Our present navy was begun in 1882. At that period our navy consisted

of a collection of antiquated wooden ships, already almost as out of

place against modern war vessels as the galleys of Alcibiades and

Hamilcar—certainly as the ships of Tromp and Blake. Nor at that time

did we have men fit to handle a modern man-of-war. Under the wise

legislation of the Congress and the successful administration of a

succession of patriotic Secretaries of the Navy, belonging to both

political parties, the work of upbuilding the navy went on, and ships

equal to any in the world of their kind were continually added; and

what was even more important, these ships were exercised at sea singly

and in squadrons until the men aboard them were able to get the

best possible service out of them. The result was seen in the short

war with Spain, which was decided with such rapidity because of the

infinitely greater preparedness of our navy than of the Spanish navy.

While awarding the fullest honor to the men who actually commanded

and manned the ships which destroyed the Spanish sea forces in the

Philippines and in Cuba, we must not forget that an equal meed of

praise belongs to those without whom neither blow could have been

struck. The Congressmen who voted years in advance the money to

lay down the ships, to build the guns, to buy the armor plate; the

Department officials and the business men and wage-workers who

furnished what the Congress had authorized; the Secretaries of the

Navy who asked for and expended the appropriations; and finally

the officers who, in fair weather and foul, on actual sea service,

trained and disciplined the crews of the ships when there was no war

in sight—all are entitled to a full share in the glory of Manila and

Santiago, and the respect accorded by every true American to those who

wrought such signal triumph for our country. It was forethought and

preparation which secured us the overwhelming triumph of 1898. If we

fail to show forethought and preparation now, there may come a time

when disaster will befall us instead of triumph; and should this time

come, the fault will rest primarily, not upon those whom the accident

of events puts in supreme command at the moment, but upon those who

have failed to prepare in advance.

There should be no cessation in the work of completing our navy. So

far ingenuity has been wholly unable to devise a substitute for the

great war craft whose hammering guns beat out the mastery of the high

seas. It is unsafe and unwise not to provide this year for several

additional battleships and heavy armored cruisers, with auxiliary

and lighter craft in proportion; for the exact numbers and character

I refer you to the report of the Secretary of the Navy. But there

is something we need even more than additional ships, and this is

additional officers and men. To provide battleships and cruisers and

then lay them up, with the expectation of leaving them unmanned until

they are needed in actual war, would be worse than folly; it would be

a crime against the nation.

To send any warship against a competent enemy unless those aboard it

have been trained by years of actual sea service, including incessant

gunnery practice, would be to invite not merely disaster, but the

bitterest shame and humiliation. Four thousand additional seamen and

one thousand additional marines should be provided; and an increase

in the officers should be provided by making a large addition to

the classes at Annapolis. There is one small matter which should be

mentioned in connection with Annapolis. The pretentious and unmeaning

title of “naval cadet” should be abolished; the title of “midshipman,”

full of historic association, should be restored.

Even in time of peace a warship should be used until it wears out,

for only so can it be kept fit to respond to any emergency. The

officers and men alike should be kept as much as possible on blue

water, for it is there only they can learn their duties as they

should be learned. The big vessels should be manœuvred in squadrons

containing not merely battleships, but the necessary proportion of

cruisers and scouts. The torpedo boats should be handled by the

younger officers in such manner as will best fit the latter to take

responsibility and meet the emergencies of actual warfare.

Every detail ashore which can be performed by a civilian should

be so performed, the officer being kept for his special duty in

the sea service. Above all, gunnery practice should be unceasing.

It is important to have our navy of adequate size, but it is even

more important that ship for ship it should equal in efficiency any

navy in the world. This is possible only with highly drilled crews

and officers, and this in turn imperatively demands continuous and

progressive instruction in target practice, ship handling, squadron

tactics, and general discipline. Our ships must be assembled in

squadrons actively cruising away from harbors and never long at

anchor. The resulting wear upon engines and hulls must be endured;

a battleship worn out in long training of officers and men is well

paid for by the results, while, on the other hand, no matter in how

excellent condition, it is useless if the crew be not expert.

We now have seventeen battleships appropriated for, of which nine are

completed and have been commissioned for actual service. The remaining

eight will be ready in from two to four years, but it will take at

least that time to recruit and train the men to fight them. It is of

vast concern that we have trained crews ready for the vessels by the

time they are commissioned. Good ships and good guns are simply good

weapons, and the best weapons are useless save in the hands of men who

know how to fight with them. The men must be trained and drilled under

a thorough and well-planned system of progressive instruction, while

the recruiting must be carried on with still greater vigor. Every

effort must be made to exalt the main function of the officer—the

command of men. The leading graduates of the Naval Academy should be

assigned to the combatant branches, the line and marines.

Many of the essentials of success are already recognized by the

General Board, which, as the central office of a growing staff, is

moving steadily toward a proper war efficiency and a proper efficiency

of the whole Navy, under the Secretary. This General Board, by

fostering the creation of a general staff, is providing for the

official and then the general recognition of our altered conditions as

a nation and of the true meaning of a great war fleet, which meaning

is, first, the best men, and, second, the best ships.

The Naval Militia forces are State organizations, and are trained for

coast service, and in event of war they will constitute the inner line

of defence. They should receive hearty encouragement from the General

Government.

But in addition we should at once provide for a National Naval

Reserve, organized and trained under the direction of the Navy

Department, and subject to the call of the Chief Executive whenever

war becomes imminent. It should be a real auxiliary to the naval

seagoing peace establishment, and offer material to be drawn on at

once for manning our ships in time of war. It should be composed

of graduates of the Naval Academy, graduates of the Naval Militia,

officers and crews of coast-line steamers, longshore schooners,

fishing vessels, and steam yachts, together with the coast population

about such centres as life-saving stations and light-houses.

The American people must either build and maintain an adequate navy

or else make up their minds definitely to accept a secondary position

in international affairs, not merely in political, but in commercial,

matters. It has been well said that there is no surer way of courting

national disaster than to be “opulent, aggressive, and unarmed.”

* * * * *

It is not necessary to increase our army beyond its present size at

this time. But it is necessary to keep it at the highest point of

efficiency. The individual units who as officers and enlisted men

compose this army, are, we have good reason to believe, at least as

efficient as those of any other army in the entire world. It is our

duty to see that their training is of a kind to insure the highest

possible expression of power to these units when acting in combination.

The conditions of modern war are such as to make an infinitely heavier

demand than ever before upon the individual character and capacity of

the officer and the enlisted man, and to make it far more difficult

for men to act together with effect. At present the fighting must

be done in extended order, which means that each man must act for

himself and at the same time act in combination with others with whom

he is no longer in the old-fashioned elbow-to-elbow touch. Under such

conditions a few men of the highest excellence are worth more than

many men without the special skill which is only found as the result

of special training applied to men of exceptional physique and morale.

But nowadays the most valuable fighting man and the most difficult to

perfect is the rifleman who is also a skilful and daring rider.

The proportion of our cavalry regiments has wisely been increased.

The American cavalryman, trained to manœuvre and fight with equal

facility on foot and on horseback, is the best type of soldier for

general purposes now to be found in the world. The ideal cavalryman of

the present day is a man who can fight on foot as effectively as the

best infantryman, and who is in addition unsurpassed in the care and

management of his horse and in his ability to fight on horseback.

A general staff should be created. As for the present staff and supply

departments, they should be filled by details from the line, the men

so detailed returning after a while to their line duties. It is very

undesirable to have the senior grades of the army composed of men

who have come to fill the positions by the mere fact of seniority. A

system should be adopted by which there shall be an elimination grade

by grade of those who seem unfit to render the best service in the

next grade. Justice to the veterans of the Civil War who are still in

the army would seem to require that in the matter of retirements they

be given by law the same privileges accorded to their comrades in the

navy.

The process of elimination of the least fit should be conducted in a

manner that would render it practically impossible to apply political

or social pressure on behalf of any candidate, so that each man may

be judged purely on his own merits. Pressure for the promotion of

civil officials for political reasons is bad enough, but it is tenfold

worse where applied on behalf of officers of the army or navy. Every

promotion and every detail under the War Department must be made

solely with regard to the good of the service and to the capacity and

merit of the man himself. No pressure, political, social, or personal,

of any kind, will be permitted to exercise the least effect in any

question of promotion or detail; and if there is reason to believe

that such pressure is exercised at the instigation of the officer

concerned, it will be held to militate against him. In our army we can

not afford to have rewards or duties distributed save on the simple

ground that those who by their own merits are entitled to the rewards

get them, and that those who are peculiarly fit to do the duties are

chosen to perform them.

Every effort should be made to bring the army to a constantly

increasing state of efficiency. When on actual service no work save

that directly in the line of such service should be required. The

paper work in the army, as in the navy, should be greatly reduced.

What is needed is proved power of command and capacity to work well

in the field. Constant care is necessary to prevent dry rot in the

transportation and commissary departments.

Our army is so small and so much scattered that it is very difficult

to give the higher officers (as well as the lower officers and

the enlisted men) a chance to practice manœuvres in mass and on a

comparatively large scale. In time of need no amount of individual

excellence would avail against the paralysis which would follow

inability to work as a coherent whole, under skilful and daring

leadership. The Congress should provide means whereby it will be

possible to have field exercises by at least a division of regulars,

and if possible also a division of national guardsmen, once a year.

These exercises might take the form of field manœuvres; or, if on

the Gulf Coast or the Pacific or Atlantic Seaboard, or in the region

of the Great Lakes, the army corps when assembled could be marched

from some inland point to some point on the water, there embarked,

disembarked after a couple of days’ journey at some other point, and

again marched inland. Only by actual handling and providing for men in

masses while they are marching, camping, embarking, and disembarking,

will it be possible to train the higher officers to perform their

duties well and smoothly.

A great debt is owing from the public to the men of the army and navy.

They should be so treated as to enable them to reach the highest point

of efficiency, so that they may be able to respond instantly to any

demand made upon them to sustain the interests of the nation and the

honor of the flag. The individual American enlisted man is probably

on the whole a more formidable fighting man than the regular of any

other army. Every consideration should be shown him, and in return the

highest standard of usefulness should be exacted from him. It is well

worth while for the Congress to consider whether the pay of enlisted

men upon second and subsequent enlistments should not be increased to

correspond with the increased value of the veteran soldier.

Much good has already come from the act reorganizing the army, passed

early in the present year. The three prime reforms, all of them of

literally inestimable value, are, first, the substitution of four-year

details from the line for permanent appointments in the so-called

staff divisions; second, the establishment of a corps of artillery

with a chief at the head; third, the establishment of a maximum and

minimum limit for the army. It would be difficult to overestimate the

improvement in the efficiency of our army which these three reforms

are making, and have in part already effected.

The reorganization provided for by the act has been substantially

accomplished. The improved conditions in the Philippines have

enabled the War Department materially to reduce the military charge

upon our revenue and to arrange the number of soldiers so as to

bring this number much nearer to the minimum than to the maximum

limit established by law. There is, however, need of supplementary

legislation. Thorough military education must be provided, and in

addition to the regulars the advantages of this education should be

given to the officers of the National Guard and others in civil life

who desire intelligently to fit themselves for possible military duty.

The officers should be given the chance to perfect themselves by study

in the higher branches of this art. At West Point the education should

be of the kind most apt to turn out men who are good in actual field

service; too much stress should not be laid on mathematics, nor should

proficiency therein be held to establish the right of entry to a corps

d’élite. The typical American officer of the best kind need not be a

good mathematician; but he must be able to master himself, to control

others, and to show boldness and fertility of resource in every

emergency.

Action should be taken in reference to the militia and to the raising

of volunteer forces. Our militia law is obsolete and worthless. The

organization and armament of the National Guard of the several

States, which are treated as militia in the appropriations by the

Congress, should be made identical with those provided for the regular

forces. The obligations and duties of the Guard in time of war should

be carefully defined, and a system established by law under which the

method of procedure of raising volunteer forces should be prescribed

in advance. It is utterly impossible in the excitement and haste of

impending war to do this satisfactorily if the arrangements have not

been made long beforehand. Provision should be made for utilizing in

the first volunteer organizations called out the training of those

citizens who have already had experience under arms, and especially

for the selection in advance of the officers of any force which may

be raised; for careful selection of the kind necessary is impossible

after the outbreak of war.

That the army is not at all a mere instrument of destruction has been

shown during the last three years. In the Philippines, Cuba, and Porto

Rico it has proved itself a great constructive force, a most potent

implement for the upbuilding of a peaceful civilization.

* * * * *

No other citizens deserve so well of the Republic as the veterans, the

survivors of those who saved the Union. They did the one deed which

if left undone would have meant that all else in our history went

for nothing. But for their steadfast prowess in the greatest crisis

of our history, all our annals would be meaningless, and our great

experiment in popular freedom and self-government a gloomy failure.

Moreover, they not only left us a united nation, but they left us also

as a heritage the memory of the mighty deeds by which the Nation was

kept united. We are now indeed one nation, one in fact as well as in

name; we are united in our devotion to the flag which is the symbol of

national greatness and unity; and the very completeness of our union

enables us all, in every part of the country, to glory in the valor

shown alike by the sons of the North and the sons of the South in the

times that tried men’s souls.

The men who in the last three years have done so well in the East

and the West Indies and on the mainland of Asia have shown that this

remembrance is not lost. In any serious crisis the United States

must rely for the great mass of its fighting men upon the volunteer

soldiery who do not make a permanent profession of the military

career; and whenever such a crisis arises the deathless memories of

the Civil War will give to Americans the lift of lofty purpose which

comes to those whose fathers have stood valiantly in the forefront of

the battle.

* * * * *

The merit system of making appointments is in its essence as

democratic and American as the common school system itself. It

simply means that in clerical and other positions where the duties

are entirely non-political, all applicants should have a fair field

and no favor, each standing on his merits as he is able to show them

by practical test. Written competitive examinations offer the only

available means in many cases for applying this system. In other

cases, as where laborers are employed, a system of registration

undoubtedly can be widely extended. There are, of course, places

where the written competitive examination can not be applied, and

others where it offers by no means an ideal solution, but where under

existing political conditions it is, though an imperfect means, yet

the best present means of getting satisfactory results.

Wherever the conditions have permitted the application of the merit

system in its fullest and widest sense, the gain to the government has

been immense. The navy yards and postal service illustrate, probably

better than any other branches of the government, the great gain

in economy, efficiency, and honesty due to the enforcement of this

principle.

I recommend the passage of a law which will extend the classified

service to the District of Columbia, or will at least enable the

President thus to extend it. In my judgment all laws providing for the

temporary employment of clerks should hereafter contain a provision

that they be selected under the Civil Service Law.

It is important to have this system obtain at home, but it is even

more important to have it applied rigidly in our insular possessions.

Not an office should be filled in the Philippines or Porto Rico with

any regard to the man’s partisan affiliations or services, with any

regard to the political, social, or personal influence which he may

have at his command; in short, heed should be paid to absolutely

nothing save the man’s own character and capacity and the needs of the

service.

The administration of these islands should be as wholly free from the

suspicion of partisan politics as the administration of the army and

navy. All that we ask from the public servant in the Philippines or

Porto Rico is that he reflect honor on his country by the way in which

he makes that country’s rule a benefit to the peoples who have come

under it. This is all that we should ask, and we can not afford to be

content with less.

The merit system is simply one method of securing honest and efficient

administration of the government; and in the long run the sole

justification of any type of government lies in its proving itself

both honest and efficient.

* * * * *

The consular service is now organized under the provisions of a law

passed in 1856, which is entirely inadequate to existing conditions.

The interest shown by so many commercial bodies throughout the country

in the reorganization of the service is heartily commended to your

attention. Several bills providing for a new consular service have in

recent years been submitted to the Congress. They are based upon the

just principle that appointments to the service should be made only

after a practical test of the applicant’s fitness, that promotions

should be governed by trustworthiness, adaptability, and zeal in

the performance of duty, and that the tenure of office should be

unaffected by partisan considerations.

The guardianship and fostering of our rapidly expanding foreign

commerce, the protection of American citizens resorting to foreign

countries in lawful pursuit of their affairs, and the maintenance of

the dignity of the Nation abroad, combine to make it essential that

our consuls should be men of character, knowledge, and enterprise.

It is true that the service is now, in the main, efficient, but a

standard of excellence can not be permanently maintained until the

principles set forth in the bills heretofore submitted to the Congress

on this subject are enacted into law.

* * * * *

In my judgment the time has arrived when we should definitely make up

our minds to recognize the Indian as an individual and not as a member

of a tribe. The General Allotment Act is a mighty pulverizing engine

to break up the tribal mass. It acts directly upon the family and the

individual. Under its provisions some sixty thousand Indians have

already become citizens of the United States. We should now break up

the tribal funds, doing for them what allotment does for the tribal

lands; that is, they should be divided into individual holdings. There

will be a transition period during which the funds will in many cases

have to be held in trust. This is the case also with the lands. A stop

should be put upon the indiscriminate permission to Indians to lease

their allotments. The effort should be steadily to make the Indian

work like any other man on his own ground. The marriage laws of the

Indians should be made the same as those of the whites.

In the schools the education should be elementary and largely

industrial. The need of higher education among the Indians is very,

very limited. On the reservations care should be taken to try to suit

the teaching to the needs of the particular Indian. There is no use in

attempting to induce agriculture in a country suited only for cattle

raising, where the Indian should be made a stock grower. The ration

system, which is merely the corral and the reservation system, is

highly detrimental to the Indians. It promotes beggary, perpetuates

pauperism, and stifles industry. It is an effectual barrier to

progress. It must continue to a greater or less degree as long as

tribes are herded on reservations and have everything in common. The

Indian should be treated as an individual—like the white man. During

the change of treatment inevitable hardships will occur; every effort

should be made to minimize these hardships; but we should not because

of them hesitate to make the change. There should be a continuous

reduction in the number of agencies.

* * * * *

Presidential addresses and state papers, Volume 2 (of 7) · 第 11 / 27 段