GERARD OF HAARLEM

The influence of these painters and Dierick Bouts is seen in the rare

works of Geertgen tot S. Jans, or Gerard of Haarlem (1465-1493) whose

_Raising of Lazarus_ (No. 2563A) in this collection is an achievement

of the highest order, and was purchased as recently as 1902 for £4000

from Baron d’Albenas, after having been for many years in Spain. This

pupil or follower of the Ouwater master was a native of Leyden, and

worked at Haarlem. He took his name from the commandery of the Knights

of St. John at Haarlem for whom he worked, as we see from the careful

inscription, “_Gerardus Leydanus pictor ad S. Io. Baptist. Harlem

pinxt_,” on his triptych at Vienna.

Among his contemporaries were Cornelis Engelbrechtsen, who was born

in 1468 at Leyden, where he died in 1533, and Lucas van Leyden

(1494-1533). The latter played an important part as an engraver quite

as much as a painter in the university town of Leyden, which now

possesses his large _Last Judgment_ and became famous as the birthplace

of Rembrandt in 1606. The Louvre possesses no picture by either

Engelbrechtsen or Lucas van Leyden.

Jacob Cornelisz van Oostsanen (fl. 1470-1533) is also unrepresented

here. Portraits by painters in this group are often confused, as in

the case of the _Portrait of the Duke of East Friesland_, in the

Oldenburg Gallery, which has been attributed to both Lucas van Leyden

and Jacob Cornelisz. A pupil of the latter may have painted the _Cana

of Galilee_ (No. 2640C). It is safe to assign to “the Master of the

Female Half Figures,” the _Young Lady Reading_ (No. 2641C), which has

a close analogy with the well-known picture in the Harrach collection

at Vienna, representing half-length figures of three young ladies in

crimson velvet dresses cut square at the neck, and singing to the

accompaniment of a flute and a lute. The name of this painter is

not known, but his pictures, which are neither numerous nor of any

conspicuous merit, are easily recognisable.

To this period of transition and mediocre painting belongs Jan Scorel

(1495-1562), whose _Portrait of Paracelsus the Doctor_ (No. 2567A) is

inscribed:

“FORMOSO DOCTOR PARASELSUS,”

and is in every way superior to the _Portrait of a Man_ (No. 2641B),

which is labelled with the name of Scorel, but catalogued as being by

an unknown artist. From Scorel, a much travelled Dutch artist, who at

one time worked at Nuremburg with Albrecht Dürer and visited Venice

and the East, we naturally pass to Jan Mostaert of Haarlem. Mostaert

of Haarlem is unrepresented at the Louvre, a remark which equally well

applies to the anonymous “Pseudo-Mostaert,” who painted so much in his

style that a large number of inferior productions have been credited to

him from time to time. Pictures of this type vary so considerably that

the name “Pseudo-Mostaert” is little more than a generic designation

for unassignable Flemish and Dutch pictures of the middle of the

sixteenth century; such pictures bear some relationship to the _Christ

bearing His Cross_ (No. 2299), and the _Abraham’s Sacrifice_ (No.

2300), officially attributed to the little-known and quite negligible

painter Alart Claeszoon (1498-1564) of Leyden.

The Louvre: Fifty Plates in Colour · 第 220 / 399 题