Traité des Simples of Ibn Al-Beithar, in Notices et Extraits des

Manuscrits de la Bibliothèque Nationale, vol. xxiii, p. 409; Paris,

1877.

Footnote 21:

De Mély, “Le traité des fleuves de Plutarche,” in Revue des Études

Grecques, vol. v (1892), p. 332.

Footnote 22:

Konrad von Megenberg, “Buch der Natur,” ed. by Dr. Franz Pfeiffer,

Stuttgart, 1861, p. 456.

Footnote 23:

Volmar, “Steinbuch,” ed. by Hans Lambel, Heilbronn, 1877, p. 24.

Footnote 24:

St. Hildegardæ, “Opera omnia,” in Pat. Lat., ed. J. P. Migne, vol.

cxcvii, col. 1260.

Footnote 25:

D’Herbelot, “Bibliothèque Orientale,” La Haye, 1778, p. 230.

Footnote 26:

Clouston, “A Group of Eastern Romances,” Glasgow, 1889.

Footnote 27:

“Nützliche Versuche und Bemerkungen aus dem Reich der Natur,”

Nürnberg, 1760; cited by Bolton.

Footnote 28:

Bolton, “Contributions of Alchemy to Numismatics,” New York, 1890, pp.

17, 18.

Footnote 29:

Ashmole, “Theatrum chemicum Brittanicum,” London, 1652, pp. 4–6.

Footnote 30:

Spencer and Gillen, “The Native Tribes of Central Australia,” London,

1899, pp. 525–529.

Footnote 31:

Rumphius, “D’Ambonische Rariteitskamer,” Amsterdam, 1741, p. 291.

Footnote 32:

Rumphius, “D’Ambonische Rariteitskamer,” Amsterdam, 1741, pp. 291,

292.

Footnote 33:

Vogt, “Die Indianer des oberen Paraná,” Mitteilungen d. Anthrop.

Gesellsch. in Wien, 1904, vol. xxxiv, pp. 206, 207.

Footnote 34:

Hovorka and Kronfeld, “Vergleichende Volksmedizin,” vol. 11, p. 900;

communication from Dr. Rudolf Pöch.

Footnote 35:

Benvenuto Cellini, “Due trattati, uno intorno alle otto principali

arti dell’oreficeria,” etc., Fiorenzi, Valente Panizzi & Marco Peri,

1568, fol. 10 recto.

Footnote 36:

Axel Garboe, “Kulturhistoriske Studier over Ædelstene, med særligt

Henblik paa det 17. Aarhundrede,” Kobenhavn og Kristiania, 1915, p.

225; citing a manuscript in the Royal Library at Copenhagen.

Footnote 37:

See Herbert E. Gregory, “Note on the Shape of Pebbles,” in The

American Journal of Science, vol. xxxix, pp. 300–304; March, 1915;

also for two succeeding paragraphs.

Footnote 38:

See Herbert E. Gregory, “Note on the Shape of Pebbles,” in The

American Journal of Science, vol. xxxix, pp. 303, 304; March, 1915.

Footnote 39:

W. G. Wood-Martin, “Traces of the Elder Faiths of Ireland,” London,

1902, vol. i, p. 329.

Footnote 40:

Ibid., 1902, vol. i, op. cit., p. 330.

Footnote 41:

Nona Lebour, “White Quartz Pebbles and their Archæological

Significance”; reprint from Transactions of the Dumfriesshire and

Galloway Natural History and Antiquarian Society, January 30, 1914, p.

11.

Footnote 42:

Ibid., pp. 13 and 14, citing Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries

of Scotland, 1860–1, vol. iv, pt. i, p. 219.

Footnote 43:

Ibid., p. 12, citing Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of

Scotland, 1860–1, vol. iv, pt. i, p. 219.

Footnote 44:

William Thomas and Kate Pavitt, “The Book of Talismans, Amulets and

Zodiacal Gems,” London, 1914, p. 52.

Footnote 45:

From letter of Mr. Neil M. Judd, Assistant in Archæology in the United

States National Museum, communicated by Dr. W. H. Holmes, Head Curator

of the Department of Anthropology in that institution.

Footnote 46:

Communicated by Dr. Charles C. Abbott.

Footnote 47:

Warren K. Moorehead, “The Red-Paint People of Maine,” pp. 42, 43.

Reprint from the _American Anthropologist_ (N. S.), vol. xv, No. 1,

January-March, 1913.

Footnote 48:

See the present writer’s “Gems and Precious Stones of North America,”

New York, 1892, p. 128.

Footnote 49:

See N. F. Moore, “Antient Mineralogy,” 2d ed., New York, 1859, p. 190.

Footnote 50:

George Frederick Kunz, “Gems, Jewelers’ Materials and Ornamental

Stones of California,” California State Mining Bureau, Bulletin No.

37, Sacramento, 1905, pp. 71–73.

Footnote 51:

Plinii, “Historia naturalis,” Lib. xxxvii, cap. 73.

Footnote 52:

Collection des auteurs Latin, ed. by M. Nazaire; vol. i, Lucain,

Silius Italicus, Claudien, text and French trans., Paris, 1850, pp.

737, 738.

Footnote 53:

Torsten Kolmodin, “Lapparne och deres Land; Skildringar och Studier,”

Pt. III, Stockholm, 1914, p. 14.

Footnote 54:

Nona Lebour, “White Quartz Pebbles and their Archæological

Significance”; reprint from Transactions of the Dumfriesshire and

Galloway Natural History and Antiquarian Society, January 30, 1914, p.

10.

Footnote 55:

W. G. Wood-Martin, “Traces of the Elder Faiths of Ireland,” London,

1902, vol. i, p. 331.

Footnote 56:

Finn Magnussen, “Forsog til Forklaring over nogle Steder af Osian”;

Det Skandinaviske Litteraturselskabs Skrifter, 1813, Pt. II, pp. 237,

251.

Footnote 57:

W. G. Wood-Martin, “Traces of the Elder Faiths of Ireland,” London,

1902, vol. i, p. 330.

Footnote 58:

Kunz, “Gems and Precious Stones of North America,” New York, 1890, pp.

206–210.

Footnote 59:

Basher, “Catlinite, Its Antiquity as a Material for Tobacco Pipes,”

Am. Nat., vol. xvii, p. 745, July, 1883.

Footnote 60:

Renel, “Les religions de la Gaule avant le Christianisme,” Paris,

1906, p. 387.

Footnote 61:

Wirt Sikes, “British Goblins; Welsh Folk-Lore, Fairy Myths, Legends

and Traditions,” London, 1880, p. 362.

Footnote 62:

Renel, “Les religions de la Gaule avant le Christianisme,” Paris,

1906, p. 369.

Footnote 63:

Ibid., 1906, p. 368.

Footnote 64:

Paul Sebillot, “The Worship of Stones in France,” trans. by Joseph D.

McGuire, _American Anthropologist_, Jan.-Mar., 1902, vol. iv, No. 1,

p. 98; citing Société des Antiquaires, vol. i, p. 429.

Footnote 65:

Martin, “Description of the Western Isles,” in Pinkerton’s “Voyages

and Travels,” vol. iii, pp. 646, 627.

Footnote 66:

Sir Edgar McCulloch, “Guernsey Folk Lore,” London, 1903, p. 150.

Footnote 67:

Ibid., p. 157; fig. on p. 156.

Footnote 68:

Kuhn, “Norddeutsche Sagen,” Leipzig, 1848, p. 69.

Footnote 69:

Hermann, “Die erratischen Blöcke im Regierungsbezirck Danzig,” Berlin,

1911, p. 41; in vol. ii, Pt. I, “Beiträge zur Naturdenkmalpflege,” ed.

by H. Conwentz.

Footnote 70:

Walsh, “Curiosities of Popular Customs,” Philadelphia, 1911, p. 325.

Footnote 71:

Armand Viré, “Pierres à gravures et Pierres à légendes dans le Lot et

le Tarn et Garonne”; in Compte Rendu of the Ninth Session of the

Congrès Préhistorique de France, Paris, 1914, p. 349.

Footnote 72:

Ibid., p. 350.

Footnote 73:

Dr. Walter Hough in “Handbook of American Indians north of Mexico,”

ed. by Frederick Webb Hodge, Smithsonian Inst.; Bur. of Am. Ethn.,

Bull. 30; Washington, 1910, Pt. 2, p. 194.

Footnote 74:

Wirt Sikes, “British Goblins: Welsh Folk-Lore, Fairy Myths, Legends

and Traditions,” London, 1880, p. 365.

Footnote 75:

Father Lambert, “Moeurs et Superstitions des Néo-Calédoniens,” Noumea,

1900, pp. 217, 218, 222, 292–304.

Footnote 76:

See Scott’s “Border Minstrelsy,” vol. iv, Pt. II, p. 645.

Footnote 77:

Lean’s Collectanea (by Vincent Stuckey Lean), vol. ii, Pt. I, Bristol,

1903, p. 476; see W. F. Wademan in Jour. Roy. Hist, and Arch. Assoc.

of Ireland, July, 1875.

Footnote 78:

Catalogue of the collection of pearls and precious stones formed by

Henry Philip Hope, Esq. Systematically arranged and described by B.

Hertz, London, 1830.

Footnote 79:

Op. cit., p. 106.

Footnote 80:

Op. cit., No. 66, p. 106.

Footnote 81:

Op. cit., No. 65, p. 106.

Footnote 82:

Valentini, “Museum Museorum, oder der Vollständige Schau-Bühne,”

Franckfurt am Mayn, 1713, Pt. II, p. 41; figured.

Footnote 83:

Ulyssis Aldrovandi, “Museum metallicum,” Bononiæ, 1648, p. 527;

figured on p. 528.

Footnote 84:

Valentini, “Museum Museorum,” p. 42; citing description by Major in

his “Tractatus de cancris et lapidibus petrifactis,” p. 64.

Footnote 85:

Ibid., p. 42; Pl. IX, fig. 3.

Footnote 86:

Ibid., p. 41; figured. From report in Miscellan. Acad. Germ. Cur.,

Decur. I, Ann. I, Obs. CXIII, p. 232.

Footnote 87:

Athanasii Kircheri, “Mundus subterraneus,” Amstelodami, 1665, vol. ii,

pp. 42 sqq.

Footnote 88:

Op. cit., vol. i, p. 39; Pl. IV, fig. 6.

Footnote 89:

Scribner & Co., 1886.

Footnote 90:

The Germans called it Aschenzieher.

Footnote 91:

Pliny, “Naturalia historia,” Lib. xxxvii, cap. 29. In his recently

published “Curious Lore of Precious Stones” the present writer

suggested that Pliny’s _lychnis_ might have been a spinel, but while

some of these “ardent stones” may have been spinels, those displaying

the phenomenon of attraction must have been tourmalines.

Footnote 92:

A. C. Hamlin.

Footnote 93:

Theophrasti, “De lapidibus, peri tôn lithôn,” ed. by John Hill,

London, 1746, pp. 71–73 (cap. xlvi).

Footnote 94:

Idem, pp. 68–71 (cap. xlvi); see also Hill’s note on p. 69.

Footnote 95:

Johannis de Laet, Antwerpii, “De gemmis et lapidibus, libri duo,”

Lugduni Batavorum [1647], pp. 36, 40.

Footnote 96:

“_Curiose Speculationes_ bey schlaflosen Nächten ... von einem

_L_iebhaber der _I_mmer _G_ern _S_peculirt,” Chemnitz und Leipzig, bey

Conr. Stosseln, 1707, 857, pp. 80.

Footnote 97:

Johann Gustav Donndorf, “Natur und Kunst,” Leipzig, 1790, p. 516.

Footnote 98:

“Histoire de l’Académie Royale des Sciences et Belles Lettres,” vol.

xii, 1756; Berlin, 1758, pp. 105–121.

Footnote 99:

See Historie de l’Académie Royale des Sciences Année mdcccxvii Paris,

1719, pp. 7, 8.

Footnote 100:

Abbé Haüy, “Trattato dei caratteri fisici delle pietre preziose,”

Ital. trans. by Luigi Configliachi, Milano, 1819, pp. 135–138; see

Plate II, fig. 49.

Footnote 101:

Aepinus, l. c.

Footnote 102:

The Complete Works of Benjamin Franklin, ed. by John Bigelow, New York

and London, 1888, vol. x, pp. 282–285.

Footnote 103:

See the writer’s “Gems and Precious Stones of North America,” New

York, 1890, Pl. 4, and also his “Precious Stones” in 20th Annual

Report of the U. S. Geological Survey, Pt. VI, Washington, 1899, p.

577.

Footnote 104:

Cornelii Taciti, “Libri qui supersunt,” vol. ii, Lipsiæ, 1885, p. 243.

Footnote 105:

Sat. vi, 572; ix, 50.

Footnote 106:

Lib. v, 37, 9; xi, 8, 6.

Footnote 107:

Pfizmeier, Sitzungsbericht d. phil.-hist. Kl., Wien, 1866, vol. xliii,

p. 195.

Footnote 108:

Plinii, “Naturalis historia,” Lib. xxxvii, cap. 12.

Footnote 109:

Lean’s Collectanea, vol. ii, Pt. II, Bristol, 1903, p. 640.

Footnote 110:

Waver. Especially interesting as all amber changes in time.

Footnote 111:

Plinii, “Naturalis historia,” Lib. xxxvii, cap. 11.

Footnote 112:

Plinii, “Naturalis historia,” Lib. xxxvii, cap. 12.

Footnote 113:

Severus Sammonicus, “Preceptes médicaux,” text and French trans. by L.

Baudet, Paris, 1845, pp. 84, 85.

Footnote 114:

King, “Natural History of Precious Stones,” etc., London, 1865, p.

334, note.

Footnote 115:

Raumer, “Historisches Taschenbuch,” I Ser., vol. vi, Leipzig, 1835, p.

366.

Footnote 116:

Pyle, “The Therapeusis of Precious Stones,” in his “Medicine,”

Detroit, 1897, vol. iii, p. 115.

Footnote 117:

Palladii, “De gentibus Indie,” ed. Bissæus, London, 1665, p. 4.

Footnote 118:

Martin, “Observations et théories des anciens sur les attractions et

la repulsion magnétiques,” in Atti dell’ Accademia Pontefici dei Nuovi

Lincei, vol. xviii, p. 18 (1864–65).

Footnote 119:

“Gemmarum et lapidum historia,” Lug. Bat., 1636, p. 466; Lib. II, cap.

204.

Footnote 120:

From Robert Norman’s “The Newe Attractive,” London, 1581.

Footnote 121:

Aldrovandi, “Museum metallicum,” Bononiæ, 1648, p. 566.

Footnote 122:

Ploss, “Das Weib,” Leipzig, 1895, vol. ii, p. 350.

Footnote 123:

Aldrovandi, “Museum metallicum,” Bononiæ, 1648, pp. 564, 566.

Footnote 124:

Garcias ab Orta, “Aromatum historia” (Latin version by Clusius),

Antverpiæ, 1579, p. 178. See also Valentine Ball in Proc. Roy. Ir.

Soc., 3d Ser., vol. i, p. 662; Colloquy xliii, of the work of Garcias,

translated from the Portuguese original.

Footnote 125:

William Jones, “Credulities Past and Present,” London, 1880, pp. 160,

161; citing “Panorama,” vol. vii.

Footnote 126:

D’Herbelot, “Bibliothèque Orientale,” La Haye, 1778, p. 229.

Footnote 127:

Rose, “Aristotle de lapidibus und Arnoldus Saxo,” in Zeitsch. für D.

Alt., New Series, vol. vi. 1875.

Footnote 128:

Ibid., p. 358.

Footnote 129:

Ibid., p. 370.

Footnote 130:

Ibid., p. 379.

Footnote 131:

Nona Lebour, “Amber and Jet in Ancient Burials,” reprint from

Transactions of the Dumfriesshire and Galloway Natural History and

Antiquarian Society, Nov. 27, 1914, pp. 4, 5.

Footnote 132:

American Journal of Science, 4th Ser., vol. iii, pp. 1–13, New Haven,

1897.

Footnote 133:

Tiguri, 1565, f. 66.

Footnote 134:

Titi Livi, “Ab urbe condita,” lib. xxix, cap. 11.

Footnote 135:

“Adversus Gentes,” lib. vii.

Footnote 136:

Prudentius “Hymnus X,” 11, 156, 157. This writer was born in 348 A.D.

and died about 410.

Footnote 137:

“Dissertation sur la pierre de la Mère des Dieux,” in Mém. de l’Acad.

des Inscrip. et Belles Lettres, vol. xxxviii, p. 370; Paris, 1770.

Footnote 138:

Miers, “Fall of Meteorites in Ancient and Modern Times,” Science

Progress, vol. vii, No. 8, July, 1898, p. 351.

Footnote 139:

Laufer, “Jade: A Study in Chinese Archæology and Religion,” Chicago,

1912, pp. 54, 55, 57, 63, 64; Field Museum of Natural History, Pub.

154, Archæological Series, vol. x.

Footnote 140:

Morris Jastrow, Jr., “Die Religion Babyloniens und Assyriens,” vol.

ii, Pt. II, Giessen, 1912, pp. 689, 690.

Footnote 141:

Ibid., pp. 692–694.

Footnote 142:

Benzinger, Hebräische Archäologie, Freiburg i. B., 1894, p. 370.

Footnote 143:

Lenormant, “Lettres Assyriologiques,” Paris, 1872, vol. ii, p. 118.

Footnote 144:

Miers, “Fall of Meteorites in Ancient and Modern Times,” Science

Progress, vol. vii, No. 8, July, 1808, p. 349.

Footnote 145:

E. F. F. Chladni, “Verzeichniss der herabgefallenen Stein- und

Eisenmassen,” p. 5; Gilbert’s Annalen der Physik, vol. 1.

Footnote 146:

Plutarchi, “Vitæ,” Lipsiæ, 1879, p. 394; Lysander, 12.

Footnote 147:

C. Plinii Secundi, “Historia naturalis,” Venetiis, 1507, fol. 8,

recto; lib. ii, cap. 60.

Footnote 148:

Cornelii Taciti, “Opera,” Lipsiæ, 1885, p. 52.

Footnote 149:

Philostratus, “Apollonius of Tyana,” trans. by Baltzer, Rudolstadt i.

Th., 1883, p. 143 (iii, 59).

Footnote 150:

Lenormant, in Daremberg and Saglio’s Dict., des antiq. grecques et

romaines, vol. i, Paris, 1873, p. 645.

Footnote 151:

F. Lenormant, in Daremberg and Saglio’s Dict. des antiq. grecques et

romaines, vol. i, p. 645, Paris, 1873. See Fig. 739.

Footnote 152:

Aen. ii, 692–698.

Footnote 153:

De Mély, “Le traité des fleuves de Plutarche”; in Revue des Etudes

Grecques, vol. v (1892), p. 334.

Footnote 154:

Suetonii, “Opera,” Lipsiæ, 1886, p. 203; Galba, 8.

Footnote 155:

This name signifies “Mountain-God” and its assumption by the emperor

marked his devotion to the worship of the divinity animating the stone

of Emesa, El Gabal, which Elagabalus had conveyed to Rome, where it

remained until 222 A.D. This stone was regarded as a miniature

representation of the sacred mountain near Emesa. The stone is figured

on the aureus of the emperor Uranius Antonius. See Ch. Lenormant, Rev.

Numismatique, 1843, p. 273, sq., Pl. IX, No. 1.

Footnote 156:

Lenormant, “Lettres Assyriologiques,” Paris, 1872, vol. ii, p. 123.

Footnote 157:

“Voyages d’Ibn Batoutah.” Translation by C. Defremery and B. R.

Sanguinette, vol. i, 3d Ed., Paris, 1893, p. 314.

Footnote 158:

Sale, “The Koran” (Preliminary Discourse), Phila., 1853, p. 14.

Footnote 159:

Burckhardt, “Travels in Arabia,” London, 1829, p. 137.

Footnote 160:

Burckhardt, “Travels in Arabia,” London, 1829, p. 167.

Footnote 161:

Chardin, “Voyage en Perse,” Amsterdam, 1735, vol. iv, p. 171.

Footnote 162:

Giovanni B. Rampolli, “Annali Musulmani,” vol. viii, Milano, 1824, p.

589, note 104.

Footnote 163:

Dr. C. Snouck-Hurgronje, “Mekka,” Haag, 1888, vol. i, pp. 2, 4, 5.

Footnote 164:

Op. cit., p. 11.

Footnote 165:

From Hammer-Purgstall’s “Fundgrube des Orients,” vol. iv, Heft 3;

cited by E. F. F. Chladni, “Neues Verzeichniss der herabgefallenen

Stein- und Eisenmassen,” p. 55; Gilbert’s Annalen der Physik, vol. 1.

Footnote 166:

E. F. F. Chladni, “Neues Verzeichniss der herabgefallenen Stein- und

Eisenmassen,” p. 58; Gilbert’s Annalen der Physik, vol. 1.

Footnote 167:

Ibid., p. 5.

Footnote 168:

Berthelot, “Histoire des Sciences: La Chimie au Moyen-âge,” Paris,

1893, vol. iii, p. 225.

Footnote 169:

Brezina, “The Arrangement of Collections of Meteorites”; Proceedings

of the American Philosophical Society, vol. xliii, Jan.-Dec., pp. 212,

213.

Footnote 170:

King, “Remarks Concerning Stones said to have Fallen from the Clouds,”

London, 1796, p. 4.

Footnote 171:

Megenberg, “Buch der Natur,” ed. Pfeiffer, Stuttgart, 1861, p. 92.

(This is based on Thomas de Cantimpré’s “Liber de natura rerum,”

written about 1240.)

Footnote 172:

E. F. F. Chladni, “Neues Verzeichniss der herabgefallenen Stein- und

Eisenmassen,” p. 17; Gilbert’s Annalen der Physik, vol. 1. (From copy

having MS. notes and emendations by the author.)

Footnote 173:

Metallotheca Vaticana, Romæ, 1719, p. 248.

Footnote 174:

Ulyssis Aldrovandi, “Museum Metallicum,” pp. 528, 529.

Footnote 175:

Fundgruben des Orients, vol. iv, p. 282; Wien, 1814.

Footnote 176:

King, “Remarks Concerning Stones said to have Fallen from the Clouds,”

London, 1796, p. 26.

Footnote 177:

Lieut. Robert E. Peary, “Northward over the ‘Great Ice,’” New York,

1897, vol. ii, pp. 553 sqq.

Footnote 178:

Edmund Otis Hovey, “The Foyer Collection of Meteorites,” American

Museum of Natural History, Guide Leaflet No. 26, December, 1907, pp.

23–27.

Footnote 179:

Henry A. Ward, “Willamette Meteorite”; Proc. Rochester Acad. of Sc.,

vol. iv, pp. 137–148, plates 13–18.

Footnote 180:

Edmund Otis Hovey, “The Foyer Collection of Meteorites,” American

Museum of Natural History, Guide Leaflet No. 26, December, 1907, pp.

27, 28.

Footnote 181:

See the present writer’s “Diamond and Moissanite; Natural, Artificial

and Meteoric,” a lecture delivered at the Twelfth General Meeting of

the American Electro-chemical Society in New York City, October 18,

1907; here the literature on this important meteor is fully given. Two

other interesting meteorites are described by George F. Kunz and

Ernest Weinschenk in the American Journal of Science, vol. xliii, May

1892, pp. 424–426, figures.

Footnote 182:

See Henri Moissan, “Étude de la météorite de Cañon Diablo,” Comptes

Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, vol. cxvi (1893), pp. 288 sqq.; see

also his paper on the Ovifak meteorite, Comptes Rendus, vol. cxxi

(1895), pp. 483 sqq.

Footnote 183:

G. F. Kunz and O. W. Huntington, “On the Diamond in the Cañon Diablo

Meteoric Iron and on the Hardness of Carborundum,” American Journal of

Science, vol. xlvi, December, 1893.

Footnote 184:

George F. Kunz, “On Five American Meteorites,” American Journal of

Science, vol. xl, Oct., 1890, pp. 312–323.

Footnote 185:

Lazarus Fletcher, in Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th ed., vol. xviii, p.

263; article Meteorites.

Footnote 186:

Chladni, op. cit., p. 8.

Footnote 187:

Petri Borelli, “Hist. et observ. phys.-med.,” 1676; cited by Chladni,

op. cit., p. 20.

Footnote 188:

Chladni, op. cit., p. 14; see also Gilbert’s Annalen, vol. xxix, p.

376.

Footnote 189:

Chladni, op. cit., p. 19.

Footnote 190:

Chladni, op. cit., p. 22.

Footnote 191:

See “Nature” for June 23 and July 21, 1910.

Footnote 192:

Merrett, “Pinax rerum naturalium Britannicarum,” London, 1667, p. 219.

Footnote 193:

“The Works of the Hon. Robert Boyle,” vol. i, p. 244, London, 1744.

Footnote 194:

Vol. ii, pp. 335–7, 1820.

Footnote 195:

Edward E. Free in Nature, Nov. 3, 1910, No. 2140, vol. lxxxv.

Footnote 196:

Arnaldo Faustini, “Gli Eschimesi,” Torino, 1912, p. 41.

Footnote 197:

Edward M. Curr, “The Australian Races,” Melbourne and London, vol.

iii, p. 29.

Footnote 198:

Bellucci, “Il feticismo in Italia,” Perugia, 1907, pp. 17 sqq.

Footnote 199:

Harriet Maxwell Converse, “Myths and Legends of the N. Y. State

Iroquois,” edited and annotated by Arthur Caswell Parker

(Ga-wa-so-wa-neh), New York State Museum Bulletin, No. 125, Albany,

1908, p. 40.

Footnote 200:

Adair, “History of the American Indians,” London, 1775, p. 425.

Footnote 201:

Frischbier, “Hexenspruch und Zauberbann,” Berlin, 1870, p. 19.

Footnote 202:

Ibid., p. 107.

Footnote 203:

Hartmann, “Bilder aus Westfalen,” Osnabrück, 1871, p. 144.

Footnote 204:

Lund, “Om de Sydamericanske Vildes Steenöxer,” Annaler for Nordisk

Oldkyndighed, Copenhagen, 1838–1839, p. 159.

Footnote 205:

Rath, in Globus, vol. xxvi, p. 215 (Braunschweig, 1874).

Footnote 206:

Koudela and Jetteles in Anthrop. Gesellsch. Wien, vol. xii, p. 159

(1882).

Footnote 207:

Quoted by Sir J. E. Tennant in Notes and Queries, vol. v, 1852, p. 121

(No. 119, Feb. 7, 1852).

Footnote 208:

“Les Six Voyages de Jean Baptiste Tavernier,” La Haye, 1718, vol. ii,

p. 439; liv. iii, chap. xi.

Footnote 209:

Magnusen, “Om en Steenring med Runeindskrift,” Annaler for Nordisk

Oldkyndighed, Copenhagen, 1838–1839, p. 133.

Footnote 210:

Magnusen, “Om en Steenring med Runeindskrift,” Annaler for Nordisk

Oldkyndighed, Copenhagen, 1838–1839, pp. 132–134.

Footnote 211:

Brereton, “Travels in Holland, the United Provinces, England, Scotland

and Ireland, 1634–1635,” Chetham Soc., London, 1844, p. 41.

Footnote 212:

The fossilized horny process of an extinct cuttlefish.

Footnote 213:

A. E. Wright and E. Lovett, “Specimens of Modern Mascots and Ancient

Amulets of the British Isles,” Folk Lore, vol. xix, 1908, p. 298; Pl.

VI, fig. 2.

Footnote 214:

Mooney, “The Medical Mythology of Ireland,” Am. Phil. Soc., vol.

xxxiv, p. 143, 1887.

Footnote 215:

Henderson, “Folk-lore of Northern England,” pp. 185, 186.

Footnote 216:

Nilsson, “The Primitive Inhabitants of Scandinavia,” trans. by the

author and ed. by Sir John Lubbock, 3d ed., London, 1868, pp. 200,

201.

Footnote 217:

Tournier, Bull. de la Soc. d’Anthrop., 1874, p. 386.

Footnote 218:

Bull. de la Soc. d’Anthrop., 1860, p. 96.

Footnote 219:

Morgan, “Matériaux pour l’hist. primitive,” Paris, 1885, p. 484;

Verhandl. Berl. Anthrop. Ges., 1879, p. 300; Von Rosenberg, “Der

Malayische Archipel,” Leipzig, 1878, p. 175.

Footnote 220:

Semper, “Die Philippinen,” Würzburg, 1869, p. 61.

Footnote 221:

Von Siebold, Jr., Verhandl. Berl. Anthrop. Ges., 1878, p. 431.

Footnote 222:

Sven Nilsson, “The Primitive Inhabitants of Scandinavia,” trans. by

the author and ed. by Sir John Lubbock, 3d ed., London, 1868, p. 199.

Footnote 223:

Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India, vol. x, pp. 255–259.

Footnote 224:

Theophrastus’s “History of Stones,” with an English version by John

Hill, London, 1746, p. 73.

Footnote 225:

Martius, “Unterricht von der Magiæ Naturali,” Leipzig, 1717, p. 290.

Footnote 226:

From a fourteenth century Italian MS. translation of the treatise in

the author’s library; see fol. 8, recto, col. 2; fol. 9, recto, col.

1; fol. 10, recto, col. 2; fol. 14, verso, col. 1; fol. 17, verso,

col. 1; fol. 25, verso, col. 1; fol. 26, verso, col. 1; fol. 26,

verso, col. 2; fol. 29, verso, col. 2.

Footnote 227:

Regimen sanitatis Salernitanum, ed. Sir Alexander Cooke, Oxford, 1830,

p. 125. This edition contains reproductions of many curious woodcuts

from the old German editions of Curio, published in 1559, 1568 and

1573.

Footnote 228:

Havard, “Histoire de l’orfévrerie,” Paris, 1896, p. 359; Olivier de la

Haye, “Poème sur la grande peste de 1348,” verses 3162 sqq.

Footnote 229:

Francisci Indiæ, “Hygiphylus sive de febre maligna dialogus,” Veronæ,

1593, pp. 125, 126.

Footnote 230:

Dr. B. Jézak, “Aus dem Reiche der Edlesteine,” Prag, 1914, p. 65.

Footnote 231:

Kobert, “Ein Edlestein der Vorzeit,” Stuttgart, 1910, p. 36.

Footnote 232:

Andrea Matthiolus, “Commentaries sur Discoride,” Lyon, 1642 (written

in 1565), p. 538.

Footnote 233:

Fühner, “Lithotherapie,” Berlin, 1902, p. 44.

Footnote 234:

Braunfels, “Reformation der Apptecken,” Strassburg, 1536, fol. XIV b,

XX b.

Footnote 235:

Francisci Indiæ, “Hygiphylus, sive de febre maligna dialogus,” Veronæ,

1593.

Footnote 236:

Op. cit. pp. 115 sqq.

Footnote 237:

Op. cit., p. 116.

Footnote 238:

Op. cit., pp. 118–122.

Footnote 239:

Boyle, “On the Usefulness of Experimental Philosophy,” Oxford, 1664,

p. 108.

Footnote 240:

Johannis Wolffii, “Curiosus amuletorum scrutator,” Francofurti et

Lipsiæ, 1692, p. 564.

The magic of jewels and charms · 第 31 / 34 段