PROGNATHISM

Since better understood, the subject of facial prognathism has lost

much of its allure in anthropology; yet the matter is not wholly

without interest.

Facial protrusion is as a rule secondary to and largely caused by

alveolar protrusion, which in turn is caused by the size and shape of

the dental arch; and the dental arch is generally proportional to the

size of the teeth. The form of the arch is, however, quite influential.

With the teeth identical in size a narrow arch will be more, a broad

arch less protruding, and a narrow arch with small teeth may protrude

more than a broad one with larger teeth. Another influence is that of

the height of the upper face, the same arch protruding more in a low

face than in a high one. And still another factor is the incline of the

front teeth, though this affects merely the appearance of prognathism

and not its measurements.

There are different ways of measuring facial prognathism, and with

sufficient care all may be effective; I prefer, for practical reasons,

linear measurements from the basion, which, together with the facial

and subnasal heights, give triangles that can readily be reconstructed

on paper and allow a direct measurement of both the facial and the

alveolar angle. The three needed diameters from basion are taken, the

first to the "prealveolar point," or the _most anterior_ point on the

upper dental arch above the incisors; the second to the "subnasal

point," or the point on the left (for convenience) of the nasal

aperture, where the outer part of its border passes into that which

belongs to the subnasal portion of the maxilla (the point where the

subnasal slant begins); and the third to nasion. The facial height is

that from the alveolar point (_lowest_ point of the upper alveolar

border in the median line) to nasion; while for the subnasal height,

which can not be measured directly, I utilize the difference between

the facial and nasal heights, which is very close to the needed

dimension.

The important basion-nasion diameter has already been considered. That

to the subnasal point needs no comment. That to the prealveolar point

shows in the western and other Eskimo as follows:

Anthropological Survey in Alaska · 第 388 / 471 题