Snowy owls are noted for occasional invasions that have been

correlated with the periodic maximum of Arctic foxes and the lemming

cycle in the north. According to Gross (1947) 24 major invasions

occurred between 1833 and 1945. The interval between these varied

from 2 to 14 years, but nearly half (11) were at intervals of 4

years. A great flight occurred in the winter of 1926-27 when more

than 1,000 records were received from New England alone, but the

largest on record was in 1945-46 when the "Snowy Owl Committee"

of the American Ornithologists' Union received reports of 13,502

birds, of which 4,443 were reported as killed. It extended over the

entire width of the continent from Washington and British Columbia

to the Atlantic coast and south to Nebraska, Illinois, Indiana,

Pennsylvania, and Maryland. One was taken as far south as South

Carolina.

In the Rocky Mountain region great flights of the beautiful Bohemian

waxwing are occasionally recorded. The greatest invasion in the

history of Colorado ornithology occurred in February 1917, at which

time the writer estimated that at least 10,000 were within the

corporate limits of the city of Denver. The last previous occurrence

of the species in large numbers in that section was in 1908.

Evening grosbeaks likewise are given to performing more or less

wandering journeys, and curiously enough, in addition to occasional

trips south of their regular range, they travel east and west,

sometimes covering long distances. For example, grosbeaks banded at

Sault Ste. Marie, Mich., have been recaptured on Cape Cod, Mass., and

in the following season have been retrapped at the banding station.

Banding records demonstrate that this east-and-west trip across the

northeastern part of the country is sometimes made also by purple

finches.

_Perils of Migration_

The period of migration is a season full of peril for birds. Untold

thousands of the smaller migrants are destroyed each year by storms

and through attacks of predatory birds, mammals, and reptiles. If

each pair of adult birds should succeed in raising two fledglings to

maturity, the population of migratory birds would have a potential

annual increase of 100 percent and the world would soon be heavily

overpopulated with them. Since there is no such increase it is

evident that the annual mortality from natural causes is heavy enough

to keep it in check.

=Storms=

Of the various factors limiting the abundance of birds, particularly

the smaller species, storms are the most potent. Special sufferers

are those birds that in crossing broad stretches of water are forced

down by a storm within reach of the waves. Such a catastrophe was

once seen from the deck of a vessel in the Gulf of Mexico, 30 miles

off the mouth of the Mississippi River. Great numbers of migrating

birds, chiefly warblers, had accomplished nearly 95 percent of

their long flight and were nearing land, when, caught by a norther

against which they were unable to contend, hundreds were forced into

the waters of the Gulf and drowned. On another occasion, on Lake

Michigan, a severe storm came up at a time when large numbers of

migratory birds were crossing and forced numerous victims into the

waves. During the fall migration of 1906, when thousands of birds

were crossing Lake Huron, a sudden drop in temperature accompanied

by a heavy snowfall resulted in the death of incredible numbers.

Literally thousands were forced into the water and subsequently cast

up along the beaches, where in places their bodies were piled in

windrows. On one section of the beach the dead birds were estimated

at 1,000 per mile, and at another point at 5 times that number. Most

of them were species that rank among our most desirable birds as

destroyers of insects and weed seeds, including slate-colored juncos,

tree sparrows, white-throated sparrows, swamp sparrows, winter wrens,

and golden-crowned kinglets, together with many brown creepers,

hermit thrushes, warblers, vireos, and others.

Of all species of North American birds, the Lapland longspur seems to

be the most frequent victim of mass destruction from storms. These

birds sometimes congregate in enormous numbers where grass or weed

seed is abundant. Almost every winter brings in reports of their

death by thousands somewhere in the Middle West. While migrating

northward at night they have encountered blinding storms of wet,

clinging snow, which have so bewildered them that they have flown

into various obstructions, or have sunk to the ground and perished

of exposure and exhaustion. In 1907 an experienced ornithologist

estimated that 750,000 longspurs were lying dead on the ice of 2

lakes in Minnesota, each about 1 square mile in extent, and dead

birds were reported in greater or less abundance on this occasion

over an area of more than 1,500 square miles. The heaviest mortality

occurred in towns, where, bewildered by the darkness and the heavy

falling snow, some of the birds congregating in great numbers flew

against various obstacles and were killed or stunned, while many

others fell to the ground exhausted. Similar catastrophes have been

reported from eastern Colorado, Nebraska, and North Dakota.

During the early part of June 1927, a hailstorm of exceptional

severity in and around Denver, Colo., killed large numbers of robins,

meadow larks, sparrows, and others. The lawns of parks were strewn

with the bodies of these birds, and many lay dead in their nests

where they were covering their eggs or young when the storm broke.

=Aerial obstructions=

Lighthouses, lightships, tall bridges, piers, monuments, and

other aerial obstructions have been responsible for a tremendous

destruction of migratory birds. Beams of the lanterns at light

stations have a powerful attraction for nocturnal travelers of the

air that may be likened to the fascination for lights that also

is shown by many insects, particularly night-flying moths. The

attraction is not so potent in clear weather, but when the atmosphere

is moisture laden, as in a heavy fog, the rays have a dazzling effect

that lures the birds to their death. They may fly straight up the

beam and dash themselves headlong against the glass, or they may keep

fluttering around the source of the light until exhausted, and then

drop to the rocks or waves below. The fixed, white, stationary light

located 180 feet above sea level at Ponce de Leon Inlet (formerly

Mosquito Inlet), Fla., has caused great destruction of bird life

even though the lens is shielded by wire netting. On one occasion an

observer gathered up a bushel-basketful of warblers, sparrows, and

other small passerine birds that had struck during the night. The

birds apparently beat themselves to death against the wire or fell

exhausted to the concrete pavement below, frequently to be destroyed

there by cats or skunks. Two other lighthouses at the southern end

of Florida, Sombrero Key and Fowey Rocks, have been the cause of

a great number of bird tragedies, while heavy mortality has been

noted also at some of the lights on the Great Lakes and on the coast

of Quebec. It is the fixed white lights that cause such disasters

to birds, as the stations equipped with flashing or red lights do

not present such strong attractions. That it is not a mere case of

geographical location has been demonstrated, for it is observed that

when fixed white lights have been changed to red or flashing lights,

the migrating birds are no longer endangered. At some of the light

stations in England and elsewhere, shelves and perches have been

placed below the lanterns to afford places where birds can rest until

they have overcome their bewilderment.

For many years at the National Capital, the Washington Monument,

although unilluminated, caused the destruction of large numbers of

small birds, due apparently to their inability to see this obstacle

in their path, towering more than 555 feet into the air. One morning

in the spring of 1902 the bodies of nearly 150 warblers, sparrows,

and other birds were found about its base. Then, as the illumination

of the city was improved and the Monument became more visible at

night, the loss became steadily less, until by 1920 only a few birds

would be killed during an entire migration. On November 11, 1931,

however, as part of the Armistice Day celebration, batteries of

brilliant floodlights grouped on all four sides about the base of the

Monument were added to the two searchlights already trained on the

apex, so that the lighted shaft probably corresponds in brilliancy

to a very low magnitude lighthouse lantern. Airplane pilots have

ventured opinions that on a clear night it could be seen for 40

miles. It is certain that there is an extensive area of illumination,

and on dark nights, when there are gusty, northerly winds and the

nocturnal travelers seem to fly at lower altitudes, many of them are

attracted to the Monument as to a lighthouse beacon. As they approach

from the north a last-minute attempt to avoid it causes them to

veer off to the east or the west where they are literally sucked in

and dashed against the southern face of the shaft. During the fall

migration of 1932 more than 500 warblers, vireos, thrushes, kinglets,

sparrows, and others were killed. Since that year the mortality has

been less, but the Monument at times remains a serious menace to

birds during migration and some are killed nearly every fall.

When the torch on the Statue of Liberty in New York Harbor was kept

lighted, it caused an enormous destruction of bird life, tabulations

showing as many as 700 birds killed in a single month.

In September 1948, bird students were startled by news of the

wholesale destruction of Maryland yellowthroats, redstarts,

ovenbirds, and others that were dashed against the 1,250-foot

high Empire State Building in New York City, the 491-foot high

Philadelphia Saving Fund Society Building in Philadelphia, and the

450-foot high WBAL radio tower in Baltimore. In New York the birds

continued to crash into the Empire State Building over a 6-hour

period and their bodies were scattered over a four-block area. The

mortality was so heavy in Philadelphia that it was impossible to

use the sidewalk below the sky-scraper until the birds had been

gathered. A study of the weather conditions prevailing at this

time in the Atlantic coastal region suggests the probable cause

of this catastrophe. By early morning on September 11 a mass of

cold, southward-flowing air had just reached New York City where

it was forcing upward and was being overridden by a mass of warm,

northward-flowing air. Presumably the migrants were riding the upper

levels of the southbound current which, in the contact zone with the

northbound current, was being deflected earthward, thus causing the

birds to fly lower and lower until they were below the tower of the

Empire State Building. Clouds and gusty winds in the zone of contact

between the two air masses reduced visibility and disrupted avian

navigation with the result that the confused travelers crashed into

the stone and steel obstruction. As the cold air mass continued to

move southward, the situation was repeated at Philadelphia and at

Baltimore.

=Exhaustion=

Although it would seem that the exertion incident to the long

flights of many species of migratory birds would result in their

arrival at their destination in a state bordering on exhaustion,

this is contrary to the truth. Both the soaring and the sailing of

birds show them to be proficient in the use of factors employed in

aerial transportation that only recently have become understood and

imitated by aeronautical engineers. The use of ascending currents

of air, employed by all soaring birds, and easily demonstrated by

observing the gulls that glide hour after hour along the windward

side of a ship, are now utilized by man in his operation of gliders.

Moreover, the whole structure of a bird renders it the most perfect

machine for extensive flight that the world has ever known. Hollow,

air-filled bones, making an ideal combination of strength and

lightness, and the lightest and toughest material possible for

flight in the form of feathers, combine to produce a perfect flying

machine. Mere consideration of a bird's economy of fuel or energy

also is enlightening. The golden plover, traveling over the oceanic

route, makes the entire distance of 2,400 miles from Nova Scotia to

South America without stop, probably requiring about 48 hours of

continuous flight. This is accomplished with the consumption of less

than 2 ounces of fuel in the form of body fat. To be as economical in

operation, a 1,000-pound airplane would consume in a 20-mile flight

not the gallon of fuel usually required, but only a single pint.

The sora, or Carolina rail, which is such a notoriously weak flyer

that at least one writer was led to infer that most of its migration

was made on foot, has one of the longest migration routes of any

member of the family, and easily crosses the wide reaches of the

Caribbean Sea. The tiny ruby-throated hummingbird crosses the Gulf of

Mexico in a single flight of more than 500 miles.

While birds that have recently arrived from a protracted flight

over land or sea sometimes show evidences of being tired--as, for

example, pintail ducks that have flown from the North American

mainland to the Hawaiian Islands--their condition is far from being

a state of exhaustion. With a few hours' rest and a crop well

filled with proper food, most birds exhibit eagerness to resume

their journey. The popular notion that birds find the long ocean

flights excessively wearisome and that they sink exhausted when

terra firma is reached, generally does not agree with the facts.

The truth lies in the opposite direction, as even small land birds

are so little averse to ocean voyages that they not only cross the

Gulf of Mexico at its widest point, but may even pass without pause

over the low, swampy coastal plain to the higher regions beyond.

Under favorable conditions birds can fly when, where, and how they

please. Consequently the distance covered in a single flight is

governed chiefly by the food supply. Exhaustion, except as the result

of unusual factors, cannot be said to be an important peril of

migration.

_Influence of the Weather on Migration_

The state of the weather at any point has little if anything to do

with the time of arrival of migratory birds. This is contrary to the

belief of observers who have thought that they could foretell the

appearance of various species by a study of the weather conditions.

Though the insistent crescendo note of the ovenbird is ordinarily

associated with the full verdure of May woods, this bird has been

known to reach its breeding grounds in a snowstorm and the records

of its arrival in southern Minnesota show a temperature variation

from near freezing to full summer warmth. Temperatures at arrival of

several other common birds vary from 14 degrees between highest and

lowest temperatures to 37 degrees, the average variation being about

24 degrees.

It should be remembered that North American species spending the

winter months in tropical latitudes experience no marked changes in

climatic conditions from November to March or April, yet frequently

they will start the northward movement in January or February. This

is in obedience to physiological promptings and has no relation to

the prevailing weather conditions. For migratory birds the winter

season is a period of rest, a time when they have no cares other

than those associated with the daily search for food or escape from

their natural enemies. Their migrations, however, are a vital part

of their life cycles, which have become so well adjusted that the

seasons of travel correspond in general with the major seasonal

changes on their breeding grounds. With the approach of spring,

therefore, the reproductive impulse awakens, and each individual bird

is irresistibly impelled to start the journey that ends in its summer

home.

In other words, the evidence indicates that the urge to migrate

is so ingrained that each species moves north in spring when the

average weather that will be encountered is not unendurable. The

word "average" must be emphasized since it appears obvious that the

migrations of birds have so evolved that in general they synchronize

with average climatic conditions. The hardy species travel early,

fearless of the blasts of retreating winter, while the more delicate

kinds come later when there is less danger of encountering prolonged

periods of inclement weather. Some of the hardy birds pause in

favorable areas and allow the spring season to advance. Then, by

rapid travel they again overtake it, or, as sometimes happens, they

actually outstrip it. Occasionally this results in some hardship,

and rarely in the destruction of large numbers of individuals. Cases

are known where early migrating bluebirds have been overwhelmed by

late winter storms. Nevertheless, unless such climatic conditions are

prolonged, no serious effect on the species is noted. The soundness

of the bird's instincts is evidenced by the fact that natural

catastrophes, great though they may be, do not permanently diminish

the avian populations.

As has been pointed out, the advance of average temperature lines,

known as isotherms, is found to correspond closely with the northward

movements of certain species. For example, the northward travels

of the Canada goose are found to coincide with the advance of the

isotherm of 35° F. (fig. 4).

The spring flight of migrants, if interrupted for any reason, is

resumed when weather conditions again become favorable, and it is

probable that all instances of arrival of birds in stormy weather

can be explained on the theory that the flight was begun while the

weather was auspicious. The state of the weather when a flight starts

at any southern point, the relation of that place to the average

position of the bird under normal weather conditions on that date,

and the average rate of migratory flight, are data basic to any

reasonably accurate prediction of the time arrival may be expected in

northern areas.

Head winds are as unfavorable to migration as is rain or snow, as

they greatly increase the labor of flight and cut down the speed of

cross-country travel. If such winds have a particularly high velocity

they may force down the weaker travelers, and when this happens over

water areas, large numbers of birds are lost. Even strong winds that

blow in the direction of aerial travel are unfavorable for the birds,

as they interfere with their balance and disarrange their feathers.

Moderate tail winds and cross or quartering breezes appear to offer

the best conditions for the passage of the migrants.

_Problems of Migration_

=Banding studies=

The study of living birds by the banding method, whereby great

numbers of individuals are marked with numbered aluminum leg rings,

has come to be recognized as a most accurate means of ornithological

research. Since 1920, banding work in North America has been under

the direction of the Fish and Wildlife Service in cooperation

with the Dominion Wildlife Service of Canada. Every year voluntary

cooperators, working under permit, place bands on thousands of birds,

game and nongame, large and small, migratory and nonmigratory,

each band carrying a serial number and the legend, NOTIFY FISH AND

WILDLIFE SERVICE, WASHINGTON, D. C., or on the smaller sizes an

abbreviation thereof. When a banded bird is reported from a second

locality, a definite fact relative to its movements becomes known,

and a study of many cases of this nature develops more and more

complete knowledge of the details of migration.

The records of banded birds are also yielding other pertinent

information relative to their migrations, such as the exact dates

of arrival and departure of individuals, the length of time that

different birds pause on their migratory journeys to feed and rest,

the relation between weather conditions and the starting times for

migration, the rates of travel of individual birds, the degree of

regularity with which birds return to the exact summer or winter

quarters used in former years, and many other details that could

be learned in no other manner. Banding stations that are operated

systematically throughout the year, therefore, are supplying much

information concerning the movements of migratory birds that

heretofore could only be surmised. (See Appendix II, p. 92 for

instructions on reporting the recovery of banded birds.)

=Movements of residents=

Typical migration consists of definite movements that are repeated

regularly year after year, and it is to these that the term is

generally restricted. It is desirable, however, if only for purposes

of comparison, that some account be taken of the movements of some

other birds, which, while not typical, do possess some of the

characteristics of true migration. Data on this subject are being

collected through bird banding.

There are several species that are customarily grouped under the

heading "permanent residents," the term implying that these birds

do not travel but remain throughout the year in one locality.

Among these are the cardinal, the tufted titmouse, the wrentit,

the Carolina wren, the house finch, the bobwhite, the California

quail, and the ruffed grouse. Each species may be present constantly

throughout the year, although in the northern part of the range there

is probably a slight withdrawal of the breeding birds in winter. The

individuals to be seen at that season, therefore, may not always be

the same as those observed during the summer. It is certain, however,

that these species do not regularly perform extensive journeys.

While the blue jay is disposed to be secretive, it is such a showy

and noisy bird that it is not likely to escape notice. In the

vicinity of Washington, D. C., as in many other places, it is present

the year round, but at the end of September or early in October

when the weather is becoming cooler, troops of jays are sometimes

seen working southward through the trees. A corresponding northward

movement occurs again in May. This is unquestionably a migration to

and from some winter range, but its extent or significance is not now

known. Some light is being shed on the matter, however, through the

records of banded birds, and these eventually will fill in a more

perfect picture of the movements of this species. One jay, banded on

September 14, 1923, at Waukegan, Ill., was killed at Peruque, Mo.,

on November 15 of the same year; another, banded at Winnetka, Ill.,

on June 16, 1925, was retaken at Sulphur Rock, Ark., the following

December 10; a third, banded on May 6, 1925, at Whitten, Iowa, was

recaptured at Decatur, Ark., on January 22, 1926. These three birds

unquestionably had made a flight that had every appearance of being a

true migration to winter quarters in Missouri and Arkansas.

The black-capped chickadee is apparently resident in many places, but

occasionally in winter it invades the range of the southern Carolina

chickadee, and in northern Canada it is regularly a migrant.

In the coastal plain between Washington, D. C., and the Atlantic

Ocean, the white-breasted nuthatch is usually absent during the

summer, nesting at that season in the higher, or piedmont, country.

Late in fall, however, it appears in fair abundance in the wooded

bottoms, remaining at the lower levels until the following March or

April.

Some birds, including the screech owl, bobwhite, Carolina wren,

and mockingbird, seem to be actually sedentary, but even these are

sometimes given to post-breeding wanderings. Ordinarily bobwhites

that are marked with numbered bands are seldom retaken far from the

area where banded, but sometimes they will travel 10 miles or more.

A screech owl banded at Glenwood, Minn., in March, was recovered

the following December at Emmetsburg, Iowa, 180 miles south. Such

flights, however, are probably more in the nature of a search for

new feeding areas, or to escape from a winged enemy, than a true

migratory journey.

=Migration of the white-throated sparrow=

Migration of Birds (1950) · 第 6 / 8 段