in which the long line of
competitors rode, trotted and galloped past the General who was
judging. Some of the men's horses were also very good, and really
ran the officers' chargers close for merit. The first three
prize-winners would be worth a clear L450 apiece. To describe the
efficiency of the wagon-driving, the smartness of their turn-out,
the quickness and neatness of all their manoeuvres, is beyond me.
There was no lance or sword play. The whole business had been
arranged to see that everything was as efficient as possible, and
to promote a spirit of healthy rivalry among the different
regiments. It was an extraordinary spectacle, not fifteen miles
from the firing-line, with the big guns booming in one's ears the
whole time--very characteristic of the Englishman's love of sport
and its value to the nation. This is one of the things that the
Boches never can, or will be able to, understand. They cannot
realise how these "mad English" can forget the War when in the
middle of it, and when any minute their "sport" might be
interrupted by a "Jack Johnson." I was with our Brigade
Veterinary Officer, who, of course, is an equine expert. It was a
treat to hear him telling off the points of the magnificent
chargers passing in front of us, pawing the ground and snorting,
full of dash and fire. To me the whole affair had a profound
interest. I have never enjoyed myself more, and really its
psychological significance was immense.
On the morning of 25th September, 1915, the 1st and 4th Corps of the
British Army delivered an attack on the enemy line between La Bassee
Canal on the north and a point opposite the village of Grenay on the
south. There were subsidiary simultaneous attacks east of Ypres by the
5th Corps, and north of the La Bassee Canal by the 3rd and the Indian
Corps. Our main attack was made in co-operation with the French
offensive on our right. The British Cavalry Corps was posted in the
neighbourhood of St. Pol and Bailleul-les-Pernes, in readiness to
co-operate with the French Cavalry in pushing home any success which
might be attained by the combined offensive.
_September 23rd, 1915._
I am about to leave on an official mission, the nature of which I
cannot disclose to you for the time being. My kit has had to be
sent away, and I am only equipped with things I can carry about
me or in my saddle-wallets on the horses. Revolver, haversack,
official books, map-case and respirator are slung about my body.
It is fine to be independent of trunks. Last night I bivouacked
in a field, and one day I was quartered in a mining village which
before the war must have been a busy place. It reminded me very
much of the outskirts of Llanelly. I am feeling better in health
and spirits than ever before.
An article by a Liberal M.P. that appeared recently in the _Daily
Chronicle_ annoyed me very much. Previously I had imagined the
writer to be rather a sportsman and a game fighter; but his
insulting references in this article to the "good fellows" in the
trenches, who are "excellent in their time and place," etc.,
simply set my teeth on edge. I know full well that the type of
thing that he calls "a voice from the trenches" is only an
exploitation of sensational newspapers, as Tommy never by any
chance in my experience of him talks of subjects like
conscription. But the sheer cruelty of this M.P.'s patronising
talk of the men who are dying by thousands to keep him and his
kind safe at home absolutely surpasses everything. The suggestion
that the man at the Front knows less of how to run wars than
M.P.s who have, in all probability, never seen a drop of blood
shed or a gun fired in anger in their lives, is, on the face of
it, ludicrous. We have heard a lot about the Army not interfering
in politics. Well and good; but let the politicians cease to
meddle with military affairs, unless, of course, it is manifest
that the most sacred civil rights of the people are being
sacrificed to a caucus of officers, like those who tried to hold
up the Home Rule Bill.
To-day a big detachment of German prisoners was brought into the
village. They were well dressed and equipped, and in reasonably
good spirits.
_October 3rd, 1915._
Life continues to use me well, though in the last week or two I
have been all-ends up with work. I have usually managed to keep
fairly dry, but the weather is awful, and despite mackintoshes
and greatcoats galore, I have been absolutely soaked on more than
one occasion, especially one night about four days back, when I
had to sleep in the open on a heath in pouring rain, and with a
bitter wind blowing. However, one thinks but little of that sort
of thing when campaigning, and I have never been better in
health.
I wish I could describe to you some of the scenes I witnessed
during the past week, above all, on that never-to-be-forgotten
day before the great attack was made. We found ourselves moving
along the same road as the Guards--Grenadiers, Scots, and
Welsh--who were going up to the attack (the Welsh Guards had
never been in action before, having only recently been
constituted, but I hear they did great things). Never had I seen
such a sight as that evening before the attack. On one side of
the road our cavalry, on the other the Guardsmen, all moving
forward to the accompaniment of the sound of guns booming
sullenly ahead. We halted for a time beside a detachment of Life
Guards, among whom I recognised an old Alleynian named Kemp, whom
I had not seen since last October. We had a few minutes' pleasant
conversation before passing on with our respective columns.
A day or two ago I was to have gone right up to the battlefield
with supplies, but a sudden change in orders made it impossible.
However, a number of our lot were up there. They tell me it was a
fearful scene--the ground littered with corpses, and all the
debris of a battlefield scattered around. I was bitterly
disappointed at not getting right up, but duty is duty, and I
had orders to do other things. We all hope that the day of the
great move forward has now begun to dawn, but there's no doubt it
will be a devil of a job, as the Boches are fighting like hell to
regain the lost ground. All yesterday, last night and this
morning the guns have been rumbling away with more than usual
vigour.
One day last week I visited a soldiers' cemetery; it was chiefly
used for men who have died of wounds at a casualty clearing
station near by. A most mournful and yet most impressive
spectacle it was. As I returned I saw long strings of ambulances
coming down from the Front--a sight that spoke eloquently of the
toll that this war is taking of our best. I note you say that the
new Welsh Division will be going out presently, either to France
or to the Dardanelles. I hope that they will prove worthy of the
great name that the Welsh have made for themselves in this war.
Yesterday I chatted with a Welshman from Pontypridd, a Regular in
the First South Wales Borderers. He had been out here right from
the very start, had been twice wounded, and, except for one
convalescent period of a fortnight, had had no leave at all.
Chris Fowkes, who was wounded some time back, was in the same
company as this sturdy Welshman.[1]
[Footnote 1: Fowkes was a contemporary of Paul's at Dulwich.]
_October 6th, 1915._
The general impression here now is that the advance is proving a
very tough proposition. The casualty list is of colossal
dimensions. All the signs point to a long war.
A French interpreter is attached to each battalion of British
infantry, or regiment of cavalry, with a liaison officer, or
interpreter officer, attached to each brigade in addition.
Personally, I have never found any need for an interpreter's
services. I am able to make almost any of my requirements
comprehensible to the inhabitants, and I think I may describe
myself as being really fluent in French by this time. It is
perfectly amazing how few of our people can talk any other
language than their own.
That was a piquant incident at the College as described by Hal. A
little dash of unconventionality like that is wanted in Dulwich
and in all Public Schools. They, like other national
institutions, are terribly prone to get into a groove. Though
that groove be a good one, yet an occasional lift out of it can
do no harm. But there's no doubt about it that, conservative
though they may be, our Public Schools have done marvellously in
this war. The system has proved its value ten thousand times
over, and never so much as on these gory plains of Flanders and
the hilly crags of Gallipoli. Of late the officer casualties have
been fearful, and most of them these days seem to be killed, not
wounded.
So Bulgaria seems determined to come in against us. If this means
that Roumania and Greece join us, I don't see why the Germans
should be so keen on enlisting the Bulgars on their side. Funny,
isn't it, how all Europe is falling into the whirlpool of war?
Every one of the little States finds that the war is a chance for
it to get something out of someone else--hence its decision to
join in. I hope our Government won't go sending big forces out to
Albania or Salonika, or such places, unless and until they are
sure it would be to England's benefit. For the life of me, I
can't see why we should carry these footling little nations on
our shoulders. All they do is to turn on you as soon as your back
is turned, as _vide_ the Bulgars themselves. The end of it all is
that everyone is scrapping against someone else for some selfish
aim, and the main object and high ideals for which we entered
the war are wholly forgotten.
I cannot describe to you the muddy conditions out here. Mud lies
inches thick on the roads, and is kept damp and slimy by the
continual passage of limbers, horses, guns, wagons and
lorries--the final result being a veritable swamp. The other day
a man of the 19th Hussars was watering two horses when he got
himself and the two animals hopelessly bogged beside the pond in
a swamp which he mistook for dry ground. Eventually we tugged him
and the two horses out with ropes. They were all soaked with
slime and mud from head to foot. As for the infantrymen, when
they come out of the trenches, they are caked in mud all over. In
these parts mud is the great feature of the war.
_October 11th, 1915._
I continue to be very busy. You must understand that it is my job
to supplement the ordinary supplies that come up on the Supply
Column from the railway with supplies obtained locally. These
latter are frequently as essential as the former. Especially is
this the case with cavalry, who are naturally apt, when moving,
to get separated from their supplies, owing to the rapidity of
their progress. Then comes the Requisitioning Officer's real
task. That is not to say that this is the only case in which he
has to work. On the contrary, the work is absolutely continuous.
The men always want all sorts of things that the Supply Column
does not provide, and it is up to me to get those things, and
what is more, in most cases, to transport them also. I am in
charge of a number of wagons, limbers, etc., to carry out this
latter job, and I am responsible for the care and transport of
the ordinary supplies for our Brigade Headquarters after they
leave the Supply Column. I have also to do the following jobs:
(1) Distribute pay to the large number of A.S.C. men attached to
Headquarters; (2) when we are in billets, to see to the billeting
arrangements for the brigade, and adjust the relations between
the troops and whatever inhabitants there may be.
You must not imagine that there are no inhabitants in these
districts. On the contrary, it is my experience that people cling
to their homes and lead their ordinary lives right up into the
fire zone. Our authorities take the greatest care not to offend
the inhabitants. Let me give you an illustration. Recently we
were at a small village, now quite blown to atoms, and considered
a hot spot even out here, and which really has no inhabitants.
Well, on the occasion of entrenching operations our chaps found
it necessary to take some doors from ruined houses. They wanted
the timber for planks for trench supports and dug-outs. Though
all the inhabitants had fled or been killed long before, and the
village was little better than a dust-heap, yet a solemn and
portentous court of inquiry was held on those doors: were we
justified in taking them, and should payment be made for them to
the old inhabitants or their representatives? Eventually it was
decided that, as the doors were taken to help to make trenches,
they might be considered as destroyed by a _fait de guerre_,
which, I believe, corresponds to an "act of God" in the civil
courts, and payment ought not therefore to be made for the doors.
It was, however, pointed out that if the said doors had been used
to make a road, not a trench, they would not be _faits de
guerre_, and in such case payment would have had to be made to
the Mayor of the destroyed commune!
"Business as usual" is the motto they try to live up to
throughout these parts, and every effort is made to persuade
people that the war is only a sort of accident. Money remains
money, and there are people selling and buying right up to
places where many lives are lost every day. The position is
really almost that described in a _Bystander_ cartoon, depicting
a peasant standing above a line of our trenches amid a hell of
shot and bursting shrapnel, and saying, "Messieurs, I am
desolated to trouble you, but I must request you to fight in my
other field, as I plough this one to-day." By the way, _The
Bystander_ has succeeded, as no other paper save perhaps _Punch_
has done, in catching the atmosphere that exists out here.
I assure you that just behind the firing-line people are minting
money out of our occupation. Not only do they get paid regularly
if British troops are billeted on them, but they can name their
own prices for milk, beer, eggs, etc., and all those other things
that Tommy is anxious for, and for which he can afford to pay. He
is, I think, paid three times as much as either the French or the
Boche soldiers. True, I have met some pitiful cases of
refugeeism, but to a very large number of people in Northern
France the war is nothing but somewhat of a nuisance. Of course,
where they do feel it is in their own terrible casualty lists. I
have known family after family in the little villages who have
lost one or two sons. In many communes one finds that the Mayor
has been killed while serving at the front, and a deputy acts in
his stead. The Mayor of the place where we are now stationed has
three sons fighting, one at Verdun. I had an agreeable chat a few
days back with the local schoolmaster, who was home on short
leave from the trenches.
It is curious that only _The Bystander_ and _Punch_ should have
succeeded in catching the atmosphere of "Somewhere in France."
Many of the war correspondents, brilliantly though they write,
have missed it altogether. John Buchan is not so bad, when he
writes soberly, but he will let his imagination run away with
him. Talking of writers, what a delightful thing was that article
of Zangwill's in the _Daily Chronicle_ on "The Perils of Walking
in War-time"! Its brilliant satire, firm grasp of facts, lively
humour and racy style quite took my fancy.
I have had some interesting chats with some of the old soldiers
in our division about Mons, the Marne and the Aisne, and all
"those brave days of old." One chap, now acting as a clerk at
Headquarters, wears the ribbons of the D.C.M. and French Medaille
Militaire for swimming a river (on the retreat from Mons) amid a
tempest of shot and shell, and giving warning to a party of our
people on the other side who were in the greatest danger of being
surrounded--and quite oblivious of the fact--by the Boches who
had forced the passage of a bridge some way off. This brave
fellow led his menaced comrades to another bridge, and so enabled
them all to get clear.
The Supply Officer of one of our brigades is F. P. Knox, a
Dulwich man, who captained the old school at cricket back in 1895
or so and I believe led Oxford to victory after that. His brother
you may know--N. A. Knox, the famous fast bowler.
I was horrified to see in a recent casualty list among the killed
the name of Second Lieutenant H. O. Beer. I remember him as a
rather clever, quiet, inoffensive, distinctly popular fellow in
Doulton's House. He left at the end of July, 1914, without
getting any colours, but after doing quite well in all games. He
won a Junior Scholarship, but failed to get a Senior. He was made
a School Prefect in September, 1913, and you will see him in the
very middle of the back row of the photo of the Prefects that we
have--a markedly good-looking fellow, with light hair brushed
across his forehead. What a wealth of tragedy and yet also of
honour is expressed in the last line of his obituary notice in
_The Times_--"He fell leading his platoon, aged twenty years."
Only yesterday, as it were, we were at school together--I
remember handing him off with great vigour on the football
field--and now! It was just the same with poor Reynolds[2] and
Bray.[3] But I mustn't go on in this strain.
[Footnote 2: James Reynolds, head of the Modern Side for two
years. The first Dulwich boy to take the London B.A. degree
while still at school. Born, 1893. Killed in action in
Belgium, May 2nd, 1915, while serving with the London Rifle
Brigade.]
[Footnote 3: Frederick W. Bray, only son of Mr. W. Bray, West
Norwood. One of the keenest members of the O.A.F.C. Quitting
his engineering studies, he joined the 1st Surrey Rifles at
the outbreak of war. Born, August 26th, 1895. Killed, May
25th, 1915.]
_October 15th, 1915._
The Balkan business is a startling knockout for those enthusiasts
who see in the development of small States salvation for the
world! If people would only accept the fact that this is a
material world they would not be surprised at the situation.
Myself, I consider that our diplomacy has failed, probably
because it did not offer tempting enough bribes to Bulgaria and
Greece. No matter; what is the fate of a few tuppenny-ha'penny
Balkan States, who have never done a thing worth doing, beside
that of the British Empire! Why should we always play the
philanthropic idiot towards all these wretched little nations? As
if any of them--or anyone else, for that matter, in international
politics--knows the meaning of the word gratitude! However
righteous our policy may have been, it doesn't seem to have
worked in South-East Europe, and the Boches appear to have got
home first there. I don't think it is so much a triumph for their
diplomacy as a judgment on the blundering stupidity of ours. But
when all's said and done, the alliance or hostility of a few
Bulgars, Greeks or Roumanians doesn't count for so much, anyhow.
"Come the three corners of the world in arms, and we shall shock
them. Naught shall make us rue, if England to herself do rest but
true."
Have you seen the obituary notices of Captain Osmond Williams,[4]
of the Welsh Guards? His funeral took place not half a mile from
the spot where we were at the time. The 19th Hussars was once his
old regiment, and as he was simply idolised by the men, crowds of
them went to the burial. He had a most romantic career--a career
that might have stepped out of the pages of Scott or Dumas.
[Footnote 4: Son of Sir Osmond Williams, Bart., formerly M.P.
for Montgomeryshire. Served in the South African War, and in
his day was regarded as the most brilliant cavalry subaltern
in the British Army. A severe accident in the hunting-field
compelled him to leave the Army. When war broke out in 1914
he offered his services to the War Office, but was rejected
because physically unfit. He then enlisted as a private
soldier, and by repeated acts of gallantry in the field won
his captaincy.]
Yesterday I played Soccer for Headquarters against the 15th
Hussars. We beat them 2 to 1. However, I can't work up any
enthusiasm for Soccer. Oh! for a real game of Rugger. Still, the
Tommies--the English ones, at least--think Soccer the only game,
so one must cut one's cloth to one's opportunities. It is
something to get a game of any sort out here. Is the October
number of _The Alleynian_ out yet? I hope they keep their war
list up to date. Our Roll of Honour is as good as anybody's, and
should be carefully attended to.
_October 20th, 1915._
Whom do you think I met the other day leading a column of motor
lorries up to our brigade H.Q.? No less a person than G. P. S.
Clark, the centre three-quarter who scored that wonderful try
against Haileybury in my first year in the team--running and
feinting his way through right from his own line. He is a motor
expert, and has been gazetted to the M.T. branch of the A.S.C.
Is there any chance of my getting the post of A.D.C. to a Welsh
brigadier? If the Welsh division is due out presently it would be
rather a good job. But if it involved my coming back to England
for any length of time I wouldn't take it. I am perfectly
satisfied with my present work, but still would very much like to
become a real combatant. Against the defect of short sight I can
put the following points:
(a) Three months of Active Service, almost invariably in the
neighbourhood of the firing-line; on several occasions right up
in it.
(b) I have always been attached to the Headquarters of a Cavalry
Brigade, have been in the closest contact with the Brigade
Staff, and have taken my orders from the Staff Captain direct--a
very large proportion of those orders about real Staff work.
(c) I have now a real linguistic fluency in French; pretty
useful German also.
(d) I have been acting under the supervision of a Supply
Officer, whose work I do when he is away, and I know the system
of transport and supply backwards.
(e) I have a thorough knowledge of how to make up supplies by
requisition and purchase on the countryside.
(f) On the march I move at the head of the limbers which form
the Cavalry Divisional train, and am second in command of them
all, so I know something about that branch of work, too.
(g) I am quite a useful horseman.
You may say on reading the above list of virtues that a glass
case is the right place for me, but I know to the full that if
one wants one of these "knutty" jobs one has to represent oneself
as a sort of little tin god. Now don't imagine that I am
dissatisfied with my present job. I am more than pleased with it;
still I am very keen to become a fighting soldier.
_October 25th, 1915._
My present quarters are in a mill. I have a fine large room, also
first-rate stabling for my horses. Brigade Headquarters are in
one of those magnificent chateaux that are dotted over this part
of France. A gorgeous place it must have been in time of peace,
and so it is now except that it is beginning to show signs of
war-wear and constant use.
I am very bucked with life. All that we would like now would be a
stupendous advance. This nibbling policy is all very well, but it
doesn't suit cavalry.
My horses have just been clipped. It is the customary thing at
this time of year, as horses' coats get very thick, and in
consequence they sweat heavily when on the march. The effect of
clipping is curious in the extreme, as the animal no longer
appears of its original colour, but of the colour of its skin,
i.e., mouse-grey. My mare was originally chestnut; now she is a
dark grey. Horses are much happier with their thick coats off.
The hair will have grown again in a couple of weeks, but it won't
be thick for some time. My mare is a grand horse for steady,
continuous work, also quite a good galloper. I had a gallop for
two furlongs or so the other day with the Staff Captain and the
A.D.C., each mounted on a crack cavalry charger. My mare came in
with the first of them, and had more left in her at the end than
either of the others.
There is no greater mistake than to suppose that the function of
the horse has vanished in modern war. On the contrary, even in
the transport, horses are quite as much used as motors. Horse
transport is not confined to roads, and can pass much more easily
than motor vehicles over rough ground. When you get up near the
front, where the roads are badly cut up, horse transport is not
only desirable but essential. Of course, the motor is absolutely
invaluable for speedy transport. But on the whole one can say
that, except for motor-buses, which sometimes take the men right
up close to the trenches, and except for the ammunition park--a
collection of powerful and very speedy lorries loaded up with
munitions, which has always to be in readiness to dash up to the
front in view of an emergency--except in these cases, it is safe
to say that motor transport ends some miles from the actual
fighting-line, and all the remaining transport is horsed. True,
motor-cars containing Generals on inspection, Supply officers,
etc., go all over the place, often right up behind the
firing-line. Also there are the motor machine-gun cars, and the
armoured cars, which are fighting units proper. But don't for
goodness' sake imagine that the horse is done with in modern war
because of the advent of the motor.
What the motor has done is to alter the whole face of things
because of the extraordinary rapidity with which it enables you
to fling troops or supplies up to the Front or transport them
from point to point. But for the effective use of motor vehicles
you need pretty good roads. You will remember how in the earlier
months of the War, ourselves, the Germans and the French effected
big troop movements simply by motor transport. You will recall
the occasion on which the French flung a force across the suburbs
of Paris and attacked the Boches on the right, thus beginning the
movement known as the Battle of the Marne. Then there was the
occasion when Hindenburg attacked the Russians in October, 1914,
feinting at their left and striking at their right at Tannenberg
with a force of armoured cars, cavalry, and infantry conveyed in
motors. Neither of these movements could have been achieved
before the advent of motor transport. As this war progresses, the
need for really capable and cool-headed motor drivers will
steadily increase. But it will be none the less invaluable to
know how to manage a horse--whether to ride it, drive a wagon, or
ride-and-drive in a limber. One of our limber horses is a grey
captured from the Germans last year. He is a very good worker and
doesn't seem to mind being a prisoner in the least.
I must tell you of a funny incident. That night when we were
sleeping on the heath, which I referred to in a previous letter
(p. 149), our Medical Officer was awakened at 2 A.M. by a frantic
signaller, that is, one of the R.E. motor-cycle dispatch riders.
It was pouring rain at the time and bitterly cold. The signaller
solemnly handed the M.O. an envelope marked "Urgent and Special."
The M.O. opened it, his mind full of visions of men mortally
stricken awaiting immediate attention and of other tragic things.
Judge his astonishment when he found inside the following note
from his O.C.: "Kindly render your monthly inoculation return to
Headquarters before the end of the week." What the M.O. said is
unprintable, as this return had already been sent in, and, in any
case, is just a formality of no importance to anybody.
My affection for the British soldier deepens the more I know of
him. To a student of human nature it is an everlasting joy to get
Tommy to tell you his experiences in his own inimitable language,
interspersed with all sorts of gory adjectives. It is so
different from and better than the sort of thing you read in the
Society papers. Human nature as it really is comes out strongly
in these splendid men at the Front. A talk with Tommy is of
intense interest to a chap as keen as I am on psychology.
_November 5th, 1915._
Still much occupied; out almost all day and every day, either on
horseback or in a motor. Much interest has been displayed in
these parts in the visit of the King. I have passed the chateau
where he is staying almost every day this past week.
The district where we are now quartered is filled with refugees,
among them some orphans from Loos. Some people about here have
been terribly hit by the war, but some are reaping enormous
profits out of it. Such is the caprice of fortune. All over this
neighbourhood you see the names of Life Guards, Royal Horse
Guards, Grenadiers, etc., carved on doors and panels. We are
close to a large town which is an important point in the scheme
of things.
Events seem to be taking a remarkable turn. Who, at the start of
the war, would have thought that we would have been able to land
a military force in the Balkan Peninsula? It is really a
remarkable position all round. Asquith's speech was frank if
nothing else. There appears to have been discord in the Cabinet,
so now we are about to have something like a "Committee of Public
Safety." Marvellous race, the English! Lord Derby seems to be an
outstanding personality just now. Have you noticed how each month
of the war is marked by some new phase of public opinion?
Optimism, pessimism, spies, Zeppelins, economy, pink forms,
voluntaryism, conscription, munitions--each of these has been for
a time the centre of public interest, and each has swiftly fallen
from its pedestal to be replaced by some other phase. Curiously
enough, the talk at home has not been influenced in any direct
way by the real progress of the war, but by the effect on the
popular imagination of trivial incidents, magnified out of all
proportion by sensational journals. The war goes on,
nevertheless, showing that the great British spirit is something
far too strong and deep to be really influenced by the caprices
of public opinion.
It is amusing to see how the views of certain newspapers vary
from month to month, and even more diverting to observe how all
the amateur strategists claim that they had really predicted
every phase of the military operations. Believe me, however, the
war has been and is quite different from any ideas entertained in
regard to it in the early weeks and months. It is a blend of
grotesque incongruities that would be humorous were not one side
of them so tragic and terrible. No one here seems to know
anything definite about what is going on. One has considerable
local knowledge but very little general information. Probably the
latter is impossible to get in this sort of mix-up--the scale on
which the war is being waged is so vast.
You will see roughly from Sir John French's latest dispatch the
part played by the cavalry in the advance of 25th September-5th
October. You will not, of course, be able to glean much of what
actually happened, but I can tell you we had a most interesting
time.
How tiresome is the tosh written in the papers and spoken in
Parliament about the war! One wonders if it would not be a good
plan to shut up Parliament for a time, though I suppose it is a
good thing to have a place where men can vent their foolish
thoughts. But I am thoroughly weary of "Statements by the Prime
Minister" which state nothing, and of mere denunciations by Sir
Arthur Markham and Sir Edward Carson; also of the shrieking of
the Yellow Press, the wishy-washiness of the Liberal Press and
the _Spectator_, the impenetrable Conservatism of the _Morning
Post_, and the noisy sensationalism of the Bottomley--Austin
Harrison crew. Thank goodness the strong broad stream of British
spirit runs deeper and is much purer than would appear from this
froth and scum on the surface.
Recently it has been a period of Catholic festivals about here.
Some days there have been processions and bell-ringing from morn
to eve. The other day was the Fete des Morts, and lately there
was the French All Saints' Day. It is a singular sensation to
hear the chime of church bells blending with the thudding of the
guns.
_November 18th, 1915._
Yesterday I rode twenty-five miles. A delightful experience it
was, too;--in crisp winter weather and with the surrounding
country covered with snow. It has become very cold of late, but I
am fond of cold weather, especially when it keeps dry. Assigned
some special work by the Staff Captain, I had permission to move
when and how I liked, instead of accompanying the Column as I
usually do. The result was that I was able to join up with the
Veterinary section attached to the brigade. We moved at our own
pace, resting our horses where we wanted to and giving them a
good drink and feed _en route_, instead of jogging on
monotonously with the Column. Our horses were thoroughly fit and
full of life when we reached our destination, and good for
another twenty-five miles if necessary. You would not believe how
much horses benefit from care and attention as to food and rest.
The time you lose in watering, resting and feeding, you can
always more than make up through the consequent freshness of
your animals. Obviously, when speed is absolutely vital, you
can't choose your time to rest the horses. For example: on those
never-to-be-forgotten days, 23-26 September last, we used to move
at a rapid trot for hours on end--for the expectation then was
that the Boche line might be broken. This latest "trek" had not
the urgency or the wild excitement of that, and we were able to
take our own time.
I had a ripping game of Rugger a few days back, playing for the
19th Hussars against the Bedford Yeomanry. The latter, who
included some old Bedford School boys, beat us, though only by
one point. I played forward in the first half of the game, and
scrum-half in the second. It _was_ a treat to handle a Rugby ball
again!
Things are becoming rather mixed in English politics, what with
Asquith's contradictory statements about conscription, Carson
resigning and Winston flinging up politics for the Army. His
resignation is creditable to Winston, and at a moment like this
he would naturally want to do his bit at the Front. Everybody in
the cavalry that I have spoken to considers him a good sportsman.
Myself, I regard Churchill as a man with a real touch of genius.
The Haldane controversy seems to have started afresh. How
terrible is the ingratitude of the masses! If Haldane had done no
more than create the Territorials and the Officers' Training
Corps he would have had an everlasting claim to fame; but when
one considers also his creation of the General Staff, and his
arrangements for mobilising, equipping, transporting and
supplying the B.E.F.--well, one begins to realise that the man is
a Colossus. And yet the wretched Jingoes continue to bespatter
him with mud, and I suppose the nation in the mass regards him as
a species of highly-educated spy! But perhaps the majority of
the people have never heard of him--Charlie Chaplin is a far more
living personality to most of them, I make no doubt.
I referred in a recent letter (p. 162), to the fluctuating phases
of opinion in England in regard to the war. A new phase would
appear now to have arisen and taken the place of the Lord Derby
boom. This new phase is one of criticism of past military and
naval operations--Neuve Chapelle, Loos, Suvla Bay, the Narrows,
Antwerp, etc. etc., all of which are being discussed with equal
zest and ignorance. Mark my words, there will soon be a new phase
or an old one will recur.
TO HIS BROTHER.
_November 23rd, 1915._
I am so sorry Dulwich got done down by Bedford. Of all our
matches, that is the one we are most keen on winning. Still, we
can't expect to win always, and we have not lost to Bedford for
three years till now. I had perhaps the unique experience of
being in a team which never lost a Bedford match. In 1912-13,
when I got my colours, we drew 28 points all; in 1913-14 we won,
16 to 15; and last year, 32 to 16. Well, I would have given
anything for the School to have got home a fourth time against
old Bedford, but it was not to be.
The sudden drop in temperature during the last fortnight has
affected most people here. I have escaped without any sort of
cold, though nine-tenths of the officers and men have been down
with chills.
My mare has developed a devil of a temper of late, and bites and
kicks like anything--a sign of exuberant vigour. Fortunately she
gets on well with my other horse, and they don't "strafe" each
other in the stable. To get horses in the same stable on good
terms with each other is largely a question of feeding them at
the same time. My second horse, which my servant rides when we
are on the move, is a jolly little chestnut, very strong and
hardy, with a magnificent long tail. I ride him and the mare on
alternate days. Horses are ridiculous creatures. They will eat
all sorts of things, even wood, mud, and pieces of coal, as if
from sheer cussedness. It can't be because they are hungry, as
they get plenty to eat in the way of oats, hay, dry clover, etc.
Sometimes, as if from devilment, they will roll in the mud a few
minutes after they have been nicely groomed. Some of our
regiments have a lot of mules, which are given to fearful
brayings--a sound which is a cross between a horse's whinny, a
donkey's hee-haw and an elephant's trumpeting. Mules bite and
kick each other continually, but they will do any amount of work
when so inclined.
_November 29th, 1915._
I see that the Welshmen are coming out. May they strafe the
Boches to the wide! I hope the Cymry will prove themselves worthy
successors to Owain Glyndwr and all the other grand old chiefs
who have given us such a name in arms. Times have changed, and
to-day, instead of smiting your foe with a club or a sword, you
"strafe" him with gas-shells and machine-guns. The old way was
the best, but the natural instinct of all things animate to fight
remains, as it always will remain.
We have received some of _The Times'_ broad-sheets. I don't
exactly know whether they are good or not. It is undoubtedly a
benefit to have "bits" from great writers to skim over when you
haven't the time, or the inclination, to wade through a volume.
On the other hand, it is intensely aggravating to experience the
feeling of incompleteness that naturally results from having your
reading suddenly cut off.
_December 3rd, 1915._
The other day I was ordered to visit a certain battery in the
firing-line. No one had a ghost of an idea as to their present
location, but I discovered where their supplies were being drawn
from--a spot two miles from the line, which was being "strafed"
daily. Off I went to this place in my car, but nobody there knew
a thing about the people I wanted, so I had to go up to the
railway station and crave the loan of a telephone. After a great
deal of bother I got on to some genial soul who knew where the
Brigade Headquarters were of the lot I was after. He told me
where they had gone to, but whether they were still there or not
he didn't know. Anyhow, it was a clue. So, like Pillingshot (in
P. G.'s story), I worked on it.
After consulting my maps, and chatting with dozens of military
police, interpreters, etc., I took my car forward by a certain
road. By this time it was pitch dark, except for star shells and
gun flashes. The road was crammed with traffic. We took a wrong
turning, and eventually found ourselves on an apology for a road
that ended in a swamp full of shell-holes, and had to retrace our
steps gingerly. After blundering about in the dark for some time
we struck the village we were looking for, a hopeless sort of
place crammed with Scotsmen, all exceedingly grimy, but gay and
cheerful. In one house the men were waltzing to the strains of a
mouth-organ, though the boom of the guns was shaking the house
every second or so.
Having reached the Headquarters I was in quest of, I ascertained
from them that the battery with which I had business to do was
now at a spot two miles away down a main road which was the scene
of such desperate fighting not long back. The O.C. strongly
advised me not to take the car down there, as if I did "it was
likely that the car would stop some pieces of metal." There was
nothing for it but to walk down the road leading to the recently
captured village. It was very dark, but star-shells, with their
weird green light, would illuminate the countryside every five
minutes or so. In the darkness one could vaguely discern the
shape of the first-line transport wagons taking up rations to the
trenches, and small columns of silently marching men, and now and
then a motor lorry belonging to some ammunition park. Presently,
after what seemed an interminable walk, I found the battery, who
themselves had only just arrived, and executed my job in a
half-ruined house. To get back to my car I borrowed a horse and
rode part of the way with a number of led horses, which, having
brought up the guns, were going back to the wagon line.
On getting to my car I decided that my best road to return would
be to go straight along into a certain large town, instead of the
route we'd come by. As we spun along a voice from the darkness
hailed us: "Have you room for an officer?" We at once pulled up
and told him to jump in. Poor devil! he was almost in a state of
collapse and talked wildly. He had been six months in the
trenches, and had just come out of them in a half-hysterical
state. I had to speak to him pretty firmly before he could pull
himself together. We took him to his destination, and he was most
grateful for the lift.
It was an uncanny experience, this wandering about in the
darkness in desolate regions a few hundred yards from the
trenches. In this grim struggle there is none of the glory and
pomp of war as exhibited in the days of old, when rival armies
met amid the blare of trumpets and the waving of standards. The
pageantry of war is gone. We have now war in all its fierceness,
grime and cold-bloodedness without any picturesque glamour or
romance. Can you wonder that in such conditions civilised human
nature out here swiftly changes and is replaced by elemental
savagery?
In December, 1915, Paul Jones had short leave, and spent six days at
home. He took advantage of the opportunity to have a game of football
on the familiar arena in Dulwich, playing for the Old Alleynians
against the College 1st XV.
_December 21st, 1915._
All well after a pleasant crossing. The blundering authorities
kept us and three other leave trains six hours in ---- station,
no one being allowed to leave the platform! We eventually reached
---- at 7 P.M. The two first men I met on the boat were old
Dulwich boys, W. J. Barnard and Bobby Dicke. Barnard is a
field-gunner, and Dicke is in the 1st Royal Fusiliers. I also met
another O.A., named Corsan, who is captain in Barnard's battery.
How well I remember ragging with him in choir practices! We had a
thrilling chat over old times. Both Barnard and Corsan went
through the Battle of Loos. On reaching France we found there was
no means of getting to our respective destinations until next
morning, so we all dined together with a couple of other subs.,
one in the K.R.R.s, a mere boy in appearance but a veteran in
experience. How delightful to meet old pals, and what splendid
fellows these old public-school men are!
Everything is very festive about here just now. Officers and men
are making ready to pass Christmas in the old-fashioned way.
_December 28th, 1915._
We had a very jolly Christmas. The revellings have, in fact, only
just begun to subside. Our Brigade Major spent his Christmas in
the trenches along with his brother, a V.C. In that part of the
line there was a truce for a quarter of an hour on Christmas Day,
and a number of Englishmen and Germans jumped out and started
talking together. A German gave one of our men a Christmas tree
about two feet high as a souvenir. It is of the usual variety,
covered with tinsel and adorned with glass balls.
_January 4th, 1916._