FIFTH WEEK

I left my garden for a week, just at the close of the dry spell. A

season of rain immediately set in, and when I returned the

transformation was wonderful. In one week every vegetable had fairly

jumped forward. The tomatoes which I left slender plants, eaten of

bugs and debating whether they would go backward or forward, had

become stout and lusty, with thick stems and dark leaves, and some of

them had blossomed. The corn waved like that which grows so rank out

of the French-English mixture at Waterloo. The squashes--I will not

speak of the squashes. The most remarkable growth was the asparagus.

There was not a spear above ground when I went away; and now it had

sprung up, and gone to seed, and there were stalks higher than my

head. I am entirely aware of the value of words, and of moral

obligations. When I say that the asparagus had grown six feet in

seven days, I expect and wish to be believed. I am a little

particular about the statement; for, if there is any prize offered

for asparagus at the next agricultural fair, I wish to compete,-

-speed to govern. What I claim is the fastest asparagus. As for

eating purposes, I have seen better. A neighbor of mine, who looked

in at the growth of the bed, said, " Well, he'd be--": but I told him

there was no use of affirming now; he might keep his oath till I

wanted it on the asparagus affidavit. In order to have this sort of

asparagus, you want to manure heavily in the early spring, fork it

in, and top-dress (that sounds technical) with a thick layer of

chloride of sodium: if you cannot get that, common salt will do, and

the neighbors will never notice whether it is the orthodox Na. Cl.

58-5, or not.

I scarcely dare trust myself to speak of the weeds. They grow as if

the devil was in them. I know a lady, a member of the church, and a

very good sort of woman, considering the subject condition of that

class, who says that the weeds work on her to that extent, that, in

going through her garden, she has the greatest difficulty in keeping

the ten commandments in anything like an unfractured condition. I

asked her which one, but she said, all of them: one felt like

breaking the whole lot. The sort of weed which I most hate (if I can

be said to hate anything which grows in my own garden) is the

"pusley," a fat, ground-clinging, spreading, greasy thing, and the

most propagatious (it is not my fault if the word is not in the

dictionary) plant I know. I saw a Chinaman, who came over with a

returned missionary, and pretended to be converted, boil a lot of it

in a pot, stir in eggs, and mix and eat it with relish, -"Me likee

he." It will be a good thing to keep the Chinamen on when they come

to do our gardening. I only fear they will cultivate it at the

expense of the strawberries and melons. Who can say that other

weeds, which we despise, may not be the favorite food of some remote

people or tribe? We ought to abate our conceit. It is possible that

we destroy in our gardens that which is really of most value in some

other place. Perhaps, in like manner, our faults and vices are

virtues in some remote planet. I cannot see, however, that this

thought is of the slightest value to us here, any more than weeds

are.

There is another subject which is forced upon my notice. I like

neighbors, and I like chickens; but I do not think they ought to be

united near a garden. Neighbors' hens in your garden are an

annoyance. Even if they did not scratch up the corn, and peck the

strawberries, and eat the tomatoes, it is not pleasant to see them

straddling about in their jerky, high-stepping, speculative manner,

picking inquisitively here and there. It is of no use to tell the

neighbor that his hens eat your tomatoes: it makes no impression on

him, for the tomatoes are not his. The best way is to casually

remark to him that he has a fine lot of chickens, pretty well grown,

and that you like spring chickens broiled. He will take them away at

once.

The neighbors' small children are also out of place in your garden,

in strawberry and currant time. I hope I appreciate the value of

children. We should soon come to nothing without them, though the

Shakers have the best gardens in the world. Without them the common

school would languish. But the problem is, what to do with them in a

garden. For they are not good to eat, and there is a law against

making away with them. The law is not very well enforced, it is

true; for people do thin them out with constant dosing, paregoric,

and soothing-syrups, and scanty clothing. But I, for one, feel that

it would not be right, aside from the law, to take the life, even of

the smallest child, for the sake of a little fruit, more or less, in

the garden. I may be wrong; but these are my sentiments, and I am

not ashamed of them. When we come, as Bryant says in his "Iliad," to

leave the circus of this life, and join that innumerable caravan

which moves, it will be some satisfaction to us, that we have never,

in the way of gardening, disposed of even the humblest child

unnecessarily. My plan would be to put them into Sunday-schools more

thoroughly, and to give the Sunday-schools an agricultural turn;

teaching the children the sacredness of neighbors' vegetables. I

think that our Sunday-schools do not sufficiently impress upon

children the danger, from snakes and otherwise, of going into the

neighbors' gardens.

The Complete Writings of Charles Dudley Warner — Volume 1 · 第 14 / 77 题