CHAPTER XIII.

1689-1696.

Company's Claims Mentioned in Declaration of War -- Parliament

Grants Company's Application for Confirmation of its Charter --

Implacability of the Felt-makers -- Fort Albany not a Success

in the hands of the French -- Denonville urges an Attack upon

Fort Nelson -- Lewis Despatches Tast with a Fleet to Canada --

Iberville's Jealousy prevents its Sailing to the Bay --

Governor Phipps Burns Fort Nelson -- Further Agitation on the

part of the French to Possess the West Main -- Company Makes

another attempt to Regain Fort Albany -- Fort Nelson

Surrendered to Iberville -- Its Re-conquest by the Company.

Upon William the Third's accession to the throne, the Company renewed

its claims to its property, and for reparation for the damages it had

suffered at the hands of the French in time of peace.

"As to the article of the Company's losses, it will appear," it said,

"by a true and exact estimate, that the French took from the Company,

in full peace between 1682 and 1688, seven ships with their cargoes,

and six forts and factories, from which they carried away great stores

of goods laid up for trading with the Indians. The whole amounts to

£38,332 15s."

To such effect was this memorial presented to the King that William

caused the hostile proceedings of Lewis in the Company's territory to

be inserted in one of the articles of his Declaration of War, in these

words:--

"But that the French King should invade our Caribbee Islands

and possess himself of our territories of the Province of New

York and Hudson's Bay, in hostile manner, seizing our forts,

burning our subjects' houses and enriching his people with the

spoil of our goods and merchandises, detaining some of our

subjects under the hardships of imprisonment, causing others to

be inhumanly killed, and driving the rest to sea in a small

vessel without food or necessaries to support them, are

actions not even becoming an enemy; and yet he was so far from

declaring himself so, that at that very time he was negotiating

here in England, by his Ministers, a treaty of neutrality and

good correspondence in America."

Much has been made by later writers, hostile to the Company, of a

circumstance which soon afterwards took place.

[Sidenote: The Company's charter confirmed.]

Owing to the state of public feeling in England towards the Stewarts

at the time of the Revolution, the Company, keenly alive to the fact

of the exiled king's having been so recently its Governor, sought at

the beginning of William's reign to strengthen its position by an Act

of Parliament for the charter granted by Charles II. Why, have asked

its enemies, if the Company had the utmost confidence in its charter

did it resort to the Lords and Commons to have it confirmed? And why

was this confirmation limited to but seven years? I have already

answered the first question; as to the second, the Company itself

asked for no longer period. The proceeding was no secret; it was done

openly. Parliament made but one stipulation, and that at the instance

of the Felt-makers' Company; that the adventurers "should be obliged

to make at least two sales of 'coat beaver' annually, and not

exceeding four. These should be proportioned in lotts of about £100

sterling each, and not exceeding £200. In the intervals of public

sales the Company should be debarred from selling beaver by private

Contract, or at any price than was sett up at the last Publick sale."

The Company asked for a confirmation of its charter by Parliament as a

prudent course in uncertain times; and also in order to more firmly

establish its claim to reparation for damages. The nation's

representatives saw no reason why they should not issue a

confirmation; there being none, save the Felt-makers, to oppose it.

[Sidenote: The Company increases its capital.]

The charter being confirmed, it was decided that the nominal capital

of the Company should be increased to £31,500, several good reasons

being put forward in committee for thus trebling the stock. These

reasons are quaintly enumerated as follows:

I--That the Company have actually in Warehouse above the value of

their first original stock.

II--That they have set out an Expedition this Yeare in their Shipps

and Cargoe to more than the Value of their First Stock again; the

trading of which Goods may well be estimated, in expectation as much

more.

III--That our Factories at Port Nelson River and New Severne are under

an increasing Trade; and that our Returns in Beavers this yeare (by

God's Blessing) are modestly expected to be worth 20,000_l._

IV--Our Forts, Factories, Guns and other Materials, the prospect of

new Settlements and further Trade, are also reasonably to be estimated

at a considerable intrinsic Value.

V--And lastly, our just Expectancy of a very considerable reparation

and satisfaction from the French and the close of this War and the

restoring our places and Trade at the Bottom of the Bay; which upon

proof, hath been made out above 100,000_l._

Some years later the Treaty of Ryswick, in securing to the French the

fruits of Iberville's victory, powerfully affected for ill the

fortunes of the Company. Nevertheless, the whole nation was then in

sympathy with its cause, knowing that but for the continued existence

of the Honourable Adventurers as a body corporate the chances of the

western portion of the Bay reverting to the English were small.

But the Felt-makers were implacable. They would like to have seen the

beaver trade in their own hands. At the expiration of the seven years

for which the confirmation was allowed, they again, as will be shown,

evinced, yet vainly, their enmity.

Because this parliamentary confirmation was limited to so short a

period, some writers have conjectured that at the expiration of that

period the charter ceased to be valid. So absurd a conclusion would

scarcely appear to stand in need of refutation. Could those who

pretend to draw this inference have been ignorant that if some of the

rights conferred by the charter required the sanction of Parliament,

there were other rights conferred by it which required no such

sanction, because they were within the prerogative of the Crown? Even

assuming that at the end of the term for which the act of William and

Mary was passed, such of the provisions of the charter (if there could

be found any such) as derived their efficacy only from parliamentary

support should be considered inefficient, still all the rights similar

to those of the charters for former governments and plantations in

America would continue to exist. That they were so regarded as

existing is made evident by the repeated references to them in various

subsequent international treaties and acts of Parliament. King George

and his advisers completely recognized the Company as proprietors of a

certain domain. In establishing the limits of the newly-acquired

Province of Canada, it was enacted that it should be bounded on the

north by "the territory granted to the Merchants-Adventurers of

England trading into Hudson's Bay," a boundary which by statute was

long to subsist.

Fort Albany did not prove a success in the hands of the French. The

Quebec Company were losing money, and they had no ships. They were,

besides, severely handicapped by physical conditions, owing to the

inaccessibility of the Bay by land and the impracticability of

carrying merchandise by the overland route. It seemed clear that,

after all, the trade of the Bay could only be made profitable by

sea.[23] The French were consequently most anxious to exchange the

forts on James' Bay for Fort Nelson, because they were aware that

better furs were to be had in the north; and because it would enable

them to intercept the tribes who hunted about Lake Nepigon.

[Sidenote: Denonville plans the capture of Fort Nelson.]

Denonville is now found writing long despatches to Seignely, assuring

him that their affairs at Hudson's Bay would prosper if the Northern

Company continued to co-operate with and second the designs of

Iberville, whose fixed resolve was to go and seize Fort Nelson. For

that purpose Denonville regarded it as necessary that the Minister

should inform M. de Lagny that the King desired the capture of that

fort, and to "furnish Iberville with everything he requires to render

his designs successful." The Governor himself thought one ship added

to those they had captured in 1689 from the English would suffice. He

sought to obtain for Iberville some honourable rank in the navy, as

this would, he urged, excite honourable emulation amongst the

Canadians who were ready to follow the sea. Denonville suggested a

lieutenancy, adding his opinion that his young friend was "a very fine

fellow, capable of rendering himself expert and doing good service."

The plea of the Governor was successful and Lewis was pleased to

confer upon Iberville the rank of lieutenant in the French Royal Navy,

the first distinction of the kind then on record. It fired the blood

and pride of not a few of the Canadian youth, one Peter Gauthier de

Varennes amongst the rest. Many years later he, under the name of

Verandrye, was the first of the great pioneers through the territories

of the Great Company.

All negotiations for an exchange of forts having fallen through, the

_Compagnie du Nord_ determined to make a valiant attempt to obtain

their desires by force. For this purpose they made powerful

application to the Court; and in the autumn of 1691 their petition

resulted in the arrival at Quebec of Admiral Tast with no fewer than

fourteen ships.

It was said in Quebec that while Lewis XIV. surprised his enemies by

his celerity in taking the field in Europe, the vessels sent out to

America by his order always started two or three months too late for

Canada and the Bay. This tardiness, it was declared, was the sole

cause of all the losses and want of success attending French

enterprises in that part of the New World.[24]

However this may be, there was beyond question another and not less

potent reason for the failure which overtook the proposed expedition

of Tast on behalf of the Northern Company. Iberville's successes had

up to this moment tended to bolster up the waning popularity of the

Company in Canada. This popular hero had just returned from the Bay

with 80,000 francs value in beaver skins, and 6,000 livres in small

furs, but he now refused point blank to have anything to do with the

expedition. He did not care to share such glory and profit as he might

obtain with his own followers, with the Company and Admiral Tast.

Without this powerful auxiliary and the support of the populace,

Tast's fleet abandoned its expedition to the Bay, and sailed away to

Acadia and Newfoundland.

[Sidenote: Burning of Fort Nelson.]

Nevertheless, while Governor Phipps was in charge of Fort Nelson this

year, a French frigate belonging to the enemy appeared at the entrance

of Bourbon River. As it chanced that nearly the whole of his garrison

were absent from the fort on a hunting expedition, it seemed to the

Governor that armed resistance would be futile. Rather, therefore,

than allow the fort to pass again into the hands of the French under

circumstances so humiliating, he resolved to burn it, together with a

large part of its merchandise, valued at about £8,000, well knowing

that without the merchandise the French could not procure furs from

the Indians.

Whilst the flames of the fort were ascending, Phipps and three men he

had with him retreated into ambush and established themselves with

some Indians in the interior.

The Frenchman landed, saw the perdition of his hopes in the ruin of

the fort and its contents, and returned to the ship with a few

hatchets and knives as the sole trophy of his enterprise.

On the arrival of the Company's ship in the spring however, York

Factory was re-built stronger and on a larger scale than before.

Iberville at this time finds great cause of complaint in the fact of

the French Company's poverty, and its inability to occupy the region

after it had been won for them. More than a single ship was required;

and a larger number of men in the vicinity of Fort Nelson would have

served to keep the English off perpetually.

In 1693 the Northern Company petitioned Pontchartrain, who had

succeeded Seignely at Court, respecting operations in the Bay. The

Company declared that it could hold everything if it were only enabled

to seize Fort Nelson; but that continued hostilities and losses had so

weakened it as to oblige it to have recourse to his Excellency to

obtain sufficient force in a suitable time to drive out the English.

In another petition it is alleged that this "single fort which remains

in the possession of the English is of so much importance that the

gain or loss of everything in Hudson's Bay depends upon it. The

Company's establishment in Quebec, to carry on this commerce, claims

anew the protection of your Excellency, that you may give it a

sufficient force to enable it to become master of Fort Nelson, which

the English took by an act of treason against this Company in time of

peace. This they hope from the strong desire which you have for the

aggrandizement of the kingdom, and from your affection for this

colony."

Iberville crossed over to France, and met with a warm reception at

Versailles. He unfolded his plans for the capture of Fort Nelson,

stated what force he would require for this desirable purpose, and was

promised two ships in the following spring.[25] Highly gratified with

his success, he departed for home in the _Envieux_.

[Sidenote: The English regain Fort Albany.]

The Hudson's Bay Company now made another effort to regain its fort at

Albany. Three powerfully armed ships wintered at Fort Nelson and

sailed thither in the spring of 1693.[26] From all accounts that had

been received, it was not believed that the rival French Company was

in a position to maintain a very strong force for an all-winter

defence, especially since the alienation of Iberville. Forty men were

landed, and approaching the post were met by a brisk fire, which

failed to check the English advance. Much to their own astonishment,

they were permitted to close upon the fort without check, and a ruse

was suspected. A cautious entrance was therefore made: the premises

were found apparently deserted. But at length, in a corner of the

cellar, emaciated and covered with rags, a human being a victim to

scurvy was discovered. His arms and legs were fastened together, and a

heavy chain kept him close to the wall. While they were marvelling at

this discovery, some of the sailors came to inform the captain that

three Frenchmen had been seen at a distance flying as fast as their

legs would carry them. Captain Grimington was not long left in doubt

as to the facts: these three Frenchmen had formed the garrison of the

fort St Anne. The unlucky wretch they now beheld was a bushranger who,

in a paroxysm of rage, had murdered the surgeon at the fort.

Horrified, on recovering his reason, at what he had done, and fearing

that the only witness of the deed, Father Dalmas, would betray him to

the rest, he slew the priest also. The latter, with his expiring

breath, disclosed his murderer, and the French, then ten in number,

had chained the criminal in the cellar, not themselves relishing the

task of his summary execution.

Iberville did not leave Quebec until the tenth[27] of August, and

arrived at Fort Nelson, September 24th. Almost immediately he

disembarked with all his people, also with cannons, mortars and a

large quantity of ammunition. Batteries were thrown up about five

hundred yards from the palisades, and upon these guns were

mounted.[28] A bombardment now took place, lasting from the 25th of

September to the 14th of October, when the governor was forced to

surrender, owing to the danger of a conflagration as well as to the

loss of several of his best men. On this occasion young Henry

Kelsey[29] showed great bravery, and a report of his gallantry being

forwarded to the Company, he was presented with the sum of forty

pounds as a token of their appreciation. This youth was destined to be

long in the service of the Company, as first in command at Fort

Nelson.

[Illustration: LANDING OF IBERVILLE'S MEN AT PORT NELSON.

(_From an old print._)]

[Sidenote: Iberville takes Fort Nelson.]

Iberville accomplished his entry on the fifteenth of October. The

French standard was hoisted and the fort christened Bourbon, and it

being St. Theresa's Day, the river was given the name of that saint.

The enemy did not come out of this business unscathed; they having

lost several of their men, including a brother of Iberville.

Some of the English were kept prisoners, while others made their way

as best they could to New Severn and Albany. At the time of the

surrender, the fort was well furnished with merchandise and

provisions, and this circumstance induced the French to remain for the

winter, before returning to France.

On the 20th of the following July, Iberville departed for the straits

in his two vessels, the _Poli_ and _Salamandre_. He left sixty-seven

men under the command of La Forest. Martigny became lieutenant, and

Jérémie was appointed ensign, with the additional functions of

interpreter and "director of commerce."

La Forest and his men were not long to enjoy security of trade and

occupation however. A meeting of the Hudson's Bay Company was held the

moment these outrages were reported. The King was besought to send a

fleet of four ships to the rescue and recapture of Fort Nelson. But it

was too late to sail that year. News of the proposed despatch of an

English fleet having reached France, Serigny was sent in June, 1696,

with two of the best craft procurable at Rochelle. Sailing three days

before the English, the two French ships arrived two hours too late.

It was instantly perceived that they were no match for the English,

and accordingly they discreetly withdrew. As the Company's vessels

occupied the mouth of the river, there was no safe landing place at

hand. Both ships set sail again for France; but one, the _Hardi_, was

destined never to reach her destination. She probably ran against ice

at the mouth of the straits and went to the bottom with all on board.

[Sidenote: Fort Nelson surrenders to the English fleet.]

The English commenced the attack on the fort August 29th. On the

following day it was decided to land, and the French, seeing the

strength of their force, had no alternative but surrender. Perchance

by way of retaliation for the affairs of Albany and New Severn, the

provisions of capitulation[30] were disregarded; all the French were

made prisoners and carried to England. Possession was taken of a vast

quantity of furs, and the English returned, well satisfied with their

exploit; but not ignorant of the difficulties which surrounded the

maintenance of such a conquest.

FOOTNOTES:

[23] It has been truly observed that the protracted and bloody contest

between the French and English for the possession of the Bay was the

result of a desire of the Governor to have access to those waters, and

the resolve of the latter to defeat this purpose. "The truth is," says

Mr. Lindsay, "the fur trade was only profitable when carried on by

water." At Quebec or Three Rivers forty beaver skins made a canoe

load. A single canoe load of northern furs was worth six of the

southern.

[24] Charlevoix.

[25] Although by this action the French Court directly participated in

and lent its support to the hostilities against the English, yet to

all intents and purposes the war was between two commercial

corporations.

The ruling spirits of the Northern Company were not unaware of the

importance and power of the enemy they had to deal with. In a pamphlet

published in France in 1692 there is amusing testimony to the

consideration in which the London Company was held by the French.

"It is composed," says this authority, "of opulent merchants and

noblemen of the first quality; and it is known that the King himself

is part proprietor, having succeeded to that emolument with the other

belongings to King James II. So great are its profits that each member

is worth at least £5,000 English sterling above what he was before he

embarked in the fur traffic. There can be no secrecy about its

intention, which is to subvert and subjugate the whole northern

Country to its sway."

[26] The expedition which thus wrested away from the French all the

forts at the bottom of the Bay was in charge of Captain Grimington, an

experienced naval officer, who had seen service in the late wars.

I have not been able to ascertain Grimington's fate, but in the

Company's minute-book, under date of 19th of May, 1714, I find the

following entry:--

"Mrs. Ann Grimington, widow of Captain Michael Grimington, deceased,

having delivered in her petition to the Company, the same was read,

and considering her poverty and the faithful services her husband

performed for the Company, the Committee agreed to allow the said Mrs.

Grimington twelve shillings per month for her subsistence, which the

secretary is ordered to pay her every first Monday in the month, to

commence the first Monday in June next. Interim, the secretary is

ordered to pay her twenty shillings as charity, which is afterwards to

be taken out of the poor-box." This is sufficiently strong evidence of

the state into which the Company had fallen.

[27] To illustrate the divergence of authorities in such matters, I

may mention that while Jérémie, who took part in this expedition,

calls the two ships the _Poli_ and _Charente_, in which he is followed

by Abbé Ferland. Father Marest, the aumonier of the crew, refers to

the second ship as the _Salamandre_. His relation is entitled "Le

Voyage du _Poli_ et _Salamandre_." In the letter of Frontenac to the

French minister (November 5, 1694) it is stated that Serigny commanded

the _Salamandre_. _La Potherie_ observes that the ships sent out in

1694 were the _Poli_ and _Salamandre_. Furthermore, he declares, they

sailed the 8th of August; Frontenac states the 9th, and Jérémie the

10th (_Jour de St. Laurent_). _La Potherie_ and Jérémie agree on the

date of their arrival, September 24th, although Ferland says it was

the 20th.

[28] Jérémie gives us a detailed description of the fort in his

"Relation." He says it was composed of four bastions, which formed a

square of thirty feet, with a large stone house above and below. In

one of these bastions was the storeroom for furs and merchandise,

another served for provisions; a third was used by the garrison. All

were built of wood. In a line with the first palisade there were two

other bastions, in one of which lodged the officers, the other serving

as a kitchen and forge. Between these two bastions was a

crescent-shaped earthworks sheltering eight cannon, firing eight-pound

balls, and defending the side of the fort towards the river. At the

foot of this earthworks was a platform, fortified by six pieces of

large cannon. There was no butt-range looking out upon the wood, which

was a weak point; all the cannon and swivel-guns were on the bastions.

In all, the armament consisted of thirty-two cannon and fourteen

swivel-guns outside the fort and fifty-three inside; on the whole,

calculated to make a stalwart defence.

[29] Kelsey was the earliest English explorer in the North-West.

Mention of his achievements will be found in the course of Chapter XV.

[30] Allen sent home to his superiors a copy of the capitulation

proposals of the French Commandant. This document is not without

interest. It is headed:--

CAPITULATION OF FORT YORK, 1696.

Articles of capitulation between William Allen,

Commandant-in-Chief at Hays, or St. Therese River, and Sieur G.

de la Forest, Commandant at Fort York or Bourbon, August 31,

1696.

I consent to give up to you my fort on the following

conditions:--

1. That I and all my men, French as well as Indians, and my

English servant, shall have our lives and liberty granted to

us, and that no wrong or violence shall be exercised upon us or

whatever belongs to us.

2. We shall march out of the fort without arms, to the beat of

the drum, match lighted, ball in mouth, flags unfurled, and

carry with us the two cannon which we brought from France.

3. We shall be transported altogether, in our own vessel, to

Plaisance, a French Port in New Newfoundland. We do not wish to

give up the fort till we have embarked, and we shall keep the

French flag over the fort till we march out.

4. If we meet with our vessels there shall be a truce between

us, and it shall be permitted to transport us with whatever

belongs to us.

5. We shall take with us all the beaver skins and other

merchandise obtained in trade this year, which shall be

embarked with us upon our vessels.

6. All my men shall embark their clothes and whatever belongs

to them without being subject to visitation, or robbed of

anything.

7. In case of sickness during the voyage, you shall furnish us

with all the remedies and medicines which we may require.

8. The two Frenchmen, who ought to return with the Indians,

shall be received in the fort on their return, where they shall

be treated the same as the English, and sent to Europe during

the same year, or they shall be furnished with everything

necessary to take them to Rochelle.

We shall have the full exercise of our religion, and the Jesuit

priest, our missionary, shall publicly perform the functions of

his ministry.

The Great Company · 第 13 / 36 章