[footnote] *From the observations hitherto collected, it appears that the

maximum of intensity for the whole surface of the Earth is 2.052, and the

minimum 0.706. Both phenomena occur in the southern hemisphere; the former

in 73 degrees 47' S. lat., and 169 degrees 30'E. long. from Paris, near

Mount Crozier, west-northwest of the south magnetic pole, at a place where

Captain James Ross found the inclination of the needle to be 87 degrees 11'

(Sabine, 'Contributions to Terrestrial Magnetism', 1843, No. 5, p. 231); the

latter, observed by Erman at 19 degrees 59' S. lat., and 37 degrees 24' W.

long. from Paris, 320 miles eastward from the Brazilian coast of Espiritu

Santo (Erman, 'Phys. Beob.', 1841, s. 570), at a point where the inclination

is only 7 degrees 55'. The actual ratio of the two intensities is therefore

as 1 to 2.906. It was long believed that the greatest intensity of the

magnetic force was only two and a half times as great as the weakest

exhibited on the Earth's surface. (Sabine, 'Report on Magnetic Intensity',

p. 82.)

If the intensity near the magnetic south pole

p 188

be expressed by 2.052 (the unit still employed being the intensity which I

discovered on the magnetic equator in Northern Peru), Sabine found it was

only 1.624 at the magnetic north pole near Melville Island (70 degrees 27'

north lat.), while it is 1.803 at New York, in the United States, which has

almost the same latitude as Naples.

The brilliant discoveries of Oersted, Arago, and Faraday have established a

more intimate connection between the electric tension of the atmosphere and

the magnetic tension of our terrestrial globe. While Oestred has discovered

that electricity excites magnetism in the neighborhood of the conducting

body, Faraday's experiments have elicited electric currents from the

liberated magnetism. Magnetism is one of the manifold forms under which

electricity reveals itself. The ancient vague presentiment of the identity

of electric and magnetic attraction has been verified in our own times.

"When electrum (amber)," says Pliny, in the spirit of the Ionic natural

philosophy of Thales,* is 'animated' by friction and heat, it will attract

bark and dry leaves precisely as the loadstone attracts iron."

[footnote] *Of amber (succinum, glessum) Pliny observes (xxxvii., 3),

"Genera ejus plura. Attritu digitorum accepta caloris anima trahunt in se

paleas ac folia arida quae levia sunt, ac ut magnes lapis ferri ramenta

quoque." (Plato, 'in Timaeo', p. 80. Martin, 'Etude sur le Timee', t. ii.,

p. 343-346. Strabo, xv., p. 703, Casaub,; Clemens Alex., 'Strom.', ii., p.

370, where, singularly enough, a difference is made between [Greek words])

When Thales, in Aristot., 'de Anima', 1, 2, and Hippias, in Diog. Laert.,

i., 24, describe the magnet and amber as possessing a soul, they refer only

to a moving principle.

The same words may be found in the literature of an Asiatic nation, and

occur in a eulogium on the loadstone by the Chinese physicist Kuopho.*

[footnote] *"The magnet attracts iron as amber does the smallest grain of

mustard seed. It is like a breath of wind which mysteriously penetrates

through both, and communicates itself with the rapidity of an arrow." These

are the words of Kuopho, a Chinese panegyrist on the magnet, who wrote in

the beginning of the fourth century. (Klaproth, 'Lettre a M. A. de Humboldt,

sur l'Invention de la Boussole', 1834, p. 125.)

I observed with astonishment,

p 189

on the woody banks of the Orinoco, in the sports of the natives, that the

excitement of electricity by friction was known to these savage races, who

occupy the very lowest place in the scale of humanity. Children may be seen

to rub the dry, flat, and shining seeds or husks of a trailing plant

(probably a 'Negretia') until they are able to attract threads of cotton and

pieces of bamboo cane. That which thus delights the naked copper-colored

Indian is calculated to awaken in our minds a deep and earnest impression.

What a chasm divides the electric pastime of these savages from the

discovery of a metallic conductor discharging its electric shocks, or a pile

composed of many chemically-decomposing substances, or a light-engendering

magnetic apparatus! In such a chasm lie buried thousands of years that

compost the history of the intellectual development of mankind!

The incessant change or oscillatory motion which we discover in all magnetic

phenomena, whether in those of the inclincation, declination, and intensity

of these forces, according to the hours of the day and the night, and the

seasons and the course of the whole year, leads us to conjecture the

existence of very various and partial systems of electric currents on the

surface of the Earth. Are these currents, as in Seebeck's experiments,

thermo-magnetic, and excited directly from unequal distribution of heat? or

should we not rather regard them as induced by the position of the Sun and

by solar heat?*

[footnote] *"The phenomena of periodical variations depend manifestly on

the action of solar heat, operating probably through the medium of

thermo-electric currents induced on the Earth's surface. Beyond this rude

guess, however, nothing is as yet known of their physical cause. It is even

still a matter of speculation whether the solar influence be a principal or

only a subordinate cause in the phenomena of terrestrial magnetism."

('Observations to be made in the Antarctic Expedition', 1840, p. 35.)

Have the rotation of the planets, and the different degrees of velocity

which the individual zones acquire, according to their respective distances

from the equator, any influence on the distribution of magnetism? Must we

seek the seat of these currents, that is to say, of the disturbed

electricity, in the atmosphere, in the regions of planetary space, or in the

polarity of the Sun and Moon? Galileo, in his celebrated 'Dialogo', was

inclined to ascribe the parallel direction of the axis of the Earth to a

magnetic point of attraction seated in universal space.

If we represent to ourselves the interior of the Earth as fused and

undergoing an enormous pressure, and at a degree of temperature the amount

of which we are unable to assign,

p 190

we must renounce all idea of a magnetic nucleus of the Earth. All magnetism

is certainly not lost until we arrive at a white heat,* and it is manifested

when iron is at a dark red heat, however different, therefore, the

modifications may be which are excited in substances in their molecular

state, and in the coercive force depending upon that condition in

experiments of this nature, there will still remain a considerable thickness

of the terrestrial stratum, which might be assumed to be the seat of

magnetic currents.

[footnote] *Barlow, in the 'Philos. Trans.' for 1822, Pt. i., p. 117; Sir

David Brewster, 'Treatise on Magnetism', p. 129. Long before the times of

Gilbert and Hooke, it was taught in the Chinese work 'Ow-thea-tsou' that

heat diminished the directive force of the magnetic needle. (Klaproth,

'Lettre a M. A. de Humboldt, sur l'Invention de la Boussole', p. 96.)

The old explanation of the horary variations of declination by the

progressive warming of the Earth in the apparent revolution of the Sun from

east to west must be limited to the uppermost surface, since thermometers

sunk into the Earth, which are now being accurately observed at so many

different places, show how slowly the solar heat penetrates even to the

inconsiderable depth of a few feet. Moreover, the thermic condition of the

surface of water, by which two thirds of our planet is covered, is not

favorable to such modes of explanation, when we have reference to an

immediate action and not to an effect of induction in the aërial and

aqueous investment of our terrestrial globe.

In the present condition of our knowledge, it is impossible to afford a

satisfactory reply to all questions regarding the ultimate physical causes

of these phenomena. It is only with reference to that which presents itself

in the triple manifestations of the terrestrial force, as a measurable

relation of space and time, and as a stable element in the midst of change,

that science has recently made such brilliant advances by the aid of the

determination of mean numerical values. From Toronto in Upper Canada to the

Cape of Good Hope and Van Diemen's Land, from Paris to Pekin, the Earth has

been covered, since 1828, with magnetic observatories,* in which every

regular

p 191

or irregular manifestation of the terrestrial force is detected by

uninterrupted and simultaneous observations. A variation

p 192

of 1/40000th of the magnetic intensity is measured, and at certain epochs,

observations are made at intervals of 2 1/2 minutes, and continued for

twenty-four hours consecutively.

[footnote] *As the first demand for the establishment of these

observatories (a net-work of stations, provided with similar instruments)

proceeded from me, I did not dare to cherish the hope that I should live

long enough to see the time when both hemispheres should be uniformly

covered with magnetic houses under the associated activity of able

physicists and astronomers. This has, however, been accomplished, and

chiefly through the liberal and continued support of the Russian and British

governments.

[footnote continues] In the years 1806 and 1807, I and my friend and

fellow-laborer, Herr Oltmanns, while at Berlin, observed the movements of

the needle, especially at the times of the solstices and equinoxes, from

hour to hour, and often from half hour to half hour, for five or six days

and nights uninterruptedly. I had persuaded myself that continuous and

uninterrupted observations of several days and nights (observatio perpetua)

were preferable to the single observations of many months. The apparatus, a

Prony's magnetic telescope, suspended in a glass case by a thread devoid of

torsion, allowed angles of seven or eight seconds to be read off on a

finely-divided scale, placed at a proper distance, and lighted at night by

lamps. Magnetic perturbations (storms), which occasionally recurred at the

same hour on several successive nights, led me even then to desire extremely

that similar apparatus should be used to the east and west of Berlin, in

order to distinguish general terrestrial phenomena from those which are mere

local disturbances, depending on the inequality of heat in different parts

of the Earth, or on the cloudiness of the atmosphere. My departure to

Paris, and the long period of political disturbance that involved the whole

of the west of Europe, prevented my wish from being then accomplished.

(OErsted's great discovery (1820) of the intimate connection between

electricity and magnetism again excited a general interest (which had long

flagged) in the periodical variations of the electro-magnetic tension of the

Earth. Arago, who many years previously had commenced in the Observatory at

Paris, with a new and excellent declination instrument by Gambey, the

longest uninterrupted series of horary observations which we possess in

Europe, showed by a comparison with simultaneous observations of

perturbation made at Kasan, what advantages might be obtained from

corresponding measurements of declination. When I returned to Berlin, after

an eighteen years' residence in France, I had a small magnetic house erected

in the autumn of 1828, not only with the view of carrying on the work

commenced in 1806, but more with the object that simultaneous observations

at hours previously determined might be made at Berlin, Paris, and Freiburg,

at a depth of 35 fathoms below the surface. The simultaneous occurrence of

the perturbations, and the parallelism of the movements for October and

December, 1829, were then graphically represented. (Pogg., 'Annalen', bd.

xix., s. 357, taf. i.-iii.) An expedition into Northern Asia, undertaken in

1829, by command of the Emperor of Russia, soon gave me an opportunity of

working out my plan on a larger scale. The plan was laid before a select

committee of one of the Imperial Academies of Science, and, under the

protection of the Director of the Mining Department, Count von Cancrin, and

the excellent superintendence of Professor Kupffer, magnetic stations were

appointed over the whole of Northern Asia, from Nicolajeff, in the line

through Catharinenburg, Barnaul, and Nertschinsk, to Pekin.

[footnote continues] The year 1832 ('Gottinger gelehrte Anzeigen', st. 206)

is distinguished as the great epoch in which the profound author of a

general theory of terrestrial magnetism, Friedrich Gauss, erected apparatus,

constructed on a new principle, in the Gottingen Observatory. The magnetic

observatory was finished in 1834, and in the same year Gauss distributed new

instruments, with instructions for their use, in which the celebrated

physicist, Wilhelm Weber, took extreme interest, over a large portion of

Germany and Sweden, and the whole of Italy. ('Resultate der Beob. des

Magnetischen Verceins in Jahr' 1338, s. 135, and Poggend., 'Annalen.' bd.

xxxiii., s. 426.) In the magnetic association that was now formed with

Gottingen for its center, simultaneous observations have been undertaken

four times a year since 1836, and continued uninterruptedly for twenty-four

hours. The periods, however, do not coincide with those of the equinoxes

and solstices, which I had proposed and followed out in 1830. Up to this

period, Great Britain, in possession of the most extensive commerce and the

largest navy in the world, had taken no part in the movement which since

1828 had begun to yield important results for the more fixed ground-work of

terrestrial magnetism. I had the good fortune, by a public appeal from

Berlin which I sent in April 1836, to the Duke of Sussex, at that time

President of the Royal Society (Lettre de M. de Humboldt a S. A. R. le Duc

de Sussex, sur les moyens propres a perfectionner la connaissance du

magnetisme terrestre par l'establissement des stations magnetiques et

d'observations correspondantes), to excite a friendly interest in the

undertaking which it had so long been the chief object of my wish to carry

out. In my letter to the Duke of Sussex I urged the establishment of

permanent stations in Canada, St. Helena, the Cape of Good Hope, the Isle of

France, Ceylon, and New Holland, which five years previously I had advanced

as good positions. The Royal Society appointed a joint physical and

meteorological committee, which not only proposed to the government the

establishment of fixed magnetic observatories in both hemispheres, but also

the equipment of a naval expedition for magnetic observations in the

Antarctic Seas. It is needless to proclaim the obligations of science to

the great activity of Sir John Herschel, Sabine, Airy, and Lloyd, as well as

the powerful support that was afforded by the British Association for the

Advancement of Science at their meeting held at Newcastle in 1838. In June,

1839, the Antarctic magnetic expedition, under the command of Captain James

Clark Ross, was fully arranged; and now, since its successful return, we

reap the double fruits of the highly important geographical discoveries

around the south pole, and a series of simultaneous observations at eight or

ten magnetic stations.

A great English astronomer and physicist has calculated* that the mass of

observations which are in progress will accumulate in the course of three

years to 1,958,000.

[footnote] *See the article on 'Terrestrial Magnetism', in the 'Quarterly

Review' 1840, vol. lxvi., p. 271-312.

Never before has so noble and cheerful a spirit presided over the inquiry

into the 'quantitative' relations of the laws of the phenomena of nature.

We are, therefore, justified in hoping that these laws, when compared with

those which govern the atmosphere and the remoter regions of space, may, by

degrees, lead us to a more intimate acquaintance with the genetic conditions

of magnetic phenomena. As yet we can only boast of having opened a greater

number of paths which may possibly lead to an explanation of this subject.

In the physical science of terrestrial

p 193

magnetism, which must not be confounded with the purely mathematical branch

of the study, those persons only will obtain perfect satisfaction who, as in

the science of the meteorological processes of the atmosphere conveniently

turn aside the practical bearing of all phenomena that can not be explained

according to their own views.

Terrestrial magnetism, and the electro-dynamic forces computed by the

intellectual Ampere,* stand in simultaneous and intimate connection with the

terrestrial or polar light, as well as with the internal and external heat

of our planet, whose magnetic poles may be considered as the poles of cold.**

[footnote] *Instead of ascribing the internal heat of the Earth to the

transition of matter from a vapor-like fluid to a solid condition, which

accompanies the formation of the planets, Ampere has propounded the idea,

which I regard as highly improbable, that the Earth's temperature may be the

consequence of the continuous chemical action of a nucleus of the metals of

the earths and alkalies on the oxydizing external crust. "It can not be

doubted," he observes in his masterly 'Theorie des Phenomenes

Electro-dynamiques', 1826, p. 199, "that electro-magnetic currents exist in

the interior of the globe, and that these currents are the cause of its

temperature. They arise from the action of a central metallic nucleus,

composed of the metals discovered by Sir Humphrey Davy, acting on the

surrounding oxydized layer."

[footnote] **The remarkable connection between the curvature of the

magnetic lines and that of my isothermal lines was first detected by Sir

David Brewster. See the 'Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh',

vol. ix., 1821, p. 318, and 'Treatise on Magnetism', 1837, p. 42, 44, 47,

and 268. This distinguished physicist admist two cold poles (poles of

maximum cold) in the northern hemisphere, an American one near Cape Walker

(73 degrees lat., 100 degrees W. long.), and an Asiatic one (73 degrees

lat., 80 degrees E. long.); whence arise, according to him, two hot and two

cold meridians, i.e., meridians of greatest heat and cold. Even in the

sixteenth century, Acosts ('Historia Natural de las Indias', 1589, lib. i.,

cap. 17), grounding his opinion on the observations of a very experienced

Portuguese pilot, taught that there were four lines without declination. It

would seem from the controversy of Henry Bond (the author of 'The Longitude

Found', 1676) with Beckborrow, that this view in some measure influenced

Halley in his theory of four magnetic poles. See my 'Examen Critique de

l'Hist. de la Geographie', t. iii., p. 60.

The bold conjecture hazarded one hundred and twenty-eight years since by

Halley,* that the Aurora Borealis was a magnetic phenomenon, has acquired

empirical certainty from Faraday's brilliant discovery of the evolution of

light by magnetic forces.

[footnote] *Halley, in the 'Philosophical Transactions', vol. xxix. (for

1714-1716), No. 341.

The northern light is preceded by premonitory signs. Thus, in the morning

before the occurrence of the phenomenon, the irregular horary course of the

magnetic needle generally indicates a disturbance of the equilibrium in the

distribution of

p 194

terrestrial magnetism.*

[footnote] *[The Aurora Borealis of October 24th, 1847, which was one of

the most brilliant ever known in this country, was preceded by great

magnetic disturbance. On the 22d of October the maximum of the west

declination was 23 degrees 10'; on the 23d the position of the magnet was

continually changing, and the extreme west declinations were between 22

degrees 44' and 23 degrees 37';on the night between the 23d and 24th of

October, the changes of position were very large and very frequent, the

magnet at times moving across the field so rapidly that a difficulty was

experienced in following it. During the day of the 24th of October there

was a constant change of position, but after midnight, when the Aurora began

perceptibly to decline in brightness, the disturbance entirely ceased. The

changes of position of the horizontal-force magnet were as large and as

frequent as those of the declination magnet, but the vertical-force magnet

was at no time so much affected as the other two instruments. See 'On the

Aurora Borealis, as it was seen on Sunday evening, October 24th, 1847, at

Blackheath,' by James Glaisher, Esq., of the Royal Observatory, Greenwich,

in the 'London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philos. Mag and Journal of Science for

Nov.', 1847, by John H. Morgan, Esq. We must not omit to mention that

magnetic disturbance is now registered by a 'photographic' process: the

self-registering photographic apparatus used for this purpose in the

Observatory at Greenwich was designed by Mr. Brooke, and another ingenious

instrument of this kind has been invented by Mr. F. Ronalds, of the Richmond

Observatory.] -- Tr.

When this disturbance attains a great degree of intensity, the equilibrium

of the distribution is restored by a discharge attended by a development of

light "The Aurora* itself is, therefore, not to be regarded as an externally

manifested cause of this disturbance, but rather as a result of telluric

activity, manifested on the one side by the appearance of the light, and on

the other by the vibrations of the magnetic needle."

[footnote] *Dove, in Poggend., 'Annalen', bd. xx., s. 341; bd. xix., s.

388. "The declination needle acts in very nearly the same way as an

atmospheric electrometer, whose divergence in like manner shows the

increased tension of the electricity before this has become so great as to

yield a spark." See also, the excellent observations of Professor Käwmtz,

in his 'Lehrbuch der Meteorologie', bd. iii., s. 511-519, and Sir David

Brewster, in his 'Treatise on Magnetism', p. 280. Regarding the magnetic

properties of the galvanic flame, or luminous arch from a Bunsen's carbon

and zinc battery, see Casselmann's 'Beobachtungen' (Marburg, 1844), s. 56-62.

The splendid appearance of colored polar light is the act of discharge, the

termination of a magnetic storm, as in an electrical storm a development of

light -- the flash of lightning -- indicates the restoration of the

disturbed equilibrium in the distribution of the electricity. An electric

storm is generally confined to a small space beyond the limits of which the

condition of the atmospheric electricity remains unchanged. A magnetic

storm, on the other hand,

p 193

shows its influence on the course of the needle over large portions of

continents, and, as Arago first discovered far from the spot where the

evolution of light was visible. It is not improbable that, as

heavily-charged threatening clouds, owing to frequent transitions of the

atmospheric electricity to an opposite condition, are not always discharged,

accompanied by lightning, so likewise magnetic storms may occasion

far-extending disturbances in the horary course of the needle, without there

being any positive necessity that the equilibrium of the distribution should

be restored by explosion, or by the passage of luminous effusions from one

of the poles to the equator, or from pole to pole.

In collecting all the individual features of the phenomenon in one general

picture, we must not omit to describe the origin and course of a perfectly

developed Aurora Borealis. Low down in the distant horizon, about the part

of the heavens which is intersected by the magnetic meridian, the sky which

was previously clear is at once overcast. A dense wall of bank of cloud

seems to rise gradually higher and higher, until it attains an elevation of

8 or 10 degrees. The color of the dark segment passes into brown or

violet; and stars are visible through the cloudy stratum, as when a dense

smoke darkens the sky. A broad, brightly-luminous arch, first white, then

yellow, encircles the dark segment; but as the brilliant arch appears

subsequently to the smoky gray segment, we can not agree with Argelander in

ascribing the latter to the effect of mere contrast with the bright luminous

margin.*

[footnote] *Argelander, in the important observations on the northern light

embodied in the 'Vorträgen gehalten in der physikalish-okonomischen

Gessellschaft zu Konigsberg', bd. i., 1834, s. 257-264.

The highest point of the arch of light is, according to accurate

observations made on the subject,* not generally in the magnetic meridian

itself, but from 5 degrees to 18 degrees toward the direction of the

magnetic declination of the place.**

Cosmos: A Sketch of the Physical Description of the Universe, Vol. 1 · 第 22 / 45 段