XVII. NATIVES

Up to this time, save for a few Masai at the very beginning of our trip,

we had seen no natives at all. Only lately, the night of the lion dance,

one of the Wanderobo-the forest hunters-had drifted in to tell us of

buffalo and to get some meat. He was a simple soul, small and capable,

of a beautiful red-brown, with his hair done up in a tight, short queue.

He wore three skewers about six inches long thrust through each of his

ears, three strings of blue beads on his neck, a bracelet tight around

his upper arm, a bangle around his ankle, a pair of rawhide sandals, and

about a half yard of cotton cloth which he hung from one shoulder.

As weapons he carried a round-headed, heavy club, or runga, and a

long-bladed spear. He led us to buffalo, accepted a thirty-three cent

blanket, and made fire with two sticks in about thirty seconds. The only

other evidences of human life we had come across were a few beehives

suspended in the trees. These were logs, bored hollow and stopped at

either end. Some of them were very quaintly carved. They hung in the

trees like strange fruits.

Now, however, after leaving the Isiola, we were to quit the game country

and for days travel among the swarming millions of the jungle.

A few preliminary and entirely random observations may be permitted me

by way of clearing the ground for a conception of these people. These

observations do not pretend to be ethnological, nor even common logical.

The first thing for an American to realize is that our own negro

population came mainly from the West Coast, and differed utterly from

these peoples of the highlands in the East. Therefore one must first of

all get rid of the mental image of our own negro “dressed up” in savage

garb. Many of these tribes are not negro at all-the Somalis, the Nandi,

and the Masai, for example-while others belong to the negroid and

Nilotic races. Their colour is general cast more on the red-bronze than

the black, though the Kavirondos and some others are black enough. The

texture of their skin is very satiny and wonderful. This perfection is

probably due to the constant anointing of the body with oils of various

sorts. As a usual thing they are a fine lot physically. The southern

Masai will average between six and seven feet in height, and are almost

invariably well built. Of most tribes the physical development is

remarkably strong and graceful; and a great many of the women will

display a rounded, firm, high-breasted physique in marked contrast to

the blacks of the lowlands. Of the different tribes possibly the Kikuyus

are apt to count the most weakly and spindly examples: though some of

these people, perhaps a majority, are well made.

Furthermore, the native differentiates himself still further in

impression from our negro in his carriage and the mental attitude that

lies behind it. Our people are trying to pattern themselves on white

men, and succeed in giving a more or less shambling imitation thereof.

The native has standards, ideas, and ideals that perfectly satisfy him,

and that antedated the white man's coming by thousands of years. The

consciousness of this reflects itself in his outward bearing. He does

not shuffle; he is not either obsequious or impudent. Even when he

acknowledges the white man's divinity and pays it appropriate respect,

he does not lose the poise of his own well-worked-out attitude toward

life and toward himself.

We are fond of calling these people primitive. In the world's standard

of measurement they are primitive, very primitive indeed. But ordinarily

by that term, we mean also undeveloped, embryonic. In that sense we are

wrong. Instead of being at the very dawn of human development, these

people are at the end-as far as they themselves are concerned. The

original racial impulse that started them down the years toward

development has fulfilled its duty and spent its force. They have worked

out all their problems, established all their customs, arranged the

world and its phenomena in a philosophy to their complete satisfaction.

They have lived, ethnologists tell us, for thousands, perhaps hundreds

of thousands of years, just as we find them to-day. From our standpoint

that is in a hopeless intellectual darkness, for they know absolutely

nothing of the most elementary subjects of knowledge. From their

standpoint, however, they have reached the highest DESIRABLE pinnacle

of human development. Nothing remains to be changed. Their customs,

religions, and duties have been worked out and immutably established

long ago; and nobody dreams of questioning either their wisdom or their

imperative necessity. They are the conservatives of the world.

Nor must we conclude-looking at them with the eyes of our own

civilization-that the savage is, from his standpoint, lazy and idle.

His life is laid out more rigidly than ours will be for a great many

thousands of years. From childhood to old age he performs his every act

in accord with prohibitions and requirements. He must remember them all;

for ignorance does not divert consequences. He must observe them all; in

pain of terrible punishments. For example, never may he cultivate on

the site of a grave; and the plants that spring up from it must never

be cut.* He must make certain complicated offerings before venturing to

harvest a crop. On crossing the first stream of a journey he must touch

his lips with the end of his wetted bow, wade across, drop a stone on

the far side, and then drink. If he cuts his nails, he must throw the

parings into a thicket. If he drink from a stream, and also cross it,

he must eject a mouthful of water back into the stream. He must be

particularly careful not to look his mother-in-law in the face. Hundreds

of omens by the manner of their happening may modify actions, as, on

what side of the road a woodpecker calls, or in which direction a hyena

or jackal crosses the path, how the ground hornbill flies or alights,

and the like. He must notice these things, and change his plans

according to their occurrence. If he does not notice them, they exercise

their influence just the same. This does not encourage a distrait

mental attitude. Also it goes far to explain otherwise unexplainable

visitations. Truly, as Hobley says in his unexcelled work on the

A-Kamba, “the life of a savage native is a complex matter, and he is

hedged round by all sorts of rules and prohibitions, the infringement

of which will probably cause his death, if only by the intense belief he

has in the rules which guide his life.”

* Customs are not universal among the different tribes. I am

merely illustrating.

For these rules and customs he never attempts to give a reason. They

are; and that is all there is to it. A mere statement: “This is the

custom” settles the matter finally. There is no necessity, nor passing

thought even, of finding any logical cause. The matter was worked out

in the mental evolution of remote ancestors. At that time, perhaps,

insurgent and Standpatter, Conservative and Radical fought out the

questions of the day, and the Muckrakers swung by their tails and

chattered about it. Those days are all long since over. The questions

of the world are settled forever. The people have passed through the

struggles of their formative period to the ultimate highest perfection

of adjustment to material and spiritual environment of which they were

capable under the influence of their original racial force.

Parenthetically, it is now a question whether or not an added impulse

can be communicated from without. Such an impulse must (a) unsettle all

the old beliefs, (b) inspire an era of skepticism, (c) reintroduce the

old struggle of ideas between the Insurgent and the Standpatter, and

Radical and the Conservative, (d) in the meantime furnish, from the

older civilization, materials, both in the thought-world and in the

object-world, for building slowly a new set of customs more closely

approximating those we are building for ourselves. This is a longer

and slower and more complicated affair than teaching the native to wear

clothes and sing hymns; or to build houses and drink gin; but it is what

must be accomplished step by step before the African peoples are really

civilized. I, personally, do not think it can be done.

Now having, a hundred thousand years or so ago, worked out the highest

good of the human race, according to them, what must they say to

themselves and what must their attitude be when the white man has come

and has unrolled his carpet of wonderful tricks? The dilemma is evident.

Either we, as black men, must admit that our hundred-thousand-year-old

ideas as to what constitutes the highest type of human relation to

environment is all wrong, or else we must evolve a new attitude toward

this new phenomena. It is human nature to do the latter. Therefore the

native has not abandoned his old gods; nor has he adopted a new. He

still believes firmly that his way is the best way of doing things, but

he acknowledges the Superman.

To the Superman, with all races, anything is possible. Only our Superman

is an idea, and ideal. The native has his Superman before him in the

actual flesh.

We will suppose that our own Superman has appeared among us,

accomplishing things that apparently contravene all our established

tenets of skill, of intellect, of possibility. It will be readily

acknowledged that such an individual would at first create some

astonishment. He wanders into a crowded hotel lobby, let us say,

evidently with the desire of going to the bar. Instead of pushing

laboriously through the crowd, he floats just above their heads, gets

his drink, and floats out again! That is levitation, and is probably

just as simple to him as striking a match is to you and me. After we

get thoroughly accustomed to him and his life, we are no longer vastly

astonished, though always interested, at the various manifestations

of his extraordinary powers. We go right along using the marvellous

wireless, aeroplanes, motor cars, constructive machinery, and the

like that make us confident-justly, of course-in that we are about the

smartest lot of people on earth. And if we see red, white, and blue

streamers of light crossing the zenith at noon, we do not manifest any

very profound amazement. “There's that confounded Superman again,” we

mutter, if we happen to be busy. “I wonder what stunt he's going to do

now!”

A consideration of the above beautiful fable may go a little way toward

explaining the supposed native stolidity in the face of the white man's

wonders. A few years ago some misguided person brought a balloon to

Nairobi. The balloon interested the white people a lot, but everybody

was chiefly occupied wondering what the natives would do when they saw

THAT! The natives did not do anything. They gathered in large numbers,

and most interestedly watched it go up, and then went home again. But

they were not stricken with wonder to any great extent. So also with

locomotives, motor cars, telephones, phonographs-any of our modern

ingenuities. The native is pleased and entertained, but not astonished.

“Stupid creature, no imagination,” say we, because our pride in showing

off is a wee bit hurt.

Why should he be astonished? His mental revolution took place when he

saw the first match struck. It is manifestly impossible for any one to

make fire instantaneously by rubbing one small stick. When for the first

time he saw it done, he was indeed vastly astounded. The immutable had

been changed. The law had been transcended. The impossible had been

accomplished. And then, as logical sequence, his mind completed the

syllogism. If the white man can do this impossibility, why not all the

rest? To defy the laws of nature by flying in the air or forcing great

masses of iron to transport one, is no more wonderful than to defy

them by striking a light. Since the white man can provedly do one, what

earthly reason exists why he should not do anything else that hits his

fancy? There is nothing to get astonished at.

This does not necessarily mean that the native looks on the white man

as a god. On the contrary, your African is very shrewd in the reading of

character. But indubitably white men possess great magic, uncertain in

its extent.

That is as far as I should care to go, without much deeper acquaintance,

into the attitude of the native mind toward the whites. A superficial

study of it, beyond the general principals I have enunciated, discloses

many strange contradictions. The native respects the white man's warlike

skill, he respects his physical prowess, he certainly acknowledges

tacitly his moral superiority in the right to command. In case of

dispute he likes the white man's adjudication; in case of illness the

man's medicine; in case of trouble the white man's sustaining hand. Yet

he almost never attempts to copy the white man's appearance or ways of

doing things. His own savage customs and habits he fulfils with as much

pride as ever in their eternal fitness. Once I was badgering Memba Sasa,

asking him whether he thought the white skin or the black skin the more

ornamental. “You are not white,” he retorted at last. “That,” pointing

to a leaf of my notebook, “is white. You are red. I do not like the

looks of red people.”

They call our speech the “snake language,” because of its hissing sound.

Once this is brought to your attention, indeed, you cannot help noticing

the superabundance of the sibilants.

A queer melange the pigeonholes of an African's brain must contain-fear

and respect, strongly mingled with clear estimate of intrinsic character

of individuals and a satisfaction with his own standards.

Nor, I think, do we realize sufficiently the actual fundamental

differences between the African and our peoples. Physically they must

be in many ways as different from our selves as though they actually

belonged to a different species. The Masai are a fine big race,

enduring, well developed and efficient. They live exclusively on cow's

milk mixed with blood; no meat, no fruit, no vegetables, no grain;

just that and nothing more. Obviously they must differ from us most

radically, or else all our dietetic theories are wrong. It is a

well-known fact that any native requires a triple dose of white man's

medicine. Furthermore a native's sensitiveness to pain is very much

less than the white man's. This is indubitable. For example, the Wakamba

file-or, rather, chip, by means of a small chisel-all their front

teeth down to needle points, When these happen to fall out, the warrior

substitutes an artificial tooth which he drives down into the socket.

If the savage got the same effects from such a performance that a white

man's dental system would arouse, even “savage stoicism” would hardly

do him much good. There is nothing to be gained by multiplying examples.

Every African traveller can recall a thousand.

Incidentally, and by the way, I want to add to the milk-and-blood joke

on dietetics another on the physical culturists. We are all familiar

with the wails over the loss of our toe nails. You know what I mean;

they run somewhat like this: shoes are the curse of civilization; if

we wear them much longer we shall not only lose the intended use of our

feet, but we shall lose our toe nails as well; the savage man, etc.,

etc., etc. Now I saw a great many of said savage men in Africa, and I

got much interested in their toe nails, because I soon found that our

own civilized “imprisoned” toe nails were very much better developed. In

fact, a large number of the free and untramelled savages have hardly any

toe nails at all! Whether this upsets a theory, nullifies a sentimental

protest, or merely stands as an exception, I should not dare guess. But

the fact is indubitable.

The Land of Footprints · 第 20 / 44 题