TWELFTH WEEK

Mr. Horace Greeley, the introduction of whose name confers an honor

upon this page (although I ought to say that it is used entirely

without his consent), is my sole authority in agriculture. In

politics I do not dare to follow him; but in agriculture he is

irresistible. When, therefore, I find him advising Western farmers

not to hill up their corn, I think that his advice must be political.

You must hill up your corn. People always have hilled up their corn.

It would take a constitutional amendment to change the practice, that

has pertained ever since maize was raised. "It will stand the

drought better," says Mr. Greeley, "if the ground is left level." I

have corn in my garden, ten and twelve feet high, strong and lusty,

standing the drought like a grenadier; and it is hilled. In advising

this radical change, Mr. Greeley evidently has a political purpose.

He might just as well say that you should not hill beans, when

everybody knows that a "hill of beans" is one of the most expressive

symbols of disparagement. When I become too lazy to hill my corn, I,

too, shall go into politics.

I am satisfied that it is useless to try to cultivate "pusley." I set

a little of it one side, and gave it some extra care. It did not

thrive as well as that which I was fighting. The fact is, there is a

spirit of moral perversity in the plant, which makes it grow the

more, the more it is interfered with. I am satisfied of that. I

doubt if any one has raised more "pusley" this year than I have; and

my warfare with it has been continual. Neither of us has slept much.

If you combat it, it will grow, to use an expression that will be

understood by many, like the devil. I have a neighbor, a good

Christian man, benevolent, and a person of good judgment. He planted

next to me an acre of turnips recently. A few days after, he went to

look at his crop; and he found the entire ground covered with a thick

and luxurious carpet of "pusley," with a turnip-top worked in here

and there as an ornament. I have seldom seen so thrifty a field. I

advised my neighbor next time to sow "pusley" and then he might get a

few turnips. I wish there was more demand in our city markets for

"pusley" as a salad. I can recommend it.

It does not take a great man to soon discover that, in raising

anything, the greater part of the plants goes into stalk and leaf,

and the fruit is a most inconsiderable portion. I plant and hoe a

hill of corn: it grows green and stout, and waves its broad leaves

high in the air, and is months in perfecting itself, and then yields

us not enough for a dinner. It grows because it delights to do so,

--to take the juices out of my ground, to absorb my fertilizers, to

wax luxuriant, and disport itself in the summer air, and with very

little thought of making any return to me. I might go all through my

garden and fruit trees with a similar result. I have heard of places

where there was very little land to the acre. It is universally true

that there is a great deal of vegetable show and fuss for the result

produced. I do not complain of this. One cannot expect vegetables

to be better than men: and they make a great deal of ostentatious

splurge; and many of them come to no result at last. Usually, the

more show of leaf and wood, the less fruit. This melancholy

reflection is thrown in here in order to make dog-days seem cheerful

in comparison.

One of the minor pleasures of life is that of controlling vegetable

activity and aggressions with the pruning-knife. Vigorous and rapid

growth is, however, a necessity to the sport. To prune feeble plants

and shrubs is like acting the part of dry-nurse to a sickly orphan.

You must feel the blood of Nature bound under your hand, and get the

thrill of its life in your nerves. To control and culture a strong,

thrifty plant in this way is like steering a ship under full headway,

or driving a locomotive with your hand on the lever, or pulling the

reins over a fast horse when his blood and tail are up. I do not

understand, by the way, the pleasure of the jockey in setting up the

tail of the horse artificially. If I had a horse with a tail not

able to sit up, I should feed the horse, and curry him into good

spirits, and let him set up his own tail. When I see a poor,

spiritless horse going by with an artificially set-up tail, it is

only a signal of distress. I desire to be surrounded only by

healthy, vigorous plants and trees, which require constant cutting-in

and management. Merely to cut away dead branches is like perpetual

attendance at a funeral, and puts one in low spirits. I want to have

a garden and orchard rise up and meet me every morning, with the

request to "lay on, Macduff." I respect old age; but an old currant-

bush, hoary with mossy bark, is a melancholy spectacle.

I suppose the time has come when I am expected to say something about

fertilizers: all agriculturists do. When you plant, you think you

cannot fertilize too much: when you get the bills for the manure, you

think you cannot fertilize too little. Of course you do not expect

to get the value of the manure back in fruits and vegetables; but

something is due to science,--to chemistry in particular. You must

have a knowledge of soils, must have your soil analyzed, and then go

into a course of experiments to find what it needs. It needs

analyzing,--that, I am clear about: everything needs that. You had

better have the soil analyzed before you buy: if there is "pusley "

in it, let it alone. See if it is a soil that requires much hoeing,

and how fine it will get if there is no rain for two months. But

when you come to fertilizing, if I understand the agricultural

authorities, you open a pit that will ultimately swallow you up,-

-farm and all. It is the great subject of modern times, how to

fertilize without ruinous expense; how, in short, not to starve the

earth to death while we get our living out of it. Practically, the

business is hardly to the taste of a person of a poetic turn of mind.

The details of fertilizing are not agreeable. Michael Angelo, who

tried every art, and nearly every trade, never gave his mind to

fertilizing. It is much pleasanter and easier to fertilize with a

pen, as the agricultural writers do, than with a fork. And this

leads me to say, that, in carrying on a garden yourself, you must

have a "consulting" gardener; that is, a man to do the heavy and

unpleasant work. To such a man, I say, in language used by

Demosthenes to the Athenians, and which is my advice to all

gardeners, "Fertilize, fertilize, fertilize!"

The Complete Writings of Charles Dudley Warner — Volume 1 · 第 21 / 77 题