IS THE RICH YOUNG MAN HANDICAPPED?

President Eliot, of Harvard, Tells of

the Blessings of Poverty and the

Penalties of Great Wealth.

Is wealth a hindrance to a young man starting out in life? Men who have

built their own fortunes are almost unanimous in answering yes. To have

nothing to begin with means, they say, illimitable opportunity, and

opportunity is the great developing factor; poverty means the stimulus of

real need, which impels men to take advantage of opportunity. To quote the

present Lord Mayor of London, Alderman Walter V. Morgan:

The best thing that can happen to a young man is to be poor.

Extreme poverty may sometimes hamper a youth's progress,

but, in my opinion, he is far more likely to make his way in

the world if he starts with the proverbial half-a-crown in

his pocket than with a thousand-pound note.

Riches carry their own penalty. President Eliot, in a recent address

before the student body at Harvard, said:

The very rich are by no means the healthiest members of the community, and

to escape the perils of luxurious living requires unusual will-power and

prudence.

Great capital at the disposal of a single individual confers on its

possessor great power over the course of industrial development, over his

fellow men and sometimes over the course of great public events, like

peace or war between nations. It enables a man to do good or harm, to give

joy or pain, and places him in a position to be feared or looked up to.

There is pleasure in the satisfaction of directing such a power, and the

greater the character the greater may be the satisfaction. In giving this

direction the great capitalist may find an enjoyable and strenuous

occupation. For a conscientious, dutiful man a great sense of

responsibility accompanies this power. It may become so powerful as to

wipe out the enjoyment itself.

The most serious disadvantage under which the very rich have labored is

the bringing up of children. It is well-nigh impossible for a very rich

man to develop his children from habits of indifference and laziness.

These children are so situated that they have no opportunity of doing

productive labor, and do nothing for themselves, parents, brothers, or

sisters, no one acquiring the habit of work. In striking contrast are the

farmer's children, who cooperate at tender years in the work of the

household.

Among President Eliot's hearers were many young men to whom the blessings

of poverty were unknown.

The Scrap Book. Volume 1, No. 2 April 1906 · 第 4 / 150 题