I have already described the condition of low and abandoned women in

Spitalfields, Whitechapel, Wapping, and Shadwell, although I have not

touched very closely upon those who cohabit with thieves and other

desperate characters, whose daily means of obtaining a livelihood

exposes them to the penalties the law inflicts upon those who infringe

its provisions. Their mode of living, the houses they inhabit, and the

way in which they pass their time, does not very materially differ from

that of other prostitutes, with this exception, they are not obliged to

frequent casinos, dancing-rooms, and other places of popular resort,

to make acquaintances that may be of service to them in a pecuniary

way, although they do make use of such places for the purposes of

robbery and fraud. Some women of tolerably good repute--that is, who

are regarded as knowing a good set of men, who have admission to the

night-houses in Panton Street and the Haymarket--I am informed, are

connected with thieves. The night-houses and supper-rooms in the

neighbourhood of the Haymarket are for the most part in the hands of a

family of Jews. Kate Hamilton’s in Princes Street, Leicester Square,

belongs to one of this family. She is given a per centage on all the

wine that she sells during the course of the evening, and as she

charges twelve shillings a bottle for Moselle and sparkling wines, it

may readily be supposed that her profits are by no means despicable.

Lizzie Davis’s, Sams’s, Sally’s, and, I believe, the Carlton, also

belong to this family. One of these Jews, I am told, was some few

years back imprisoned for two years on a charge of manslaughter. He

was proprietor of a brothel in the vicinity of Drury Lane, and the

manslaughter occurred through his instrumentality on the premises.

I have been informed by the police that some of the proprietors of

these night-houses are well-known receivers of stolen goods, and

the assertion is easily credible. To exemplify this I will relate a

story told me by a sergeant of the H division. Some two years ago a

robbery was committed by a “snoozer,” or one of those thieves who

take up their quarters at hotels for the purpose of robbery. The

robbery was committed at an hotel in Chester. The thief was captured,

and the Recorder sentenced him to be imprisoned. This man was a

notorious thief, and went under the _soubriquet_ of American Jack.

He was said to have once been in a very different position. He was

polished in his manners, and highly accomplished. He could speak

three or four languages with facility, and was a most formidable and

dexterous thief, causing much apprehension and trouble to the police.

After being incarcerated for a few weeks he contrived in a clever

manner to make his escape from one of the London prisons; it was

supposed by the connivance of his gaolers, who were alleged to have

been bribed by his friends without. Be this as it may, he effected

his liberation, and was successfully concealed in London until the

hue and cry was over, and then shipped off to Paris. But the night

after he escaped he perpetrated the most audacious robbery. He was

dressed by his friends, and having changed his prison attire went to

B---- Hotel, a well-known place, not far from the Freemasons Tavern,

where, singularly enough, the Recorder of Chester, who had sentenced

him, chanced to be staying. American Jack had the presumption to

enter into conversation with the Recorder, who fancied he had seen

his face before, but could not recollect where. The visitors had not

long retired to bed before American Jack commenced operations. He was

furnished by his accomplice with a highly-finished instrument for

housebreaking, which, when inserted in the lock, would pass through and

grasp the key on the inside. This done, it was easy to turn the key

and open the door. The thief actually broke into sixteen or seventeen

rooms that night, and made his exit before daybreak loaded with booty

of every description. The proprietors of the hotel would offer no

reward, as they feared publicity. The Recorder of Chester, when the

robbery was discovered, remembered that the person he had conversed

with the night before was the man he had convicted and sentenced at

the assizes. He repaired to Bow Street with his information, and the

police were put on the scent; but it is well known if no reward is

offered for the apprehension of an eminent criminal the police are not

so active as they are when they have a monetary inducement to incite

them to action. It was imagined that American Jack had taken refuge

with his friends near the Haymarket. A waiter who had been discharged

from one of the night-houses was known slightly to a sergeant of

police, who interrogated him on the subject. This waiter confessed

that he could point out the whereabouts of the thief, and would do so

for twenty pounds, which reward no one concerned in the matter would

offer; and, as I have already stated, the criminal soon after made

his escape to Paris, where he continued to carry on his depredations

with considerable skill, until one day he mixed himself up in a great

jewel robbery, and was apprehended by the _gensdarmes_, and sent to the

galleys for some time, where he is now languishing.

This little history is suggestive--why should not Parliament vote every

year a small sum of money to form a “Detective and Inquiry Fund,” from

which the Commissioners of Police at Whitehall and Old Jewry might

offer rewards for the capture of offenders? Some spur and inducement

surely might be given to our detectives, who take a great deal of

trouble, and, if unsuccessful, are almost always out of pocket through

their researches.

Cannot Sir Richard Mayne and Mr. Daniel Whittle Harvey improve on this

idea?

The police enter the night-houses every evening to see if spirits are

sold on the premises; but as there are bullies at all the doors, and

a code of signals admirably concerted to convey intelligence of the

approach of the officers to those within, everything is carefully

concealed, and the police are at fault. They might if they chose detect

the practices they very well know are commonly carried on; but they

either are not empowered to go to extremities, or else they do not find

it their interest so to do. I have heard, I know not with what truth,

that large sums of money are paid to the police to insure their silence

and compliance; but until this is established it must be received

with hesitation, though circumstances do occur that seem strongly to

corroborate such suspicions. The women who cohabit with thieves are

not necessarily thieves themselves, although such is often the case.

Most pickpockets make their women accomplices in their misdeeds,

because they find their assistance so valuable to them, and indeed

for some species of theft almost indispensable. There are numbers

of young thieves on the other side of the water, and almost all of

them cohabit with some girl or other. The depravity of our juvenile

thieves is a singular feature in their character. It is not exactly

a custom that they follow, but rather an inherent depravity on their

part. They prefer an idle luxurious life, though one also of ignominy

and systematic dishonour, to one of honesty and labour; and this is

the cause of their malpractices, perhaps inculcated at first by the

force of evil example and bad bringing up, and invigorated every day by

independence brought about by the liberty allowed them, the consequence

of parental neglect.

It is of course difficult to give the stories of any of these women,

as they would only criminate themselves disagreeably by confessing

their delinquencies; and it is not easy to pitch upon a thieves’ woman

without she is pointed out by the police, and even then she would deny

the imputation indignantly.

_Park Women, or those who frequent the Parks at night and other retired

places._

Park women, properly so called, are those degraded creatures, utterly

lost to all sense of shame, who wander about the paths most frequented

after nightfall in the Parks, and consent to any species of humiliation

for the sake of acquiring a few shillings. You may meet them in Hyde

Park, between the hours of five and ten (till the gates are closed)

in winter. In the Green Park, in what is called the Mall, which is a

nocturnal thoroughfare, you may see these low wretches walking about

sometimes with men, more generally alone, often early in the morning.

They are to be seen reclining on the benches placed under the trees,

originally intended, no doubt, for a different purpose, occasionally

with the head of a drunken man reposing in their lap. These women are

well known to give themselves up to disgusting practices, that are

alone gratifying to men of morbid and diseased imaginations. They

are old, unsound, and by their appearance utterly incapacitated from

practising their profession where the gas-lamps would expose the

defects in their personal appearance, and the shabbiness of their

ancient and dilapidated attire. I was told that an old woman, whose

front teeth were absolutely wanting, was known to obtain a precarious

livelihood by haunting the by-walks of Hyde Park, near Park Lane. The

unfortunate women that form this despicable class have in some cases

been well off, and have been reduced to their present condition by

a variety of circumstances, among which are intemperance, and the

vicissitudes natural to their vocation. I questioned one who was in the

humour to be communicative, and she gave the subjoined replies to my

questions:--

“I have not always been what I now am. Twenty years ago I was in a

very different position. Then, although, it may seem ludicrous to

you, who see me as I now am, I was comparatively well off. If I were

to tell you my history it would be so romantic you would not believe

it. If I employ a little time in telling you, will you reward me for

my trouble, as I shall be losing my time in talking to you? I am not

actuated by mercenary motives exactly in making this request, but my

time is my money, and I cannot afford to lose either one or the other.

Well, then, I am the daughter of a curate in Gloucestershire. I was

never at school, but my mother educated me at home. I had one brother

who entered the Church. When I was old enough I saw that the limited

resources of my parents would not allow them to maintain me at home

without seriously impairing their resources, and I proposed that I

should go out as a governess. At first they would not hear of it; but I

persisted in my determination, and eventually obtained a situation in

a family in town. Then I was very pretty. I may say so without vanity

or ostentation, for I had many admirers, among whom I numbered the only

son of the people in whose house I lived. I was engaged to teach his

two sisters, and altogether I gave great satisfaction to the family.

The girls were amiable and tractable, and I soon acquired an influence

over their generous dispositions that afforded great facilities for

getting them on in their studies. My life might have been very happy

if an unfortunate attachment to me had not sprung up in the young man

that I have before mentioned, which attachment I can never sufficiently

regret was reciprocated by myself.

“I battled against the impulse that constrained me to love him, but

all my efforts were of no avail. He promised to marry me, which in

an evil hour I agreed to. He had a mock ceremony performed by his

footman, and I went into lodgings that he had taken for me in Gower

Street, Tottenham Court Road. He used to visit me very frequently

for the ensuing six months, and we lived together as man and wife.

At the expiration of that time he took me to the sea-side, and we

subsequently travelled on the Continent. We were at Baden when we

heard of his father’s death. This didn’t trouble him much. He did not

even go to England to attend the funeral, for he had by his conduct

offended his father, and estranged himself from the remainder of his

family. Soon letters came from a solicitor informing him that the

provisions of the will discontinued the allowance of five hundred a

year hitherto made to him, and left him a small sum of money sufficient

to buy himself a commission in the army, if he chose to do so. This

course he was strongly advised to take, for it was urged that he might

support himself on his pay if he volunteered for foreign service. He

was transported with rage when this communication reached him, and he

immediately wrote for the legacy he was entitled to, which arrived in

due course. That evening he went to the gaming table, and lost every

farthing he had in the world. The next morning he was a corpse. His

remains were found in a secluded part of the town, he having in a fit

of desperation blown his brains out with a pistol. He had evidently

resolved to take this step before he left me, if he should happen to be

unfortunate, for he left a letter in the hands of our landlady to be

delivered to me in the event of his not returning in the morning. It

was full of protestations of affection for me, and concluded with an

avowal of the fraud he had practised towards me when our acquaintance

was first formed, which he endeavoured to excuse by stating his

objections to be hampered or fettered by legal impediments.

“When I read this, I somewhat doubted the intensity of the affection

he paraded in his letter. I had no doubt about the fervour of my own

passion, and for some time I was inconsolable. At length, I was roused

to a sense of my desolate position, and to the necessity for action,

by the solicitations and importunity of my landlady, and I sold the

better part of my wardrobe to obtain sufficient money to pay my bills,

and return to England. But fate ordered things in a different manner.

Several of my husband’s friends came to condole with me on his untimely

decease; among whom was a young officer of considerable personal

attractions, who I had often thought I should have liked to love, if

I had not been married to my friend’s husband. It was this man who

caused me to take the second fatal step I have made in my life. If I

had only gone home, my friends might have forgiven everything. I felt

they would, and my pride did not stand in my way, for I would gladly

have asked and obtained their forgiveness for a fault in reality very

venial, when the circumstances under which it was committed are taken

into consideration.

“Or I might have represented the facts to the family; and while

the mother mourned the death of her son, she must have felt some

commiseration for myself.

“The officer asked me to live with him, and made the prospect he held

out to me so glittering and fascinating that I yielded. He declared

he would marry me with pleasure on the spot, but he would forfeit a

large sum of money, that he must inherit in a few years if he remained

single, and it would be folly not to wait until then. I have forgotten

to mention that I had not any children. My constitution being very

delicate, my child was born dead, which was a sad blow to me, although

it did not seem to affect the man I regarded as my husband. We soon

left Baden and returned to London, where I lived for a month very

happily with my paramour, who was not separated from me, as his leave

of absence had not expired. When that event occurred he reluctantly

left me to go to Limerick, where his regiment was quartered. There

in all probability he formed a fresh acquaintance, for he wrote to

me in about a fortnight, saying that a separation must take place

between us, for reasons that he was not at liberty to apprise me of,

and he enclosed a cheque for fifty pounds, which he hoped would pay my

expences. It was too late now to go home, and I was driven to a life

of prostitution, not because I had a liking for it, but as a means of

getting enough money to live upon. For ten years I lived first with one

man then with another, until at last I was infected with a disease,

of which I did not know the evil effects if neglected. The disastrous

consequence of that neglect is only too apparent now. You will be

disgusted, when I tell you that it attacked my face, and ruined my

features to such an extent that I am hideous to look upon, and should

be noticed by no one if I frequented those places where women of my

class most congregate; indeed, I should be driven away with curses and

execrations.”

This recital is melancholy in the extreme. Here was a woman endowed

with a very fair amount of education, speaking in a superior manner,

making use of words that very few in her position would know how to

employ, reduced by a variety of circumstances to the very bottom of a

prostitute’s career. In reply to my further questioning, she said she

lived in a small place in Westminster called Perkins’ Rents, where for

one room she paid two shillings a week. The Rents were in Westminster,

not far from Palace-yard. She was obliged to have recourse to her

present way of living to exist; for she would not go to the workhouse,

and she could get no work to do. She could sew, and she could paint in

water-colours, but she was afraid to be alone. She could not sit hours

and hours by herself, her thoughts distracted her, and drove her mad.

She added, she once thought of turning Roman Catholic, and getting

admitted into a convent, where she might make atonement for her way of

living by devoting the remainder of her life to penitence, but she was

afraid she had gone too far to be forgiven. That was some time ago. Now

she did not think she would live long, she had injured her constitution

so greatly; she had some internal disease, she didn’t know what it was,

but a hospital surgeon told her it would kill her in time, and she had

her moments, generally hours, of oblivion, when she was intoxicated,

which she always was when she could get a chance. If she got ten

shillings from a drunken man, either by persuasion or threats, and she

was not scrupulous in the employment of the latter, she would not come

to the Park for days, until all her money was spent; on an average,

she came three times a week, or perhaps twice; always on Sunday, which

was a good day. She knew all about the Refuges. She had been in one

once, but she didn’t like the system; there wasn’t enough liberty, and

too much preaching, and that sort of thing; and then they couldn’t

keep her there always; so they didn’t know what to do with her. No one

would take her into their service, because they didn’t like to look at

her face, which presented so dreadful an appearance that it frightened

people. She always wore a long thick veil, that concealed her features,

and made her interesting to the unsuspicious and unwise. I gave her

the money I promised her, and advised her again to enter a Refuge,

which she refused to do, saying she could not live long, and she would

rather die as she was. As I had no power to compel her to change her

determination, I left her, lamenting her hardihood and obstinacy. I

felt that she soon would be--

“One more unfortunate,

Weary of breath,

Rashly importunate,

Gone to her death.”

In the course of my peregrinations I met another woman, commonly

dressed in old and worn-out clothes; her face was ugly and mature; she

was perhaps on the shady side of forty. She was also perambulating

the Mall. I knew she could only be there for one purpose, and I

interrogated her, and I believe she answered my queries faithfully. She

said:--

“I have a husband, and seven small children, the eldest not yet able to

do much more than cadge a penny or so by cater-wheeling and tumbling

in the street for the amusement of gents as rides outside ’busses. My

husband’s bedridden, and can’t do nothink but give the babies a dose of

‘Mother’s Blessing’ (that’s laudanum, sir, or some sich stuff) to sleep

’em when they’s squally. So I goes out begging all day, and I takes

in general one of the kids in my arms and one as runs by me, and we

sell hartifishal flowers, leastways ’olds ’em in our ’ands, and makes

believe cos of the police, as is nasty so be as you ’as nothink soever,

and I comes hout in the Parks, sir, at night sometimes when I’ve ’ad a

bad day, and ain’t made above a few pence, which ain’t enough to keep

us as we should be kep. I mean, sir, the children should have a bit of

meat, and my ole man and me wants some blue ruin to keep our spirits

up; so I’se druv to it, sir, by poverty, and nothink on the face of

God’s blessed earth, sir, shou’dn’t have druv me but that for the poor

babes must live, and who ’as they to look to but their ’ard-working but

misfortunate mother, which she is now talking to your honour, and won’t

yer give a poor woman a hap’ny, sir? I’ve seven small children at home,

and my ’usban’s laid with the fever. You won’t miss it, yer honour,

only a ’apny for a poor woman as ain’t ’ad a bit of bread between

her teeth since yesty morning. I ax yer parding,” she exclaimed,

interrupting herself--“I forgot I was talking to yourself. I’s so used

though to this way of speaking when I meant to ax you for summut I

broke off into the old slang, but yer honour knows what I mean: ain’t

yer got even a little sixpence to rejoice the heart of the widow?”

“You call yourself a widow now,” I said, “while before you said you

were married and had seven children. Which are you?”

“Which am I? The first I toll you’s the true. But Lor’, I’s up to

so many dodges I gets what you may call confounded; sometimes I’s

a widder, and wants me ’art rejoiced with a copper, and then I’s a

hindustrious needle-woman thrown out of work and going to be druv into

the streets if I don’t get summut to do. Sometimes I makes a lot of

money by being a poor old cripple as broke her arm in a factory, by

being blowed hup when a steam-engine blowed herself hup, and I bandage

my arm and swell it out hawful big, and when I gets home, we gets in

some lush and ’as some frens, and goes in for a reglar blow-hout, and

now as I have told yer honour hall about it, won’t yer give us an ’apny

as I observe before?”

It is very proper that the Parks should be closed at an early hour,

when such creatures as I have been describing exist and practise their

iniquities so unblushingly. One only gets at the depravity of mankind

by searching below the surface of society; and for certain purposes

such knowledge and information are useful and beneficial to the

community. Therefore the philanthropist must overcome his repugnance

to the task, and draw back the veil that is thinly spread over the

skeleton.

THE DEPENDANTS OF PROSTITUTES.

Having described the habits, &c., of different classes of prostitutes,

I now come to those who are intimately connected with, and dependant

upon, them. This is a very numerous class, and includes “Bawds,” or

those who keep brothels, the followers of dress lodgers, keepers of

accommodation houses, procuresses, pimps, and panders, fancy men, and

bullies.

_Bawds._--The first head in our classification is “Bawds.” They may

be either men or women. More frequently they are the latter, though

any one who keeps an immoral house, or bawdy-house, as it is more

commonly called, is liable to that designation. Bawdy-houses are of

two kinds. They may be either houses of accommodation, or houses in

which women lodge, are boarded, clothed, &c., and the proceeds of whose

prostitution goes into the pocket of the bawd herself, who makes a very

handsome income generally by their shame.

We cannot have a better example of this sort of thing than the

bawdy-houses in King’s Place, St. James’s, a narrow passage leading

from Pall Mall opposite the “Guards Club” into King Street, not far

from the St. James’s theatre. These are both houses of accommodation

and brothels proper. Men may take their women there, and pay so much

for a room and temporary accommodation, or they may be supplied with

women who live in the house. The unfortunate creatures who live in

these houses are completely in the power of the bawds, who grow fat

on their prostitution. When they first came to town perhaps they were

strangers, and didn’t know a soul in the place, and even now they would

have nowhere to go to if they were able to make their escape, which is

a very difficult thing to accomplish, considering they are vigilantly

looked after night and day. They have nothing fit to walk about the

streets in. They are often in bed all day, and at night dressed up in

tawdry ball costumes. If they ever do go out on business, they are

carefully watched by one of the servants: they generally end when their

charms are faded by being servants of bawds and prostitutes, or else

watchers, or perhaps both.

There are houses in Oxendon Street too, where women are kept in this

way.

A victim of this disgraceful practice told me she was entrapped when

she was sixteen years old, and prostituted for some time to old men,

who paid a high price for the enjoyment of her person.

“I was born at Matlock in Derbyshire,” she began; “father was a

stonecutter, and I worked in the shop, polishing the blocks and things,

and in the spring of ’51 we heard of the Great Exhibition. I wished

very much to go to London, and see the fine shops and that, and father

wrote to an aunt of mine, who lived in London, to know if I might come

and stay a week or two with her to see the Exhibition. In a few days

a letter came back, saying she would be glad to give me a room for

two or three weeks and go about with me. Father couldn’t come with me

because of his business, and I went alone. When I arrived, aunt had

a very bad cold, and couldn’t get out of bed. Of course, I wanted to

go about and see things, for though I didn’t believe the streets were

paved with gold, I was very anxious to see the shops and places I’d

heard so much about. Aunt said when she was better she’d take me, but

I was so restless I would go by myself. I said nothing to aunt about

it, and stole out one evening. I wandered about for some time, very

much pleased with the novelty. The crowds of people, the flaring gas

jets, and everything else, all was so strange and new, I was delighted.

At last I lost myself, and got into some streets ever so much darker

and quieter. I saw one door in the middle of the street open, that is

standing a-jar. Thinking no harm, I knocked, and hearing no sound, and

getting no answer, I knocked louder, when some one came and instantly

admitted me, without saying a word. I asked her innocently enough where

I was, and if she would tell me the way to Bank Place. I didn’t know

where Bank Place was, whether it was in Lambeth, or Kensington, or

Hammersmith, or where; but I have since heard it is in Kensington. The

woman who let me in, and to whom I addressed my questions, laughed at

this, and said, ‘Oh! yes, I wasn’t born yesterday.’ But I repeated,

‘Where am I, and what am I to do?’

“She told me to ‘ax,’ and said she’d heard that before.

“I suppose I ought to tell you, before I go further,” she explained,

“that ‘ax’ meant ask, or find out.

“Just then a door opened, and an old woman came out of a room which

seemed to me to be the parlour. ‘Come in, my dear,’ she exclaimed, ‘and

sit down.’ I followed her into the room, and she pulled out a bottle

of gin, asking me if I would have a drop of something short, while she

poured out some, which I was too frightened to refuse. She said, ‘I

likes to be jolly myself and see others so. I’m getting on now. Ain’t

what I was once. But as I says I likes to be jolly, and I always is. A

old fiddle, you know, makes the best music.

“‘Market full, my dear,’ she added, pushing the wine-glass of gin

towards me. ‘Ah! I s’pose not yet; too arly, so it is. I’s glad you’ve

dropped in to see a body. I’ve noticed your face lots of times, but

I thought you was one of Lotty’s girls, and wouldn’t condescend to

come so far up the street, though, why one part should be better nor

another, I’m sure, I can’t make out.’

“‘Really you must make a mistake,’ I interposed. ‘I am quite a stranger

in London; indeed I have only been three days in town. The fact is, I

lost myself this evening, and seeing your door open, I thought I would

come in and ask the way.’

“Whilst I was saying this, the old woman listened attentively. She

seemed to drink in every word of my explanation, and a great change

came over her features.

“‘Well, pet,’ she replied, ‘I’m glad you’ve come to my house. You must

excuse my taking you for some one else; but you are so like a gal I

knows, one Polly Gay, I couldn’t help mistaking you. Where are you

staying?’

“I told her I was staying with my aunt in Bank Place.

“‘Oh! really,’ she exclaimed; ‘well, that is fortunate, ’pon my word,

that is lucky. I’m gladder than ever now you came to my shop--I mean

my house--cos I knows your aunt very well. Me an’ ’er’s great frens,

leastways was, though I haven’t seen her for six months come next

Christmas. Is she’s took bad, is she? Ah! well, it’s the weather, or

somethink, that’s what it is; we’re all ill sometimes; and what is

it as is the matter with her? Influenzy, is it? Now, Lor’ bless us,

the influenzy! Well, you’ll stay with me to-night; you’s ever so far

from your place. Don’t say No; you must, my dear, and we’ll go down to

aunt’s to-morrow morning arly; she’ll be glad to see me, I know. She

always was fond of her old friends.’

London Labour and the London Poor, Vol. 4 · 第 52 / 99 段